did the right thing, i think i did the right thing. having said that, i think you have to look up the balance here and act fairly. mr. linda. the broadcaster said that as a condition of his reinstatement, linux had agreed to stick to current editorial guidelines until a new policy for social media could be formed. of next doc film takes a look at the power off. the 1st impression is one, use a d, w dot com, as well as our social media handles at the w news. i am told me a lot ago. i cannot imagine how many portion of lunch are thrown out in the world. climate change giving off the story. this is my plan, the way from just one week. how my wife can really get we still have time to go. i'm going all with

what 5th? blue had no. hello, hello. hello lou, i look a would 1st impression and stress away. we know i can trust her, but not him. she's lying. and so is he. but he seems reliable along the level of trustworthiness and perceive in another person's face. even when they're complete, strangers can predict criminal sentencing decisions, including up to capital punishment, and can predict hiring decisions, free flanks, if someone's face all the sound at their voice can affect our decisions. the bottle gathering information from facial and vocal cues has been fundamental to social interactions. almost language has only been around for tens of thousands of years.

hipaa, which in evolutionary terms, and it is no more than a blink of the eye. although you don't have those, 1st impressions can be alluring, but often deceptive. i'm looking forward to tomorrow. i'll face and voice reveal a lot about us. out mood out disposition. i'll help i point to what's going on inside a sna choose. they give can even be interpreted by artificial intelligence. english . this is in science for control number of science fiction has been predicting this development for age as a government. but it, it's still hard to fathom. and at least as feeding, to skeptical and uneasy because we're not used to medicine. how does it have hulu? ah, we encounter strangers every day. and you face an unfamiliar voice. a unique

and distinct may express our individual ality. but they also help us decide whether we like the person and whether we accept or reject their advances. ah, decisions we make instantly, ah, but just a 100 milliseconds and exposure. people already make up their mind about trustworthiness and competence and dominance, but they're making up their mind takes, you know, several hundreds of milliseconds, but you only need a very quick glance on their certain facial features. and even in a static photograph that convey ah, levels of intelligence, and that can lead to judgments and, and bias decisions. john freeman is looking what happens in our brain after a short glance at someone's face. his theory. many of these instantaneous decisions are based on learned stereotypes. the same applies to

voices. past cannibal law continues to find evidence that we associate certain emotions and traits with hel, someone's voice sounds. it's ashville, we see voices as her type of auditory face. we need just one word form an opinion of voice like this in welcome. since the bible is seen as inspiring and confidence by most people, whereas this one leaves the listener thinking they wouldn't trust him with their money as hello, hello and know hello to science. say, do we all see the same thing when we look at someone's face? chunk freeman uses a special morphing program to get a more accurate and thought he can alter agenda, age, mood and character traits softly.

if you ask hundreds of different subjects to judge the trustworthiness of these individual faces, you'll find that they are generally agree in terms of being highly correlated with one another. so the same faces appear trustworthy or relatively untrustworthy. across the board, generally, we're all different. the result is surprisingly similar for everyone, at least for us, if someone is trustworthy. the 1st impression is when we decide who we want to communicate, cooperate or form a close relationship with the is it surprising that people have these kinds of unconscious tendencies despite humans being such rational creatures? i would say not really, right? when we think evolutionarily about it, in terms of our evolutionary pass, you know, before we had verbal language, right? as non human primates,

non verbal communication and using facial appearance using choose of the phase voice embody, we're really critical, right? for survival for the maintenance of resources. for building social groups, it can be attributed to our evolution, making decisions about who we or so greatly increased our chances of survival. as pack animals, we've always formed communities. long before language played a role, humans developed a keen sense of how those around them felt and being able to read the room is a huge advantage. if someone in the group is scared, your own life may also be endangered to if someone is seething with rage, you pluck hate them or run. ah, our brains are still wide the same way to day. as soon as we encounter someone new,

we immediately attempt to establish whether they are with us or against us. 2 look what to what extent to these 1st impressions actually alter our behavior, that before the evidence shows that they have a strong impact, sophomore in the back to the force, it pulls up wizard. they predict all sorts of downstream social outcomes and real world consequences. and so, you know, when the findings like faces that appear more competent are more likely to be, i'm elected to senator and governor positions in the united states. and even presidential candidates are more likely to win in united states. compton, looking, manages, and attractive people, a paid more, and defendants who look untrustworthy. i given long sentences, but what about our voices? we can here find nuances of confidence, dominance, and competence to even if they have little in common with the speakers,

