the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 223.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 223. the nays are 202. the amendment is adopted. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20 the unfinished business is the question on the amendment 36 printed in part c of house

report 117-125 offered by the gentleman from georgia, mr. johnson, on which further proceedings were postponed and on which the yeas and nays were ordered. the clerk will redesignate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 36 printed in part c of house report 117-125 offered by mr. johnson of georgia. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from georgia. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman seek recognition? mr. cicilline: mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. sewell, the yellow hammer state, and pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. sewell will vote yes on the johnson amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman

from south carolina seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. rice of south carolina, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. rice will vote nay on johnson amendment number 36. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts seek recognition? ms. clark: as the member designated by ms. frankel, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. frankel will vote yes on the johnson amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from indiana seek recognition? mrs. walorski: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. wagner of missouri, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. wagner of missouri will vote no on the johnson amendment number 36. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. tonko: mr. speaker, as the member designated by representative morrelle, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that representative morrelle will vote aye on the johnson amendment. and as the member designated by representative higgins, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that representative higgins will vote aye on the johnson amendment.

thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? mr. walberg: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. latta of ohio, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. latta will vote no on the johnson amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? mr. kildee: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. ryan of ohio, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. ryan will vote yes on the johnson amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. calvert: as the member designated by mr. carter of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. carter will vote no on passage of the johnson amendment. as the member designated by mr. issa of california, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. issa will vote no on passage of the johnson amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. levin: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. stanton, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. stanton will vote yes on the johnson amendment. and as the member designated by mrs. kirkpatrick, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. kirkpatrick will vote yes on the johnson amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. reschenthaler, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. reschenthaler will be voting nay on johnson amendment number 36. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? ms. wexton: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. mceachin, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mceachin will vote yes on the johnson amendment. as the member designated by ms. porter, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. porter will vote yes on the johnson amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from ohio seek recognition? mr. johnson: mr. speaker, as the

member designated by mr. russ fulcher of idaho, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. fulcher will vote nay on the johnson amendment number 36. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from texas seek recognition? ms. garcia: mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. escobar of texas, i inform the house that pursuant to h.res. 8, ms. escobar will vote yes on the johnson amendment. thank you, mr. speaker.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from iowa seek recognition? >> thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by ms. stefanik of new york, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. stefanik will vote no

on the johnson amendment number 36. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. thompson: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. desaulnier, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. desaulnier will vote yes on the johnson amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. torres: as the member designated by ms. strickland, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. strickland will vote yes on the johnson amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from connecticut seek recognition? mrs. hayes: as the member designated by ms. wilson, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrz wilson will -- ms. wilson will vote yes on the johnson amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition? mr. garcia: mr. speaker, as the

member designated by mr. grijalva, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. grijalva will vote yes on the johnson amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. jeffries: as the member designated by chairwoman eddie bernice johnson, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. johnson will vote yea on the johnson amendment. as the member designated by congresswoman meng, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that congresswoman meng will vote yes on the johnson amendment. as the member designated by congressman boyle, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that congressman boyle will vote yes on the johnson amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. payne of new jersey, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. payne

will vote yea on the johnson amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. correa: mr. speaker, as the member designated by congress member napolitano, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress member napolitano will vote yes on the johnson amendment. and mr. speaker, as the member designated by congress member vela, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress member vela will vote no on the johnson amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. evans: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. lawson, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yes on the johnson amendment. thank you.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. mchenry, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mchenry will vote no on the johnson amendment number 36. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? mr. brown: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. defazio of oregon, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. defazio will vote yes on the johnson amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman

from texas seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. babin from the great state of texas, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. babin will vote no on the johnson amendment number 36. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? mr. veasey: as the member designated by mr. swalwell, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. swalwell will vote nay on the johnson amendment. .

teufplt for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? ms. underwood: as the member designated by mr. rush pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. rush will vote yes on the amendment. as the member designated by mr. kim, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. kim will vote yes on the amendment.

is the speaker pro tempore: on this vote, the yeas are 199 --

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote, the yeas 198 and the nays are 231. the amendment is not adopted. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20 the unfinished business is question ol amendment number 38 printed in part c of house report 117-125 offered by mr. garamendi on which further proceedings were postponed and the yeas and naysare ordered. the clerk will redesignate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 38 printed in house report 117-125 offered by mr. tkpwar phepdy of california. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from california. members will record their votes by electronic device by --

[captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] >> as the member designated by mr. mchenry of north carolina, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mchenry will vote no on the amendment. for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr.tonko: as the member designated by representative morelle pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that representative morelle will vote no on the garamendi amendment. and as as the member designated by by representative higgins, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that representative higgins will vote no on the tkpwar phepdy amendment. >> mr. speaker as the member designated by mr. risch environs that willer pursuant to h. res.

8, mr. reschenthaler will be voting no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. thompson: as the member designated by mr. desaulnier, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. desaulnier will vote yes. >> as the member designated by mr. hrat a*f of ohio, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. latta will vote no on the garamendi amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? ms. wexton: as the member designated by mr. mckwraoefpin pursuant to h. res. 8, mr. mceachin will vote no. as the member designated by ms. porter, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. porter will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from iowa seek recognition? >> as the member designated by

ms. stefanik pursuant to h. res. 8, ms. stefanik will vote no on amendment number 8. >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. stanton pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. stanton will vote no on the garamendi amendment. as the member designated by mrs. res. 8, mrs. kirkpatrick will vote no on the garamendi amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from indiana seek recognition? mrs.walorski: as the member designated by mrs. wagner pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. wagner will vote no on amendment number 38.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. torres: as the member designated by ms. strickland, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. strickland will vote no on the garamendi amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from ohio seek recognition? mr. johnson: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. russ fulcher of idaho, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. fulcher will vote nay on amendment number 38. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? mr. cicilline: mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. sewell of alabama, whose state

tree is the long leaf thyme, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. sewell will vote yes on the garamendi amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from texas seek recognition? ms. garcia: mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. escobar, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. escobar will vote yes on the garamendi amendment. thank you, mr. speaker. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. correa: mr. speaker, as the member designated by congress member napolitano, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress member napolitano will vote yes on the garamendi amendment. mr. speaker, as the member designated by congress member vela, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress member vela will vote no on the garamendi amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? mr. veasey: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. swalwell of california, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. swalwell will vote nay on the garamendi amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. payne of new jersey, pursuant to h.res. 8, i

inform the house that mr. payne will vote yes on the garamendi amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? mr. brown: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. defazio of oregon, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. defazio will vote yes on the garamendi amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman seek recognition? mrs. hayes: as the member designated by ms. frankel -- ms. wilson, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. wilson will vote yes on the garamendi amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? mr. kildee: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. ryan of ohio, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. ryan will vote no on the garamendi amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. evans: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. lawson, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that

mr. lawson will vote yes on h.r. 4350. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. jeffries: as the member designated by congresswoman grace meng, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that congresswoman meng will vote yea on the garamendi amendment. as the member designated by chairwoman eddie bernice johnson, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that chairwoman johnson will vote no on the garamendi amendment.

as the member designated by congressman brendan boyle, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that congressman boyle will vote no on the garamendi amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the honorable gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. calvert: thank you. as the member designated by mr. carter of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. carter will vote no on the passage of the garamendi amendment. as the member designated by mr. issa of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. issa will vote no on the passage of the garamendi amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition? mr. garcia: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. grijalva, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. grijalva will vote yes on the garamendi amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. evans: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. lawson, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that

mr. lawson will vote yes on the garamendi amendment. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? is ms. underwood: as the member designated by mr. kim, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. kim will vote yes on the garamendi amendment. as the member designated by mr. rush, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. rush will vote yes on the garamendi amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts seek recognition? ms. clark: as the member designated by ms. frankel, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. frankel will vote no on the garamendi amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. -- as the member designated by mr. babin from the great state of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. babin will vote no on amendment number 38.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does -- for what purpose does the gentleman from south carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. rice of south carolina, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. rice will vote nay on amendment number 38.

