one of america's most symbolic structures. order online at c- span.org/store. . . >> michael fauntroy, how would you describe what you do for a living? >> i am an educator at george mason university. i teach graduate students courses in american government and urban policy and that sort of thing.

i'm also interested in a larger world. i try to do as much media as i can and write a little bit, columns. i am somebody who is trying to go beyond just the ivory tower walls of academia to speak to a large audience. that is a good deal of it. "the huffington post" and my own web site came about out of some frustration and i am writing columns and submitting them all across the country. not one was published. i got one published by the "topeka capital journal" years ago. i was so frustrated,i decided to go out and write my own columns on my own website. i knew someone who knew somebody at "huffington post." the next thing you know i was there.

that opportunity has opened up other opportunities. >> give us an example of what that does for you. >> it is actually pretty amazing. i have come to learn that many news producers go to "the huffington post" and i have ended up on radio or television. they would say they've read what i wrote on "huffington post" and it is a tremendous value in that regard. my location in d.c. helps as well. >> fourth generation washingtonian? >> yes. >> i love it where it says on your web site that you are the nephew of walter. fauntroy. >> idea that tongue-in-cheek -- i do that tongue-in-cheek, but i

do that to honor my father. if i had a dollar for every time someone assumed i was walter fauntroy's son, i would be a rich man. my first job ever, i was working on the grounds crew at the capitol in the summer of 1983, pulling weeds and cutting grass. there was some mix up in my start date. i was supposed to start on a monday and i did not actually get there until tuesday. my supervisor went on and on about how i am not allowed to go to the rayburn building to see my father during the day. i am here to work i had been through this before. it is not like i intended to go traipse around the building to find my uncle because he has a job to do. four or five weeks and somebody

tells him that walter fauntroy is my uncle, not my father. he pulled me aside and asked why i did not tell him this. i said he was too busy yelling at me. i was 16 at the time. i did not have any experience in the workplace. i let it roll off my back. >> what is the relationship of your father to walter fauntroy? >> my father, kenneth, is two years younger than michael. -- my uncle, and along wind of the brothers and sisters. -- in a long line of brothers and sisters. >> how many are there in that family? >> as many as eight, and now five are still with us. >> what is the difference -- before we go any farther, walter fauntroy is -- >> a hero of mine. i do not have many. i have had a chance to look first hand what it means to be committed to something greater

than yourself. i have seen the sincerity in that. i have come to believe his as a result of politics and it is an honorable profession. that is not the prevailing wisdom this decadese days. i have seen it with my own eyes. he was a child prodigy and went on to virginia university where he met martin luther king jr.. that sparked a friendship that lasted until king's assassination. he represented king. he was a washington bureau chief. he was a founding member of the congressional black caucus. toward the end of 2009, we're just recently celebrating the 25th anniversary of the free

south africa movement. he was a prime mover in that. he is still someone that is traveling around the world. he just retired this year after 50 years as pastor of the church where i was christened and married and around the corner from where i live right now. my wife and i and our two kids live in the house that my father and his family grew up in. family is a big deal to me. >> i read that you wrote that walter fauntroy met martin luther king when martin luther king was 22. martin luther king would today be 80 and your uncle is 76. tell us about your father. what has your father done? >> my father has been retired. he was at the department of

justice for years as a program analyst. he graduated central state college in may of 1957. he was born in 1935. graduated from cardozo high school here in the district. he swam and played football like a lot of people his age. big in athletics. my mother, sarah moore fauntroy, i won't tell you when she was born. she was born in north carolina, burlington. she spent part of her early years in connecticut. -- she had a lot of foresight for someone so young. she left and came to d.c. we have not talked a lot about that. i remember her saying there were no opportunities there and she

did not just want to do what they did -- what black women of a certain age did. she wanted something different for her life. she came here and worked and met my father and they got married in 1963. i came along a few years after that. my brother, two years after me. my mother was home for a long time. i finished my bachelor's degree and then two master's degrees. >> you had a ph.d. from howard university? >> absolutely. and a master's degree. i had a lot of family connections to howard. my uncle graduated from howard. he was a tuskegee airman. he dropped out of high school to enlist. he worked his way through college. he developed the metro rail system in d.c.

