tv Arts.21 Deutsche Welle February 5, 2023 2:30pm-3:01pm CET
2:30 pm
many is to become a new meeting with an old church in a new role. in 60 minutes on d w. m. what secrets lie behind these walls? discover new adventures in 360 degrees. and explore fascinating world heritage sites. d, w world heritage. 360. get the out now. oh, artificial intelligence has taken the creative world by storm making things possible that artists could previously only dream of been much install wasn't got them. and if machines are smarter than humans, the machine has the power. do we want to give the machines the power to control us because i don't think so. no one's those. these all will algorithms. so be doing
2:31 pm
the work. a creative artist become redundant. yeah, i think they are replacing artist plots. i don't think it's necessarily a bad thing where some see a great opportunity. others see an acute danger. i can be good and can be bad, like every technology which drones you can kill or you can amazed people. and it's, it's our choice. what we do with at the 2020 to venice b and ali ada caused quite a stir. she's the 1st humanoid robot to make her own art. with the help of artificial intelligence, her inventor, a british gallery director aden. mellor developed her with a team of computer scientists, will box experts and designers. ada receives the environment to cameras in her eyes,
2:32 pm
algorithms process the information and provide impulses for drawing. the robot then single handedly determines her creative output without any human intervention. is love us mansion, i'm home. i think what fundamentally interested people about robotics and artificial intelligence is that it's like a replica of themselves. it has something akin to a divine function. good to hear for sure men and creating intelligence where i'm creating another human being mentioned, and i think that triggers the age old human longing to play. god diesel donna got to finish. ah, should we fear robots or welcome them? hello robot is the name of the exhibition at the vitro design museum in the german town of bi alarm rhine. it focuses on our fascination with robots and artificial intelligence. a i for short,
2:33 pm
and the tense relationship between man and machine. austrian, emily climb curated the show, which has successfully toward the world. take a look. he had the me and it popped in. technology has quoted everything in our world like a thin layer of color. that's just a fag turnville and there's no turning back now that the genie is out of the bottle . that's why we have to keep asking ourselves as individuals and as the society or how we want to implement this technology, they can look in the industrialized world can no longer function without its intelligent machines. but the outlook for the coexistence of humans and robots, the swings between you, topic in dystopic, between hopes for a better mechanized world and fears that human agency will get lost them in all other standish. we have a robot who writes manifesto it was like, so i think that intellectual work as we know from politics or arg to them over. but that robot is as dumb as a door knob that can, it knows the vocabulary, grammar, and syntax. and it has no clue about what it's writing. hardly any other phenomenon
2:34 pm
has captured the imagination of the movie industry as much as the vision of artificial beings then not only have an uncanny human appearance, but also far superior abilities from metropolis to 2001 and blade runner to matrix science fiction films, including many blockbusters have explored humanities. uneasy fascination with robot androids and artificial intelligence escaped feely, philip ashby, la, fer constituent there. so many examples of artificial intel tested a found their way into our brains and hearts through pop culture have shaping our image of robots and a i think, against breaking the thing. that's why we're always disappointed when we come across real a i or robots because they're usually nowhere near as cool as the ones we know from louise and bugs. but we're do the boundaries between a i and human creativity lie. will machines managed to crack one of the last
2:35 pm
mysteries and are increasingly technologies world how we feel emotions and turned them into art? my tail crease, director of the vitro design museum, is doubtful puter martina conklin name was jordan for machine cannot feel emotion also there between fits and no matter how much people insist that will eventually be able to produce sent in machines. they won't have the emotions of a human being group and those emotions are reflected in any good work of art, whether it's a painting and a design object or a great building autonomy. it's an irreplaceable factor. is an fuck jordan, then couldn't finish this. ah ah, but what can and can't machines learn artist leon live in trout offer some insight . he started painting as a child, and by the age of 16 was celebrated by the art world as
2:36 pm
a prodigy and sensation earning the nickname baby picasso. he's one of the most successful german painters under 30, and famously willing to chart new ground in their coin beneath when phosphorus one does one. 0, i find it incredibly exciting to combine these 2 components for the other sequence of that is pairing art with artificial intelligence. when in order to bring the art to another level and break new grounding, making it even more innovative. he gets dean could not innovative us and of course also to keep up with the time was at sight. so good, lay on live and trout as taking part in a study that investigating the question, what do artists feel when they paint what goes on in their brain during the creative process? for this purpose, the master class of the virtual design program at kaiser latin university of applied sciences measures his brain wave neuro feedback shows that when he's painting he enters the kind of trans hm. than ever be whose dog no foster comes in