the speaker pro tempore: the yeas are 118 and the nays are 299. the amendment is not adopted. pursuant to clause 8, rule 20,

the question is unfinished amendment number 39 printed in house report 117-125 offered by mr. schrader on which further proceedings were postponed and the yeas and nays are ordered the clerk will redesignate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 39 printed in part c of house report 117-125 offered by mr. schrader of oregon. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from oregon. members will record their votes by electronic device [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.]. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. thompson: as the member designated by mr. desaulnier pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. desaulnier will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from south carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. rice pursuant to h. res. 8,

i inform the house that mr. rice will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. defazio of of h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. defazio will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. babin, i inform the house that mr. babin will vote on amendment number 39. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. lawson pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yes on the schrader amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from indiana seek recognition? mrs.walorski: as the member designated by phr-gs wagner of missouri, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. wagner will vote no on the schrader amendment number 39.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from texas seek recognition? ms. garcia: as the member designated by ms. escobar of texas, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. escobar will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from iowa seek recognition? as the member designated by by ms. stefanik of new york pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. stefanik will vote no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr.tonko: as the member designated by mr. morelle pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that representative morelle will vote hi. and as the member designated by mr. higgins, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. higgins will vote aye on the schrader amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman

from ohio seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. russ fulcher of idaho, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. fulcher will vote nay on the schrader amendment, number 39. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from connecticut seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. wilson pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. wilson will vote yes on the

schrader amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. calvert: as the member designated by mr. carter of texas, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. carter will vote no. as the member designated by mr. issa pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. issa will vote no on the schrader amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. stanton pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. stanton will vote no on the schrader amendment. as the member designated by by mrs. kirkpatrick pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. kirkpatrick will vote yes on the schrader amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. mchenry of north carolina, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mchenry will vote no on the schrader

amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? mr. cicilline: as the member designated by of p phr-z sewell, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. sewell will vote yes on the schrader amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. strickland pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. strickland will vote no on the schrader amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? mr. kildee: as the member designated by mr. ryan of ohio, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. ryan will vote yes on the schrader amendment. >> as as the member designated by chairwoman johnson, pursuant to h. res. 8 will vote aye. as the member designated by congresswoman meng pursuant to h. res. 8, ms. meng will vote yes. as the member designated by congressman boyle, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house

that mr. boyle will vote yes on the schrader amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by congress member napolitano pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress member will vote yes on the schrader amendment. as the member designated by congress member villa, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress member villa will vote yes on the schrader amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: as the member designated by mr. payne of new jersey, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. pa*eup will vote yes on the schrader amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts seek recognition? skhrarbg mr. clarke: phegd ms. frankel, i inform the house that ms. frankel will vote yes on the schrader amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? ms. underwood: as the member designated by mr. rush, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. rush will vote yes on the schrader amendment. as the member designated by mr. andy kim, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. kim will vote no on the schrader amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? ms. wexton: as the member designated by mr. mceachin, pursuant to h. res. 8, mr. mceachin will vote no. as the member designated by ms. porter, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. porter will vote yes on the schrader amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose -- for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition?

>> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. grijalva, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. grijalva will vote yes on the schrader amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman -- for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. swalwell, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house

that mr. swalwell will vote yea on the schrader amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by representative reschenthaler, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. reschenthaler will be voting no on schrader amendment number 39. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. latta of ohio, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. latta will vote no on the schrader amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote, the yeas are 167, the nays are 256. the amendment is not adopted. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the question on amendment number 40 printed in part c of house report 117-125, offered by the gentlewoman from new york, ms. ocasio-cortez, on which further proceedings were post uponned, and on which the yeas and nays were ordered. the clerk will redesignate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 40

printed in part c of house report 117-125, offered by ms. ocasio-cortez of new york. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from new york. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. desaulnier, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. desaulnier will vote yes on the ocasio-cortez amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from ohio seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. russ fulcher of idaho, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. fulcher will vote nay on the ocasio-cortez number 40. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by representative morrelle, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that representative morrelle will vote no on the ocasio-cortez

amendment. and as the member designated by representative higgins, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that representative higgins will vote no on the ocasio-cortez amendment. thank you, mr. speaker. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. latta of ohio, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. latta will vote no on the ocasio-cortez amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. grijalva, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. grijalva will vote yes on the ocasio-cortez amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from indiana seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. wagner of missouri, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. wagner will vote nay on the ocasio-cortez amendment number 40. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition?

>> as the member designated by congressman brendan boyle, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congressman boyle will vote nay on the ocasio-cortez amendment. as the member designated by chairwoman eddie bernice johnson, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that chairwoman johnson will vote yea on the ocasio-cortez amendment. as the member designated by congresswoman gris meng, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congresswoman meng will vote yea on the ocasio-cortez moment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by representative reschenthaler of pennsylvania, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. reschenthaler will vote no on the ocasio-cortez amendment number 40. #. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from texas seek recognition? ms. garcia: mr. speaker, as the member designated ms. escobar of texas, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that pursuant to s. res. 8 -- it ms. escobar

is yes on the ocasio-cortez amendment. thank you, mr. speaker. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from iowa seek recognition? mrs. miller-meeks: thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated ms. stefanik of new york, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. stefanik will vote no on the ocasio-cortez amendment number 40. the speaker pro tempore: for

what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. evans: thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated mr. lawson, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote no on ocasio-cortez amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. stanton, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. stanton will vote no on the ocasio-cortez amendment. as the member designated by mrs. kirkpatrick, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. kirkpatrick will vote no on the ocasio-cortez amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. carter of texas, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. carter will vote no on passage of the ocasio-cortez amendment. as the member designated by mr. issa of california, pursuant

to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. issa will vote no on passage of the ocasio-cortez amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. tonko: as the member designated ms. strickland, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. strickland will vote no on the ocasio-cortez amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: mr. speaker, as the member designated mr. payne of inning new jersey, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. payne will vote yea on the ocasio-cortez amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from connecticut seek recognition? mrs. hayes: as the member designated by ms. wilson, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. wilson will vote yes on the ocasio-cortez amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? mrs. miller-meeks -- -- ms. underwood: as the member designated mr. rush, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. rushed will vote yes on the ocasio-cortez. as the member designated representative andy kim, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. kim will vote no on the ocasio-cortez amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member

designated by congress member napolitano pursuant to house resolution 8 i inform the house that congress member napolitano will vote yes on the ocasio-cortez amendment. mr. speaker, as the member designated by congress member vela, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that congress member vela will vote no on the ocasio-cortez amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? mr. cicilline: as the member designated ms. sewell of

alabama, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. sewell will vote no on the ocasio-cortez amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? mr. brown: as the member designated mr. defazio, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. defazio will vote yes on the ocasio-cortez amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> as the member designated mr. swalwell of california, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. swalwell will vote no on the ocasio-cortez amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts seek recognition? ms. clark: as the member designated ms. frankel, pursuant

to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. frankel will vote yes on the ocasio-cortez amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. mchenry of north carolina, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mchenry will vote no on the ocasio-cortez amendment number 40. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek

recognition? ms. wexton: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. mceachin, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mceachin will vote no on the ocasio-cortez amendment. as the member designated by ms. porter, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. porter will vote yes on the ocasio-cortez amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated mr. ryan of ohio, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. ryan will vote no on the ocasio-cortez amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. babin, the great state of texas, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. babin will vote no on amendment number 40.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from south carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. norman of south carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. norman will vote nay on the ocasio-cortez amendment number 40. as the member designated by mr. rice of south carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. rice will vote nay on the ocasio-cortez amendment number 40.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote, the yeas are 86, the nays are 332. the amendment is not adopted. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the question on amendment number 41 printed in part c of house report 117-125 offered by the

gentlewoman from california, msr proceedings were postponed, and on which the yeas and nays were ordered. the clerk will redesignate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 41, printed in part c of house report 117-125, offered by ms. jacobs of california. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from california. members will record their votes by electronic device. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. desaulnier, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. desaulnier will vote yes on the jacobs amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from south carolina seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. norman of south carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. norman will vote nay on the jacobs amendment. mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. rice of south carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. rice will vote nay on the jacobs amendment number 41. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition?

>> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. defazio of oregon, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. defazio will vote yes on the jacobs amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. mchenry of north carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. mchenry will vote no on the jacobs amendment number 41. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by representative higgins, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that representative higgins will vote no on the jacobs amendment. and as the member designated by representative morrelle, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that representative morrelle will vote aye on the jacobs amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. babin of the great state of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform

the house that mr. babin will vote no on the jacobs amendment number 41. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. strickland, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. strickland will vote yes on the jacobs amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. carter of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. carter will vote no on the passage of jacobs amendment. as the member designated by mr. issa of california, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. issa will vote no on passage of the jacobs lee amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from texas seek remember in addition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. escobar of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house

that ms. escobar will vote yes on the jacobs amendment. thank you, mr. speaker. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. mceachin, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. mceachin will vote no on the jacobs amendment. as the member designated by ms. porter, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. porter will vote yes on the jacobs amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from iowa seek recognition? >> thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by ms. stefanik of new york, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. stefanik will vote no on the jacobs amendment number 41.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from connecticut seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. wilson, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. wilson will vote yes on the jacobs amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. stanton, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. stanton will vote no on the jacobs amendment. as the member designated by mrs. kirkpatrick, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. tirk patrick will vote no on the jacobs amendment. -- mrs. kirkpatrick will vote no

on the jacobs amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. grijalva, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. grijalva will vote yes on the jacobs amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek

recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by congress member napolitano, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress member napolitano will vote yes on the jacobs amendment. and mr. speaker, as the member designated by congress member vela, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress member vela will vote no on the jacobs amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from ohio seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. russ fulcher of idaho, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. fulcher will vote no on the jacobs amendment number 41. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. rush, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. rush will vote yes on the jacobs amendment. as the member designated by mr. kim, pursuant to house

resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. kim will vote no on the jacobs amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from indiana seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. wagner of missouri, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. wagner of missouri will vote no on the jacobs amendment number 41. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. frankel, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. frankel will vote yes on the jacobs amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. sewell of alabama, the state -- whose state flower is the oak leaf hydran grveg ea, pursuant to

house resolution 8, i inform the house that -- hydrangea, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. sewell will vote yes on the jacobs amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. ryan of ohio, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. ryan will vote no on the jacobs amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. swalwell of california, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. swalwell will vote no on the jacobs amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. payne of inning new jersey, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. payne will vote yea on the jacobs amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. jeffries: as the member designated chairwoman eddie bernice johnson, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that chairwoman johnson will vote yea on the jacobs amendment. as the member designated congresswoman grace meng, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that congresswoman meng will vote yea on the jacobs amendment. as the member designated by congressman boyle, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that congressman boil will vote yea on the jacobs amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. evans: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. lawson, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yes on the jacobs amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated mr. latta of ohio, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. latta will vote no on the jacobs amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by representative reschenthaler of pennsylvania,

pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. reschenthaler will be voting nay on the jacobs amendment number 41.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 142. the nays are 286. the amendment is not adopted.

prayed, the unfinished business is the question on the amendment 42 printed in part c of house report 117- 7-125 offered by the gentleman from rhode island, mrr proceedings were postponed and on which the yeas and nays are ordered. the clerk will redesignate the am. the clerk: amendment number 42, printed in part c of house report number 117-125, offered by mr. langevin of rhode island. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from rhode island. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.]

