president. german foreign minister heiko mass is libya's rebel commander and if i have to agree to a ceasefire following their meeting in benghazi general have to also agree to attend this meeting weekends conference in berlin aimed at ending libya's civil war . russian lawmakers have approved president putin's choice for prime minister the former head of the federal tax of us mikhail misused and was confirmed just a day after the surprise resignation of the entire russian government that followed mr putin's announcement of reforms that people speculate could extend his grip on power. germany's parliament has rejected controversial legislation aimed at helping people who need organ donations the proposal would have assumed the consent of people to their organs being transplanted after death unless they signed a declaration stating otherwise. this is news from berlin for more follow us on

twitter at the news of that our web site w dot com. 100 u.s. senators today took an oath to think and seen not as political animals but rather as physicians compelled by the constitution to deliver a diagnosis tonight the impeachment trial of u.s. president has begun and when it ends the verdict will tell the nation and the world whether or not the president has become a cancer on the body politic of america i'm burnt off in berlin this is the day. the hour 12 noon having arrived in the proceedings. certainly a piece. from those of the united states. article one. of you suppose. article 2 obstruction of congress. the gravity of these

charges is self-evident to anyone who is not self interest the house's power. is over. the senate. is. also coming up tonight is the russian president preparing his country for a change which guarantees more of the same will it be a 3rd decade of putin power these many and so busy hideouts and things will change with his own this is a bully thank you maybe in more civilized countries all states when this kind of thing happens people expect change and for things to get back. to the noise here. to our viewers on p.b.s. in the united states and all around the world welcome we begin the day with the beginning of the impeachment trial of u.s. president donald trump and the u.s.

constitution's clauses for impeachment in a trial are considered an emergency brake if you will congress taking extreme action to stop a president whose actions are deemed possibly criminal and dangerous now that is one outcome the other a verdict that exonerates the executive well as the trial began today a bombshell announcement came from a u.s. government watchdog the government accountability office saying that the trumpet ministration broke the wall when it withheld millions in aid earmarked for ukraine and that is precisely the claim which triggered impeachment proceedings against the president this could possibly add to the evidence against mr trump but tonight we still do not know if the senate will allow new evidence or witnessed testimony in this trial. sir can there be a fair trial without witnesses yeah the same witnesses they're saying they need today were available in the house you know when you if you want to witness and

witness was available to chose not to call them don't blame me they don't want to see documents they don't want to hear from eyewitnesses they don't want they want to ignore anything new that comes out what kind of trial is this going to be to talk about that i'm joined tonight by brett broom he is president of the consulting firm the global situation room he joins me from new york city it's good to have you on the day bret you know this report that we got today from the government office of accountability when you add that to these new accusations coming from an associate of giuliani the president's personal attorney about ukraine i mean all of this appears and sounds very damning for the president's case but will it matter at all if this stuff is not admitted it is evidence in this trial. well i think it got pretty darn difficult now for senate majority leader mitch mcconnell lindsey graham who you just heard from there and other republicans to stonewall i mean what

you saw last night on american television was someone who was very close both to rudy giuliani the president's personal attorney as well as to the president himself and he pointed the finger at both of them and rather direct and then on top of that this morning it only got worse because this independent u.s. government bodies said pretty darn clearly the president broke the law because the president ordered this aide to be stopped in what does that mean this is this report by the g.a.o. way saying that the president broke the law i mean it's clear to me and the same we have no doubt the evidence is there the evidence that anyone can check see and read shows is that the president the trumpet ministration broke the law with ukraine when you have a report out like that then how is it not going to influence the outcome of

this trial. so here is why it is so significant for the whole time when testimony and the proceedings in the house of representatives were taking place the republicans case was predicated on the notion that yes it was unseemly for the president to be asking for personal or political favors but it didn't break the law now you have what for foreign viewers i think is really important to understand the u.s. government accountability office as the name suggests is a really important body here this is not a minor and to d. or agency so for them to say that carries a lot of weight. the $100.00 u.s. senators today they took an oath of impartiality which demands that they act in this trial is jurors and not as lawmakers not as political animals which which they are if they weren't they would even be sitting in congress is it almost

