these are. things to come people understood and as a way of shaping society. with. alice world 3 part documentary starts made w. . this was a real operation that it was not authorized we still don't know what happened to the remains just. how is that possible we don't have a history of a good sort of 16 months have gone by since the saudi journalist jamal khashoggi was killed by agents of his own state is the ball but the issue doesn't go away my guest this week here at the munich security conference is. the saudi minister of state for foreign affairs why are there still so many unanswered questions about the murder and why the massive crackdown on human rights activists inside saudi

arabia. and the larger bare welcome to complex or nice to be here it's around 16 months since agents of your state to murder jamal khashoggi and in cold blood in your consulate in istanbul what's striking in retrospect is that 3 days later your crown prince mohammed bin told the turkish authorities to search the consulate and added we have nothing to hide a remarkable statement because in fact the last 16 months have been full of aspects of this case that you have hidden right from the start and going on hiding the truth i don't believe so we have said that this was an old operation that it was not authorized we have investigated the people who were part of this operation charges were leveled against 11 of them 5 of them were facing the death penalty of

the trial began in january the trial was attended by representatives of the permanent 5 countries and on the security council plus 3 people would like to talk i'd like to talk about the trial but but but straight away after the event there's just take that expensive offer from the crown prince to search your concert was another. 10 days before turkish investigators were actually loud into the building why so long if you had nothing to hide it's a technical person but i understand that there are situations where countries have to agree on the mechanics and the modalities of how you want people to enter sovereign territory you have to agree on the equipment you have to agree on the scope and you have to agree no country would allow another country full access to a diplomatic facility that is doesn't happen the un special rapporteur i discover more didn't see it that way she found credible evidence pointing to the crime scene as having been thoroughly even forensically clean these indicate she said the saudi investigation was not carried out in good faith and that it may amount to obstruct the justice that was kind of i did not have

a mandate for this she relied on sources from the newspapers on leaks to the media she did not she didn't have any experts in forensics and other issues but it's a safe assumption isn't it you clean up the crime scene immediately you're hiding something up a safe assumption the issue with agnes keller virus you vote you have report based on to some fords and then she'll. be proven started look at her record when it comes to surgery before a number of years and how disparaging of her negatives she has been against how do you well a lot of people are disparaging these days about saudi arabia because we're human rights record and i take this i take exception with this so grevious made great progress in terms of human rights early because you could make great progress in terms of reform in terms of empowering women in terms of empowering youth in terms of motion of the site in terms of diversifying our economy in terms of reducing our reliance on oil 30 a bit is moving very very quickly in a very positive direction under the guidance and direction of the camp and we'll come onto the details of that and i want to take you up on that but the list of

unanswered questions about the murder itself is extensive in that we still don't know what happened to the remains of mr kushner how is that possible when you are allegedly have all the criminals involved behind bars how do you know how do you not know they have said that they had a local collaborator. who disposed of the body where's it i don't know i mean didn't you interest game designers i am not the public prosecutor we do foreign policy we don't look for him and best acacias you have console you are behind as larry king of the state telling you what we did and what we did is what every other country did the united states said in iraq please don't tell everybody the us i am talking about the us committed outrageous crimes did the president authorize it and it was scrutiny of his the commander the same way your being scrutinized yes and what they did is they investigated they helped people accountable they put in place mechanisms to prevent that from happening that's what governments who was this so-called cooperate so who knows took away the body i don't want to remain i don't

know we don't have a history of murdering our citizens but if you're a story as you claim to be over this incident why haven't you found out this information is a matter of urgency and told us to question his family because that was a few momentary ingestion we had sent a number of legal documents to the turkish authorities asking for information and we have not received anything except one you haven't told us either who you think masterminded this murder surely the trial must have shown up at all so that it was it was a mistake people exceeded their authorities and this happened the people who committed of a grave did not do it under the authority of the president or the vice president or the secretary of defense the u.s. government isn't buying your version of events is that the cia has let it be known in briefings that it has medium to high confidence that it was your crown prince mahmud been someone who ordered the killing we don't see it this way the president and the secretary of state have said this is not the case the largest intelligence agency in the world unmatched resources you tell me they're talking nonsense i can only tell you what the us president who is the commander in chief of the u.s.

