keep up with the biggest events livestreamed proceedings, white house events, the court room, campaigns and more for the world of politics all on your fingertips. stay current with the latest episodes of washington journal and find scheduling information for c-span's tv networks and radio. c-span now is available at the apple store and google play. c-span now, your front row seat to washington anytime, anywhere. host: good morning. this is "washington journal" for july 24. a recent poll found those that have been watching the january 6 committee hearings only 6% have changed their mind on the events

of the day. for the next hour we want to hear from you. have you been watching the hearings? and has anything you watched or heard changed your mind about january 6? democrats can call at (202)-748-8000. republicans dial (202)-748-8001. independents, (202)-748-8002 and you can text us at (202)-748-8003 but include your name and city. you can also send a tweet or find us on instagram @cspanwj and facebook.com/c-span. let's start by talking about the monmouth university poll. it was taken earlier in the hearings before the most explosive hearings, for example,

the cassidy hutchinson hearing. but of those that have been watching the initial hearings only 6% changed their mind. it said about one in 10 republicans have changed their mind. the same poll asked what people think about american democracy in general. the number of people who thinks the american system is sound has also decreased since the last time the poll was taken. but when it comes to watching the hearing it found 6% overall. we also have another poll that came out recently. the majority of people think former president trump was

somewhat responsible for what happened january 6, but they do not believe he will be charged. 57% of americans up from 53% in january said he deserves at least a good amount of the blame for what happened at the u.s. capitol. half of them think he should be charged with crimes but only 28% of u.s. adults think he will face criminal charges. most republicans, but even 45%, do not think former president trump should be charged. we want to hear from you and we go to the phone lines in just a second. i wanted to bring up this morning's "washington post." in an article that says,

refusing to accept he lost. trump set u.s. on path to january 6 and it includes this chart. the chart is labeled, the 15 times trump chose to escalate efforts, according to the committee's evidence. it starts with aides saying, bearing bad news. they told trump he lost the election but the former president would not accept the conclusion, even from his attorney general. it goes into the fake electors, the wild tweet about january 6 and other examples. 15 times the former president shows to escalate efforts to overturn the election. that is according to the january

6 committee. let's go to the phone lines. we want to hear from you about whether you have been watching the hearings and whether anything you seen has change your mind. we are going to hear from herbert in woodford, virginia on the democratic line. good morning. what do you think? caller: his daughter was trying to coach him. i wanted the republicans to see -- they always talk about joe biden stumbling over speeches. i would like them to see that video. i would appreciate if you showed it. host: thank you, herbert.

thomas on the independent line calling from deerwood, maryland. caller: good morning. i watched it from beginning to end. it is clear criminal charges should be brought against donald trump. it is clear the republicans are watching it but when you put them in front of a microphone, they state they do not watch it. that is clearly a lie like donald trump was telling lies. the republicans are still telling lies. donald trump came into this election, to me, as a segregationist. he tried to choose people around him that were segregationist. they tried to call him racist but he is really a segregationist.

and he is a crook. host: thank you, thomas. michael in ashburn, virginia on the republican line. caller: good morning. host: good morning. caller: i watched it. i am not surprised 6% have changed their mind. it has been a pretty one-sided thing. i am not surprised. host: these are some remarks from liz cheney. she is the vice chair of the committee. she has given her opening remarks and we are going to hear from her now. [video clip] >> in our initial hearing, the chairman and i described what became donald trump's seven part plan to overturn the 2020

election. a plan stretching from before election day to january 6. at the close of today's hearings we will have addressed each element of that plan. but in the course of these hearings we have received new evidence and new witnesses have bravely stepped forward. efforts to overcome immunity and executive privilege claims have been successful and those continue. doors have opened, new subpoenas have been issued, and the dam has begun to break. even as we conduct our ninth hearing we have considerably more to do. we have far more evidence to share with the american people and more to gather. our committee will spend august pursuing emerging information on multiple fronts before convening further hearings the september. today we know far more about the

president's plans and actions to overturn the elections that almost all members of congress did when president trump was impeached january 13, 2021 or when he was tried by the senate in february of that year. the senators voted to convict president trump and 20 others said they were voting against conviction because the president's term had already expired. the republican leader of the senate said this. >> a mob was assaulting a capitol in his name. these criminals were carrying his banners, hanging his flags and screaming their loyalty to him. it was obvious that only

president trump could end this. he was the only one. >> leader mcconnell reached those conclusions based on what he knew, without the detailed evidence you will see today. host: that was representative liz cheney, the vice chairwoman of the house select committee investigating january 6. we want to hear from you about whether you have been watching the hearings and if anything you have seen have changed your mind about the events of the day. democrats can call at (202)-748-8000. republicans dial (202)-748-8001. independents, the number is (202)-748-8003. you can also text us at -- independents is (202)-748-8002

and you can text us at (202)-748-8003. please include your name and city. you can also send a tweet @csp anwj, on instagram @cspanwj and facebook.com /c-span. we are going to go back to the phone lines to jacqueline. caller: although i am calling on the democratic line i do not see this as an independent or democratic issue. when you have done what donald trump did as president, i don't care who it is, it is wrong. he needs to be held accountable and so do the congressmen who

are sitting in those seats at the capitol. they need to be held accountable also because this is about democracy, and it cannot survive with all of this deceit and lies, scheming and division. that's all i have to say. host: next we are going to hear from bubba in memphis, tennessee. caller: good morning. this is for the dude in maryland that called all republicans liars. i have not watched one minute of the hearings other than what i have seen on the newscast. i do not care nothing about it because it is a kangaroo court. it is a one-sided deal. they have been after trump since

day one. they were supposed to have all this evidence that trump did this. it is a one-sided deal. they need to question pelosi, find out what she knew, when she knew it. they said they were going to peacefully march and let their voices get heard. schumer told brett he did not know what was going to hit him when brett almost got killed. it is a democratic witchhunt to get trump where he cannot run again. he is going to be the next president and he has to get this country in shape like it was before the old dude got in. he don't even know what day it is. the country is going to hell

with him in charge. host: next is lydia in new orleans on the democratic line. caller: good morning. thank you for taking my call. i have been watching the hearings off and on and it has not changed my mind. my mind was made up as far as what donald trump and his cohorts have been doing. i agree with the caller a couple before me. this is really not a republican or democratic issue or independent issue. this is a fight for democracy. this man has subverted every agency that was in the government since the time he was in there. he did all kinds of nefarious things that were not legal and he had people in there that let him do whatever he needed to do. the hearing is fair. the republicans had their opportunity to participate and

they chose not to. the republicans that are earnest about finding out the truth, if the other republicans were interested, they would have been on the panel as well. this is the side you get, the truth. if they would have been on the panel, there would have been drama and we would have never gotten to this point. whatever is being shown is true. it is amazing to me people still will not believe the truth. you could put a mirror in front of them face and they will still say it is not them. these people will believe to the end and if that is the case, they need to go like jim jones and drink the kool-aid. thank you. host: lydia mentioned the republicans on the panel. we know that republicans did

reject the initial bipartisan panel. the select committee mostly has democrats but there are two republicans, liz cheney and representative adam kinzinger. i am pulling up the profile that ran in "the washington post" about adam kissinger and they said he was considered a star in the conservative party. he was one of the favorites of kevin mccarthy. he said now that he served on the committee investigating former president trump's role in inciting the capitol riot, he is no longer the baby faced 32-year-old whose future seems limitless. forced into retirement this year he reserves his anger for people like mccarthy and other leaders who keep falling in line with the ex-president they privately,

and sometimes publicly, condemned. he is one of two republicans on the january 6 committee. back to the phone lines in decatur, georgia. you will have to tell me your name. i think it is gar? caller: gar, g-a-r. i called trump the derek chauvin of politics. we saw derek chauvin kyl george floyd and some people say it is all right. you are going to have people say, it did not happen. what we have in america today is some people want a dictator leadership. biden is no dictator. he could not be a dictator if he wanted to be, but americans want a dictator.

