Skip to main content

tv   Washington This Week  CSPAN  August 9, 2014 9:48pm-11:01pm EDT

9:48 pm
know that they're listening but i see how my children make different decisions about what they eat now that they have control because they have information about how food affects their overall health and ability to perform. but it's our job to empower parents and families to make the choices that are best for them. >> you've gotten some blowback for it which -- >> it's surprising. >> you get blowback for everything. >> i don't know. >> that was just where i was headed. it is -- i know that you, you know, you both get into these things, you're doing them for the good of the country. and suddenly you get criticized for it. it must be a shock in a way. >> i was not that shocked. remember, we had somebody that lived in the white house that we watched very closely that we
9:49 pm
loved. president bush and barbara bush and so i was very aware when george ran for president that, you know, that you're always going to be characterized in a way that you aren't really. and so i don't think it was any big surprise to me. that doesn't make -- doesn't make it any less hurtful. but on the other hand, anyone in a leadership position of any sort knows you're going to be criticized and it's hard. >> that's absolutely true. that's really the role of leadership. it's not about amassing power. it's taking some of those hits and continuing to do the work. even when it's painful. and sometimes unappreciated. that's why it's important for all of us to have a vision. as first spouses. if you have a vision, you know
9:50 pm
what you're passionate about and you know what direction you're going in, then all of the arrows and the spears and the criticisms, they just, they bounce off of you. because you keep doing the work every day. punched but you patch yourself up and go on. >> it's hard to do what you all are doing. you talked about it's not about amassing power, certainly not for the spouses. it's not being in that role. and still you get the criticism. so it's important to say you've lived through it. >> everyone comes to these positions with different to temperaments. watching mrs. bush, you know, she's been able to traverse all this with a level of grace and
9:51 pm
kindness and compassion, just seeing how our transition worked and we talked about this in tanzania, people are who they are. said this in my convention speech, being president doesn't change who you are, it reveals who you are. which is true for first spouses as well. some people are shy and don't want the limelight. other people are more outgoing, maybe more aggressive and able to withstand the heat of the spotlight that shines on us. i think that all of us, we have to bring what is uniquely us to the table. and work within that. and that's sometimes what people around the world don't understand. first spouses, we don't choose this position. we just happen to be in it. >> we're elected by one man. >> right, right. >> and you can't be fired. >> right.
9:52 pm
>> certainly hope not. >> i guess we'll see. >> you know, one of the things that is unique is your voice as women. you talked about that last year. i went back and looked. you were quite eloquent about how important it is to -- for women to use your voices and your power and i think mrs. obama, you said we're not complicated but we're complex. and i think that's a good way of putting it. but again, mrs. bush, why is it important for women to -- for women's voices in this particular position to be heard? >> for the first lady? i think it's important because the first lady has an opportunity really to talk about what is most interesting to her and what she thinks she can probably help, the way she thinks she can help her country and the people in her country. the best. i love to quote lady bird johnson who said, the first lady has the podium and she intended
9:53 pm
to use it. and she did. it was another texas first lady, and i admired her from a distance, i didn't know her then but got to know her later when george was governor and we lived in austin. but she did. she used what she loved. she happened to love the native flowers and the natural beauty of our country and she made a huge difference. the daffodils that you see blooming here along the george washington parkway were planted because of lady bird johnson. but yes, she used education and civil rights and she was a southern first lady so it was very important for her to speak out about civil rights and she did. she campaigned all across the south for the civil rights laws that were passed and signed during president johnson's administration. >> once again, i always go back to young people. we meet, i know i do, we meet thousands of just wonderful
9:54 pm
young people in our countries and around the world and you know, to walk, to have a 7-year-old a 12-year-old walk up to you or send you a letter and tell them thank you for what you do, i look up to you, you inspire me. that reminds us all that whether we like it or not, we are role models. and as women, we have the young girls in our world, in our countries, they are looking to us. they're looking to us for how we should be, how we should think, how to use our voices and as a result, we have a responsibility to show them the way in whatever way we can. that that may be something as simple as embracing a child on the line and telling them that they're beautiful and that you're proud of them and that you know they're important and they're valued. i think about that. because every time i meet a child i i think who knows what's going on in her life. whether she's bullied or had a bad day at school or whether she lost a parent. that interaction that we have
