is a reminder of the top story we're following for you. the sales people around the world have begun ringing in the new year on kong, put on a fi, which despite at victoria hub, accompanied by music from the cities philharmonic orchestra, but festivities in many places, a bank scowl back this year. mid i shop rising, coven 19 cases. and that is all for now. the cupboard special program is up after a short break on the channel for the latest headlines. don't forget, there's always a website to be found at d, w dot com on social media. the handle you need is at d. w. news. i'll be back with another bulletin in 45 minutes to stay with the site against the corolla virus pandemic. how has the rate of infection been developing? what does the latest research say? information and context?

the corona virus update because 19 special next on d w to be your own health advocate. by turning into your own expert. we are your coach without any fiction and lots of facts. be active in a clever way with on dw, ah, ah, ah, but carbon dioxide emissions are expected to return to pre pandemic ice this year. last year they fell significantly

during the great lock down in china. they bounced back and grew overall due to cold. the crisis has only given climate change, respite and unprecedented consumption. boom is fueling the global economy and people are driving more to avoid getting infected on public transport. then there's the pandemic most visible legacy plastic waist high. i'm been for solon, millions of people around the world have taken to wearing masks to protect themselves, but they're hurting the environment. we'll talk about that and the pandemic carbon footprint in a moment with sir dieter helm. first is report the silken islands

. it's a far south west of the territory comprising hong kong to waters. here have long been polluted. but with a pandemic, a new form of waste is turned up masks. and now we have this to contend with. we have the corona virus and all these last so now we're helping these images make me start to wonder how much of a hazard are these masks for our planet. it's an item that many of us now where every day and why do so many of them end up in the ocean instead of being disposed of through the normal channels. and what's the right way to dispose of a mask anyway? it masking, if it pitts why, whether it's the higher grade respirator masks or the more basic surgical ones or rubber gloves that people are also using. now they all belong in the trash and

aren't suitable for recycling because their medical waste they've been used. so they need to be incinerated, isn't, is unlikely island in us move on, but for going to happen. at some stage, you end up with micro plastic. that's what makes the mass span for the environment along the coast of hong kong. scientists are finding a growing number of them. they estimate that around 1500000000 masks entered the see last year. and we need to have juice, single. yes, number one. but then also come sanchez, government and yeah, how they handle their waste management facilities because right here, the garbage bins, the rubbish pins in the street and they have very wide openings all up and people just put them austin thinking that during the right thing. and they get blown out very easily, and as soon as they're out there on the street, they go down the drain, they go down the drain slowly, drains lead to the ocean. it looks like masks won't be disappearing or line anytime

soon. they're already far too many of the seen from all. let's ask if you could help my professor of economic policy at oxford university in the u . k. he's the author of numerous books. sam was recently ignited for his services to the environment and energy policy. so the to, we've seen all those used masks and test kits lying around. plastic waste is one obvious environmental impact of this pandemic. what are others? well, you actually right, that plastic waste is, is go up quite considerably. and we have to recall that one of the great drivers of each oil demand is plastics. and it just shows how hard it is, tackle that. but lots of other impacts. i suspect the one that's going to be the biggest is the impact of all the fiscal and monetary stimulus is and the extra demand,

the back right around the world. and that i think will be the lasting legacy of economic shock of current, of ours and the environment will be having impacts as a consequence of economic shop. is there any way around that? i mean, economists are always telling us to buy more to keep our economy is going to create jobs. do we, or should we hold off? well, you know, some consumption is perfectly consistent with the sustainable economy. and some isn't. and the idea that the objective should be just a boost g d p, which is a very true measure of well being ah, is one that charles very badly with some of that unsustainable consumption, which we should be focused on, not just in the carbon context, but also, of course in the by diversity you wrote in may 2020 the most important lesson from

the virus so far is that pollution and g d p are still correlated, not decoupled. do you see changes here? well actually um in a way i was too optimistic with that statement. it turns out that higher g d p and higher environmental impacts. i've been going together and particularly a competent. but what we witness during the crone of ours was a shock contraction. the g d p, but without an environmental buns. so although it's true, for example, that carbon emissions went down quite a lot during the lot downs. we still added 2 parts per 1000000 to the concentration of carbon in the atmosphere as we had done for the previous 30 years. and so what we've learned, i think, is that even if you contract ah demanded the short term g, d p in the short. so that isn't enough to hold these fundamental at 1st trends

