compared to the spring, it will be a us masters, like note of that it will be that's it. you're up to date. next up is our coverage. 19 special. i'll be back with more news headlines at the top of the hour. if you can't wait until then remember, you can get all the latest news and information around the clock on our website at www. dot. com. thanks for watching. the fight against the corona virus pandemic has the rate of infection been developing. what does the latest research say? information and context. the coronavirus update. 19 special on t.w. . and you hear me now. here's, here's we're going to review in how last year's german chancellor will bring you. i'm going to a math course as you've never tired to have before surprise yourself with what is

possible, who is manacled really, what moves. and also who talks to people who follows her along the way, admirers and critics alike. how is the world's most powerful woman shaping her legacy? joining us from eccles last stop in the race for a coronavirus vaccine is not just a matter of saving lives. it's also a matter of saving face for some world leaders. as news broke this week, the 2 vaccines have reached 90 percent. if we can see the incentive to speed up trials is growing. russia and china are already rolling out their back scenes to the public before final testing. is that safe? what if you could see rate is high enough level of scientific says acceptable

separating fact from fiction is challenging. it's becoming like a bidding war 1st, the it success of 90 percent reporting the same figure for its 1st candidate that was monday. then the vaccine is actually 90 percent effective, protecting people from it. it's raising eyebrows among skeptics. but it's also raising hopes that we'll have a vaccine by the end of the year. and the president vladimir putin says russia is registering its 3rd vaccine against the coronavirus and insists all of them are effective. the scientific community doesn't agree and believes starting mass in occupations is risky. the cameras are waiting.

they've been promised a celebrity who's ready to be filmed, being given the russian vaccine. sputnik 5 enter, blogger and bodybuilder, alexander spock. the eccentric social media star takes one last selfie before he's injected with a dose of the still unproven vaccine. and you can hear no one had to talk me into doing it. it's always good to be the 1st at something. i always have a negative view of vaccinations, but this is different for the doctors will keep an eye on alexander for the next 6 months to observe the effects of sputnik 5 the russian bloggers enthusiastic to be part of the program and like so many other people he just wants life to get back to how it was, even on a ship, which is normally i travel a lot. i want to work normally to move around. normally. i don't like the masks now,

i can get all the medical treatments and be one of the 1st to be really free. when washed off international criticism, russia rushed forward in the global race for a coronavirus vaccine. back in august, sputnik 5 became the world's 1st registered vaccine. but critically that was before the results of the all important phase 3 trials were published. president vladimir putin is eager to be the man who presents the world with an effective vaccine that would come with guaranteed prestige. and of course profit. in mid october, he made another announcement to novosibirsk base vector center has registered a 2nd russian corona virus vaccine. without doubt,

it's an important success that you, dear friends, have achieved was issued in. meanwhile, alexander spock waits to hear whether sputnik 5 has provided him with antibodies or, not. joins us from the f.a.a., the association of research based pharmaceutical companies. all of these vaccines, although many of them now are sounding more and more promising. so when final testing is over, when, oh, how does production go ahead? well, the production has already started. most companies have produced components of the packs and already at least one company house also reported that they have at least one ready for delivery. and with the components the other companies will be able to have finished products. as soon as i have an approval, well ready for delivery. so, hopes are high,

but of course we have to see the final tests a top army general behind the u.s. vaccine initiative, intice a pace the 1st americans could also start receiving over $1000.00 vaccines next month. what do you think about that? well, the one company that have was the 1st to report positive efficacy results. and they said that they now have to wait full some of days to complete the collection of safety data. they need safety data from at least 2 months after the last shot from all the participants. when they can hand them in their application is complete, then the f.d.a. in the us and the europe can start evaluating the facts. and when they have a positive opinion about it, and when there is an approval,

