his life story may have ground to a halt. 27 years ago but there's no holding back his dreams. oh. thank you for. supermodel starts me 27 p.w. . welcome to bludge rica savers are rattling once again in the middle east as a standoff between the united states and iran intensifies the trump administration has sent an aircraft carrier to the persian gulf and is updating the war plans over what it says are iranian threats to american troops and interests this follows iran's announcement last week in response to tighter u.s. sanctions that it will partly reduce its commitment to the nuclear deal

unilaterally rejected a year ago i wash into iran also issued an ultimatum to the remaining parties to the agreement giving them 60 days to find a way to keep trading with iran despite the u.s. sanctions could u.s. pressure it produce a new and better deal as washington claims or will it result in war that's the question we pose in this edition of quadriga and here are our guests who will answer it it's a pleasure to welcome tori tausig she's a political analyst for the brookings institution currently on a robert bosch fellowship in berlin she says tensions between the u.s. and iran are escalating signals coming out of washington and tehran indicate things won't to cool down anytime soon. and we're very glad to have an arche on on the program he is a political analyst and on the iranian and shia affairs and he's editor in chief of iran under it's a german language magazine special. in recording on iran he says europe shouldn't

see iran only as a threat rather it can win tehran as a partner and it's a pleasure to introduce rick novak he's a berlin based correspondent for the washington post who covers international politics and he says both sides know that a u.s. iranian war could become more catastrophic even than the iraq war president trump could have few firm allies at home for such a confrontation. so i'd like to start out by trying to figure out if these drumbeats of war that we're hearing are in fact leading to that or whether they're simply scare tactics on both sides and for that purpose i'd like us to listen to some sound from both parties. what they should be doing is calling me up sitting down we can make a deal a fair deal we just don't want to have nuclear weapons not too much to ask and we would help put them back into great shape. would look at of negotiations with the

us or poison as long as the us is what it is and has not come to its senses. talks with the us or poison and with its current administration it's a double poison him. the tories how sick you said in your opening statement that things won't cool down soon but trump is hardly sounding they're like he's ready to go to war the fact is that he was elected in part on his assertion that he would bring home u.s. forces from the middle east and not intervene anymore in that region that's exactly right president campaigned in 2016 on bringing troops home from the middle east ending america's costly wars in the region and also withdrawing from the iran nuclear deal and renegotiating a better deal with iran's leaders over not only its nuclear weapons and its progression of nuclear weapons but also its destabilizing activity in the region the challenge is that there are hard liners in the white house that have

a very different objective when it comes to iran and that is pushing tensions to the point where we are today that i think requires us to talk a little bit about those hard liners vigneault act in your opening statement you mentioned the iraq war well the fact is that one of the chief architects of that conflict is now the national security advisor to president trump and we're told that iran policy is absolutely in his hands so what are the implications of that let's say the president doesn't want a war how does john bolton feel about it well john bolton certainly has been advocating for military options potentially or at least a very strong stance against iran but it is unclear to what extent trump actually agrees with that assertion or with that stands we have actually been hearing over the last few hours today that the trumpet has been quite opposed to some of the statements he has made. shadow are can you say that the u.s. can win iran as a partner but if we listen to that sound bite from how many it doesn't sound like

he's ready for any kind of discussions and haven't in fact hardliners in the regime in tehran been gaining sway in recent months i have to correct that i say to europe when you're on the support of not so us. at the moment the relationship but the entire one i was in is too complicated for such perspective. but you say the hardliners but i think in this regard we have really hard liners in iran because if you look at the presidential and parliamentary elections no political iran demand to have nuclear weapons to pull out from the deal so what we know seeing is let alone those so-called top line as what you see is so that even the rough reformers those centrist in iran want. pressure as a central government of mr rouhani. to increase the iranian and to

suspend some obligations and through the situation i want to come back to that in a moment but can you just say a word about the latest u.s. claims regarding iranian threat to u.s. forces in the middle east we are seeing reports today that the u.s. says it has credible evidence that missiles have been loaded on to small boats in the persian gulf and that the revolutionary guards the hard liners in iran are behind this now in april the iranian parliament declared u.s. forces in the region terrorists isn't there some good reason to be concerned in washington about what the implications of that could be i don't think so it depends on the international committee of the international entity that can help iran through events with sanctions that's the moment. it's not the moments that you want as most into the wonder you want to listen to love then it can for example blocks