he is someone for whom i have a great deal of love and respect. >> let me go to something that i read that you wrote. "as a senate bid use almost everything in political terms." -- "as a cynic, you view almost everything in political terms quot." >> if all you have is a hammer, every problem you have is a nail. anything other than political terms, when i look at a debate about what ever is going on in the world, i am thinking about the political angle of it. not the policy and will. that is an important distinction. the merits of a policy on one hand, and there is the political back-and-forth that will

determine the policy. it is hard to not become cynical or at least skeptical about the process when you see good ideas continually stifled and bad ideas occasionally slip through. i think that happens far too frequently. we focus on a number of things that do not have a lot to do with the real needs of the people. again, given my own family and ideological and personal orientation, i am much more concerned about the needs of the people. >> what is your political level? do you have one? >> i am not partisan. -- i am ideological but not partisan. some will say that that is splitting hairs. i see myself left-of-center, politically.

i am not rigid. some of that is because of the academic training. if you are well trained, academically, you understand that you have to look at all sides of the issue before you decide which way you want to go. to the decision you make, in terms of which way you want to go may be guided by your own ideology, but i do think you need to be cognizant of all views. >> on your web site, i will read back to you what you say and i want you to define it. you say, "telling it like it is." this whole slogan obviously came from somewhere. explain it. >> part of it is howard cosell. you recall the great sports caster. he always talked about telling it like it is. i really do believe that our political discourse is opposed -- is improved by seek -- by

people speaking the truth as they see it, rather than to trying to filter through making sure they are locked into their own ideological view. there are similarities. you have to call it as it is. >> and then you say, "no spin." i am absolutely driven crazy by some of the things i see on the radio. people obviously being guided by talking points provided by their organization and are intent on spending the public. what i want people to know is that they will read something that is not intended to spin them, but is designed for the express purpose of expressing my own opinion about the issue and

then leaving it up to you to decide if you know what i am talking about. i emphasize in my classes, all the time, that when i give commentary, i tell the class that this is my view. you do not have to except it. i do not want to indoctrinate you. i just want to give you my sense of it and we can talk about your position. >> when do you hear spin the most often? >> there are two places. there is the political ad operation which exists for the sole purpose of spinning. i think there is also too much spin in news. on some of these shows, they are just chasing the same story. everybody is talking about the same story at the same time when there is so much else going on in the world.

there are some stories that deserve the media coverage. i understand that. there is too much of beating a dead horse. >> the next thing you say on your web site is, "no stupidity." >> there is a lot of stupid stuff on the internet and on television and radio. >> no axes to grind. >> i am ideological, but i am not partisan. i am not carrying a flag for anyone but myself. >> no hidden agendas. >> i do not have any hidden agendas. this is a way to express my own position. i do so to the best extent possible and leave it to others to decide what is going on. >> just, provocative commentary. >> i try to be provocative. i have gotten some interest in

responses to some of what i have written, some which leads me to wonder if they read what i have written. >> explain. >> let's take the presidential campaign. i voted for president obama. i was skeptical for his capacity to win because i was not sure the country was ready to do that. i was also disappointed to the extent of which issues of race and equality were never sufficiently discussed. when i wrote about that frustration and my skepticism

about how committed he is to racial justice and solving inequality, i got hammered pretty good. i was fine with it because i spoke my own truth. if people disagree, that is fine. >> you have a question. are you ready to go beyond conventional wisdom? >> i tried to look at issues in a way that goes beyond just what you could get anywhere else. i would not always be successful, but that is what i try to do. >> this must be your bio page. >> i should say all my truth. and truth is a relative thing, right?