they can stop. so yes, there is a chance to have approval in december. we rob them all were expected in early january. and as far as production goes, how sufficient would you say the global production capacity actually is? well, some months ago the house being an estimate that there is a global production capacity of something between 2 and 4000000000 doses of covert 19 vaccines that could be produced. that's quite a lot, but obviously it's, we need even mall. so companies have solved it to find more contract manufacturers that produce components for them. and they have also find other companies like license that backs into so that they can produce it as well. e.g. and australia and south africa and japan and so on. so most likely

during 2021, the capacity will even increase. what about the infrastructure? some of these vaccines have to be stored. it is extremely cold temperatures. well, some vaccines indeed need minus 70 degrees. but fortunately, some others that are also very fall in their development, they only need enough rich or 8 or so we hope to hear of positive, i think is the date in the next weeks. and then this could make the situation a bit easier for those who have to organize all the delivery of things. and the w h o has organized the kovacs facility as like call it, that's the kind of an organisation that bias from companies and then

distributes the doses they buy between various countries that have signed in. and they make sure that a lot goes to middle and low, low and middle income countries. so you don't think those developing countries will be left at the back of the queue at the moment, it seems that the industrialized nations will most likely be quicker with having enough for the population. but on the other hand, we also have mechanisms that make sure that low and middle income countries will get there at an increasing share. and for example, companies in india have licenses to mass produce faxon and they have huge capacities when they can deliver. and they have announced that they will deliver it

particularly to low and middle income countries. then they will also have the facts in the need. and also could you give us an idea of how much the vaccine is actually going to cost? well, some companies have mentioned prices, some have already stated that they will have differential prices. so high a price industrial in industrialized countries and a lower price and in low and middle income countries for germany at the pills that the vaccination will be cheaper than the all canary influenza vaccination that people have every year. so the prices are really oriented at the low, and some companies have stated that they will orient their prices at their

cost really at their own manufacturing cost. well, impressive stuff. well, thank you very much for joining us today. from the, if a time to ask derek what he thinks about the latest developments as always on science correspondent is standing by to field your questions on the coronavirus here in south africa, some of us who had been 1000 have experienced memory loss. is there any research on that? cognitive dysfunction is one of the symptoms on the long list of those associated with covert 19 that i think a lot of people really worry about in some patients. infection with the virus can have affects on, on cognition, as well as on the sensory systems that are tied to it, such as the sense of smell. some experience delerium or say they still feel a general sense of confusion or,

or find it difficult to focus. even long after other people who caught the disease might have recovered from it. the range of symptoms even has a name. people are calling it kovac brain, fog and, and memory loss is being regularly reported by people who experience it. a major recent study from the u.k. that looked at the coronavirus and cognition, including some aspects of short term memory. it was pretty disquieting though. it's one that i, i hasten to add, has not yet been through peer review. the scientists behind it compared the results of over 80000, british participants in a nationwide intelligence test, and they correlated bad with data on their coded 19 status. so whether they've been infected and if so, how severe it was. and the researchers found among 1000 patients significant

cognitive deficits, including even months later, especially among those who were hospitalized. but even among those who had muddled their cases, the hope however, is still that those deficits won't prove lasting even fizzling. see it tomorrow. entering the conflict zone between sebastian, britain's prime minister doris johnson is on the 5 once again. not least for members of his own conservative party. my guest this week here in london is one of us' junior m.p.'s, be a mouthful lami elected to parliament 3 years ago. can mr. jones in the whole team's carbon slide, in the opinion polls a move in the party do become conflicts of next to deliver 5 years after the attack on the bottom in paris,

his son was an assassin. and daughter was a victim of their father's, wrote a book together, a lesson in dialogue and tolerance. at a time when his longest terrorists are killing again focus fungurume 60 minutes on t.w. . from the ghetto to parliament to every gun known as bobby why popstars grails against coming up shot pilots the time to shot despite coming from a poor family loves to become president and

he challenges america doesn't bother to look up the credible story of bob. you wind up dead calm starts december 10th on g.w. . well, i say what i found out, we could be 19. the problem is can be 90 days and felt enough for our agree that hindsight is a great thing. but rewriting history isn't a great thing. is it britain's prime minister 1st johnson is under fire once again, not least from members of his own conservative party. i do serious handling of the fans every rexx it and a string of u. turns on keith policy. my guest this week here in london is one of his junior and seems very powerful army elected to parliament 3 years ago. can mr. johnson hold his parents live in the opinion, polls, and vote for the party through?

