it is my honor to introduce a true leader. she has led in the private sector, she leads in the charitable world, she is leading in the debate of ideas. she bravely took on liberal she bravely took on liberal barbara boxer in california. [applause] that is right. she ran against a liberal woman in the most liberal state in the country. wouldn't it be interesting if she took on another liberal woman in 2016? it is my honor to introduce carly fiorina, the chairman of the american conservative union foundation. [cheers and applause] >> ♪ easy come, easy go now we on top ♪ >> thank you.

you know what makes me mad? liberals who say we don't care. are we sick, are we really sick and tired of hearing that conservatives are waging a war on women or we don't care about the poor or we are all about the 1% or we do not care about the little guy. the truth is liberals who are willing to sacrifice other people's lives and livelihoods at the altar of their ideology. [applause] you want a few examples? you have all heard about the terrible drought unfolding in california. it is real, but the disaster there is completely caused by failed liberal ideology. california's population has doubled in the last 40 years, but liberal environmentalists and their liberal political

allies have refused to allow a single new water reservoir or water conveyance system to be built in the same 40 years. the result of that -- 70% of the rainwater, the rainfall each and every year washes out to sea. to make matters worse, the decisions about how to use this very limited precious resource of water that californians have -- those are not made by californians. every single one of them is made in washington, d.c. each year, people are told you get 10% of your ration, you get 20% of your ration, you get 30% of your ration. what is the result? the most productive farmland in the world lie fallow and livelihoods are being destroyed. according to liberals, fish are more important than family and food. liberals do not trust that farmers are good stewards of the land. they do not believe that californians can make sensible decisions for themselves.

their solution? send president obama out with a check to provide relief, but do not let anybody solve the problem. you want another example? liberals tell us that global warming is the challenge of our time. of course, it has been so cold lately, they have not changed it to climate change, but the job killing regulations they are spewing out of the epa, they cite the scientific evidence, but they never finished that story. those same scientists who are trying to convince us that global warming is real also tell us that a single nation acting alone can have no impact at all. never mind, say the liberals. let's wage a war on coal and fossil fuels anyway. never mind, say the liberals. we will stop all major infrastructure projects

including the xl pipeline. i have visited coal country many times. i have met hard-working, proud people whose families have worked in the coal mines for generations. their lives, their livelihood, their communities, their aspirations are being sacrificed at the altar of liberal ideology. [applause] let us talk about income inequality. who has made it worse? liberals want to protect us from banks that are too big to fail by passing thousands of pages of legislation and regulation. the result -- 10 banks that are too big to fail have become five much bigger banks that are too big to fail with record bonuses being paid all around, and at the same time, community banks are struggling.

the truth is that big business and big labor have more influence in washington, d.c. today than ever before, and at the same time, more small businesses are failing than at any time in the last 40 years. perhaps liberals are talking so much about income quality right -- inequality right now because they hope you won't notice how much worse they have made it. [applause] and the poor -- one in six people in america live in poverty today. the liberals answer? market food stamps, attack

charter schools. have you watched a protest against mayor bill de blasio who has a crusade against charter schools are now? have you seen those protesters? most of them are african-american and hispanic families in disadvantaged communities who just want their kids to have a chance. [cheers and applause] and the dirty little secret about a minimum-wage hike -- it may help the people who already have a job, but it hurts the people who don't have jobs, and it hurts the people who are looking for an entry-level job and the chance to work their way up. [cheers and applause] and one last example. i am a proud pro-life woman. [cheers and applause] like so many other young women who are pro-life today, i believe science is proving us right every day. i am prepared to accept and respect that not all women agree

with me. i know how lonely a woman can feel when she faces a terrible decision. what we are not prepared to accept is that we are waging a war on women simply because we know that abortion at five months is inhumane to mother and child. [cheers and applause] we are not waging a war on women simply because we believe there is no reason for birth-control to be free. we respect all women, and we do not insult them by thinking that all they care about is reproductive rights. [cheers and applause] all issues are women's issues. we are half of this great nation. [cheers and applause]

women balance the checkbook. that is why women care that we cannot balance the checkbook in washington, d.c. women make the health care and the education decisions for our families. women worry about our own jobs, our children's jobs and our husbands' jobs. we are conservatives. our empathy causes us to recognize that anyone of us can fall upon tough times. we know that anyone of us at anytime can need a helping hand and a second chance, and so we give generously to those in need. ask the poor what they really need.

ask especially those single moms struggling to make it through one more day. here is what they will tell you -- they need our help, and while we know that god gave each of them dignity and self-respect, they need those things from us too. [applause] and they need and deserve a job. [applause] we have profound respect for the capabilities and the potential of every human life. the poor do not lack ambition or intelligence or potential. they are poor because they lack

tools and opportunities. when a person, when any person has the tools, the training, the education to tap their potential, the opportunities to unlock their potential, and the liberty to pursue their own dreams in their own ways, then they and our nation prosper. it is liberals who display a callous disregard for the dignity and the potential of others. it is liberals who are prepared to sacrifice the livelihood of others at the altar of their ideology. it is liberals who believe that some know better than others what is good for you. we here at cpac know that everyone deserves an equal opportunity to fulfill their

potential, we know that everyone has the capability to build a good life. we believe the highest calling of leadership and of our nation is to unlock the potential in others so that they can live the very best life they can. [applause] all of my life, people have asked me what i believe leadership is all about. some people think leadership is about position, title, power. leadership is not about any of these things. leadership is about unlocking potential in others. leadership is about changing the order of things. it is time to change the order of things. [applause]

we declare the end of the obama era. [cheers and applause] let us together lead our nation to fulfill our potential. let us rise together to meet our destiny and be the nation we know we must be. thank you, and may god continue to bless america. thank you very much. >> ♪ easy come, easy go, now we on top ♪

ofand in the best tradition hill buckley, please make your questions biting. it is time to introduce our firing line contenders. today's liberal is an author and a former democratic u.s. senate gentlemen,ladies and . ckey kalb >> all right. is a 10ur conservative

time new york times best-selling columnist, acated fixture on cable news, our firing line the femme fatale, please welcome and coulter. >> thank you. thank you. >> that's fine, right there. >> all right. first segment. i am going to go at you guys a bit first. as a proud graduate, that which class to do learn that the president of the united states only have to enforce the laws on which they agree? a gratefuld that at dead concert, not at the university of michigan law school.

it is a serious point the way -- it is unconstitutional legislating from the white house. the constitution divides the branches. the congress is supposed to write the law. it is very carefully designed. you have senators for six years, and members of the house for two years, that is the old house. stuff,sident can suggest but his only role in the writing of legislation is to veto it. if he doesn't veto it, then it becomes law. that is not what obama has been doing. most obviously, or at least the most talked about, has been with obamacare. most egregiously with our immigration laws. at least with obamacare people talk about it. and, it is a tough one for republicans because we were the ones who fought to get these waivers put in.