9:55 pm
with that individual, that child, for that moment, could change their life. so we can't waste the spotlight. it is temporary. life is short. and change is needed. and women are smarter than men. [applause] >> that goes without saying. >> and the men can't complain because you're outnumbered today. >> mrs. bush you talked about that before too. it's a temporary spotlight. but you are now working hard to carry it on. and i think that sense of continuity is very important so you have the -- the george w. bush first lady's initiative, you have the global women's initiative, the women of afghanistan. you're keeping going. >> we are continuing to work, both george and i are, through
9:56 pm
the george bush institute which is in dallas now, at the bush library and museum. it gives both of us a chance to keep working on the issues that were the most important to us. pink ribbon-red ribbon is our global health initiative. many of you know about that. we've launched in three countries in africa and we're going to hear about some more in a few minutes. but because pepfar was started while george was president, the president's emergency plan for aids relief, we wanted to be able to continue global health initiative that builds on pepfar. and when we looked at the cancer numbers across africa and really across the world and saw that cervical cancer which is preventable, is the leading cause of cancer death among african women, we figured out there was a way we could use the pepfar platform that's already established and add the testing and treatment for cervical and
9:57 pm
breast cancer to pepfar. and so that's our global health initiative. it's given us a way to keep building and we have a number of terrific partners who are in the room. so thank you all -- thank you to all the partners and thanks to the first ladies in the countries where we have already launched and where we're getting ready to launch. >> i thought that was such a smart initiative. it really does combine so many elements that are just sensible. you know. which is another thing women are good at. but the fact is, you had the pepfar clinics so the women were already coming in, but you needed, since breast cancer isn't caused by the same diseases, you needed to get somebody else in so you got susan g. komen and the pharmaceutical companies and it's turned out to be a total women's health platform. >> it is really. it's partnering obviously with
9:58 pm
the u.s. government as well, using the, what u.s. state department as our partner because we are using the pepfar platform to add and the great news is that cervical cancer really can be treated. not when it's advanced. which is why it's so important that women come to be screened early on. and then be treated. and then the vaccination programs which -- with the h.p.v. vaccination is important. i think many african first ladies are trying now to manage these vaccination programs so we really won't even have to worry about cervical cancer when these girls who are vaccinated grow up. >> do you think about that, mrs. obama? i know you're still right in the middle of it. >> i hope your no -- you're not thinking about that yet. >> not at all. >> but how you can carry on some of these and talk about your other initiatives too. you have done these private-public partnerships,
9:59 pm
particularly around the military families. >> dr. biden and i started joining forces, which is a nationwide effort to provide support and respect to our men and women in uniform and their families. we have worked with private companies to create jobs as these men and women transition to civilian life. you know, working on making sure they get the education benefits, all the support that they should expect, having put their lives on the line and their families' lives on hold. >> and the medical schools, you're working with medical schools. >> the nurses are becoming trained to be able to identify and support men and women who may have post-traumatic stress disorder. just educating the entire country on what ptsd meansing trying to destigmatize it so these men and women feel like they can seek help when they need it. all of that has been, you know,
10:00 pm
it is a passion for both jill and i, jill is a blue star mom and she proudly says that. she has grandchildren who she's seen grow up while her son bowe was deployed. -- her son bo was deployed. for me this is something i'm going to do long after we leave the white house because these these needs will always be there. i have been able to see through former first spouses and presidents, the platform continues. that is something i would encourage you to think about. how do you lady foundation for the legacy you want to create for yourself? as women, we should not be afraid to talk about our legacies. what we want to leave behind in the work we do.
10:01 pm
so many important symbolic responsibilities we have in our roles. there's nothing wrong with thinking about legacy. what we want to leave for the world. that takes planning. coordination. pat takes her to ships -- artnerships. we shouldn't be afraid to have those conversations. the time will come for me. i will embrace that. what i have seen from the bush family is there is a level of freedom that comes after you are out of the spotlight. it is a new and different spotlight. there is more you are able to do out of office that you can't do when you are in office. >> i remember you saying, you could pick up the phone and calling member of congress and get something done. we are at an african summit.