if it comes to marvel army, welcome to conflict zone. good to be here. i want to look at 1st, the government's handling of the pandemic in recent months. we know that a vaccine now appears imminent, but after a decade of conservative rule, britain was woefully unprepared to deal with this pandemic any pandemic, wasn't it? despite numerous warnings and dress rehearsals, why was your party asleep on the job for so many years? well, i think what we saw with the pandemic was that the vast, vast majority of countries found themselves unprepared for it. and the reason for that, the fundamental reason for that was that the nature of the pandemic wasn't quite what was previously expressed what was previously expected. what was generally

expected by most countries was something that was sampled. lou, i realize it was different, but look at the figures before the coronavirus hit, the u.k. had just 6.6 intensive care beds, power, 100000 people. that's fewer than latvia, fewer than cyprus, half the number that italy had, and about a 5th of german capacity, 5th largest economy in the world, and the provisions for intensive care, what woefully inadequate went there. well, if you're talking about intensive care beds, there is clearly a point around excess capacity, and how much is sensible to maintain avon's know that there were people from the german health system who'd visited the n.h.s. . this is all prepared to talk about how they could manage their capacity more effective. so i think that both of us can learn from each other. indeed, most health systems can reach where you claimed in may that the government had been as decisive and prompt as it could have been in meeting the challenge. but that's

not a widely held view among the government's scientific advisors is that the u.k.'s chief scientific officer patrick vallance admitted that didn't. he said in july, it's clear the outcome has not been good in the u.k. . i think you can be absolutely clear about that. are you now absolutely clear about that? well, the outcome has not been good because many thousands of people died. so anybody says it was the outcome was good, it is wrong, might say, oh it's true in boiling sh committee on the scientific group for emergencies, said if the government had acted a week or 2 earlier, it would have made quite a big difference to the death threat, so the government still can't bring itself to admit that can it? why? well, the truth is that hindsight is a wonderful thing. and the scientific advisors have given a little i thought she just spent for them letting an incredibly difficult job. but they gave different times contradictory advice. i remember when they were saying the masks shouldn't people. now, if i says to wear masks, why did they change the device? not because they're incompetent or said it wrong because we learnt more about the

virus as time went on in the same way that governments and politicians of lance and civil servants have learned more about how to manage this as time went on. and as i said at the beginning, we do need to learn lessons and they survive how we manage our excess capacity with beds, how we manage our stay capacity around testing the best other things. but, you know, this really, really was not a c. in crisis in many respects, hence why the things that we're grappling with in misc, oh, same things all across europe and indeed the world in trying to manage. well, i agree that hindsight is a great thing, but rewriting history isn't a great thing. is it this claim by the government that everybody who needed care was able to get that care? this from the health secretary mount have caught up in july that wasn't backed up by the facts, was it thanks to a sunday times investigation? we now know the system or tree are as tool as it was called, had been devised, which meant that many people over the age of 60 were denied the lifesaving

treatment they needed. there's direct testimony from doctors to back that up. so the truth of the matter is somewhat different to the way the government now portrays it, isn't it? well, that's not my understanding of it. my understanding of it is, of course, in any health care system like a country like united there is a judgment. bake it and of course imes of stress. then there were times when they wanted to not sh people in hospital 1st, long as they otherwise might because of the huge pressure on the health service. but it was the same problems with seeing in lots of countries. this blanket, this blanket version of everybody who needed care was able to get that care is not true. talked to remeasure parama. chairman of the doctors association u.k. said the lect lockdown 1st time around, allowed the infections to spread across the country. more than the health service could come up with stuff. he said, had to tell many critically unwell patients who needed lifesaving treatment that