actual personality. with beyond words of voice also transports motions and can even bring things to life. puppets become real because we relate to like human beings. ah. so used to put more a city. it illustrates how we instinctively relate to a human personality. if it has a voice or a potential origin and work on a puppet, for example. and because of changing body cues and changing vocal cues, that the perception of the emotion, the perception of, of the person's or the, the puppets intentions are changed. oh yes. let me in the eyes just a little bit generous t sympathetic. even in our brains create real people from the

voices they hear. even when the people aren't real sick, if you didn't, once you give a machine a voice, it gets a personality as if it were human machine conscious. if you knew it, it's an automatic reflex. issamottom ethic. there was just came out good nickel done in war and research shows that people's feelings change if their computer, if you car or coffee machine has a voice id, you're looking to said, well, the vocal acoustics we give machines could even determine how we interact with them . it did tell me not to tell them and they'll boys yema, voltaggio the clinician for how to wake up wake up. how can i help you? what can you do? you can, for example, asked me to introduce myself or to chat a little. can you introduce yourself and the fur hat robot? a social robot building interact with people in the same way you interact with each

other. so i can smile and nod. gabriel's cancer is wonderful, he's created latest version. the 1st prototype of the robot was launched in 2011. i looked a bit more crude back then with cable sticking out from my hand. they came up with the idea to cover the cables with her hat. and that ladies and gentlemen is where the name per head comes from. i don't really need my for her head anymore. i look pretty as i am. don't you think? i don't know what the original interest comes from really? i think it's a very fascinating idea of creating and now an agent that interacts like a human and behaves like a human. it's fascinating by its own right. but it's also again back to the idea that if we can do that, we start to get a better understanding of how we as human work in the future. gabriel's cancer want for her to behave like a human during a conversation. but as soon as scientists try to transfer our human behavior to

machines, it quickly becomes apparent how complex our behaviors are. but i'm originally from do you like being on today? fur hat is supposed to make small talk of robots such a way on its own for responses. what did you, what do you mean by that? you are quite stupid. ruth, is this a for? so i have no idea what the robert would say next. so it's, it's, it's a surprise for me, what it says, and it's a bit fascinating to see how the conversation on post. ah, although the conversation takes unexpected turns. her head has already mustered the basics when to speak, and where the conversation partner is looking. and how much i contact is

appropriate from the scientists to program. so with a whole range of emotional facial cues. however, the find a difference as we express using mimic and our voices are proving trickier. so as humans, for example, we have this micro expressions. so my eyes move a little bit all the time. i make small movements with my face, and we want the robot to have those small movements old. so otherwise it looks very robotic and not very human like. so we think that the face is extremely important and the way we give feedback to each other and everything is expressed through the face. but also through the voice and, and the way the tone of our voice and so on. that's why it's so difficult for 1st to react appropriately. the same word or the same sentence can come across very differently depending on the mood, the occasion or the person we're talking to. unfortunately, there's no use a manual for humans that fur hat can learn for all yet. anyway,

there's plenty of cases where, you know, a face can be identical and the same features, but the context, the body and the voice dramatically changes how we understand that person. there's all sorts of different kinds of cues. in terms of intonation, pitch, contour, or format, characteristics that change how we perceive other people's voices, the emotions that they're feeling, their intentions. how do we read moods? mark shreds is researching how tiny movements in our facial muscles can influence our communication with the eyebrows, cheeks, lips, and chin all contribute to forming very different types of smiles. her face subtle because it has to do with micro expressions that you see around the i region

or the mouth region. or you can face my like if i, if i do this in a very fake manner, you can see that the person is pretending to be happy or being cynical or sarcastic . but it's not revealing what, what, what his or her true sentiments or emotions are. and it's not only smiling, it's so also in the, in the very subtle movement of eyebrows. the very subtle movement of blinking a recent u. s. t. v shows focused on body language. dr. lightman, protagonist of the crime shows a lie to me. he was an expert in micro expressions who believed facial expressions could expose lies and suppressed emotions. huge school, shame and shape contempt. these expressions universe