2:37 pm
. we captured data from his movements and brain waves and the brush strokes he made fast gum thongs of we recorded sounds and basically everything that could be turned into numbers, windows done, and then we used algorithms to create data from all of that to visualize the image is what is yours and immersive spatial installation has been designed using the collected data. the artist creative process can be experienced by means of an interactive surface. this gives the public a haptic sensation of how it feels. it's not thinking indian can't even put it thought that goes into the creative process. the abstract expression and energy i always have approaching my painting is something that many people underestimate the unseen thing. thus i offered the physical toll it takes on the body, but also on the brain of a good. so it's really a massive effort, mentally as well doing this intensive creative work for hours on end. he got buston,
2:38 pm
docile intensive. so i'll bite, ah, in the future the artist could possibly save himself all that effort. because artificial intelligence will make it possible degenerate algorithms of leon live and treads creative process and visual language. using data obtained from the study and produced images in his style. as gifted begin, aviana, did you begin to clear there are parts of the brain that maps certain creative work and processes. leo installed. so theoretically you could have leon's, dreams interpreted and generate an image of them the next morning and bus yet did not get haunted. but leon live in trouts creative process is still that of a typical artist. he draws sketches and applies acrylic paint to the canvas without high tech, but with dedication and passion. but could a, i create something similar or even better,
2:39 pm
momentum british for hope 9 right now i would say no, not yet all, but i'm careful about predictions as to what might happen in coming years in your pocket because a, i is absolutely powering ahead and i reckon this whole topic will be surprising us a lot, but also in team open. so what would art made by a? i looked like a brand new. rembrandt spat out by a computer in 2016. a new painting by the dutch master was unveiled, created with a eye and fed with data from 346 of his works, a team of programmers, designers, and scientists from the delved university of technology and a i, experts from microsoft, developed countless algorithms to calculate proportions colors, shien light and shadow and substance with u. v inc from a 3 d printer like oil on canvas. 148000000 pixels amounted to a portrait of
2:40 pm
a man between 30 and 40 years old, with a beard, hat, and color, and amazing result. but is it really art? dutch artist lanika, go dine, uses a i to explore relationships between humans, nature and technology. i believe that art is a reflection on society and poses a question. and i think a, i can also ask questions, but are they still meaningful? i think artist will reflect probably on a i, and that will be totally true art. the sad thing about artificial intelligence is that it lacks artifice, and therefore intelligence much has changed since john boldly art made the statement in 2018. the painting edmund bellamy became the 1st a i generated artwork on the market, painted by an algorithm,
2:41 pm
stead with 15000 portraits from various periods. it was the 1st ai artwork to be sold by christies. it earned some $433000.00 for the french art collective obvious, which provided the invented des, bellamy family tree gold frames, and the algorithmic formula in lieu of an artist signature. but when the machine is trained on millions of images and sophisticated algorithms create works of art, who deserves the credit a i, the programmer and the board, the art, an artist that provided the data like picasso, rembrandt, or van gogh a. i art raises many questions, not just ethical and legal ones for vincent breds who teaches at the berlin university of the arts. it's the myth of the artist that matters. but his mom did call her when his vice, that was one bask yet if i buy
2:42 pm
a painting knowing it's my boss got one, i'm more willing to spend a lot of money and look at it for hours. imagining him painting it in new york area than if i see exactly the same picture knowing it was only created by a computer algorithm. nixon, i don't just look at the pure result, but i buy the story and the person a little little closer to you. she's too deep as wouldn't be submitted. but what exactly does an algorithm create? what can a i do? a, i is the machines ability to imitate logical thought and creativity once unique to humans, robots and machines are the hardware. while a, i is the software standing in for the brain, machine learning allows a i to continually develop, improve, and deliver results on its own. almost in real time. humans 1st be the a i large amounts of data in the form of algorithms, rules that telecom shooter what to do the technology brings an unprecedented level
2:43 pm
of speed, precision and efficiency. but what about creativity? glover does transmission till again, i don't believe that artificial intelligence will replace the emotions of art and creativity any time soon and come abuse of an excess to be teeth, often fussy, and include this pure creativity comes partly from encounters with different cultures. and people and journeys fuel and dimensions for the anchor and the artist brings all these emotions to the canvas. so i don't think i will ever completely replace the human artist couldn't star as it's invert. like a child, a eyes 1st artistic endeavors were doodle. british artist, a computer scientist harold cohen, 1st developed in a i controlled drawing machine. in the early 19 seventy's, erin imitates human hand movements with a robot and paints its own pictures. the 1st simple shapes were in black and white
2:44 pm