obama rejected them very now he is just doing it but in a way that is unconstitutional. he won't apply to congress, he won't apply to unions or big businesses. a very small number of people are being screwed. it is a tough argument for republicans because we want the whole thing waived. how do you complain about him waving it for a 95% of america? yet the democrats who want more immigrants, and particularly illegal immigrants because they need brand-new warders, warm bodies and more votes. have 30 million new voters. i don't think republicans have an obligation to forgive lawbreaking because the democrats need another 30 million voters. [applause]

you have big business. you have yuppies who wanted. in l a they have gardeners even when they don't have a garden. [laughter] cheap.s so those are big groups that wanted. but the only people living on the other side of the american people. this is the issue republicans should be screaming about executive orders on. >> and the president pick and choose? >> no he can't carry it am pretty sure the supreme court will pay him back his ears. that is something i'm pretty sure lawyers are good at. keeping people in the bounds of their power. clerked forever judge, it does not all go by what the rules are. feel in large part due you this guy needs to be reined in? what strikes me is how it

despite the fact that obama is untrustworthy on immigration, he said i can't amnesty the dreamers. then he went ahead and did it anyway. the republican leadership still presses ahead for amnesty, including john boehner in the house. i don't understand why. -- democrats have a perfectly good reason for wanting amnesty. what is republicans excuse? isn't doubling the national debt in order to make america prosperous analogous to russia invading the ukraine to set it free? >> i think the better paradox is reagan saying he was going to tax revenue by lowering

tax rates. we know that didn't happen. um.as reading david fr economic he was an conservative but he based his investments on the vice of paul krugman. our debt is not all that bad. it is due to explode when the baby boomers need their medicare, which is very soon. it is an obvious answer that both parties will gravitate toward. make the rich pay more for their medicare. that will solve the budget problem. it has to be said whenever in liberal says would when you cut taxes, more revenue did not come

into the treasury department. every year taxes went down. cut, more taxes were money came into the united states treasury. the problem was, tip o'neill would spend three times as much for every dollar that would come in. the years spot on this -- of entitlements. we are talking about bringing in 1.2 million poor people per year here. that is going to be sustaining social security? that is going to be sustaining medicare? one thing people haven't noticed , certainly they are celebrating the browning of america on msnbc . they are bringing in people who are not from america, people who

are in theory going to be funding older white people who are getting to the social security/medicare age. i do that is going to last. over/under of the number of years before it is legal to criticize a democratic president? think obama is different from the rest of them. you are pretty depressed picky about who we are going to run next, but then i look at their field. we are not going to have people fainting at joe biden rallies. [applause] you have to lobotomized yourself from all of obama's policies to recognize this, but i do think he is the most charming,

elegant, articulate person the democrats have run for president in my lifetime. ,ake him out of the equation what, hillary, biden, hopefully governor moonbeam, andrew cuomo, and then hopefully we will have free speech with democrats again. moonbeam is not that bad. in california we see what the future of politics is if we have amnesty, which is, the republican party is irrelevant in california. all that stuff about abortion, cultural issues, forget it. it is not in the picture. democrats are governing the state. because of that, democrats have to be responsible. the democrats have been fairly responsible. one party government has worked pretty well in california. now that we have taken the , mr. kalb, your

question for an. looked spentt -- i all day yesterday looking at republicans new ideas. you have a positive mention of new ideas. it is a motley lot of mid-level tinkering with tax rates and allocations and will we find health care to three times poverty, not four times poverty. none of that will do good or in any way compensate for the negative effect of amnesty on the wages of unskilled and poor americans. paul ryan says he's going to lift them up, parties pushing them down with the other hand. what is it with your party? to marco rubio when he endorsed amnesty? he went down in the polls. what is the republican party

persist? >> exactly. it is one of those questions like how high is up. is, you do not hear the truth about immigration or amnesty anyplace in the media. some of the it on blogs. there is no issue that is as of much importance to america and americans that is so hidden from public view as immigration. you're talking about who votes. one of my friends told me yesterday, there was a big ,acebook debate yesterday should we just throw texas out of the union because it is so conservative? they're going back and forth on this, and i e-mailed him back and said that is what amnesty does. it, 24 million conservative voters overwhelmed, gone.

the country does become california, why republicans are rushing headlong into this, some of it is cowardice. they feel like we lost the last are trying tohey get hispanics to vote for them. if you look at the polls, hispanics don't care about amnesty. myth -- who cares about voters? in new illegal all the talk about republicans never black people, i heard of it until i read marco rubio's amnesty bill. we are the party that always stood up for african-americans. who gets hurt most? is hispanics and blacks. republicans that don't understand that, can't grasp that -- mccain, bush.

it is like a zombie amnesty. we can't kill it. they keep going back to it. [laughter] that it is thes lobbyists. it may not be the congressman themselves who want the lobbying, but i think their staff does. mr. kalb?have one for >> democrats have opened the door to this. they want to raise the minimum wage. why don't we raise the minimum wage the way new zealand and australia do? and $15 minimum wages. the chooser immigrants wisely. they give you points on the basis of youth, skills, education, what jobs do we need in new zealand and australia. a minimum wage naturally rises.

i thought you guys cared about the poor working class. >> it is hard for me to defend the democrats on that. there were some senators like prairie populist to opposed immigration amnesty. he was defending working-class wages. ernie sanders opposed amnesty until obama brought them up with a 1.5 billion dollar jobs program. there are some on the left at the new republic like tom frank who says, look, this is a plan for cheap labor. we are on the left, we're supposed to oppose this. once it passes, all the sudden like tony blair, they will say maybe we made a mistake. then it is too late.

that is the difference between the amnesty debate in the text debate. we can always raise or lower taxes later for don't like it in, wants to let people they are here. there are no do overs. >> it is more important than obamacare. jordan came out in those years. id once called this note -- harry reid called anchor .aby law insanity of course it is insanity. there were some good democrats, but now i guess they just think screw the country, screw low wage workers, we want our 30 million voters. >> it is the triumph of ethnic politics.ver economic as an old marxist, i remember a time in the 60's when people came in and said it is not the

proletariat's account, it is a fact that we are black or hispanic. we said you're crazy, we are marxist heard it doesn't matter what color you are. they have one. have taken over the democratic party. >> another issue. do you have a question for mrs. coulter? even charles murray agrees that america is coming apart. i right wing friends agreed that, my left-wing friends agree with that. culturally, the rich are growing very distant from the port in behavioral terms as well as money terms. this is murray's thesis. the rich have two-parent families, the poor don't anymore. does anyone on the right have a solution to this problem? >> yes, i think murray does. i think part of the problem is -- and i completely agree with him on this -- you leave these

-- you read these terrifying divorce statistics and you find out they're completely different for college-educated people and those with only a high school degree. rate justmotherhood feeds upon itself. the one thing that has really changed besides -- you have the government subsidizing bad behavior, you have hollywood rewarding bad behavior, but there's also an overwhelming cultural sense, there is a political correctness to and shaming. no, shaming is good. it is almost a cruel and selfish thing, for lack of a better term, for the upper classes to be educated, for the college graduates to refuse to tell poor people keep your knees together before you are married.