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. defazio of oregon, p-rpbt to h. res. 8, mr. defazio will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from indiana seek recognition? mrs.walorski: as the member designated by mrs. wagner, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. wagner votes nay. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr.tonko: as the member designated by representative morelle, i inform the house that representative morelle will vote aye on the langevin amendment. as the member designated by representative higgins pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that representative higgins will vote aye.

>> as the member designated by mr. russ fulcher of idaho, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. fulcher will vote no on the langevin amendment number 42. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. thompson: as the member designated by mr. desaulnier, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. desaulnier will vote yes on the langevin amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from south carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. norman of north carolina i inform the house that mr. norman will vote no. >> as the member designated by mr. stanton pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. stanton will vote yes on the langevin amendment. as the member designated by mrse

house that mrs. kirkpatrick will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. calvert: as the member designated by mr. carter of texas, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. carter will vote no. as the member designated by mr. issa pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. issa will vote no on the langevin amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from texas seek recognition? ms. garcia: as the member designated by ms. escobar of texas, punt to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. escobar will vote yes on the langevin amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. latta of ohio, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. latta will vote no on the langevin amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman

from ride seek recognition? mr. cicilline: as the member designated by ms. sewell and pursuant to house resolution 8, to us that ms. sewell will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from iowa seek recognition? as the member designated by ms. stefanik, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. stefanik will vote no on the amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? as the member designated by mr. reschenthaler, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. reschenthaler will be

voting nay. >> as the member designated by ms. wilson pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. wilson will vote yes on the langevin amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. lawson, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yes on the langevin amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. jeffries: as the member designated by chairwoman johnson pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that chairwoman will vote yes. as the member designated by congresswoman meng, pursuant to h. res. 8, congresswoman will vote yes. as the member designated by congressman boyle, pursuant to

many res 8, i inform the house that congressman boyle will vote yeah. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. swalwell pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. swalwell will vote yeah on the langevin amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. grijalva pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. tkpwreu grijalva will vote yes on the langevin amendment. >> as the member designated by ms. strickland, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. strickland will vote yes on the langevin amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? ms. underwood: as the member designated by mr. kim, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. kim will vote yes on the langevin amendment. as the member designated by mr. rush, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. rush will vote yes. >> pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress member napolitano will vote yes on the langevin

amendment. as the member designated by congress member villa pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congressman villa will vote yes on the langevin amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from massachusetts seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. frankel pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. frankel will vote yes on the langevin amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? mr. kildee: as the member designated by mr. ryan of ohio, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. ryan will vote yes on the langevin amendment. .

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek wreck mission? ms. wexton: madam speaker, as the member designated mr. mceachin, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mceachin will vote yes on the langevin amendment. as the member designated by ms. porter, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. porter will vote yes on the langevin amendment. >> madam speaker, as the member designated mr. mchenry of north carolina, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mchenry will vote no on the langevin amendment number 42.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: madam speaker, as the member designated mr. payne of new jersey, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. payne will vote yea on the langevin amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. babin from the great state of texas, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. babin will vote no on the amendment number 42.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 225. the nays are 187. the amendment is adopted.

pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the question on amendment 105 printed in part c of house report 117-125 offered by the gentleman from new york, mr. bowman, on which further proceedings were postponed and on which the yeas and nays are ordered. the clerk will redesignate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 105, printed in part c of house report number 117-125, offered by mr. bowman of new york. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from new york. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] # for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. . >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. desaulnier, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. desaulnier will vote yes on the bowman amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. babin, the great state of texas, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. babin will vote no on the bowman amendment number 105.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated mr. swalwell, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house 245 that mr. swalwell will vote yea on the bowman amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas -- indiana. for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated mr. mchenry of north carolina, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mchenry will vote no on the amendment 105. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. mceachin, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mceachin will vote yes on the bowman amendment. as the member designated by ms. porter, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. porter will vote yes on the bowman amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from indiana seek recognition? mrs. walorski: as the member designated mrs. wagner of missouri, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. wagner will vote no on the bowman amendment number 105. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated ms. strickland, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. strickland will vote yes on the bowman amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated chairwoman eddie bernice johnson, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that chairwoman johnson will vote yea on the bowman amendment. as the member designated by congresswoman grace meng, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that congresswoman meng will vote yea on the bowman amendment. as the member designated by congressman boyle pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that congressman boyle will vote yea on the bowman amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the -- for what purpose does the gentlewoman from connecticut seek recognition? mrs. hayes: as the member designated by ms. wilson, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. wilson will vote yes on the bowman amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts seek recognition? ms. clark: as the member designated ms. frankel, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. frankel will vote yes on the bowman amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? ms. underwood: as the member designated by mr. rush, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. rush will vote yes on the bowman amendment. as the member designated by mr. kim, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. kim will vote yes on the bowman

amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated mr. reschenthaler of pennsylvania, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. reschenthaler will vote no on the bowman amendment number 105.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. carter of texas, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. carter will vote no on

the bowman-clark amendment. as the member designated by mr. issa of california, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. issa will vote no on passage of the bowman-clark amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek

recognition? mr. evans: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. lawson, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yes on the bowman amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by congress member napolitano pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress member napolitano will vote yes on the bowman amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. stanton pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. stanton will vote yes on the bowman amendment. as the member designated by mrs. res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. kirkpatrick will vote yes on the bowman amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> mr. defazio of oregon,

pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. defazio will vote yes on the bowman amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from texas seek recognition? ms. garcia: as the member designated by ms. escobar of texas, punt to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. escobar is yes on the bowman amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: as the member designated by mr. grijalva, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. grijalva will vote yes on the bowman amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? mr. cicilline: as the member designated by the state with the longest state constitution, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. sewell will vote yes on the bowman amendment. # the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. latta of ohio, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the

house that mr. latta will vote no on the bowman amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr.tonko: as the member designated by representative morelle pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. morelle will vote aye on the bowman amendment.

as the member designated by higgins, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. higgins will vote aye on the bowman amendment. >> as the member designated by mr. russ fulcher of idaho, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. fulcher will vote nay on the bowman amendment number 105.

mr. kildee: as the member designated by mr. ryan of ohio, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. ryan will vote yes on the bowman amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from iowa seek recognition? as the member designated by ms. stefanik pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. stefanik will vote no on

amendment 105.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from south carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. norman of south carolina punt to h. res. 8, mr. norman will vote nay on amendment 105. as the member designated by mr. rice pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. rice will vote aye on amendment 105.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: as the member designated by mr. payne of new jersey, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. payne will vote yes on the bowman amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: the yeas are 234 and the nays are 183. the amendment is adopted. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, unfinished business is question on amendments en bloc printed in part c of house report 117-125 offered by the gentleman from washington, mr. smith, on which further proceedings were postponed and on which the yeas and nays are ordered the clerk will redesignate the amendments en bloc as modified.

the clerk: amendment huh-uh 2, 142, 1243, 145, 147, 148, 150, 151, 152, 152, 156, 158, 159160, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 180, 1 will 1, 184, 185, 1 will 6, 189, 190, 191, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 100, 201, 201, 202, 20 #, 204,

208210, 211, 212, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 228, 229, 230, 231, 233, 234, 235, 236, 238, 239, 242, 243, 245, 246, 247, 250, 250 #, and 253 printed in part c of house report 117-125 offered by mr. smith of

washington. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendments en bloc offered by the gentleman from washington. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.]. ..

number 2. #

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated mr. defazio of oregon, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. defazio will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 2.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman connecticut seek recognition? >> as the member designated ms. wilson, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. wilson will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 2. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman massachusetts seek recognition? ms. clark: as the member designated miss fraik frankel, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. frankel will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 2.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. jeffries: as the member designated by eddie bernice johnson, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that chairwoman johnson will vote yea on amendment s en bloc number 2. as the member designated by congresswoman grace meng, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that congresswoman meng will vote yea on the amendment s en bloc number -- amendment en bloc number 2. as the member designated by congress man brandon boyle, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that congressman boyle will vote yea on amendment en bloc number 2.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition? mr. garcia: as the member designated by mr. grijalva, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. grijalva will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 2.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? mr. nehls: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. babin from the great state of texas, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. babin will vote no on the smith en bloc number 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. meuser: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. reschenthaler, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. reschenthaler will be voting yea on smith en bloc number 2.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. mchenry, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mchenry will vote no on the smith en bloc number 2.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? ms. wexton: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. mceachin, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mceachin will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 2. and as the member designated by ms. porter, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. porter will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 2.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 367 and the nays are 59. the amendment is adopted. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the question on amendments en bloc 3 printed in part c of house report 117-125 offered by the gentleman from washington, mr. smith, on which further proceedings were postponed and on which the yeas and nays were ordered. the clerk will redesignate the amendments en bloc. the clerk: en bloc number 3 consisting of amendments numbered 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259,

260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271 , 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319,

320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364, 365 printed in part c of house report number 117-125 offered by mr. smith of washington. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendments en bloc offered by the gentleman from washington. members will record their votes by electronic device.

[captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? mr. brown: madam chair -- madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. defazio of oregon, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. defazio will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? mr. nehls: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. babin from the great state of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. babin will vote no on the smith en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. thompson: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. desaulnier, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. desaulnier will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? mr. walberg: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. latta of ohio, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. latta will vote yes on en bloc amendment number

3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. torres: as the member designated by ms. strickland, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. strickland will vote on the amendments en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from indiana seek recognition? mrs. walorski: madam speaker, as the member designated by ms. wag nor of -- wagner of missouri, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. wagner will vote yes on the smith en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from connecticut seek recognition? mrs. hayes: as the member designated by ms. wilson, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. wilson will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mchenry, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mchenry will vote yes on the smith en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek

recognition? mr. evans: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. lawson, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yes on en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from ohio seek recognition? mr. johnson: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. russ fulcher of idaho, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. fulcher will vote nay on the smith en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? ms. wexton: as the member designated by mr. mceachin, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mceachin will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 3. and as the member designated by ms. porter, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. porter will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from iowa seek recognition? mrs. miller-meeks: thank you, madam speaker. as the member designated by ms. stefanik of new york, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. stefanik will vote yeah on the -- vote yea on the smith

en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. tonko: madam speaker, as the member designated by representative morrelle, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that representative morrelle will vote aye on the amendments en bloc number 3, and as the member designated by representative higgins, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that representative higgins will vote aye on the amendments en bloc number 3. thank you, madam speaker. .

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by congress member napolitano, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress member napolitano will vote yes on en bloc 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. reschenthaler of pennsylvania, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. reschenthaler will be voting yea on smith en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from texas seek recognition? ms. garcia: madam speaker, as the member designated by

ms. escobar of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. escobar will vote yes on amendment en bloc number 3. thank you, madam speaker. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california -- from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. stanton, sphf sphf tb stanton will vote yes on -- pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. stanton will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 3. and as the member designated by mrs. kirkpatrick, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. kirkpatrick will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mrs. sewell of alabama, birth place of civil rights icon rosa parks, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. sewell will vote yes on

the amendments en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. grijalva, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. grijalva will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by chairwoman eddie bernice johnson, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that chairwoman johnson will vote yea on the amendments en bloc number 3. as the member designated by congresswoman grace meng, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congresswoman meng will vote yea on the amendments en bloc number 3. and as the member designated by congressman brendan boyle, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congressman boyle will vote yea on the amendments en bloc number

3.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. rush, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. rush will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 3. as the member designated by mr. andy kim, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. kim will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. payne of new jersey, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. payne will vote yea on amendments en bloc number 3.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by congressman greg meeks, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congressman meeks will vote yea on the amendments en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek

recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. carter of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. carter will vote yes on passage of en bloc number 3 amendment. as the member designated by mr. issa of california, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. issa will vote yes on the passage of en bloc number 3 amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. swalwell of california, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. swalwell will vote yea on the amendments en bloc number 3. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. ryan of ohio,

pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. ryan will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 3.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. frankel, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. frankel will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 3.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from south carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. rice of south carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. rice will vote aye on amendments en bloc number 2. as the member designated by mr. norton, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. norton will vote nay on

smith en bloc number 3.

the speaker pro tempore: the amendment is adopted. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the question on amendments en bloc

number 4 printed in part b of house report 117-125. offered by the gentleman from washington mr. smith on which further proceedings were postponed and on which the yeas and nays were ordered. the clerk will redesignate the amendments en bloc. the clerk: amendment -- en bloc number 4 consisting of amendments, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380, 381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 39, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 40 #, 404, 405, 40 #,

407, 410, 411, 412, 416, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, # 24, 425, 426, 427, 430, 431, 434, 436, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 45450, 451, 452, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 46 #, 464, 465, 466, 467,

47468, 469, 470471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476 printed in part c of house report 117-125, offered by mr. smith of washington. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendments en bloc offered by the gentleman from washington. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. thompson: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. desaulnier, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. desaulnier will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 4. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from iowa seek recognition? mrs. miller-meeks: as the member designated by ms. stefanik of

new york, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. stefanik will vote yea on the smith en bloc number 4. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from connecticut seek recognition? mrs. hayes: as the member designated by ms. wilson, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. wilson will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 4. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from indiana seek seek recognition? mrs. walorski: madam speaker, as the member designated by mrs. wagner of missouri, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. wagner will vote yes on the smith en bloc number 4. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? mr. brown: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. defazio, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. defazio will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 4. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from south carolina seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. rice, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. rice will vote yes on the en bloc number 4.

as the member designated by -- mr. timmons: as the member designated by mr. norman, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. norman will vote yes on en bloc number 4. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from texas seek recognition? ms. garcia: as the member designated by ms. escobar, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. escobar will vote yes on the en bloc number 4. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from ohio seek recognition? mr. johnson: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. russ fulcher of idaho, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. fulcher will vote nay on the smith en bloc number 4. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. tonko: madam speaker, as the member designated by representative morrelle, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that representative morrelle will be voting aye on the amendments en bloc number 4. and as the member designated by representative higgins, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that representative higgins will vote aye on the amendments en

bloc number 4. thank you, madam speaker. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? mr. cicilline: madam speaker, as the member designated by ms. sewell of alabama, the state in which the first rocket that sent a man to the moon was designed, and pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. sewell will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 4. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> that's a hard act to follow. mr. torres: as the member designated by ms. strickland, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. strickland will vote yes on the en bloc number 4. thank you very much. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition? mr. garcia: as the member designated by mr. grijalva, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. grijalva will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 4. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition?

mr. kildee: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. ryan, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. ryan, the gentleman from youngstown, their favorite son, will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 4. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. levin: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. stanton, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. stanton will be yes on the amendments en bloc number 4. and as the member designated by mrs. kirkpatrick, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. kirkpatrick will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 4. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts seek recognition? ms. clark: as the member designated by ms. frankel, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that ms. frankel will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 4.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? mr. evans: madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. lawson, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yes on the smith en bloc number 4. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? ms. underwood: as the member designated by mr. kim, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. kim will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 4. and as the member designated by mr. rush, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that mr. rush will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 4. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. correa: madam speaker, as the member designated by congress member napolitano, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress

member napolitano will vote yes on en bloc number 4. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. jeffries: as the member designated by chairwoman eddie bernice johnson, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that chairwoman johnson will vote yea on the amendments en bloc number 4. as the member designated by chairman gregory meeks, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that chairman meeks will vote yea on the amendments en bloc number 4. as the member designated by congresswoman grace meng, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that congresswoman meng will vote yea on the amendments en bloc number 4. as the member designated by congressman brendan boyle, pursuant to h.res. 8, i inform the house that congressman boyle will vote yea on the amendments en bloc number 4.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. swalwell of california, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. swalwell will vote yea on the amendments en bloc number 4.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? ms. was swas -- ms. wasserman schultz: as the member designated by mr. payne of new jersey, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. payne will vote yea on amendments en bloc number 4. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek remember in addition? >> as the member designated by mr. carter of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. carter will vote yes on the passage of en bloc amendment number 4. as the member designated by mr. issa of california, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. issa will vote yes on the passage of en bloc number 4 amendment. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition?

>> as the member designated by mr. mchenry of north carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. mchenry will vote yes on the smith en bloc number 4.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. latta of ohio, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. latta will vote yes on en bloc amendment 4.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. mceachin, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. mceachin will vote yes on the amendments en bloc number 4. as the member designated by ms. porter, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. porter will vote yes on amendments en bloc number 4.

the speaker pro tempore: for

what purpose does the gentleman -- for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. babin from the great state of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. babin will vote no on smith en bloc number 4.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. reschenthaler, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. reschenthaler will be voting yea on smith en bloc number 4.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition?