armed forces and what the structure of state have said publicly. but hey if it was nonsense how do you explain the phone conversation intercepted by us by agencies in 2017 in which the crown prince told a top aide he'd use a bullet all because shoghi didn't stop his criticism i don't know anything about this and i can't comment about something that appears in newspapers based anonymous sources even if those anonymous sources are attributed to intelligence agencies the un acknowledges that it's been an important step this trial towards accountability but says it's failed to meet procedural and substantive standards so are being held to hold where you are and those who are in the u.s. so the report from the from the special rapporteur the special muslim girl is biased special robot or white because excluded agree with exceeded her authority the special of what or says the trial was secret how can a trial be secret when we have representatives from the 5 permanent members of the security council plus turkey going to trial who's held behind closed doors the

identity of those charged has not been released nor the identity of those facing the death penalty why the decision of opening up a trial or not rests with the judge and if the judge does not want to have a courtroom that looks like a circuit it's his prerogative to close the trial now the representative from the other countries who are there have access to all the proceedings and they know the names of the people why should why were they told not to speak about it because we want to make sure that when the trial is over and charges are leveled the punishment is announced and people can see it you cannot accuse somebody who turns out to be innocent and then in the end they lose face society shall assume they've been sentenced to death not all of them 50 there will be incentives to learn one of them have been investigated and i believe 10 or 11 have been charged 5 have been sentenced to death why can't we know their names you look at the jurors the verdict on them because the trial is not over there's going to be an appeal and there and it has to be reviewed by the supreme court this is how awkward systems work. let's

deal with the final explanation that you and others in. this government would have us believe that it was some other rogue operation this team of high level operatives some of whom had in the past travelled with the crown prince decided they just had to go and kill was the question of the day they went out on a limb like that i believe they want to talk to him and they want to convince him to come back to service something went terribly wrong and an altercation happened and he was murdered they went with an autopsy expert who had a bomb soon and with i don't know about that i don't know about everybody else and i don't know where those are but he says i don't know about that the idea with that is that this was authorized as ridiculous this was a rogue operation that happened that should not have happened we're going to be paying a great price for it it's a terrible tragedy and the issue is we deal with it from with legal perspective jim our family has come out and said we have confidence in the saudi judicial system but there is a comedy that's most affected by the exposed as

a story in saudi arabia but but but but your but your agents didn't bother to hide what they did didn't bother to disguise their actions at all one of them according to transcripts of their bug conversation was talking into a telephone immediately after the murder saying tell you was the thing is done it's done who is he turns out this is not correct i don't believe the 6 correct i don't know this is this was from leaks i haven't seen that intercepts that the turks had but if turkey had all of this information why didn't they provided to the market shortly before he went to the consulate if they believe this is the case if you are insisting that it's a broker operation answer me one question why were the people who were involved who didn't sneak in by night and sneak out again they came in private jets with diplomatic passports checking into they left a trail everywhere they left a trail everywhere so by monitoring him. assuming they weren't authorized to do it

they were signing their own death was what rogue that's what rogue operatives would do that that's why they're facing a number of them are facing the death penalty and others are facing not and why why would they do that what's the motive for writing your own death sentence i don't know i think they went into talk to him they went in to try to convince him to come back something went terribly wrong and he was killed and they are being on trial now and a number of them are facing that they want to know that actually is that they fully intended to kill him otherwise why do you take it all obviously you're hoping to assume why do you have to assume the worst when it comes to saudi arabia operations gone wrong this is authority has been too how good is assuming the worst grade worst how abu ghraib was pretty bad and they got a lot of bad publicity for it but with we're not talking about a month i said mr ford and we're dealing with it that we're putting people on trial and we will be punishing them one of the key questions that keeps returning is

