all of the story that matter to you with we are here is actually on fire made for mines. it's almost a year since russia invaded ukraine with no peace talk. so c, spire of any kind in prospect. and yet, president putin insist the war is showing a positive trend. my guess this week from moscow is dimitri training for my army officer and former director of the carnegie moscow center, which was shut down last april, with tens of thousands of its soldiers killed the little progress on the ground. the criminal is taking its own survival on the outcome of the war in the minds of

and i think a lot of people around him. we are in a go on in which russia is very existence. is the state. but why did moscow go to war? just as the west of the gun, the dialog putin has been demanding and has moscow now move the world once and for all from nuclear deterrence, to nuclear blackmail for me pretending welcome to conflict zone. thank you very much. it's a pleasure to be with you. we've had almost a year of war in ukraine, tens of thousands of people, dad, many thousands more injured, mass destruction and misery. what good has any of this brought to russia? there's no good that that's, that's obvious. the issue is there should have usually been prevented. but it wasn't, and that makes it the real tragedy. as russia now bitten off more than it can chew

. russia certainly confronting the most difficult issue militarily, politically, socially internationally. something that i think very few people thought that it would have to confront. but it's coping it's learning. it's improving things, but it's hard. it's going to be hard for, for quite some time. i'm sure you say it's coping and improving things. what should we read into all the changes of command desperation, kremlin anger at the failure so far? i think that would be very superficial. there's certainly any amount of anger you can imagine. although what's, what's happening on the. 2 ground in various places, but i think you should read into that and move to

a streamline the chain of command and to prepare for i think more decisive action. a lot of people in russia were complaining and are still complaining that russia is fighting with its hand almost tied behind its back. and that may change. whereas the new structure and i think a new strategy that lives behind it. moscow has been attempting to stifle criticism with the threat of up to 15 year jail sentences for discrediting the army. and yet the chechen leader runs on career often the gaining pre goes in front of boot in and had of the wagner mercenary group. they haven't meant that was have they isn't one law for the elite and one law for everybody else? well, i would put it differently. there's, i wouldn't call it one law,

but there's one approach to the people in be call it bakery arctic camp. and another one for the people who openly critical not only of the decisions by the commander in chief of the war of the war effort. russia is a country at war this time, even if it's officially a state of war, or martial law has not been declared in russia. but the reality is that russia is a war. so no effort is being sped. i think to make sure that this war with all their probations, misery, tragedies, and all that does not lead to any serious internal destabilization. and people on the other side are certainly working to instill a measure of large measure of destabilization into the russian social fabric.

yeah, but if even the patriotic crowd are saying things about russia, commanders, like all these boston, should be sent bare foot to the front with the magic guns, you tend to wonder how wide spread in moscow is that discontent with the way the war is being handled well, i think you should appreciate that very few people even a few years ago. imagine that there would be anything like this war for russia to fight. 10 years ago, the russian, the grand russian defense minister declared, basically that europe has ceased to be a potential theater of war for russian. and now russia is fighting a war. just imagine that wherever country whose population is believed to be officially believed to be in russia, but of the same people with russia. it's, it's just mind boggling that russia has been able to,

to fight their way because it has fought over the past 11 months, given the relations between the ukrainians and russians, given the relations between russia and the west. so, you know, i'm not surprised at the level of anger and mutual recrimination. and so what surprised it is, it's still held in check, but there's still very wide latitude that people enjoy people on the right side if you like that, that these people enjoy when they discuss things on the battlefield and discuss things at the head for us. it doesn't limit the whole thing is not limited to just the meat to amend your mention. but the whole array of a walk or respondents using the freedom, freedom of speech to the hilt,

i would say. but what's left of it? then you'll get on the free press hasn't been a huge well look i wouldn't want to, to engage with you in a discussion about the freedom of the press of the media. i have a very critical of that, whether in russia or outside of russia, i'm not talking about that. but if you were to read, if you were able to read russian and read a telegram channels that are both available to all citizens of russia, you'll be surprised that how much criticism sometimes justified, sometimes unjustified. you will hear you will read actually on those telegram channels. to be true trying to has russia underestimated the west determination to

help you crane or is it still cling to the idea that in the end, nato will lose interest and leave ukraine to its own devices? well, i think that the initial concept of the special military operation was very different from what has been unfolding since may be early march of last year. and had russia been able to achieve its goals? were there a couple of weeks, a couple of months there, and i think they would not have been that much that their west would have been able to do to support kids. so there's, there's been supported k f that it couldn't achieve its goals movement. well, not really, i think that the, again, i don't know what the original concept was, but it looks like it was, it was more of a special operation going

a military one. and that i think was be was the cause of what happened after that. but this is water under the bridge. i think the certainly one thing was not anticipated that the west would steal colette freeze on band confiscate russia as currency reserved in, in, in western currencies. and that, i think was not appreciated, that the west would be able to do that because that was thought to be, you know, over over a certain line that the westwood would do. and that money was but not hold back before the start of the operation. so that's what. busy what do they expect the west, they're just complain a little and forget about it to use whatever means where their disposal to show

