ah ah ah ah, this is the w news live from bullet the u agrees. fresh sanctions against russia after its illegal annexations in you cried. brussels promises a tough response with plan penalties for moscow to include a price cap on russian or also coming up. how real is russia?

nuclear threats president putin has warned the west. any attack on russia including illegally annex parts of you pray, could provoke and nuclear response. so what weapons could he use and how likely is it to use at the nobel prize for 3 pioneers of click chemistry, royal swedish academy of sciences, almost the trio for discovering a way to snap molecules together. technology that could help make counter drugs more effective to plus a 60 years today since the premier of the 1st james bond film fans already wondering who could be the next in line to play age and double. 07. ah,

ah, i'm go ahead, else has welcome to the program. your opinion has agreed to impose new sanctions on russia in response to the war in ukraine. they will include a cap on the price of russian oil exports. the security threat from russia is also on the table as members of the european parliament meet in strasburg. the you commission president has told me piece that member states need to step up their security of their in energy infrastructure also on the line also said the you is not ready to discuss a price cap on gas emit soaring prices to city mac. i'm joined by are you correspondence jack? paris in brussels and max sunder in stroudsburg. jack, let's start with you. what more do we know about the plan sanctions? well, we don't have the full details yet. gerhardt, the sanctions will be published in the journal of the european union on thursday when we will have exactly the details of what this price cut means at the moment.

we don't know how much it cost, how long it will last. this was a deal to get the legal basis for this oil cap. what we do know though, is that the hungarians, who were extremely opposed and have been extremely opposed to all fossil fuel sanctions, that they say they've got an exemption. the spokes person of the, the foreign ministry tweet, ministry treated to say that they don't the sanctions don't harm andries interests in granted exemptions from the sanctions that would have violated hungry interests and endangered the security of their energy supply. so we know that that is a big difference in how these sanctions are going to be imposed because until now they've required unanimity all 27, e u countries. it wasn't only the hungarians that had a problem with these sanctions though. countries like motor cypress greece, with big shipping fleets that have been shipping russian oil. they've had their concerns, as well as i say, we don't know the details at the moment, and we'll find out exactly how they've managed to proclaim black 8. all of these

countries to get this deal over the line, but the ambassadors did manage to sign off on them this morning. max or the european parliament in strasburg, where, where you are also debated the illegal annexation of ukrainian land by russia today . what's their position spread, garrett. so it probably does not come as a surprise if i tell you that across party lines across political groups you in the european parliament. the sentiment was that the annexation of ukrainian land by russia is illegal. it's null and void and meaningless. it does not change facts on the ground. this is something that all parties are pretty much agree to the have been calls for further sanctions. some of these things that jack just pointed out, and also some are some members, some groups in particular, the conservative block has called for further weapons deliveries to ukraine, especially tanks and heavy artillery by country such as germany in france,

urban calls for them to take the lead, but bottom line here today at the european parliament, the messages that russia cannot and unilaterally moved borders. this will not be accepted by the european union. thank you. matt said that been several nuclear threats by russia as lead of lot of me put in bolts. the position of the european parliament then right, so the use top diplomat, joseph burrell, the high representative, spoke at the beginning of the session this morning, parliament i sing calling it a source of concern that a nuclear power was retreating on the battlefield. apart from that, we did not hear much about the this nuclear threat does not seem to be the top her already among a m e p. c, or a spoke to one of the conservative any piece on the side on the debate. he told me this, he believes that this is more of a, a scare tactic that russia will not. he was nuclear weapons also because they would been admits that, that they would be defeated and conventional warfare. furthermore, he told me that he believes the u. s. sent a very clear message to rush already that if they used nuclear weapons in ukraine

or elsewhere, this would have a very strong conventional response. so it seems that m p 's here are really focusing on what russia is doing. so has been doing so far and not so much on the future prospects of a nuclear escalation. now, jack, back to you in brussels there. this is the 8th a package of sanctions since february, affective have the previo previous ones been yeah, that's the question, isn't it? god, exactly that. i think from an e u perspective, they think that they have managed to be quite cutting on the russian economy. the european commission president as of on the line said that they have been quick and decisive in getting this sanctions package over the line as a bit of context. i think that there will be very, very pleased that they managed to do it within the ambassadorial meeting here in brussels this morning. we have a big summit coming up at the end of this week in prague. all of the use lead is going to be there plus leaders from this new european political community idea,