. since the 19 ninety's more complex and in color over 40 years until his death in 2016 harold cohen developed his art and technology raising the question. if what aaron is making is not art, what is that exactly? i had then dipping the kn conan, even if we can create pictures that are super food or realistic or look like van gogh or other works that look completely original and groundbreaking diving. ultimately, we are also discussing the question of what's real and what isn't tal and if hi good versus how can we create our own work visit i'm it was listed at the law bed. so how can a i be used as a creative tool? recently a i has been advancing rapidly in the field of image processing and generation
2:45 pm
freely available text to picture systems like does e and mid journey have caused a collective earthquake? it has never been easier, faster or cheaper to create digital images. up at the berlin university of the arts, vincent brits discusses the latest developments with the students in the artificial creativity seminar. doubtless come on disinfect, you can compare it a bit to when there was only classical painting. and then suddenly the 1st photographers appeared who often dug up and there was certainly resistance. and people said it was an art, it was a photo, plagiarism, whatever. huh. hm. and then over the years and decades, the idea of a photo artist became established in con, i think it'll be the same with artificial intelligence in fine. ah, artificial intelligence can colorize historical film footage in seconds. but the programs show their limits when it comes to processing complex artwork. the problem
2:46 pm
with this, i think, is that for example, if it's like an acoustic video and the grass was pink because you painted pink because it was an odd movie, would make a green because it's basically just working on an average right? complex image processing, like shading and lighting, is no problem for the latest generation of a i based graphics programs. what used to take hours or days to now be done in seconds. this is that to dispute or list us. it's threatening, of course that more and more people can generate an infinite number of images and the images i spend a lot of time creating no longer have the same value. like but at the same time, they're just tools to master and use wisely and embed in larger concept. signed programs like dally or mid journey are disrupting the traditional creative process . the tools are impressively user friendly enter text into the program. in
2:47 pm
a i spits out the command as an image. creativity has no limits. even of the artist to quality is sometimes doubtful. of their conflict perspective or as an artist, i find it more liberating and empowering to have new ways and tools to generate new imagery and new things. i still see it more as an opportunity and as a does these mass phones look on this one is funding victim, it's exciting that a designer no longer has to think about how to draw a picture. i instead you think about how to best describe it. so the computer can draw it legally, it's more or less the same job with that, but a completely different approach for the job of and against annette onions by the photos of people who don't even exist. every single pixel created by ai and dissembled from millions of photos of real people from the web of any of the vice via fungi, impossible for you. imagine i download all the pictures from your facebook profile
2:48 pm
and load them into artificial intelligence smith and tell it to create your picture . the unlucky unit on the i does no more than look at these pictures and generate an image of you that's about it doesn't process an existing image in and beautiful, and each pixel is based on the photos of you, but is its own creation. it was 9 and then it becomes difficult to discuss privacy rights uses. peasants cuts good. the students have concerns about data protection, copyright and ethical issues. and of course, they worry about a threatening their own careers. i cannot compete with this kind of intelligence. it will always be flawless, it will be always faster. on the other hand, they're our personality and our humanity. and our in perfectionists, is actually what makes us sometimes better from this kind of an artificial intelligence. what an ai can develop its
2:49 pm
own creativity. how does a i influence us? who's controlling who these were among the questions, addressed in a 2022 production at dresden opera house. the semper opa, chasing waterfalls is the 1st opera with a libretto and score co written by artificial intelligence. and featuring a virtual voice and impressive showcase for the technology, but humans, we're still in charge. right now we use mainly algorithms with a lot of different data inputs. but we still have some sort of control. and i find that really hard to think of a situation where the control is gone, but then also for me, the meaning is gone. deploying a i can be useful in a museum, for example, at the bell house archive in berlin. the company art plus. com used a i to make the comprehensive collection visually accessible. museum visitors can
2:50 pm
use a touch pad to navigate their way through 15000 images, fully immersing themselves in the archive. berlin bay studio on formative makes 3 d models with a i. the process of what it calls a i sculpting. it's sold by humans, but not the result. the project demonstrates that artificial intelligence augments its learning quickly, improves continually and delivers unforeseen sculptures of equality that surprises, even the creators themselves. once the computer is got control, we might never get it back. if we're lucky, they might decide to keep us as pets. entire galaxies of artificial intelligence float above the compound of the u. s. space agency nasa, an artwork developed by lanika gord, dine and ralph nowadays of studio drift. with the help of artificial intelligence.