in some cases. >> i really do think this is an opportunity for new voices to get seen and get heard and that is one of the things i am trying to do. you can go to the people you always have gone to. that is your choice. if you want something new, then check me out. >> you wrote about race and the campaign. first, grade barack obama from your standard. >> overall? >> overall. >> i would give him a strong "b." he has a very difficult job with the international part of that because he is trying to undo some of the problems that were created by the previous

administration. i support what he is trying to do. i think he is doing as well as he can. nobody is perfect. >> you say that you agree with eric holder's comment when it comes to race. that we are a nation of cowards. >> yes. in that particular column, i am saying that eric holder's comments they were accurate and needed to be spoken, and the president's response was cowardly at worst. let me just say a couple of things. i think that the only time we really talk as a nation about race is when there is a crisis of some sort. when a police officer arrested professor. or when rodney king is beaten by cops. when susan smith says that some

black man took her car and kids and we later find out that that was not the case. they are only discussions when they are crises. i think that is the wrong time to get the ball rolling. for eric holder to make those comments was a wake-up call. >> there is an implication in this whole business that something is not being said. during the bill clinton administration, we had that whole discussion on race. we probably carry more about race on this network than anyone else. what is not being said? >> there is something missing in what is being said and what is being done. in what is being said, i do not think the country has a real

sense of what the problems are. we think we know. one book that i am reading is by william julius wilson. it speaks to some of the conservative arguments. that these are sociological issues. wilson is arguing more about structure. we do not talk about structure. we do not talk about the fact that roughly 46% of people incarcerated are african- american. there has to be some sort of structural explanation for this. otherwise, the explanation is that black people are pathological and they will end up in jail so we should not do much in terms of public policy. it would be a waste of money. i think that we need to do a

better job of explaining the context in which this exists. i do not think we do it enough. this is a great venue, but in my opinion, it is not enough. >> i tried to figure out a way to do this to get you to put it into context. you may not like this, but i went back and found some quotes from jeremiah wright. i did that because he created at all this back in the campaign. -- all is flailing about back in the campaign. i wondered if you could tell me if you think he is right or wrong. this is a quote. i actually found this on wikipedia. >> by the way, if you were one of my students and you submitted a paper that cited wikipedia, we would have problems. >> the quote itself is accurate.

>> is there anything you disagree with? >> to the extent that i disagree, it would be that he did not acknowledge that there are exceptions. there are examples of african- americans that have met with great success.

some of whom did so after being greg cit -- granted access to the institutions he referred to. i believe that history is what it is. i cannot believe i just used that phrase. our history is irrefutable. we did do internment camps. we did do this institution of slavery. we have created separate systems, one that left african- americans holding the short end of the stick. it is difficult to quibble with that. we have come very far as a country. but at the same time, we cannot ignore the lessons of our history. >> he goes on to say --

>> you know how incendiary that was. they ran the clips. >> right, right. what is interesting about that, and we are not in church. we are not in the context in which that was said. as you know, preachers are also entertainers. i think, and i do not know this to be true, but i think that a number of pastors around the country that have said incendiary things in their pulpits to make a point.

i think that is what he tried to do there. >> did he say anything wrong? >> let's go back through it again. >> government bills bigger prisons and they want us to sing god bless america. >> on a per-capita basis, the united states incarcerates more people than anywhere in the world. some of that is out of an explosion of the "get tough on drugs" in the '80s. and centsince, including three strikes. that is a fact. i do not think there is any refuting that. we talked earlier about eric holder. eric holder said something that i think is notable. drugs are being allowed to be carried into black neighborhoods around the country. but eric holder once said that somebody can bring the drugs in,

but that does not mean we have to use it or sell it. i think that that context has to be added as well. >> i have read wikipedia text before and never once had anybody tell us is not accurate. >> it is an open source. i think that it compromises the legitimacy or validity of something that comes through. it is better than it used to be. i've been at george mason since 2002. when i first started seeing students use it, some of the stuff was patently false. i'm sort of say -- sort of relating open source research. i did not have any problem with

what you read. >> but it is not that nothing ever goes wrong. we were involved with several conversations when wikipedia accused him of something very wrong. chauncey and dollar -- john seiganthaler. i just wanted to hear your response. here are some more quotes. from jeremiah wright --

