only the plan mr. could trouble tuition fees and claim it as a better deal for students. this policy is in chaos. the education minister refuses to answer questions on this. isn't the most sensible maine for the prime minister to go away, and think again, and come up with a better proposal? ♪ >> from london, prime minister's questions from the british house of commons. david cameron responded mostly to questions on public education in light of recent increases to university fees. it will triple fees to 9,000 pounds, around $13,000 a year. later he reaffirmed his commitment to the transitioning of troops out of afghanistan. now, prime minister's questions. >> questions for the prime

minister. mark menzies. >> question number one, mr. speaker. >> i am sure that the whole house will wish to join me in paying tribute to private john howard from 3rd battalion, the parachute regiment, who died on sunday, december 5. he was an incredibly gifted and popular paratrooper. we should send our condolences to his family, his friends, and his loved ones at this very sad time. while i was in afghanistan, i also met the two brave paratroopers who were wounded at the same time that he was tragically killed. they were in the excellent camp bastion hospital, and i know that their families will be relieved to know that they are doing well and are in extremely good spirits. this morning i had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others. in addition to my duties in the house, i shall have further such meetings later today. >> mark menzies. >> i would like to associate myself with the condolences expressed by the prime minister. does my right honorable friend agree that it is vital that we invest in the future of the

unmanned aerial vehicle program that has been developed at warton in my constituency, and will he accept my invitation to come and see firsthand the outstanding workforce that is driving innovation and skills at that plant? >> i would be delighted if i could take up the opportunity of seeing my honorable friend's constituency and that facility. the truth is that the uav program is exactly the sort of defense asset that we should be investing in. it plays an absolutely vital role in afghanistan -- we are increasing our spending on that project -- and it shows the point of having a defense review, as it is vital to start spending money on the weapons of the future, rather than on legacies of the past. >> edward miliband. [unintelligible] >> may i join the prime minister in paying tribute to private john howard, from 3rd battalion, the parachute regiment? he showed enormous courage.

we pay tribute to his sacrifice, and our thoughts and deepest condolences are with his family. i join the prime minister also, as he recently came back from afghanistan, in paying tribute to all our troops serving in afghanistan and their families. can the prime minister confirm that after his changes are introduced, english students will pay the highest fees of any public university system in the industrialized world? >> the figures are well known for what students will pay. they are much lower than what students pay in the united states, for instance, but i have to say to the honorable gentleman that in the end, we have to make a choice here. if we want to see university education expand and universities well funded, we have to work out where that money is going to come from. our proposal is that graduates should make a greater

contribution, but only if they are successful. they will start only paying back when they are earning 21,000 pounds. that is better than the system that we inherited. >> the prime minister did not answer the question. this country will have the highest fees for going to a public university in the whole industrialized world. he says that his plans are about properly funding universities. they are not -- he is cutting public investment in universities and loading costs on to students and their parents. will he admit that the reason fees are being trebled is to make up for an 80% cut in the university teaching budget? >> the reason these contributions are going up is because we were left a completely unsustainable situation. that is why, before the last election, the labour government put in place the browne commission, and why the conservative party backed it.

one party has had the courage of its convictions to see this through. to be fair to the liberal democrats, they never signed up to the browne review. he did, and he is the one guilty of rank hypocrisy. >> he has given it away -- one party. there are 57 liberal democrats, and they are split four ways. that is something, even for the liberal democrats. things are so bad that the honorable member for birmingham, yardley is offering his own unique solution to the votes tomorrow. he says that if you run quickly, you can vote both ways. i have to say that if the kremlin were spying on the liberal democrats, we would know why -- they want a bit of light relief, frankly. let us have him on for another question, because he did not answer the first two. he says that he does not want the next generation to be in debt, so does he not understand

the anxiety that students and parents have about starting their adult lives with a debt of 40,000 pounds? >> you cannot attack a plan if you do not have a plan. the fact is that he went into the last election with a 25% cut planned for the business department. he has absolutely no way of making the numbers add up. everybody knows that they said that they would not introduce tuition fees. they introduced them. they said that they would not introduce top-up fees. they introduced them. they said that they supported the browne review. he wrote it into their manifesto. why are they breaking their pledge about the browne review? why? [unintelligible] the fact is --