a superhero task to ask lawmakers to do that is it even possible do you think. well i don't think there's anyone including the founders of our country who believed that this process was going to be devoid of politics it is ultimately a political decision but that said the republicans run the risk here of trying to hold almost a kangaroo court where they quickly move past evidence they quickly try to block witnesses and that could be damaging for them on a political basis because many of these republican senators are up for reelection and let's remember it only takes who are for at least the rules to change and the question of removing a president here in the u.s. will require that supermajority of the senate i don't know that we get there but nonetheless procedurally the votes could be there for witnesses and other evidence

to be heard you know i mean let's talk about that what about if we don't get there the constitution is for our for our viewers they see what's happening right now as an example of a constitution the world's oldest that is functioning you have what the constitution says must be done when you have suspicions of high crimes and misdemeanors i mean it's following the path that it should but what happens in a hyper polarized political environment when the senate is unable to fulfill its role as an impartial jury. well there are several points that i would make for viewers in germany and around the world the 1st is that despite the appearance of difficulties and the damage our institutions have suffered of the last few years i do think we're seeing evidence of this system functioning as intended the senate the house of representatives our legislative entities are conducting war oversight

than they ever did before and there is an effect on the operation of the administration even if the president isn't removed these are life firing warning shots across the power of a vote with titian only i think we're seeing as the judicial institutions function both as a result of some of the evidence that's uncovered here and then lastly i would say i think the press and the 4th estate as we call it here in the u.s. is becoming much more robust much more vigorous in some of their reporting investigations as a result of this process and we know that for our colleagues in the united states and in washington particularly it's very difficult to do their job especially when there are no white house press briefings being held any more let's look forward though let's assume the math is in favor for the president and he is acquitted here there is no conviction and then we move towards election day in the member what

will a lack of a conviction in this trial do to the credibility of the election in november. well i think 1st you're going to see that republican senators will have to not only vote but voice their support for what clearly were questionable acts by the president and that could have political consequences secondly there's a lot of evidence that's being laid out here which will provide fodder for both the presidential election i think whoever comes out as the nominee of the democratic party will certainly use of the material the statements the evidence here but also for the house of representatives elections or state and local elections in the u.s. you could really see of blue wave that comes as a result of americans just being fed up with this kind of governance you know that is definitely a big risk with this trial joining us tonight with the consulting firm the global

situation room but we appreciate your insights tonight thank you good to be with you. yesterday russia's government resigned in mount's today president russian president putin began naming replacements what most people would expect to be a political crisis is being treated like business as usual in moscow almost today putin named a former tax technocrat to be the country's new prime minister but insiders say that putin's decisions mean more than meets the eye they say he's grooming political moscow to make room for another decade of putin power. he's little known even within russia now. formally the head of the country's tax service has become russia's prime minister there are some lawmakers overwhelmingly backed russian president vladimir putin's candidate for the job to no one's

surprise addressing the duma misused and promised change. the president has stressed several times people should already now be feeling real changes for the better so far this is happening far from everywhere. it's a rapid rise for the career bureaucrat elevated to the country's number 2 position less than 24 hours after russia's government resigned that paves the way for putting his newly announced sweeping constitutional changes there are mixed reactions over whether the political shake up will make any difference because there's a card to stay after the political system was stagnant people want something new now new decision some kind of renewal i think president putin made the right decision when he shook everything up. you know yup i don't know but i trust putin to make the right decisions good on him but at the shop there's many doubts and i think will change. maybe in more civilized countries or states when this kind of

thing happens people expect change and for things to get back. to the noise here it is a 1000000 of other sort of moses. critics say misuse tin is merely a placeholder for putting who they believe has no intention of relinquishing power when his presidential term ends in 2024 but russia's political elites are still pondering what role putin has in mind for himself. what is vladimir putin up to talk about and i'm joined now by d.w. russia analyst constantine fund and he joins us tonight be a scott constantine it's good to see you again is so when you look at the actions of the russian president right now what is he doing is he will putting a new foundation down for 10 more years of putin power. well 1st of all you mentioned that people expected a political crisis but that combi any political process in the place where there is no politics where politics is conducted by one minute so yes there is no crisis and

