think they spent one minute of their 24 hours talking to you about the consequences of that for our country. >> the opening arguments from the president's legal team when the impeachment trial continues in the senate. live coverage monday 1:00 eastern on c-span two, on demand as c-span.org/impeachment and listen on the free c-span radio app. welcome liznt to harrington. elizabeth: thank you for having me. steve: let's begin with thesteve: rnc and its role in the reelection of president trump. what is it? left. we just announced we are adding 300 field staffers to 18 battleground states where we have already had a presence. we are going to be on the ground

working every day to reelect this president and take back the house of representatives. host: the democrats are saying they are not supporting any particular candidate, but there are two republicans running. are you playing a role in their campaigns? guest: now. we fully support the president. ,e has over 90% approval rating the most popular president we have had in our party in modern history. we fully support this president who is an incumbent. we are fully behind him. host: in terms of money, i know the president was in miami last week with fundraisers for the rnc and trump reelection campaign. bottom line, how much money do you think the party and president will spend for his reelection efforts? guest: we have already broken all records. we have 7.5 times the cash on hand. we have broken all records in every month, especially since

september, when the democrats decided to go through with what they always wanted with the impeachment push. we have seen astronomical grassroots fundraising, like we have never seen. half $1ready raised billion last year. i expect that to continue to propel us. no incoming president has ever had this type of battleground gain in states working in conjunction with the trump campaign. it is going to put us in a german disposition. -- tremendous position. host: let's watch this. [video clip] >> mike pence does not drag about sexually assaulting women about sexually assaulting women. mike pence does not pressure for an governments into politically investigating his rivals. mike pence does not make fun of people with handicaps. >> i don't know what i said. >> donald is being impeached.

it is time for president pence. at least it is an improvement. liz harrington, your response to that spot? guest: we know vice president michael pence is fully supportive of the president. i think that ad was ridiculous. there are a lot of lies in that ad. if you want to support and take the talking points of the democrats, you can go ahead and join their ranks. we have such tremendous support from republican voters and americans and even disaffected democrats. what is amazing about this president is the data we are st eightfrom the la rallies since this overreach by the democrats. the average number of registered democrats coming to the president's rally is 24.8%. we have a candidate who is not misrepresenting members of

the republican party but all americans. ofhas a strong message record and accomplishment, the booming economy. think about the record history making things that have happened. we are not even a month into 2020. soleimani, qasem first president to attend the march for life, signed a historic trade deal. we are not even a month into the year yet. we have a history breaking president. that is why we are getting americans of all political persuasions onto our side. it is a winning message. americans are winning under this president. host: we are live wednesday with the president in new jersey. thursday he will be in des moines, iowa. the day before the new hampshire primary key will be in manchester, new hampshire. do you use these rallies as a way to sign up people? do you get a mill addresses? guest: -- host: email addresses?

guest: absolutely. this is a hard-working president. the data i mentioned comes directly from the trump campaign. we want to keep in touch with you. we want you to be engaged. we have people coming off the sidelines. give us your name, your phone number, your email. we keep in touch with you and get you more involved. that is what has been amazing in this. we have identified over 2.4 million voters from these rallies. overat number, it is 300,000 that did not vote for president trump. these are people that are getting engaged, who have been disaffected by politics, just like the labor force. when you look at the last quarter of 2019, 74 percent of new jobs that were created went to people who were outside the labor force, who had stopped -bideng during the obama years and now are getting engaged. the same thing is happening in

the political environment. people are excited about politics and excited that you have a leader standing up for america and delivering for america. we take that data. we want you to stay involved. we are happy that you're coming out and getting involved again. it is a great resource, a great tool to get out there and reelect republicans and reelect the president. host: our lines are open. (202) 748-8000 for democrats, (202) 748-8001 for republicans. we have a line for independents. this technology is relatively new. in terms of being a political operative, how important is social media, email connection to voters? guest: very important. it is a way people get engaged. for decades, there was only one way to get your news. it was through the major networks.

