Skip to main content

tv   The Communicators  CSPAN  January 7, 2012 6:30pm-7:00pm EST

6:30 pm
>> hi, how are you? >> hi. he is the next generation.
6:31 pm
>> pretty impressive. this explains the right to bear arms. >> thank you. >> he need your help. >> this is my father and my son david. >> hi. >> how are you? >> hi. >> you did a great job.
6:32 pm
we are proud to have you. >> we need your help on tuesday. >> we will be there actuals. >> call all of your friends. >> best of luck in the election. we are helping the homeless veterans in manchester. there are 300 of them. they put these on the ground so they can lie on the ground and sleep outdoors all night. >> that is such a great thing on your part. >> you inspired me. >> thank you, ma'am. >> didn't she do a wonderful job? a lot of what is in there is very appropriate for today.
6:33 pm
>> isn't it amazing how timeless it is? >> i liked everything you had to say and the way you said it. >> thank you. i need your help tuesday. tell your friends, ok? >> i'm in the medical device business. >> tell all of your friends. they are screwed up, stupid and ignorant. >> tell all of your friends in the industry.
6:34 pm
>> ted kennedy was a big advocate. >> thank you. >> come on up. thank you very much. i need your help tuesday. >> you've got it. >> let your friends know. ok. >> let all of your friends know. >> i will. thank you. >> thank you. >> i will step down. let me step down. >> welcome to new hampshire. >> i'm glad to be here. >> we are glad to have you.
6:35 pm
>> i need your help from now to tuesday. go home and tell all of your friends. >> we will. >> it is nice to be here. i'm grateful. >> thank you very much, sir. >> i need you on tuesday. >> thank you. you are a man of bold ideas and i will vote for you. >> thank you. >> you may not be first in new give up. but don't >> i'm not going to give up. thank you, ma'am.
6:36 pm
>> thank you very much. >> thank you for being here but i need your help. >> keep it up. >> good luck. >> thank you. i need your help. >> my pleasure, but you have to sign this. >> sure. tell all of your friends. >> i absolutely will. >> i tell all of my friends. i send lots of e-mails. >> keep e-mailing them. i need your help the next two days. how are you? >> good, how are you? >> i sure need your help
6:37 pm
tuesday. >> you will get it. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> you changed my mind today. >> great. i need your help tuesday. >> would you please sign this? >> sure. i need your help tuesday. >> sure. >> i need your help tuesday. >> it is a pleasure. >> thank you very much. >> good luck. >> thank you. i need your help tuesday. >> one more for the gipper, please. she said one more for the
6:38 pm
gipper. >> tell your friends. i need your help tuesday. keep telling your friends. >> newt, you are my winston churchill. america needs you. >> thank you. i need your help tuesday. >> you have my vote. >> thank you. >> how are you? >> i have never seen this.
6:39 pm
>> i will be right over there. >> that will be great. >> thank you for coming. you've already got my vote. >> we have to reestablish teachers. they have to be in charge of the classroom. but i need your help tuesday. >> we need you in. >> let your friends know the next two days. >> thanks for being here. >> thank you. i need your help tuesday.
6:40 pm
>> quick question. what should our relationship with china be? >> friendly with the people and tough with the government. >> thank you. >> hi. >> this is my daughter ruth. i'm 55 years old and i work in one of the local hospitals. solve the you to health problem. >> thank you. i need your help on tuesday. >> i'm from italy. >> my wife and i love it. >> i would be happy to be there.
6:41 pm
it is warmer. >> i need your help. pleasure to meet you. >> good to see you. >> thank you. i need your help. >> i'm from michigan. >> well, i will need your help in the michigan primary. >> would you take two, please? >> thank you. >> i think my son asked me a crazy question. he had 350 e-mails by dinner yesterday. >> your responses were
6:42 pm
brilliant. >> he made a perfect evening. >> thank you. >> hi, how are you? >> it is good to see you. >> thank you for your attention. >> thanks for the turnout. tell all of your friends the next couple of days. >> we will. thank you. >> good luck. >> i'm rooting for you. this is my wife. >> good. she wants one, too. >> i need your help the next few days. tell all of your friends. >> i will. and we will be watching tonight. good luck. >> i need your help. >> you are going to have it.
6:43 pm
>> thank you. .> this is am wife's >> good. >> my wife sent me on a mission tonight. >> tell her i need her vote. >> don't worry, you are going to have it. >> thank you. >> thank you.
6:44 pm
>> i need your help. >> you've got it. >> good luck. >> i have a picture i would like you to sign. would you mind doing it? >> sure. >> this is my daughter. that is my dad. >> thank you. thank you for being here.
6:45 pm
>> our pleasure. >> thank you for being here. i need your help tuesday. i will be there tuesday. this is tony. he does all of our audio. >> i need your help tuesday.
6:46 pm
>> how are you. >> there is a whole group here. there are about 10 of us. >> we hope we see you in
6:47 pm
pennsylvania. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> mr. gorbachev, tear down this wall. >> good to see you. tell your friends. >> ok. >> thank you, mr. speaker. >> patton was against bringing a new tank on because he didn't want to weaken the troops' morale. >> it showed up very late in the war. individual tank platoons were
6:48 pm
attached to armor ed division i february and march of 1945. >> was it capable of standing up to the german tanks? >> yes. the argument that general patton had was a good one which it was not good for morale. >> how would it go against the tiger? >> it probably would not have done as well as the king tiger but it was almost road bound. >> was the stalin comparable but just too heavy. >> it was technological ly inferior. >> this didn't last very long, did it? >> it was in korea. >> was it used up until about
6:49 pm
1948. >> when i was in the army we had it. >> i grew up on 48's. i remember when the 60 was coming in. that was the great revolution. >> yes. i graduated from v.m.i. and when i was an armor officer we were told we were going to be overrun with hordes of russians and first round hits would be important. >> i helped don story develop doctrine and the whole idea about how you maintain the russians. and my dad served in stuttgart from 1957 to 1960. we forget the german border was gone and all the stuff we did disappeared. >> i will allow my self one political comment and when obama