>> order. all this finger-pointing is very unseemly. i want to hear the response of the prime minister. >> the leader of the labour party saw a big crowd assembling in the mall, and he just decided, "i am their leader, i must follow them." that is his idea of leadership. >> ed miliband. >> a week really is a long time in politics -- not so much waving but drowning. let us talk about social mobility, because that is at the heart of these proposals. let me quote someone whom the prime minister used to trust on social mobility -- the person he appointed to head his social mobility taskforce -- the right honorable member for haltemprice and howden. he said, "i'm concerned about the effect this would have on social mobility and the huge level of debt we are encouraging young people to take on." i know that he does not have much time for him these days, but why does he not listen to him on this issue?

>> let me tell him what has happened in terms of social mobility. last year, there were 80,000 students on free school meals. only 40 of them went to oxford and cambridge. that is the situation with social mobility. what we are introducing -- i know that they do not want to hear the details. we are introducing a situation where nobody pays fees up front, including part-time students -- which is 40% of students -- and nobody pays anything back until they are earning 21,000 pounds. under the new system, everyone will pay back less than what they pay under the current system. they will pay back less every month -- that is the case. the poorest will pay less, the richest will pay more. it is a progressive system, but he has not got the courage of his convictions to back it. >> only the prime minister could treble tuition fees and then claim that it is a better deal for students. no one is convinced, frankly. is it not absolutely clear that

this policy is in chaos? the education minister refuses to answer questions on it, and they rush out proposals on it daily. is it not the most sensible thing for the prime minister to go away, think again, and come up with a better proposal? >> the right honorable gentleman has absolutely no idea what he would put in its place. he supported a graduate tax, which his shadow chancellor does not back. he was the person who wrote the manifesto suggesting the browne review. he is just demonstrating complete political opportunism. yes, total opportunism. he is behaving like a student politician and, frankly, that is all he will ever be. >> mr. speaker, i was a student politician, but i was not hanging around with people who

were throwing bread rolls and wrecking restaurants. [unintelligible] is it not the truth that all the prime minister can offer us is "you've never had it so good" on planet cameron? what does he have against young people? he has taken away the child trust fund, he is abolishing the education maintenance allowance, he is scrapping the future jobs fund, and now he is trebling tuition fees. is not the truth that he is pulling away the ladder because he does not understand the lives of ordinary people up and down this country? >> the fact is that if you introduce a graduate tax, you are going to be taxing people on 6,000 pounds, on 7,000 pounds, on 9,000 pounds -- where is the fairness in that? the truth of the matter is that

we examined a graduate tax and we know it does not work. they examined a graduate tax and knows it does not work. the liberal democrats had a look at a graduate tax and they know it does not work. the only reason he is backing it is because it gives him a political opportunity. i know what it is like -- you can sit there for year after year, you see a political opportunity, but you will never be a party of government. >> chris kelly. >> thank you -- >> there is far too much noise in this chamber. the public absolutely detest and despise it. the house must come to order. chris kelly. >> the prime minister may be aware that a young constituent of mine, connor rankine-christ, was stabbed in an unprovoked attack at the weekend and has been battling to overcome life- threatening injuries this week. the suspect was released on bail just 24 hours after the attack, which has understandably upset and worried the victim's family. does my right honorable friend

agree that the courts should still be able to remand individuals in custody in the most serious cases where there is a risk that the defendant will cause injury by reoffending? >> i completely agree with my honorable friend. he is absolutely right -- the courts must have this power. if they believe that someone is dangerous and could offend again, it is absolutely right that that person is not given bail. that happens under our system and it should go on happening under our system. >> angus macneil. >> question number two, mr. speaker. >> expenditure through the program partnership agreement is not being reduced. we expect to allocate 120 million pounds every year to this program from 2011 to 2014. at the same time, we are increasing overall levels of support for the most effective organizations working overseas, and we are keeping the promise to reach 0.7% of gross national income for aid by 2013. >> many colleagues on both sides of the house, including myself, have seen at first hand

