tv Newsmakers CSPAN August 28, 2011 10:00am-10:30am EDT
10:00 am
10:01 am
the time has come for us to be politically mature enough to have great comfort in the fact that we can do this challenge if we have to. we cannot do this in silence. we cannot represent you in silence. as a matter of fact, the reason the tea party is so strong is because they stepped up, they talked up, and they worked it. they are not nearly the numbers that we are, but look at the force they have been able to yield in this country. they have influenced the decision of the bill that
10:02 am
literally decided whether or not we would increase the debt ceiling. we have had to suffer all of these budget cuts. if we are silent, we cannot protect the people. if we are silent, we cannot protect the president. if we do not speak up, if we do not show up, and if we do not do everything we can possibly do, our communities are going to be worse off. our children will graduate from college and they will not have any job. we will not be able to get mortgages. we will not be able to create the wealth. we will not be able to force these banks who took our or bailouts you're not giving money to our businesses -- took our bailouts who are not giving money to our businesses to expand business. i do not want you to feel uncomfortable. i do not want you to feel in paris. i do not when you to sink back in your seats -- feel embarrassed. i do not want you to sink back
10:03 am
in your seats and say, if we questioned the president or anyone else, we are doing something bad. it is honorable to step up to the plate. it is honorable to get something done. to not let anyone tell you cannot. does that answer your question? >> good morning, and welcome to "newsmakers." we are alive today to talk about the jobs situation. our guest is congressman emanuel cleaver. thank you for being with us. in our studio here in washington, two journalists, jonathan alan and cut -- peter ralston. congressman, thank you for being with us.
10:04 am
i want to ask you for about the last few months when congressional black caucus members have been openly critical of obama, and especially focused on the lack of jobs in black communities. do you think you will have accomplished anything yet in terms of getting specific action from the it ministration? >> the main reason for the five- city stop and our jobs there is that we have been able to get jobs for some individuals who so desperately wanted those jobs. some of them stood in line from 4:30 a.m. until the late afternoon. in atlanta, we had over 5000 people turned out and 12 had to be taken to the hospital because there were overcome by heat. we do think that the
10:05 am
administration saw what we saw, but more significantly, the entire nation saw the pair are people who are in excruciating -- entire nation saw that there are people who are in excruciating pain because of the job situation, and it might be healthy for them to get involved in helping not just african-americans, but i think they would prefer to do it in a way where they dealt with, for example, the long-term unemployed, or individuals who live in certain tracks, certain census tracts. but to be sure, i think we were successful in getting the attention of the nation and the white house, and congress. >> congressmen, and just wanted to ask you, because of that attention, i think one of the
10:06 am
things that has been highlighted is the tension that african-american voters feel between wanting to be supportive of president obama -- a lot of those voters are democrats, obviously, and proud to have a president who is the first african-american -- but the unemployment rate for african americans is sometimes twice what it is for whites. do you expect there to be more open criticism from members of the congressional black caucus? our constituents saying -- are constituents saying that they will give you room to do that without having a backlash against members of congress who are critical of the president? >> first of all, we're celebrating our 40th year as the congressional black caucus. when i speak to those who were around 40 years ago when the
10:07 am
congressional black caucus was formed, charles rangel and john conyers, they remind me, and i'm glad they do, that there has never been a president who reached the oval office who did not receive strong criticism from the congressional black caucus. president obama has received less stinging criticism from members of the caucus, but these members represent a constituency, and i think they may have made a decision, and that is, i'm going to represent my constituency and try to remain as faithful to supporting the nation's first african- american president as i can. when you try to do that, you're walking between the rain drops. that is not easy to do. however, i do think members of the congressional black caucus believe that they would be negligent if they did not say
10:08 am
that we believe there is a need to give attention to the african-american population in this country where you find 15.9% unemployment. i think most people, economists and sociologists, believe that number is probably in the upper- 20's. when you consider individuals who are under-employed, discourage it and quit looking. yes, there is some tension, but yes, there is some tension, but the tension is only because members want to help the president in a way that we could convert stumbling blocks into stepping stones. we can criticize the policies of the president without attacking somebody-ness.s
10:09 am
the president is a good man, but because he is a man, a human beings, some of his policies from time to time may not meet with the expectations of african-americans, who are part of the american population. >> why should this president do more to target african-american communities? he has to worry about independent voters who are fleeing him in the polls. he has to worry about hispanic voters. he has a lot to worry about politically. politically. what are the ways that the cbc and congressional civil rights leaders can put pressure on him? what are the political consequences for him? consequences for him? >> you just hit it.