10:02 pm
both of you have exhibited such a strong interest in africa. helpede very much to -- to shine a spotlight on the confident and caused us to learn about the good news. i'm kind of wondering how you got there. mr. bush, i know you were in 75 countries as first lady. why africa? >> it started when george launched the program in 2000 three. people were dying every single day across africa. it was a pandemic that was going orphaned.he continent he saw it was important for the u.s. to be actively involved in helping in africa. for us, the wealthiest country in the world, both because we
10:03 pm
could but also because we should morally try to save as many lives as possible. i went on that trip in 2003. when it was launched. our daughter barbara was with us. choicesmade her life because of that trip. she is the head of global health core. -- sheages people founded it to engage young people to work in the health field. she has fellows in africa and in the u.s. trip andf that first because of the program, we had a huge interest in africa. we just had a wonderful trip this last march, a private trip. ethiopia.ness trip to
10:04 pm
to visit the christian sites and ethiopia. an importanten continent for us. because of our extremes is there. >> africa is an important continent to the rest of the world. integral to the success of this nation, the u.s., and the world. it is in undervalued, underappreciated continent. upon the world to have a better understanding of what africa has to offer. the importance of africa is very personal to me. because, as the president said last night, africa is home for us. his family is there.
10:05 pm
we have relatives there. we have visited the content on several occasions. we have taken our daughters to his grandfather's village. they have seen a part of themselves. the partnership with this continent means a great deal to us. we have seen the power, the potential. to meet the young leaders and takeow hungry they are to their countries to a new level. that kind of passion is infectious. it is something that young people here should know and understand. we want people from america to travel to africa to understand its languages and a different cultures. not to see it as a monolith. see the investment opportunities. which is one of the reasons this
10:06 pm
summit is so important. it hasn't just been a conversation with we are open -- with world leaders but as mrs. and the nonprofits are here -- but businesses and nonprofits are here. u.s. as atime for the whole to embrace that reality. this is the beginning of a lot of work that needs to be done. we are encouraged and optimistic. >> this week has been very instructive for the whole country. it was wonderful to be in africa. have african leaders here in the u.s. it is educating the country about what is going on there. i'm going to end where we began. coming as the news is,
10:07 pm
out of much of africa, it will not be as good as it can be until we do more. all like to see a finishing word. >> thank you very much. michelle. president obama for hosting me african leaders summit. thank you for inviting the bush institute to be a part of the first lady's initiative. thank you for coming to our first lady's conference. angst to all the first ladies who have joined us. thank you for the great work you are doing in your countries. thank you for the good work you will do. [applause] >> thank you, back at you. laura, absolutely. we are here because of the
10:08 pm
example that was set in tanzania through the summit that the bush institute organized. as my chief of staff stated, when the summit was being organized, we jumped at the chance to do something similar and continue the conversation. to come together as for spouses and continue to be inspired by each other. ist i would say in closing we have to fight for our girls. there should never be a girl in this world who has to fear getting educated. that should be something that is intolerable to all of us. i can only think of my own girls, and we all have to see aughtersughters -- our d in these young girls. we want them to be smart and
10:09 pm
empowered and loved. we want them to be healthy and mentally sound. if it is good enough for our girls, it is good enough for every single girl in the world. it is going to take leadership. women like us speaking out in our countries. making sure young girls are not subject to abuse and are loved and valued. we will notthat, solve these problems. thesting in our women, people who raise our children, the people who take care of families, they have to be healthy and whole. that is the most important work we do. whether we talk about clean energy or economic empowerment. until we value women and girls, we will continue to struggle on this planet. i have high hopes when i look around this room. we will not tolerate that. not anywhere on the planet.
10:10 pm
if we continue to work together and lift up our young people who were fighting for a better will see somek we progress on these issues. i look forward to working with all of you in the years ahead. they go -- thank you. [applause] both so much for the work you're doing. for coming together. you set such a good example for the men. also for allowing me to participate. [applause] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2014] [captioning performed by national captioning institute] schedule's primetime begins with a debate between bill ayers and dinesh to sousa.
10:11 pm
-- d'souza. includedour discussion economics. and >> you started out as a thelutionary, frankly, in bin laden mode. you sound different today. you talked about teaching, being an educator. you talked about socratic doubt. what happened to that old revolutionary? had -- is he still alive? >> i feel like i am a revolutionary, if by revolutionary you mean, if what revolutionaries having a program by which we can imagine a different world, i am
10:12 pm
not that. but if you mean somebody who is willing to dive into the contradictions and fight for more peace and justice, more totainability, being willing live with ambiguity and complexity and move forward, i still consider myself someone who sees the need for a fundamental change. i will give you an example. is atruggle against -- struggle that still goes on. it is not over or ended. it takes different forms. it is not slavery or jim crow. the destruction of voting rights in the -- voting rights and the mass incarceration. >> you can watch the entire debate monday at 8:00 p.m. eastern on c-span. >> up next, a discussion about
10:13 pm
campaign spending and the role of so-called dark money. this is 45 minutes. dave leventhal is a writer for the center for public integrity. what is dark money? s involved in its regulation? that animated a bunch of political entities including corporations and unions in super pac's. they can raise and spend unlimited amount of money.