trump understand that. hitler had followers. mussolini had followers. trump had followers. that is what we have got to understand. thank you. host: next elaine on the republican line from south glastonbury, connecticut. go ahead. caller: the media, there is so much january 6. how many times are we going to hear the same things over and over and over? i am 86 years old and i live on a low income. when trump was in everything was beautiful. gas, oil, everything. when biden came in everything was a rotten disaster. nobody seems to look at that or care about it and he blames

everything on somebody else. it is just a disgrace what he has done to america. i think these people, schumer and pelosi, they knew that was going to happen. they asked for help before it happened and they discarded it. and the thing of it is, you have a rotten panel. they are all democrats, they all hate trump. they ripped him apart since day one. it was disgusting what they have done to that man and his family. host: thank you so much. we are going to take another call. adam from jersey city, go ahead. adam, are you with us?

let's go ahead and hear from president trump's former attorney general bill barr. he is talking about the committee's ability to build a criminal case against former president trump. [video clip] >> i think if people want to view this as a potential crime, the police to investigate is the department of justice through grand jury. >> and they are. >> that is a secret process. we do not know how much is going on. i don't think the congress is the proper vehicle. i think they should focus on the storyline. if they want to make the case this was reprehensible behavior, which i think it was, or the president was derelict in not following up during the hours

this was going on, make the case but the constant talking heads talking about whether this is a crime or evidence of a crime is a misuse of the process. it highlights the fact it is a committee that has been weighted one direction. however, i think that is also stale. there is no cross-examination. that's true. but still, they have brought out important facts people need to take note of. for merrick garland to pull the trigger on a criminal prosecution of a former president is a high bar. i think he will apply. i think you will need clear evidence and i think i am dubious they have reached that stage. host: that was bill barr talking about building a case against former president trump. back to the phone lines to hear from you on whether you have

been watching the january 6 committee hearings and if anything you have heard has changed your mind. michelle in upper marlboro, maryland on the independent line. caller: good morning. thank you for taking my call. yes, i have watched the hearings. my mind has been changed. i did not have a favorable idea of trump in the beginning but what changed my mind was the administration, his administration. i was not aware of the number of people that told him he lost the election. it was really just rudy giuliani keeping it going. i was happy to see that not everyone in the white house was in step with the lie. the second point i want to make is i wish that the hearings would not only focus on trump's desire for power but also money.

losers do not make money and i think trump wanted to win. he could not bear losing not because he wanted to be president for power, but he wanted to brand that trump name and losers do not bring in as much money. i wish folks would focus on that. but i have been pleased with the hearings and have learned a lot. really blessed and inspired by the women, cassidy hutchinson, liz cheney, who are really taking -- not taking charge -- but playing a pivotal role in the hearings. lastly, with gas prices and inflation this is reaction to the months of covid. trump did not create covid

but he worsened it by not taking action. this is the market trying to recapture those losses. host: thank you so much, michelle. michelle mentioned the women who have often been at the forefront of these committee hearings. this is "the new york times" this morning, women face vitriol for testimony. before sarah matthews, a former deputy white house press secretary, even opened her mouth to testify thursday before the select committee investigating the january 6 assault on the capitol the house attacked her on twitter as a liar and pond of democrats -- pawn of democrats. they did not mention the man sitting before her, the former national deputy security advisor, who was also issuing a scathing indictment of donald trump's behavior on the day of the riot. nor did mr. trump mention mr.

pottinger but calling ms. matthews a liar. we will go back to the phone lines. adam, jersey city, new jersey on the democratic line. caller: can you hear me? host: yes. caller: i think the original question was, what has changed your mind? i have been impressed by liz cheney. i do not agree with almost any of her policies but i think she has profound courage. she has lost her political career for standing up for her values. she is standing up for the constitution. i think that is incredible. we are dealing with fascism in

gestation and we will take any newcomers. we want to make sure we can fight for democracy and the right to vote and peaceful policymaking. thank you so much. host: thank you, adam. you mentioned liz cheney. we are going to hear from her now during her closing statements of the january 6 committee hearings this past week. she touched on former president donald trump's supporters. [video clip] >> here is the worst part. donald trump knows that millions of americans who supported him would stand up and defend our nation were it threatened. they would put their lives and their freedom at stake to protect her. and he is preying other patriotism, their sense of justice, and on january 6 donald trump turned their love of

country into a weapon against our capitol and constitution. he has purposely created the false impression that america is threatened by a foreign force controlling voting machines. or a wave of tens of millions of false ballots were secretly injected into our elections systems. or that ballot workers are stealing elections. all complete nonsense. we must remember we cannot abandon the truth and remain a free nation. host: that was representative liz cheney speaking directly to former president trump's supporters during her closing remarks of the january 6 committee hearings. we are talking to you today about whether you have been watching and if anything you have seen has changed your mind. john in virginia. go ahead. caller: thank you for taking my

call. i don't think donald trump should get the blame for january 6, i think democrats should get the blame. they were the ones that insisted on mailing in all of these ballots so they could cheat. it is pretty obvious that they did cheat. host: thank you, john. liz in new jersey. good morning. caller: good morning. i have watched all of the hearings and i found them to be informative. i enjoyed seeing the people largely giving testimony have been republicans who backed president trump but understood

attacking the capitol was too far. i think liz cheney and kinzinger have distinguished themselves. the trumpers will never accept it but if they wanted to win the popular vote again, they have not won since 2004. they could nominate cheney and kinzinger. they would represent the middle of the road conservative views and they could gather democratic and independent voters. i want all of the people here who are so gung ho on trump,

whether you like him or not, he never won the popular vote. he did not win that in either election. the fluke of the electoral college counting. he did not have popular support. i don't know why this devotion to trump. if you lived in my home state of new jersey, you have got a front side view of him and his normal behavior of bullying and fraudulent behavior in his businesses. he went bankrupt six times. this man has never had much to contribute. never went to the military. i cannot tell you which foot has

spurs on it. host: thank you, liz. next up is anthony in detroit on the independent line. caller: good morning. i think it is a bipartisan clown show for democrats and republicans. i don't really care. i call it the redneck riot because that is what it was. usually the people would be in the back of the blue crowd -- be in the backing the blue crowd but they were assaulting police. we have liz cheney who is probably one of the biggest warmongers in congress. i think she might know a thing or two about overthrowing elections. she was deeply involved in her father's vice presidential middle east affairs.

i think liz cheney is one of the biggest problems in our country today. and then we have jamie raskin talking about his dad. his dad was very against the national security state. he was in the jfk demonstration and he was against what he called the national security state, what we might call the deep state. it is interesting to see jamie shunning his dad's legacy. and then we have adam schiff on the committee. where did russiagate go with adam schiff? where was the collusion? all they got was people lying to the fbi. the whole thing is a clash of and irrelevant to me. host: thank you, anthony. we received a couple of text messages and one comes from john in michigan.

he says, until they investigate hilary and schiff these hearings are a scam. carol is in panama city, florida. i have not changed my mind. i did not need the investigation to know that trump was head honcho for all that transpired january 6. if he is not charged, not only will that be a disgrace, we will become a laughingstock around the world. to allow that man to get away such egregious behavior would be beyond disgusting. we are going to go back to a couple of more callers. roy in woodstock, georgia. good morning. caller: good morning. if we were being honest and look at the actual timeline, and look at something other than

mainstream media, we would see another guy called michael epps encouraging people to storm the capitol. john sullivan, who was a trump hater, was at the front of the capitol. agencies have come in because remember, trump voters know that five states changed. the secretary of state changed the rules. we expected the vice president to come in and a senator to support it. pence was supposed to send them back to the state legislature.