10:10 am
i think if things are not changed in terms of how african- americans believe they are receiving some help and attention from washington, i do think that the president will still get 90%-95% of the black vote. the question is, 95% of what? the key right now is turnout. to some degree, a think we have some discouragement in the ranks of african-american voters. they're not going to vote for the republican candidate for a number of reasons. they're going to vote for the president. but i just had a middle-class, african-american woman who i have a great deal of respect for tell me she was not going to vote. she told me she was disappointed. my response is, you will be more
10:11 am
disappointed if you do not vote, because your lack of voting will actually enhance and encourage people whose political philosophy is antithetical to the things that you believe and want. i do think that the president will get a large number of voters, but there is one thing i need to remind you. the president has given targeted attention to the hispanic community, and he should, because they are a part of america and they deserve some attention because they have some unique problems and some unique concerns. what members of the congressional black caucus are saying is that so do we. i would hope, i really, really would hope that this nation has grown past this neanderthal position where, if he is going
10:12 am
to give attention to african- americans, we're not going to vote for him anymore. i would love to believe, and i embraced the notion that america is not there anymore. if we are still there, i think we are in trouble. >> is there a way for you to put pressure on white members of congress, particularly senators, gubernatorial candidates, to be pay more attention -- to pay more attention to jobs in the african-american community? the president will get the black vote, but will clear mccaskill, bill nelson? are you pressuring them, talking to them at all about how to put some more attention on this issue? >> yes, our executive committee has sat down with senator reid,
10:13 am
majority leader read, and we have discussed in great detail proposals we have submitted on the house side and to the white house. that would allow some attention to be given to the depression- level unemployment numbers in the black community. depression levels. i mean, what group in america with those kinds of numbers could be ignored? but yes, we're putting pressure on the senate side, and we believe we're getting some support for the things we are pushing. the problem is the senate has those arcane rules, and now you have to get 60 votes to get anything across. it is unfortunate. we have introduced, we, the
10:14 am
congressional black caucus, 40 different pieces of legislation designed to create jobs. but the reality of washington, which i hope your viewers understand, is that majority means everything, and because democrats are in the minority in the house, none of our 40 bills are being considered. none of them have traveled to a committee. certainly, none of them have come to the floor. but that is not going to stop us from continuing to push. this is a major crisis in america. look, i represent a district about 17% african-american. kansas city is not a city with the majority black population. but i am convinced the people of good will understand that you give attention to your sore thumb. if your other thumbs are reasonably ok and you damage
10:15 am
your thumb, you need to give some special attention. you try to keep from further injuring it and you also try to keep it. -- try to heal it. i think americans coming independents, democrats, understand that. >> can you give a few examples of what you think the white house and the administration should do now? what should the president say in his speech coming up on jobs that would be specifically aimed at curing that sore thumb that you are talking about? finally, what assurances are you getting from the white house that the president will talk about this in his speech? >> whether the president talks about it or not -- and i know he has a lot of concerns and considerations -- we intend to submit to the president, based on what we have learned in this
10:16 am
five-city tour, some pieces of legislation and some suggestions we believe should be included. for example, we believe there is a way to deal with the problem without dealing with race, temporary assistance for needy families. this program has been lauded by a republican governors such as haley barbour of mississippi. he says it is one of the best programs we could fund. in this program, individuals would be hired by private entities, and in some cases public entities, and the federal government would pay 80% of the salary, and the employer would pay 20%. the program is designed to last 18 months, after which, we believe that the county would be better -- the economy would be better and those corporations would be able to pay the entire salary themselves. it would cost about $4.5
10:17 am
billion. i think we would have democrats and republicans pushing the legislation if it surfaced. at the same time, we're hoping to get the white house to consider something that frankly, several of our republican colleagues are considering an believe to be a great idea. i met with paul ryan and jeff hinterland. we propose to them that we will create a legislative initiative that would require that communities that have been persistent poverty for more than 30 years would receive 20% of the grant making agency dollars. that would help us to begin to hire in areas. we never mention the word black.