that will solve some many of life's problems. witho, you're interfering their cultural mores. friend steve sailer has written about the problem of littering in immigrant communities. in the 50's, apparently all americans littered a lot. who started a campaign shaming americans out of littering with the keep america beautiful hat, it was the corporations themselves. they were producing these products with disposable cans and he didn't want it all over the landscape. it was anheuser-busch and other companies i got together and funded ads to shame americans out of littering. now at all of these national parks in california where the littering is coming from recent

immigrants, we can't suggest that anyone group is doing it. let's just shut the park. what they're doing. this is always the solution now. we don't want to stigmatize anyone. sometimes stigma is good. they stigmatized smoking out of existence, how about stigmatizing unwed motherhood, littering, running across the border illegally, how about stigmatizing it? can we just do that? ofi look i have lost track whose turn it is. the sticky question from the audience. this is a question comes up every year. it is the marriage proposal. if hillary clinton does not run, are you a biden man? >> i am definitely not a biden man.

despair of my field until i look at your field. i voted for obama twice. i voted for him last time, i thought he would enact obamacare and i thought he would not get amnesty done. so far he has not disappointed me. me that all of the republican candidates, inc. looting ted cruz, will sell out on amnesty. there is not a single republican candidate who will not ultimately do the corporations bidding. the only hope is to elect another democrat so republicans will resist this the way they are resisting obama. iat said, the only democrat have found attractive aside from obama in the last few cycles has been addressing dell -- has been he has ideas and

obviously, he has broad appeal. [laughter] >> here's a question, who is your pick for 2016? >> well, this response to something miki said. this, way, right before you and i had a vicious debate over which one would be more enthusiastic about amnesty. mccain or obama. i will admit, it is close in the end. look, obama is trying to do everything he can. it is not elected republicans, it is the american people who are stopping republicans. probably theis best hope for our candidates. mickey used to think everything

was about sex. now i say it is but immigration. how we have tois pick our presidential nominee. a little footnote, that is why mitt romney was my favorite candidate. he was the most aggressive on immigration, and in a way that , in thatappealing first debate he had one of the best answers. if at two weeks to write an for illegalas immigrants. no, i will said, appeal to hispanics away republicans always have. we are offering freedom and liberty any chance at a better life for you and your children. in hispanics that are here for a handout are not voting for republicans, anyway. it was a beautiful and perfect answer. --ade fun of self different

of self deportation which i never understood. of course that is our solution to immigration. you can't believe these fake what most americans support a path to legalization. up illegal to round immigrants at gunpoint, put them send them home ripping children from grandmothers, or would you like to put them on a path to legalization where they have to learn english and take lessons in patriotism and payback taxes, of which there are none. they will be getting money back on the earned income tax credit. there is no politician in washington who is suggesting rounding anybody up. we didn't round them up to get enforcehere, we just

and verify. -- when jobst up dry up. every conservative remember this, what joe wilson got in trouble for and everybody is hysterical over joe wilson at president obama's address when he yelled out you lie. obama stood up to the state of the union and said no illegal immigrants will be able to get obamacare. in a moment of passion and rage, joe wilson yelled out, you lie. we found out this week that joe wilson was right. obama was lying. announced that illegal aliens should sign up for obamacare. as will not be used to deport you. i think the only way to get republicans other than romney

running for president, it is the damnedest thing with republicans. you think he is so good and taxes and national defense. i think it has to be pressure from americans. the reason americans often fall down on the job is that you will not read anything about this in your local newspaper or see it on television. that is one thing i will give the amnesty and mass immigration proponents. they know, let's not talk about it. let's do it all hush-hush and try to slip it through. the more people know the truth , the childrenion under the dream act include young man who snuck across at age 17.

some of them are in their 30's now. throughout history, most immigrants are young males. they will send for their families later. this nonsense about families being broken up and, oh, the children. it is not like people are crossing the border illegally in the backs of trucks, hiding in barrels, running from the border guard. it is not like they didn't know what they were doing was wrong. everyone acts like they stumbled into the country. oh, gosh, i didn't know that was illegal. >> that's why it was so onappointing to me reading november 15 where romney in an interview with fox latino and doors to the path to citizenship and legalization. i tell you, and, everybody on your side will sell out on for jeffxcept sessions.

>> we are right about at the end of time. liberals and democrats in 2014. >> you just made it. >> how do you win in 2014? win. are not going to [applause] at this point with obamacare, it is like the iraq war, the fastest way out is to go through. the best path to certainty as to get it done and then we can fiddle with it later once it is up and running. obama will not reduce amnesty. the best chance of not producing amnesty is that republicans will stand up to him because they do not trust him. you're supposed to pay a fine to

qualify for amnesty. obama will waive the fine. there will not be a fine, everybody knows that. those two bigfor things is to vote for the democrats. votey should americans republican? >> it is the only way to repeal obamacare. i keep hearing people say on tv, oh, don't get underway. it is falling on its own. nothing falls on its own. we have all kinds of heinous government programs. public education, the amtrak food service, the post office, the irs, nothing ever falls on its own. the only way to get rid of obamacare, and by the way, i am an individual out there, i am part of the one percent that did not get a waiver. wait till it comes to you. you are not be able to get an english-speaking doctor who went to an american medical school unless you leave the country to find one. maybe on an indian reservation. that is going to be an argument

here the only thing that is going to hurt it is -- obviously i am a disappointed republican. the only thing that matters more is immigration. it is game over. by the way, every republican voted against obamacare. there's no trying to figure out is he going to vote against obamacare? some are better than others. weon't like hearing him say are going to keep the good parts of obamacare. what is that? is forever. i think you have to vote for the republicans one more time and make it clear that if you pass , then wethat is it have to vote in death squads for the people who wrecked america. >> that is it. i want you to thank our two guests. [applause] >> thank you.

the cheap seats are jammed and the premium seats are not. what does that tell you about the republican party and the conservative movement? [applause] not something we already did not know. this is really an exciting town. future whyk into the to pollsters, strategists. one is a republican strategist whit quit heirs -- named other one is pat

fidel. everyone knows him. television when former president clinton was having difficulty with his private life. now,u look on the internet you will see that caddell says he left the democratic party in 1988. another site says he is a democrat pollster. we're going to embarrass him when he comes on here and ask him, which is it? , why?is a democrat the me tell you a little bit about myself. i was the chief political correspondent for the washington , becauseil this moment i'm about to leap to the results of the washington times see pack

poll. have you ever gotten the leaks before? take, i said. come are received. is everybody seated? see pack attendees are skeptical, according to this poll, about barack obama. [laughter] i thought you would be shocked. shocker, and this really is. among see gender gap cpacattendees -- among attendees. i still have more to do.

there andto move over andllut pat fide yres. wait a minute. out? are you coming in the center.t you take the see to the right. pat, are you there? is pat still in the house? [applause] ok. i am going to ask for a very

brief statement from each of them. how do you want to be thought of by people? >> today or in general? >> not every day, just right now. >> i just wanted to hear what i have to say and understand that i am trying to present something new to them. we will find out how they think. what do you want the audience to think of you as? >> how about at the end of my career as a look act on it, i have worked with a lot of really impressive political leaders and strong conservatives. when hewith marco rubio was in asterisk against charlie crist. marco rubio is the ronald reagan of the 21st-century. i would love to be known as president marco rubio's pollster at the end of my career.