including the u. k. countries like turkey as well. and they really didn't want it to run over. to go over into that summit where you'd see leaders arguing over this, the sanctions are in response to the referendums that were considered a sham and to be illegal. but this is the big question. similar to what mike was talking about, the threat of nuclear war, there are so many complex, complicated issues around energy, around the type of warfare around supplies that are really concerning to the european union at the moment. all the only tool they really have guard at the moment is sanctions. and they've got this. i ran a friend of the line jack barack in brussels and mike summer in strasburg. thank you both as ukrainian forces make advances in the south and east of the country. there's concern that russia may consider using it's tactical nuclear weapons to hold illegally annex territory. the w reporter joel dull roy has more well, just days ago,

russia declared ownership of several ukrainian regions. but each day since ukraine has undermined those declarations from moscow with its victories on the ground. and we can take a look at some of those now. in the eastern region of dawn, yet they reclaimed the city of lyman and nearby towns. now leman is considered a strategic city due to its many railway connections, but it's in the south that they have really made some of the most impressive recent gains just yesterday in the regional hassan ukrainian forces claim to have pushed the front line back by around 30 kilometers, re taking the town of do chaney and regional official say that ukrainian troops are moving along the denise river, recapturing villages as they go well, rushes recent losses a prompting domestic criticism of the army strategy, one of potent allies that russia should now consider using low yield nuclear weapons. so with the threat of nuclear war on the table, what buttons could russia reach for?

well, both the u. s. and russia have nuclear thought pause of between 5 and 6000 warheads and all of these, the u. s. mostly has large, long range weapons, but one 3rd of russia stockpile is assumed to be so called tactical warheads, which are smaller bombs for use on the battle fields. now, tactical warheads have lower payloads and shorter delivery systems, although they won't result in a global nuclear winter, they would still be devastating across a large area. so how real is russia's nuclear threat? while the director of the c, i recently said that there is no practical evidence of russia being close to using nuclear weapons. and other western monitors have also said that there's no sign of russia moving their warheads out of their bunkers. but now every russian maneuver is being closely watched for any sign of where the putting is rhetoric will move into reality. my colleagues, joel dahl roy reporting them. and earlier i spoke to eleanor soccer. she's the

executive director, director of the vienna center for disarmament and non proliferation. i asked if she thought putin is likely to use a nuclear weapon at this point in the war. i don't think we are at the point where the use of nuclear weapons likely and i would agree with the assessment coming from the director of the ca, that we don't have the science yet. that there is that when we move to deploy or, and make preparations. moreover, i think that a use of a tactical nuclear weapon, or any you can at this point, would actually make things much worse for russia. and there are many reasons for that. they would certainly break the to they certainly rate there. oh, no. commitments announcements and the doctor. and it also was

pushed away those who have not been joining nato and last in sanctions, or staying on the sidelines, including key parts of india and pakistan. now how easy do you think would it be? and that's the question that's been on my mind for a long time. how easy would it be for putting to carry out a nuclear strike, taking the chain of command into consideration? what is, what is in place that what safeguards are in place? you know there are safeguards in place, particularly when it comes to launching strategic plan. because as far as found that there is a, please, the individuals who need to agree on their lunch post about there is a little bit of a different situation with wanting

a fee. but still in order to can me come on to the troops on the battlefield. and use them as well as you to do. so there needs to be a decision that does not only in all food, but it's also the chief of staff and the minister of question. so this is at least what we know again, where i want to make sure that the viewers leave the cargo van to spend that we're not there yet. and also we do need to monitor and we need to take it seriously. but there are no science that this is something that is being considered or in any media move on to it. and then that's look over the executive director of the vienna center for disarmament and non proliferation. thank you very much for joining us. you and it'll be a news. thank you. my pleasure. this is nobel prize for chemistry will be

shared by 3 scientists. molten metal from denmark and carolyn, but talk to barry shop. liz from the u. s. they've been recognized for the development of bio orthogonal chemistry and click chemistry, which involves attaching molecules together to create it. makes very sharp is only the 5th person ever to receive a 2nd. nobel, this is what the chair of the nobel committee for chemistry. you will have all quist to say, kick chemistry, is almo, almost like it sounds, it's all about snapping molecules together. imagine that you could attach small chemical buckles to different types of building blocks. daniel could link these buckles together and produce molecules of greater complexity. i'm john,

i'm in the studio. i was from our science department to explain to us what this is all about. first of all, you click chemistry. sounds like a lego to me. what is it all about? it is it like lego? it is a bit like a game, and that was also the aim of this whole research. it was the aim was to make chemistry more functional and more easy because you know, everything is made of molecules so, so we see we look at molecules like the building blocks off of everything of this table of you and me. and that's very complex. nature makes very complex molecular structures, but the difficulty is to make that whole thing or these, this complexity in the lab. and there was not easy until now and there was no gap or until until clay chemistry was developed. and now kick click chemistry looks at how we can stick molecules together and make bigger structures out of them and released make them stick together to, to only the target molecule and not to anything else that's floating around there.