that was what this was about, stopping pence sending it back to the states. host: roy mentioned epps. he has been around speculation and rumors regarding the riot at the capitol. he was recently interviewed. this is from his home in rocky mountain and he talks about how he suffered because of right wing conspiracy theories. ray epps suffered enormously the past months as right-wing media figures and republican politicians have baselessly described him as a covert government agent who helped instigate the attack on the capitol last year. strangers have assailed him as a coward and traitor, causing him

to sleep with one i open. it talks about him changing his life and feeling like he had to move because he is the source conspiracy theories regarding january 6. he was at the capitol but did not go in. jeff in parkersburg, west virginia. caller: thank you for taking my call. i have quick points. i have seen something on msnbc with steve bannon. three or four months before the election was held he said, this is what is trump is going to do. if he loses, he will save the election is stolen and he will never concede. everything bannon said came to pass. number two, trump says, if i can shoot somebody in the middle of manhattan, my followers would say, it wasn't me.

that is how crazy his followers are. my final point is, i am from west virginia and it is a red state. my coworkers and stuff that are trump supporters they will say, oh yeah, he may have done this but gas prices were low. that is all they go to. they watch the hearings and say, gas prices are low, food prices are low. they ignore everything else that the hearings have to say. thank you for taking my call. god bless america. host: next caller is michael in pittsburgh, pennsylvania. good morning. caller: thank you for taking my call. you had a lot of great callers from both sides of the issue, especially i believe the january 6 hearings are illegitimate. they are very one-sided. how would anyone of your

listeners want to be dominated by the prosecution where you had no defense? it is a show trial. typical of soviet russia. so many people have brought up good facts. the caller from georgia and the caller from new jersey. the reason people hate trump so much is most of the media has been focused on making him a laughingstock and wants everyone to believe -- that there was no reason to be elected president. he wanted to change things, he wanted to change the focus of what was happening in our country where it was ruled by these warmongers, like liz cheney, and so many have changed the direction of our country such that it was not benefiting the average american.

host: thank you. matt is our next caller in boulder, colorado. caller: thank you. i hope i may be able to bridge some of the political gap with my comment. it seems really clear that folks on both sides, republicans and democrats, each side believes the other side has been involved in mass election cheating. in those cases, i think both sides believe the cheating that has taken place has often happened because superiors in the parties and organizations who saw the bigger picture and knew what cheating needed to be done, they gave orders to their subordinates to carry out those orders to cheat in a variety of ways.

if both sides are to be believed, those were both illegal acts to do. and they were ordered by their superiors to do unlawful acts. from the first impeachment we know the power of whistleblowing , the colonel blew the whistle on the conversation between trump and zelensky. he reported it after the fact but it had already happened. what i propose is we can actually expand whistleblower protection to what i would call refuser protection. the moment they receive an unlawful order, if that support and understands it is unlawful,

they would have the right to say to their employer, sorry, i can't do that. that would be unlawful and they could not be fired or punished in any way. this is a new concept but it has been written into proposed legislation by lawyers in some of the washington, d.c. whistleblowers. thank you so much. host: thank you. this is former president trump responding to the select committee on truth social, which is his own social media network. he says, why aren't they asking nancy pelosi and the mayor of d.c. to testify on why they turned down my recommendation of 20,000 troops to stand guard? had they followed this

recommendation there would have been no problem on january 6. they must testify. that is former president trump giving his take on the select committee. we are going to bring up the "washington post" editorial about the most recent hearing. an excerpt says, the new details shared thursday are damning on their own but also along with the committee has laid out. all of this culminated in violence was no surprise and no accident. mr. trump had the power to start what occurred january 6 and he had the power to stop it. having exercised the former he was held to the latter. this was a violation of his oath of office, when the begin the moment he realized he lost the election, and continued until the disaster he invited struck. now the country must figure out

what to do about it. from the other side of the debate on this committee we have an op-ed written by john yiu and here is an excerpt. the house committee so far has failed to do the job for the justice department. dereliction of duty is not a federal crime. it is a political failure for which the remedy is impeachment. trump did not clearly commit incitement to violence. he spoke recklessly, but not criminally as defined by the supreme court. nor has the committee produced evidence trump inspired with violent right-wing groups to carry out the assault on the capitol, which could amount to sedition, fraud on the u.s., or obstruction of congress. so far, the committee has not shown such an understanding existed between trump and the

rioters, even if many believe his words were calling on them to stop the electoral vote count. that as a couple of op-eds with takes but we want to hear from you. have you been watching the hearings and have you changed your mind? keith in mill valley, california. what do you think? caller: good morning. thank you for taking my call. no, i have been watching very closely and i have not changed my mind. i have known trump from being an east coaster for 50 years. in my opinion, he has been financially and morally bankrupt since day one. that is all i have to say. host: thank you. scott in silver spring,

maryland. caller: i am a retired military member. i am a never trumper but he was my president. he was elected fairly and squarely. i did not approve of it, i did not approve of him in office, but he was my president. i am incensed he would take my vote away, that he would insight this riot, and i am incensed. i have been watching the hearings. i think the most chilling part for me was when we were listening to the secret service talking about how they were in fear for their life. these people pledged to protect the president and the vice president and they are fearful and our president is nothing to stop it. there is no defense. i agree 100% with what mccarthy and mcconnell said right after the january 6 insurrection. there is no defense for what he

did. i do not want to get him jailed, i do not want the president jailed because i do not want to look like some third world nation who lacks up their political opponents -- locks up their political opponents, but he has to be held responsible. this is america, not a third world country, and we deserve better. host: next up is jack in warren, ohio. caller: good morning. can you hear me? host: yes, go ahead. caller: good morning, america. has a black man in america that january 6 stuff was nothing but a joke. people were upset because they thought the democrats were taking this the wrong direction. please don't cut me off like they always do. what we are focusing on now is our gas prices, our groceries

are so high, and biden told us, if you ain't black, you cannot vote for me. but when it came to our anti-hate crime bill it was crickets from the democratic party. when it came to reparations it was crickets for black america. but when it came to afghanistan, what did the democrats do? they pull their wallets out. when they came for illegal aliens they pulled their wallets out. when they came for afghanistan, they pulled their wallets out. but what about america? what about the american people? we need help now. we need our gas prices down, we need our groceries down, and it is a shame on what the democratic party was doing. january 6 is only because of what the democratic party is doing. host: we are going to read a couple of text messages we have received. joan from minnesota says, if

they had left jordan and banks of the committee it might have been believable, but it is not. the hearings have only proved how corrupt they are. john in baltimore says, all of the witnesses, all, have been republicans. all have been longtime trump supporters and insiders, especially ivanca and jared. jim jordan is that the other congress critters, mccarthy named, would have done nothing but sabotage the hearing. let's take another phone call. glenn in port chester, new york. caller: hello, america. how are you? i am a presidential candidate but the reason is i have heard the hearings and i think former

president trump possibly could be guilty of trying to overthrow the united states government with the use of force. i would have respected him if he would have put hillary clinton in jail because she destroyed evidence. i have solutions for russia-ukraine. that is why gas prices are high. president trump did not sign the paris treaty which would have helped with our heating problem right now. god bless america. host: thank you. nancy is our next caller from montgomery village. caller: i am calling because america needs to realize we are not enemies of one another. they fail to realize that our children are watching us and they don't need to feel that america is a black or white

thing. the republicans agitated and encouraged donald trump and made him feel like he was superman and could get away with anything. if you continue to encourage the bad behavior of donald trump, what is going to happen in this country? what is going to take place when america turns against americans? i do believe the republican party, they have allowed it. they wanted this to happen but yet, when it comes time for voting, that is when they want to say, please give me your vote. please support me. send me money. but look at what is going on in their own backyard.

and who sent all the american jobs to a foreign country rather than keeping it here at home? all for the benefit of reaping the money off the american people. host: thank you, nancy. thomas in raleigh, north carolina. caller: the hearings have not changed my mind. jim jordan and mr. banks should have been on the committee but nancy pelosi knew that they would present the other side. why haven't we covered all of the rioting going on in portland? officers and businesses got looted. name one thing joe biden has done since he got in. look at baby food, gas prices, on and on and he will not take a single question when he does a press conference.