whether the crown prince created an environment which allowed his agents to behave in the way they did in istanbul or you would tell me that's not true wouldn't you of course not the campus is a driving force behind change in her view because the driving force behind empowering women and men and gave her youth has the driving force behind economic opening and economic reform and of increasing repression against those who dare think and act in an independent fashion i disagree with that history driving force behind entertainment and recreation in saudi arabia he's the driving force behind technology in investments in technology and surgery he said driving force for setting surgery of up to be the leading country in the 21st century mr knowledgeable in march 27th in u.s. officials with access to classified intelligence reports told the new york times that your crown prince had authorized a secret campaign to silence dissenters that included surveillance kidnapping. tensional torture so-called rapid intervention team i'm not going to comment on

news reports attributed to anonymous sources some came from saudi officials as well anonymous sources seems there was a standing order to saudi intelligence to bring dissidents phone animists sources i cannot comment on anonymous source or so about one of them who was brought home now off our she'd a poet in 2018 he was on a trip to kuwait stopped at the airport forcibly returned to serbia arabia i don't have the details of this he was held incommunicado for 12 months later out of anything i don't have the details on this case no saudi citizen is actually safe if they speak out against your government that's correct people come and see the king in his majesty the crown prince and his majesty communicate with them they told them what they think they express criticism they provide ideas they provide suggestions this is what surgery be has been for centuries amnesty international said last year that virtually all saudi arabian human rights defenders and independent voices male and female are behind bars serving lengthy sentences handed

down by your specialized criminal court most were prosecuted they said for their peaceful human rights work and calls for reforms i'll take issue with other countries on a major path to reform and anybody who calls for reform is part of that process why would we have reforms in saudi arabia and that could such people call for the point there are other issues that people have been charged with and have been sentenced with and i believe that the reports that we get another very accurate really and so when you do and if you have any issue with the terms of the legal issues you should really address them to the public prosecution last year they also quoted a saudi lawyer i g. who has represented many defendants before your specialized criminal court he said on the record the presumption of innocence is not part of the saudi arabian judicial system pledging words on that i disagree with as has. and the presumption is always innocent until proven guilty when he says the opposite he has defended

many people before you i thought unlike the positions of some of the ngos who assumed that. before without presuming that it's innocent we are guilty before the case was over so everybody has missed everybody who reports this massive crackdown or the massive crackdown on grip on the dissidents people we have the human rights groups the international human rights groups that all wrong i will give any examples i will not i will give you an example and you tell me if i support chrissy in the 1990 s. we had radical preachers who were calling for jihad and. you just want to take us in all different directions you moved us from the structure so a long way to finish i want to point out the folks in the 1990 s. we were criticized for having radical preachers and preaching hate. when we detained them we were criticized for taking away their freedom of speech it's

a damned if you do damned if you do situation if you don't situation do you want them to preach hate or do you want them to stop you can't have it both ways that's the park which is perfect mr larger back in march last year 36 countries you know this shooter joint statement expressing particular concern about your use of cold terror legislation against individuals peacefully exercising their rights and freedom 36 countries germany france u.k. spain italy australia and they also misjudge the situation in your country yet you seem to be badly misunderstood by some of the most expert biggest experts in the world yes they are really not about happen i double they know so little that they shouldn't be need to be more educated than we have been fighting terrorists as scarce is it credible is it i mean you can sit here and say that but that's insulting to their intel he says have laws and there is a line between freedom of expression and incitement and murder and we have laws in our country we have

a court system and people have to obey the laws and the courts and sundry by the ones who are due to keep these cases and all with else was to push back to n.g.o.s and offer him by talk of stations and virtually every human rights activist is sitting in jail snottery. why would they make it up do they make up think the sun is really into nothingness if we think that the past what did they last may we are charged with detaining women for asking for the right to drive that's not true why would you detain somebody for asking for a rate that the king already us why would you because chinese do those as you did because that's not the childishness you do they may not be the charge but that's a very good one isn't it no that's the wrong perception they were involved with foreign governments trying to recruit people and sensitive positions in court or to taint sensitive documents to be used by evidence that's called espionage and the prosecution when the trials are over one percent the evidence you can call it what