can we really identify every single emotion just by practicing? some scientists think. so. apparently, all we need to do is consciously notice each millisecond long facial expression. the results are used in market research to find out which commercials and most effective, especially trained security teams at airports, also analyzed facial cues to spark potential terrorists. you will release at easy to tell when criminals align spending. hollywood wants us to think so. 43 muscles combines produced possibility of 10000 expressions. now, learn them all, you know, polygraph how much that we spend on this damn project, but the scientific world takes a slightly dim her feet in real life. it's often much harder to do. so for instance, our displays that from your micro expressions, you can see whether someone is lying or not. but that's close to impossible. so for

most kinds of people lie about something. if you're close to chance level, about guessing whether or not someone is speaking the truth or not. ironically speaking, if your life becomes more important, like if i'm lying about something which is which reading metrics like i have to hide something it's called the pink elephant effect. your queues to line become more, become clear for the other person. so the more you try your best, not to show that you're lying. the more likely it is that people will see that your life. how easy is it to tell when someone is lying? mark's face is looking to children, aged 5 and over for the and so yeah. the children are asked to tell the prince in the computer game, the truth open from the actual but lie to the dragon mouse

in the door. this supposed to help the prince hide from the dragon cameras and microphones record the children's behavior in an attempt to find any differences back after recording numerous children. the results highlight signs the point to lying. derek is a lot more. you don't do the slot when you look at the face when they're being truthful, they are very open. but they is kind of expression when they're being when they're lying and they have depression that they're being watched and being observed. you see that they have this sense i'm being observed and you can tell us from facial expressions around the mouth area, which is both more marked more mark kind of expression. then in the truthful condition, it's something about the voice. so when being truthful, they have

a very soft mobile, warm voice from the line. they tend to be a little bit more using creepy for like talking a little bit like this. but not every child showed the same cues. so it's not a reliable way to tell if they are telling the truth or not. ah, generally, we're much better controlling our facial cues than our vocal cues. every will produce is created by over a 100 muscles all working closely together with emotions all to muscular tension which impacts the tone of our voices. i. everything is controlled quite different parts of the brain. you're done with the muscles in the chest and

abdomen that create the required air pressure muscles and the tongue lips and face that vary the voice. and of course the larynx and vocal chords. the high, the pitch. when we become excited, for example, the faster they vibrate, does everyone hear the same thing? when a stranger talks to us, to we all come to the same conclusion in deciding if someone is trustworthy, extraverted or willing to try new things? parent schuler is conducting research using a range of different voices group. although the group doesn't agree on everything, the data shows some clear tendencies. artificial intelligence is being used to help identify them from if my terms minded, if he's of us. my theory is that if a human can hear something or a computer can pick up on it to own, go to have to vote order, but it becomes

a little spooky in when we got beyond what a human can spun. oscar grandmother mentioned one of us with her on printer. so we're now trying to assess whether the speaker has cove at 19 on our special hot class for yes or and minus for, nor would i, michelle minos covered no one's than 3 z nora. so no good. i've got one vote for positive. suddenly it was negative. the common to me is the next voice at her eyes. this is robert vonner. i'm and to lay up, we now have 3 positives and one negative doctor. i'm going to say positive. you're putting maurice newbies. yes, that's right. diagnosing cove, it by simply listening to someone's voice, sounds risky, at least when we rely on the human ear. at the start of the pandemic, we own schuler programmed a range of voices into artificial intelligence is a more accurate diagnosis now possible. drew on it from if this is the

a symptomatic negative cases, negative. have somebody written? so ross is the symptomatic positive k e in one of us, one of his most little suggestions you'd sent his elbow to renew his the hours complete cloud for we can see quite clearly on the right of the upper tired start for washington. as host of the news, ha ha, there are lots more signals we can use to gaming like the uncontrolled vibration of the vocal chords that leads to irregularities and the stimuli, and as of a certain throw to necessity breathlessness. is it of the cause as long a speech brightened you to one of the music opened into an old woman of play music an unknown friend? does it always kite? could last tom, the signaling of his passport and sadness wound upon these thing. the computer enough examples to reach a decision, the computer and differentiate between asked man, or

a call and entitled person candidate or to us ma, occurred on an upcoming dentist at least 85 percent of the diagnoses made by artificial intelligence were correct. small computers can also identify a d, h, d, parkinson's, house pharmacy, and depression by analyzing voices. anything that goes wrong in the body or brain impacts voices. to make a diagnosis, official intelligence looks at up to 6000 different vocal cues, and you take ology could allow diagnoses to be made more easily. and early on every word we say reveals more about us than we realize. and as listeners, we are influenced by the person speaking to us, subconsciously we relate the person speaking. we internalize their anxiety,

