approval, would be somewhat of an anchor to keep us from continuing to move towards their position. i think would be very typical for you to say that there hasn't been a continual movement towards their position. you look at where we began with the human security resolution. you look at where we began with us potentially agreeing with them to having enough centrifuges to serve their "practical needs," which every scientist has said was about 500 centrifuges. i think you would tell me we have moved way beyond that. congress can be an excellent backstop to you as you are moving down the road. i think senator kaine probably expressed it better than any of us. when we entered into these agreements that senator menendez

was a part of, i don't think anyone in giving you the national security waivers ever thought the president was going to suspend them until the end of his term. will and will and will you and are you will and that will only

in an you will and you you you you and will you i really you and you and you a ruling in 202 and agreement and somehow over time congress changes their mind. we have a presidential race coming up. the iran component will be a major part of the next presidential race. since there is so much concern about the supreme leader and him walking away, i would just say that congress and their approval of a deal would be reassuring that whatever deal that you have done will stand the test of time. i will encourage you to sit down

, walk-through with us some of the concerns you have about timing, but i would say that the general movement today is towards congress playing a role. i think just stiff arming doesn't take us to a place that meets the test that both of us need to meet. i would encourage you to sit down and talk with us. we thank you both, despite our concerns, for your service to our country. let me just give some formalities. the record will remain open until the close of business friday, including for members to submit testimony. we ask witnesses to respond is probably as possible. the responses will be made part of the record. this hearing is now adjourned. thank you. >> thank you, mr. chairman.

>> john boehner announced last week that benjamin netanyahu would be traveling to the united states to address congress about iran's nuclear program and the need for more sanctions. that is scheduled to occur on march 3. the president will not be meeting with prime minister netanyahu during his stay. on meet the press, the white house chief of staff was asked about the visited and what it is for relations with israel. >> here is a senior american official quoted as saying this, there are things you something don't do.

he spat in our face publicly. that is no way to behave. there will be a price. what is the price? >> i don't know you're talking about there. i can't guarantee you that. it is not me. it is not the president. here is what we believe. we at the united states have stayed out of internal politics in the countries of our closest allies. that is true whether we are talking about great britain, we just had a visitor from prime minister cameron, or in israel. that is why we are impartial to the way that we approach it. >> you don't feel that this going to damage the relationship? >> on that going to get hyperbolic. our relationship with israel is multifaceted. it is based on an shared system

of values. >> israeli ambassador to the united states says mr. netanyahu would cancel the trip? >> a committee hearing on the commercial use of drones. witnesses include representatives from nasa and the federal 80 aviation administration. this is one hour. >> the science committee will reconvene and we were now begin our questioning. let me direct my first question to you all. what is a realistic deadline for integrating the drones into the national airspace system? i mentioned in my opening statement that it appears the deadline