the great work that voluntary service overseas volunteers do worldwide. can the prime minister assure the house that he will continue to provide the necessary and expected support for vso to continue to improve the lives of 26 million people around the world? >> i can do that. voluntary service overseas is an excellent organization and i know it has widespread support across the house. my right honorable friend the secretary of state is in discussions about how to ensure that its program goes on succeeding and expanding. fundamentally, with a growth in the budget, there is every chance that that could happen. that is what i expect to see. >> would a government back- bench member like to contribute on this closed question? malcolm bruce. >> voluntary service overseas provides valuable experience opportunities as well as giving people a connection with development. i welcome what the prime minister has said, but can he give an assurance that vso's current concern that its budget might be cut will be overcome by giving it access to other budgets within the department for international development? >> i believe that the

discussions are going extremely well and that it will be possible to guarantee that. one reason why people are asking this question about program partnership arrangements is because the government wants to ensure that organizations are not wholly dependent on government money, but seek sources of funding elsewhere. as my right honorable friend says, there are opportunities through other budgets within dfid, including the global fund to combat poverty where they can make applications as well. >> david crausby. >> while temperatures drop across the uk, profit margins for the energy companies have risen by an unacceptable 38%, compelling those on limited incomes to turn their heating down. what will the prime minister do to force these privatized companies to pay back some of their excessive profits to customers before more pensioners freeze to death? >> the honorable gentleman is right to ask this question. two things need to be done.

the first is that the regulatory authorities need to be tough with the energy companies, and that is exactly what i expect ofgem to do. the second thing that needs to happen is that the cold weather payments need to kick in. we have already spent 173 million pounds since the particularly cold weather. one reason why this is working so well is that we have made permanent what was only a temporary increase before the last election. >> anna soubry. >> this morning, i spoke to one of my constituents. >> hooray! >> she is 76 -- it might come as news to members opposite, if they were quiet, and they should try it. she is 76 years of age, disabled, and has been housebound for 11 days now, because of the snow and ice in stapleford. does the prime minister agree that in such inclement weather it is imperative that we are good neighbors, especially to the elderly and the frail? >> my honorable friend makes an

extremely good point. of course the government should be there with cold weather payments, and we are. we should be there with winter fuel payments, and we are. it is also important that local government plays its role, ensuring that grit supplies are there. we can all help those who could suffer in the cold weather, and she is quite right to raise the point. >> kerry mccarthy. >> as someone who claims to be an avid fan of the smiths, the prime minister will no doubt be rather upset this week to hear that both morrissey and johnny marr have banned him from liking them. [laughter] the smiths, of course, are the archetypal student band. if he wins tomorrow night's vote, what songs does he think students will be listening to -- "miserable lie," "i don't owe you anything," or "heaven knows i'm miserable now"? >> if i turned up, i probably would not get "this charming man." if i went with the foreign secretary, it would probably be, "william, it was really nothing."

>> stewart jackson. >> does my right honorable friend agree that it is a badge of shame -- >> order. there is simply too much noise. it is very unfair. i want to hear mr. stewart jackson. >> does my right honorable friend agree that it is a badge of shame, for which the party opposite should apologize to taxpayers, parents, and pupils, that having doubled education spending during their term in office, they managed to drive down educational attainment standards to the bottom of the international league, according to the oecd? >> my honorable friend makes a good point. the tables published today make depressing reading. we are falling behind countries such as poland and estonia, which we should be well ahead of. frankly, this comes down to the choice we have to make. we made the choice of putting an extra 3 billion pounds into the schools budget during this parliament, because we want more done in early years and primary education so that we get the social mobility about which

the right honorable gentleman opposite was posing earlier. >> emma reynolds. >> over half the students at the university of wolverhampton come from disadvantaged backgrounds. this morning, the university and college union said that wolverhampton was one of the universities at high risk, owing to the government's massive 85% cuts to its teaching grant. will the prime minister explain to students and local businesses exactly why he is putting wolverhampton university at risk in that way? >> the honorable lady stood on a manifesto that supported the browne commission. she did -- she can deny it now, but that is what the manifesto written by the leader of the opposition said. the fact is that we have to make a decision. is it right for taxpayers to continue providing the predominant support for university education? they say yes now, but that is not what they stood on at the last election.