if donald trump did not take a single question, the media would be going crazy. anything joe biden or kamala harris has done has helped this country. the midterms will be the biggest red wave you have ever seen. host: barry in maryland. go ahead. caller: good morning, america. i called in because it always begs the question as to why the republican callers cannot understand this is a hearing. a hearing does not allow you or does not offer that there is going to be a defense of what they are talking about. they are holding the hearing to get information as to what went on. why do these republicans keep

talking about, oh, the hearing is not legit because there is no defense. you only get defense when you go to trial. hopefully donald trump will go to trial and he will be able to give his defense. but understand, republicans, this is not a trial, this is a hearing. there is no defense offered at a hearing. thank you. host: thank you. gilbert in lathonia, georgia. caller: good morning. we also what happened with our eyes and if they don't, they need a psychologist. most republicans want money. all they want is money and greed and they would sell their own buddies for money and greed. the things that have been done, they knew about it all the time.

they eat up all the grass. they need to stop this. if the world goes on like this, they will wish something never happened. people are going to rise from the bottom. they already rise all the billy hills but trump was the worst president we ever had in the united states. he should get everything coming for him and the people that follow him. every one of those at the white house know. hatred is going to kill you because people love you even though they hate you. host: thank you, gilbert.

next caller is april, rock island, illinois. good morning. caller: hi. how are you? host: good. caller: hello? host: go ahead. caller: i'm sorry. the only thing i have to say about january 6 is there were 200,000 people there and 250 of them were idiots. it is not a coup, it is just a bunch of idiots. you have got a lot of calls from people that hate donald trump for some reason but i want to know if they know what the first step program is. trump in the first year of his presidency made it possible for

people to get tax exemptions if they opened up a business in low income neighborhoods, and nobody cares about that. host: thank you, april. next caller is carlos in riverside, rhode island. caller: good morning, good morning. it is a wonderful thing we have here. my question is, why trump is still -- they should have put the man in jail, you know what i mean? that is where he belongs. host: thank you, carlos. next caller is marie in glen oak, maryland. caller: i think january 6 was one of the greatest gifts to african-americans.

i was proud of black men that did not fall for the trap. everyone is calling on the republican side and not saying anything about mike pence. they wanted to kill their own vice president. you put killing a vice president against joe biden's son? listen to what you are hearing. this was one of the worst days in the united states and to be honest, i would vote for donald trump to go. i have gained about 10 pounds just to see what this man was doing. i told my sister, i bet he is

sitting down watching tv, watching those policeman get theirs behinds whipped. it was a great day for african-americans. host: gwen in philadelphia, you are next. caller: hi. i wanted to talk about liz cheney on the hearing committee. she was one of the only people that did not fold to donald trump and when she speaks, she speaks the truth. she is honest and she has integrity. these other guys that said what they said right after the insurrection, they ended up changing their tune in order to bow down to donald trump. i give her a lot of credit and adam kinzinger. on another order, biden is getting the blame for all of the

problems in our country. but did you consider that trump left it that way? trump, when he lost the election november 3, he really did not do anything presidential from november 5 until january 6. he was missing in action, playing golf or whatever he was doing. he really left the country in bad shape. he was poor on the pandemic. he never encouraged people to wear masks. he never tried to mitigate the pandemic. he refused to wear masks and all of us that got vaccines, the people who didn't, they are riding on our backs. this would still be going strong if people would have not gotten the vaccine and not tried their

best to stop the pandemic. one more thing. everybody says, well, there were billions of people disappointed. that happens every time there is an election. there is always a side that is disappointed. i had tell my own sister that. host: we are going to take a quick break. coming back, we will have b.j. martino and jim manley discuss campaign 2022 and political news of the campaign 2022 and political news of the day. later, our landmark legislation series continues with a focus on the 1996 personal responsibility and work opportunity act, which overhauled the nation's welfare programs. we will be joined by two historians with expertise on the issue, edward berkowitz of george washington university and sanford schram of spencer college. ♪

>> c-span has unfiltered coverage of the house january six committee hearings. go to c-span.org/january6, our web resource page, to watch videos of the hearing, briefings, and investigation since january 6, 20 21 to we will have reaction for members of the congress, white house, and journalists. go to c-span.org/january6, for a fast and easy way to watch when you can't see it live.

this week on the c-span networks, wednesday morning, ceo's of some of america's leading firearms manufacturers will testify before the house oversight committee on the axis and office of gun makers. on thursday morning, the house judiciary committee testifies on the house division, and the department of veterans affairs on ending sexual harassment the v.a. the senate returns to capitol hill on monday. it plans to expand health care benefits to veterans exposed to toxins during their service. the house is picking up legislation expected to be passed by the senate. members will vote on a wildfire and drought relief bill. watch this week live on the c-span networks or on c-spannow, our free mobile video app. head over to c-span.org for

scheduling information or to stream video, live or on-demand, anytime. c-span, your unfiltered view of government. ♪ join "washington journal" every sunday for a special six part series on landmark legislation. each week, historians and experts will explore a piece of legislation that helped shape today's america, how we get around, educate our kids, pay for health care, and welcome new citizens to the country. this morning, we will look at the welfare reform act of 1990 six, which requires recipients to begin working within two years of receiving benefits and enacting a five-year cap. watch live atis morning on c-spn c-span now, our free mobile app. "washington journal" continues. host: welcome back and welcome

to our guest of the hour. we have with us republican pollster b.j. martino, and then we also have democratic strategist jim manley, and they are going to talk to us about campaign 2022 and the political news of the day. b.j., you are the new president and ceo of the tarrance group, and i want to ask you about the january 6 hearings. we were just talking about them. what are your thoughts on the impact so far? do you think it is cut through at all to people at home? guest 1: well, if you look at the numbers in terms of the ratings for the hearings, it is about less than 20% of what we would expect turn up to be in an off year election. in many ways, many people paying the most attention to these hearings are democratic base

voters, those who are already going to show on election day, those who are already going to vote for democrats. what you are seeing is an impact in terms of energizing that ocean of the base -- portion of the base. you see higher motivation among the right now could the question going into the fall for democrats is whether that energy level can be sustained, given that there are so many other issues, particularly economic concerns, driving the electorate. if you look at the course of the hearings, yes, there is some democratic base motivation, but as we move into the fall and the campaigns get underway, i think that will be difficult for democrats to sustain. host: we will get your calls in just a moment. i want to remind you that democrats can dial (202) 748-8000. republicans, (202) 748-8001. independents, dial (202) 748-8002. you can also text us at (202) 748-8003. please include your name and your city.

you can also send us a tweet @cspanwj. we are also on instagram @cspanwj and facebook.com/cspan. jim, i want to ask you a little bit more about the january 6 hearings, because b.j. just said that, you know, he feels like it is really the democrats who are watching this and getting the most fired up. do you agree with that? do you think there is any way that republicans are swayable at all when it comes to these hearings and their particular influence? guest 2: well, a couple of things. first of all, let me say i spent 21 years, i spent far more time that i probably deserved either putting together hearings, watching hearings, attending hearings. these are by far the best hearings i have ever seen in my

lifetime, in part because it has been played very smart, and they limited the number of speakers, and that while each and every senator and house member, as the case may be, to onto the gate. regarding your -- to pontificate. regarding a question, it remains to be seen. the level of a monday night football game, 18 million people. i think that republicans on the hill are feeling a little bit of heat, if you are watching their body language, they are certainly feeling some pain. but how much of an impact it is going to have on the elections in november, i think, remains to be seen. host: b.j., i'm going to ask you a question, but first, we are going to hear from liz cheney, during her closing statements, this is her touching on former

president trump supporters. [video clip] rep. cheney: here is the worst part. donald trump knows that millions of americans who supported him would stand up and defend our nation, were it threatened. they would put their lives and their freedom at stake to protect her, and he is praying on their patriotism. he is preying on their sense of justice. on january 6, donald trump turned their love of country into a weapon against our capital and our constitution. he has purposely created the false impression that america is threatened by a foreign force voting machine, tens of millions of false ballots secretly injected into our election system, or that ballot workers have secret thumb drives and are stealing elections with them.