and so it made molecular construction work kind of more easy and more targeted. now it tells me more about the 3 lawyers and their research and how that uses sort of fits together. yeah. so barry tablets are he will, he has won a nobel prize and chemistry in 2001. so this is now his 2nd number provide him industry. it is definitely and he was the 1st to develop the concept of collect chemistry. so he had the idea that you could easily collect molecules together, maybe, and he put that idea out there and it was a hit in the chemistry world. so it was all over the place, let's say. and, and different teams started to work with his concept. and so was martin melville, and he found the 1st reaction where we could actually make click chemistry set into practice. and, and we heard that they used buckles like the blue that could be kind of stick these molecules together and more to melt. i'll use copper for that and copper atom. now

copper is the metal and our body and different living cells. they don't really like a lot of metal, sol. the next question was, how can we put collect chemistry into living cells and use it for, for that purpose as well. and that's where carolyn bertolsi came in. and she found that we can also use sugar complexes to stick molecules to our, for example, living cells in our body lives. very interesting how the work of the 3 scientists clicked together in a way, very briefly, how does this affect our laws? it has huge effect on the scientific world, 1st of all. and we can also see very, very practical applications. for example, the good thing is that you can stick also shiny molecules to other parts. so you can track what these molecules through in our bodies, for example, you can track how drugs are delivered to different parts of our organism and where

they go wrong, where they may be goal of, right. and this has been used for to target pharmaceuticals in cancer treatment, for example, there are no and clinical trials. and also material times it's in use to make materials better fit for their purpose. so yeah, it has a broad use application around 30 pacific world, but it's also a lot to come because the field are still quite new larva from our sales department . thank you very much, much for explaining. click chemistry to thanks for having me. protesters have briefly disrupted a speech by british prime minister list trust. as we address conservative party delegates at the pas annual conference in birmingham. 2 environmental activists held up a sign and shouted slogans before being removed. the speeches being seen as make or break for trust, even though she only took over the job from boris johnson less than a month ago. first major policy move an attempt to cut 45000000000 pounds of taxes

and high government borrowing sent markets into a tailspin and has left her party facing potential electoral collapse. that when i asked the w's bigot massa, london corresponded what trust hoped to accomplish with her address. well, it was very much her attempt to unite the party behind her. her main, basically selling point is, have growth agenda. she, her assessment is that the country isn't in the quarterly crisis, which is of course true. it's high inflation, low productivity and less trust wants to persuade the party base that she's the one to come up with a plan. and her plan is mainly cutting texas. so she doubled down on this plan trying really to, to hammer at home data. she's only one. he is basically daring to cut texas quite aggressively, and that this will lift the country out of the crisis. now she hasn't explained if

that comes at some cost, for example, what does it mean for public services all say are what could it mean for the environment? for example, she is talking about opening up new gas fields. and this is also why environmental protests, as have said they have targeted, has speech bought to the conference. our delegates, i think mostly positive. it was a fairly would and delivery thoughts. i think people really want to tell it to succeeds. i don't want her tea to go down just as yet. well, she's a very, very new prime minister. yeah, she's only got, she only got got the job 4 weeks ago. and this was her 1st speech or to conference . some people in suggesting a could be her last, how much trouble as a government in when you look at the polls, the galvan and also the stress personally isn't a lot of trouble. since she took friends, i talk to people and delegates, really not in a great mood as i talking about how the mess on that though and piece are causing

how that for them is causing huge problems at the doorstep. say that there was a lot of sort of unhappiness at, at the party conference. and we've also seen cabinet ministers open the disagreeing with a prime minister. so all to her, all in all, i don't think this was a very happy place for less trust. ah, have 1st party conference as prime minister, or you can go on a big mass in london there. thank you. big it. and from the british prime minister to another servant of the crown, the spy with a license to kill fighting bad guys. always with a different beautiful woman by his side. now one of the most successful franchises in history is celebrating a big anniversary. 60 years since james bond 1st packed cinema seats. the 1st double. 07 movie doctor. no. premier in london on october. the 5th. 1962 bond has

been in the headlines ever since. and now once again as fan speculate. who will play double? 07, next bunker. ah james. ah suave, quick witted james bond never shies away from danger. women or a vodka martini medium guy martini lemon field. say come knox premiering in 1900. 62. the james bond film franchise had a humble beginning, doctor know, was a low budget flick stowing. and then unknown actor sean connery who's camera presidents would make james bond and international sex symbol. unlike the upper crust bond in author, ian fleming's novels, connery came from the working class, a former milkman, and coffin polisher. he brought a new edge to double. 07. alongside swiss actress ursula undress as honey rider. the very 1st bond girl looking for sharon?