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote, the yeas are 360, the nays are 66. the amendments en bloc are adopted. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the question on amendment 241 printed in part c of house report 117-125, offered by the gentlewoman from new mexico, msh further proceedings were postponed and on which the yeas and nays were ordered. the clerk will redesignate the amendment. the clerk: amendment 241 printed in part c of house 117-125, offered by ms. leger fernandez of new mexico. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from

new mexico. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. desaulnier, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. desaulnier will vote yes on the ledger-fernander fernandez amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. babin of the great state of texas, as the member designated by will vote no on the leger i i inform the house the house that ms. strickland will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from ohio seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. russ fulcher of idaho, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. fulcher will

vote nay on amendment 241. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr.tonko: as the member designated by mr. morelle, pursuant to are helps 8, i inform the house that mr. morelle of the empire state will vote aye. and as the member designated by representative higgins pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that representative higgins will vote aye on the amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. mchenry of north carolina, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. mchenry will vote no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from texas seek recognition? ms. garcia: as the member designated by ms. escobar pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. escobar is a

vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from indiana seek recognition? mrs.walorski: as the member designated by mrs. wagner of missouri pursuant tore h. res. 8, i inform the house that mrs. wagner will vote know on amendment 241.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. stanton pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. stanton will vote yes on the ledger tper fan tkez amendment. as the member designated by mrs. res. 8, mrs. kirkpatrick will vote yes. >> as the member designated by mr. reachen that willer pursuant to h. res. 8, mr. reachen that willer will vote no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? ms. wexton: as the member designated by mr. mceachin pursuant to h. res. 8, mr. mceach win will vote yes. as the member designated by ms. porter, pursuant to h. res.

8, i inform the house that ms. porter will vote yes. >> as the member designated by mr. latta of ohio, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. latta will vote no on the amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? mr. cicilline: as the member designated by ms. sewell the first place to celebrate mardi gras and pursuant to h. res. 8, ms. sewell will vote yes. >> as as the member designated by mr. carter of texas, purpose to h. res. 8, mr. carter will vote no. as the member designated by mr. issa, punter to h. res. 8 will vote no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman

from maryland seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. defazio of oregon, i inform the house that mr. defazio will vote yes on amendment number 241.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. lawson, pursuant to house resolution 78, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yes on amendment 241. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. perlmutter, pursuant to house resolution 8, fuse that mr. perlmutter will vote yes on the amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition?

mr. kildee: as the member designated by mr. ryan of ohio, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. ryan will vote yes on the amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? ms. underwood: as the member designated by mr. kim, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. kim will vote yes. as the member designated by mr. rush pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. rush will vote yes on the amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by congress member napolitano pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress

member he napolitano will vote yes yes on the amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york. mr. jeffries: as the member designated by chairwoman johnson, pursuant to h. res. 8, and pursuant to h. res. 8, chair meeks will votey on the amendment. as the member designated by by congresswoman grace meng, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that congresswoman meng will vote yes.

as the member designated by brand on boyle, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that congressman boyle will vote yeah on the amendment. teufplt for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: as the member designated by mr. payne 6 new jersey, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. pa*eup will vote yes on the amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition did >> as the member designated by mr. grijalva pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. grijalva will vote yes on the amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from iowa seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. stefanik of new york pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. stefanik will vote no on the amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. eric swalwell pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. swalwell kweul vote yes on the amendment.

teufplt for what purpose does the gentlewoman from connecticut seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. wilson pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that ms. wilson will vote yes on the amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. frankel, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. frankel will vote yes on the leger fernandez amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from south carolina seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. rice of south carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. rice will vote nay on the fernandez amendment number 241. madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. norman of south carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. norman will vote nay on the ferpdz amendment number 241.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote, the yeas are 240, the nays are 185. the amendment is adopted. pursuant to clause 8 of rule 20, the unfinished business is the question on the amendment 435 printed in part c of house report 117-125, offered by the gentlewoman from california, mrs. torres, on which further proceedings were postponed, and on which the yeas and nays were ordered. the clerk will redesignate the amendment. the clerk: amendment number 435, printed in part c of house report 117-125, offered by mrs. torres of california. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from california. members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] for what purpose does the gentleman seek recognition? >> as the member designated by

mr. desaulnier, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. desaulnier will vote yes on the torres amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. strickland, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. strickland will vote yes on the torres amendment, torres of california. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from indiana seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mrs. wagner of missouri, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. wagner will vote no on the torres amendment number 435. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from texas seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by ms. escobar of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. escobar will vote yes on the torres amendment. thank you, madam speaker.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by representative higgins, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. higgins of the great state of new york will vote aye on the torres amendment and madam speaker, as the member designated by representative morrelle, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. morelle of the empire state will vote aye on the torres amendment. thank you so much, madam speaker. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. grijalva, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. grijalva will vote yes on the torres amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from connecticut seek recognition? >> as the member designated by

ms. wilson, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. wilson will vote yes on the torres amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. ryan of ohio, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. ryan will vote yes on the torres amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from ohio seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. russ fulcher of idaho, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. fulcher will vote nay on the torres amendment number 435. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. lawson,

pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yes on the amendment 435.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from south carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. rice of south carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. rice will vote nay on amendment 435. as the member designated by mr. norman, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. norman will vote nay on torres amendment 435. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from virginia seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. mceachin, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. mceachin will vote yes on the torres amendment. as the member designated by ms. porter, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. porter will vote yes on the torres amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from iowa seek recognition? >> as the member designated by representative stefanik of new york, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. stefanik will vote no on the torres amendment 435. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by congress member in

napolitano, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress member napolitano will vote yes on the torres amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman

from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. reschenthaler of the great commonwealth of pennsylvania, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. reschenthaler will be voting no on torres amendment 435. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. perlmutter, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. perlmutter will vote yea on the torres amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by ms. sewell of alabama, where it is a class b. felony to wrestle a bear, and pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. sewell will vote yes on the torres amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. frankel, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. frankel will vote yes on the torres amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. carter of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. carter will vote no on passage of the torres amendment. as the member designated by mr. issa of california, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. issa will vote no on passage of the torres, norma, amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. stanton, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. stanton will vote yes on the torres amendment. and as the member designated by mrs. kirkpatrick, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. kirkpatrick will vote yes on the torres amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. kim, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. kim will vote yes on

the torres amendment. as the member designated by mr. rush, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. rush will vote yes on the torres amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? ms. wasserman schultz: as the member designated by mr. payne of new jersey, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. payne will volt yes on the torres amendment. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. defazio of oregon, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. defazio will vote yes on the torres amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? mr. jeffries: as the member designated by chairwoman johnson pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that chairwoman johnson will vote yeah. as the member designated by chair meeks pursuant to h. res. 8, and on the torres amendment. and as the member designated by

brand on boyle, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. boyle will vote yeah on the torres amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. mcheny of north carolina, pursuant to h. res. 8, mr. mchenry will vote no. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek rebg stpheugs?

>> as the member designated by mr. swalwell of california, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that mr. swalwell will vote yes on the torres amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition >> as the member designated by mr. latta of ohio, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. latta will vote no on the amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. babin from texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. babin will vote know the amendment.

the speaker pro tempore: the yeas are 2125 and the nays are

213 and the amendment is adopted. the previous question is ordered on the bill as amended. the question is on environs grossment and third reading of the bill. those in favor say aye those opposed no. the ayes have it. the clerk: h.r. 3450 a bill to authorize for military activities for military construction and personnel strength and for other purposes. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on passage of the bill. those in favor say aye those opposed, no the ayes have it.

for what purpose does the gentleman from -- mr.smith: on that, i request the yeas and nays pursuant to section 3-1-6r7b of 3-8, members will record their votes by electronic device. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc., in cooperation with the united states house of representatives. any use of the closed-captioned coverage of the house proceedings for political or commercial purposes is expressly prohibited by the u.s. house of representatives.] the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from texas seek recognition? ms. garcia: as the member designated by ms. escobar of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. escobar will vote yes on h.r. 4350. thank you, madam speaker, have a great night.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from ohio seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. russ fulcher of idaho, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. fulcher will vote nay on h.r. 4350. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. defazio of oregon, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. defazio will vote yes on h.r. 4350. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from iowa seek recognition? >> thank you, madam speaker. as the member designated by ms. stefanik of new york, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. stefanik will vote nay on h.r. 4350. hall lieuia the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. grijalva, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. grijalva will vote yeah

on h.r. -- will vote yea on h.r. 4350. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. carter of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. carter will vote yes on passage of h.r. 43 r50. as the member designated by mr. issa of california, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. issa will vote yes on the passage of h.r. 4350. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. lawson, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. lawson will vote yes on final passage. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from indiana seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mrs. wagner of missouri, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. wagner will vote yes on h.r. 4350.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. defazio, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. defazio is no on 4350. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. mchenry of north carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. mchenry will vote yes on h.r. 4350. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. desaulnier, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. desaulnier will vote no on h.r. 4350. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. latta of ohio, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. latta will vote yes on h.r.