through the whole most significant. person goes by there's a moment i don't sing that iran is interested in military conference i also think it's also not interest the. military conflict. what we're seeing is a loss there's this more. missiles to prevent investments and business in iran because no businessman want to deal with the county runs or feel the next the the rebel well let me ask the 2 of you how you interpret these u.s. claims about having new and credible evidence of a qualitatively higher risk torito sic you mentioned the hardliners in the white house john bolton. certainly everybody remembers the evidence that he and others presented in the run up to the iraq war is that what we're seeing here

a similar situation exaggerations or do you think this is more credible to be honest it's a little hard to tell what we're dealing with here because it did seem to appear somewhat out of nowhere about a week ago we had a scheduled visit from secretary of state mike pompei oh to berlin which was called off at the last minute so that the secretary of state could travel to iraq to meet with counterparts there to discuss what the administration said were credible threats of iranian proxies planning an attack on u.s. resources and military assets in the region we saw a very quick movement of u.s. military assets to the region and all the sudden we're in this tit for tat moment of escalation between the iranians and the americans and yet when u.s. officials such as mike pompei i have tried to make the case of credible evidence to european officials. it's been met with increasing skepticism exactly rick no act europeans definitely pushing back on this point even

a british general saying yesterday he doesn't buy the evidence he's seeing and that is quite remarkable as as you know britain is part of the 5 eyes alliance partnership and and clearly a dispute over evidence the u.s. claims could potentially justify military strikes and potentially a war with iran and the u.s. and the u.k. official denying that that is quite striking and i think that is not going to help the u.s. make its point here and in europe especially but also in other countries meanwhile shown archaea iran is saying that it will no longer comply with the limits on production of an in rich to radio that were part of that nuclear agreement that the u.s. and the 5 permanent members of the security council together with germany all signed up to so what exactly does that mean how quickly can iran rev up its nuclear

program are we now in imminent danger of seeing it essentially restart its own program. for so let me say this. is into the is a just appraiser just. gives the right to iran to do c.p.r. weighs the name of that nuclear agreement just like you are. iran's are right the also spends the right to redraw its obligations if the. laws of the do not commit not to. the rouhani. not to. tool resident rohani. not to destroy the agreement but 3 screws a game and. puts a ball in a crowd also international community especially if 3 but also russia and china to find a mechanism. you know it was the

jeans ok and we will come back to the sanctions a little bit earlier but let's take a closer look at this deal at this j. c. p. o. way as you said that at the time it was side to trump's predecessor barack obama called a historical triumph for diplomacy the deal was signed in 2015 after 13 years of wrangling the 5 permanent members of the u.n. security council on the one side and iran on the other agreed that iran would cease activities that could result in nuclear weapons production and allow robust monitoring and its spec should in return for the lifting of crippling economic sanctions europe russia and china say iran has made good on its commitment under the deal so far so torrie what exactly is it that the u.s. is objecting to. so if we go back to the $2016.00 campaign and president trump's criticisms of the iran deal he said time and time again that this was

a poorly negotiated deal it was done and acted against a rogue regime and that iran had no interest in maintaining its end of the bargain president trying to renegotiate this deal said that it was going to renegotiate a deal to focus on iran's destabilizing actions in the region in addition to its nuclear program however if we go back a year ago just over a year ago today the united states unilaterally withdrew from that deal saying that it could again renegotiate a better deal with iran what it did not anticipate was that the europeans and the iranians would both stay in the deal and try to make good on again iran putting off its nuclear ambitions for reduction and relief from sanctions and so the u.s. has been i think increasingly isolated in its attempt to try to get iran back to the table to renegotiate a better deal so sure among the things that the trump administration accuses iran of are threatening u.s.