10:14 pm
they have not had a primary purpose. they were able to raise and spend unlimited amounts of money -- dark money is a term. isis the general term that used for money that is flowing into the political process and used in elections and campaigns television. you know the organization is sponsoring the ad. if you ask a question who is behind that money? it is very difficult to answer that question in any empirical across-the-board way.
10:15 pm
been able tohave avoid having to disclose that kind of money that they are using in the political process in a way that the candidates have to do by law. we have heard a lot about the irs. remind us about their role in regulating. guest: people think of the federal election commission. they are the ones who are supposed to be the cops on the beat. and regulate campaign laws and rules and regulations. if somebody does something that crosses a line that is potentially illegal, they are tasked to investigate. when we get into the realm of nonprofits it becomes part of the irs domain. there is an entity called the exempt organizations division. that is the nonprofit division.
10:16 pm
when you think of a iris you think about the guys who are andecting the taxes bringing money into the government. the exempt organizations division is different. they ensure that nonprofit retainingons are nonprofit or getting nonprofit status in the first place. when you have these nonprofit , these are social welfare organizations were business trade groups that became very political in some cases following that citizens united decision. when these groups are spending millions of dollars to advocate for candidates, it called in the question about getting too
10:17 pm
political. are they violating the terms of being a nonprofit organization? ? why should people care about this if you have a nonprofit that is getting very political and should not have a purpose of engaging in politics, the packs -- taxpayer is given a subsidy. whether you are a republican or an issue.it becomes if this group is politically active and should be registering as a political committee without the benefit of being a nonprofit organization. >> these organizations are spending $300 million in the 2012 election. you can include in your --estigation that the
10:18 pm
we investigated a number of different realms. some of that came from statistics that we got through the freedom of information act and some from documents that we attain from the sources at the irs and elsewhere. we did two dozen interviews with people in high-ranking officials. they have been reluctant to engage in enforcement actions. host: does that predate some of these target investigations it we are seen hearings on? guest: it has accelerated in the last couple of years.
10:19 pm
scandal thathe blew up with the targeting of move totive groups, the go after organizations that had tea party in their name or other identifiable words that would indicate there is a good chance that they were conservative and they were political in some way. the research issue goes back a couple of decades. there has been a systematic bleeding of staffing and financial resources to this one element of the irs. it tracks the slide down from a was a much more robust division at one point to what we have today, which is an organization or an element of the irs that has fewer staffers than it has had a long time. it has less money.
10:20 pm
suggested, the amount of spending that is going on in the political realm by these nonprofit organizations and these new abilities and freedoms to engage in the political process over the last four years, that money has been going up and up and up. it is not stopping. cycle, it4 election is going up at an accelerated rate in a way you can only imagine. muchan only imagine how they will spend in the 2016 cycle. money,esources and more they don't have the capacity to comprehensively look into these groups and make sure that they are following the law. for: as applications nonprofit status have gone up, the number of inquiries are going down.
10:21 pm
thear in the 2014 cycle, amount of dark money in this cycle will eclipse the we saw in the last midterm and maybe eclipse the last presidential election. the center for public integrity. let's go to: in oklahoma. good subject.
10:22 pm
the conflict is created by the , this is a government agency being an arm of the democratic arctic. -- democratic party. unionsiticians and the are ganging up on the taxpayers. detroit shows the that eventually goes down the drain. happeninge same thing throughout government. irs is the lead attacker in the situation. when you talk about dark money, there needs to be all of this brought up. know there was a union cobol in the irs.
10:23 pm
the caller is right in the sense that the situation shined a lot of light into what setting conservative sensibilities on fire. irse were elements in the otherois lerner and information that has come out that there was at some level to some degree targeting conservative organizations. you can debate the merits of whether or not that was fair. there is a major part as an element that came about as result of this. it raises the broader question of whether these organizations
10:24 pm
or the irs is being evenhanded with in-service groups versus liberal groups. for themajor question parties themselves if they feel like they are being treated fairly. talked to the commissioner i have the -- of the irs. ruleseed to rewrite the as it applies to nonprofit organizations to make them more equitable. to make some warfare. -- to make them more fair. these about be proposed until after the 2014 midterms. do not hold your breath, and will not happen until after the 2014 election cycle. happen early in 2015.