many taxpayers do not go to university or benefit from a university education, so it is better to ask students to contribute, but only when they are successful. no one will contribute until they earn 21,000 pounds, which is 6,000 pounds more than under the system that her party introduced. >> michael ellis. >> is my right honorable friend the prime minister as concerned as i am about the absurd health and safety legislation, which has reached such dizzy heights in this country that the chief executive of sainsbury's told me last week that christmas crackers are now category one fireworks, and cannot be sold to anyone under the age of 16 without the risk of a six-month sentence of imprisonment? will he put a firework up the health and safety legislation? >> that would give me enormous pleasure, and i look forward to doing so. >> ian mearns. >> the prime minister told the house in june that he had been treated not too badly on his last visit to gateshead.

we are, by nature, a very friendly bunch. will he return to discuss with regional political leaders of all parties their real concerns and fears that the government's current strategy is undermining the potential for economic recovery in our region, particularly through the slashing of support for the tourism industry? before he mentions it, we are already trying to squeeze a few gallons out of a pint-sized regional growth fund pot. >> there is big government support for the northeast. there is big support for nissan and its electric car, supporting the national renewable energy center, which is building the world's biggest testing facility for wave and tidal technology. we have also awarded a 7 million pound contract for the construction of the first advanced bioethanol plant in the tees valley. so we are investing in the northeast. he talks about a fragile economic recovery. if we had listened to his party, there would not be a recovery. we would be queuing up with

ireland to go to the imf. >> anne main. >> drunks and binge drinking have fuelled an economy that has sadly seen people the victims of knife crime. may i ask him to stiffen the justice secretary's resolve in dealing with those who carry knives and those who commit knife crimes? >> the honorable lady has made an important point. if she reads the green paper, she will see that adults committing a crime with a knife should expect to go to prison. that is absolutely right, because there are far too many people committing knife crimes today who do not go to prison, and they should. >> gregory campbell. >> the dissident terrorist threat is a continuing problem in northern ireland, and we have seen some evidence of the terrorists' capabilities in recent months. will the prime minister ensure that if additional resources that were not previously envisaged are deemed necessary by the chief constable to deal with such a threat, he will

ensure that they are provided without delay? >> of course we keep a very careful eye on the situation in northern ireland, and on whether additional resources are required. we stuck to the pledges made by the previous government about properly funding the devolution of policing and justice. i think that decisions are better made locally, which is why that was the right step to take. i know how difficult the security situation is in northern ireland, and i pay tribute to police on both sides of the border for the brilliant work that they do. of course we always stand ready to help, but we did make quite a generous settlement in terms of devolving law and justice, and that should be the first call for resources. >> richard ottaway. >> in afghanistan on monday, the prime minister said that british troops could start coming home from afghanistan as early as next year. this is a major policy shift. with which of our allies did he discuss that decision, and does he envisage the gap being filled by the afghan army or the us army?

>> what i said in afghanistan was what i said before i went to afghanistan and what i will happily say again today, which is that the whole of nato and all the nations of the international security assistance force that are involved in afghanistan are committed to transition to afghan control between the start of 2011 and the end of 2014. as that happens, there will clearly be opportunities either to reinvest troops in training missions or, indeed, to bring them home. what the chief of the defense staff and i both said at a press conference in afghanistan was that it may be possible to bring some of our troops home next year. >> david hanson. >> tomorrow the deputy prime minister will vote to break his election promise on tuition fees. this prime minister has also broken his election promise to maintain the child trust fund for the poorest in our society. what message does that send to young people about trusting government? >> i seem to remember that he was a minister in the last