radio came in and now it is online and social media. there are so many different ways to reach voters. you get information out there and sidesteps a biased media that does not have control over communication anymore. a facebook official said the trump campaign in 2016 ran the best social media facebook campaign. it was not micro-targeting, but it was based on using the technology fairly, getting the message out. that is what it is all about, getting our message out, looking at the difference of all of these things that president trump when he was a candidate in 2015 to 2016 said he was going to change in washington. look what he is doing. look at him follow through. this is the third anniversary of his inaugural address. watch that address. it is 17 minutes long. he goes through and says, from this day forward, it is going to be america first on trade, on

foreign affairs, on the economy. he has been consistent. that is why it is amazing. it makes our jobs quite easy. and it winning message is totally consistent. people feel the difference. host: our guest is liz harrington, a maryland native. guest: i grew up on a dairy farm. my dad is a dairy farmer in maryland. i was always interested in politics. i went to school at temple. i studied journalism. my background was in media prior to joining the rnc. i joined the rnc last april. it has been an incredible time to be in politics. i have always loved politics. it is a new era. it is fun. i am proud and privileged to be in the role that i am. host: how is the dairy farm doing? guest: very well. all-time high

approval for president trump. i was there yesterday. i like to get out of the swamp and spend time with family. it is doing great. andad works hard every day it is still running. host: let's go to north carolina, bob, independent line. thank you very much for taking my call. god bless america. i had a comment about the impeachment and the same concerns the lady and/or gentlemn -- and your an. one thing that got me was when mr. schiff came out and talked about the temporary hold on aid, how many ukrainian citizens and troops died that could be attributed to that hold on aid that mr. trump did for political purposes, which is ridiculous. what about when mr. obama and

mr. biden were in there for --ht years and all they gave we had troops from russia with no insignias on invading eastern ukraine and they took a surface to air missile that was russian and shot down a passenger plane and did not let the investigators get to the wreckage for two or three weeks. the only thing mr. obama and mr. biden -- if the democrats are so concerned with ukrainian citizens and troops that were dying because of the russian invasion on the eastern border, why did they just send them wet wipes and blankets? maybe they could sit in the tents and use the sheets to put a white flag out and throw cartons and cans at russian troops. that is hypocrisy. host: thank you. guest: bob raised some amazing points. it is true. where were the democrats? are in an we

alternate reality where we never left the obama-biden years, when the ukrainians were still waiting for the javelin missiles. obama and biden never armed ukraine. president trump has done it three times. this goes to the heart of the democrats' case, which is they do not have one. all they can do is smear and come up with another conspiracy theory of military aid and investigations when the fact is the fundamental problem with the democrats' case is they are accusing president trump of what we know democrats did in 2016. you are talking about election interference and we hear this all the time, this falsely caught me where the democrats are now saying it was russia. it can't be ukraine. they say, fine, we will admit the dnc was working with ukrainian officials to "sabotage -- in 2016."

what has more of an impact? was it hacking that did not change a single vote in 2016 or was it a dossier based on disinformation paid for by the hillary clinton campaign and dnc that used sources supposedly in russia, sources supposedly in ukraine? what had a bigger impact on our internal politics? a discredited dossier that was used to spy on the trump campaign and used to start hysterical, two year investigation that found nothing. it is shameful that adam schiff still stands out there with no credibility, continuing to push the debunked conspiracy theory n collusion that we paid dearly for in over $32 million to discredit.

what had a bigger impact on america and our internal politics? i think that election meddling had much more impact. host: we welcome our listeners on c-span radio. our guest is liz harrington of the republican national committee. for those of you watching in great britain, on the bbc parliament channel. our guest also featured in a podcast available on the daily caller website. this is what it looks like. let's go to lily on the democrats line from st. louis. the first thing he did was line. -- lie. reported some of it, not all of it. all we asked for -- if the democrats lied, show us reports. let the witnesses come out let them explain to us.

can see the reports and hear the witness and see the reports. let us have the report and witness. now we will know who is lying. we want a president not tweet all night. people, not tweet and keep everybody up. everybody hates each other. he never bring nobody together. all he did was bring hate and lie every day. every day he lies about everything. a rich man is up there and destroying everybody. all these beggars on the border are dying. he don't care nothing about nobody. trump did nothing but destroy this country. four more years -- we not going to have no more country. guest: democrats should take it

to the ballot box. it has been clear what this has been about. adam schiff practically admitted it on the senate floor. he said we cannot decide this at the ballot box. we cannot be sure it is going to be fair. democrats lost an election in 2016. they do not accept it. they did not admit they did not see it coming. they did not admit that millions of americans have been left behind i corrupt politicians. president trump had a winning message. democrats never accepted that victory and now they are saying, when we lose an election, we will accuse you of stealing it. when we are worried we are going to lose again, we are going to accuse you of stealing it. incoherent.erly the is the crucial part of matter. they are too scared to go to the voters and let the voters decide who their president is going to be in less than 10 months.