10:25 pm
it could have some effect on the 2016 election cycle. we will obviously have a pretty -- presidential race. involvese of this defining what political activity is under irs rules for nonprofits. guest: absolute. this is something liberals and conservatives are concerned about. if you are in a football game and you are told that maybe you need 10 yards for a first down but it might be eight or 12, the teams are going to throw their hands up in the air. they need a certain measure. many liberalk to and conservative groups, the agreement is they want the rules to be consistent and for the
10:26 pm
rules to be well-known. purpose,n of primary it is very fuzzy. half of the money the nonprofit there are some other factors that go into that. money.ot half the it is very confusing for the groups that want to abide i the law and comply with the law and involve themselves in politics to some degree but don't want to cross a red line and go into a realm that could get them in trouble. about there talking irs and dark money. john is calling from michigan on the line for democrats. caller: good morning.
10:27 pm
i had a couple of comments and the question. this citizens united and campaign funds are now free taxch, you shouldn't get a deduction for using your constitutional right. my question is, is there anyone looking to eliminate texted actions for campaign contributions because they are now free speech? guest: one important point to if you make a campaign contribution you do not get a tax deduction if it is directly
10:28 pm
to a candidate. even if you make a donation to 501 c4 groups, that is not tax-deductible from the donation standpoint. if you're a nonprofit group and i given you $100, i can't do that that off my taxes. is operating as a nonprofit and is tax-free in a certain regard. that is important. do the broader point if these organizations should be able to operate tax-free or in a political way, that is going straight to the height -- heart of what the irs is going to propose in its new rules.
10:29 pm
this is going to be a very public ross s. people a political persuasions are going to have the opportunity to weigh in and an open run up to what is going to be made by the irs. morning, alan. caller: i always enjoy the show. a couple of things. i have a couple of questions. the irs and the election commission are all supposed to be nonpolitical. lois lerner called the in an e-mail that was released. dark money comes in from both sides. majority ofke the
10:30 pm
the targeting was the tea party groups. the words progressive and union were not targeted. unions -- we have to get the unions out of the government. they are led to contribute to campaigns. they are one-sided with their political views. by the union.dled how deep thatw was ingrained. they are not going to go after union groups because they are going after their own supporters . you the irs situation as it is right now, most of the situation is looked at with conservative groups. there have been a number of left leaning or democratic nonprofit
10:31 pm
organizations that have been doing the same thing as many conservative organizations. they are pouring in lots of this so-called dark money into the political system. in terms of a balance right now, there are more conservative dollars flowing into the system. democrats and liberals are andainly aware of the rules the laws as they exist today. toy have made the decision engage in the process the way the rules are written right now. you do have a number of these groups. democrats often talk about the -- dark money being a terrible thing and all money should be transparent. there is money flowing in right now coming from liberal organizations. the irs is aware of this.
10:32 pm
going back to our interview, it was clear that it was going to be a goal of the irs to move beyond strategic targeting of certain organizations by their name and do it in a way that is more equitable. least, they are aware of the issue. that should be very evident to anybody who is watching any of the hearings on capitol hill. according to the center $43responsive politics, million spent by nonprofit groups in the 2014 cycle. let's go to carl waiting in west virginia on the line for republicans. 40 years ago richard
10:33 pm
nixon was forced to resign his office. what do you know about this organization in texas? sheway i understand it, formed an organization to train poll watchers. she applied for this tax exempt. the irs audited her business and her personal account and then the fbi investigated the business because they have tobacco and firearms for a license to manufacture firearms.
10:34 pm
upa came down and wrote them . a congressman said his staff down there to investigate this woman. guts than halfe the people in texas. i will call them what they are. i would like to know what you think about this organization? in, headore dave jumps over to american history tv later today and we will have several hours worth of programming on nixon's resignation. i just went from san antonio last night. topic amongas a hot people i was talking to. i don't know the particulars of the situation.
