as the member designated by mr. doggett, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. doggett will vote yes on ordering the previous question. as the member designated by mr. moulton, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. moulton will vote yes on ordering the previous question. as the member designated by mr. lieu, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lieu will vote yes on ordering the previous question. as the member designated by mr. lowenthal, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lowenthal will vote yes on ordering the previous question. as the member designated by ms. barragan, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. barragan will vote yes on ordering the previous question. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina rise? mr. butterfield: as the member designated by mr. price of north carolina, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. price will vote yes, he will vote yes on ordering the previous question. as the member designated by mr.

bishop of georgia, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. bishop will vote yes, he will vote yes on ordering the previous question. as the member designated by mr. carson of indiana, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. carson will vote yes, he will vote yes on ordering the previous question.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan rise? mr. kildee: madam speaker, as the member designated by mrs. lawrence of michigan, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. lawrence will vote yes on ordering the previous question. as the member designated by mr. higgins of new york, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. higgins will vote yes on the previous question.

the speaker pro tempore: for

what purpose does the gentleman from california rise? mr. correa: madam speaker, as the member designated by congress member napolitano, pursuant to house resolution 8, as the member designated by congress member napolitano will vote aye on ordering the previous question. and madam speaker, as the member designated by congress member roybal-allard, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress member roybal-allard will vote yes on ordering the previous question.

the speaker pro tempore: masks should be worn on the floor. appropriately with nose and mouth covered. thank you. for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania rise? mr. kelly: as the member designated by amodei, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. amodei will vote no on the rule for s. con5.

-- s.con. 5.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania rise? for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania rise? mr. evans: madam speaker, as the

member designated by mr. lawson of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yes on the motion of ordering the previous question on the rule. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from pennsylvania rise? for what purpose does the gentlewoman from pennsylvania rise? ms. scanlon: as the member designated by ms. speier, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. speier will vote yes on ordering the previous question.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas rise? mr. arrington: as the member designated by mr. buchanan, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. buchanan will vote no on the previous question. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from -- for what purpose does the gentleman from arizona rise?

mr. stanton: as the member designated by mr. kirkpatrick, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that -- mrs. kirkpatrick, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. kirkpatrick will vote yes on ordering the previous question. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana rise? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mchenry, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mchenry will vote no on the previous question.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california rise? mr. gomez: as the member designated by mr. vicente gonzalez, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. gonzalez will vote yes on the previous question. as the member designated by mr. cardenas, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. cardenas will vote aye on ordering the previous question. as the member designated by mr. gallego, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. gallego will vote aye on ordering the previous question. and as the member designated by mr. vela, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. vela will vote aye on ordering the previous question.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia rise? ms. wexton: thank you, madam speaker. as the member designated by by mr. mceachin, pursuant to section 8, and mecked ms. porter, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house ms. porter will vote yes on ordering the previous question.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the the gentlewoman from missouri rise? mrs. hartzler: madam speaker, as the member designated by by mr. long of missouri, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house mr. long will vote nay on the previous question to h.res. 101. as the member designated by by mr. gosar of arizona, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house mr. gosar will vote nay on the previous question to h.res. 101.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from michigan rise? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by by mrs. axne, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. axne will vote yes on ordering the previous question.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida rise? >> thank you, madam speaker. as the member designated by by mr. waltz of the great state of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. waltz will vote nay on ordering the previous questioned. as the member designated by by mr. donald of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. donald will vote nay on ordering the previous question.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey rise? >> madam chair -- madam speaker , as the member designated by by mrs. bonnie watson coleman, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs.

bonnie watson coleman will vote yes on ordering the previous question. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida rise? mrs. demings: as the member designated by ms. castor, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. castor will vote yes on ordering the previous question.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida rise?

ms. wasserman schultz: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. payne of new jersey, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. payne will vote yea on ordering the previous question. as the member designated by by mr. hastings of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. hastings will also vote yea on ordering the previous question.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts rise? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. chuy garcia of illinois, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. garcia will be voting yes on the previous question.

the speaker pro tempore: have all members voted?

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 220. and the nays are 210. the question is on the adoption of the resolution. those in favor say aye -- the previous question is ordered. the question is on the adoption of the resolution. those in favor say aye. those opposed, no. in the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it. mr. burgess: i'll have to ask

for the yeas and nays. i think you miscalculated. the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to section 3-f. of house resolution -- 3-f of house resolution 8, the yeas and nays are ordered. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house o reestative] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from arizona rise? mr. stanton: as the member designated by mrs. kirkpatrick, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. kirkpatrick will vote yes on h.res. 101.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia rise? mr. beyer: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. moulton, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mouton will vote yes on h.res. 101. as the member designated by mr. kind, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. kind will vote yes on h.res. 101. as the member designated by mr. cohen, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. cohen will vote yes on h.res. 101. as the member designated by mr. doggett, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. doggett will vote yes on h.res. 101. as the member designated by mr. blumenauer, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. blumenauer will vote yes on

h.res. 101. as the member designated by mr. lieu, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. lieu will vote yes on h.res. 101. as the member designated by mr. lowenthal, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. lowenthal will vote yes on h.res. 101. as the member designated by ms. barragan, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. barragan will vote yes on h.res. 101. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas rise? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. fallon from the great state of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. fallon will vote no on house resolution 101.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from pennsylvania rise? ms. scanlon: as the member designated by ms. speier, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. speier will vote yes on h.res. 101.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts rise? ms. pressley: as the member

designated by mr. chuy garcia, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. garcia will be voting yes on h.res. 101. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california rise? mr. gomez: as the member designated by mr. vicente gonzalez, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. gonzalez will vote aye on h.res. 101. as the member designated by mr. vela, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. vela will vote aye on h.res. 101. as the member designated by mr. cardenas, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. cardenas will vote aye on h.res. 101. as the member designated by mr. gallego, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. gallego will vote aye on h.res. 101.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida rise? mrs. demings: as the member designated by ms. castor, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. castor will vote yes on house resolution 101. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york rise? mr. jeffries: as the member designated by chairwoman zoe zoe lofgren, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that chairwoman

lofgren will vote yea on h.res. 101. as the member designated by chairwoman maloney, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that chairwoman maloney will vote yea on h.res. 101. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania rise? >> as the member designated by by mr. amodei of nevada, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. amodei will vote nay on h.res. 101.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from missouri rise? wagner: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. long of missouri, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house mr. long will vote no on h.res. 101. as the member designated by by mr. gosar of arizona, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. gosar will vote no on h.res. 101.

the speaker pro tempore: for

what purpose does the gentleman from hawaii rise? mr. case: thank you, madam speaker. as the member designated by mr. kehele of hawaii, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. kehele: will vote yes on agreeing to the resolution. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina rise? mr. butterfield: as the member designated by mr. price of north carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. price will vote yes, he will vote yes on h.res. 101. as the member designated by by mr. bishop of georgia, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. bishop will vote yes, he will vote yes on h.res. 101. as the member designated by by mr. carson of indiana, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. carson will vote yes, will vote yes on

h.res. 101. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from north carolina rise? ms. adams: as the member designated by ms. wilson of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. wilson enclose vote yes on h.res. 101. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania rise? mr. evans: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. lawson of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yes on h.r. resolution

101. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from connecticut rise? mr. courtney: thank you, madam speaker. madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. john larson, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. larson will vote yes on h.res. 101. as the member designated by mr. langevin of rhode island, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. langevin will vote yes on h.res. 101.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois rise? >> as the member designated by by mr. rush, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. rush will vote yes on h.res. 101. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from missouri rise? mrs. wagner: madam speaker, as the member designated by by mr. mccaul of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. mccaul will vote no on h.res. 101.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the the gentlewoman from massachusetts rise? ms. clark: madam speaker, as the member designated by by mr. bowman, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. bowman will vote yes on h.res. 101. as the member designated by by mr. cooper, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. cooper will vote yes on h.res. 101. as the member designated by ms. frankel, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. frankel will vote yes on h.res. 101. as the member designated by ms.

jayapal, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. jayapal will vote yes on h.res. 101. as the member designated by mr. lynch, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lynch will vote yes on h.res. 101. as the member designated by by ms. meng, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. meng will vote yes on h.res. 101. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia rise? ms. wexton: thank you, madam speaker. as the member designated by mr. mceachin, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. mceachin will vote yes on h.res. 101.

as the member designated by ms. porter, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. porter will vote yes on h.res. 101. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california rise? mr. correa: madam speaker, as the member designated by congress women napolitano, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress member napolitano will vote yes on h.res. 101. madam speaker, as the member designated by congress member roybal-allard, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress member

roybal-allard will vote yes on house resolution 101. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan rise? mr. kildee: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. panetta of california, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. panetta will vote yes on h.res. 101. as the member designated by mr. higgins of new york, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. higgins will vote yes on h.res. 101. as the member designated by mrs. lawrence of michigan,

pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. lawrence will vote yes on h.res. 101. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana rise? >> as the member designated by mr. mchenry of north carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. mchenry will vote no on h.res. 10 1. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. ruiz, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. ruiz will vote yes on h.res. 101.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia rise?

>> mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. titus of nevada, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. titus will vote yes on h.res. 101.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from michigan rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. axne, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. axne will vote yes on h.res. 101. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from california rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. desaulnier, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. desaulnier will vote yes on

h.res. 101.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas rise? >> as the member designated by mr. buchanan of the great state of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lieu buchanan will be a no on the adoption of h.res. 101. i yield back.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida rise? >> thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by mr. donls of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. donls will vote nay on h.res. 101. as the member designated by mr. waltz of the state of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. waltz will vote nay on h.res. 101. the speaker pro tempore: for

what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. bonnie watson coleman, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. watson coleman will vote yes on h.res. 101. the speaker pro tempore: for

what purpose does the gentleman from massachusetts rise? >> as the member designated by mrs. trahan of massachusetts, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. trahan will vote yes on h.res. 101.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida rise? ms. wasserman schultz: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. payne of new

jersey, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. payne will vote yea on h.res. 101. as the member designated by mr. hastings of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. hastings will also vote yea on h.res. 101. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland rise? mr. brown: mr. speaker, as the member designated by miss krishnamoorthi of illinois, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. krishnamoorthi will vote yes on h.res. 101.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 219. the nays are 209. the resolution is adopted. without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid upon the table. the chair announces that pursuant to house resolution 101, senate concurrent resolution 5 is hereby adopted. pursuant to clause 1-c of rule

19, further consideration of h.r. 447 will now resume. the clerk will report the title. the clerk: h.r. 447, a bill to amend the acts of august 16, 1937, commonly referred to as the national apprenticeship act, and extend the national apprenticeship system to include 3ri7, youth apprenticeship, and preapprenticeship of such act to promote labor standards necessary for the welfare of apprenticeships and for other purposes. the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the question on amendments en bloc 1 printed in report 117-3, offered by the gentleman from michigan. the clerk will designate the amendment en bloc. the clerk: enclock number one consisting of amendments numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, and 13 printed in part b of house report number 117-3, offered by mr. levin of

michigan. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendments offered en bloc by the gentleman from michigan. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman

from virginia rise? mr. beyer: as the member designated by mr. moulton, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. moulton will vote yes on the amendments en bloc one. as the member designated by mr. kind, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. kind will vote yes on the amendments en bloc one. as the member designated by mr. cohen, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. cohen will vote yes on amendments en bloc one. as the member designated by mr. doeringet, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. doggett will vote yes on the amendments on en bloc 1. as the member designated by ms. barragan, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. barragan will vote yes on the amendments of block one. as the member designated by by mr. kwlone tall, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lowenthal will vote yes on the amendments en bloc 1. as the member designated by by mr. lieu, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lieu will vote yes on the amendments of block 1. as the member designated by mr. blumenauer, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. blumenauer will vote yes on the amendments en

bloc number 1. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. donald of the state of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. donalds will vote nay on the en bloc amendment. as the member designated by by mr. waltz, state of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. waltz will vote nay on the en bloc amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york rise? mr. jefferies: as the member designated by chairwoman zo lofgren, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that chairwoman lofgren will vote yea on amendments en bloc 1. as the member designated by chairwoman carolyn maloney, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that chairwoman maloney will vote yea on amendments en bloc 1.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from florida seek recognition 1234 ms. wasserman schultz: as the member designated by mr. payne of new jersey, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. payne will vote yea on the amendments en bloc number 1. mr. speaker as the member designated by mr. lavings of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. hastings will also vote yea on the amendments

en bloc number 1. froip for what purpose d -- the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. panetta of california, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. panetta will vote yes on en bloc amendments number one. as the member designated by mr. higgins of new york, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. higgins will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 2 one. as the member designated by mrs. lawrence of michigan, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. lawrence will vote yes on the amendments en bloc one.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from kale seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. gallego, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. gallego will vote aye on amendments en bloc one. as the member designated by mr. cardenas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. cardenas will vote aye on the amendments en bloc one. as the member designated by mr.

vi ten -- vicente fwons les, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. vicente gonzalez will vote aye on amendments en bloc one. as the member designated by mr. vela, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. vela will vote aye on amendments en bloc one.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from missouri seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. mccaul of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. mccaul will vote yes on levin amendment en bloc number one to h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. long of missouri, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. long will vote nay on levin amendment en bloc one to h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. gosar of arizona, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. gosar will vote nay on levin amendment en bloc one to h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from massachusetts rise? >> as the member designated by mrs. trahan of massachusetts, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. trahan will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number one.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from north carolina rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. wilson, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. wilson will vote yes on amendments en bloc one. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from texas rise? -- the gentleman from texas rise? >> as the member designated by mr. buchanan of the great state of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. buchanan will be a no vote on the en bloc amendment

number one offered by mr. levin of michigan. i yield back.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from connecticut rise? >> thank you, mr. speaker. mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. john larson of connecticut, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. larson will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number one. as the member designated by mr. langevin, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. langevin will vote yes on the amendments en bloc one.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. fallon of the great state of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. fallon will vote no on the en bloc amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. lawson of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lawsen will vote yea on the amendment en bloc one.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by congress member napolitano, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress member napolitano will vote yes on the amendment en bloc one. mr. correa: as the member designated by congress member roybal-allard, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress member roybal-allard will vote yes on amendments en bloc one.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. bowman, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. bowman will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number one. as the member designated by mr. cooper, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. cooper will vote yes on amendments en bloc one. as the member designated by ms. frankel, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. frankel will vote yes on amendments en bloc one. as the member designated by ms. jayapal, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. jayapal will vote yes on the amendments en bloc one. as the member designated by mr. lynch, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lynch will vote yes on amendments en bloc number one. as the member designated by ms.

meng, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. meng will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number one.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from arizona rise? >> as the member designated by mrs. kirkpatrick, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. kirkpatrick will vote yes on the amendments en bloc one.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida rise? >> as the member designated by ms. castor, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. castor will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number one.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from michigan rise? ms. stevens: as the member designated by mrs. axne, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. axne will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 1.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by by mr. mchenry of north carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. mchenry will vote nay on the en bloc amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina rise? >> as the member designated by mr. price of north carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. price will vote yes, he will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 1. mr. butterfield: as the member designated by mr. bishop of georgia, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. bishop will vote yes, he will vote yes on the

amendments en bloc number 1. finally, mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. carson of indiana, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. carson will vote yes, he will vote yes on the amendments enblock number 1. -- en bloc number 1.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the the gentlewoman from california rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. desaulnier, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. desaulnier will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 1.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. amday of nevada, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. amodei will vote yes on

en bloc number one.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia rise? mr. connolly: as the member designated by ms. titus of nevada, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. titus will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number one.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. krishnamoorthi of illinois, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. krishnamoorthi will

