to the last 56 years, but also how much of it has been directed against the globalization, the from rising populism to a global pandemic. and war in europe. the consequences are ready by saying stagflation trade all talk, the trade was, worry you cry? no, it's a, it's a difficult, locally bar for every action never before has the post war economic order been on such chafie grands rooted is a, you know, he wants to get rid of the states in this video will unravel some of the threads of what is done increasingly tangled story will look at the complicated relationship between the united states and china. when turner sits, when, when it often means china wants to ring twice. geopolitical conflicts and crises are re forging alliances. beijing had under she didn't pick,

had seen cotton as allied in the common presentment of the united states and has some countries are finding themselves in a tricky balancing act between friends and foes. this is a big, big issue. what india, it's a, it's a sort of, i will issue that though, coming up on business beyond for the best part of a century, the united states have been the world's undisputed economic superpower. after world war 2, inexperienced, enormous growth driven by ramp and consumerism and a growing faith in free enterprise. the fall of communism in 1989 further solidified faith in western that system. economic barriers fell as countries rushed to fill demand in an ever more connected global marketplace. the effect on world trade was dramatic. in 1950,

63000000000 dollars. within 10 years that figure had more than doubled and by 1998 multiplied $34.00 to $3.00 trillion dollars. in 2020, it's more than 17 trillion. ah. but in recent years we've seen a backlash against globalization. and many economists think it was the global financial crisis that set the stage for the shift we're seeing today. the whole model, our capital, is more maybe with more social characteristics in europe. but still, i was put was tested on the reading of our circuit, china. but even russia was that our model was very fragile. the financial crisis was followed a few years later by a rise in both populism authoritarianism around the world.

when you look at trends, especially not only the rise of china, china under, she'd be more aggressive, fraud and aggressive terms. you've got a very different context now. when it comes to shifting power dynamics on the global economic stage, no story can rival that of the united states and china ah 19 ac, china's g d p accounted for less than 3 percent of total global i put with us accounting for more than a 3rd since then it's played an extraordinary game of catch up. the us share of global g d p have fall into less than 25 percent with china. and i would think for over 18 percent trying to would like to be in the position that it has been historically way back in the where it was center and

others interacted with china in a way that gave china desk in china could keep everything under control and have it go their way. claire read negotiated for the us on trade with china, from 2006 to 2014. she says china, long term goal is to dominate future proof industries like artificial intelligence, semi conductor chip, and pharmaceutical. for china to acquire the kind of international influence, the u. s. has had for decades, it will need to deepen its relationships, although not a formula lines the bricks that brazil russia, india, china, and africa has attracted some attention in china. the think from media has praised the bricks alliance for boosting, what it called non western styles of multilateralism. but alliances don't guarantee harmony. the relationship between china and india, both members, it's

a good case in point home to 1400000000 people. india is the worlds fastest growing big economy, but it's relationship with china is currently overshadowed by a fraction border dispute. tens of thousands of soldiers from both sides are stationed on the more than 3000 kilometer long border. hardly a solid foundation for an ever deepening can on the union in short say that this is actually an katie made at the moment and this is also spilling on in political, economic, strategic issues as well. no surprise. and that india has been courses by the us as part of its own trade standoff with china. it's part of the new us lead indo pacific economic frameworks, a free trade pact of 14 mostly asian nations,

which excludes china the indian chinese relationship isn't the only complicated one within bricks. india is also facing a tricky balancing act in its relations with russia. it's failure to take a clear stance on the war and ukraine on its decision to buy more russian energy have rates rise. but commentators point out that historically sales of russian goth to europe have been far more significant. and that criticism of india's purchase as this here are being taken out of context. this year is an exception mark, if you look at the last 70 years, the total impulse is no more than at the most. while in for something like a $100000000000.00 from the middle east. so nowhere in proportion as when we say the russian energy complement in the energy basket.