10:35 pm
this is in general a major issue for anyone who is going to be under the watchful eye of the irs to any degree. this could be onerous to a point that i won't be able to do my job. i won't be able to do my work. my organization is going to have a burden on it that will prevent me from doing what i want to do. often times it is a mixed bag. sometimes you might want to get a group that is getting a strong degree of scrutiny from the irs. that is going to anger a lot of groups. that is going to be a major concern. we hear this a lot. it goes back to that lack of equity that groups feel they are
10:36 pm
getting more scrutiny than other groups. host: marcus in pennsylvania. i am a tax professional. what i am hearing is mostly from republicans is the usual right-wing hysteria. i deal with the irs on a daily basis. i feel them to be professional and courteous. they are overworked and underfunded. these are people who are barely able to do their jobs. darrell issa oversight hearing is nothing more than to whip up the republican base to come out this november. the irs is just doing their job. they are taxed with determining whether or not these applications are valid or not. if mostly conservative groups are applying then guess who is
10:37 pm
going to be under the scrutiny? trying to type e-mails into the white house, they can look at e-mails and there is nothing there. host: to your point on resources for the irs, one of the numbers centere piece from the for public integrity noted that division has 14% fewer staff than it did two decades ago. the sentiments were echoed by many of the irs employees that we talk to for our story. this, theyctively are being bled of resources but most of them are just trying to do their jobs and follow the law that has been written by congress. aty point the finger
10:38 pm
congress as being the villain in all this. it is not the irs. this is the sentiment of the employees and not talking about anybody else. they feel like they have been set up to be the bogeyman when in fact they were just trying to do their due diligence and make sure that the rules and regulations of the country that were set up by a bipartisan congress were followed to achieve. -- if they went off track than that is fair to question. they felt in the interviews that we did that if they don't have the person power to investigate they don't have the resources and the money to do so in a way that is going to be fair and across the board to all organizations than they are going to have to pick and choose the battles they fight and what groups they look into.
10:39 pm
it becomes a situation for them that is untenable. this is not something that is turning around in their favor. caller: it is good that we can voice our opinion. we don't need more money in the irs.
10:40 pm
they are taking money away from the american people. i am 70 years old. . can remember i was a young mother when nixon was going on. the american people had no idea what was going on.
10:41 pm
10:42 pm
10:43 pm
10:44 pm
how does this play out in reality? twood example would be senate races in mississippi. millions of dollars worth of money spent in the race coming from the types of groups we are talking about. where were they from? not from mississippi. virginia, washington, dc. the groups may not have carried -- cared about the innerworkings. caredarried about -- they
10:45 pm
about getting one republican candidate in office over the other. we saw that in the primary in kansas. from there was a challenge milton wolf. many of the outside groups were not based in kansas. they cared about the race from a national perspective but not a local perspective. newsmakersd the program. he talked about his group of $55 millions
10:46 pm
in the 2012 elections. americans of money for prosperity could spend by the end of 2014. here is what he had to say. you have spent tens of millions of dollars so far. can you tell us how much you have spent so far and what you expect to spend throughout the rest of the cycle? >> reports have said we are between 55 and $60 million. that is a larger expenditure. it is significant. we have spent significantly on efforts like this. some people have said unprecedented.
10:47 pm
we have been very active for a number of years. >> some of the biggest criticisms of the group -- you don't disclose the donors. that leads to the dark money. i know you are familiar with that. why not just as close? just disclose? >> we had the most feared regulatory agency in the nation. targeting american citizens. we think it is the best thing to protect the privacy of donors. this of this regime has shown a
10:48 pm
we use the most feared regulatory agency in the nation to go after people. they have shown that. we think it is a prudent thing to do to protect the identities of americans who will become immediate targets. host: where does this fit into the universe of groups? they have gone a different route than certain nonprofits and a lot of the super pac's. the of the advertisements, messages they are putting out, do not directly advocate for or against candidates. often times it will talk about the issues they care about economic issues.
10:49 pm
it may urge people to call up the portable candidate or member of congress. advocatet actually election or defeat. many of them will say, we are not putting all political ads. we are talking out -- putting out ads that talked about issues. opinion whying our should the government come in and say we cannot do that? why should the government come out and say, we have to tell the world who are donors are? that is a question -- criticism we hear. groups that are engaged in that type of the -- type of activity. finance reformgn types that say, these are ads. they are not going up in cities or states.
10:50 pm
politicalmpetitive races. they are applicable ads is an activeas -- debate as to what should happen with those types of political -- they will say that ties go back to the koch brothers. there's a clinical almond to this. that is an open question whether face stricter regulation going forward in the future. nothing at the moment is preventing them from doing exactly what they are doing and it is perfectly legal. >> prime minister left he read let me get to a couple of calls.