4350. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. stanton, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. stanton will vote yes on h.r. 4350. as the member designated by mrs. kirkpatrick, pursuant to house

resolution 8, i inform the house that mrs. kirkpatrick will vote yes on h.r. 4350. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by representative reschenthaler of pennsylvania, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. reschenthaler will be voting yea on h.r. 4350. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. strickland, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. strickland will vote yes on h.r. 4350. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. babin from the great state of texas, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. babin will vote no on h.r. 4350.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from connecticut seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. wilson, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. wilson will vote yes on h.r. 4350. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from south carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. rice, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. rice will vote nay on h.r. 4350. as the member designated by mr. norman of south carolina, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. norman will vote nay on h.r. 4350. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. ryan of ohio, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. ryan will vote yes on h.r. 4350.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by representative morrelle, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that representative morrelle will vote aye on h.r. 4350. and madam speaker, as the member designated by representative higgins, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that representative higgins will vote aye on h.r. 4350. thank you, madam speaker. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from rhode island seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by ms. sewell of alabama, the birth place of civil rights icon and our late colleague john lewis, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. sewell will volt yes on h.r. 4350.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. perlmutter, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. perlmutter will vote yea on h.r. 4350. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from illinois seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. andy kim, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. kim will vote yes on h.r. 4350. as the member designated by mr. rush, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. rush will vote yes on

h.r. 4350. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by congress member napolitano, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congress member napolitano will vote yes on h.r. 4350. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from massachusetts seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by ms. frankel, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. frankel will vote yes on h.r. 4350. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. payne of new jersey, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. payne will vote yea on h.r. 4350.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. mceachin, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. mceachin will vote yes on h.r. 4350. as the member designated by ms. porter, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. porter will vote yes on h.r. 4350. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by chairwoman eddie bernice johnson, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that chairwoman johnson will vote yea on h.r. 4350. as the member designated by chairman gregory meeks, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that chairman meeks will vote yea on h.r. 43506789 as the member designated by congresswoman grace meng, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congresswoman meng will vote yea on h.r. 4350.

as the member designated by congressman brendan boyle, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that congressman boyle will vote yea on h.r. 4350. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. swalwell of california, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that mr. swalwell will vote yea on h.r. 4350.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> as the member designated by congresswoman grace meng, pursuant to h. res. 8, i inform the house that congresswoman meng will vote no on h.r. 4350.

the speaker pro tempore: on this vote the yeas are 316. the nays are 113. the bill is passed. without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid upon the table. without objection, the title is amended.

for what purpose does the gentleman from washington seek recognition? >> madam speaker, i ask unanimous consent that the clerk be authorized to make technical corrections in the engrossment of h.r. 4350 including spellings, title memberring, cross-referencing, conforming the amendments to the table of contents and short titles and assertion of appropriate headings. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, so ordered. the chair will now entertain requests fundraise one-minute speeches. for what purpose does the gentlewoman from new mexico seek recognition? >> madam speaker, i stand today in support of the women's health protect -- protection act. madam speaker, new mexico is a

border state with texas. because of the draconian texas abortion ban, texas women are driving hours to receive reproductive health care in new mexico. ms. leger fernandez: we are receiving women's rights refugees. our texas sisters, we are receiving them with open arms, hearts and clinics, new mexico knows a woman's freedom to make difficult health decisions belongs to her alone. in contrast, texas politicians deputize complete strangers to interfere with her health choices. texas abortion ban falls most heavily on minority, lgbtq and low-income communities who can't afford to travel or access quality health care. i trust in the wisdom of my house colleagues who in passing the women's health protection act are standing with the women of this country in every state. i yield back.

the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from georgia seek recognition? mr. carter: ask unanimous consent to address the house for one minute. revise and extend my remarks. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentleman is recognized. mr. carter: madam speaker, i rise today with a heavy heart to remember and honor ann of savannah, georgia, who sadly passed away on september 15 at the age of 91. she devoted her life to serving her community and the state of georgia. after graduating from the university of georgia in 1951, she began an impactful career as a state representative where she served for 20 years. beyond her service as a state representative, she was actively involved in improving the savannah community. as a board member of the savannah chatham humane society and cultural affairs commission, she touched countless lives. her passion for others is remarkable and i know her impact will never be forgotten. her irreplaceable presence will be missed by all. i am honored to rise today to

remember ann and her lifetime of service to her community. my thoughts and prayers are with her family, friends, and all who knew her during this most difficult time. thank you, madam speaker. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: under the speaker's announced policy of january 4, 2021, the gentleman from texas, mr. roy, is recognized until 10 p.m. as the designee of the minority leader. mr. roy: thank you, madam speaker.

while the members of the united states congress exit the chamber as they often do after whatever the majority deems appropriate to have on the floor of the house, which there is obviously the important national defense authorization act, nevertheless my home state of texas the people of texas are under siege with wide open borders. so right now as we have members of congress, all 400-something of my colleagues who just left the chamber, they are going off now to go have a steak dinner, a glass of wine, go hang out with some of their colleagues, meet up with some folks here in the district of columbia. some 15 mund or -- 1500 or maybe

more miles away in texas we have a state and a people who are dealing with the consequences of an administration that fails to faithfully execute the laws of the united states and leaves texas wide open to be harmed, endangered, and nobody in this body on the other side of the aisle seems to care. in the slightest bit. i went down to south texas a couple weeks ago with my friend, senator ted cruz, met with rarchers, met with leaders and rarchers and law enforcement. met with the leaders of webb county in laredo texas. mcallen, texas. all places that president joe biden has never seemingly been to in his 50 years of public

service. certainly hasn't been there since he's been president. vice president of the united states is allegedly in charge of the border, hasn't found her way to any of these places that i visited a mere two weeks ago. the vast majority of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle have found their way, of course, one of my colleagues, the gentlelady from new york, couple years ago, somewhat famously found her way down to the border to decry, quote, kids in cages. where is that colleague today? wearing perhaps an all white outfit with red letters on it. where's the concern for the little girls whose legs have been branded, burned by cartels? where's the concern for the 89 dead migrants, bodies found in

brooks county, texas. 89. where's the concern? my colleagues on the other side of the aisle like to go around talking about how compassionate they are for those seeking to come to the united states. they suggest that those of us who believe the border should be secured don't want brown people in the united states. that's what they not only imply, that's basically what they say. meanwhile, there's a hell of a lot of brown people in south, texas who are getting ticked off at an administration who refuse to secure the border while their families are in danger. there is a whole lot of brown people who work for the border patrol feeling pretty darn unappreciated right now. when the white house press secretary lies to the american people. the white house press secretary

lies on a daily basis to the american people. lie number one, perpetuating the lie that border patrol was whipping migrants. it's a lie. it's being repeated by my clootion on the other side of the aisle. it is a lie. the president of the united states and those in charge of the press secretary are countensing this lie about border patrol. this picture i'm standing next to is a picture of border patrol, one of their horses, interacting with a young man who is, of course, a young boy, i should say, one of the migrants from haiti who is down in del rio. young fellow is having a good time. down with this border patrol agent on his knees. this border patrol agent is a

man. probably with a family. i don't know how old he s i know a lot of border patrol agents because i actually go there. i don't just dismiss border patrol agents as some sort of callous individuals who don't care about human beings. that's what my colleagues on the other side of the aisle do every single day. led by the president of the united states with a voice from a press secretary who lies every single day about the state of our border. . and then today has the audacity to take away horses, at least in the del rio sector. i haven't been able to look at the entire order. take away horses from the border patrol to actually try to patrol the border. this coming from people that haven't gone to the dang gum border. there are no navigable roads along the border.

my democratic colleagues don't care. my democrat colleagues don't care that border patrol can't run along the river. you think at least in their politically correct nonsense they espouse every day they would not have to use automobiles. that maybe they can use horses to go down to the river. not one of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle goes down and meets with the ranchers, the border patrol agents who are dealing with the actual outcome, the actual result of an administrative policy to leave our borders wide open. in the state of texas, the department of public safety has caught over 400 pounds of fentanyl this year compared to 10 pounds last year. dead texans. dead texans as the direct result of this administration's refusal, flat-out refusal to

faithfully execute the laws of the united states. a sweet and low pact of fentanyl in pure form would kill every member of this body. 10,000 pounds of fentanyl have been intercepted this year. more than the last three years combined. where are my democratic colleagues? i asked this question when i was in laredo when i was sitting next to the hispanic county judge in webb county, the chief administrator of the county. i asked, where is joe biden? when he got up to the podium next he said, that is a great question. where is joe biden? well, if joe biden knows where he is, it would be helpful. he sure as heck not down on the border. he's sure as heck not down in laredo. and his policies are abandoning

the people of laredo and abandoning the people of texas. the policies of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle leave texas dealing with the brunt of a wide-open border. and they laugh it off. they ignore it. the stash houses in houston, texas, the stash houses in del rio, the stash houses in laredo, the stash houses in mcallen, the stash houses up and down the border where little girls and little boys are being put in the sex trafficking trade, my democratic colleagues who pat themselves on the back for being compassionate are nowhere to be found, m.i.a. joe biden nowhere to be found while people die, while people die from opioid overdose. almost 100,000 this year in the united states. when the cocaine problem was a big deal in the 1980's, we were talking about 10,000. now we're talking about 100,000. just where in the world are my colleagues on the other side of

the aisle? i tell you where they are. they're running around preaching about masks and telling the people of texas that small businesses in texas must force vaccinate texans if they got more than 100 employees. that is literally not in the constitution and it's fully unconstitutional, unlawful. and i very strongly encourage the people of texas to look at the president of the united states and tell him to pound sand. do not follow that order. do not accept it as legitimate. it is not. and this is a theme that the people of texas are going to have to come to grips with more and more. that when the president of the united states, impeachably refuses to execute the laws of the united states, it's