mr putin has chosen this unknown technocrats for one simple reason as he approaches 2024. when that he supposed to step down as president of poland as what is going to do next and how he did it what he needs he needs a deflection of attention from growing economic and social problems in the country to give you just one thing that a real disposable income is officially have been pulling for 5 years in a row so putin is decided to get rid of this over centralized system in which he's responsible for everything and make the government and the duma much more let's say responsible for the at least notional responsible essentially to make them a punching bag so we can boys for the growing for the uneasy public opinion that we have in russia and the to liberate mr putin from this dependence said to let him do

other things he likes and enjoys like foreign policy and you know playing power politics around the globe and lecturing people on history that's what he wants to do he doesn't want to be seen as someone who's responsible for what really touches people's lives when you're talking about a politician who is thinking about his legacy i've heard some commentators say that mr putin can't afford to live long enough to see that legacy that he has to find a way just stay in power connected to power because once he leaves the forces that are against him will become so dangerous that his his life will be threatened when he's no longer in politics do you agree with that. well predictions there and grateful business but let me put it like that i generally agree i think that the put in the system is very much based on one man and when put in. the system will challenge it will be

a different system maybe which was maybe much better but it will not be able to system and he knows it i think he's made since and he wants to really staying in control for as long as possible and for that we'll see this constitutional reform which is a number 2 item on the moscow agenda today i think it's although it's called course usually reform in fact it's going to be a very thorough rewriting of the current rules all the time a possible political game in moscow you know that to secure or that puts a little control person that changes this so-called seal of the key i.e. the army the f. is b. and the police force is until the very very end until if you really decide to with the political scene and what it is also supposed to ensure is that people are me chief coordinator and chief all that up inside the russian elite whether he will succeed. in this that remains to be seen because what we've seen recently according

to independent public opinion polls in moscow sorry in russia is that people just start getting weary of this whole setup and this essentially costs make the change which is designed to prolong the power of one man over russia may well where thin much sooner then we can imagine well yeah you speak to an important point here i mean when will people become fed up with vladimir putin that he has been their leader for almost all of this century and we're talking about him being connected to power of maybe up until the year 2030 i mean he likes to is talk about democracy and give lip service to that but someone being in power 30 years in a democracy that that can't be healthy any way you look at. well if i had such powers of prediction i would have been winning bets in a 10000 bucks every day i don't but definitely you're ross i think that the.

this is a problem geisha of the same thing as the french say you know if you such are sluice elementary. it's something that usually undermines such systems and basically i'd like to suggest that we compare it to what happened to 2 regimes authoritarian regimes and they didn't denise in the last century some of us are in portugal didn't think about change didn't think about succession didn't think about basically what happens in the future and his system collapsed in a military coup francisco franklin spain's not a thinking about succession and change set to yes before he died and look most of the franco is people remains pretty cool and although this is them did change this was a much better and much smoother result so kind of make a pick yeah lemmie putin as russia's franco when we will see the w. russia analyst constantine from acre joining us tonight to talk about a president who apparently is not going anywhere constantly thank you thank you.

almost 2 decades in power the image of marigold is just as much that of a diplomat and a stateswoman as it is of a politician but it will not be that way forever miracle plans to step down next year when her current term ends her policy decisions now they're being watched and weighed just as much as they've always been in an interview with the financial times she speaks candidly about relations with the u.s. and china and she says that washington's warnings about china should not be a warning for germany's dealings with china now merkel is quoted as saying i would advise against regarding china as a threat simply because it is economically successful and then she goes on to say that's bull that right there do we in germany and europe want to dismantle all interconnected global supply chains because of this economic

competition in my opinion complete isolation from china cannot be the answer aren't so what is the answer let's bring in now our political correspondent simon young he's here in berlin good evening to you simon the u.s. we know considers china particularly the chinese tech giant who way to be a national security threat and so do many people in the coalition government right here in germany yet the german chancellor angela merkel she refuses to say no to allowing who way to come in do business here in germany what is her reasoning for that. well i think anglo medical calling to be suspicious of the motives of some of those who raise concerns about why way and of a successful chinese companies you hear that in the scenes of un she says that

china is not a threat simply because it's successful and she'll say interestingly drew a comparison between the economic rise of china and that of germany she said that the chinese you know economics says these laws leave based on khalid work and technical skill and creativity so i think she is inclined to suspect that there is isolationism and protectionism behind behind that sort of challenge in the case of wildlife instance another point in this case i think he's also the concerns of germany's telecoms providers all the german telecoms operator is a customer of huawei and they've been warning that if you ban that chinese company you know that's going to add billions of euros to the cost and many years to the time that it'll take to roll out the 5 g.