>> is there anything you disagree with? >> you're killing me, brian. let's go back to the beginning. i teach this in my course in american government. we have the first 10 amendments, what we call the bill of rights. and then we have an amendment process. there are those about equal protection, the right to vote, women's suffrage and more. it is irrefutable that the constitution did not include a white women or slaves. there is no questioning that. when you look at the history of the constitution, it was intended for people who were wealthy enough to own land, and

the thinking behind that was that those that were healthy enough would be smart enough to run the country. i did not have any problem with that. some of the other stuff, i'm not going to touch that. >> what you think of clarence thomas? >> i think he is someone with a very interesting and commendable personal story treated i'm obviously not on the same side of the fence. personal -- personal story. i am obviously not on the same side of the fence. >> it turns out that he got 95% of the black vote. -- that obama got 95% of the black vote. >> big surprise. >> the biggest in history.

>> it also should be noted that al gore got 91%. >> what is it about the black person in this country that loves the democratic party? >> it is about not having a better alternative. for all intents and purposes, we are a two-party country. i write this in my book, "republicans and the black vote ." i think that african-americans always vote democratic. when i was doing research, i would hear from african- americans that we are trying to bring the party back to its roots. african-americans were probably more supportive of the republican party during reconstruction then they were for the democrats now. african-americans are where they have always been, which is center-center/left.

if you look at the evolution of the parties, republicans have moved away from that -- from where they are and democrats have moved away from where they are. democrats are more closely aligned with african-americans because they are no longer were they used to be. to the extent where we can say that african-americans love democrats, over the course of the century, they have been closer to african-americans than republicans. in the elections, it is a zero sum game. i have to vote for the person who is closest to me ideologically. >> you're talking about "republicans and the black vote." it was written what year? >> the paper book was published in 2008. hardback was 2007. >> why would you want to write

about republicans? >> i am trying to get tenure. you have to publish. i have always considered myself a writer. you want to deal with issues that are not easily addressed. were not addressed in any significant way. during the course of my research, i did not find very many books that dealt with this issue. the relationship between african-american voters and the republican party. i have to emphasize that too often people have assumed that this is a book about black republicans. it is not. it is a book about the republican party. i emphasize that because i have had some unfortunate incidents where people would assume that imus be a republican. -- that i therefore must be a republican. >> in 1944, thomas dewey got 44% of the black vote.

he was a republican and you had charts like that in the book. >> one of the things i wanted to do was lay out what to do would allow. to the extent that the data would allow all, how they have done with the black vote. richard nixon, in 1960, when vice-president nixon ran, he got about 30% of the black vote. >> can you tell me what happened that began the shift? >> it was not just one moment. it was an evolution. i trace it back to the republicans in dealing with a construction. -- getting we need about reconstruction. -- weak-kneed about

reconstruction. if you want to come into the mid-20s century, you can book that harry truman. -- look at harry truman. what has to be noted is that the republicans began to retreat from some of their commitments. as a result of black migration, democrats began to get a new black voters that they had to beg -- had to deal with. -- that they had to contend with. there was a push away from republicans and a poll among democrats that helped to lead this. the final straw, i would say, was the 1964 goldwater campaign which was an abomination to most black people. >> you are married to a woman that is a lawyer? she is at the discovery channel. >> yes, my lisa. she is a wonderful woman. i am lucky because i married up. she probably cannot say the same pain.