vote yes on the amendments en bloc one. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from pennsylvania rise? >> as the member designated by ms. speier, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. speier will vote yes on the amendments en bloc one.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from hawaii seek recognition? >> thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by kehele of hawaii, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. kehele will vote aye on en bloc number one offered by mr. levin.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does -- frourp does the gentlewoman from virginia rise? >> thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by mr. mceachin, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. mceachin will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number one. as the member designated by ms. porter, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. porter will vote yes on amendments en bloc number one. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois rise? >> as the member designated by mr. rush, pursuant to house

resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. rush will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number one. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from -- the gentleman from new jersey rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. bonnie watson coleman, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. watson coleman will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number one.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. ruiz, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. ruiz will vote yes on amendment en bloc number one.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts rise? >> as the member designated by mr. garcia, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. garcia will be voting yea and agreeing to en bloc 1.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 243, the nays are 178. the amendments en bloc are adopted. without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid on the table. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the question on amendment 10 printed in house report 117-3 offered by the gentleman from arkansas. the clerk will redesignate the amendment. the clerk: amendment offered by mr. hill of arkansas. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from arkansas. as the member designated by -- members will record their votes

by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. mchenry of north carolina, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mchenry will vote yea

on the hill amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? mr. kildee: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. panetta of california, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. panetta will vote no

on the hill amendment. as the member designated by mrs. lawrence of michigan, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. lawrence will vote no on the hill amendment. as the member designated by mr. higgins of new york, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. higgins will vote no on the hill amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from massachusetts seek recognition?

ms. pressley: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. chuy garcia of illinois, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. garcia will be voting nay on agreeing to amendment 10. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from missouri seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. mccaul of texas, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mccaul will vote yes on the hill amendment to h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. long of missouri, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. long will vote yes on the hill amendment to h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr.

gosar of arizona, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. gosar will vote yes on the hill amendment to h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia seek recognition? mr. beyer: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. moulton, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. moulton about will vote no on the hill amendment. as the member designated by mr. kind, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. kind will vote no on the hill amendment. as the member designated by mr. doggett, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. dog let vote no on the hill amendment -- doggett will vote no on the hill amendment. as the member designated by mr. cohen, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. cohen will vote no on the hill amendment. as the member designated by ms. barragan, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. barragan will vote no on the hill amendment. as the member designated by mr. blumenauer, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. blumenauer will vote no on the hill amendment. as the member designated by mr.

lowenthal, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. lowenthal will vote no on the hill amendment. as the member designated by mr. lieu, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. lieu will vote no on the hill amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas rise? >> as the member designated by mr. carter of the great state of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. carter will vote yes on the hill amendment. as the member designated by mr. fallon of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. fallon will vote yes on the hill amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania rise? >> thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by mr. david scott of georgia, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. scott will

vote no on the hill amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by by mr. buchanan of the great state of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. buchanan will be a yes on amendment number 10 offered by mr. hill of arkansas. thank you. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia rise? >> thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by mr. mceachin, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. mceachin will vote no on the hill amendment. as the member designated by ms. porter, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. porter will vote no on the hill amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina rise? >> as the member designated by mr. price of north carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. price will vote no, he will vote no, on the hill amendment. as the member designated by mr. carson of indiana, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. carson will vote no, he will vote no, on the hill amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from hawaii rise? >> thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by mr. kehele of hawaii, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. kehele will vote no on agreeing to amendment number 10 offered by representative hill.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. amodei, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. amodei will vote yeah on rep

hill amendment number 10. as the member designated by mr. luetkemeyer of missouri, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. luetkemeyer will vote yea on rep hill amendment 10. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina rise? mr. butterfield: as the member designated by mr. bishop of georgia, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. bishop will vote no, he will vote no, on the hill amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. ruiz, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. ruiz will vote no on the hill amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from connecticut rise? >> thank you, mr. speaker. mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. john larson, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. larson will vote no on the hill amendment. as the member designated by mr. langevin, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. langevin will will also vote no on the hill amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york rise? >> as the member designated by chairwoman zoe lofgren, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that chairwoman lofgren will vote no on the hill amendment. as the member designated by chairwoman carolyn maloney, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that chairwoman maloney will vote no on the hill amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from michigan rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. axne,

pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. axne will vote no on the hill amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from north carolina rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. wilson of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. wilson will vote no on amendment 10 offered by mr. hill. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida rise? >> as the member designated by ms. castor, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. castor will vote yes on the hill amendment.

-- no on the hill amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from pennsylvania rise? >> as the member designated by ms. speier, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. speier will vote no on the hill amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania rise? >> as the member designated by mr. lawson of florida, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote no on the hill amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. meng, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. meng will vote no on the hill amendment. as the member designated by mr. lynch, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lynch will vote no on the hill amendment. as the member designated by ms. jayapal, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. jayapal will vote no on the hill amendment. as the member designated by ms. frankel, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. frankel will vote no on the -- i'm sorry, ms. jayapal

will vote no on the hill amendment. that ms. frankel will vote no on the hill amendment. as the member designated by mr. cooper, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. cooper will vote no on the hill amendment. as the member designated by mr. bowman, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. bowman will vote no on the hill amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california rise? mr. correa: mr. speaker, as the member designated by congress member roybal-allard, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that congress member

roybal-allard will vote no on the hill amendment. and, mr. speaker, as the member designated by congress member napolitano, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that congress member napolitano will vote no on the hill amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does -- for what purpose does the gentlewoman from california rise? ms. matsui: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. desaulnier, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. desaulnier will vote no on the hill amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from arizona rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. kirkpatrick, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. kirkpatrick will vote no on the hill amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois rise? ms. underwood: as the member designated by mr. rush, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. rush will vote no on the hill amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from massachusetts rise? mr. mcgovern: as the member designated by mrs. trahan of massachusetts, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. trahan will vote no on the hill amendment. as the member designated by mr. welch of vermont, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. welch will vote no on the hill amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland rise? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. krishnamoorthi of illinois, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. krishnamoorthi will vote no on the hill amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia rise? mr. connolly: mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. titus of nevada, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. titus will vote no on

the hill amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for

what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey rise? mr. pallone: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. bonnie watson coleman, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. watson coleman will vote no on the hill amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida rise? ms. wasserman schultz: as the member designated by mr. pape of numing, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. payne will vote nay on the hill amendment. as the member designated by mr. hastings of florida, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house

that mr. hastings will also vote nay on the hill amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california rise? >> as the member designated by mr. gallego, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. gay ageo will vote no on the hill amendment. as the member designated by mr. cardenas, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. cardenas will vote no. as the member designated by mr. gonzalez, i inform the house that mr. gone zell ezzville vote no. as the member designated by mr. villa, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. villa

will vote no on the hill amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the

gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? >> as the member designated by by mr. donald of the state of florida, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. donald will vote yay on the hill amendment. pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. walz will vote yea lyay on the hill amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote, the yeas are 186, the nays are 236. the amendment is not adopted. without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid upon the table. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the question of amendment 22 print ined house report 117-3 offered by the gentlewoman from new york. the clerk will redesignate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 22 brinted in part b of house report 117-3 offered by ms. stefanik of new york. the speaker pro tempore: the

question is on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from new york. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.]

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from arizona seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mrs. kirkpatrick, punt to h. res. 8 i inform the house that mrs. kirkpatrick will vote no on the stefanik amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee seek recognition?