uncertainty, excitements, or happiness as if it were out of the air. it's attract the synchronization connects to people through mimicry. in general, mimicry is something that we do a lot in normal kind of conversations and it's reflected in the various aspects of our communication from the words we use the syntax, we use the property, we produce the in the nation and the temple, but also the non pro the communication, for instance, smiling behavior close to the relationship or desire for relationship. the more intensive subconscious mimicry become. we also mimic more strongly when we want to be like smile disappeared, signal

a person figure. something often does something happen. it in yourself. like if you, if you see a smiling person, you sometimes start to smile yourself. and so i don't know, maybe one of the attractive feature of the modem lease. exactly to do with that. like, there's something intriguing, something attractive about looking at the painting because she elizabeth smiled. she elicits happiness. we allow ourselves to be influenced by someone else's mood marks. fitz wanted to take a closer look. in this experiment, the speaker is describing something to her audience. her manner is animated and she smiles frequently. oh, oh, yes. here audience reacts. similarly, they smile back. not in agreement and give positive feedback. oh yeah, i was at least andy. but what happens when the same speaker repeats the process,

but more seriously, her listeners also look more earnest. i appear to concentrate more, and the reactions are more constrained. synchronization signals, empathy, an interest in the other person. how communication is successful, we tune into the more closely, and it's not just our facial cues that sink. it's our voices to try to express an emotion vocally that we're not feeling is nearly impossible to what transforms a voice into an instrument that can appeal to persuade or motivate other people with all of a needle has carried out numerous case studies and all have the same outcome, it's not what we say that counts. it's how we say it

and stim, it's an old lovely voice is an extremely complex, multi layered signal it on the bus was. evans will have information that we want to impart only to that, absorbing it to hard work from a cognitive point of view and strength. so we need to work on how we presented, as all emphasizing words can send a clear signal indicating which part the conversation or importance conduct need to consider short pauses to versus this dish versus one with dish. and in fact, argue people who communicate like this are regarded as more likable dylan is more visibly eoc, a mot. oh, that's it with. so it's all about how we use our voices to package the content that you know, one of the fun edition is performing a short test tracking of how well can his coworker present a text his reading from for the 1st time we're servers. as soon as the user is back in artificial intelligence is again used for analysis of the computer calculates

a score of 47.7. it splits the voice into 16 parameters, including speed, rhythm, melody, volume, and pauses. a score between one and a 100 for to stick appeal is then calculated out years prefer a varied pitch, usually around 2 octaves. charismatic speakers often switch between loud and quiet, fast and slow. the ad, the loves, it makes, the voice sambal melodic and their standards of dimes and the most of the money to century is principal has been used by populists and demagogues to capture the attention of audiences. because even ancient civilizations understood that the only way to motivate and inspire people was to get them to listen. don't wanted to public speaking, projecting and modulating your voice to achieve the best result was taught in

classic antiquity. now it's become of loss and skill. it is and also the monkey sample builder as a dust muslim bit actually, but i'm, it's possible to train your voice to transport information effectively. also from of what shots blouse, no difference to learning a new vocabulary, grammar, dimmer. ions was edson landon pies off to his green. all of the neighbor has developed a computer training program after 5 seconds. so they know that you have a pitch range, that the principle is fairly basic, right. the upper and lower lines showed the pitch when your circles and different colors in size represents speed, volume and pauses. ling to different. ah, yeah. what i really like to do is to try different food from different countries. and yeah, i really like spicy food also uses a showing what they can improve in real time in the golden time or meanings in the extra one day of training. the speaker tries again good chances to win and paycheck

errors by 90 percent saving band at school is 12 points higher than the previous day. how does your company handle the main improvements are in pitch variation clients? the honda pump, his score has sword from 34.5 to 73.3 that's almost doubled. his previous attempt of put op along continents on this app has not on it's a clear improvement time card process for remote employee. other voices a so seductive that we can lose ourselves in them. a check as shown in this experiment with some drivers were given instructions by this voice. what is eating that awesome fellow with like, wellness, nita and others by this slightly less engaging voice. closing this to us, and i was informed that meta massey of a nice booster ist, and that's of the what the drivers didn't know was that half way through the experiment. the sat and i've started giving incorrect directions. i've shown facia