government, who commissioned the browne review, that went into the election committed to cuts of 25% in the budget of the department for business, innovation and skills. if they were committed to that, what were opposition members going to do? were they going to cut the number of people in universities, or were they going to cut the money going to universities? we have had absolutely no answer. the people who are actually behaving in a way that i think drags politics through the mud are people who introduced tuition fees, introduced top-up fees, commissioned the browne review, and who then, as soon as they are in opposition, behave irresponsibly and run away from it. >> george eustice. >> there are currently plans to regenerate camborne and redruth, which would create 6,000 new jobs and allow the building of a modern, state-of- the art mine in redruth. however, the work depends on transport infrastructure improvements which are currently being reviewed by the department for transport. does my right honorable friend agree that in difficult times when capital is scarce, we

should prioritize projects that create jobs and deliver growth, and that the department for transport should review its assessment criteria? >> my honorable friend speaks very well for his constituency and fights very hard for the economy in redruth and camborne, and he is absolutely right that of course we should give priority to those that have the greatest economic return. that is what the department for transport does. it also has to look at environmental and other factors, but where we can show economic benefits from transport -- and remember that we are putting more money into transport capital infrastructure than the previous government planned to do -- that is how decisions should be made. >> nigel dodds. >> in light of his experience of the world cup bid in zurich last week, can the prime minister tell us what his view now is of an organization that engages in the most convoluted and bizarre voting arrangements, that says one thing and then votes exactly the opposite way, and that has a leader who seems more interested in power and prestige than accountability --

and after he has finished with the lib dems, can he tell us what he thinks of fifa? >> i certainly learned one thing -- when it comes to breaking promises, politicians have got nothing on football management. there is no doubt about that. before they all start pointing, we should just remember who it was who said, "we will never introduce tuition fees." who said, "we will never introduce top-up fees?" who said "we will back the browne review?" who is now an organized hypocrisy? >> karen lumley. karen lumley >> following his visit to afghanistan and the review of the military covenant published today, will he reassure me that

his government will go that extra mile to support our troops, who have given so much to our country? >> i am sure the whole house is grateful for what the honorable lady said about our troops. on my visit to afghanistan, i was again struck by just how hard these people are working, and how courageous, professional, and brave they are. they are genuinely the best of british, and we owe them support -- not just them, but also their families. one thing i am pleased we have been able to do is introduce a pupil premium for the children of forces families. i know from my own constituency that many children at schools dominated by forces families leave and go to a different school within each year. i think giving extra support to forces families in this way is absolutely right, and i am sure it will be supported by all. >> george howarth. >> in a incident yesterday at the sonae factory in my constituency, two people working at the plant were tragically killed. i am sure the prime minister

will join me in expressing deepest condolences to the families of those who were killed, and will he agree that when the health and safety executive and police investigations into what happened have been completed, whatever action is necessary will be taken? >> i certainly join the right honorable gentleman in what he says about his constituents and the dreadful accident that took place. it is important that we have procedures in place for the health and safety executive and others to investigate these issues and, as he says, they should follow the evidence wherever it leads. >> ian swales. >> does the prime minister agree that foundation schools are already free from local authority control, and will he meet me to discuss the cancelled innovative project to join foundation school redcar community college with kirkleatham special school, to replace their dilapidated classrooms and provide facilities for the community? >> i know that my right honorable friend the school secretary will be delighted to

meet the honorable gentleman to discuss this. the point is that all schools now being given this greater level of independence -- whether foundation schools or the new academy schools -- should have greater ability to get together to collaborate to invest in their future, rather than always having to rely on a drip- feed from government ministers. >> jack dromey. >> is the prime minister aware that parliament may have been infiltrated by an imposter? the deputy prime minister -- the deputy prime minister -- the deputy prime minister has said he will vote to treble tuition fees and abolish the education maintenance allowance. before the general election the leader of the liberal democrats said he would vote to abolish tuition fees and keep the educational maintenance advance. educational maintenance advance.