that for the russia was causing them. if you go back. 2 and read what was written in the western newspapers at the end of $21.00 and early $22.00. when there was a lot of discussion of an imminent russian attack against your grade, that people didn't go nearly as far as what we're seeing today. people, but talking about switching off switch for russia and things like that. it's interesting that maybe the west was sort of lowering russia. ukraine by professing to do intend to do too little to help your grade. i don't know. well, this is a joke. i still, i just don't think that the west at that time, that intricate a strategies of russia and your grade. but russia give them the west, a big boost and in particular, it's given nato. a big boost hasn't gotten what it didn't want out of this up

around so far. yes, that's true. that's true in a way, but not in a very big way, because just frankly, russians have long thought russians. i mean, those russians make decisions. those russians who are the russians who run the place, those russians have long assigned western europe, or all of europe outside of russia to, to the u. s. camp mr. book to call your pm countries battles of the united states. so there were no big surprises, except maybe one that germany was shooting itself in the 4th by revising its energy policy and ruptured energy links with russia. that's, that was perhaps the only surprise that people that people match in this. this done . you tell people on february the 24th so long as the war last,

i won't say or write a word, but good harm, the russian army, its leadership, or the commander in chief. does that mean you repudiate all the critical views of putin that you express before february 24th? well, i spend by everything i have written before the 24th and after the 24th. i will go your own record as telling the spiegel correspondent, the russians intervention, to support the dumbass rebels, was the most serious mistake of futons foreign policy. do you still think that? well, let me, let me tell you this. i'm sure that mr. pooty believed that i was not working for russia when he made that decision there was certainly a need to do something about. busy about ukraine,

about don bass. busy and i think that was coming to a decision, but the, the original concept of the operation, i don't know what it was, but it seemed to me was flawed. and i think this is something that a lot of people today in russia ship. but as i said, this is water under the bridge. this is not the time to criticize the. busy the commander in chief where we faced the situation in which the west, the combined west, as you said, is up in arms against stuff and well in the proxy war against the united states and its nature partners and some other countries. and that's the reality in which you operate. i'm wondering, to what extent russia could have avoided this war if it wanted to. in january last year, you told comment that

a dialogue with the west was underway for the 1st time you said since talks on german reunification, the west has agreed to discuss european security with russia. the united states and nato have been negotiating european security with russia. so the security rest on 2 pillars rather than one. why launch a war then when the process the russia had wanted and demanded was actually on the way. well, i sent for mr. horton and for the russian general stop. the key question was whether the west would entertain and that they decide on the idea of no need to a membership for ukraine and no need to present in ukraine. that was chief of been keen for both, but, but in your view, before the war started my, my,

your well, in my view and i expressed in various ways, including in a book that was published a couple of years ago that i believe that russia is both soviet foreign policy, 2 things were, were damaging, were good, could, would qualify as, as huge mistakes. one is the russian policy toward ukraine, which essentially was no policy and reliance on money, essentially. and your connections with a few people which again to me the did not amount to a policy. and 2nd, the the preoccupation where the nato enlargement, in my view of the best way to, to respond today to enlargement would be to, to oppose the united po, to, to what the united states of the same position of perio that russia would be put

due to nato enlargement, but just to be clear, but just to be clear on that, if you, you were saying in january that you didn't believe nato expansion was any great threat to russia. when i subbed that, i would stand by that today. but it, let's say, in historical way we are worn out in prior to 24 february. well, they're not at war. and a lot of things could have been done differently, including, and i think primarily by the west which day, why not. and again, my point was go through, right. and which the freedom of discussion before decision mistaken. and now that a national decision has been taken, you abide by that decision because it's everything that happened before

24 february was over, over, over a different of a different value after the 24th. but my point is that all the reasons that russia has given is given many reasons for why it began this war, including nato expansion. don't hold water to that. that was the charge that ukraine was engaged in, genocide, that's what put in said he said, what's happening in the dumbass, today's genocide turned out to be a false accusation. did that the case went to the un highest court? the i, c, j was thrown out last march. court said it had been no evidence to support russia's claims. russia ignored the ruling. damn. there's a tragedy to a major population. in 1962, the united states was ready to go to war to nuclear war with russia. but

soviet union then overshoot your missiles in cuba. although you would agree, i think with me that mr. crusher was not planning a nuclear doctor, just the united states, wrong few about positions, he was only looking for a balance over the past year. since you raised the nuclear issue over the past year, russian officials have kept up a pretty constant drum beat about rushes nuclear weapons. does russia really want to move from deterrence, nuclear deterrence, to nuclear black male? well, i wouldn't call it nuclear blackmail because you make all the time and she knew what the times is. blackmail in a way. well, this is, this is a much more dangerous game. this is do what we want. well, alice isn't it is what else?