you libel you saying they were actually a threat to the saudis say it seems to be yes that is that really that's what the prosecution is saying i don't have access to the courts i can only go by what the entity in saudi arabia that's charged with filing charges and that's charged with prosecuting people in terms of trials and that's their position and they have been public about it last month mr you address the european parliament in brussels and you strongly objected to the scrutiny and criticism that has come your way from any peace if you object to that so much why sign up to international agreements which involve other countries monitoring your compliance or do you just. except it only when it's in your favor do you mean monitoring or compliance monitoring compliance with agreements you've saw and touches such as. torture for instance we know you're supposed to have outlawed torture but there are means accusations that torture is

practiced and they can bring the neurosis they can bring the charges to a court and so people the court would review wouldn't reinvestigated you tell the parliament stop criticizing our causes we are a sovereign nation that refuses to be pattern yes member of the united nations you are there for you scrutiny we do not criticize other countries legal systems and we will not allow other countries to criticize our legal system if you don't want that kind of attention then go abroad kidnapping your own people forcing them to go back to your country this is the legal system the legal process the boats not the they do when they promise to subhumans down here arabia does not. accept people criticizing our legal system we have not criticized the u.k. or france or germany or sweden where you are perfectly at liberty to we don't because you want to look this is your system we have not criticized how people in europe treat minorities or immigrants we have not criticized europe or

a terrific past when it came to massive crimes against humanity we don't do this. and we will not accept criticism of our legal system by others but if you go on doing these things how can you expect your expensive charm offensive to call on anything but deaf ears all the money you paid for p.r. companies expensive b r companies in washington d.c. where you were ambassador falls on deaf ears doesn't it we don't have an expensive charm offensive we have public relations companies like other countries too and the amounts are not outrageous the amounts of normal we present our case to people and we have people come and visit and we teach with people in dialogue for that they can see what side here is about we have seen foreign investment and surgery bago up we have seen foreign visitors so typical up we have seen foreign entrepreneurs come to suddenly appear to set up shop but we all are not buying your message i'm totally with you protecting human rights some telling you this is these are the facts. there is unanimity among the human rights organizations around the world but

you are in the middle of a massive repression of human who disagree with that i know you can disagree with they think it's their business we disagree with that our people our economy is doing well our country is attracting foreign as something to do with you says of saudi arabia was nobody would come why would companies invest go they're always going to do business who always come i wish why you know that i would entrepreneurs come and set up shop and so because they can make money that's it's nothing it's nothing to do that you see when i disagree busy i think i'm doing i think your mind is made up and you don't want to see the facts come to said you can see from the sunday talk you told the parliament stop lecturing and start working with us we have a court system the court system is and by that we don't allow anyone to question just what you just what you said to me how do you suggest europe works with you when you slam the door in its face like better. in what sense land i started lecturing and start with yes we will not accept lectures so a lecture is

a lecture telling you the results a lecture a bit said on you the results so that their research is a lecture based on lack of information of the saudi legal system and how it works it's a lecture based on information that they obtained either through hearsay or through inaccurate sources government agencies which once 36 countries that expressed their concern to you i thought i'd give you the details then there were other a large number of countries that are for the resolution counter to the us and those 36 countries were absolutely wrong well absolutely mistaken how could they get it so wrong they've been going to your country for years talking to your people for years it beggars belief that you can put up this smokescreen and expect that viewpoint going to believe and imo you should bear you can believe whatever you want but salad replace a country that is on a path of reform broadening our economy we are diversifying our economy from oil we are opening up new areas for investment we are empowering nobody worries and