>> as the member designated by de-desjarlais of tennessee, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. desjarlais will vote yea on the stefanik amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? mr. kildee: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. panetta of california, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. panetta will vote no on the stefanik amendment. as the member designated by mr. higgins of new york, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. higgins will vote no on the stefanik amendment. as the member designated by mrs. lawrence of michigan, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. lawrence will vote no on the stefanik amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition?

mr. arrington: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. buchanan of the great state of florida, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. buchanan will vote yes on amendment number 22 offered by ms. stefanik of new york. thank you and i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. gomez: as the member designated by mr. vela, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. vela will vote no on the stefanik amendment. as the member designated by mr. cardenas, prerz, i inform the house that mr. cardenas will vote no on the stefanik amendment. as the member designated by mr. vicente gonzalez, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. gonzalez will vote no on the stefanik amendment. as the member designated by mr. gallego, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. gallego will vote no on the stefanik amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. kelly: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. amodei of nevada, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. amodei will vote yea on rep stefanik's amendment number 22. as the member designated by mr. brooks from alabama, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. brooks will vote yea on rep stefanik's amendment number 22.

as the member designated by mr. luetkemeyer of missouri, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. luetkemeyer will vote yea on rep stefanik's substument amendment -- substitute amendment number 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from the great state of illinois seek recognition? ms. underwood: as the member designated by mr. rush, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. rush will vote no on the stefanik amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. kay granger, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. granger will vote yes on the stefanik amendment.

mr. arrington: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. ralph norman, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. norman will vote yes on amendment number 22, offered by ms. stefanik of new york. thank you and i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by mr. david scott of georgia, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. scott will vote no on the stefanik amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia seek recognition? mr. beyer: as the member designated by mr. kind, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. kind will vote no on the stefanik amendment. as the member designated by mr.

moulton, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. moulton will vote no on the stefanik amendment. as the member designated by mr. cohen, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. cohen will vote no on the stefanik amendment. as the member designated by mr. doggett, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that will doggett will vote no on the stefanik amendment. as the member designated by mr. blumenauer, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. blumenauer will vote no on the stefanik amendment. as the member designated by ms. barragan, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. barragan will vote no on the stefanik amendment. as the member designated by mr. lieu, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. lieu will vote no on the stefanik amendment. as the member designated by dr. lowenthal, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. lowenthal will vote no on the stefanik amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from missouri seek recognition? mrs. wagner: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. mccaul of texas, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mccaul will vote yes on the stefanik amendment to h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. long of missouri, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. long will vote yes on the stefanik amendment to h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. gosar of arizona, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. gosar will vote yes on the stefanik amendment to h.r. 447.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. jeffries: mr. speaker, as the member designated by chairwoman zoe lofgren, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that chairwoman lofgren will vote no on the stefanik amendment. as the member designated by chairwoman carolyn maloney, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that chairwoman maloney will vote no on the stefanik amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? mr. bucshon: as the member designated by mr. baird, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. baird will vote yea on the stefanik amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? mr. butterfield: as the member designated by mr. price of north carolina, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. price will vote no, he will vote no on the stefanik amendment. as the member designated by mr. bishop of georgia, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. bishop will vote no, will vote no on the stefanik amendment. as the member designated by mr. carson of indiana, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. carson will vote no on the stefanik amendment.

finally, mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. cuellar of texas, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. cuellar will vote no, he will vote no on the stefanik amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. carter from the great state of texas, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. carter will vote yea on the stefanik amendment. mr. nehls: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. fallon, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. fallon will vote yea on the stefanik amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: as the member designated by mr. payne, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. payne will

vote nay on the stefanik amendment. as the member designated by mr. hastings of florida, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. hastings will also vote nay on the stefanik amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from oklahoma seek recognition? mr. lucas: mr. speaker, as the

member designated by mr. mullen, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mullen will vote -- mr. mullin will vote yea on the stefanik amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman seek recognition? mr. evans:: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. -- mr. evans: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. lawson, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote nay on the stefanik amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia seek recognition? mr. connolly: mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. titus of nevada, pursuant to h.

res. 8, i inform the house that ms. titus will vote no on the stefanik amendment. 6 the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does gentlelady florida seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. donald of florida, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. donald will vote yes on the stefanik amendment. as the member designated by mr. walz of florida, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. walz will vote yes on the stefanik amendment. >> as the member designated by mr. john larson of connecticut, pursuant to h. res. 8, nouse that mr. larson will vote no. as the member designated by mr.

langevin of rhode island, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. langevin will vote no on the stefanik amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does gentlelady massachusetts seek recognition? mr. clarke: as the member designated by mr. bowman, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. bowman will vote no on the stefanik amendment. as the member designated by mr. cooper, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. cooper will vote no. zegged ms. frankel, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. frankel will vote no. as the member designated by ms. jayapal, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. jayapal will vote no.

as the member designated by mr. lynch, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. lynch will vote no. as the member designated by ms. meng, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. meng will vote no on the stefanik amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does gentlelady washington seek recognition? >> as the member designated by representative kathy mrs. mcmorris rodgers, pursuant to house resolution 965, i inform the house that ms. mrs. mcmorris rodgers will vote yes on stefanik amendment 22. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does gentlelady from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. speier, pursuant to h. res.

8, i inform the house that ms. speier will vote no on the stefanik amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does -- >> i'm from the commonwealth of virginia. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from virginia seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. mceachin pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mceachin will vote no. as the member designated by ms. porter, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. porter will vote no on the stefanik amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from massachusetts seek recognition? mr. mcgovern: as the member designated by mrs. trahan, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. trahan will vote no. as the member designated by mr. welch, pursuant to h. res. 8, i

inform the house that mr. welch will vote no on the stefanik amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from california seek recognition? >> pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. deep sean iowa will vote no on the stefanik amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ong member roybal-allard, punt to house resolution 8, i inform the house that misroybal-allard will vote no on the stefanik

amendment. and mr. speaker, as the member designated by as congress member napolitano, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress member napolitano will vote no on the stefanik amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: sfrop the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? as the member designated by mr. mchenry of north carolina, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mchenry will vote yes on the stefanik amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from michigan seek recognition? mr. dingell: -- ms. stevens: as the member designated by mrs. axne, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. axne will vote no on the stefanik amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by representative aguilar, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. aguilar will vote no on the stefanik amendment. as the member designated by representative ruiz from

california, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. ruiz will vote no on the stefanik amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from florida seek recognition? mrs. demings: as the member designated by ms. castor, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. castor will vote no on the stefanik amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from north carolina seek recognition? ms. adams: mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. wilson, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. wilson will vote no on the stefanik amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. calvert of california, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. calvert will vote yes on the stefanik amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? mr. brown: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. krishnamoorthi of illinois, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. krishnamoorthi will vote no on the stefanik amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from hawaii seek recognition? >> thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by mr. kahele of hawaii, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. kahele will vote no on agreeing to amendment number 22 offered by ms. stefanik.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. bonnie watson coleman, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. watson coleman will vote no on the stefanik amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from massachusetts seek recognition? ms. pressley: as the member designated by mr. chuy garcia of illinois, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. garcia will be voting nay on agreeing to amendment number 22.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 175, the nays are 245. the amendment is not adopted.

without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid on the table. the previous question is ordered on the bill as amended. the question is on engrossment and third reading of the bill, as amend. those in favor say aye. those opposed, no. the ayes have it. the ayes have it. third reading. the clerk: a bill to amend the act of august 16, 1937, commonly referred to as the national apprenticeship act, and expand the national apprenticeship system to include apprenticeships, use apresent -- youth apprenticeships under such act to promote the furtherance of labor standards necessary to safeguard the welfare of apprentices and for other purposes. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on passage of the bill. those in favor say aye. those opposed, no. the ayes have it. >> mr. speaker.

the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady from north carolina. ms. foxx: on that i demand the yeas and nays. the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to section 3-s of house resolution 8, the yeas and nays are ordered. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? mr. kildee: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. lawrence of michigan, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. lawrence will vote yes on h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. higgins of new york, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. higgins will vote yes on h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. panetta of california, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. panetta will vote yes on h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from missouri seek recognition? mrs. wagner: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. mccaul of texas, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house

that mr. mccaul will vote nay on passage of h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. long of missouri, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. long will vote nay on passage of h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. gosar of arizona, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. gosar will vote nay on passage of h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from north carolina seek recognition? ms. adams: thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by ms. wilson of florida, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. wilson will vote yes on h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by mr. buchanan of the great state of florida, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. buchanan will vote no on passage of h.r. 447. as the member designated by ms. kay granger of the great state of texas, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms.