they would not receive that treatment. that's not the same as everybody who needed care was able to get that care is, has a big difference there. well, of course you've got a lot of people now saying, oh if only the lot i'm going to have a 4 weeks before. when i have a people to get in out of the treatment mustapha lami, there were tonight treatment. they were told the same from the chairman of the british medical association, dr. chan. my course at the same thing. it is manifestly the case. he said that large numbers of patients did not receive the care that they needed. and that's because the health service didn't have the resources can't be clearer than that. can exact opposite of mr. hancock's blanket assurances. well, i don't think anybody tonight is that in june, july of this year, health services under strain. look, i can't hope for every individual case, of course, and some hospitals, they can make very, very difficult decisions around who got treated in one particular way. how quickly

and so on. but i think that the idea that somehow, if only the government had done the blanket lockdown a week earlier, and none of these problems would have occurred, i think is wrong. also, when i look at other countries, yes, some countries went into lockdown or they may have a live concert just later in the year at a time when the united kingdom didn't have it. there's a basic issue of trust. here's the if you can't trust the government to admit to mistakes or failures, then you certainly can't trust it to learn from them. can you? well, i think you make a very valid point around the tone of how we talk about this. and i think that we need to, you know, actually i think the way the government's approached, the news of the facts has been very muted, very coming in, not sort of saying, oh, it's all over. it's all going to be fine. i think the good ones have when you've got something, so i'm expecting difficult as in

a virus that people still there fully understand. and yes, i think that earlier on in the pandemic, it was a tendency some i think politicians generally and often have this tendency is to always show the best case scenario when it's tonight into trouble is level with everybody about some of the difficulties. the purpose of the hole isn't it? that's an appalling admission because at a time of an international health crisis, you would think you could get the truth from the government and they've been high, is not what they need homeland over the coals by the statistics watchdog time and time again for putting out shoddy data, haven't they, in june the head of the statistics, author ity, accuse the government of continuing to mislead the public over the number of covert tests carried out. the aim it says seems to be to show the largest possible number of tests, even at the expense of understanding last week. the office for statistics regulation warn that the use of data has not consistently been supported by transparent

information provided in a timely manner. and you're happy about that, are you? well, i think that the difficulty with data is that statisticians will have very long arguments about how best to present something or how rigorously one might argue to present something. since the government's watchdog, this is the government somewhat saying that, well, well it is, it is, it is the government statistical watchdog. however, the way the statistics are put out that was how from the department of health will or number 10 downing street. actually the speed with which we're trying to put out the information from all sometimes means that the state school authorities do not have the time or not given the time to fully put their, their view of how that information could be best presented in just a matter of course, you can have an argument by some parliamentary committees where we spend hours the basic, how the right way is to just lawfully present in different ways. i don't think actual the government has done anything other than trying present as much

information as quickly as possible to the public. the only failing often it hasn't done a good job, has it. if its own watchdog is holding it over the coals, you said in july, the government's efforts to date to tackle covered 900. have been rather impressive . would you like to revise that opinion given some of the things that we've been talking about? well, no, i was talking about the government and the government has done it everything. it could not cause there were mistakes made. i never deny that there were states made in every single could have not admitting them rather than not admitting them. they're still rewriting history. they're still saying that everybody who needed care got it. well, that's manifestly untrue from the frontline doctors for that's not true if you take the issue of testing. for example, i've seen the health section, the house of commons repeatedly say, look, you know, we know we are testing enough people, we're trying to increase the number of tests we're having. for example, i seen the chancellor get up and say look, you know we, we've done this so response to economic challenge. and actually now we're going to

act because i've listened to people, i've heard that we need support other people in get for this. i don't think the government has been sort of lined it as any of the right 1st time. i don't care whether, you know, you've, even if you even had criticism of the, of the data from the former prime minister to resign. may she said last week, for many people, it looks as if the figures are chosen to support the policy rather than the policy being based on the figures that's a crushing indictment for such a senior figure in your party, isn't it? it is a crushing indictment and what she was referring in that was she was inferring to the chief scientific medical officers, their data in relation to the sort of month long lockdown that england is, has now been brought into. and these were the same people, as you quoted earlier, criticising the government, i suppose, what i'm saying this is, there are, this is in a moment of unprecedented stress on the british state, the british health system. and sometimes everybody within that system is sometimes