>> this is an object is -- this is an example of an objective -- [laughter] anybody out there that wants to text questions to me, do it to @cpacnews #callowpanel. >> if we could call the slides up, we will just take a quick look here at what is happening .o america in the future we will take a look at the challenge facing conservatives as we go forward. while they are calling them up, let me just

thank you all for showing up here. his 60 three degrees, it is sunny. it is the best weather in washington we have had in weeks, and you are here woke listing twos panel. that is hard-core. i really do appreciate it. let's take a look at the challenge facing conservatives as we go forward here. 2012 presidential election by racial category. on the far left you will see that mitt romney won a landslide among whites, not hispanic white voters. he won 59%. that is a higher percentage of whites then ronald reagan one in 1980 when he beat jimmy carter. you look across delaware, you'll see the african-american vote, which was almost unanimous for barack obama. you will next see the hispanic vote, which was overwhelming. some 72% for barack obama.

the city asian vote which was even more than the hispanic vote for barack obama. asians voted for bob dole in 1996, but they voted overwhelmingly for barack obama. you see the other race on the far right-hand side of the chart, which will tell you that races other than white footed overwhelmingly for barack obama. now, this is a problem. weiss is a problem? this is -- why is this a problem? the margin is very dramatically -- it makes a huge difference whether you get a gigantic margin or a small margin, particularly in states like nevada, neworado, mexico, increasingly georgia and north carolina. what we see here is that mitt romney got the lowest for

centage of the hispanic vote of any republican candidate in a two candidate race since watergate. now, in the 90's you had ross perot dividing it up, but you will see that the to the red. that is george w. bush in 2004, winning not only 44% of the hispanic vote naturally, but a majority of the hispanic vote in the sunbelt states. some conservatives are discouraged about the prospect of winning hispanic vote. george w. bush said showed how to do it, as have rick perry and many texas republicans. they demonstrated how you can do it. how did bush do it? very easy. he reached out aggressively in the hispanic community, he advertised on hispanic tv. spanish,a version of sort of like he spoke a version of english. [laughter] it can be done. he demonstrated how to do it

very at why is that important? percentage of the national electorate that is white is declining at an increasing rate. does is go back running for pat was the carter administration. when clinton was president it was also still overwhelmingly white. the second 16 years from 1996 up to 2012, whites went from 83% down to 72%. they declined five percentage thets in the first 30 -- first. whites are declining at an increasing rate in the electorate. now, we have some good news. we are going to have a great 2014. ribbon to hold the house, we will pick up the senate, it will be a great funny 14.

great auntie 14 a great 2014. rather than 72 it will be about 75 or 76. this is a chart of americans alive today by age. if you look at this, the oldest people are on the far left and you will see evil who are seniors are overwhelmingly white. on the far right-hand side of the chart, americans alive today who are age five and under, that is 52% white, not 88. a quarter of the kids alive today in america are hispanic. about 15% are african-american. all you have to do is take this chart and have the younger people replace the older people and you will see a revolution that will occur. this is a census chart for what

is going to happen over the next 50 years. the top line is the percentage of the population that is non-hispanic white. 62% on the left-hand side of the chart, you will see the red is hispanic, and you'll see that growing dramatically. many of you are young people. when your kids are getting ready to apply to college, whites will be a minority in the united states population. does that mean for conservatives? to me, i think it is an opportunity. some people see it as a problem, i see it as an opportunity. why? improving our condition and those of our families is endemic in the human spirit. that is why people still struggle to get to america, to get an opportunity to better themselves. new immigrants are the single most hopeful and optimistic people about america going forward. >> this is a panel, let's go,

let's move it. work dealshard across all ethnic lines, boundaries, regardless of race, color, religion or national origin. conservatives can be very successful in the new america if we reach out and adopt an inclusive tone, bring people into our coalition, and aggressively campaign in their communities. thank you very much. [applause] >> pat, what did we just here? hear? did we just can discuss what you want. >> what are you going to talk about? let's have a little interaction. this, believe me.

first, i'm glad to be here. first, i have never been an opening act for sarah palin. i never imagined that in my life. [laughter] i was here last year and caused some problems because i attacked the republican consultant lobbyist class as a racketeering not only that has blown the election, but eluded it eluded -- but the system. now, their new strategy is to stand for nothing. i'm on a show, political insiders, a very highly rated

program on sunday nights at 7:30 on fox news. we talk about this all the time. but whether we'll it was the nlrb decision not to contest spending, all the issues, essentially have barack obama produce a senate where he pulls back everything. if we say nothing and do nothing we will win in 2014. ,hat is a hell of a way to lose and it has repercussions. i want to see a quick word about an own party because i am apostate for either one of them. i describe the two parties as the corrupt party and the stupid party. actually, they have a lot in common. jonathan turley last week got up. he is a liberal democrat law professor. he said i agree with president obama's programs, but you have

no right to discard the constitution. , where wass me is everyone else? known all speaks up. i've seen this on benghazi and the irs. economics. people appeared the greatest price under president obama on the very basis of his coalition, which is blacks, hispanics, women and young people have had the greatest loss of income, and issue the republicans have not been able to manage. moment about, a the problem. i want to touch on a couple of issues that relates to conservatives. what is the rule of law? -- when harryte as the president

decides that he can rule by fiat without regard to the constitution, something that even a majority of democrats oppose, let me tell you what the republicans did not do. the republican leadership in the ,enate led by mitch mcconnell the ambrose burnside of american politics. that was the worst civil war general who managed to lose constantly. he was always surrendering to the democrats. the republican leadership said hey, we don't like this but we can't wait to get it. republicans in the senate could have shut the senate down and said we will not function, you cannot function without unanimous consent. they could've said we will stand up for the constitution and stand up for principle. and they did not. and they never do. [applause]

there is no alternative, there's no party position their way there was in 1994. the republican party it just presumes you can get i with doing what you wish. the lack of a narrative, a consistent narrative, -- when the president said you can keep your health care, was the greatest lie of the century. -- they say that politicians lie about everyone -- everything. it is threatening democracy. like a majority believe the this islaw is in danger