granger will be a no on the passage of h.r. 447. mr. arrington: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. norman of the great state of south carolina, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. norman will vote no on the passage of h.r. 447. thank you, and i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does -- the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. krishnamoorthi of illinois, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform

the house that mr. krishnamoorthi will vote yes on h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. calvert of california, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. calvert will vote no on h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from arizona seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mrs. kirkpatrick, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. kirkpatrick will vote yes on h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. desjarlais of

tennessee, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. desjarlais will vote nay on h.r. 447. mr. kustoff: as the member designated by mr. timmons of south carolina, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. timmons will vote nay on h.r. 447. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? cray cray mr. speaker, as the member designated by -- mr. correa: mr. speaker, as the member designated by congress member roybal-allard, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that congress member roybal-allard will vote yes on h.r. 447. and, mr. speaker, as the member designated by congress member napolitano, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that congress member napolitano will vote yes on h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from florida seek recognition? >> thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by mr. donalds of florida, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house

that mr. donalds will vote nay on h.r. 447. mrs. cammack: as the member designated by mr. waltz, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. waltz will vote nay on h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? ms. wexton: as the member designated by mr. eachin, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. eachin will vote -- mr. mceachin will vote yes on h.r. 447. as the member designated by ms. porter, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. porter will vote yes on h.r. 447.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. mchenry, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mchenry will vote nay on h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman rise? mr. cartwright: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. scott, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. scott will vote yes on h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. kelly: as the member

designated by mr. amodei of nevada, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. amodei will vote no on h.r. 447. mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. brooks from alabama, mr. brooks will vote no on h.r. 447. mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. luetkemeyer from missouri, mr. luetkemeyer will vote no on h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek

recognition? california. mr. gomez: as the member designated by mr. gallego, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. gallego will vote aye on h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. cardenas, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. cardenas will vote aye on h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. vicente gonzalez, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. vicente gonzalez will vote yea on h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. vela, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. vela will vote aye on h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? mr. bucshon: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. baird,

pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. baird will vote no on h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. carbajal: as the member designated by mr. ruiz, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. ruiz will vote yes on h.r. 447.

as the member designated by representative aguilar, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. aguilar will vote yes on h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from the state of washington seek recognition? ms. herrera beutler: as the member designated by representative mcmorris rodgers, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. rodgers will vote no on h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from florida seek recognition? mrs. demings: as the member designated by ms. castor, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. castor will vote yes on h.r. 447.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? mr. nehls: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. carter from the great state of texas, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. carter will vote no on h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. fallon from the great state of texas, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. fallon will vote no on house resolution 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from massachusetts seek recognition? ms. pressley: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. chuy garcia of illinois, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. garcia will be voting yea on final passage of h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from oklahoma seek recognition? mr. lucas: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. mullin, and pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. mullin will vote no.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. bonnie watson coleman, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. watson coleman will vote yes on h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from hawaii seek recognition? mr. case: thank you, mr.

speaker. as the member designated by mr. kahele, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. kahele will vote yes on h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from florida seek recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. payne of new jersey, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. payne will vote yea on h.r. 447. and mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. hastings of florida, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. hastings will vote yea on h.r. 447.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from massachusetts seek recognition? ms. clark: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. bowman, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. bowman will vote yes on h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. cooper, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. cooper will vote yes on h.r. 447. as the member designated by ms. frankel, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. frankel will vote yes on h.r. 447. as the member designated by ms. jayapal, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. jayapal will vote yes on h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. lynch, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. lynch will vote yes on h.r. 447. as the member designated by ms. meng, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. meng will vote yes on h.r. 447.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. jeffries: as the member designated by chairwoman zoe lofgren, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that chairwoman lofgren will vote yea on h.r. 447. as the member designated by chairwoman carolyn maloney, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that chairwoman maloney will vote yea on h.r.

447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from pennsylvania seek recognition? ms. scanlon: as the member designated by ms. speier, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. speier will vote yes on h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from illinois seek recognition? ms. underwood: as the member designated by mr. rush, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. rush will vote yes on h.r. 447.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the distinguished gentlelady from the great state of michigan seek recognition? ms. stevens: mr. speaker, as the

member designated by mrs. axne, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. axne will vote yes on h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the distinguished gentleman from the nutmeg state seek recognition? mr. courtney: thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by mr. john larson of connecticut, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. larson will vote yes on h.r. 447. mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. langevin of rhode island, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. langevin will vote yes on h.r. 447.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? mr. butterfield: as the member designated by mr. price of north carolina, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. price will vote yes on h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. bishop of georgia, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. bishop will vote yes on h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. carson of indiana, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. carson will vote yes on h.r. 447. finally, mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. cuellar of texas, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. cuellar will vote yes on h.r. 447.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the distinguished gentleman from the commonwealth of pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. evans: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. lawson of florida, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yea on h.r. 447.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from the commonwealth of virginia seek recognition? mr. beyer: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. blumenauer of oregon, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. blumenauer will vote yes on h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. kind of wisconsin, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. kind will vote yes on h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. moulton of massachusetts, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. moultland vote yes on h.r. 4 -- moulton will vote yes on h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. lieu of california, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. lieu will vote yes on h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. cohen of tennessee, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. cohen will vote yes on h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. lowenthal of california, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. lowenthal will vote yes on h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. doggett of texas, pursuant to

h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. doggett will vote yes on h.r. 447. as the member designated by ms. barragan of california, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. barragan will vote yes on h.r. 447. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from massachusetts seek recognition? mr. mcgovern: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. trahan of massachusetts, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. trahan will vote yes on h.r. 447. as the member designated by mr. welch of vermont, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. welch will vote yes on h.r. 447.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlelady from california seek recognition? ms. matsui: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. desaulnier, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. desaulnier will vote yes on h.r. 447.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia seek recognition? mr. connolly: mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. titus of nevada, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. titus will vote yes on h.r. 447.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 247. the nays are 173. the bill is passed. without objection, a motion to

reconsider is laid on the table. for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, i hereby removed remove myself as a co-sponsor of h.r. 804 which i was inadvertently put on. the speaker pro tempore: the request is accepted. the chair will now entertain requests for one-minute speeches. for what purpose does the gentlelady from new mexico seek recognition? >> thank you, mr. speaker. i ask unanimous consent to address the house for one minute and to revise and extend my remarks. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentlelady is recognized for one minute. >> mr. speaker, today i rise to honor new mexico state police

officer darian jarrott. he was shot and killed yesterday, february 4, after he stopped a vehicle while assisting with a homeland security investigation. ms. herrell: he was 28 years old and leaves behind three children and the fourth on the way. officer jarrott joined the state police in 2015 after beginning his career as a transportation inspector with the new mexico department of public safety. he served his community with honor and distinction and was known among his colleagues to always have a smile on his face no matter how tough a situation was. officer jarrott was someone who wanted to help people, someone who wanted to do the right thing, and was loved by his community. we need more officers like him. we owe so much to officer jarrott and so many others who answer the call to duty and make

the ultimate sacrifice. his death reminds us of the debt we owe the brave men and women who stand in the gap to protect us from evil. my prayers are with officer jarrott's family. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from texas seek recognition? ms. jackson lee: mr. speaker, i skek ask to address the house and to revise and extend for one minute. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, so ordered. ms. jackson lee: this is a daunting and overwhelming responsibility that this country has and that is to defeat covid-19 and to win this war against the pandemic. if you take a survey of your different states, you'll find there is an uneven, uneven

approach to distribution. there are megacenters, small centers, and there are no centers. i am reintroducing my covid-19 delivery act of 2021 that sets out a protocol dealing with the nationalization of federalization of distribution so that distribution is organized to the extent that every part of america knows when their vaccines will come. we'll put a national app so that public health entities can know when their doses will come. we will find a logistical scheme so that fema can manage the distribution across the nation. and we will purposely design it so that hard-to-reach neighborhoods, communities of minorities will be found and that we begin to massively vaccinate people across the nation. we have to save lives. 594,000 may die by may. please co-sponsor the 2021 covid-19 delivery act.