incumbent upon a free people in a sovereign state to come up with the way they believe are important to defend their borders, secure their citizenry, and take action, irrespective of the orders of a president who fails to faithfully execute the laws of the united states. i do not make those statements lightly. because those statements mean something. but we're under assault in texas, and this administration does not care and, worse yet, this administration is taking specific action and specific inaction to purposely create the situation that we are having to deal with on the front lines in texas. purposely reducing the enforcement of title 42, which enables us to turn people away at the border during a public

health emergency pandemic environment where you can have communicable diseases like we're dealing with now. purposely not using the return to mexico program, the migrant protection protocols that works with mexico to stem the tide. last year we had a few hundred thousand people that we were apprehending at the border. today, this year, we have 1.4 million. and year's not over yet. we will be well over 1 1/2, 1.6 million people this fiscal year. think about that. 208,000 in august. 212,000 in july. before the haitians arrived in del rio. and by the way, if we're talking about the haitians, none of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle seem to care that along the rio grande are driver's licenses from chile,

passports from brazil, because the people from haiti who came to del rio weren't coming directly from haiti. we know this. they were in south america. and then they got word because word is spreading around the globe, ladies and gentlemen, word is spreading around the globe that this administration says, come to the united states, claim asylum, and walk right in. now, the problem with that is it's the least compassionate thing you can do. you endanger them on the journey. you endanger through the process where cartels can abuse them. you harm the countries that they're leaving from through the drain of their resources -- labor, brain drain -- and you endanger the american people when you have a flood of migrants coming in to a state that then has to deal with it.

would any of my democratic colleagues know what to do for the most part if i airdropped them in to south texas on a 5,000-acre ranch and they had to walk through the scrub brush of south texas, running across a rattlesnake and they go find a migrant out there dying from dehydration? the vast majority of my latte sipping, new york living, condo living colleagues on the other side of the aisle wouldn't have a daggum clue what to do. but i can tell you my texan, constituents and friends in south texas are figuring out what to do with human beings on their ranches. would anyone want to deal with the 89 dead bodies in brooks county? do they. do they know what to do when

they walk up to a body that's ate up by vul chers because a human being died on a ranch? this is a hard conversation on the other side of the aisle when hundreds of human beings are dying in the hot texas sun and county judges have to spend $3,000 per autopsy, $5,000 each to then bury them. they're trying to figure out how to handle their budget when they have covid cases exploding. oh, no, my colleagues on the other side of the aisle start talking about, oh, horses. race baiting defines the party of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle. it's the entire existence of the party of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle that they would take a situation that a democratic president has

created purposefully and then dare to turn it into a race-focused situation. i would like any of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle to stand and look in the eyes of the 70% of border patrol who are hispanic and tell them that they are racist. because that's what they do. my colleagues on the other side of the aisle, they go on tv and they say they're racist. al sharpton flies down to go have a press conference in del rio, texas. bringing out the race card. maxine waters wants to compare border patrol agents using horses to deal with a wide open border and a chaos created by this administration to slavery. it's absolutely abhorrent.

it is embarrassing, and the people of texas are up to here with a union that is not all that united around the principles upon which we were founded and that are showing precious little deference to the people of my state. they are fed up. there is a tender box, and my colleagues on the other side of the aisle ignore it at the peril of the future of this republic. this is a big deal what's happening. the nine migrants that were in an automobile in bernie, texas, two in the trunk, an american

citizen driving that car who was employed by the cartel heading to a stash house in houston. young man paid $4,000 to go pick grapes in california. had a rude wake-up call he was heading to a stash house. fortunately, law enforcement intercepted them. this is happening every single day in our state. we know this because we go down and we look. senator cruz and i go down to laredo. we go sit at a checkpoint. i didn't see any of my democratic colleagues there. with the notable exception, my friend, henry cuellar, who's probably the lone democrat who actually acknowledges the crisis that we have along our southern border. and we watch these trucks go through scanners. one out of 10 trucks. then, we go down to the river

and there are 33 migrants coming across the river and we're watching them across the river and they come out and swim and come back and play cat and mouse. then, we get a scan on our phone from one of the scans that came through right after we left the checkpoint with a truck full of 29 migrants in the back. every day this is happening. and these people are endangered. but my democrat colleagues don't care. because of the crass cynicism of electoral politics. that's what this is about. the good news is is the great hispanic texans of south texas have had enough. sapata county went republican for the first time since 1920. when i drove through there just two weeks ago i stopped because

i noticed a flag flying that had a certain color metaphor associated with the president that i won't, of course, repeat here on the floor of the house of representatives. it may or may not be in line with a chant that's been often used in a number of settings around our country lately. in zapata county, in mcallen, a republican mayor was recently elected. the fact is when people are ignored, when people are endangered, when people are taken for granted, as hispanic americans every single day and hispanic texans in particular are experiencing every single day, they tend to take that seriously. they tend to recognize that an administration that gives lip service to caring for them but

lets them die and lets their businesses implode and lets their ranches get run over and lets narcotics flown into their community at will, all in the false name of compassion and pretending that one cares about somebody because of the color of their skin, they tend to take offense to that and believe that maybe there should be a better way. . when i talk to people in texas, they ask quite frequently what precisely are we getting out of this deal? what does union even mean anymore? what precisely is united about

the united states? how can one say that we have united states? when the president of the united states dictates unlawfully to a people that they must forcefully vaccinate their employees and then thousands of those employees say, hey, i don't want to do that because i have natural immunity, and science seems to show that natural immunity may be as strong or stronger than that that comes from a vaccine. they tend to tabling offense -- tend to take offense. they tend to want to tell the authoritarian to pound sand. when the president of the united states threw his h.h.s. secretary walks in and says, i'm sorry, texas, i'm sorry, flad, we are going to cut your mono

clonal wasn't -- antibody treatments in half. limit your ability to get care. we are going to try to run a campaign against certain medicines that might actually provide care for your loved ones, and we are going to do so out of some sort of fealty to bureaucrats and c.d.c. and n.i.h., and namely dr. fauci, the people who are then relegated to the corner trying to figure out how to care for themselves when a cronyistic health care system run by bureaucrats and government and bureaucrats and an insurance industry that is, frankly, corrupt, a health care system run by corporations in bed with government bureaucrats getting taxpayer funds to enrich them and leaving small businesses and individuals in this country, texans i represent, holding the bag while the president of the united states limits their

ability to get health care. then mandates they get a vaccine. and then goes off to parties like my colleagues on the other side of the aisle tend to do, maskless, while preaching wearing masks. because it's all theater. it's all a show except that it's very real and it's very focused on accruing power in washington, d.c. in -- my warning to my colleagues is this. americans tend to take that sort of thing seriously. and while we watch people in australia, and we watch people in paris, and we watch people in canada, even, we watch people around the globe resisting the tyranny of government, the united states is filled with people who similarly are

predisposed to want to resist the power of the federal government and they tend to take it very seriously. my warning to my colleagues is that if this body, the people's house, expects for this country to be united, that it means to darn well act like it and stop trying to force the will of a federal government against the constitutional framework that we agreed to over the people of the state that i represent. because the people of the state that i represent are not going to sit back and let that happen. this is where we are. this is the question of our day. are we going to agree to disagree and live peaceably together or are we going to force tensions and force conflict which this democrat-led

government in the executive branch and legislative branch is hellbent on doing? and forcing the people that i represent to have to start asking questions about what we are going to do to preserve freedom for our children and grandchildren. to go to the doctor of our choice. to go to the school of our choice. to not have our children be indoctrinated with critical race theory, dangerous principles of race baiting. teaching our kids that america is evil. restricting the ability of our people to go to the doctor because they have to go to a bureaucrat to get permission before they get health care. trying to restrict the ability of the american people to arm themselves while -- leaving our border wide open and defunding our police, and then daring the question why we want to be armed. that is how the people of texas are viewing the assault on their constitutional rights and the structure of government that was

designed to protect liberty and allow us to agree to disagree. but my colleagues on the other side of the aisle refuse on a daily basis to allow us to agree to disagree. and that is a dangerous position by my colleagues on the other side of the aisle. it is a dangerous position by this president. it is a dangerous position by the administration. because there is going to be a lot of people in at least the state i represent, i speculate a lot more, who are not going to sit by and allow a federal government to run amuck over their liberties and to tell them how to live their lives. we are not going to sit back and allow cartels to run over our border. to have drugs pour into our communities. have crimes committed on our streets. to have migrants dying on our ranches. fences cut, livestock loose. children in the sex trafficking trade.

while my democrat colleagues march down to del rio and cry racism. because it's the only card they can ever pull out of an empty deck. a deck not committed to the principles upon which this nation was founded or the flag that sits above the dais, but rather a dedication to a leftist socialist marxist way of thinking and belief in the all power, all knowing of the authority of those in government to tell the people what to do. that is not the way the american people view their position in a government whose constitution starts with three words, we, the people. we have abandoned those first three words, we, the people.