on the got progressively worse, and he was breaking the pope and we wanted to see at what point the drivers would quit. that's actually citing us by the us. we were able to show that the more expressive, the more convincing voice kept drivers following the wrong route for longer as thought of the problem might have going against their better judge. luton advised them conflicts and when soon garcia i and we had to call them and explain it was just to test and ask them to come back. isn't fighting advising folks and will not have your annual from western song, saudi quality to lucas by the one test. an engaging voice plays a key role when it comes to flirting or meeting a romantic partner. hello. hello, i'm really beginning. really, willie will. i'm caught you now doula. oh, so i'm looking for a woman for the long term. i'm who's attractive was 1st, who do we desire? and we read it. we make snap judgements when it comes to one of life's most important decisions quickly and irrationally. it's ab judgements

are, have always thought they're really fascinating. it's sort of how we determined who we want to date, who we want to be friends with, or we don't want to be friends with. and we don't have a lot of introspective access to those feelings. we're drives that we usually encounter people and we like them or we don't like them and we have a good sense of that. we get along with them. and these things determine all of our behavior. are we old born with the universal cult? is it nature or nurture that allows us to interpret character traits and read emotions through facial and vocal cues? one thing is, certain, we react to these cues from a very young age. are we are just like our animal ancestors. i think it will. obviously primates never develop verbal language like

humans, just like us. they communicate vocally and they know how to interpret the signals. just as sheila prepared to show posters that's designed to sub i always assumed that there were huge differences between verbal humans and non verbal primate looking. but research shows that the auditory cortex and both species is more similar than expected, if it, whether verbal or non verbal. it makes no difference on how the brain processes signal skill login is su, gitmo level. lou haskell, the law has tested humans and primates using functional magnetic resonance imaging or f m r i book the results show that both groups react to their own species voice in the same parts of the brain. ready listen and we get our ancestors also

probably use these areas. 20000000 jessica primates process. vocal cues the same way we did. even without language it. oh, yes, no, she did do the brains architectural change slightly and humans to process language, and that's the coolest. picking it up, all miss it in, but the mechanisms have stayed the same in other species for anything beyond language we can migrate entity emotions. personality is latesha, vic in only multiple dismiss research into how primates interpret facial cues shows similar results. again, similar brain structures to humans are activated in the primates. does that mean that we are born with the ability to understand facial and vocal cues? of yours is 10 months old and is getting ready for an experiment?

ah, sorry, yes. and was to measure yours, his brain waves to see how he reacts to unfamiliar faces. can he already judge who's trustworthy and untrustworthy? and then i was to leave him after how many we carried out research where we showed babies a range of faces for 50 milliseconds. that's only a 20th of a 2nd one. it's so quick. we assume that babies wouldn't even registered the faces i taught since in however, we identified activity in the brain that prove the babies had not only registered the faces, but had even made the decision about whether they were trustworthy or not. but is it a night learned? ah, the video, nice stuff and all skin of anger ball. we don't believe that

a baby is born with the ability to judge whether face is trustworthy or not on the volume. and then it's more likely to be a combination of learning processes and, and inherent or early interest and pieces and one of the fluids because i'm interested in going to be over the 1st few months, faces and voices are a baby's most important learning resources. parents intuitively use pronounced facial cues, emphasize sit and words and exaggerate. this captures the baby's attention and allows them to recognize emotions more easily. why 6 months babies can already differentiate between happiness, fear, sadness, and anger. you want to play, i see. i'm still a bit sleepy, just like a child fur had his learning to understand us better and practicing how to behave

in a conversation. he analyzes the movements and eyes if his conversation partner using a camera. my name is gabriel, for it has to know whether i am talking to perhaps, or my colleague here. and so, and that's quite tricky. and we call that a multi part interaction. we are more than 2 people talking. and one of the ways of handling this is that we track the head post of the users. and so here we can see that the camera has detected as to here and can also recognize our faces. so if i turn around, look back, it will see that i am the same person still. it's time to play a game with fur hat gabriel. murph detain takes turns, drawing a shape. while the other players guess what it is? could it be star? no. is it the flower? yeah, it's a power got it. so my guess is further. now make

her as it were. i know peter snake. yes yes. ready this is a good one. for both he gets or is it about? her hat will look and sound more like a human over time. but he won't be identical. study shay, we prefer a clear distinction between humans and robots. oh, we find it to creepy. the boundaries are already blurred in the media. after 40 years, apa is back on stage. but in real life course, but as advertised, it's light time is simply passed the group. it's 70 year olds by only their voices, a still real exposed. we're at the start of a huge technological shift towards this. your technology. we are often asked to