elementary level one of those are going to uncover them to lety we are creating opportunity for our young people 70 percent of scientists under the age of $7030.00 they have hopes dreams and ambitions and the government's objective is to provide them with the ability to realize who gives you keeps you keep saying this my question is why should your work with a country that completely trashes its values and rights that are central to europe's foundation because i believe that that assessment is wrong and i'm going where with the starting point b. i believe that that is wrong 60 years ago we didn't have schools for girls today 55 percent of women of college students of them. 80 years ago life expectancy in surgery was 37 years old ok i ask where where do you see it it's where you serve today it's in the in the mid seventy's at the level of you where do you start when in the view of major countries around the world new human rights organizations you have so little respect for the sick human right i don't i don't buy those are changed their mind i don't buy that assessment you spoke at the parliament you told

them your view they're not buying it just another bit of i'm not buying their view either major countries are not buying their view either so when they start there's no starting point is a look at if you look at education if you look at health care if you look at clayton we're not looking in to the humor at all i can lose you i don't use all human rights if you look at media what people want is health care to them if they're in jail for years without charges past we have more than 20000000 saudis are they all in jail nobody said they were in jail you're telling me they're all in jail i did i said human rights. activists are in jail you see them and act as activists we don't does as i understand said hardly any of the we don't see them as like any of them are not behind bars with all due respect i stick to national we have a court system we have the public prosecution to projects against them the courts will adjudicate these cases and if they will listen to what people used

a little guilty they were punished it's a surprise that and with all due respect amnesty international their opinion does they say that the trials are inherently unfair it doesn't matter because it informs public opinion and public opinion around the world as you know it was not exactly trusting what goes on in saudi arabia do you think playboy the south side of human rights organizations who give accurate information about every country in the world or a state that has everything to lose if it admits to these human rights abuses i disagree with those willingness are going to believe i think that we have great relations with them with a large number of countries we have the presidency of the g 20 we're doing a lot of major projects and sadly we're doing a lot of reforms and so we're improving the standard of living of our people we're becoming part of the global so what are you saying you don't care about what people think about your human rice say we don't have the problem with human rights we have a legal system we have laws that people have to behave if they don't obey those

laws they will be charges filed against them and they would have to face the courts very simple in the united kingdom the same thing would happen if somebody violates the law what do you do do i come to you and tell you this person was engaged in human rights when they killed somebody or when they spied for somebody or when they were not talking and go you know it's a kingdom you're not talking you would like to talk you know about every country except saudi arabia it's not true i'm giving you an example because i believe you have not been fair in your views of such behavior and in the positions you're my views these are the views that are going to it in the extensively questions that you've articulated. and i want to be able to show you that this is the 1st universal issue here when you have a law the last few but if you don't like the law change it ok but as long as it's on the books you have to obey it thank you very much for being a coffee. thank

. you. nice to me. i am not too dumb to complain and venus on the secrets of mine made kids. not dumb to believe the answers tongue and so on t.w. .

to know that 77 percent of blocking are younger than 6 o'clock. that's me and me and you. don't know what time of course is 100. 77 percent to talk about the issues. for almost all of the flashes from housing boom boom boom time this is where. welcome to the 77 percent. this weekend g.w. . the global corona crisis you can find more information online at the

w dot com don t w social media channels. every day is for us and for our planet. pluto why do so is on its way to bring you more conservation above how do we make seduced greener how can we protect animals and their habitats and what to do with the waste. we can make a difference by choosing reforestation over the forest should resign. for disposable smart new solutions for oberstein said you know. who's truly unique and we know that their uniqueness is what allows us to live and survive but why do you assume the apartment to shoot to global 3000 on t.w. and i don't blame. but.

last. place. this is g.w. news live from berlin and fighting for every life in one of germany's coronavirus hot spots no german state has been hit worse than the varia medical workers soldier on through supply shortages and the risk of falling sick themselves. also coming up could the pandemic prompt and enter the war in yemen saudi arabia calls a truce and signals peace talks could be on the table.