it is going to make a difference. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> i seek unanimous consent to address the house for one minute and to revise and extend my remarks. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentleman is recognized for one minute. mr. lamalfa: the biden administration had 25 executive orders, by far the most of any president during this span. clearly all this rhetoric about unity, to use his favorite word, malarkey. this week the president signed three more executive orders to destroy progress we made on immigration and border security. he reversed president trump's public charge rule, that rule prevented immigrants likely to rely on social welfare programs from accessing green cards. the asylum seekers will no

longer be required to wait in mexico while being processed, which is a common dubious against asylum claims. it waves them in. this power has been transferred from the proper agencies now to the white house where immigration no doubt will be politicized. americans are suffering. many need work. their jobs have been shut down because of the corona china virus. how can we put our borders wide open? we must together the needs of american citizens, not these others. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: under the speaker's announced policy of january 4, 2021, the gentleman from texas, mr. gohmert, is recognized for 60 minutes as the designee of the minority leader.

mr. gohmert: thank you, mr. speaker. interesting days in the capitol. i keep being asked about the metal detector. i was not happy about metal detectors, but for some weeks now, i've been complying, putting my stuff out, putting them on the table, going through the metal detector. i did that yesterday and came in here, and i was going to be recognized to speak. since restroom is right there right through that door, you see it as you're standing there at the door, i did what i've done for a number of weeks now, went to the restroom and came back. since the officers see you and they -- there was nobody else in the area, as there usually isn't these days, went in, came out,

and so people know -- didn't like the godfather. there are no tanks on the toilets. no place to hide a gun i've seen. anyways, the officer sees you and no one has ever said a word about needing to be re-examined when you are just right there. anyway, apparently rules have changed over the last few weeks. all of a sudden yesterday, i was told, well, you need to be wanded. no, i've been through the metal detector. this has never been required before. so i came in. today, i get a notice that i'm supposed to be fined $5,000. so things that are not supposed to happen is arbitrary and

capriciousness and to go for a number of weeks and nobody ever say a word because you're just going right there and back, never having to be re-examined and then all of a sudden yesterday and today be hit with a $35,000 fine. -- with a $5,000 fine. mr. speaker, i want our colleagues to know that it's the metal detectors are not the issue entirely. you may want to use facilities at your office or around your office, because now, despite the admonition in the constitution itself about not stopping or detaining a member of congress on his way into a session -- it's in the constitution -- the speaker has seen fit to defy that, to create metal detectors,

and now that's not enough. you can't even go to the restroom in full view of the officers without being hit upon and unconstitutionally treated again. i've been going along with the unconstitutional action anyway. just -- but it seems that it's one of those things, no matter how much you finally are descent advertised to the constitution enough -- desensitized with the constitutional enough, there keeps being another requirement, another requirement, another requirement. so we will see how it all comes out. but hopefully other members will learn from the arbitrariness of my treatment to avoid that for themselves. on fox news, my friend, tucker carlson, had touched on

yesterday that -- and this article is by tucker -- there's been an enormous amount of talk, not just this week, but over the last month about violent extremism and the people who embrace it. those people, we're told, are domestic terrorists who must be put down by force. . the war on terror has moved stateside and we must hunt them down. we are hearing those words nonstop, not just on cable news but from elected fills including some republicans. we are hearing it from the leaders of federal law enforcement agencies and the intelligence agencies. we are hearing it from the pentagon. just this week secretary of defense lloyd austin, ordered the entire u.s. military to stand down while investigators

cleanse the ranks of political extremeists. and of course, we are hearing it from the business establishment, from wall street and tech monopolies, from the multinational corporations that increasingly control the contours of american life. all of them are in the hunt of political extremists. by the way, with regard to the effort to purge the military of anybody with a political position that does not support socialism, you know, my four years at fort beening, georgia, about half of that under commander in chief carter and the other -- about half, under

commander in chief reagan, there were a lot of people at fort beening that didn't care for what was happening to the military under president carter. but we knew you could not say anything derogatory about the commander in chief without being either punished with an article 15, nonjudicial punishment, or being prosecuted, because he was the commander in chief. but everybody, democrat, republican or now lots of socialists, as long as you did your job in the military and you followed orders, you didn't have any problem. but we were not heard to talk about the terrible morale under president carter the way we were

no longer respected, the way internationally, especially after the failed hostage rescue attempt that i believe had more to do with civilian oversight restrictions than it was anything else. i was told by people at fort beening that the president, white house was warned, if you make us go in with so few helicopters, there is a good chance we won't have the six needed to rescue the hostages. we knew where they were and they were mailed to scale to eight. so when they lost three on the way to the staging area, then it was an automatic abort, according to one of my he -- my friends that was part of it. we ended up losing a chopper.

but still, we didn't go out and didn't hear us trashing the carter white house because we were in the military. our political opinions didn't matter. even if people had contempt for the poor leadership in the white house. didn't say it, because it was not allowed. and people, despite their political positions were ready to lay down their lives for their country, that that was necessary. some did. even though that's a time of peace. the four years i was in, we were never in a declared action or war. still, we did our jobs, no

matter what it was. and nobody was run out of the military for their political positions. but now, under this administration, things have changed. and as tucker carlson goes on, he says, you have to be more precise. in order to root out a problem, you have to know what the problem is. you need a sense of what you are looking for, a clear picture. you have to define the terms. remarkable thing about this conversation we are having is that no one is doing that. have you noticed none of this is newly energized and power hunters have told us what an extremist is. we are left to guess and look around nervously to see if we can spot one. they are not talking about us, and if they are, what are they

doing? how are they hunting these extremists that they keep telling us about? we know now the answer to that question. and tuck kerr carlson has evidence that bank of america, the second largest bank in the country with more than 60 million customers, is actively but secretly engaged in the hunt for extremists in cooperation with the government. bank of america is without the knowledge -- bank america is without the knowledge or consent of its customers sharing private information with federal law enforcement agencies. bank of america effectively is acting as an intelligence agency but not telling you about it. after the days after january 6 riot at the capitol, bank of

america went through the trans actional records. these were the private records of americans who committed no crime. people as far as we know, had nothing to do with what happened at the capitol. but at the request of federal investigators, bank of america searched its data bases looking for people who fit a specific profile. here's what the profile was. number one, customers confirmed as transacting through through debit or credit card purchases in washington d.c. between january 5 and january 6. number two, purchases made for hotel, airbnb in d.c., virginia, maryland, after january 6.

any purchase of weapons or at a weapons-related merchant between january 7 and their upcoming suspected stay in the d.c. day around inauguration day and airline purchases since january 6. first thing you should if notice about the profile. any purchases of anything in washington d.c., any overnight stay spanning three jurisdictions and hundreds of miles, any purchase not just to legal firearms but anything bought from a weapons-related merchants, t-shirts included and any airline-related washington, from omaha to thailand. that is an absurdly wide net. bank of america identified 211

customers who met these thresholds of interests. at that point, tucker carlson has learned that bank of america turned over the results to federal authorities apparently without notifying the customers who were being spied upon. federal investigators than interviewed at least one of these people. that person had done nothing, hadn't done anything wrong and was cleared. imagine if you are that person. the f.b.i. hauls you in for questioning in a terror investigation not because you have done anything wrong or suspicious but because you bought plane tickets. this is your country's capital. and your bank which you trust with your most private

information has ratted you out without your knowledge because bank of america did that and you are being treated like a member of al qaeda. doesn't matter how much you despise donald trump or you believe the hatred of trump suspends this country's civil liberties, going through this, does anyone else know about this? is there a record of this interview? will i lose my job because of that? that actually happened to someone. any way, he goes on and points out this issue of banks handing over information and took me back in time to the george w. bush presidency when i girs got to congress and i first learned

something about national security letters. that was a shock to me to find about national security letters because i have a litigant, i have been a felony judge and chief justice and i was quite familiar with reviewing affidavits in support of requests for warrants and i reviewed them at all hours of the day and night. most of the time because law enforcement in my jurisdiction was told by the d.a. they needed to go through the d.a.'s office to make sure that the warrants made -- met the constitutional requirements. it was rare but sometimes i did say, you don't have facts that create probable cause to believe