6:50 pm
was running he never served a day in uniform. >> and had no respect for it. >> tell me the concept of the museum. >> it has three components. it is meant to talk about the american world war ii experience generally. we have a gallery on the far side that is just civilian, the home front, things that people experienced on the home front. then there is a connecting tunnel here that sort of makes the transition. here we do military things. because you are here we pretty much kpwut -- gutted this. we have other tanks up there and we are in the process of redoing the exhibits up here. the navy exhibit is new. >> do you have a sherman here? >> we have an operational sherman, a stuart, an a-7 armored car. we have three tracks. >> you have quite a collection. >> i will take you up there. do we have time? what is our schedule?
6:51 pm
we have time. what are you thinking about? >> he wants to see the tank. >> if you don't mind, i will take a walk up. get the person from c-span to see if they want to go up and look at the tanks with us. >> ok. >> would you like to go with will gingrich and you need to make sure they keep their promise. >> there is probably a way to make it where it is a legitimate experience. >> without making it cumbersome. >> let me look at that. >> thank you.
6:52 pm
>> you were very positive here today. you got a tremendous show of support. let me start again. you had a big outpouring of support. if you go after mitt romney tonight, might that not hurt your chances here? >> well, i'm not going to go after mitt romney. i may define the reality of a reagan conservative and massachusetts moderate. i may describe the difference between cutting taxes and raising taxes, or being right to life and putting planned parenthood into romney care. that is the most i have to do. i don't get there "go after" stuff. they used to say douglas was the
6:53 pm
best lawyer in illinois with a bad case. the trick is try to find a good case. the case is good you can be relaxed and happy. i was for ronald reagan in the 1980's. romney wasn't. that is not hard to say. you can see it happily. i'm happy that i was for ronald reagan in the 1980's. >> you are not worried then about coming across to viewers maybe even in south carolina, florida and beyond new hampshire as negative? >> i don't think telling the truth in a happy pleasant way comes across as negative. it may come across as the truth. you have to ask governor romney how he was about describing his record. >> he has a website and you said it is not-romney.org. how can i run for president and say i'm for romney.org. thank captured it. >> what else will you do?
6:54 pm
>> i don't know. you have to talk to people that know all of these things. >> how concerned are you about mitt romney winning new hampshire, iowa and being ahead in the polls in south carolina? >> i'm very concerned. i think that we have to clarify. we have two weeks to clarify in south carolina that he is a massachusetts moderate and he has a whole series of experiences an values that are the opposite of the south carolina republic party. if we do that, he won't win in south carolina. if we don't succeed in doing that he might win. >> rick santorum will be between you and romney on the debate stage. how do you plan to differentiate yourself from him as the romney alternative. >> i don't. i intend to be the reagan conservative alternative. it is not a me versus. i'm the reagan conservative alternative. i started working with reagan in
6:55 pm
then 74, i helped develop supply side economics with kemp and laffer and i worked with governor reagan as candidate, president reagan for years. i was speaker of the house, i helped develop the contract with america. i think i have a sufficiently positive agenda. three weeks ago, before all the negative advertising i was the front-runner. why would i have to worry about doing anything except going back to what worked and particular out how to get it to work past the negative advertising? >> do you think it is the negative ads that knocked you from that position? >> how closely are you coordinating or speaking with the santorum campaign? >> none. >> you are not a junior partner? >> not at all. >> i don't know enough in detail about what he is discussing to jump into it and i won't jump in randomly about the patent
6:56 pm
office. >> do you think you could have done better in new hampshire if more voters could have seep you in town -- seen you in town meetings like this? >> sure. go talk to the voters who come to ton meetings. we get very high conversion rates at town meetings. i'm delighted c-span covers self because you have several hundred thousand extra people it see them. >> the leader of the southern baptist convention said he and others were reaching out to you and rick perry to get you to drop out and throw your support behind santorum. have you been contacted? >> they haven't contacted me. >> what would be your reaction? >> everyone is allowed to have an opinion. >> [inaudible] >> i have had standard preparation. drink a diet coke, call maggie and robert. get their sophisticated coaching advice. focus in. >> [inaudible]
6:57 pm
>> slower. smile. shorter. clearer. >> did you consult with anybody about what you will talk about? >> i talk to magaziny and robert. -- maggie and robert. >> that's it? >> how many debates do people think i won? you have two debate coaches with a winning streak like theirs. what are you going to do? i could go to some of these guys but why would you when you have maggie and robert? >> [inaudible] some people would say we would rather get a million in tax revenue than that revenue to the state. >> it would go directly to the community on the right of way and they would be able to get the revenue. the question of who owns the right of way in some places it would be a city, street or something but it allows you to avoid the problem of having
6:58 pm
eminent domain over private property and avoid the danger of ruin being the tourist -- ruin being the tourist industry and beauty of new hampshire. everybody i have talked to in the north country prefer this solution and it is one that is worth exploring. thank you all very much. [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2012] [captioning performed by national captioning institute] >> can you comment on son storm's electability? >> no. >> no comment. >> what did you think? >> hi, richard.
6:59 pm

143 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on