all complete nonsense. we must remember that we cannot abandoned the truth and remain a free nation. host: so, b.j., we just heard from representative liz cheney, the vice chair of that committee. do you think that is a fair care grace vision that she laid out -- characterization that she laid out? guest 1: i think in terms of the messaging, particularly republican voters being told they are victims and have been duped is a message that is likely going to fall on deaf ears. but i think more importantly, it speaks to this desire and desperation from some to make donald trump the issue again, make him relevant to voters in terms of their vote decision. what we have not had a discussion, and i'm sure we will get to, is the fact that he is not president anymore, and one thing we saw very clearly in the virginia elections last year was that despite the efforts of

democrats to make donald trump relevant, they ran over 12,500 individual spots trying to link glenn youngkin to donald trump. joe biden is president. it is the reality of everyday lives that is driving the decision-making. when i hear this, i think that, first of all, republicans are not going to be very amenable to that message. and at the end of the day, when we get into the issues of this campaign, the decision-making is going to be made about the realities of today and not backward looking to events that were a year and a half ago. host: so b.j. just mentioned that, of course, trump is no longer president, but we know that a lot of republican candidates are still eager to have his endorsement. so last month, layton masters, who is running for senate in arizona, a swing state, aired this ad come and which he is

endorsed by former president trump. the winner of the primary will face incumbent senator democrat mark kelly. [video clip] mr. trump: blake masters is an american first fighter. he will protect our borders, he is strong on election fraud, frankly, strong on everything needed to keep america first. blake masters has my complete and total endorsement. mr. masters: i am blake masters, and i approve this message. thank you. mr. trump: thank you. host: jim, i'm going to send this question to you first. we are looking at former president trump in endorsing in this senate primary in arizona. do you think his endorsement still has weight? what kind of impact does the trump endorsement have, especially in primaries? guest 2: well, once again, we are going to have to wait and see how this all plays out, but

i think, if you take a step back, you will find he has somewhat of a mixed record of course, being trump, he likes to pad his record by telling, you know, the max endorsement of endorsements and/or winners. he is playing in a primary, and the question is whether it will blow up in his face or not, or, in mitch mcconnell's case, because i am in a weird situation right now, where i am hoping against hope that in these republican primaries, they nominate the most extreme, most toxic person possible, in the hope, in the expectation that they are going to lose in november. i never thought i was going to be in that position, but here we are. 1 well, if i can jump in, too, i think, to jim's point, he is not alone in that sentiment, that

there are democratic entities around the country who are spending millions of dollars playing in the republican primaries right now in order to grant jim his wish. on top of that, when you look at the donald trump endorsement, in a primary, all things being equal, i liken it to an olympic level regimen of diet and exercise that can take a seasoned athlete and turned them into an olympian. give me an olympic level diet and exercise regimen, i am not going to win a gold medal. he has to have quality candidates, and when he has quality candidates running good campaigns, coupled with a trump endorsement, that is often times a recipe for success, but you have to have both of those things going on. you can not make someone a whole cloth, the nominee, without a strong campaign. host: we have your calls now,

jim manley is a democratic strategist, and b.j. martino is a republican pollster, make sure not to miss those up. you can get in on the cause, (202) 748-8000, if you're a democrat. republicans, (202) 748-8001. independents, dial (202) 748-8002. you can also text us, with your name and city, and send it to (202) 748-8003. we also have twitter, @cspanwj. first on the phone lines, we have malik in arlington, texas. go ahead, malik. caller: first of all, i would like to say, the republican party as of now is nothing more than a socially acceptable fascist movement led by the unintelligent, most morally corrupt, worst president in the history of the united states in donald trump. i also watch the january 6 hearings, and in my opinion, they laid out a strong case that

donald trump is guilty of treason. i'm not being bombastic. i really believe he should be tried for treason. if he goes to jail, i hope they would convict. talking about november, i am not hearing any party, republicans or democrats, talk about the housing crisis in this country, the rates of mortgages, the extreme increase in housing prices, the amount of corporate landlords, the increase in rent. there's going to be a housing crisis coming soon with working-class people. here in texas, we have houses worth maybe $20,000, $30,000 in very drug infested communities asking prices a quarter million dollars. we need to talk about banking reforms, such as getting rid of private mortgage insurance or any reform that would help working-class people. we don't have it anymore. we have one party, the democrats

, obsessed with the legal immigrants, and we have the other party, republicans, obsessed with social issues, abortion, gay marriage, things that do not move the country forward in any kind of way. host: ok, thanks. we will let our guests respond. we will start with you, b.j.. guest 1: sure. you make a good point in terms of housing costs. it is part of the basket of economic concerns voters have. in their day-to-day level, there are gas prices, grocery prices, and those are something voters struggle with almost on a day-to-day basis. then there is housing costs, and there are solutions out there. i think you will hear them from republican candidates going forward, as campaigns continue. bringing down overall the level of inflation and putting halt to rising prices, particularly by stopping the gross amount of spending going on in washington.

secondarily, it is also about producing regulations that allow us to build new housing. there is only one way to sort of grow out of housing price troubles, and that is to allow new houses to start. host: let's go to our next, caller, amy in georgia on the democratic line. go ahead, amy. caller: good morning. host: good morning. caller: our country was attacked on january 6 by republicans, white nationalists, and insurrectionists, and there is an ongoing attack. so why are we treating the selection liken normal election with a normal republican candidate? we saw them attack the constitution, the rule of law, they don't believe in it, and here you guys are, talking like we are having a normal midterm election. we are not. we are under attack by fellow citizens who do not believe in multi-racial pleural

distro democracy. explain to me why we are just continuing as if it is a business as usual, when it isn't? host: thank you. guest 2: let's state the obvious, i largely agree. we are dealing with, when it comes to the republican party one that is this tingly at all odds with our democratic -- distinctly at odds with democratic traditions. i got lucky, was spent in the capital, to see those themes again last thursday night of the rampaging running through the senate, which was extremely disturbing, and, frankly, very upsetting. it does not mean we can't sit here and talk about the issues, but, you know, again, even in

their party, there is a fundamental disconnect in one party, members of one party want to undermine basic democratic norms in this country. host: all right, next caller, n ate in las vegas. nate, go ahead. caller: yeah, good morning. after listening to the first two callers, now i know this country is messed up. donald trump is the most conservative president we have ever had. we have him to thank for taking hold of this abortion issue. the idea that ms. january 6 thing -- this january 6 thing was more or less a little riot, ok, but the 90% of media, which is democrat, keeps it on the burner.

what needs to happen is, after we take back the house, make donald trump the speaker of the house, put it right in their face that republicans have the guts to do this. i'm disappointed that republicans chose to ignore these hearings. it would have been nice to hear someone come back on. where are the two marines supposedly to testify about grabbing the wheel? where are they? why hasn't nancy pelosi been called? trump said nancy pelosi refused national guard troops. why is it what down? ? i see this democratic strategist talk about monday night football having the same amount of viewings. that is garbage. al gore challenged the election, and because he challenged the election, bush could not put in his government. and i blame him for 9/11. host: ok.