why can't they do that? why are they saying we have to not only overturn the last election but interfere in the next election by taking an incumbent president who has ushered in the greatest economy in modern history? we will take a multi-ballot for something that we cannot even allege a crime occurred. it is the weakest, most pathetic impeachment articles we have ever seen. democrats have defined impeachment down to nothing more than a petty political tool that is going to be meaningless in the future. it will show. it will be history making because it will show democrats overreached. nancy pelosi will be the first woman speaker to lose the gavel not just once but twice. host: how often do you follow the president's tweets? guest: i have alerts on my phone. host: he has 300 over the last five days. hoaxeeted, the impeachment is a massive election interference the likes of which has never been seen before.

in just two hours, the radical left and do nothing democrats have seen their phony case shredded. is exposed for illegally making up my phone call and more. let's get to your phone calls. bill on the republican line. morning.ood it is great to see someone like from temple university. you are an excellent spokesperson. i would say this -- when president trump came down the escalator, i had opinions of him. they were not that great. i remember him from the 1990's. he was kind of a playboy. his message that he came out with was a winning message. that heately identified was going to be the one that got the nomination. he got the nomination and he accomplishes greatest task.

he won the election. he prevented hillary clinton from taking the presidency. i do not have to remind viewers hillary clinton's husband was impeached. a series ofched for nasty acts. it is a disgrace. what they are trying to impeach trump on right now is such a small model. -- greating at it things on trade. overall, he is given us an economy. great court us appointments.

he has given us so much good say thisat we have to is a guy that we are happy with. host: thank you for the call. guest: absolutely. the record speaks for itself. this is a man of his word. just to go back to friday, becoming the first president to speak at the march for life, i went back and watched the debate portion between president trump and hillary clinton on that topic. he has been proven so correct on that. he said democrats, with what you're saying and where you're going on this issue, you're talking about ripping the baby out of the womb at the ninth month. here we are three years later. president trump is in the white house, the most pro-life president in history. where are the democrats on this issue? not a single candidate running for president was willing to admit a single limit on abortion. pete buttigieg justifies abortion up until the moment of the baby's breath.

every candidates, including joe biden, who changed his position after decades, they all now support taxpayer-funded abortions. when you look at the statements over the years, you can see president trump has been so consistent and follow through and he is a man of his word. look at the results. democrats emma they have nothing to run on except -- democrats, they have nothing to run on except for left extreme policies. strategistublican for msnbc and the cofounder and ceo of all in together wrote a piece. the headline is, time for the gop to make a serious commitment to electing women. today, there are 23 republican women in congress, the lowest number in decades. in 2018, a record number of democratic women were elected to the house and senate while republican women face near decimation of the ranks. only 13 republican women remain in the house.

four of the nine republican women senators were reported rather than elected. party leaders must acknowledge what the 2018 and 2019 elections , as well as what count was pulls of indicated. suburban women, especially those with college degrees, have been fleeing the republican party in droves, turned off by trump. guest: we totally agree that getting women involved is very important. we have a winning message for women. i think you have seen the efforts. representative's to phonic -- representative's to phonic -- is message-- we know our works for women. we know women are fighters. they a lot of times do the payroll for their families. they are the ones writing the checks. they want strong communities.

our message is very strong for women. inare very confident expanding those numbers and getting more female support. we absolutely have tremendous support already. host: our guest is liz harrington, the national spokesperson for the republican national committee. democrats line. good morning. caller: good morning. just to make a comment about that last statement you just made, that is ridiculous. i wanted to start off by starting with some recent historical facts about the elections, the presidential elections, and then i want to ask you a question. in 2004, the republicans came up with a term where they used a conspiratorial conspiracy against john kerry about

vietnam. to2008, they again tried swindle barack obama. caught inhey got bidenattempt to -- joe with ukraine. should trump be allowed to stay on the ballot when he was caught in his conspiracy? if it was not a conspiracy, then let the witnesses come out and prove it was not a conspiratorial -- it was not conspiratorial. host: thank you. guest: the house democrats ran with adam schiff for their impeachment. they said it was the most overwhelming case we've ever seen. they decided not to subpoena witnesses. they decided to withdraw subpoenas for witnesses. they claim they did not want the facts. they obviously were not interested in facts or evidence.