and the power of this government is built upon a foundation of the power coming from we, the people. and those bill of rights that in there to protect the people from the power of government. we are abandoning those on a daily basis. i am amazed at the extent to which my colleagues on this side of the aisle, quite frankly, are just too-shall all too often able to just go give a speech, go get on a news show, put out a press statement about how bad the border is. and then, let's move on to the next issue. move on to the next topic. when all these headlines about the haitians in del rio subside, where will everybody be? will my colleagues even on my side of the aisle wake up every day like we do dealing with this in texas and understand what's

happening? under stand how bad a fentanyl epidemic is in this country. do the people in this body have the first clue that it is our policies that are enabling china to use cartels to exploit an open border to kill americans? and do they care? not in the slightest bit. then i watch my colleagues on both sides of the aisle, frankly, today we spent all day, almost 12 hours now, i guess probably eight hours, offering amendments to the ndaa. not one of those amendments that

we voted on today, not one, allowed us to address and debate here on the floor of the house of representatives the drafting of our daughters. the drafting of our mothers. the drafting of our sisters. the drafting of our wives. not one amendment today was allowed by democrat tyranny in the rules committee to allow us to have a substantive debate on the floor of the house of representatives about an issue as important as having the united states government conscript women. can you imagine that? can you imagine a body that is called the people's house having an environment in which we pass legislation as part of an $800 billion defense authorization

bill that had some 400 amendments, we didn't even debate on the floor of this house, we didn't even debate the drafting of women. more than half of my colleagues on this side of the aisle said, oh, sure. why not. why? because they sit there and they say, well, don't worry. the draft will never occur. well, don't worry, if the draft does occur, it will be because we have some real bad conflict with somebody like china. which is it? you got to have the draft in order to deal with the bad conflict of china? there will never be a draft. if there is it will be a bad conflict with china. trust us, don't worry, your daughter won't be drafted into combat. really? trust us? in what universe should i trust the government of the united

states? why would i do that? the same government that just abandoned allies, abandoned americans, abandoned s.i.v.'s in afghanistan, left $85 billion of equipment for the taliban to have. walked away from rare earth minerals? the same government that is completely ignoring their duty to enforce the borders? knowingly? when they have a mechanism to secure and enforce our borders. the same government when the president's own press secretary is lying on a daily basis through her teeth? about supposedly horses whipping human beings? certainly debunked. is that the same government i'm supposed to trust not to draft

my 10-year-old daughter when she became 18? and is forced by the power of government to register for selective service? who are we as a people? what happened to us? are we such a cold robotic people that we can't have an actual debate and discussion about the reality of life? is that who we are? the same doctor with a cold stare who looked at my dear friend and told her she should abort her little boy because of a brain scan that went a little amuck and she was coming up on the term which you can do that in the commonwealth of virginia. she chose life. and now her son is my godson. he's a healthy little boy. the same coldness with which that doctor looked at my friend and said, you should abort, in front of her two other boys with

her husband not there? is that what we have become? such a cold country, such a callous country? that we just blindly say that in the false name of equality or equity or whatever the word of choice is of the day that we must draft our daughters? let me be clear. over my dead body will you draft my daughter. i mean that. literally. over my dead body will you draft my daughter. yet that is precisely what happened today with no debate, no amendment allowed, and my colleagues on both sides of the aisle i'm particularly ashamed of my colleagues on this side of the aisle, for whispering in closed doors well i would have

voted against that if we had it on the floor. i tried to pose it in committee. it's the nd tavment a, we just got to support the nd tavment a. we have pay raises for troops. never mind all the other garbage in the bill. we have to support it. 60 straight years. we have to support it. you want to know why the department of defense is a mess? you want to know why the brass is completely inept and unable to actually run a war? unable to actually exit a country when a president gives a ridiculous order to exit on september 11 for optics? . because we have been funding it for decades and my colleagues on this side of the aisle are guilty, if not more. and now my colleagues on this side of the aisle say, sure, draft my daughters.

and when i say, as i have said to them, that a vote for this ndaa today was a vote to conscript your daughters, let me tell each and every one of you across this country, that is precisely what it was. and do not let any member of this body get away with hiding or running from the simple fact that today, this body voted to conscript our daughters. imagine that one day when you're sitting in your house and the lottery number comes up for your wife and not for you, what are you going to do? or for your daughter and not you? what are you going to do?

the president of the united states has in multiple regards engaged in what i believe to be impeachable conduct. the president of the united states has failed to faithfully execute the laws of the united states. left our borders wide open. endangered our people. endangered the people of my state. the president of the united states has failed to carry out his duty to defend the united states abroad. has in fact aided and abetted the enemy by leaving billions of dollars of equipment for our enemies to use against us. leaving americans behind. leaving allies behind. and the president of the united states has abused the power of his office to step over the bounds of the constitution to order people, order people to

force their employees to get vaccinated. when he has no such authority. he has no such authority. and he knows it. he knows it. for the exact same reason that the president of the united states admitted that he didn't have the power to extend the eviction moratorium. he flat out admitted it and said he was only going to do it until such time as the courts could hear the case and make a decision. that same president knows full way that his orders are unconstitutional but he does not care and that is an abuse of power. that same president knows that the borders are being exploited and wide open and the cartels are endangering the american people and the migrants who seek

to come here and he does not care and that's faithless execution of the laws. the president of the united states knows full well. heck, my 12-year-old son knows full well as he said as we were driving around, dad, why would you leave the equipment there for the bad guys to get? well, son, maybe you should be an advisor to the president of the united states, because he doesn't seem to understand that concept. and neither does the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. and neither does the secretary of defense. because they are so focused on chief diversity officers and woke policies and critical race theory that they don't give a rat's rear end for defending the united states of america. the same reason that the colleagues have gone down to the river and to the border playing the race card and chanting racism and comparing border patrol agents to slaveholders. and where's the secretary of homeland security?

defending the people that work for him and border patrol while they're outmanned, exhausted, resigning because they're not being given what they need and support from the top leaders of the homeland security. secretary mayorkas has the experience to know full well that abandoning title 42 and abandoning m.p.p., the migrant protection protocols, he knows full well that that endangers the people of this country and he does not care. he's leaving the people of south texas exposed. he's leaving the ranchers who work there endangered with fences cut down and ranchers having to figure out how to protect their families and ranchers sending their children out across the ranches armed to defend themselves. ranchers finding dead bodies on ranches. the dead bodies of migrants.

hundreds of them. that is faithless execution of the laws. that is why the secretary of homeland security is acting with impeachable conduct. the american people are getting sick of this. the people of texas are getting sick of this. and my admonition to my colleagues on the other side of the aisle is be very careful of walking this perilous journey of authoritarian actions by a president, an authoritarian action by the legislating of a congress that's ignoring our constitutional framework, ignoring federalism, ignoring separation of powers, ignoring their duties under the constitution, and endangering the people i represent on a

daily basis because that will not turn out well. the people of texas are not going to simply sit back and take it. the governor of texas has been deploying department of public safety personnel to del rio. we have more d.p.s. people in del rio than border patrol. we have more assets, more aerial activity. and but for the actions of the governor of the state of texas moving d.p.s. down to del rio, the crisis would have truly exploded. but that's only a step. the governor and the state of texas and the $3 billion that the texas legislature appropriated and are deploying

and the d.p.s. are down there and arresting bad actors and arresting people for trespass. the state of texas is going to have to go further. because the federal government is refusing to do its job. and at some point, the state of texas is going to force a constitutional showdown. because it will be incumbent upon the people of texas to do so. it will be incumbent upon the people of texas to tell the rest of the country to get out of our daggum way so we can defend the people of our state. that's where we are. and while my colleagues decry the fact that texans believe we should protect life once it has a heartbeat, while my colleagues decry the fact we should protect life, while my colleagues allow migrants to die, texans want to

simply keep their communities safe. and texans are going to do so. the people's house is supposed to mean something, madam speaker. the people's house is supposed to be a place where we're able to come together, agree under the constitution on how to have a more perfect union. but union doesn't mean anything when the people of my state is being trampled -- are being trampled. union doesn't mean anything when the rights of the people i represent are not being respected, when the safety of the people i represent is not being protected or secured. when the blessings of liberty

that are supposed to be secured under the constitution are not being secured but being trampled upon, then it will beg questions about the efficacy of union. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the member yields back. members are reminded to refrain from engaging in personalities towards the president. pursuant to section 11-b of house resolution 188, the house stands adjourned until 9:00 a.m. tomo the vote was 316-113. the legislation goes to the senate. $1 billion for the air defense system known as iron dome. we expect work on a did -- bill restricting abortion providers. debate may start on the infra structure built next week.

for live health coverage friday at 9 a.m. eastern on c-span. c-span is your unfiltered view of government. we are funded by these television companies and more including wow. > the> world has changed. the fast internet connection is something no one can live without. wow is there for customers with speed, reliability, value, and choice. more than ever, it starts with great internet. wow. >> wow supports c-span as a public service along with these other television providers, giving you a front receipt to democracy. a number of violent incidents involving passengers on airplanes has increased. witnesses share their stories about disruptions by unruly airline passengers and pointed to several contributive factors includinco