-- the same thing. she is a lawyer. i am very proud of her. it she is the highest ranking attorney in the company. a multibillion-dollar operation and i'm very proud of what she has done there. she has been there for 13 or 14 years. she is doing very well. >> wanted to name your daughter sunshine? >> -- why did you name your daughter sunshine? >> that is not her official name. her official name is loading. -- logan. but i call her sunshine every day. but she is a bright and sunny baby. she is a sweetie. >> how old is your brother? -- her brother. >> two. they are twins. they are great. we are so lucky. they are healthy.

they are smart. very smart. my daughter is smart as a whip. just watching them grow has been a tremendous honor. >> back to some more issues. in 2007, wrote about the imus fallout and lessons for black america. >> i can always tell about how things are going in racial issues by media schedule. -- by my media schedule. when i am doing a lot of television, that means that something is going on. the imus situation is one of those examples. again, we only talk about race when there is a crisis. he said some ridiculous things on television. we go crazy. we had this conversation while the dust was still on the air and then when the dust settles, we go on to something else.

and nothing really happens. >> let me do a brief analysis and get your reaction. >> the rev. al sharpton goes after him. cbs fires him. -- msnbc. they have to pay him of some $20 million. he is now back on television and back on the radio and problem -- probably has multi-year contracts. what did we game? -- what did we gain out of all of that? >> nothing. nothing. he sat out a little bit. i guess we gained -- his show has not whitefaces. i think that we missed an opportunity. i want to explain to people that the educational process is how we change views on people. we cannot just educate and times -- in times of crisis. >> what was the statistic? >> 46% of those incarcerated are black americans.

currently. that does not include people who are under some form of supervision. we are talking about massive numbers of black men engaged in one way or another in the criminal justice system. >> what is your take on why? >> i think it is a systemic and i also think it is personal. from a systemic standpoint, we never really fixed education in america. we never really fixed the placement of jobs and a way to give people opportunities. i mention william julius wilson earlier. he wrote a book about a decade or so ago called the "when work disappears." a great book. it lays out what happens when jobs are nonexistent. would we have people who are not

well-educated and have no real opportunities all types of social dysfunction is allowed to spread. that is the systemic part of it that i think is a real problem. there are personal problems as well. we have too many fatherless children. we have too much going on in our community that does not lead or encouraged achievement. one of the disappointing things to me, and this happened to me when i was an elementary school kid. it happened years before i got to elementary school and it continues on. i have no idea where this came from. on too many black school yards in america, kids that want to do well and are trying to do well are not. -- are mocked.

-- you are trying to be white, as if trying to be educated is trying to be why. -- to be white. >> where did that come from? >> if i knew, i could solve some of these problems. i do not know. it is frustrating and demeaning. it is unfortunate. it is also depressing to kids that are unsure of themselves and want to belong. we talk about the power of words. words can help the derail kids. those are some of the words that can do the job. >> you have a forum and we are recording missed before you did your speech at george mason. it is a program called "visions quo." there are eight different speeches during the school year and you have to stand before an

audience said talk about what? >> this is something that is done by the office and mason is designed to feature faculty members and their research. you pick your topic based on what you're doing research on. in this case, i got the invitation back in march. i was trying to figure out what i would talk about. i was interested in race and politics. that is what i am writing about. that is what i do. i am trying to wrap my brain around the fact that this is a post ratio america. -- post-racial america, now that obama is president. the topic is post racial politics and the impact on politics. that is what i am going to discuss. >> what does it mean? >> i think post ratio is a term -- post-racial is a term that is

used in polite company to say that we as a country or beyond race. -- that we as a country are moving beyond race. on the surface, i think that sounds great. we need to be careful so as not to premature hoist the mission accomplished sign with regards to america's racial issues. i think it is also important that we not cast aside the history. when we say post racial, just as we say opposed civil rights, -- post civil-rights, people including michael walter. we need to not cast aspersions on people who gave their lives. >> on " walter fauntroy. do you think we will ever have a representative from the district of columbia? >> yes.