they had one agenda, which was to get this done by christmas. why should the senate do the house's job? they are now accusing the senate of a cover-up. hear whatver-up to the democrats in the house brought forth. that is all we are doing is hearing the case the claim was so ironclad, which obviously it is not. host: another tweet from the president, shifty adam schiff is a sick man. he has not paid the price yet for what he has done to our country. i wanted to ask about the tone of the tweet. shifty shift -- he uses that term. why get so personal? guest: i wish jerry nadler would not call president trump a dictator or you look at the rhetoric on the it is this idea that only president trump is upping the rhetoric. it is not true. the democrats have been calling him a dictator. bernie sanders has been using that extreme rhetoric for over a

year. president trump is going to fight back. he is absolutely right. this is a corrupt politician who has zero credibility, adam schiff. he lied for over two years. he is still lying about evidence and collusion. he is acting as if it exists and smearing the president for cheating in his first -- he could not get 10 minutes into his argument without falsely smearing the president of cheating. it is not just about president trump. 63 millionent means americans that voted for him -- your vote does not matter if you are that is what democrats are saying to you. they are saying your vote -- we do not accept your vote. he had to cheat to get your vote and we know that is not true. the smears that have been coming out of adam schiff, he lied about collusion. we know are now illegal.

he lied about that, smeared devin nunes. phoneeased devin nunes's records. his abuse of power on that committee, bringing us to this moment, was all concocted by adam schiff lying about a whistleblower that he said he had never -- his committee had never spoken to. host: at somebody in politics, do you worry that the tone on both sides, the white house and from congress, is becoming toxic and turning off the american people? guest: i think we have had a talk cyclical going back centuries, quite frankly. political environment going back centuries, quite frankly. like to come -- tone down rhetoric. we wish we could have respectful debate. the democrats are trying to getting alection by president of the ballots come

overturned 63 million american'' votes off of nothing come off of no crime, nothing proven come off of something that every democrat witness was allowed to mom -- burisma was corrupt. when you are taking extraordinary levels, you are upping your rhetoric. you are taking the extraordinary level of trying to overturn an election and debasing the constitution in the process. i think you can expect some strong emotion and strong words because this is fundamentally unjust. wilmington go to illinois, democrats line. good morning. good morning and thank you for taking my call.

the senate cannot remove a man as corrupt as donald trump from checks and balances is nothing more than myth. host: let me ask you what we can expect tomorrow from the president's lawyers. guest: absolutely. they already have done an incredible job of dismantling key facts, pushing back. i was the first responsibility, to say the democrats, who had complete control over a taxpayer-funded investigation, they did not tell you a lot of things. we are going to see tomorrow, alan dershowitz and other members of the president's team, talking about the constitutionality. on the constitution, this impeachment has no merit. it is a phony charge, obstruction of congress. with the democrats are saying is , we will decide -- talk about checks and balances.

we will decide to have separation of powers dispute. we will not even pursue it in the courts that we will say we will impeach you for something that we did not do, which is go to court and litigate this and driver courts be the on this let them decide -- the juror on this. let them decide. we will see the constitutionality argument on every level. we can win on the facts come on the evidence come on the constitution -- on the facts, on the evidence, on the constitution. the president's team has done a good job of dismantling the democrats' case. host: kevin, thank you for waiting. caller: good morning. i have followed this since trump's election. recently, i have seen the

kindergarten, playground behavior stemming from the democratic party. they have not -- i would not even say just the democratic party. until recently, trump did not even have support from his own party. trial, the senate house trial and senate trial, the thing is, i hear elizabeth saying they did not do this so why should we do that? why should we do their job for them? you are not doing their job for them. you are doing your job for us. witnesses, anybody that has any truth to what should come forth without a subpoena. host: thank you. guest: we do not have an issue with witnesses. i think democrats will have an issue with witnesses. host: so you are of john bolton

testifies? guest: let me finish my point. democrats are under the illusion that it is going to be run like the scam it was in the house, where they could to decide and have complete -- get to decide and have complete control over the witness list with no republican input. that is not going to happen. the main argument is this is the case that the democrats brought. it is such a farce. it is a disgrace. it is an insult to the prostitution. the president deserves -- to the constitution. we have work to do for the american people. the idea that we are -- president trump has said it a million times. mick mulvaney, he would love for him to testify. host: there have been reports that he would use executive privilege and democrats are arguing if you are telling the truth, why are you afraid witnesses coming to the senate floor? guest: why are the democrats afraid of hunter biden coming, joe budden coming, the whistleblower coming who started this? i thinkthe game that

the democrats do not want to play. they do not want to hear from what we already know. we cannot learn anything new about the president's actions. we have the transcript. we have the facts. we know exactly why the aid was pause. it was to get european allies to do more on corruption. democrats can try to distort all they want, but the only new whatmation we can learn is exactly was hunter biden being paid for? what exactly did adam schiff's committee and the whistleblower say? who on his committee core donated? how did he -- coordinated? how did he end up with an attorney who has been calling for a coup against president trump? how did this whistleblower urgentnt and up being an