interests in the middle east as we talked about the idea of the missiles on the boats in the persian gulf that could perhaps be aimed at u.s. forces encouraging aggression by shiite militias in lebanon iraq and syria shipping missiles to hooty rebels in yemen and allowing iranian iran's naval forces to behave belligerently in the persian gulf it's quite a long list and it's by no means fiction. i don't think so for example if you succeed as a case officer munro you're honest so hard highroad. raghad. even the state department told. before the war but the. iranians are told so just do not invade sanaz all this is very our way towards influence of iran who is on the rehman. saudi arabia knows that iran has no lobby in rest of us

iran as a pretext to legitimize a policy that does not also do so there are many other countries that the that the leg to my eyes its policy. by taking iran as surprise attacks and if you compare for example the role of saudi arabians or region and the role of iran in the region i do not see that iran's role in the region is really destabilizing i see it. support their. take on this prime minister. and pressure him to step aside. sings the only problem between those arrests or iran. is a case of if you want to salute this solves this problem we have to make peace but when its word and paralysed them and then iran come to

a damn think so make no act the europeans have said. essentially the nuclear deal contains iran is nuclear program and if we bring iran out from the into from the cold if we reintegrate them into world markets if we reintegrate them into international diplomacy that eventually will have levers to work on these other destabilizing behaviors that i listed the. there the fact is you could say given that that geo political speech you ation in the middle east with this head to head rivalry between saudi arabia and iran wasn't that pretty naive to think that we were ever going to see iran cease that kind of behavior well you could argue so and in fact for for people critical of the deal the evidence has been terror attacks or killings in europe blamed on iran over the last few months now there isn't any evidence really for that but some of claimed that this sort of indicates

that yvon won't stop its behavior and in fact it might feel emboldened by the fact that there's more money there is more economic prosperity but the europeans have been quite calm and stuck to that agreement not even really commented on on those attacks or those killings in europe to try to at least give it a chance at least try it out if it could work and that's the reason why they've set up for instance a clearing house to facilitate trade between european companies and iran even after of us pulled out of that agreement so i could just add to this very briefly i don't think that there were allusions on behalf of the obama administration that iran was a good actor in the region and all of the malign activities you mentioned were met with clear eyes by washington this iranian nuclear cord was meant to deter iran's

nuclear ambitions and that in itself there was a lot of criticism within washington and elsewhere at the time that it didn't address enough of iran's destabilizing activities in the region but again this deal was meant to deter iranian nuclear ambitions and what i worry about now is that we are back to a time where we have one you know 2 potential paths one iran kind of restart its nuclear processes or 2 we're in a play. of heightened tensions of confrontation between the united states and iran both of these paths the deal was meant to avoid in the 1st place you know about me ask you about one aspect of that and it goes back to what sharon archaea said about this historic rivalry between iran and saudi arabia the u.s. is now positioned itself very very firmly on the side of saudi arabia what impact does that have on these tensions with iran is that one of the reason we're seeing things heat up now and what consequences do you think will come of that well

certainly it does send a message just especially after the killing and the war in yemen that the u.s. still stands by saudi arabia and sends a message not only to iran but to a lot of other actors in the world but i think in terms of iran specifically yes it does embolden saudi arabia in a way to to get tougher on it and do you think it was saudi arabia wants hot war with iran. i think nobody wants war necessarily at this point what do you think really labor's the late moderate king of the demands from the u.s. to attack iran with leaks. documents. it's not you'll that's all durbin is sort of always tries to push us well against iran so let us talk briefly about where things go from here and as i said earlier the

incentive offered to tehran in the nuclear agreement was sanctions relief but over the past year the u.s. has reimposed sanctions tighten them up and now threatens to tighten them even further including both minerals and steel let's take a look. after all steel is the 2nd lifeline for iran's economy now this sector 2 must fear for its future the really 2000000 iranian citizens work in the metal processing industry. it's not just me everyone's worried we're just praying it all comes to a good end because everyone's being hurt by the sanctions it's affecting everybody . the us isn't only sanctioning iran but also any foreign company seeking to do business there this is why more and more firms are now leaving the country. this has dealt a critical blow to the economy in the past weeks prices have doubled making fruits

and vegetables an affordable for many. here does not enough the prices have been going up so we need to adapt rents are skyrocketing we've been saving on food now we see optional. as poverty grows so does the people's anger with the u.s. and europe. this could strengthen hardliners in tehran. could further sanctions force iran to its knees. shine archaean what are you hearing from friends and relatives in tehran in iran about the situation there . scientists are imposing off the us your military sanctions are. coming.