network for instance you know i mean this is a case where we are seeing economic policy colliding with national security policy so i mean you've covered the chancellor for a long time what do you think the chances are that miracle will change her mind about you know the risk assessment of who way. well i think she's always ready to listen and indeed she's been holding meetings today with senior members of our own party many of whom are very alarmed by the security considerations and i mean it's worth noting that just today there have been stories of police raids here in germany and also elsewhere in europe people said to be spying on behalf of way and the chinese so these are all real concerns i'm sure the chancellor is listening to that but she says you know let's

not focus on china soli let's not exclude one company per se let's remain open and she also for instance put some faith in regulation talking about the infamous general data protection regulation here in the you saying that's the way to keep people's data safe so this is the kind of measure the price he'd expect from talk to you know and so on we've got about 30 seconds left here let me ask you how much of merkel stance is about not sharing its stance with donald trump if trump is voted out of office and of amber for example do you think that a different leader in the white house would make it easier for merrill the change your mind. well i think there's no doubt that a lot of people here in berlin see trump's america 1st approach as a kind of hyper protectionism at least potentially and they're worried about that but mccool i think sees opportunities as well she says you know if if this is the american century as

a president obama called it rather the asian century is century europe has become less important that means we've got to do things like step up the manufacturing of key technologies like batteries and computer chips and other things in other words she's looking to the future for what europe's response can be to those the protectionist challenges our political correspondent simon young simon thank you. germany's parliament has rejected controversial legislation aimed at helping people who need organ donations the new opt out law would have the sumed that people agreed to have their organs transplanted after death unless they had signed a declaration saying otherwise the german government is looking for ways to increase the supply of organ donors as the country has europe's lowest their nation raked. function his job as a business consultant kept him on the road but then he was diagnosed with genetic

lung disease he fought to stay healthy as long as he could but it became clear his health depended on getting a donated long. yeah it's that when i 1st spoke to the doctors and they told me i needed a lung transplant if i was shot. it's my long and i would have preferred to live the rest of my life with my own along. having someone else's lung was a concept he would have to get used to. or just a few more examinations than his name could go on the waiting list for donor like function you know there are around 1500 people in germany who are waiting for lifesaving organs to be donated and many of them have been waiting for us. does believe the problem is dramatic in all of europe germany has the lowest number of organ donors the longest waiting lists and the highest number of patients whose lives are in danger if they do not receive an organ donation or gone because. all

believe this is the case even though more than 80 percent of germans a positive organ donations according to doctors one problem is that death and organ donation are to many families people simply don't talk about it and if it's not clear what the deceased would have wanted most relatives decided against organ donation or even one of patients wants to donate an organ often the donation doesn't take place so organs cannot be transplanted and presents on the waiting list die. and that was the case 900 times in 2018. or the days almost on the conversation continues online to find this on twitter you can follow me a t.v. and remember whatever happens between now and then tomorrow is another day will see of that everybody.

conflicts with sebastian. junger's recent celebrations for his 70th anniversary weren't quite the public relations triumph it was supposed to be margaret's this week here in london is a very good golfer how does he justify china's comes along. of human rights abuses out of a continuing pressure on hong kong the 1st conflicts of next on de gallo for.

me take it personally i'd already with all the wonderful people in stories that make the game so special. for all true fans. come by to. pick up more than football online story so that people who multo for the information they provide. the means they want to express d.w. on facebook twitter and up to date in touch follow us and. indeed of climate change. comes from a decision. much nice to.

cut what ideas do they have of their future. cut. d.w. dot com traffic can make a city the multimedia. click the target. look china have its old walls what you've read about the minds most the people all the training comes all the training hard for my feet is a little less than traditional kind of it is not all law and all that very much at stake in hong kong china is recent celebrations for its 70th anniversary one quite good public relations triumph it was supposed to be not with continuing protests in hong kong and fresh revelations about human rights abuses in michigan jack reacher the from our guest this week here in london is victor gao of the chinese docket.