-- end up being a urgent concern and read like a legal document? totally designed to trigger an impeachment. there is a lot we can learn. we cannot learn more about why the aid was pause. we know the answer to that question. host: if you had to bet, knowing with the senate will do, do you think there will be witnesses? guest: i do not think there will be. i do not think the democrats wants to go there. i do not think they want to get answers on the bidens' corruption. host: you think this will wrap up this week potentially? guest: potentially. we will see how much longer the white house counsel and president's attorneys think they need to lay out their case. they clearly do not need to repeat themselves like the democrats did. we will have a period of days and attorneys' questions. we will see what the senate decides. we are looking forward to a complete acquittal, a fair acquittal.

that is what is most important. the videoow you saw yesterday from abc news, lev parnas from april 2018. is basically walking around telling everybody he is going to get impeached. just wait. it is incredible. >> get her out tomorrow. get her out tomorrow. take her out, ok? do it. this response from the white house on friday, courtesy of "the new yorker." the white house did not deny that the president attended the dinner on april 30 of 2018. from the white house press secretary, every president in our history has had the right to place people who support his agenda and policies within the administration. the new yorker pointing out no one suggested that trump did not have the authority to replace master jovanovich -- ambassador

yovanovitch. the issue is why he did it and why he has been lying about his relationship with lev parnas. guest: how many dinners and photos -- host: there are multiple photos them at least eight or nine. -- photos, at least eight or nine. guest: the big take away from this is this is no new information. president trump has made it clear that he wanted to remove ambassador who serves at the pleasure of the president, who was supposed to be in place to foreignhe president's policy agenda. he had every right. the new york times acknowledges halfway down that there is nothing new here. also, it fundamentally hurts the democrats' case. when was this clip from? host: april 2018. guest: was joe biden running for president then?

was this idea that there was election interference -- i guess if you take the democrats' standard, one of their star witnesses, he was retroactively meddling in the 2020 election by going to vice president biden's office in 2015 and saying red flag them at your sun is on the most corrupt natural gas company in ukraine. this is nothing new. thatinforces the point, unelected bureaucrats from the beginning have been part of the resistance and have been trying to undermine president trump's agenda. he has every right to have people in place that are going to pursue his america first agenda. attorney wasnas's on cnn yesterday let me share with you what he said. [video clip] >> do you know the reason why he made the recordings? >> i do not know.

some people make recordings. they like to take pictures. i cannot ascribe any motive beyond that. are there more recordings that lev parnas has with the president? >> yes. >> do you plan to release those? >> perhaps. we have sent recordings -- recordings to the house intelligence committee. this seems to address the issue of the ambassador and we thought it was important to get that in public. >> what is the significance of these recordings? you aspects are important. first, we hear the president himself saying get rid of the ambassador, fire her, get her out of there. this is one of the first occasions in which he attempts to remove the ambassador. that heas was shocked wanted to raise the subject of the ambassador and have the

chief executive say get rid of her and fire her. he could never have expected that the president would take that step. host: that courtesy of cnn. action? guest: it is curious why this individual was secretly recording the president in the first place. again, this adds nothing new. the president has been open about his position about this abbasid are, who he -- ambassador, who he believed did not have the interest of the country, and pursuing interests that were contrary to our interests. there is a lot of corruption in ukraine. people reason why we are even because there is is corruption in ukraine. we wanted to determine if they elected a new president, let's make sure our taxpayer dollars are going to be well spent. discuss that you can't

things that happened in ukraine , nobody forced joe biden to run point on ukraine and two months later have his sun end up on the board of the most corrupt company, making $83,000 a month with zero experience. if we had individuals working on ukraine policy that were looking the other way on instances of corruption like that or other things, absolutely he had the right to remove her and he has been open about that. host: let's go to north carolina, jeffrey, democrats line. caller: good morning. you're missing the point. the point is the president lied about knowing mr. parnas. if you can say he does not know him when he is discussing , -- the reason he was