yes, yes, but if you look at that from the russian angle, and again, i do not invite you to do emphasize where, where, where the russian. but just look at that from the russian and go to them. are war is being waged against russia and part of the territory that used to be russian. that is, love you later by russia people, many of them is not an excuse is not an excuse, but we're not, we're not in the court. we will not be sitting in a war if sure. it's a totally different ball game. a lot of people would like russia to be sitting in a court. i know. i know. i don't think that they will be rushing the dock, but let them have their dream. do you believe russia is actively considering 1st use of nuclear weapons in this? let me, let me tell you this. present. not so long ago. raised the question whether the russian nuclear

doctrine should be revised to allow for a. 2 preventive use of nuclear weapons. he then dismissed it in his conversation in the same conversation, at the very fact that he raised the issue, i think, suggests that there's something done about that. it's the whole business, the whole war in your brain is existential. for russia, and if you want me to quote book again, i will say that a while back almost 5 years back a half years back. the shut that well, we're not interested in a well without rush in the minds of potent and i think

a lot of people around him. we are in a zone in which rushes very existence is at stake. so i would dread very carefully. i don't see why russia's very existence is, is at stake. i can see why you cranes it if russia leaves the theatre of war and goes home, the war is finished. if you crane stops fighting, ukraine is finished. that they're the ones who are facing existential risk. not you, you started the war. well, you know what? i mean, suppose ukraine, which i think was written in the cranium doctrine. suppose ukraine just for the sake of argument and started a war of liberation against russia, attacking crimea. and the park of don bass. that was outside of control,

and ukraine would have said that we are not attacking russia. we're just finishing up the war that actually started back in 2014 over crimea. and now if you just change the optics, i look at that from moscow from moscow position. then here, where does she russia using the same argument? can we just come back to the present because on the subject of nuclear weapons, are you seriously saying that put in might risk the survival of the entire planet just to get his own way in ukraine? that's pretty close to a definition of madness, isn't that him out? or i'm not suggesting that your expansion of what but basically saying.

so i think i don't know well where the. busy the high command, the commander in chief on those issues. but the country is data trying to win a war against a nuclear supa need to need to think about the potential of nuclear becoming, becoming used in that conflict. one way or another. i would because they've thought about you thought about it, but to comply that game, conte de when once once you, once you go to nuclear black mail, any fed can play the game. can you go from deterrents, which is to live a certain amount to many decades of stability and you move into a totally new and very dangerous game? is moscow really think it will take us there?

well, i will address the issue to those who supported your cranes anti russian stance. those who gave her their support to ukraine in 2014. and after that they were treading on the very dangerous territory. even though at that time, no one in the west were seriously considering or giving your cray nato membership. no one was prepared to sit down with russia and basically settled the issue without your grade becoming an aide, your country without ukraine. being a host to nato countries, forces and it started dorit. this was essentially the gist of book

news. i call it ultimate, i'm call it proposal, call it whatever you like in december 2021. and that was something that people did not wish to discuss. so they made a decision to risk it, and now they're risking it. how does this? and dmitri chan in ukraine, in whatever condition it emerges from this war, is never going to forgive. you never going to forgive russia for what it's done for the destruction and the death and the war crimes that it's committed on its territory. i don't know how it will end that many options. i think up given the stakes that are so much higher for russia, i think that russia will prevail over the rest to meet your tenant. good to have your complex out. thank you very much for your time. you're welcome.

ah ah, with

to the point to the strong opinion, clear position, international perspective, a shakeup of military brass points to read in russia's war effort, mounting failures, and a new top commander in ukraine at hint that a possible new offensive edition up to the point from when power struggle went in fighting means for prudence. war of aggression, ah,

30 minutes on d. w. thank. it's taiwan. the tail of a digital democracy despite a checkered past and the island has emerged as one of the most dynamic democracies in asia. the key reasons for this are the internet, new technologies, and direct citizen participation. can they help taiwan achieve its sovereignty? in 75 minutes on d, w o. every detail for us and for our planet. global ideas is on its way to bring you more conservation. how do we make

cities green or how can we protect habitat? we can make a difference global ideas. the environmental series in over 3000 on d, w, and online india a land of contrasts of ambitions of inequality ah 75 years ago. mahatma gandhi peacefully led the country to independence. provide deals with what is remained of his vision. ah, what's the status of human rights and social justice in what's called the world largest democracy? ah,

with this is the moment unleash on violet pass and re imagine these teachings or elements to us. ah, gandhi's legacy starts january 28th on b, w. ah, this is date of the news, and these are our top stories. germany's new defense minister borrowers historian we're has hosted his us counterpart, lloyd austin in berlin for talks on ukraine. they're meeting comes ahead of nato consultations on friday at which countries are expected to make critical decisions about further military aid to cave. germany is facing mounting pressure to allow

allies to say.