-- they are threatened just as democrats are. that is why there is no special just -- there's it they were serious about the irs, which should impact every american, because, my god, that is a slippery slope. imagine what will happen in the future. the country does not think there should be there. they gave money to obama. they let the stuff going on. their allies in the establishment wanted to go on. their allies in the establishment wanted to go on. that putinother day

had taken his measure barack obama. and on political insiders the week before he did it, we predicted that he would invade. nobody else is doing that. we don't have time for history say on but i want to national security, there is nothing more important than mine ghazi. -- benghazi. i think john boehner cares about his country. it is about fourth or fifth on his list. when you have 180 members of the thislican caucus -- look, is not about politics. it is about truth. it it is a central truth that is not been addressed. where was the president that night? [applause] and who invented the talking points. heavend not descend from by a fairy godmother. let me say this, you know who i

blame for this, it is not john boehner or cantor. they are taking you for a ride. they have 180 members. they can bring in the speaker, mr. rogers, and mccarthy, and say put in the special committee or be gone tomorrow, if they were serious. they are not serious. this is the problem with our politics. if bob woodruff or live this never would've happened. there are conservative --mentators on my network and this is not about politics. it is about the truth. two thirds of the american people believe there should be a

select committee. 60% of democrats believe there should be. so what the hell is going on here? the political elite, the political class does not want it. i want to react now to what the future is. a system oriented liberals and conservatives, democrats and republicans. i am telling you there's a different paradigm. i will give you the first tenant of it. the first tenant was serious, where the president said do not cross the red line. syria, where the president said do not cross the red line. there was no organized movement. they just had, stop it. same thing with the nsa.

we have people telling us how great it is that they are spying on you. and the young people are going, this is appalling. but we do not have that kind of division. there's a new paradigm. i have been involved in a research project, exploring -- i not here today to go through. i will tell you this. in that black bag -- in that blue bag, which one day will be a black bag is a candidate smith project grade it is about a new organizational politics. based on the 80% of american people who believe the american dream is harder to attain. the two thirds of americans who believe the system is rigged. if you are trying to work hard, you cannot achieve the american dream because the system is rigged. and the two thirds of americans who now believe that, if you

work hard, you cannot succeed. you cannot make it. you cannot change yourself. this file it's everything we believe about america. people who5% of believe their children will have a lesser future than i they had. you are supposed to give your children better than you have. -- therell that idea will still be a united states but there will be no america. that is how we existed before government. of what to do -- but i'm going to redo a conclusion about what i'm working on. the american people believe the system is rigged, that it is corrupt grade these numbers are higher -- and i started this four years ago -- in the 80% or 90%. at least two thirds or 75% or

more who believe the system is rigged. we need real free enterprise. the political class works against the people. we need new leadership grid and three quarters of the american people believe that the government does not operate with the consent of the people. that is a revolutionary moment. that is the difference between the reality of the current where we are dealing with an alternative universe, one of political media and establishment that reflects the current conditions, and another alternate universe, the markham people who reject that -- american people who reject that. they understand that if you do not fix this political system which is corrupt and broken and serve the people in it, you will never do with any of the problems you care about. they will never get solved.

the corruption has got to be rooted out because of the poison in the country. most of all, we need a resurgence in america to return to the dominant true ideology of the american people, which is common sense. that is across the board grid i that 65%-75% of the american people are prepared to him must. i will tell you what they say. the political class and the media and those in the establishment dominate the country. the people are coming. they're coming for you. whether we are going to do that in a positive way. in 2040 or before then we are going to be visited

by a politician none of you wish to have. that moment is at hand. moment as it was prior to the civil war. the change we're looking at will be divisive. whatever they claim to be, they live outside the beltway and are ready to reclaim their country because they have to. thank you. [applause] wow. this.t if these two guys were he won.nts, i would say >> that is all right. >> you are very good. you were great.

i do not care what you say. if demographics are the future o of where the future is going to go, demographic destiny, and that is true, except when it is not true, and inyou live to the 20 40's united states you will live in a socialist america. this is something that neither 's consultants will tell you. it ruins their living. to believe that asians and hispanics vote democratic in such overwhelming numbers because they really want to believe in the kind of tough lines that conservatives give

that self-reliance, smaller government, you're on your own unless you cannot help yourself, in which case, the community should help you. that line is not going to work grid i don't think there's anybody who believes that the reason that george w. bush won hispanics is that he persuaded hispanics that the capitalist model is the best model. plenty of hispanics come to the country because they want the capitalist model. and they do well. obviously, that is true of asians. but if you're looking at big numbers, look at the data. hook up away the boat is going. what does that tell you? -- look at the way the boat is going. what does that tell you? appealrepublicans got an directly to hispanics and asians , the republicans will bring them over, but on what basis?

they believe in self-reliance and are of hispanic and asian origin, arty film away. that is why they came in. others came here for other reasons. they wanted opportunity, but in the welfare state that the united states is. does anybody deny it is a welfare state? i do not think so. where does this go? i would love to hear someone tell me, realistically, how the inevitable path to socialism can be stopped in our lifetime. do i see any hands? >> yeah. right here. what people want is what many people wanted for centuries. an opportunity to succeed. an opportunity to get a good education. better theiry to

lot. socialism does not do that. socialism does not do that. it is the capitalist system with free markets and lower taxes i create that opportunity. >> where they voting democrat? >> because we have reached out enough. if people don't think they like you, they will not vote for you. of people ofinds different races, different creeds, different colors, and origins in our coalition. >> how do we get them? >> let me jump in here. >> we can never win them. this is the failure of the republican party. when you convince people you are against them and not for them, they will not vote for you. the fact of the matter is when i spoke about the candidates in the project, the overwhelming majority included women, single women, black people, hispanics. these people want the american dream. when you have 94% of the

american people who believe the economic policies of both parties have failed and do not deliver better opportunity, what gets feathered is the top where there is capitalism or the people with money. that is what they fear. when the party space for the people with passion, as opposed to preserving arrangements, that is a you change it. the way things are going, the voters are going to vote for somebody who claims to be for them. [applause] agree with him so desperately. in a way, i do. the future lies with the republican party, not the democrats. we know where the democratic party is taking us. we know where the republican party says it wants to take us. a republican standup, ted cruz, or a rand paul, stand up and does something and is

willing to go down fighting, knowing he is going to lose, but standing up for principles to exclaim to the electorate what the republican, conservative, thetalist principles are, party unite against them, makes fun of them, says he or she is the press is the same thing. then everybody piles on. and everybody believes, therefore, that if the republican party really stands up for the principles of smaller government and individual responsibility, candidates like that will lose and take the party down with them. it the republican party is the and ifpe for the future, the leadership insists on , fellowng, ridiculing republicans who stand up for principles, then where's the future, socialism. >> i have to dissent.

either the republican party will reform or it is going the way of the winds. i am sorry. there will be some other coalition to speak to what is there. you cannot suppress the dissent in america, which is what the political astonishment of both parties does. you are right. when people stand up for principles -- the republican party laid down on the debt and spending limits. they did not even protect because theyions decided if we just lay down we will win. you know what? is, more than 60% of republicans are willing to leave their party immediately. it is not about parties. it is about your country. the political class in this town engorged itself by looting the country.