that a crime has been committed or probable cause to believe this person committed it. we need some facts here that you can swear to under oath that will allow me to sign a warrant so that places may be searched and specific things described with particularity, can be seized. so having had that history, i was quite surprised to find under the patriot act and actually this note is from the electronic frontier foundation, i'm really familiar with them, but have a good synopsis on national security letters, the electronic communications act, right to financial privacy act, which is kind of ironic, only

probable cause to get your records under the financial privacy act. that's amazing. fair credit reporting act. and also the u.s.a. patriot act. so the way they work and this article describes it pretty well, although there are procedures for review after they are should, national security letters can be should by the f.b.i. without any judicial oversight. the f.b.i. must certify that the records sought are quote relevant to an authorized investigation toll protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities, unquote. we were assured during the re-authorization of the patriot act that -- this was only used

to go against or to investigate foreigners who were either part of a known terrorist organization or known terrorist themselves or had relations with a known foreign terrorist organization, i had asked in one of my meetings with justice department people, well, what about the other reason you can send out a national security letter and just siphon up somebody's records from a third party and that is called clandestine intelligence activities. and they said we don't use that. i said i would like to know what that means, clandestine intelligence activities. does that mean if my next-door neighbor is hiding behind the curtain and watching what is going on at my house, that's

clandestine, seeking intelligence what is happening next door, that mean you can scoop up all their records? and the answer is we don't really use that part. well, that was so vague, but it bothered me. but our chairman at the time was jim sense senbrener and not about to -- sensenbrenner and not alouing. it is still there, 15, 16 years later. and we kept being assured by everybody there are never any abuses to the national security letter, but it concerned me that if all it took an f.b.i. agent signing something saying i need this for investigation, who is to be sure it really does? i like the warrant system where

you have to go to a judge and establish with particularity the person to be seized or the things to be seized or the place to be searched i remember when i was an assistant d.a., we had an interesting deputy that people would kind of roll their eyes about, he was constantly coming in asking for a warrant. and as assistant d.a., i got to know him. nice guy. but he came in once and said, you know, i know, i've been harassing, trying to get a warrant, i know there's people smoking dope out in this little bitty community but they have a little -- a little bitty store there and i found out the people i think are smoking dope have --

are going to have a party friday night and i've got good authority they're going to have potato chips there and that little store was just recently burglarized late at night and they -- one of the things they took was potato chips so i want to get a warrant to go in these people's home, looking for potato chips an then i'll look for the dope while i'm there. and i said, well, is there any way to identify the potato chips that were in this store that were stolen? no, no, but see, that's beauty, while i'm looking for potato chips i'll just kind of look around for dope. i said you don't -- you -- that's not adequate to get probable -- to establish probable cause to go busting into somebody's house looking for potato chips. if you can't identify, they came and they were the ones that were stolen.

anyway, he was very upset that i wouldn't draft up the application for warrant, his affidavit. he thought he had a great way to do it. what i didn't know back then was that there'd be federal statutes after 9/11 established, you don't need to go get a judge to say yes, probable cause to believe crime was committed and this person did it, or probable cause to believe that you could find the fruits of a crime at a particular described location. no, no. you just have an f.b.i. agent send a national security letter saying, i'm investigating a matter and i need you to give me all the records you have on a certain individual or a certain business and by the way, under

this n.s.l. law, if you tell anybody that you've got this demand for records, then you will have committed a felony and we'll prosecute you. now back then, it didn't say you could even tell your lawyer, but the -- president -- but the president george w. bush administration department said, but we're interpreting it to mean that somebody that receives a national security letter demand for production can talk to their lawyer. we won't prosecute anybody for talking to their own lawyer. wasn't that generous? but we were assured both privately in meetings and under testimony that there were no violations, no known violations of the law on national security

letters, it was always to go after foreign terrorists or people what associated with foreign terrorist groups. that's what we're doing. it still was a concern. that just seems like so much power. and eventually it was included that gee, you had to get a higher up approval before you sent out the national security letter. but the attorney general at the time, good, decent guy, alberto gonzales, and he had indicated that he was not aware of any known violations of the law under the national security letter, the n.s.l. laws.

and unfortunately for him, he testified before -- and i don't have any of the information, i'm just going off my institutional memory from those days, that he had testified before the senate, a senate committee, that yeah, there were no known violations of the law on national security letters. well, unfortunately for him, there was a d.o.j. inspector genre port, as i recall, it had been on his desk for three days, and the i.g. said there may be more than 3,000, or as many as 3,000, violations of the law in gathering information under national security letters, where f.b.i. agents just wanted to fine out about somebody, some business. so they sent a letter demanding records about the person or the

business, saying give me all you got on this person or business when there was not a case, there was not probable cause of anything, there was not a known terrorist involved or known terrorist organization, they just wanted information about somebody, something, and so sent them out. and i had seen that mr. schumer, senator schumer, was really upset. he felt like they'd been lied to. when he found out that there'd been an i.g. report three days before that the attorney general had when he said there were no known violations. and i ran into senator schumer here on the hill, i think it was the next day, within a couple of

days, and i said, say, i saw you had our attorney general, giving him a hard time about the violations of the national security letter. that's something i've beenup set about. and then to find out there may have been more than 3,000 violations, just fishing expeditions, and he said some things that were not complimentary about the head of the justice department, and he said, you know, i don't know why the president doesn't just, you know, let him go an hire somebody else. i said, i can tell you why he doesn't, and that's because figure you would not allow a new appointee to get through committee and we don't need to go, i think it was a year and a half left, without a real attorney general.

and he said no, look, there are people i know we could agree on if they would just -- if they would just try but he felt like we needed a new attorney general. the thing is, the f.b.i. director at that time was a guy named mueller. and it was really a problem that should have fallen directly at the feet of the director mueller , it's his f.b.i. he could have supervised them more thoroughly. especially when we're talking about thousands of abuses of people's rights and abuses of the national security letter use, seizing people's information, personal as it is. but i thought about all of that when i'm seeing that bank of america had turned over all this information to the federal authorities, the f.b.i., i

guess, and it made me wonder if maybe they were back to their old ways of abusing the n.s.l.'s, and no probable cause that a particular person committed a crime, at all. just on fishing expeditions. i wondered if maybe they used the n.s.l.'s to go on those fishing expeditions and caught lots of honest, innocent americans in their net. now going back to that, when e-- when i first got here, we had a lot of friends on the democrat side of the aisle that were extremely concerned about civil rights and just like senator schumer was extremely upset to find out the f.b.i. had violated

potentially thousands of people's basic civil rights, seizing information about them without having any probable cause, violating the fourth amendment, and possibly fifth. but that was a different time. in fact, i was concerned and i called the white house asking for the chief of staff, josh bolton at the time, and i felt like he was a really good, decent guy, and he was in a meeting with president bush at the time but he called me back. and i told him about the concerns that a lot of people on both sides of the aisle are upset that our republican administration was abusing people's rights like that, just using national security letters willy nily and that we needed

some change and they couldn't do it unless they knew they had an agreement to get through somebody else. what i should have done, i made a mistake. i should have been demanding that mueller go and get a different f.b.i. director. but anyway, i is suggested -- i suggested somebody who could talk friendly with senator schumer, give him a call, see if they couldn't agree on some replacements. anyway, we ended up with attorney general mukasey, i felt like a very honorable man. i had nothing to do with who was picked. but apparently there was an agreement between the white house and senator schumer, others potentially. but all of that came back to mind as i saw that a bank, i

think the biggest -- second biggest in the country, was turning over information without apparently getting any warrants. but really it's a problem of the national security letter. and i've heard, you know, we got into discussion back in re-authorization, heard from the department of justice saying, look, this is such an important tool. i'm going but it's so easily abused. there's got to be more checks and balances here. and back at the time democrats on the judiciary committee here in the house were concerned but there were not enough of us concerned to completely radically change the national security letter laws or to do away with it, so they're still

around, all these years later. and i'm hoping that we can get some people on both sides of the aisle, democrats are in the majority. i would love to see a hearing where we could get down to it, if it needs to be under classified conditions, closed, whatever. but we really need to take another look at this. because it could just completely depend on the administration and i would hope that maybe with as much hatred as some people have for former president trump, maybe the thought, gee, what if he got re-elected, then he could put people in place that used those national security letters