got things wrong, but i do not believe that is in any way a judgment on the motives, i think on some level, the speed and the strain with which people. but hunter has meant that sometimes the data may not have been corrected a particular point, but nobody, nobody has ever suggested or should ever suggest that somehow the government hasn't tried to the best quality information timely manner. well, you say that, but the fact is, the very vocal and senior members of your party are now fed up with the government and saying it publicly, and they're, they're fed up with a lot that they're fed up with the loss of the boosterism, the gross exaggerations that have no basis in reality and that shoddy data and you fed up with all this as well. but i say what i'm fed up with only 19, the problem is coded 1000 isn't telling us. and i'm fed up with a lot and i want to be able to do everything i want and i'm not fed up with the u. turns the constant u. turns on policy. we had at the end of august charles walker,

vice chair of the $922.00 back bench committee, who said it's becoming increasingly difficult to promote and defend government policy. as so often that policy is changed or abandoned without notice. the climate of uncertainty it creates, he said, is sustainable. this is one of the big beasts of your party. actually coming out now and saying, i'm off of this enough of these u. turns and you aren't really. i thought i thought huge respect charles. but i think that's a bit over the top. i think walks has made us fed up, as i said, is, is, is the lockdown because nobody wanted to, to go back into that. and reluctant, prime minister has they sit in premises, not one state was forced. and the result of him having to take has made a lot of conservative m.p.'s straighted because the conservative party we do not like infringing on anyone's liberty that has made a lot of people frustrated, myself included. yes. a lot of people, a lot of people in the president of the city, a lot of people in the country aren't impressed either calling to you. gov. 69

percent of the country thinks this government has handled the pandemic fairly badly or very badly. only 3 percent. think it's done very well. it's us poll is asked if morris johnson is incompetent or resigning 54 percent said yes. do you share that view? i'm afraid opinion polls will say one thing, one day and something else. the other. i know judgment your party is trying to quote them when they like them, then the judgment on how we have done in managing this virus really will only be able to be made once the whole situation crisis is over. i remember when people in ng i was saying that we don't make mistakes. then through most of the summer people were saying sweden's got everything right now. some people are saying, oh, well sweden's, having a surge, maybe they made some mistakes. the truth is that only at the end of it's, we really be able to judge how each government has managed and it's very, very difficult in, in the moment to do it,

especially so many people have died. so many jobs have been lost so much that i mean, it's very convenient to push the judgment on to some period when perhaps the conservative party is out of government to not deal with things now, but the opportunity to learn lessons is now and we know you mentioned the test and trace system. well that's been a fiasco, hasn't it? after mr. new turns. dido harding who runs it, had to apologize. the prime minister talked about the failures of fact is your party spent gigantic sums around 10000000000 pounds on a system that doesn't work. how do you explain this shattering figure? well, i think that the difficulty with test and trace is as he passed the test, it actually made huge strides. the difficulty was the tracing and the isolating of individual contacts. i happen to think that our trials of mass testing are going well in liverpool than elsewhere. once that is rolled out and it be rolled out

quite soon. i think the backtrace will be a lot easier to do as what i hope will happen. actually now going forward and this isn't minimizing the difficulties with the chief, which you've described. it's just that going forward. now, i hope that actually spits of that test and chases them will be improved. well, look, spending, you know, billions of pounds on something that isn't as effective as you like. is not, is not a good thing to do. of course, we don't want and i look at a country like germany, where people were haven, germany for quality stocks and trace a system. and yet germany went into a national lockdown a couple of weeks ago because they had a surge in cases. i know michelle salami that very important questions about some of the companies brought in to run this test and trade system of the biggest beneficiary was a company called sun service for the ministry of justice. apparently that misconduct included charging for offenders who were dead. nothing out there that this company is rewarded them with a massive contract. now by this government you was me think it's acceptable to