they put party and have country. they put politics ahead of principles. and they put up religion access ahead of patriotism. [applause] >> i think we agree that he has caught the temper of the times in this room. thank you. we will not agree on the future. i hope you're right. >> it is more hopeful than you think it is. >> good. thank you you all. the kind of music just as your soul. i reminisce about the days of old. and that old time rock 'n roll. ♪

there's is only one sure way to get me to go ♪ play that old time rock 'n roll ♪ ,> this is a fabulous cpac isn't it? are you guys ready to take the nation back? you are republicans or independents. future ofs about the your family. it is about the future of the country. it is our generation that will take this nation back. we will take you back for the next hundred years. [applause] on our panel today, you hear

them trended to be americans up into one group against another. women against men. gays against straights. blacks against whites. dogs against cats. right? this is the panel all women. you will know these women. they are working in a variety of ways. think tanks. political commentators. they are in the arena. they make the difference. how many of you are fighting for the country because of your mother? yeah? for your sister? for yourself? this is it. when our lives get better as women, everybody's life get better, right? when the world wants reform, turns to women. that is because of the understanding of the quality of life. how many of you have loved one serving in the military? yeah?

you want a commander in chief that has a set of rules that allows the loved one to kill the enemy when they can, don't you? how it has been the boys who have been infantilizing this nation. we know about babies. we know have a grub. we understand about the economy, don't we? you or your children to live under your reef, not in the back seat of your car. you want to take your child to a pediatrician, not a community health care center that takes three months to get an appointment when you do not know what is wrong. if the levels watching this program -- it would probably be helpful advice didn't still for a second -- are excited because they see weak men running the republican party. pants on fort your the conservative women who will take this country back.

for the men in the audience, i know, i see some the men starting to look little frightened. [laughter] us you guys going to be with as partners in the third manager -- adventure? are you going to stand next to the woman you love, and the women part of your life, the women you do not know yet? you to theoduce panel as an example of the kind of women who are fighting for you and who will, as they work through think tanks, you with media and commentary, help shape public opinion, and entered the arena themselves. theina schaeffer is director of the independent women's form. she's a contributor to forbes. her background is in public opinion research. her values are limited government, personal liberty, and economic freedom.

there she is. i told you to put on your seatbelts. crystal right is a triple threat. woman, and aack republican living in a democrat nominated city. she is a communications consultant. editor and publisher of conservative black chicks.com. will you remember the name? you can remember that. [applause] woman you're more than smile with who has been helping to save the nation. .ate open chain -- ope she is the vice president of the young america's foundation. she was the chair of the republican party of virginia from 2002 to 3006. she was the first woman to serve

in a post. you can see her and talk soup, as well. and perhaps of the grubman college campus. -- on your college campus. and a young woman in the arena. garcia. she serves in the house of representatives, the republican national committee named a rising star last year. she is a candidate again. she is running for the second congressional district. as i move over here to manage his conversation, to all of you remember 2010? yeah. ages for the first time in voted in the majority for a conservative candidate could we mattered in that election. we took that election. we will take 2014, as well. >> that is right. >> we hope so.

we will have a few comments from each of the women. and we will have our own, the five. we do not need bob eckel, do we? >> no. >> we were talking earlier about the nature of your work, sabrina. here's a town full of women. there are some more on women. left ring that was. what is it about gender differences? >> we need to talk seriously to women and realize that that is not gender politics. so many conservatives respect that many women are different. how many you kids? i have girls and the sun. they're different. the girls love their pretty in pink culture. a son will kill anything with

one inch radius of them. we embrace the differences. in the political sphere, we forget around it. the way that men and women respond to messages, their intrinsic values, they will be different. we are equal, but we are different. >> i've so may questions already in my head. i know a lot of you do, as well. when we think about differences imagery, we have a focus of needing to take the nation back -- to do that it involves collections. what about women in the vote? for midterm women voted as the majority for conservatives. they were not organized to do it. nobody told them to do it. we did it because it was important. what about the upcoming midterm vote? >> the republican party does not have a great record with women.

mitt romney lost by 10 percentage points. it is an optics problem. why do we allow men to talk about our issues? too about child-rearing, reproductive rights, what is happening in the home? why do we have men in our party talking and not great terms that is not helpful when you're talking about race, ends bond to a as abortions, i will not visit the names of these folks, you see great woman on the stage right now. aboutduct very well women's issues because we are moms, we are independent business we're running for office. at a basic minimum it is an optics issue. we rate women in congress. we need more. we have 19 women serving in the house of representatives. we have great governors. we have four senators. why want the republican party get it? let us put our faith out there.

otherwise, i've got news for you. the democrats are changing. 4/10 households with kids under the age of 18 are headed by single women. we had to stop sending a subliminal message that if you and bearing kids than people like men who do have children. you know i am do not have children? because that tells me to be whatever kind of woman i want to be grade that is a great point. that is a great transition to the issue of messaging. for us as women, we are dealing with a dynamic here where the conservative ideal is what allows people to live the life they want to live. none of us are the same. we are all going to make different kinds of choices. it is only the conservative ideal that allows that. you, kate, what when it

comes to how to confront what was laid out, would you say? women meme,war on people are saying, and has run its course. the messaging doesn't work. that is our head in the sand, folks. in virginia and the last election cycle, we got kicked by nine points. ken cuccinelli was by nine points. he lost on the war on women attack could get the ideas on our side. we can articulate. there's a vacuum when it comes to women's issues. if women in america think that republicans and conservatives hate them, they are not going to vote for them. it doesn't matter what they believe on economic policy. asare being for trade misogynist. and with that they are not going to vote for us. what we did in virginia was a

huge mistake. i hope every candidate takes note of it. every time a women's issue was mentioned, a vicious baseless attack, you not our guy did? our candidate for governor did? he did nothing. he did not respond. the message was, do not talk about it. women don't care. they don't hear you talk about it. don't talk about it. you have to respond when somebody hurls vicious invectives that you. the violence against women fact. prime example. if somebody says ken cuccinelli as opposed to the violence against women act and he talks about economic policy, that is just hang out there. wait a minute, he doesn't care about women being safe? we need to say, i believe in genuine protection. i do not believe in paying trial lawyers, which is what the violence against women act was all about. this is my proposal for

combating violence against women. do not leave the myths hanging out there. know -- if youl have been around, it is been at least 50% women. .f you see the audience do you see the young people also? the reason there is his attempt to cast republicans in that way is because they know women matter. you will vote for your family and the economy. you're not going out there we can smokegreat, pot now, too bad we live in the back seat of our car. these are basic things that speak to the future of what we are doing. all generations, whether it is about health care or the economy, or anything else, it is interesting -- now we go to you marry linda, the nature that men are running but not even being advised by women.

we talk about the number of women in office. but you have an interesting story. you are a young woman, a minority woman, and you ran and won. you are again. how did that work for you? >> as a college student, i had my republican values intact. i believe in personal responsibility, individual freedom, opportunity, all those good things that resonate. >> president, 2016. we have a right here. >> the basic civic responsibility was to vote and elect candidates and get involved in campaigns for those who represent my values. when i graduated from college i thought, let me get involved in a midterm election. my take away, and what i try to do now, is point out that someone suggested to me, wait a minute, instead of helping, why don't you run?