10:51 pm
good morning, bob. congressman decides there is enough evidence to go after the irs, do they have to go through the department of justice or do they initiate prosecution without -- >> there are things they can do. ultimately in most cases they would not be a will to send unilateral gel on a kind of basis. that would have a criminal element to it. what they are able to do right now is they have one very powerful power. the subpoena power. they can compel government officials to tell people to we have information filed a freedom of information act quest for much of the same
10:52 pm
or similar types of information. that is something we have not been able to get as easily as the house has been able to get. in some cases have been waiting months. they do have the ability to go above and beyond what the .verage american can do much of the information coming out from the hearings has been because they have enhanced abilities and powers as a -- andsional committee the public's consumption. host: let's go to frank. i was calling because,
10:53 pm
about the irs. i have been audited -- i have i was -- [indiscernible] the irs went after me. social security came out of my check every month. i lost my house. i paid them for everything. between kansas city and austin, texas. talking about his personal situation. anything you want to comment on? don't think you are going to find too many people were the irs would come out on top as a favorite government agency. for whatever personal reason,
10:54 pm
the irs is not going to be a favorite institution by many americans. at the same time, they play a critical role. sense, they are going to have a major role in in part because of what they do also because there thatbeen a lot of agencies high.ome part of the pie. ,he federal election commission democrats and republicans are -- is only a partial
10:55 pm
agreement. in a way, there is a bit of a power vacuum. you have congress in the department of justice. you have the fec. you can argue that the securities and exchange commission can have a part of it as well. there is a power grab, a throwing up of hands from some of these agencies. not addressing camping -- campaign rules and regulations. senior leventhal is a lyrical writer. -- political writer. you can check it out at public integrity.org. thanks for talking with us. >> the latest of elements in iraq and gaza -- latest
10:56 pm
developments in iraq and gaza. government.ect on oversight. discussing the so-called government bills enacted after watergate. everygton journal live at -- live at 7:00 a.m. eastern. >> tim phillips talks about the issues his group is focusing on for 2014. >> you have spent tens of millions of dollars this year. other groups allied with you. can you tell us how much you have spent so far and would you expect to spend through the rest of the cycle? >> published reports have said andre between $55 million $69. million.
10:57 pm
we have an infrastructure on the ground to read -- on the ground. i'm not going to give a firm number. it is significant. i will say this. we have spent on efforts like this for years. it is not a brand-new thing for us. we have been very active for a number of years now. >> you can watch the entire newsmakers interview with tim phillips tomorrow at 10:00 a.m. and 6 p.m. eastern. coming up in a few measurements -- moments, medline albright and condoleezza rice assess the conflict between ukraine and russia. then for bush and michelle obama -- laura bush and michelle obama
10:58 pm
talk about opportunities for women in africa. and the role of so-called dark money in elections. up next, former separate -- secretaries of state. and former defense secretary robert gates. they discuss the implications of the comfort using -- conflict between russia and ukraine. the conversation was hosted by the aspen institute. it is a little less than an hour and a half. [applause] >> bob, thank you very much. i want to thank bob steel and walter isaacson for their leadership at the aspen institute. [applause] as bob said, we are extraordinarily fortunate to
10:59 pm
have two great secretaries of state, madeleine albright and condoleezza rice. the third person will arrive. i spoke to him by phone. his plane was diverted. he had to drive in. i said we would filibuster until he arrived. one way to do that is to say a word about our aspen strategy group. we are a unique institution, i think, in the american foreign-policy because we are nonpartisan. not just bipartisan. we are republicans, democrats, and independents come together once a year. we are in our 30th year. we were founded by two great americans. the general who is not here right now but will be here in a couple of hours and professor joe nye. i would ask you to salute joe. maybe you can stand. [applause]
11:00 pm
we are going to be discussing russia over the next 3.5 days. there is nothing to talk about, u.s.-russian relationships these days but everything to talk about. as we await bob's arrival, we might talk about the issue that united condoleezza rice and madeleine albright. it was a shared interest in russia. it was one individual who brought them both to that shared interest. if you could start and madeleine will finish. >> absolutely. thank you all for joining us here and thank you, nick for this conversation. i want to echo thanks to bob and walter who pull off a extraordinary conversation. in a wonderful and simple way. well, i was, not to put too fine a point on it, but i was a piano major in

52 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on