2:51 pm
hundreds of drones swarm and patterns in the heavens. reflecting the natural intelligence of a flock of birds flying and moravian studio drifts. award winning work has been admired all over the world. studio drifted phased in amsterdam. the 2 artists work at the interface between technology and nature. together with a 70 member team. delicate complex sculptures of light are created out of dandelions that have been fitted with ellie dees. studio drift creates art that shows high tech can be beautiful and poetic if you think about the classical artist, you know, making imagery or i yeah. working in a way that reflects to boss styles. the i think a are is replacing artist parts. i don't think is necessarily a bad thing. you know, because artist, in my opinion,
2:52 pm
good artist sugars should create a new vision of the future. studio drift also provided airborne art for the 5th anniversary of the l philharmonic in 2022. more than $300.00 drones rose into the night sky and sparkled above hamburg. the concept of delight installation was inspired by the location and architecture of the iconic concert hall. unfortunately some of the breaking waves stars literally made a splash weather due to external influences or technical problems. during the rehearsal 15 drones fell into the water at the premier, 5 more fell to earth. further performances of the light show were cancelled for safety reasons. every one involved was disappointed. everything that is digital can develop really fast because she can feel without real consequences because she
2:53 pm
can make the failures in a safe environment. but actually creating, ah, you know, an impacts of a i, in the real world. that is way harder, and we as fiscal artist no doubt our, our process, our way slower because we only make physic work and that have to be saved, that have to be maintained and have to work for very long periods of time. studio drip is now working on a commission from google quantum ai. the aim is to visualize how a quantum computer works. it processes millions of times faster than a conventional p c. the reason for its speed is that it carries out calculation steps simultaneously rather than in a sequence. a bit like a tree with many processes like growth and photosynthesis taking place at the same . i'm a limitless, there's no limit that's, that's the scary parts. like we, we can't comprehend what it can become, you know, like there's no control 0. it is
2:54 pm
a form of evolution. it's just like a next life form that we, we can't imagine what it is like, a monkey can't, cannot imagine our skill set. and what we can become like, same for us where they are google quantum e i is based in santa barbara, california, highly sensitive quantum computers are developed here in this high security compound, the mega computers, enormous processing capabilities and speed will play a major role in the field of artificial intelligence in the future. they can already self problems that would take a normal p c, about a 150000 years to solve it's kind of like cheating in away. as you know, i protest is of humans at evolution of nature goes over millions of years. and this is just like skipping a couple of millions of years. artificial intelligence as the technology with
2:55 pm
unforeseeable potential. will it take us forward or annihilate us? and what role will it play in art? will it remain a tool of creative? or will it replace them at some point? will it not matter who or what creates a work of art, human or machine? like in a year to be surprised, or some ai creating an art piece that you know is just so out there we like this is a whole new arch style. yeah. but also next to that like, is that the right question to ask like, or who cares about arts? if we all, if we con, exist enrolled anymore because they are killing us to ensure a, i doesn't spin out of control. there need to be some guard rails, not just in art, but in politics to that's was mentioned, but we need to retain the work of humans. of course a robot might even be able to do better. but you, i want that. no, i don't. even if we humans are still flawed, i still want to negotiate with another human, to hammer out laws and
2:56 pm
2:57 pm
2:58 pm
you decide what really matters to you more shift. in 15 minutes on d w, micah phoenix from the ashes to pop art creators of the young pastor breathed new life into church remains. the historic building in central germany is to become an meeting from an old church in a new role in 30 minutes on d. w. o. devastated. how are we can with cars carried off money, effects of climate change?
2:59 pm
i mean, felt worldwide before a station in the rain forest continued, carbon dioxide emissions have risen again. young people all over the world are committed to climate protection. what impact will they have? because change doesn't happen on its own. make up your own mind. d. w. late for mines. a new month right year. we'll send a new cool smash. the end of a superpower. the collapse of the soviet union rushes more in ukraine. one years vision, can we take
3:00 pm
a look back and into the future in the new building? slowly in february on d w. a . ah ah, this is dw, live from berlin. after tracking it for days drifting high over the u. s. fighter jets shoot down a suspected chinese bible beijing warrants, there may be repercussions also on the program. pakistan's, former president and military rules are perez sheriff is dead after a long.
17 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on