reward a company with contracts like that when it has a record of the kind i've just described. well i, if, when i was on the public accounts committee of public spending watched or here in parliament, i looked at certain events detail. and, you know, have a look at exact how they do things. and of course, sometimes they've made mistakes. you make the point around minister of justice, but of course it is right and completely proper to give a contract, but company who is trying to deliver what it's been asked to do. and nobody is saying the reason why the testing traces them. it's not, it's been cause a circle, it is because of the huge complex you're doing, we're trying, but what this country is trying to do, and indeed what lots of other countries are also struggling with doing it is wrong to suggest that somehow there's something in a judgement about using an offensive, efficient private company to try and help deliver public goods. because if you

don't believe any private company should be involved with any, then you should say, well, why such an interesting is you've set an interesting precedent here. a record of gross misconduct is no bar to getting contracts from this government. and i'm puzzled that you find that acceptable when there are so many countries out there that don't have records of gross misconduct. well, it's not about winning. when you tender for a contract as a government, you could have tender and you will examine that on its merits. or not is that if the decision should, if, if the contract should have gone to another company. by all means, that's an argument that one can have on the basis of the evidence presented as to maybe why another company may have been able to get more effect. but it's room, and that's one thing in the huge number of contracts circa has for the british government over many, many years. the one area where things are going wrong in relation to an unrelated arab initiative fence. or if you have just somehow makes it. so they should never,

ever deliver a project for the british. so wrong thing to do, but to try to work with our private sector partners to get the best outcome too. and you've got, you can't have it. you need to have accountability and usually you have to do it. if that happens, you've got to have accountability and this is something that the government manifestly doesn't like. we saw at the beginning of october health secretary, matt hancock was in the house of commons. maybe you were there too. he was asked by an m.p. about the difficulties of getting tests for his constituents. but instead of overing a full and frank answer, hancock told him, i will not have this divisive language. i just won't have it. he then sat down without addressing the question at all. i'm wondering, do you think that kind of arrogance is acceptable from a minister? who last time i looked was a public servant paid for out of the public purse? do you think that's an acceptable answer? i will not have this divisive language, i just won't have it so perfectly innocent question about testing in this man's constituency. well, i don't recall the exact question that you said to him,

so i can't comment on that. what i can say from what you've told me is the sometimes the house of commons can be a very heated place. and i'm sure, and i always, you know, whenever i'm in the house of commons, i always try to remain as calm as possible. but i'm not under stress the health sector is currently under. and so i think bearing in mind how much time is spent on his many questions, exams that if he has,, if he's been sort of inadvertently stressed when he's answered a particular m.p., i don't think that should be hanging offense. i think, you know, he's under stress like, but many people at the top of government and i'm sure i know the health actually think absolutely everything, everything he can to improve the situation. we are, we understand stress. but we also understand that if you are stressed and you say things like that, you can apologize later as far as we know, there was no apology to the gentleman concerned. what are the house and the house

actually can speak for itself? what i will just say to stress again, is, is the house of commons can be a pretty aggressive place as it should be because it's, it's a vibrant democracy. and sometimes sometimes things come out not quite in the way you otherwise would have liked. so i don't think that we should, we should condemn either the person asking the question of the health of intemperate language. let's talk if we may about it briefly. this came to a head in september with the government's declared intention to reach international law and renege on parts of the bracks it withdrawal agreement relating to northern ireland. spectacular act of bad faith wasn't this point in the negotiations? no, i don't think it was an act about actually what's, what this war were were 3 particular instances of making sure that in the event where there was no drugs. and in the event that the dispute resolution mechanism to