and we see for example as a prize goes high 45 present comparing to previous years then for. approximately 4 to present. we don't we do not really should not have emotion because iran has expert 40 years' experience and invite. adding sanctions yes the sanctions hurt iran but it will not bring iran to the knees. relate to what will come 20. $2020.00 in the next us presidential election there's basically 2 definitions of bringing iran to its knees one is whether prolonged hardship would possibly cause the population to rise up promote a resistance against the regime and the other one is whether it would essentially force the regime to make concessions you're saying neither because if you also look at soros also university of maryland you see since those sanctions.

people in iran. the people in iran do not like. to have negotiation for us that is this if you really compromise with so you if you give more. the u.s. wants more becomes it's becoming popular. people most of the suffering comes from the sanctions in the past people who think it was. too high a person mismanagement but it's not sukkahs more tory tosser terrorizes issued an ultimatum to the remaining parties to the nuclear deal but especially to the europeans demanding that they find a way to evade the u.s. sanctions and trade with iran in a meaningful way within the next 60 days any chance that's going to happen this ultimatum puts the europeans in a very difficult position in terms of what to do next it either can continue to do

business with iran and try to make this deal stick or it can decide that it's business with the united states is too important and let that kind of financial ties between iran and europe fade if europe does so i think iran has within its power the interest to develop closer relations with russia with china to. look elsewhere outside of this western multilateral framework for economic and financial relief could russia and china really pick up the slack to the degree that tehran is clearly hoping no i mean if we look at the economic bite of these sanctions just over the last year international estimates said that the iranian economy was already going to shrink by 6 percent over this year and i really do think that there is this deepening economic bite within iran in which it needs europe to comply by the terms of the deal in order to get out of this economic catastrophe rick know it the europeans took a pretty extraordinary step this winter they created

a new payment system to try to create essentially a space for european countries to trade with iran without having to go through u.s. based payment systems in itself a pretty extraordinary step visa vi an outlaw i think u.s. but apparently it hasn't worked very well is there any chance that this could be expanded and made really substantive in the next 60 days well that's a really good question and it is highly interesting experiment and frankly is being watched very carefully by diplomats around the world frankly because it does come down to what you just said the u.s. and the dollar as the dominant currency and there's no way around it it is however questionable whether it is going to have an impact that could preserve that deal because the iranians have gotten very frustrated over the last few weeks that it's still not really up and running and a lot of companies have pulled out and it is uncertain if they would be willing

especially if you have a a major company a global company a to to risk being part of those and lose the u.s. market for instance or sanctions right we're just about out of time but let me come back to the question posed in our title let's jump ahead 60 days ultimatum has expired or tie. well was deal or war where we think will be more because. if you look at some historians off us walsall you'll see us all very only attack countries. but false in your wallet look up you go look at the walk was gonna stumble and be wrong or so to you which captures a chill for the blood for a. good for example the best thing we can hope for is for the iranians the americans to come back to the table and talk to one another in the next 60 days not you might still be in the same position we're in today really thanks very much to all of you for being with us thanks to you out there for turning n c you said.

place. to sleep. carefully. don't suit. me to do get.

discovered. the i. subscribe to documentary on you tube. you know that 77 percent. are younger than 6 o'clock. that's me and me and you. know what time of voices i watch on the 77 of a sense to talk about the issues. from a politician to flash from housing boom boom boom town this is what. welcome to the 77 percent. this weekend on d w. e the only game.

should love is from sabbat. is the muslim brotherhood. seems. priest last week there's. some flood you please shut up the space. shuttle. mists. come up. come the. sun. on the. moon

respect. this is why they're from berlin tonight changing the rules for who may and may not cross the border u.s. president donald trump unveils an immigration overhaul the u.s. president wants to favor higher skilled migrants who can speak english like he wants less priority for those with family ties to america but with a divided congress.