a lot of people think like nate. guest 1: there is a great deal of media focus on these hearings, as they should be, because it is large national news. but it is going to change. these hearings are going to come to an end. voters are going to focus on things that matter to their everyday lives. it is undeniable in the polling that a vast plurality if not a majority of voters have focused on rising costs of living. we see time and time again over the course of this year, as different events occur, there's a temporary focus, as voters pay attention to those things, up within two days later, they go back to the gas pump, they go back to the grocery store and the economic realities of their lives come back into play. once again, the focus will turn to this current administration, the biden administration, and the democratic control of congress that has led to -- and many voters believe -- has led

to these economic problems that we are in now. at the campaigns really kick into high gear, i think you will see a return to that focus, and you will see that that will, you know, make the races much more competitive and allow us to really tell the story, from a republican perspective, of what is going on in the last year and a half. guest 2: for what it's worth, if i could, tia, i largely agree with what b.j. just said. i said i was not competent how this will play out kid i think b.j. largely nailed it when he said at some point, it is going to get back to economic issues. gas prices are going down pit when it comes to november, in the end, i think it will largely be dominated by economic issues. host: thank you for that. let's bring up a new ad from the nonprofit group one nation, that is aligned with senate republican leader mitch mcconnell. this is an ad attacking

incumbent senator mark kelly, who is a democrat. it puts inflation, talks about his support for president biden's spending plan. let's watch this ad. [video clip] >> wasteful government spending is to blame for inflation. senator mark kelly was a deciding vote for president biden's's spending spree, millions spent on golf courses, wasting $140 million on a high-end florida hotel. senator kelly and president biden's spending, and what do we get? inflation, soaring groceries. tell senator mark kelly, stop being record spending to stop inflation. host: jim, we just saw that ad, as we have been talking about. republicans are saying this upcoming midterm will be about the economy, and by tying democrats to president biden's

message, they can defeat them. what do you think when you see ads like this? guest 2: among other things, the issue of inflation is incredibly powerful. i'm not going to sit here and deny that that is not going to be a problem in november. as your viewers may or may not know, we have a whole bunch of economic news coming out this week, you know, those that watch it carefully are calling it a torrent of important numbers coming out this week. at the end of the week, we are going to have a better handle on, you know, where we are going with the economy and inflation in particular. but the issue of inflation is very insidious. it is right through, you know, everything important to the american people, including gas prices, grocery prices, etc. it is going to be something that is going to cause this administration some pain for the next couple of months, until it

rings itself out of the system. in the meantime, i was just in minnesota. i saw similar ads and is a local congresswoman, attacking her for similar issues. guest 1: historically, in washington, we have paid attention to rates, inflation, down to 7%, hooray, we fixed it. the fact is, to so many americans, the economic damage that has been done by higher prices is going to be felt far into the future. wages, in many ways, will still not catch up to inflation, and voters may talk to them in focus groups and in surveys. they don't pay attention to what the number is on the inflation rate. they are paying attention to the things they see in and around their lives, businesses on main street my housing prices, their

own bank accounts, what the gas prices are. they are going to look at all these indicators, and in many ways, even if the inflation rate starts to take down into the fall, for many americans, they are going to be in the whole and deeply in the hole. there's a point at which, until things turn down, the reality is for many americans, they will not be out of this economic damage that has been w rought for a year or more to come. host: let's talk to another viewer, john west in lafayette, indiana says, "how did the two guests thank the scotus decision will impact the upcoming election?" we are talking about the abortion decision. the democratic national committee released an ad targeting republicans on abortion. let's watch this ad. [video clip] >> republicans are celebrating

ending a woman's right to choose. >> this is a moment of incredible celebration. >> what a great victory. >> they are not done yet. mike pence wants to ban abortion in every state. mitch mcconnell says a national abortion ban is possible. 50 years of women's rights stripped away by the few, but we are the many. we will fight for freedom, and we will not be silenced. the democratic national committee is responsible for the content of this advertising. host: we will start with you, b.j. are you concerned at all that, you know, despite a lot of things going into republicans' favor going into midterms, that abortion will be something that could help turnout democrats? guest 1: it certainly is a motivating factor. again, when we saw the decision come out, we saw a level of intensity rise among base democratic voters. and now with the january 6 hearings. but those things tend to be temporary and, again, it comes back to, as everyday lives

happened voters, and they have to pay attention to things around them, and their basic needs of providing shelter and food for their family. so we see issues like this, and i know that democratic campaigns will continue to beat this, because it is a way to continue to generate intensity within their base. but the thing about the abortion issue we need to pay attention to is we so easily polarizes country into pro-life, pro-choice, right? and you will find voters who they call themselves pro-choice or they may call themselves pro-life, but they agree on a number of things, and those who believe that abortion should be illegal in all circumstances, up until the minute of birth, for whatever reason, are small numbers, as are those who believe abortion should be illegal for any reason. when you have are people who

either don't want to talk about this issue, because they are focused mother things, or they don't see it as polarized that way, they see it as areas of gray in between. and as we talk about this issue more, i think you are going to find that both sides, both extremes are going to turn voters off. when that is muddied, they go back on and moved to other issues. the easy issue that they have to go focus on once again is economics. host: jim, i want to bring you in. what are your thoughts on the impacts of the supreme court decision, reversing roe v. wade, might have on this midterm? guest 2: a couple different things, tia. first of all, if you look in the past, the supreme court, for whatever reason, has been much more vague rallying cry for republicans than it has been for democrats. as someone who has complained publicly about this for years, every two years, i hope to

change it. i wish it would change, but it hasn't. this time, i am once again expressing the hope that it is going to serve as a motivating factor that the democrats will get out a vote. that is number one. number two, i would remind you that it is not only abortion-related issues but also the gay marriage issue also as well, and so that is why it is fascinating to me to watch the house this week. they had a series of votes this week on abortion and gay marriage, and it was fascinating to watch, to see how republicans in the house and also in the senate were maneuvering to try to deal with both of those issues. there is going to be a vote, i think, on gay marriage the senate as well, following up on what the house did, in the weeks to come, and, you know, first of

all, a whole bunch of, a set of republicans really did not seem interested in having that vote. but as more and more folks kept on to the issue, they are resigned to the fact that they are going to have to vote on it. you know, again, i hope it will serve as a motivating factor for democrats in the election in november. i'm a little dismayed that, you know, young folks aren't showing so much enthusiasm for biden right now. i guess i understand some of that, the dismayed, and my hope is that this issue in particular is going to get them out and voting in november, because the choice could not be clearer. guest 1: well, if i may come awaiting into the supreme court decision has been dangerous for democrats in the past.

the solutions democrats are putting forward in terms of increasing the numbers on the court n-terminal meds for justices are all things that will, i think, inadvertently for democrats, and up motivating republicans if not more than democrats. it is dangerous ground. host: we have michael from akron, ohio. go ahead. caller: good morning. i know that you guys on the inside has to have a google when you hear some of these comments or these ignorant people calling in. i am just -- the level of disconnect, the level of ignorance, the cognitive dissonance, these are the individual that scare me, not the jim jordans, not the ntg's, they have an agenda. they have an election. he is a popular guy, so they have to stand behind him. but i know it is all about

really this white nationalist stuff that is going on. it is amazing. i cannot believe that these individuals who cannot count past the second amendment, who believe the pandemic was "fake news" started by democrats, and all the other countries care about american politics. and it is like they are just there to distract. these are the individuals i am scared of. they are there to radicalize, and they are listening to this bull. so i'm just saying. host: thanks, michael. b.j., would you care to respond? guest 1: i'm always happy to hear from a fellow ohioan. i was just back there last week. in terms of politics, what we hear, especially in social media and what is elevated, extreme voices are often elevated often times on both sides and appeared to have a larger share of the mind than one would expect,

because they are screaming so loudly. i think what you look at when you look at the vast majority of voters in this country, and i'm talking vast majority, are reasonable people who care about reasonable things, and given the vote, when they do make reasonable decisions, not based on extremism on either side. host: all right, and dj, in hampton, virginia, good morning. caller: good morning. i have a question for you first. the hearings are over now until september. why do you keep on dragging this up every day? we want some other news. let's see c-span cover the hunter biden thing for the next month, and then you can go back in september and do the hearings. but 1% of the american people are listening to these hearings. that shows you how disinterested

the american public is. so please try something else. we are really tired of hearing about this. and, to your guests, i have a couple of things, i wonder how they feel about the hearings and i believe personally that the democrats are so afraid of the election coming up that they are hanging on to anything they can, and that is why they keep hammering away at these hearings. we are not interested in that anymore. host: ok, thank you, b.j. we are going to let jim respond, but i want to first point out that c-span does cover all congressional hearings, committee hearings, and floor actions, gavel-to-gavel. so anything that is going on involving u.s. congress will be on c-span. but, jim, do you want to respond