have under the withdrawal agreement do not reach out. we had to make sure the main unity and the coherence of our own united kingdom was intact. and that is my sure, and i mean for signing the agreement last year, you signed it in good faith and you intend to break it in bad faith. there are out there are ways of changing the text of this if you wanted to buy dispute resolution, but you chose to do it unilaterally when it was too much for the government's top legal official such an oven jones, who resigned in protest when the level of service it is says i'm from tories about this. well, what actually is the case is this would only come into effect if there is no agreement trade deal. if the dispute resolution mechanisms are completely exhausted, so this, this would only occur this causes would only come into force in the unlikely,

unlikely situation that those 2 things were the case. well, you've got the obstacle with the new biden and ministration, the us, which takes a similar view as the e.u. . they've already slammed this decision to remain on the withdraw treaty is passed . johnson going to have to go cap in hand to the us and offer one more u. turn another day, another policy reversal. pretty humiliating, isn't it? well, i'm pretty sure the prime minister will get on well with the new president. and i'm also sure that regardless of so relationship, institutional reasons why prime minister united in the present united states become and work closely together is because of the relationship between between our 2 countries. so i don't believe what the, my understanding of what the biden team was worried about was the idea that somehow we would compromise the good friday agreement in overnight. and we've been absolutely resolute about the measures. in fact, find i 91 them closer together. and we absolutely will not compromise on the friday

. well, nobody believes that because you, renee, do you are intending to relay go international agreement? only row countries do that, don't they? it's hardly something that the british government wants to be known for around the world, but it is now its word doesn't count for anything signs an agreement. and then a few months later says, i'm not going to abide by that. what trust do you think can be ever invested in the british government again, while it's looking for trade deals around the world? well, we've recently signed a trade deal with japan. that was a very comprehensive and free trade deal, frankly went further than most people, myself included, it takes effort in areas lanie. you got out of it. the very deal. it wasn't as good as the one that the has with japan and i, i reject that. actually, if i look at traditions in particular around financial services, they are much further than what the e.u. has, which a plan. and if you will, if you brought a point around, trust is an important one. and i will repeat, you know,

that the very remote scenarios in which these particular clauses may come into effect. but a lot of the problem was actually, oh, and i think governments and in certain parts does mean what is around how we communicate, what we're trying to make sure that people do not think that somehow it's our intention to break all these international agreements. now, i'm not blaming the media, it's awful. we need to communicate much more carefully, much more. that's why we're taking so, and he do that continuing, continuing, going forward. and i'm hopeful that there will be no breakdown in trust with this country. as i say, the japanese government doesn't seem to think that there's a breakdown in trust with britain or i've been my for nami, been good to have your own comfort zone. thank you very much.

thanks to the time to cut cut, cut, cut, cut,

cut, cut, cut. to a 5 years after the attack on about a client in paris. his son was an assassin. his daughter was a thick dung. both of their fathers wrote a book together, a lesson in dialogue intolerant. at a time when as long as terrorists are killing again, focus on your a 30 minute song, d, w. it was the 1st international tribunal in history. the number of trials 75 years ago,

a high ranking officers of the nazi regime were indicted by the allied forces. they were the 1st war criminals to be held accountable for their crimes. our 2 part series, the 3rd reich in the dark. in 75 minutes on t.v. w d t, you know that 77 percent a biopic are younger than 6 of fox. that's me. and me and you and you know what? it's time all voices, but part of the 77 percent to talk about the issues that popped up. this is where, you know, 77 percent this weekend on d. w

give us your country. people will make you rich people, oil. viju withdrawal will, will take good care of refugees to a big one. fever took hold on the west coast of qana in 2007. investors made promises, but years later, reality looks very different. litter beaches. good drinking water shortage. unemployment is a good. yeah. i mean this if not a trace of oil money, but the mystery of black gold oil, thomas,

it's starts december 4th. this is news and these are our top stories. the european commission has signed a deal to secure up to 300000000 doses of a coded 19 vaccine developed by germany's beyond take. and us pharmaceutical giant pfizer vaccines microsite. it has shown itself to be more the 90 percent effective . i expect to begin shipping it to e.u. states by the end of the polish nationalist and right wing extremists have clashed with police training.