so i think it is an exaggeration, probably lack of information. questions of energy dependence have come to the 4th and rushes invasion of ukraine. the p and countries rushed to lessen their dependence on russian. gov and western sanctions aim to cut moscow eyes of the financial system. it's no wonder at the flood of mere poodle is among those pushing hard for an alternate order. listening to mature over the past decades, new powerful centers have been formed on the planet. clearing themselves louder and louder. each of them develops its own political systems and public institutions, implement its own models of economic growth in the amount of course of the right to protect them. can you to ensure national sovereignty shoot united states? you know, some really neat yet. but the war in ukraine has put pressure on countries that may have been ready to align themselves with russia. shortly before the war,

china and russia declared that there were no limits to their strategic partnership . but so far, there is little evidence that china is willing to break western sanctions on russia . but russia and china is growing bonds under the leadership of food. and then she does appear to have one water tice element from joint opposition to a us lead global order. beijing, under she jan, paying has seen her as allied in their common resentment of the united states and the u. s. at global leadership, as, as a superpower, and what they see as interference in their domestic, internal affairs, criticism of their political systems, pressure to change their economies address, human rights, et cetera. and so that alignment is probably gone further than most expected. china

may want the united states to stay out of business, but the reality is the 2 countries economies are deeply entangled. despite detentions of recent years, which saw the country slap tariffs on each other goods from china and the us remain each other. the biggest individual trading partners, us trade with china, has grown to magically in recent decades. but as you can see here, it's an on even relationship with the united states importing far more from china than it exports. that has led to colds for the united states to decouple. in other words, disentangle itself from china, but it's not realistic. if the united states tried to de couple entirely from china, it would be very harmful to our economy. it would probably be harmful to our innovation. it would just have other economies

industries step in where the united states stepped out. so it wouldn't work. decoupling probably wouldn't be a very good idea for china either. china also knows that its larger economic faith lives with the rest of the world. and even though it has this tense relationship with united states and others, it is you know, most of its economic growth. it's been dependent on globalization with the rest of the world. it needs to find a way to balance those things. at the beginning of this video, we asked whether we're at the dawn of a new global economic age. is the case of a us versus a chinese lead system. the differences are major. the market lead system of the u. s. favors the lack of government intervention that chinese system favors had the

state involvement. ah, they have reinvigorated support for state enterprises really focused on indigenous using technology, achieving, trying to achieve self reliance, not done what previous leaders have done and trying to manage and maintain a healthier constructive relationship with the united states and the west. and so what i'm talking about, what kind of order china would like, it's really what kind of order a sheet and thing lead china would life, which is a world safe for state capitalist authoritarian systems. so could opposition to a chinese inspire to protection of order be strong enough to push back the tides. think it's a realistic hope that there could be a backlash, backlash, that large numbers of people. maybe even the clear majority in many will realize that nationalism, that protectionism and rivalry,

close it miss all worse for them than being more open are engaged. and having political bullies is worse than signing up the turmoil, on least by the global financial crisis of 2008 and 9. and more recently, the pandemic and war in ukraine has laid fair and new truth blind faith. and globalization has come to an end with

ah, and i rode vehicles. we check out the 5th generation financial arrange ah supreme luxury. but is this really wild driving red? 30 minutes on d. w. take us special safari through spectacular landscapes, populated by fascinating living, things travels through worlds that she's never seen quite like

the world of our body. let the adventure begin. life on us. in 75 minutes on d w. ah. what people have to say matters to us or me. that's why we listened to their stories. reporter every weekend on d w. how did she become adults hitler's favorite director. and how did he become a forgotten filled pioneer? lady he finished and arnold fun between hitler and hollywood in 1932, they set out into the icy wilderness of greenland to create

a life threatening a film project that became a major milestone in their lives. love seduction and power ice cold passion starts october 8th on d, w ah, ah ah, this is dw news live from berlin. the ukraine continues to regain territory and areas claimed by russia. president zalinski says troops have liberated more towns and several regions, ukrainian forces. and now pressing their counter offensive in the southern region on.