prince, thanks, and i think they would be able to beat coal with that on their own. is it more pressure, more sanctions, more isolation against russia isn't. in this case, their elite would think what to do inside of their own country. so that with their own new policy, that someone might be willing to negotiate that to go. i mean, we are interested in battle. thank you. may be, may be a question in, in russian and to tv channel called freedom. the road now thing a bit of an, an unknown oh, senior living uncle, the they, they the channel. oh, really though that would be question in ukraine even though that's where i should a year ago and when they we and which hello world shocked me now as the forms k, a war currently still every one that's exactly what made it was holding a full norm he's like western partners to provide a study of their course to close the sky about your grade, at least, boy, at that point, everyone was telling that it's important at the same was about leal points. but leo

points are already new. pride 1000, which room will talking about the aircrafts, there's a lot of debates we can hear a lot of stay by 3 weeks ago, but i don't want us. preston july 20 said that they're not transferring the f one. are we going to have maybe not, they've 16 might be at $22.00. retros owe something new. we're able to avoid no victory day. i would like to finish answering the question, add 2 of the french journalist victory day is going to be the happiest day for me and not only for me, but for every ukrainian. and now why to your question? a yom regarding armaments, we have not disclosed those cowboys. i should know that a scott manasseh, they're at the different type of fir. ah, even more types of native weapons, sir. and we didn't have her. and it's understandable

because we're not a member of nato. and i think it's a great accomplishment that we started receiving at the 155 millimeter caliber of artillery high mars. so the sorts of armored vehicles, b, m, p, b, t, r's, tanks and what you and initially nobody even wanted to hear about the tanks. you were right, but then we found a moment, we've found a key and we did something with for was last autumn, we saw that we are capable to pay back our land. d, occupation of the heart give region was a crucial who was legal as well as her san d. occupation with vowed that we wouldn't have been successful with

in a receive in new types of weapons. i believe nobody in ukraine couldn't even fathom that. we would have patriots, but now we are receiving, held people believe in us and as a tank in coalition, this as a lengthy have to prop bob the motion. and it's a horrible to losing our defenders with so that is why expediting ah deliveries of weapons. expedite and delivery of not only air defense bought a counter you a these, the technology is the ah, but we'll see drones, et cetera. and a low, so air craft and our partners. and they know that we want to use that to

protect our sky, to protect our people and our infrastructure. and that is why we have we started working on it. i had a meeting with the prime minister of the united kingdom. and actually this meeting is an answer to the question, yet, why the ukraine stanza, the chances law receive in high level aircraft. so the training with the uh, the u. k. is starting, i had a meeting with polish prime minister and mr. motivate sky. today we are looking into training opportunities. we are negotiating while you were with us and i am because it requires training. but this as well. we're looking forward to comprehensive protection of our sky

financial times in the center. in the center, please. gillian debt, financial times a very quick question. you talked about the chinese piece proposal and welcomed some element of it, but it did not mention a toll the withdrawal of russian troops from ukraine given the views of the parliamentarians. does that mean the chinese piece proposal is dead in the water whiskers, eligible? de coral? good with you said it was going to be a short question to find a short answer. jenny, was i shook the show. i don't saying that to what china did was um, ah, an offer in it of itself. i believe it's only at this stage on whose

stereotype the worries taken place can do that. so we came up with an offer of our own. we came up with the piece formula i and, well, i think it was an important signal that china would you eat that one looks like is going to participate in it? yeah, that seemed as their views. yeah. as of now, i'm seeing this as the signal only, i don't know what comes in it's our side. i really want to believe that china is not going to supply weapons to russia. this is very important. this is priority number one you for me. and i'm doing my best to prevent that from happening. it is very important for us news because you know, it better the way things are, are for china now. then in a rush as embrace because, you know, there's this risk of the 3rd world war,

we wanted to keep it and you don't get it only after we see specific steps my door. will we be able to discuss them so far? i'm just seen an opinion she was the most important is territorial integrity and territorial integrity implies withdrawal of russian troops. if it's not there, that means it is not okay with us is the way it is written out. if this is what's implied, that there is no withdrawal of russian troops with prime minister, sweden colbin, no question. it was of china. i think it then i next on the legend sibley's here and to have prepared for negotiations in istanbul, and if fresh and present was to wait for you there,

would you accept that? are you from the turkish only ha, television turkish, a news agency in turkey. i just had a conversation with the president our event with for our press conference, we had a nice conversation. i expressed my condolences. you know that this is a tragedy for us as well. and the president reached out to me and we send to ukrainian specialists to help us out or we perceive this pain our as our own. i'm very grateful to president arden on for his assistance for his assistance. the, with the grain trade matter with z olva regiment, we managed to return some of the men that could have been executed. it

wasn't all of them, but still now president art again has done some things that a very, very useful to ukraine as well as i told to that too many other people, almost on i said to him makes your put in agrees to sit at the negotiation table we can not to, ah, we have a full scale war happened and he couldn't do it. but now he thinks he can, but we ah, no longer able to go for that. it's a different person. i may, i'd like to ask a question about the internal ha meta internal processes as the remember in 2021, a. d national defense and security council law funds. you should rules imposed

sanctions against 100 ukrainians. the so called black list, the u. s. black list of those were the people that were sanctioned there. and there were a lot of well known businessman hiring can officials in that list. but also some people were missing and that list and they should have been their us treasury imposed sanctions against him by dr. unfortunately, he's not to under sanctions now and you know, what kind of person he is, you know, that he's been and a ukrainian, a prosecuted by our ukranian law enforcement. so the question is, how can you explain that to a, during the 9th year of the war and 2nd year of the full scale war people from ya, nicole, which circles still have businesses in ukraine,

and it is not to sanction and a, well, what is but it just a minute. let's, let's answer. let's address this one. first of all, i'm not quite clear. ah, who you were talking about? well, every time the usaa, i gave us a list of person to sanctions to we would mirror that and sanction them. and if the person you're talking about is culpable, then no, we will look correct ourselves. but you have to be a clear that we're talking about hundreds of people that were sanctions. i cannot have information and it is you can put down of skis and

we had, remember what happened and what didn't happen either you understand what i'm talking about, right? which was i just wanted to hear from you what happened exactly. please ask a question because you could use my phone. oh no, i mean, was there a talk of replacing the minister of defense raised new club in particular mr. booth? donna a was a candidate, but he wasn't appointed due to some reasons. well, the reason was that it's only the civilian has to be a minister of defense and that a make in as a supreme commander in chief with regards to the security and defense of our country is something that i do not discuss publicly. some of the decisions, one of those decisions is security situations in some areas of the country and some institutions. i had some ideas. i'm not talking about the ministry

specifically, but rather about the infrastructure that is supposed to be a provide and security. and so i.