that thought never crossed my mind before. there's a lot of data from the private sector and public sector, that women are less likely to ask for a raise, to ask for promotion, and run for office. thinking, you know, i should be president. women are busy doing all the important things they do. they volunteer because they're passionate about an issue or whatever the case may be. i story is iran, and through i was able to ply those policies and be effective and i policies -- apply those policies in thoseective in policies. i'm going on eight years. thank you. [applause] i found that working on the reforms, i've been able to achieving continued to work on

this in my state. my federal representative is part of an adversarial federal government. now's the time to try to stop the obstacles from my development from being mandated for washington. i decided to run for congress, i guess my first term liberal congressman. that is what i'm doing now. thank you for that. we have a general sense here that these are women you are from ireland. you can relate to them. this is not unusual. there are powerful women everywhere. while womenction, were important, it was the messaging from women to the rest of the country. let's open it up for conversation. let me put this out there. we know what the problem is,

right you guys? there are some weird attempt by people that these things can be controlled by polls, or strategy, or there's some genius out there, the einstein of politics is going to explain how to speak to women. is men about that we understand what those messages are? sabrina is a part of your message? >> yes and no. we are outnumbered and outspent. emily's list. the national women's law center. women's voices, women vote. the list goes on and on. the amount of resources they have, we are like little pill bugs to the big earl appeared emily's list raised $52 million. they have over a decade of serious social science research into how to reach women. i do not think we need to go to

those lengths. there is a lot that we can guess that. the we are not in the position to guess anymore. to find out what actually most women. that men andu women do not respond the same. they might want the same thing. lee terry but the research we did good when you talk to women security,rving social that is what gets them to 12 cut back on spending. i want the security. we go withwhere women know. isn't about that we know about the economy? we know about safety for our families because our children go to war. we were about whether they are warm or whether there's enough money. look at the page x, your bank account, your health insurance has gone up. we are not -- think back to

the 2012 election when obama was recruiting female celebrities. he was presenting government panacea that all women want. mitt romney was silent. of you have a stage full right women doing different things. we could say, do you want to be dependent on government? your point, the economic policies of individual empowerment work as a woman, minority, gay person, or straight person. we are not talking about pushing back in the messaging. there is money there. -- and i dothers agree with what sabrina was the koch but th

brothers are putting him millions of dollars. but they are not using the talented aspects. one poll to wrap this up. there was a poll that found that the defect percent of americans think the gop does not understand women. when you call women alone? it goes to like 60% of women in america think we do not understand women. i'm going to say something that is going to upset people, but, hey i try to put it up there. part of that is basic optics. how do we start this conference with one gender representing the conservative party? there was one gender representing the party. the womennot have all on one day. it is great we of women, but we need to mix it up a little bit. andwe need to have women minorities see themselves reflected in the face of the party. [applause] >> for you watching at home, and

for you he or, this is not a spectator sport, is it? it is about being hard. you know us, but you know the powerful women in your own life. you are a powerful woman. make them hear you when it comes to how we proceed. >> i want to say something about the. we need by and for men and women within the movement. ,e need everyone to understand though statistics you just heard are damming for conservatism. if women do not think that we represent them, we've to do something about that. i know were a lot of folks are coming from. 10 years ago, i would've said, i am not talking differently to women. i believe in fundamental ideas. >> me too. >> i have changed on that. women think we don't represent them. we need to change how we talked women. women. to

are we reaching up to women? gun control. do you want your daughters to be defenseless and not be a will to defend themselves? >> that is a woman's issue. >> but we run away from it. i want to say one thing about what she said about running for office, how women need a little lecture push. she is right. i started a women's leadership training program. said, -- 25i successful women would run for office? up.timid tiny hand went that was after eight months of training and how to network and raise money. i said how many of you would run for office, every hand shot up proudly and boldly in the air. we need those women to run for office. that is the key.

we have the message, though we lack the messengers, not because they don't exist, but because they're busy doing other things of value in society, and in our public sphere. what we have to do is get them to channel that and run for office. that way it is not artificial we say, ok, we need a woman and we need to use her face. like obama did with celebrities. that is not what we want. we want to take the flotilla we have and empower the women. we need to ask them to run. we have got to back them up. they're going to be attacked more viciously than any of the male candidates. the men have to be backing them up, whether you like them or not. -- back them up. ourselves.cond guess we do not want to take a

leadership role because we are socialized not to. 26% of all the funds raised during the midterm election. pull-up those wallets. any women running, give them five dollars for pete sake. that is a gallon of ice cream. you're going to learn how to reach all these women. it will be someone like her from utah the take the country back, right? midterm of 2010 and the coming up, women made that historic revolution happen. women led the tea party, which are the stakeholders of the country, speaking about economic issues, about our families, canada translate to 2014 -- can that translate to 2014? detailed response.

what about the point of view of women at the ground level, at the foundation when it comes to what we understand extinction instinctually? >> we saw the gender gap close. that scared democrats. no doubt heard it is going back to the message. it is about not running away. , remember in the 2010 election , and she a question was unprepared. guess what? of republican9% candidates are still unprepared to answer that question, to talk about the wage gap, they are uncomfortable because maybe they great intro toa it. this good discrimination exist? yes.

we have the start wrapping our minds around this, getting comfortable with it, and getting out there, whether you are man or woman. we stop a lot of men in office. >> is not the difference between a conservative message in the liberal message? difficult. women are required. we are not moving forward as victims. we are moving forward as congress. attitude ofiberal wanting them to infantilize us. >> that is the message. they do the same thing with blacks. blacks are helpless. life cannot advance, unless we have government to carry us along. is, theto commit that life of julia should be insulting to any woman. why did not mid grommet say that -- mitt romney say that?

why didn't an actual woman say, i am insulted. julian never had a man in her life. should a baby out of wedlock good this is where we went with blacks and women. we talk about marriage, not to say that sometimes divorce happens, and you're widowed. but we need to talk about the benefits of intact families, especially when it comes to minority women. let me give you a really quick statistic. it is heritage that did some research around this, or maybe it was brookings. the power of marriage to give in this a foothold world is irreplaceable. two parents will make sure the child is the hallmark, graduate high school, and we know the advantages. when a woman has a baby out of wedlock, she will never earn as much as a woman who is married and widowed or divorced. that is our platform, right?

we should talk about these issues in a compassionate way. education. young, single moms get their kids out of failing schools. >> it is about educational empowerment. >> the justice department is trying to kill the voucher program in louisiana. >> this is the connection, as conservatives. we want personal freedom, financial freedom, and that these are the kind of connections that make that possible. >> i want to follow up on that. when we talk about these things that are relevant to every woman, regardless of hardy, regardless of complexion or sexual orientation, whoever you are, these things matter. both of you are in the arena. what makes the difference? is it women advising candidates? what makes the difference for the man or woman?