no, i'm just looking, but reviews were mixed time magazine called connery's performance on a slightly silly fail. the vatican had stronger words declaring it a dangerous mixture of violence, vulgarity, sadism, and sex. the kremlin called bonds, the embodiment of capitalist evil was your disregard for human life. he was to working full east, east west, just points of the compass. now, 60 years later, the cold war hero is still making headlines. this aston martin bond mobile from the film. no time to digest, sold at christie's for 3000000 pounds. and with the current bond, daniel craigs retirement from the roll. speculations abound. who will play double? 07 next. bonds producing brother, sister do. oh michael wilson and barbara broccoli are on the lookout. he's been so able to, to move with the times with the various actors who betrayed them. so who will it be?

there was speculation. the next bond could be a woman, but the producer say it will definitely be a man eaters. elbow long considered a hot contender says he's out of the running. there have also been rumors around superman star, henry cavil bridget, and act a rakish on page and pop star harry styles. or maybe it'll be another unknown, like sean connery, 60 years ago. let's take a closer look at that french, as david levis from w cuts, david, it seems more relevant than ever made the quintessential cold war story, if you will russia against the west and on what we're looking for. well, i think, you know, when the next barn movie comes out, they're going to start filming, they say interiors are that might very well be a big topic. so yeah, i will, looking back 60 years ago, this seems more relevant than ever you right back 60 years ago. i mean,

let's talk about the films. it is good to have a known how big this franchise was going to become. i think it's pretty clear that they didn't know because they had such a low budget if they had known that this franchise was going to become so huge. actually do you know how much they've, they've it's worth $7000000000.00. that's how many ticket sales they've had, and that's not even counting an inflation over the last to years. if they had known that there's no way they would have even cast sean connery this unknown guy. so i think it's pretty, pretty clear that they didn't know we were still going to be talking about the 60 years from now. that 60 years later, the people were still good. i had no catch phrases like shaken, not stirred lights and kill. they had no idea. now 6, e is lots of money as we've just learned, but not everyone is celebrated. well, right, and one person in particular who's not celebrating this and anniversary is the very 1st bond girl. and this she said in a scene in the bikini, yeah, she's 86 years old now, she just that in an interview that came out today that she's very unhappy,

she's actually furious at the film franchise. and the reason why is that she was only paid coming back to budget $10000.00 back then for a franchise that became worth $7000000000.00. so she thinks that she has been undervalued, under appreciated, and she wants to see the cash. so she's not the only person who's against james bond. there are plenty of reasons not to like james bond or, you know, looking back using the words we used today. you could talk about toxic masculinity . the way the james bond, especially back then treated women as disposable objects to be used and forgotten. i even grab some of them. i'm looking back and of course they were all powerless to resist his sexual charm. you could not make a movie like that now with women like that or with men like that. there's also plenty of casual racism going back 60 years ago. if you look at doctor know black people in the film are portrayed as subservient. this was filmed in jamaica just before jamaica. got it's independence from the british empire. and the doctor know

himself is a villain, is played by white actor who's a painted to look more asians, and plenty of know goes and yet we're still talking about it. we're start talking about sean connery, who is still the most popular bond ever. not that brief. if you can double. 07. has a changed a lot. this elation about who will play next? there. there absolutely is. the producers are keeping quite tight lips. they say they're not going to start filming for 2 years. what we do now is not going to be a woman, very likely to be an actor of color for the 1st time, and very likely to be someone in his thirty's, because they want someone who can play the role for at least 10 years. and they've said that someone in his twenties would be too young. so get hot. sorry, i don't think you're going to make me a call if i may be an extra. ok. thank you very much. david c w culture. and we are

continuing a ways news, asia, i'm golfers, and berlin, thanks for watching. ah ah, with

who i what is a home or go civilization? a reflection of our society, a spiritual awakening with an entire universe of culture. a new episode each week. august 21 on d w. a. we're interested in the global

economy. our portfolio d w business. beyond. here, the closer look at the project. our mission. to analyze the fight for market dominance is this is what it had with the w business beyond the or eternal political dynamite and the pillar of sticks in society. a symbol of arbitrary rule tool in the struggle for justice. taxes the right to levy taxes and the obligation to pay them both inherent in the sovereignty of nation states and their citizens. but what happens when the power of taxation is undermined

with won't pay tax session. so it's up to the 21st on the w. b this is the w news. asia coming up today, held hostage girls education in afghanistan taking to the streets. young women stand off to the taliban, but risk violence. the dangers of just attending secondary school for girls or even higher and deadly attacks pro.