it is the right thing to do. we have a circumstance now with our current congresswoman from illinois who has served for nearly 20 years now. she is trying to shepherd through congress a bill that would grant the district delegate full voting representation. what we have had and is where a -- a piecemeal approach when it comes to congress, where by some special rule is created so that the delegate of the district of columbia and the delegates of the territories can vote on the floor, but if their vote constitutes a margin of victory, then there has to be an automatic revoked in which they cannot participate. that was something that was first created when the democrats were in control in the early '90s but done away with when the republicans took control.

we need something that will be in place, regardless of who is in charge in congress. >> this book, "home rule or house rule." when did you publish this? >> i did it because it is near and dear to my heart. if you are of a certain age, you understand congressional interference. >> any other capital city in the world where citizens can vote? -- cannot vote? >> i did some research on this. no, to my recollection. even in havana and caracas, they have some voting representation. many of them have complete autonomy and in some, there is a special district in which there is some federal or local

relationship. to my knowledge, they all have some voting representation. >> from your knowledge, could to -- could you live in any other country of the world that is multiracial and get a better deal than the united states? i do not mean the deal. it would be a better world for different reasons? -- for the different races. >> i don't know. i haven't thought about that. >> it is not to imply -- i just wonder if folks ever think about that they want to move to this country because they want to be treated a lot better. >> it is curious that you would ask that. i will deal with it but i want to talk about something else first. i know of gays that have moved to canada because they feel they could get a better deal.

ok, as you put it? >> that question. -- bad question. >> but in terms of race, i am not sure. if you are african-american, you could find a capital city in africa somewhere. -- i am thinking about a place that is multi-racial. >> race is endemic everywhere. >> why do you think that? >> i think because we are conditioned to understand and appreciate and embrace people that look like us and when we come across people who do not, we do not really know how to mix. my brother-in-law and his wife got married in france in 2002. she is french. after that trip, my wife and i met some friends and we were in

spain walking along the beach and it is blazing hot outside and we find a guy pushing a cart with some ice cream. i buy an ice cream bar, and all the wrapping of the bar -- on the wrapping of the bar is the most offensive imaging of an african with big lips, a huge eyes, a spear and a grass skirt. all this kind of stuff. i was thinking that i am in spain. what am i seeing this in spain? what is going on in spain? spain is probably no more indicative of the rest of the world than any other country. it to me, race is something that is part of the human condition. my interest in it is to focus on making sure that race is not used to disadvantages' some at the expense of others.

>> you mention something that is hidden in this town. there are 700 that work for the congressional research service. how long did you work there? >> i worked there in 1997. after i finished graduate school in 2000, i finished my dissertation of the congressional research center, i like to call it the greatest science department. -- political science department. researchers, many of whom have ph.d. s. you probably cannot get in the door anymore without a ph.d. in the field. they are people who do great research at the request of congress.

>> can a member really just call up and say they did a study on this? >> yes, it happens all the time. people have their research areas and build relationships with staff members. because these staff members are calling to find out who does x. they ask if you have any thing on this issue and you may already have something. if you do not, then the question is if you can get something quickly on this. it is very interesting and can be very intense. it is a great place. >> you can also remember when a member would request something and it would release it to the press. >> that is one of the really --

i almost said week. -- we. i've been gone from there for seven years now. those of us who worked there, we wanted to make sure that the reports were not used to facilitate a particular partisan and. -- partisan end. that cannot always be protected. it is frowned upon. the last thing we want is to hold a report done by a partisan think tank. it is another thing altogether to hold a report from the congressional research service that plays it straight and they have no axes to grind. >> sounds like something i read earlier. >> it was a great experience for me. it helped improve my riding and it helped get me to see -- my writing.

