>> monday, starting at 11:00 a.m. eastern, c-span numb will provide live coverage of the supreme court confirmation hearing for george neil gorsuch. about tvs were asked coverage of their confirmation hearings. tells me best friend that holds and cameras are nothing to be afraid of. but i do not have a set view on that. i do think it is something i would want to listen to the views, if i were confirmed, to my colleagues. >> issa just then to the chairman that we move quickly to that bill before he has an opinion on it. >> i think it might make me and my colleague behave differently would otherwise keep perhaps they would become accustomed to it after a wild. of our press as part environment.

we cannot really excise it from the environment. but in the courtroom, i think has been thattion we not have that outside distraction. that iclined to say uld not want them in appellate court chambers. >> it would be good for the american public to see what is going on in there. i do not know how long they would be interested in what goes on in appellate argument. not so -- it does not rivet your attention, except perhaps the cases that have amount ofremendous publicity. but i see no reason why the american public should not have access to the court. >> my view on that is i do not see any problem with having proceedings televised. i think it would be good for the public. inat that time, i voted favor, in the judicial conference, of experiencing with

television in the courtroom. that has been carried out. the results of that are being evaluated. in the federal system. particular appeals court was not part of the experiment, but not one of willingness, because they can only have a small number to that of the circumstance in which i think my vote in favor of the experiment was right, as of this moment. >> i had the opportunity to deal with this issue in reaction -- in relation to my own court. all of the courts of appeals were given the authority to arguments to be televised, if they wanted. we had a debate in our court about whetr we should allow television cameras in our courtroom. i argued that we should do it. i thought that it would be a useful -- >> did you strike a position on this issue? >> i did. this is how i ended up in

dissent of my courts. the majority was fearful that our nielsen numbers would the -- >> can you promise the same result? >> i have had positive experiences with cameras. when i have been asked to join experiment using cameras in the courtroom. i have participated and volunteered. but i have said that i think it would be a terrific thing to have cameras in the courtroom. whenhe reason, i think, is you see what happens there, it is an inspiring sight. so i think it would be a great thing for the institution, and more important, a great thing for the american people. circuitecond and ninth courts of appeal continued to permit video coverage of their proceedings. all 50 state supreme court's allow video coverage of their arguments. the canadian and british supreme court's stream their hearings live. the u.s. supreme court permits audio coverage only on a layed

basis. the supreme court confirmation hearings for judge neil gorsuch, live monday starting at 11:00 a.m. eastern on c-span 2, c-span.org, and on the free c-span radio app. >> anyone working at any hedge short-termed in trading, meaning every day, they are trading in and out of stock, all of these people want average. they want edge. there is this right edge that is kind of useless for their purposes, there is the gray zone, and then the black edge, which is inside information. >> tonight on "q&a," sheelah kolhatkar talks about the inside trading case against hedge fund cohenr stephen -- steven ge: insidek "black ed

information, dirty money, and the quest to bring down the most wanted man on wall street." >> the central characters are these two a former portfolio managers for cohen's fund. is currently serving a fairly lengthy prison sentence, though his cases on appeal. mr. steinberg was convicted, but it was later overturned. after an appeals court made a ruling that made it much harder to convict someone for insider adg. >> tonight at 8:00 p.m. eastern on c-span's "q&a." u.s.w, a discussion on immigration policy. this is from friday's biannual summit hosted by the national review institute. it is just over 45 minutes.