to that caller? guest 2: well, we just checked one box. you can't have a discussion in this day and age without raising hunter biden, so we have got that going for us. number two, she may say that the american people are not paying attention, but that is not factually true. number three, the reason why those hearings are covered is because the president of the united states, along with his aides, try to undermine the government of this country. you know, in a perfect world, these hearings would not have occurred. in a perfect world, we would try to figure out ways to compromise on legislation and try to get it through the house and senate, to the president for his signature. unfortunately, this is not a perfect world, and it is crucial that we conduct these hearings

to get to the bottom of what exactly happened and put blame accordingly if need be. obviously i am biased, but my take away from these hearings is this president, or former president, excuse me, is guilty of formal charges, including aiding and abetting insurrection, whatever the technical term is that the lawyers are going to use. so, you know, i cannot wait for the hearing in september, is what i'm trying to say. it has been devastating, and smart republicans know it. if you don't want to pay attention to it, that is fine, but a lot of other people are. guest 1: jim slipped a bit and called trump the president instead of the former president. guest 2: i was hoping you would not notice that. [laughter] guest 1: it is an attempt for many on the democratic side to try to change the subject from a really hard truth, and that is

that president biden has a 37 percent job approval rating nationally across the average of all the national polls. and there is an immense about of gravity among that number, and when voters are focused on his term as president and the issues that are surrounding that, and everything starting with back to afghanistan and covid cases rising and crime, and then add on top of that the number one issue of rising prices and costs of living, that focus is a real danger for democrats going into the fall. so there is really an attempt, yes, to make this election about literally anything else other than the president, because they know that if there is any amount of focus on the part of voters, on the existing administration and those who are actually in congress right now, that spells trouble for democrats. host: elmo in denton, texas, you are on. caller: hello.

next week, i turn 90 years old, and one of the curses of being 90 is that you've seen most of everything, and you know how it is going to turn out, and that is kind of what is going on now. the day that biden was inaugurated, i filled up my pickup for $1.39. why? one, because i live in texas, thank god. there are six filling stations within two blocks of the corner, which gave me a heavy incentive, and three, the u.s. was energy nondependent. now, as a result of the last election and the ineptitude of biden's staff -- not biden, but biden's staff -- i'm becoming

much better off than i was before. i'm a little bit ashamed of it. i don't know much about investing. i wish they had taught that in high school, but when i went to high school, we were still using savings stamps. but i have heard about supply and demand. so what i figured is when biden shut down the oil patch, the supply was going to be limited. so i took all of my retirement account and bought petroleum companies stocks. . i bought almost every company and discovered they pay something called dividends. every three months, they give you this cash. and then i read that they are having trouble getting fruit from the permian back to the refineries, because they did not have enough pipelines, and we have regulations against pipelines. and i find out that these

companies, lnp's, they pay bigger dividends. host: elmo, so do you have a question for our guests today? caller: do i have a question? host: yes, please. caller: no, i guess i don't have a question, what i am doing is saying that the negative part of inflation and -- is if you are thinking about it, you can overcome it, like i by u.s. choice t-bone steaks for five dollars a pound at albertson's if i buy four at a time. host: thank you, elmo. jim, do you want to respond to the caller? he was talking about inflation,

high gas costs, a lot of those pocketbook issues. guest 2: well, first of all, kudos for reaching 90 next week. that is one heck of an achievement. yeah, i guess i appreciate the fact that he is finding ways to get around inflation. not everyone is having that kind of success right now, quite friendly, i'm not so sure i agree -- in fact, i know i don't agree with his reference to this country being not energy independent, understood him correctly. we are. you know, the economy is -- i am not a stockbroker, but by dividend stocks, absolutely. host: all right, next caller, earnestine in north carolina on the democratic line. you are on. caller: yes. good morning. thank you for taking my call.

i have a lot to say, but i cannot get it all in this 1 -- host: pick your biggest point and go ahead. caller: ok. my biggest point is trump. he has bipolar. people don't know it -- no, they know it, but they don't want to accept it. when he was coming out of the chair, his own people were so scared he was going to hit the button and start world war iii, they started begging people to get him out the chair. and not only that, when that woman said "we are going to go down to the capital, and fight, fight," what did that mean? that means he was going to fight and pardon what followed. not only that, the republican people sat in this room with him -- i mean, they are not thinking clearly.

it is going to happen to democrats. it is going to happen to them, too. not only that, but president biden, lord, thank you jesus, when they got him in a chair, trunk locked him out of the white house, so he could not get in. he is a bully. who wants a bully to run for president? he should not be allowed to run for anything. what he should be allowed to do is go to jail. host: thank you. this is a tweet from a larry hogan, of maryland. he is a term limited governor. he said "trump loss the white house and the senate. he selfishly colluded to cost as a governor seat in maryland, where i ran 45 went ahead of him. he is fighting for his ego.

we are fighting to win, and the fight goes on." dj, i want to ask you, is president trump's existence, is his continued involvement something that you think is a positive or negative overall for the republican party? guest 1: overall it is a positive for the republican party our coalition has changed since 2016. look at the voters who are voting republican now. the prior caller notwithstanding, not the first person who said i am not right and they had, but i go back to the 2016 election, and i think about what i started hearing from voters, and president trump talked to those working-class voters who are lower and middle class that have been ignored by the democratic party for years, and it created new opportunities for our already to talk to voters who had not considered voting

republican in the past. and that includes "new york times hispanic voters -- and that includes, you know, hispanic voters, which have seen significant changes over the last several years. there are certainly opportunities for republican candidates. but, again, the fact is, he is not the president, and the desire to talk to either relitigate the past in these campaigns, or you watch democrats already talking about 2024, as if jill biden is out of office, they are trying to just ignore this space that is filled by the sitting president and pretend that he is not there, and voters see that. they are not being gas led by democrats who want to talk about something else, and certainly republican campaigns are going to remind them of that and the existing administration. host: let's talk about some of these campaigns in swing states,

in seats that either republicans or democrats would like to pick up seats, to try to sway that majority. we are going to bring up a new ad about personal values from herschel walker, who is challenging incumbent senator raphael warnock in georgia. let's watch this ad. [video clip] >> here is what i can do to make things better and bring people together. i love this country. i believe in peace and strength. when we have no strength, we will have no peace. i believe in backing the blue. i believe the constitution. i believe everyone will have the chance to have their say. we have problems? yes. can we solve them? yes. georgia is my family. the united states is my home, so i'm going to fight and take care of them. i am herschel walker, and i approve this message. host: jim, i'm going to ask you, you know, there has been a lot of talk about gop candidates being flawed, but we know in the polling, herschel walker, you know, you talk about j.d. vance, you talk about some of these

other candidates. even though they are flawed, they are pulling very well. what do you make of this? guest 2: what do i make of it? i reference to this earlier, and i will reiterate once again, i am in a position where, look, for me, control of the senate is everything, ok? the question is whether democrats can keep the senate, and i am hopeful that we can keep the senate, in part because of candidates like herschel walker, who is a walking disaster. i mean, he just strong nice words together. not sure what they mean, but once you get him on a stop, you know, the guy cannot string together, you know, anything intelligible in english. he is not telling the truth. he has got wacky ideas.