>> what happens if you get a call from a congressman, i want a study done on this, and you say did you do -- and you're sitting there thinking you do not want to do this. >> what you try to do is shake of the request in a way that it can be done and in a timely fashion. it is not unusual to get a call at 430 on thursday afternoon for a member saying that they need this tomorrow. it may not be possible, given the size and scope of the request. -- at 4:30 p.m. on thursday afternoon for a member saying that they need this tomorrow. the more savvy researchers understand that can -- and can often shaper request that will make it manageable. >> where do you live? >> my wife and i live along the u street corridor. >> with a name like fauntroy, do you think in terms of, if

there is an opportunity, you might run for that voting member of congress from the district of columbia? >> oh, brian, the only job i have ever coveted is serving in congress did that and playing -- the only job. that, and playing point guard for the lakers. but that is not going to happen. listen, i am one of the two people that actually reveres the institution of congress. i know those tunnels under congress like the back of my hand. i have seen it from a very small child. i played basketball in the house gym. i revere the place and what it represents. it is not perfect. there is -- it is far too partisan. at its best, congress is the

most incredible institution. i would love that job. >> i can see in that phase right -- face right there, walter fauntroy. there is a resemblance. does your dad looked like him? >> i get out a lot. no. the other thing i get is that i am so much taller than he is. i got up from my mother's side of the family. >> teaching american government at george mason university in virginia, the class is in front of you. is it usually graduate classes? >> yes. only graduate students. >> what is the overall mission. what do you want them to know? >> i want them to be very well focused on the institutions. you would be better able to understand how a certain lockout -- law got passed.

i talked earlier about the importance of understanding the political part of this in addition to the policy part. it is one thing to shape great policy but it will not be passed into law if the politics do not allow it. that is one of the things i tried to focus on. the other thing i focus on is getting students to understand thatgovernment is participatory. with interest groups and, there -- and money put into influencing members of congress, there is a reason why things are the way they are. >> your wife has a law degree. >> she graduated from georgetown, not far from here. >>as you walk around life, why do you think you did so well? >> we talked about this earlier. my father is a college graduate. my mother is a carlos graduate.

-- college graduate. >> why did they do well? >> my father had an athletic scholarship, but he also had people around him who were pushing him in that direction. a family, mentors, that sort of thing. it is not always easy, but we recognize that what you see around you is not necessarily what you want -- in line >> so -- necessarily what you want -- >> so if you go back even farther -- >> so, if you go back even farther? >> when the opportunity presented itself, they seized the opportunity. my mother, in her teens, knew that staying in north carolina

would not work for her. she wanted a different light. she moved to d.c., not knowing -- anybody. she ultimately got a bachelor's degree and two master's degrees. it just becomes a part of your dna and you understand that that is what the expectation is. >> do you have a favorite historian or writer in your life? >> what -- walter clayton powell. i remember watching you interview him.

that is one of the books that sticks with me. it is interesting. i do not get a chance to read for pleasure anymore because every time i read for pleasure, i think that this is a time i can be devoted to reading for my work. i do not get a chance to do all lot of fiction. >> how old are you now? >> 48. -- 43. >> that had to be 18 years ago. we are out of time. michael fauntroy, thank you for joining us. >> for a dvd copy of this

program, call 1-877-662-7726. for free transcripts or to give us your comments about this program, visit us at q-and- a.org. "q&a" programs are also available as c-span podcasts. >> up next, prime minister gordon brown at the british house of commons. after that, the state department discussion on u.s.-latin america relations. with secretary of state hillary clinton. and then a hearing on the public transportation safety. -- the safety of public transportation. tomorrow on "washington journal," eamon javers

john taylor talks about restructuring home mortgages. map youlevitt discusses the or rest of several americans in pakistan. and an author talks about his book, "putting medicare consumers in charge." >> if we had taken his advice, more people would be employed, more small businesses would have gone under, more remote ranch owners would have lost their homes, and what it tasted of higher deficit. mr. speaker, when i listen to him now, he has lost the art of communication but not, alas, the gift of speech. >> from london, prime minister's questions. gordon