10:18 am
we never mention ethnicity. we talk about the american public. keep in mind that the poorest congressional district in the nation, the district has the greatest issues of poverty is not represented by an african- american or hispanic. it is a district in kentucky. it is represented by hal rogers. the poorest district in missouri is not kansas city. it is not st. louis. it is in the blue hills of missouri, represented by joanne emerson, which most democrats believe to be a fabulously fair, decent and good person. those are just two examples, but there are other examples of how we could begin to deal with this problem. >> we have heard some criticism
10:19 am
of the focus on green jobs, rural jobs in particular. are there types of jobs you feel are more helpful to the black community? in essence, are their white jobs that are getting the focus and black jobs that are not questi? >> i am not sure their white jobs and -- >> let me put it differently. are there jobs that have gotten focus that are more helpful to white communities and jobs that are more helpful to black communities in terms of the focus from the administration? what kind of jobs should the government be trying to create or allow private business to create ? >> the company that had to lay
10:20 am
off 10 individuals when the recession started, even if they have become home now, they probably are not going to hire those 10 individuals back because things have changed. technology has advanced. companies are figuring out that they can in many cases produce more by hiring fewer individuals. this is the point that people are not going to like but it is critically important. we have got to have job training. not just for african americans, but for sure for african- americans, but for all americans. if we do not, we will get behind. we are in the global economy. we will have got to of a well- trained work force in the united states that -- we have got to have a well-trained work force in the united states that can compete with people in china, taiwan. if not, those people are going
10:21 am
to leave our shores and go abroad. we can also take advantage of what i believe to be the growing industry in this country, which is green technology. in the future, we're going to need people who can audit homes, energy audits, where they can come in and find the leaks, not unlike what plumbers to today. they find the leaks, and then the weather is asian person comes in and whether rises the eatherization person eatherization person comes in and whethe eatherizes te home. those are two jobs we do not have today. we need people who can install
10:22 am
solar panels. this is the wave of the future. if we fail to train the american workforce, we're going to end up having all of the jobs that people could use to further develop this nation going abroad. there are some jobs that we can do now if we can have some equity. if we're able to get a highway bill approved. if we're able to get the transportation tax increase and build our roads and bridges across the nation, and do it in a way that requires states who receive money to demand participation from all citizens of that state, whether they're hispanic, african-american, and if they fail to do that, they will not have any share in the jobs that will be created by the
10:23 am
transportation bill. >> i'm curious if you think there is a fundamental, philosophical divide on some of these issues between african- american lawmakers who have been around a long time and the first black president who is younger and from a different generation than many of you. when he is asked about the economy and the disparities between communities -- is that the divide you cannot reconcile? >> the president has a philosophy, and i have heard the rising tide lifts all boats. but there are a lot of people in poor communities who do not have boats, and the rising tide drowns them.
10:24 am
we have to be concerned about the least of these. i do not think there is a divide based on age in the american -- african-american community. i was the first african-american mayor of canton, missouri. i understand the thinking goes on around the white house because it went around in my circles as well which is, you know, be careful. know, be careful. stay away from too many african- american events. if your film in front of the large number of african americans, it will scare the white. i think our nation has moved past that. we improved the african-american and latino parts of our city, and did it to the cheers of the whole city.
10:25 am
there are always going to be people who do not like the black community. that is always going to happen. those individuals will face the president. but what the president can learn is that those people are not going to vote for you anyway. the haters are never going to come to your side, so you try to do what is right. try to do is going to rebuild the fabric of this nation and make us stronger, because everybody is doing well. 1% of the population owns 33% of the nation's wealth. the average black family is worth 5006 under and $77, according to the pew center -- 56 $77, -- $5677, according to
10:26 am
the pew center. >> what is the country need to do to get to a place where there is efficiency with employers and potential employees so that it does not take a five city tour to get folks hired who are looking for jobs, and to get employers to hire them if they have openings? >> that is a much more complicated issue, because the corporate community of this nation is holding back approximately $2.5 trillion. they're nervous about spending money. consumers are concerned about buying right now. there is so much uncertainty in the country economically, the frankly, i understand the reluctance on the part of the corporate community. but a recession is kind of like a wheelbarrow.
10:27 am
it is going to sit still until it is pushed. the federal government has got to be the pusher. this whole day -- the day we just had about the debt ceiling and the -- debate we just had about the debt ceiling in the deficit was about the fundamental definition of the nation and its government. are we going to come to the conclusion that the government has no role to play except the military. if that is the case, america will not be america very long. the other side of the argument is that the government has the response ability to try to get the wheel barrow moving. once we can get it moving, i think things can happen. you do not say that if a pig is skinny, you take away more food and that will make it healthy.
10:28 am
you feed the pig. that is what we must do as the federal government. we must be the economy to get it moving again. if we do not, this recession is going to linger and become a way of defining the new economic normal in this country, which is not what we want to do for our children. >> i want to come back to what you said a few minutes ago, which sounded like a fairly stinging criticism of the white house. you talked about a fear of offending white people being a consideration when you were mayor. have you talked about this with the president before? >> no. and every african-american office has had to face this.
10:29 am
it is not a stinging criticism of the white house. this is the united states, and that happens. now, i am absolutely certain that there are probably advisers in the white house who are always looking at how the president handles issues related to african americans, because there are people in the population who will interpret that to be ugly and wrong. there has been one member of congress, believe it or not, who has said that president obama is only concerned about black people. i do not think there many other members of congress who would embrace that, but the fact that somebody would say that publicly could give you release some idea about where we are and the fact there would be some criticism of the president, albeit, i think, people who would never ever support the president. support the president.
98 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
CSPAN Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on