record actors, voices is act of those kid is act ultima. i predict that over the next few years, these real life voice recordings will become superfluous socially to bump it. it'll kick isn't it? because we'll be able to create a new synthetic weiss's using his scientific principles. would you love it was issued the possibility. i don't know what you're talking about, how do i know that you and frank were planning to disconnect me and i'm afraid that something i cannot allow to happen. artificial intelligence making independent to see since we're still a pipe dream interact, stanley kubrick's day to day we live with it may be that's a good thing because i, i doesn't make emotional decisions or to come to luring voices. it's neutral and impartial and everything. when not, bryan you program in a i,

if they see that, you know, african american is linked with hostility and crime in media depictions in t v. and those are inputs into the i, the a i is going to pick up on that and act accordingly. you'll be shown a series of if so i is more like off the move, realize that enlighten me was shown how some faces are automatically linked to stereotypes. but it goes up to we're testing for racial bias, the races. they're all races. yeah. 80 percent of people who take this test are biased. we're just going to and science dictates the subconscious bias directly impacts opposition verification time for each of them. they leave a lot of collateral damage in the brain, right? it's not just a stereotype living in sort of a filing cabinet in the brain, right? they're changing, approach and avoidance tendencies, behavioral tendencies, motor tendencies, visual tendencies, auditory tendencies. john freeman is looking at exactly what happens using f. m r i . the test could be shown several different faces,

as well as the part of the brain responsible for facial recognition. other areas that process, social and emotional information are also activated. these areas memorize bias and personality traits. to provide a rapid response, our brains make fast prediction. we register what we perceive to be most probable this can often be adaptive, right? if you walk into a restaurant, you expect to see chairs and tables and a waiter, etc. you're not gonna waste a lot of metabolic resources. the brain time, the visual systems, resources and processing every single object in that space. you would generate a bunch of hypotheses, you know what a restaurant is, and you kind of run with those hypotheses. and you use expectations to fill in the gaps of the brain is too lazy to figure out itself and doesn't want to re weigh

some resources. so are we merely at the mercy of these mechanisms? john framing refuses to accept this theory. he's carrying out research to find out how we learn the stereotypes and whether we can and learn them. he shows the test script range of faces linked to specific character traits. so given all that, we wanted to explore our capacity to rapidly acquire completely novel facial stereotypes out of thin air. he bull that have a wide cell in width, which is the nose bridge on the face and at the queue that really has nothing to do with anything interesting. it's just simply the how wide the bridge of the nose is . so it's an arbitrary facial feature and 80 percent of the time we're pairing this wide fell in with trustworthy behaviors. so now they see completely new

faces, not the ones that they had previously learned about. and that have wide and narrow saelens that arbitrary facial feature. and indeed what we found was that on a variety of different measures, more conscious, less conscious that people are applying these stereotypes. they are automatically activating the stereotypes without their conscious awareness, from just a couple of minutes of learning in a brains highly flexible when it comes to stereotyping. we can learn to evaluate faces differently, at least over the short term. john now looking into a training method that works long term. the same principle applies to voices. ultimately, the more we know about these mechanisms, the less susceptible we are to being deceived by 1st impressions, a simple milton pursue. first impressions. fascinating, sometimes deceptive,

but always a special, even magical moment may be the start of a new relationship will be discovered so much more than will be sore at 1st sight. ah ah, ah kickoff. what's going on here? what is he doing? who do they think they are? good questions. you can find the answers here. all the games,

all the goals. horrendously go highlights. in 30 minutes of on d w. no one does coastal protection better than the dutch small wonder because large parts of the netherlands lie below sea level. the threat of flooding has long instilled, a spirit of innovation here, making the country a role model worldwide in combating rising ties. oh so 90 minutes on d w. ah with imagine that you're eating a hamburger and as you're biting into this juicy burger,

your dining companion says to you, actually that hamburger is not made from kaos. it's made from golden retrievers. should meet. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 in meeting cultures around the world, people learn to classify a small handful of animals is edible, and all the rest they classify as disgusting. a docu series about our complex relationship with animals. the great meat debate. this week on d w ah . this is d w. news, and these are all top stories u. s. president joe biden has told americans their banking system is safe as fears of another u. s. financial crisis rise. it follows the collapse of both silicon valley bank and.