and, you know, i can only imagine that senator mcconnell is looking, getting a little nervous, you know, looking at these races, you know, wondering if he will be able to maintain the majority or not. host: dj, let me bring you in. we know republicans are hoping to pick up a theater to, so that they can get a majority in the senate. where do you think the candidates are, and you candidates like herschel walker make it tougher for republican candidates? guest 1: you make it sound like flawed candidates is something republican candidates have cornered the market on. candidates are flawed. this is why we run campaigns. it is not the initial stumbles, it is not the initial statements as a candidate who is raw, such as herschel walker, who has never run for office before, makes. it is about what happens when

they start messaging to them. when you look at an ad like this, he is introducing himself in a way that just touches on a lot of, different things and it is really setting the table for a lot of what the campaign is going to be about. despite the fact that he has not run for office before and has not been known as a political figure before, you are exactly right -- the numbers are in single digits right now. you look at a state like ohio, where we are going to keep the senate seat there, you know, there are fundamental forces at work in terms of the partisanship at stake that are undeniable. i think you will see things ultimately change as we really get into these campaigns. there's a fundamental difference between the moment prior to when these campaigns have really begun spending money on the air, talking about us getting their message through unfiltered to voters and what happens after that once the give-and-take

really starts. host: i think the voters in georgia and other states say, "there's going to be more ads?" because they are already seeing quite a bunch months before that november election. let's go back to the phone line. john in california. john, go ahead. caller: you were right on. most people aren't. thank you for taking my call, number one. i'm a little off subject in my own head, because i heard the democrat supporter talk about herschel walker not being able to string together a sentence and like that. his comments sounded almost racist. but i wonder if he has listened to his president lately and see how he gets along. the thing about herschel walker is that he is a man of principles, he is a christian, which the left-wing conservative black person, it is like a cross to a vampire.

they cannot stand the fact that somebody that grew up in the segregated south or in the sort of racist south have decided that maybe the republican party and may be the conservative way does them more good than these left-wing, far left like the person that herschel is running against, which is, i think, an avowed socialist. he is a defined the policer and things like that. what i want to talk about is donald trump. i am a person who supported trump very strongly. he has lost me completely. anybody who thought that the vice president could decide he does not have to count the electoral votes and overturn the election, any constitutional student knows better than that. taycan love -- if he had just been slightly gracious and said,

ok, i don't think the election would be fair, he would be a shoo-in in 2024, but to be honest with you, i think the election was unfair also. i think it was rigged. i think there were a lot of anomalies. one of the things that is glaring is the republicans pick up 14 seats in the congress, but their presidential candidate, the incumbent, loses. i think that is very much an anomaly. and we are never going to know for sure. i have trouble believing that 85 million americans are going to vote for joe biden, but that is just me. but donald trump needs to go away. he is going to hurt the republican party. we are going to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory in this midterm. i'm going to be surprised if we pick up 10 to 20 seats. we ought to pick up 40 to 50.

and we have no plan. remember the 1990 four election, the newt gingrich, "the contract with america"? we don't have an agenda about inflation and increasing the petroleum production, which is entirely joe biden's fault. host: thank you, john. jim, i am going to start out by letting you respond. guest 2: i don't know where to begin without it on the one hand, i'm glad that he wants joe biden -- i mean, donald trump gone. let me address the biden comment. i have known the president a long time, back when he was senator. i have not talked with him for years, but i had to deal with him all the time when he was senator. joe biden, like my former boss, senator reid, was prone, shall we say, every once in a while to put his foot in his mouth. that was true then and it is

true now. i look at the guy, and, you know, he is a man of his faculties, sure he has lost a few steps -- he is a little bit older, after all, but, you know, the kind of baseless attacks that some are running against him are just absolutely ridiculous. host: ok. mary in north carolina, you are our next caller. go ahead. caller: hi. i have a question for the democratic individual there. my question is on the border. why do democrats totally ignore what is going on on the border? i have relatives in houston and austin, and they say it is absolutely horrible what is going on, but you never hear anything about it on mainstream media. i listen to fox. i listen to newsmax. i listen to cnn and msnbc, and

the only one that is talking about is fox and newsmax. but they are finding people in bushes that are dead, that have died from the heat. it is cruel, it is inhumane, and i don't understand why democrats have no interest in it. but the man over homeland security cable tv and said "there's no problem at the border." host: ok, thank you, mary. jim, go ahead. guest 2: well, with all due respect, i don't think it is fair to say that democrats are not paying attention to what is going on at the border. i am more than willing to agree there's a difference in how we approach it. former president trump pointed out last night once again that the wall has been built, so republicans have a funny way

about what is going on down there. more needs to be done. there's no doubt about it. my hope, my desire, my wish is that someday we could pass comprehensive immigration reform that deals with a whole host of issues, including what is going on at the border. host: all right. tim in albany, new york. go ahead, tim. tim, can you hear us? caller: can you hear me? host: yes, now. go ahead. caller: hi. i just had a question for your guest there. the republicans tying their wagon to trump, i mean, i don't know where you're republican guest thanks it is going to get them, because the republicans are basically dead anyway, because the

demographics are changing. he is a malignant narcissist. he follows cognitive dissidents, and they just believe what is going on. you know, the democratic friend, winter they going to start changing citizens united and start supporting the candidates who are against getting donations from the people they serve and not serving the p.a.c. money interests? i think these are going to be the future of, you know, the party. right now, it is just the democrats and mostly liberals, but i think this will be the future of politicians, the ones that don't take private p.a.c. money and just take money from the people themselves. host: 10, thank you so much. we are going to let b.j. respond

to that. guest 1: there's no denying that race has been a driving factor in american politics for as long as there have been american politics, but i would disagree with the gentleman in saying that demographics is not destiny. the old ideology that came out many years ago that ultimately demographics would change and would lead to a democrat majority has ultimately been proven false. as you are seeing, in terms of candidates like herschel walker, and voters who are voting republican right now, you are beginning to see other things driving this decision, and the big new cleavage in american politics is economic lines, and this idea of economic populism supporting the lower and middle class versus those who are supporting the rich liberal elites, as you saw in the mark kelly add that we saw earlier today. so i disagree that demographics is destiny.

republicans are certainly doing better across all demographic groups than we have historically before, and we will be a competitive two-party country for many, many years to come. host: thank you so much. we have been chatting this morning with republican pollster b.j. martino. he was just named president and ceo of the tarrance group. we have also been speaking with democratic strategist jim manley, who spent 21 years on capitol hill. we thank both of you for joining our discussion this morning. we are going to take a quick break. up next is our landmark legislationit continues with a e 1996 personal responsibility and work opportunity act of 1996 with over -- which overhauled the nation's welfare program. we will talk to experts with expertise on the program. edward berkowitz of george washington university and sanford schram of hunter college.

♪ >> live sunday, august 7 on in-depth. columnist and talkshow host larry elder will be our guest to talk about political correctness, the left and racial politics in the united states. he is the author of several books including 10 things you can't say in america. what's race got to do with it. and a lot like me, am i more about his termination -- his turbulent -- a memoir about his turbulent relationship with his father. at least six presidents recorded conversations while in office. to hear many of those conversations during seasons to

c-span's podcast, presidential recording. >> the nixon tapes. 100% unfiltered. >> the main thing is it will pass and my heart goes out to those people who with the best of intentions are overzealous. if i could have spent a little more time being a politician last year -- i didn't know what they were doing. >> presidential recordings on c-span2. >> in march 2020, america's cruise ships experienced a covid-19 outbreak and no court would allow them to dog. -- dock.

the book cabin fever and the eventual safe harbor given in south florida. >> the virus really started becoming apparent about a week into the cruise. some of the people looking back on it noticed people were getting sick and coughing even before then. >> it kind of felt like the cruise company gambled that perhaps one last cruise could go out. this one ship and these 2000 people aboard really is a journey that symbolizes a lot of the horrors that we all went through. >> michael smith and jonathan franklin with their book, cabin fever. tonight at 8:00 p.m. eastern on c-span's q&a. listen to q&a and all of our podcasts on the free c-span now at. -- cap -- app. >> listening to programs on

c-span just got easier. tell your smart speaker play c-span radio. important congressional hearings and other public affairs events throughout the day and weekdays at 5:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. eastern. catch washington today for a fast-paced report of the stories of today. c-span, powered by cable. >> the new covenant can break the cycle of welfare. welfare should be a second chance, not a way of life. we are going to put an end to welfare as we have come to know it. i want to erase the stigma of welfare for good by restoring a simple dignified principle. no one who can work and stay on welfare forever. those who need education and training and child card