teenagers shots getting a little help on its way through at 82nd minute finish from moccasin bots and gave mines respite from the onslaught. travelling fans celebrated as if they were leading. but by what done their tupa mozart made it 62 in the dying moments. just reward refine performance. job done, the union nozzles, men side. i message to the competition. and you are up to date coming up next dog film with a look at how brains form 1st impressions within a fraction of a 2nd of meeting someone. a michael ok for me in the rest of the berlin team. thanks for watching the country that will host the world. caught between transformation and exploitation. between education and tradition. between cosmopolitan flare and captivating wilderness. the portrait of

a desert state full of contradiction. guitar starts november 11th on d, w. ah no. hello, hello. hello lou, i look a would 1st impression and stressful. i. we know i can trust her, but not him. she's lying. and so is he that he seems reliable. and all the level of trustworthiness that you perceive in another person's face, even when they're complete strangers can predict criminal sentencing decisions, including up to capital punishment. arm can predict hiring decisions, free flanks at someone's face or the sound of their voice can affect our decisions . the bottle gathering information from facial and vocal cues has been fundamental to interactions. almost language has only been around for tens of thousands of

years. hipaa, which in evolutionary terms and it is no more than a blink of the. i don't know. your 1st impressions can be alluring, but often deceptive. i'm looking forward to tomorrow. i'll face and voice reveal a lot about us. out mood, our disposition, our health. a point to what's going on inside us and the cues they give can even be interpreted by artificial intelligence. english, this is in science for control number of science fiction has been predicting this development for age is a government of it. it's still hard to fathom. and it leaves us feeling the skeptical and uneasy because we're not used to middle hon. cover her for hulu . ah, we encounter strangers every day. and you face an unfamiliar voice. a unique

and distinct may express al individual ality, but they also help us decide whether we like the person and whether we accept or reject their advances. ah, decisions we make instantly, ah, but just a 100 seconds of exposure. people already made up their mind about trustworthiness and competence and dominance, but that making up their mind takes, you know, several hundreds of milliseconds, but you only need a very quick glance on their certain facial features. ah, even in a static photograph that convey ah levels of intelligence and that can lead to judgments and, and bias decisions. john freeman is looking at what happens in our brain after a short glance. it's someone's face. is theory. many of these instantaneous seasons

are based on learned stereotypes. the same applies to voices. pascal below continues to find evidence that we associate certain emotions and traits with how someone's voice sounds is she there? we see voices as her type of auditory face. we need just one word to form an opinion has a voice like this. welcome. since if i go, oh, is seen as inspiring and confident by most people, whereas this one also leaves the listener, thinking they wouldn't trust him with their money at bottom hello. hello. hello. hello, and what does science say do? we'll see the same thing when we look at someone's face. john freeman uses the special morphing program to get a more accurate, hanson, and he can also gender age mood and carry to traits subtly.

and if you asked hundreds of different subjects to judge the trustworthiness of these individual faces, you'll find that they're generally agree in terms of being highly correlated with one another. so the same faces appear trustworthy or relatively untrustworthy. across the board. generally, although we're all different, the result is surprisingly similar for everyone. at least if i asked if someone is trustworthy. the 1st impression is when we decide who we want to communicate, cooperate, or former close relationship with for is it surprising that people, i have these kinds of unconscious tendencies despite humans being such rational creatures? i would say not really, right? when we think evolutionarily about it, in terms of our evolutionary past, you know, before or we had verbal language,

right arm as non human primates. i'm nonverbal communication and using facial appearance using a choose of the phase voice embody, we're really critical, right? for survival, for the maintenance of resources, for a building social group, it can be attributed to our evolution ah, making instant decisions about who his friend or foe greatly increased our chances of survival. as pack animals, we've always formed communities long before language played a role. humans developed a keen sense of how those around them felt and being able to read the room is a huge advantage. if someone in the group is scared, your own life may also be in danger to if someone is seething with rage, you pluck hate them or run. ah, our brains are still wide the same way to day. as soon as we encounter someone new,

we immediately attempt to establish whether they are with us or against us. 2 look what to what extent to these 1st impressions actually alter our behavior that bustle. the evidence shows that they have a strong impact, sophomore in the back to the force, a police officer, they predict all sorts of downstream social outcomes and real world consequences. and so, you know, when the findings like faces that appear more competent are more likely to be, are elected to senator and governor positions in the united states. and even presidential candidates are more likely to win in united states. thompson, looking managers and attractive people, a paid more, and defendants who look untrustworthy. i given long sentences but what about our voices? we can here find nuances of confidence, dominance incompetence to even if they have little in common with the speakers.

