cemetery. that all starts at 11:00 eastern this morning. over on c-span2, live coverage the a 5:30 eastern on the discussion of what's next for turkey after the result of their recent elections. that conversation take place at the bipartisan policy center. again, live at 5:30 eastern on c-span2. >> so to a all of you, thank you for your support and the kids for just saying no. thank you. [ applause ]. >> my hope is that the women of the future will feel truly free to follow whatever paths their talents and their natures point to. >> i think they thought the one house was so glamorous. and your role was so glamorous, your life was so glamorous.

and all they saw were the parties and the meeting people. and i'm going to tell you, i never worked harder in my life. >> nancy reagan served as long-time political partner, ferocious protector and ultimately as care taker for president ronald reagan and involved first lady. she was active with key staff decisions, policy making and campaigning. she made drug use her signature initiative with her just say no campaign. nancy reagan on c-span's original series "first ladies" influence and image. examining the public and private lives of women who filled the position of first lady from martha washington to michelle obama. sundays 8:00 p.m. eastern on c-span3.

>> defense one held their annual summit in washington, d.c. on defense and national security issues. we hear from assistant attorney general for national security, national director rasmussen and general mark milly. this is about an hour. >> so thank you for inviting us to do this here today. i'm going to introduce you briefly to our guests. this is john car hand, at the justice department. they handle intelligence matters from the legal perspective at doj. nick rasmussen, since 2014 has

been the leader of the national terrorism center and previously worked with the white house as advise er to the president on national security. both gentlemen lead agencies that were born out of the 9/11 commission report. i wonder if you could give us a perspective 15 years removed how you see the role of our agencies as they evolved? >> it was created in 2006 as a result of reforms recommended from one of the post-9/11 commissions.

sat side by side. so it was created so there would be a one stop shot with a full range of national security problems could be tackled. in doing that, it meant looking at legal problems in a way where, whether it was the department of defense, fbi, cia, nsa, that we viewed the problem as one that was intelligence driven, meaning we would look at what the intelligence showed the threat was. and then that our solutions, our legal solutions should be tailored against that threat to disrupt it. when was not necessarily a prosecution. that occurred after the fact. it was too late. but a win was using the full range of legal tools to make sure analysts and professionals like those for national counterterrorism center had the full view of what the picture

was. once they is showed what the threat was, the operators and law enforcement across the government had the full range of legal tools of disrupting it. in terps of where we are now, we have gotten very good at applying a that model against the terrorist threat. we sit together almost every day in "the situation room". and you'll have a terrorist or terrorist group. we have each go around the table with all the different authorities and expertise we bring to bear and say how do we disrupt them, stop them overseas before they can do an attack. for us, though, what we realized looking at some of the success we had against the terrorist threat is we needed to get better in applying the model when it came to cyber security threats. on the one handle, to handle

that which is on the classified side, sources, methods, get read in on and the threats are. on the other hand, learn about bits and bytes, computer fraud and abuse act. electronics communications privacy act. and then send those trained prosecutors back out to all 94 u. s. attorneys' offices at the same time as the fbi issued an he edict. thou shalt share what was on the on intelligence side with the newly trained lawyers. by now having these lawyers with the full range of set, look at what the intelligence shows the threat is that we can start getting creative at increasing the cost of it at detecting and deterring and disrupting it. >> thank you also. thank you defense one for

inviting me to join you today. the national counterterrorism center, we had a chance to look back and celebrate, take note of our 10-year anniversary. as you note indeed your opening, evan, it was created out of the 9/11 experience, specifically out of recommendations offered by the 9/11 commission. and then incorporated it in legislation by the congress. and i think 10 years on, looking at where we are, the fundamental weakness in our system that the intense reform and terrorism prevention act was designed to address, the sharing of information, i think we can look to some degree of satisfaction that the progress we have made in making sure all the relevant information and intelligence information that is available to the united states government is brought together in one place and few understood, assessed and analyzed. that happens every day at mctc. that is not to say we have gotten across every hurdle that we have traced