talking to him as far back as last year was that the crowd strike. he was trying to get ukraine to oneshat ukraine were the assisting in the election and not the russians. that is what crowd strike was about. tot was his first effort involve ukrainians in our election, our coming election. you -- we arehow not going to address mr. trump is trying to cheat in the next election. what about obama? he did not give them a pair that is what you said, but you forgot to mention -- aid, but you forgot to mention that mr. obama knew that the previous administration was corrupt. that is why they did not get aid. host: response? guest: that is not the reason

why obama did not give the aid. he thought it would get us into further conflict with russia and he did not want to jeopardize the relationship with russia because he is russia's close ally. it was in service of the nuclear deal. he did not enforce the redline in syria because of the same issues. it is preposterous, the idea that democrats can smear the president and tried to put blood on his hands of ukrainians when this president is the only president who armed ukraine and gave them tank busting missiles and have their back. democratsrence of the message and argument on this is so illogical. it is so hypocritical to see asm standing there, acting if they want to go to war with russia all of a sudden when they never -- many of them did not support arming ukraine in the first place. it is very hip critical. host: from your standpoint, was

ukraine involved in the toy 16 election? guest: read politico. read the great story on january 2017. he was working on this issue as recently as may 1. now he works for the new york times. why is he not pursuing this story anymore? he was going to report that ukrain -- ukrainian officials went to the white house to thatss the bidens and conflict in january 2016. he never reported the story. why didn't he report that? who wasa contractor working with people from the ukrainian embassy, a former member of parliament in ukraine was an individual who was working to sabotage president trump.

there is a long record of this. the idea that because russia did ukraine -- that because russia did, ukraine didn't is absurd. they are not exclusive. your reactionet to what the fbi director told abc news. [video clip] >> the government -- to the government of ukraine interfere on the skill the russians did? >> we have no evidence that ukraine interfered with the 2016 presidential election. when you see politicians pushing that notion come are you concerned about its impact on the american public? >> there are all kinds of people saying all kinds of things out there. it is important for the american people to be thoughtful consumers of information and to think about the sources of it and to think about the support and predication for what they hear. heard from the president himself that he wanted the crowd strike portion of this

whole conspiracy in ukraine investigated. i am hearing you say there is no evidence to support that as far as you know. >> as i said, we have no -- we are the fbi have no information that would indicate that ukraine tried to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. host: that is the fbi director. we should point out the president disagreeing with his own fbi director. eight ukrainian court has ruled that they did interfere in our election by someone leaking a black ledger, which to this day people have questions about the veracity of. campaign trump's manager fired from the campaign. that effected -- affected the election. if we are talking about scale, again, homeland security, the senate intelligence committee, robert mueller failed to mention it but he could not find it come

evidence that a single that was changed does not exist. not a single that was changed. they have always tried when you're talking about scale and impact of election meddling, look no further than what hillary clinton. you want collusion? take her made up for in dirt. it was a bunch of lies and up dirt, using that to spy on his campaign and spy on his transition and try to sabotage and remove a totally elected president. putting this in context, talk about scale. the day of the phone call is the day after robert mueller testified and finally that collusion line went up in smoke. what did president trump say the day later? i would like you to do us a ourr, though, because country has been through a lot.

you bet we have been through a lot. the democrat party lost an election. they decided to try to smear the victor in that election, who defied all odds, defied history, and became the first person who had never held elected office to become the president of the united states. we are going to have this insane investigation and spend countless hours on cable television whipping up hysteria about russia. it was all a lie. weukraine knows about it, have every right to know about this. this is something democrats in the media used to pretend to care about. host: liz harrington, we will conclude on that note. we hope you will come back again. spokesperson for campaign 2020

coverage differs from all other coverage for one reason, it is c-span, the people who brought you unfiltered government since 1979 are bringing you an updated view of the people seeking to steer the government this november. your future. see the biggest picture for yourself and make up your own mind. you as aign 2020, but public service by your cable television provider. we want to welcome jessica post, president of the democratic legislative campaign committee, which is what? jessica: we are the official democratic party organization committed to building power in state legislatures. our job is to flip state legislatures from red to blue across the country and increase democratic representation in the states. i want to put on thp of changing representation in congress. it shows the population ship we have across the country.