actual personality, with beyond words of voice, also transports emotions and can even bring things to life. hope it's become real because we relate to like other human beings that used to put more oh city. it illustrates how we instinctively relate to a human personality. if it has a voice hook up available on it, and we're on a puppet, for example. and because of changing body cues and changing voice, vocal cues that the perception of the emotion, the perception of, ah, the person's or the, the puppets intentions are changed. oh yes, let me in the i said just a little bit generous to sympathetic. i'm been hearing

our brains create real people from the voices they hear even when the people aren't real happy. because she didn't, once you give a machine a voice, it gets a personality as if it were human machine conscious. if anyone, it's an automatic reflex is auto magic. there was just came out good decal, duncanville and research shows that people's feelings change if their computer, if car or coffee machine has a voice in the company to said, well, the bulk of acoustics we give machines could even determine how we interact with them. it did tell me not to tell them, and they'll don't as you want the other clinician for how to wake up wake up. how can i help you? what can you do? you can, for example, ask me to introduce myself or to chat a little. can you introduce yourself? i'm a firm at robot, a social robot bill to interact with people in the same way you interact with each

other. so i can smile and nod. gabriel's cancer is one of the creative dispersion process. top of the robot was launched in 2011. i looked a bit more crude back then with cable sticking out from my head. they came up with the idea to cover the cables with a fur hat. and that ladies and gentlemen is where the name for hack comes from. i don't really need my for had anymore. i look pretty as i am. don't you think? i don't know what the original interest comes from really? i think it's a very fascinating idea of creating and, and an agent that interacts like a human and behaves like a human. it's fascinating by sound, right. but it's also again back to the idea that if we can do that, we start to get the better understanding of how we as humans work in the future. gabriel's cancer want for her to behave like a human during

a conversation. but as soon as scientists try to transfer our human behavior to machines, it quickly becomes apparent how complex or behaviors are. but i'm originally you like being on today for that is supposed to make small talk robot search just a way on its own, for responses. what did you, what do you mean by that? and you are quite stupid re, ruth, is this a for so i have no idea what the optimal say next. so it's, it's, it's a surprise for me what it's s. and it's been fascinating to see how the conversation on post although the conversation takes an expected turns, her head has already mastered the basics. when to speak, with a conversation partner is looking at how much i contact is appropriate from the

scientist program. so with a whole range of emotional facial cues. however, the find a difference is we express using mimic and our voices are proving trickier. so as humans, for example, we have this micro expressions. so my eyes move a little bit all the time. i make small movements with my face, and we want the robot to have those small movements, old, so otherwise it looks very robotic and not very human like. so we think that the face is extremely important and the way we give feedback to each other and everything is expressed through the face, but also through the voice and, and the way the tone of our voice and so on. that's why it's so difficult for fair to react appropriately. the same word or the same sentence can come across very differently depending on the mood, the occasion or the person we're talking to. unfortunately, there's no use the manual for humans that fur hat can learn from. yet anyway,

there's plenty of cases where, you know, a face can be identical and the same features, but the context, the body and the voice dramatically changes how we understand that person. there's all sorts of different kinds of cues. in terms of intonation, pitch, contour, or format, characteristics that change how we perceive other people's voices, the emotions that they're feeling, their intentions. how do we read moods? mark shreds is researching how tiny movements in our facial muscles can influence our communication with. ready the eyebrows, cheeks, lips, and chin all contribute to forming very different types of smiles with face subtle because it has to do with micro expressions that you see around the i region

or the mouth region. or you can fake a smile. like if i, if i do this is fake manner. you can see that the birth is pretending to be happy or being cynical or sarcastic, but it's not revealing what, what, what his or her true sentiments or emotions are. and it's not only smiling, it's so also in the, in the very subtle movement of eyebrows. the very subtle movement of blinking a recent u. s. t. v shows focused on body language. lightman protagonist of the crime show lie to me. he was an expert in micro expressions who believed facial expressions could expose lies and suppressed emotions. huge shame and shame, contempt. these expressions are universal. can we really identify

every single emotion just by practicing? some scientists think. so apparently, all we need to do is consciously notice each millisecond long facial expression. the results are used in market research to find out which commercials and most effective, especially trained security teams at airports. also analyzed facial cues, support potential terrorists you will release at easy to tell when criminals align spending. hollywood wants us to think so. 43 muscles combines produced possibility of 10000 expressions. now, learn them all. you know, polygraph how much that we spend on this damn project, but the scientific world takes a slightly dim. if you, in real life, it's often much harder to do. so, for instance, that explains it from your micro expressions. you can see.