in the way in which our natural environment and our climate are going talking about the climate and our natural environment. this climate crisis is intertwined with biodiversity loss in the spread of zonati. diseases are also intertwined. do you think people really understand that link? i doubt very much whether all the focus on getting carbon emissions down as fully understood the carbon emissions are only half the climate change problem and have to be set in a wider environmental context in the natural environment. soaks, not carbon. and we and the natural environment, emit kaufman sequestration is 50 percent or more of the climate change problem. and you just have to look at what's going on agriculture and the soils and so on to see that. and it turns out that secret situation is where the interaction comes

with biodiversity and by diversity loss, take the startling fact that the amazon is now a net emitter of carbon. that huge biodiversity bank, ah, hot spot in our world, is not only now shedding. it's by diversity as it are burned, but also at now contributing to climate change. that should be a major wake up call. and it's the sort of thing which requires at least as much focus as the obvious things like, for example, getting out of coal. so what do you think will change people's mind or change behaviors? because you say the amazon should be a wake up call. you think covered 19 would also be a wake up call, but we see it cop $26.00. the same old problems. yes, i think up 26 like the previous 25 that made no significant difference adding 2000000

per annum as we have done for the last 30 years, the atmosphere and but i think when people talk about behavioral change, they have to get in mind 2 distinct things that some people think that we can change human nature the way we are. and my take is that evolution has brought us to where we are. and human nature is roughly the same. ah, tomorrow's it was yesterday and he most places it remains pretty constant. what we can change is the incentives on us and those incentives so that we make different choices. given our human nature, that's about carbon taxes, carbon pricing, making polluters, pay, integrating the environment into the economy. and at sad to say that the cop $26.00, that was butcher no discussion about serious carbon pricing about carbon board pricing, about carbon consumption pricing. these are things confronting you,

and me as the ultimate polluters with the costs and consequence of our actions. that's what changes behavior, not some appeal to, you know, people have changed their nature going forward because of the experience. the corona verse. sadly, not. there's no evidence whatsoever of that. so the to help from oxford university in the u. k. thank you very much for being on the show today. thank you. and of your question now for our science, corresponded derek williams on the recycling of masks. oh, and boiling use masks and water, clean them of pathogens. oh, like other kinds of personal protective equipment masks, work in really short supply. pretty much everywhere. for months after the pandemic 1st head, lots of people just made their own and the right ways to keep

a multi use masked clean. we're a big issue. a manufacturers have now ramped up production of disposable masks to the point where, at least by german standards, they're plentiful and cheap, but i'm sure there neither and many other places. so here's what the world health organization has to say on cleaning used masks. multi use fabric masks should be washed at least once a day in soap or detergent and water that's heated to at least 60 degrees celsius. if that isn't possible, then you can also wash the masks and room temperature water 1st, then placed them in boiling water from one minute to get rid of potential pathogens . but what about washing or boiling single use masks? well, i found a few studies looking at whether they can also be decontaminated for further use. and the researchers came to the conclusion that when certain cleaning procedures

were followed correctly, high quality commercial masks remained an effective barrier even after washing. however, both the c d c and the w h o continue to warn that disposable masks should not be washed or reused, but instead thrown away after one use. so the experts there clearly are not yet convinced that it's a good idea. hm. you heard it from derek. nice to have you long. stay safe and see you again. say, ah, nico africa, house is built out of a great idea. can they an entrepreneur nelson bow a tang?

he makes sustainable, like hus breaks from plastic waste collected from the street from acura. so i'm so excited that i got used one probably about the plastic waste problem, and then you've got sample them to solve a problem and gonna go africa next on d, w eco, in a while going from is becoming a super plans hello to pay a startup company produce hotels, bread from a flower fibers. and the left overweight is reuse is the collapse of plants offering the indian textile industry at 1060 minutes on d w with

we're all the good to go beyond the obvious as we take on the world. 8 hours, i do all the fans, we're all about the stories that matter to you whatever it takes by policemen a where we are here is actually on fire made for my own ah, a.