just anyy, it is not woman for the president, it is the right woman. that.n to >> this is about the right woman who understands about economic freedom. how to we break free from this problem? >> you make a great point. we are not appear saying we need to get any women up. we are talking unprincipled, conservative women. i've been talking a lot about articulating a positive message, and a freedom message for message. they are more than the sum of their body parts. we need to go on offense. we need to attack. high are at an all-time for poverty rates right now. we need to point out the destruction of leftist

policies on women in particular. a lot of times we conservative insensitive to single women. divorced women, i am one of them, and it can be rough. there economic circumstances are being decimated by barack obama. he is intentionally doing that. an all-time high poverty rate for single women. a lack of opportunity for getting a job. they are not hiring because of the regulations. but stock about how this impacts individual women. for pete's sake, let's go on offense. we have got to be advising our mail candidates how to talk about these things. we cannot have any stupid comments this year, ok? no stupid comments. think. [applause] you might think you're being funny, but think before you make comments.

can it be used to play into the war on women mantra? we need to go on offense. >> the issue is we don't have control of the media. there are great outlets like the andington times, fox news, investor business daily, but it is an unfair playing field. we know that. that is what makes republicans and conservatives better candidates. we have to be, right? if you're in the field or in the look, you guys are getting sarah palin up. a little bit. [applause] there is a reason why women candidates resume. you are in the arena. and as a result, you are a role model. you're not a bureaucrat. how does this translate when it comes to your power? this is about power, ladies, right? how has this affected you in your work? >> i had an instance when i

first entered the race. within 24 hours i was attacked on twitter from a democratic colleague. >> of course. those feminists. >> they made references to me and my physical appearance. letterad a fund-raising come out. and they all commented on me as a threat because of my values, they said. but we know because of what i am body. the way i responded to that, and which i think is true and something we have to take him point out, people are upset with gridlock in washington, and the lack of good people up there, and all the things they say. , as a society, and

particularly, coming from the us onwhy do they attack petty and personal things? this is the reason why good people do not run for office. this is a reason why women do not run for office. who wants to deal with that kind of thing? [applause] >> you raise a great point. and there were reprehensible said about you. and there were women and women of color who went through that. they do this because the left wants you out because you break the stereotype that minorities are supposed to be with the democratic party. you're supposed to be enslaved. women, butust really, where are the men in our party leadership. they need to come out quickly and swiftly. >> michele bachmann?

did they ever defend michele bachmann? >> it is never cold talk about race and laugh. and you have to come to the defense of women like her when they are out there. like you said, women do not want to run. it is just going to discourage them. we need leadership to condemn this crap. seriously. i am sorry. the actions need to be caught up. it has to be said it is not about the commiseration. -- victimization. it is not about that. it is saying, i am going to represent the and to that. i am going to keep fighting. it does not matter what people say about me. and it is about the overwhelming support and feedback. >> sabrina, we will go to you on this. this is beyond ourselves in a

big way. we have to move into an uncomfortable zone in finding our better selves and more aggressive cells. selves. if your home is in trouble, if your children are in trouble, there's something inside you that would frighten them. there's something animal and there. to be powerful, to be secure, to be in control, we do it with a smile, while being as attractive as we can be, right? is that what we see? we do not have to become like the left. and use themlues to take this country back great -- back. >> i know we're running low on time.

we need to embrace the idea of fairness. the left does not own that idea. fairness is the best predictor of a woman's support for big government. that is more than her gender, more than age, more than any demographic variable. a perception of fairness and equal opportunity versus equal outcome. she will support laws like the paycheck fairness act. we have to turn the conversation around. is it fair that you have to sell your house to change the school that your child is going to? is it fair that we have a $17 trillion debt settled on our children? no. i have a husband. i have a father. i have a son. we do not live in a vacuum. what is good for me is good for the men in my life and vice versa. we have to stand up for work in.

they're being beat up on stage. that is absurd. >> how can people find out more about what you're up to? >> iwf.org. >> and you can order my book at the bookstore. >> fabulous. >> we as a party, what do you talk about women, men, straight people, gay people, i do not care what. we need to talk about what we are for as a republican party. i know others have said this. [applause] i was sitting in the audience watching senator paul speak yesterday, and i sat next to a woman. she and i had a conversation about what we are taught met today. she felt alienated. she was frustrated. she asked, what should i do? i fill a cabin up our. it is sad that so many women in our party so powerless. i told her to get involved in your state party or county party. i do not care what. make some noise. let them know that you mean

business. your vote counts. look at all the great women year. we matter. businesso make our card. with the demand seats at the table. if we don't, we will not have more young women into the party. we need young women. she is the future. involvedge you all, it . embrace and women. tell them what we are for. we are for you achieving the american dream. we want economic empowerment. we are for a lot of things. government is not the way. government is bankrupt. the piggy bank is bankrupt. if you want to be a millionaire, you have got to do it on your own. we have the policies to help you do that. >> it is about empowering women versus victimizing them. reminding us that we are the ones in charge. liberals do not want you to

remember that. because then you would take the country back. chick.com.ativeblack mothers andves and daughters. nobody needs to be threatened by any of this. the men in our moment, i think you get. at least those of you here, your clapping. in order for conservatism to andve, we have to take over embrace women. we have to elevate and support them. there are so many ways we can do that. one is by supporting the conservative movement. the policy institute. they're elevating, promoting, and encouraging young women leaders to get out there and take leadership. there are many of them. i mean it when i say we need buy-in. we need by and.

-- buy in. they are amazing. we need buy-in from the leadership in congress. we need more women, conservative women, as heads of committee. where are some of these women who are incredible? marsha blackburn is incredible. there are women in congress that should be out there when free contraception is being talked about. women, talk about these issues. men, but wer white have to promote our women in order to start resonating and in order to start listening to us. divider in chief is my latest book. i wonder what that is about? >> thank you very much. >> i thank you for having me

today. it has been wonderful. my job as a candidate and hopefully having that national platform to progress would be to point out that this administration is promoting equality of outcome. when the federal government does that, you are reducing everyone to the lowest common denominator. we need to be talking about what our country has offered. that is what we should be promoting. that is equality of opportunity. that is what we're all about. [applause] that is the innate genius of america. that is the defining characteristic of americans, that we have an inherent and in andnius for invention innovation and we need to be able to apply that as we want to as individuals in a free society. i am working to win this race.

i would love your support. lease check me out of because i don't want anyone to break the law, the federal max is $2600. [applause] >> look around the room. you'll be looking up the stage for the rest of the night. look around at your fellow conservatives. some of you are maybe not even republicans. maybe your independence. the bottom line is that it is usually crowds about the size that take nations back and create revolutions. our founding fathers created aydin amex where we are able to have our rap -- revolution quietly in the polling place. , personally and how you view yourself, but remembering that when people want reform and nations want reform, they turned to women and they turned to us because we do know what drives the foundation of society, which his family, it is loved ones, it is love, but

also being willing to do whatever it takes to make sure that the next day is one that you own and is safe for everyone you love. that is what the conservative ideal is. individual freedom, financial freedom, so that we as americans can look to the future as something that we will design and no one else. my thanks to everyone of these great women. [applause] ♪ [captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2014] nderdner