to go after all the people he didn't like. maybe that would be enough to encourage people who hate former president trump to actually take some action to really try to secure people's civil rights that have been violated for years. and all and under the guise, we are protecting ourselves from eeth they are terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities, whatever that is. so any way that came back to mind. that is still something that should be done. there is a story, my staff was able to find from the "new york times" back in 2007 when they

were a little more trustworthy, but it talks -- it is entitled f.b.i. head admits mistakes and use of security act. and that was mr. mueller, embracing the responsibility for the laps is, but he was punished by given two extra years as director of the f.b.i. that allowed him to continue the poor supervision that allowed these kind of what he called lapses. and in this article, it says, quote, how could this happen? unquote. mr. mueller asked in a briefing at the briefing of the f.b.i., who is to be held accountable? and the answer is, i am to be

held accountable, unquote. but the truth is, he was never held accountable. in fact, he was actually rewarded and attorney general gonzalez paid the price for his huge failure. so that is rather tragic. that's something i'm hoping that we could work together on, democrats and republicans, because civil rights, it appears, are being trampled once again. i don't know if there was a pause in the trampling, but regardless, we need to be doing some serious oversight. now i have an article here from

yale, desantis bracing for big fight. he said we are buckled up. and that is another area where it's not the government that is abusing people's rights, but it's the high tech. and recently, reread george orwell "1984" and "1947," he was dying and from cancer and had gone to scotland and been through treatment that was pretty rough and some thought that helped him on imagination of how people could be tortured. incredible. in the late 1940's, there were very, very few televisions around. and i knew when i grew up in east texas, there were hardly

any at all until 1953, there were very few. here it is after world war ii and george orwell is talking about this big brother and of course under the rules of the house, we are not supposed to talk about brothers, but this big sibling is the word we are supposed to use. so big sibling watched and listened to everything that everybody did and they would use a sell he screen, which back then there were no flat screen screens. televisions were rare and this guy is already imagining that someday the government will be watching you through this big screen and that's your phone and

your computer. and i know, i have heard from an intelligence friend, they could watch people through their camera on their computer. and so i started putting a little sticky note on my computer and one day in the judiciary committee, the head of the f.b.i. came in and he had a sticky note over the camera of his computer and i thought he knows what they do and if he is putting a sticky note over his camera, maybe he doesn't want to be watched by big sibling either. but, any way, now the big-tech industry can watch everything you do, everything you look up, they can listen to you.

we had our i.t. helper come in and i just don't like the idea that somebody whether or not in high-tech or government, could be watching or listening when no crime has been committed, i ask the i.t. guys, i just hate siri and siri's voice came up and said that's not nice. whoa. not have siri or alexa. no crimes are being committed. it's not a crime to go to the bathroom, even though i'm being fined $5,000 for it and hopefully that will be corrected.

george orwell foresaw that this big sibling would be out there someday watching and listening. so i really appreciate my old representative, congressman friend, ron desan antonio ties as -- did he san antonio is. he took aim of the country's largest technology companies which he characterized as a group of monopoly communications plaintiffs based on how they have grown to regulate discourse. and he equated to political manipulation, reiterating a belief that silicon valley is

biased and against right-leaning view points. and an article in "time" magazine by molly ball, the shadow history of the 2020 election. and characterizes, i say she, but molly may be a guy. but characterizes as what is being justified but trying to save the election for then senator biden and it is quite interesting, but there is no question there was tremendous manipulation of information by the high-tech industry, even though that person, molly has a different perspective. but governor said we think this is something that will

floridians want protection from and it will be a good step that he told tucker carlson. there is a question what do you do about this. we thought there was something wrong for a long time but to sit back and hope it gets better. that clearly isn't going to work and we are leading and think it would be good. the article says in an effort to keep big tech out of florida's political atmosphere, did he san antonio ties proposed a number of measures including a fine not going to the rest room right off the floor but platforms that depolitical candidates. actions taken by candidates to promote a candidate will be considered campaign.

and user rights as well, including allowing individuals in the florida attorney general to sue companies over individual protections as well as companies to provide full disclosures of actions taken against the individuals for violating policy. quote, it's not just being banned from twitter. these companies can clued. they can deny you if you are a small business, payment processing, the ability to use email and texan go to a rally that you don't like or engage in wrong think and all of a sudden your flower business is decap tated for a month because they take action. the republican acknowledged that it will cause a big fight in the legislative session. most folks don't or do want

protections for their privacy and data. most folks want protection from being deplaffed. i think it will be positively received but we are buckled up. but there are always fights over these things, so stay tuned. so we'll see what happens. but in the meantime, i'm sure some would want to blame it on conservatives or republicans, but this report out, that the 2020 homicide rate is so high there is no modern precedent. but if you look at what about the 2020 homicide rate so high, there is no modern precedent. we are talking about the group that had been protesting, looting, even though the

lamestream media calls it peaceful, the looting, the killing, the brutalizing, the fires -- they are trying to kill and burn police in their own station, those things have gone on and until the capitol was invaded, which is totally wrong, doesn't matter if democrat, republican, socialist or whatever, doesn't matter, it's wrong. and despite and now quoting the speaker and her comment about riots in the streets across the street, i do not advocate for violence. never have. don't advocate for violence. as a historian, and i never quit studying history, reading, finding out more, it's very

clear that some things do help trigger violence. and just as if you seal a heating pressure cooker, it's going to create a terrible reaction. and as i pointed out before, you know, we have, in this country, we created courts and in some cases, it's the legislative job, but to resolve dispute civilly and then normally avoids violence. sometimes we have violence that erupts in courtrooms. that happens. as i told people in my courtroom, the courts are often the last civil place where we work. we punish people for violence but this is where we come to

civilly resolve dispute and when you have courts repeatedly refuse to even have a hearing, take evidence and resolve dispute, it does create problems. and i don't want those problems. i don't want violence, from anybody. and that's how we safely -- the odds are that you increase chances of not having violence when our institutions, to resolve dispute civilly do that. and i hope that's what we will do here and do a better job of it and has been done. but it used to be during the revolution, one of the most common expressions often attributed to voltaire and maybe

said it before voltair emp but that is the line, i agree with what you say but i will defend to the right to say it. and now we have come to a place in america where people feel like, i disagree with what you say, i hate you, i hate your family, i'm going to try to get you fired and i hope we can get you put in jail. and i hope your children die and never get a job and can't take care of themselves. it's it's gotten very vicious in this country. i was raised in a family where meals were lively, everybody was intelligent, we had some heated discussions. but we still loved each other. and i mean, there are people in

this body that i really love them. you know. i think they're wrong about really critical issues. but we can come in here and argue and debate and fuss and in here, since i've been here, maybe one time different, but when people in here say, we're going to fight this, they're not talking about violence, they're talking about debate. that's what i'm talking about. but we need to get back to the institutions designed under federal and state constitution, to resolve disputes civilly and that -- one of the problems with this whole russia hoax, you

know, the guy that was slam dunk guilty of fraud upon the fisa court, and of lying under oath, was just allowed to plead and get probation and i said when the article came out, i think it was december of 2019, that clinesmith has changed the information to help them, what amounted to be illegally get a warrant against somebody in the trump campaign, i said, oh, i hope they're not going to use him as a scapegoat when there's so many in the d.o.j. or f.b.i. that lied under oath, they committed what certainly appeared to be crimes. i will say durham entirely dropped the ball. the information should have been out long ago so people would know what was true and not have

to rely on big tech to lie to them or manipulate them. but they dropped the ball. and so it appears to many people that there's a double standard when it comes to justice. if you're a part of the d.o.j., f.b.i., intelligence and you favor democrats, it appears you get a better deal. but we will see. this is friday, and mr. speaker, i know it's friday and i'm told i'm the last speaker of the day. you've been immensely gracious and i hope you have a good weekend. but i do yield back at this time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back. pursuant to section 5-a-1-b of house resolution 8, the house stands adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on monday, february 8, 2021.