wash, my idea is to start the prejudice our back will say to me as well, and that will be an uphill battle. but these women are ready to take on that fight you're up to days next. the up next on dw doc film is taking a look at how a i is learning to interpret human emotions. there's more d, w dot com, please do follow us to on social media or at dw. i'm jared rate in berlin. thanks for watching our flying rivers formed by hey waterfalls. perspiring trees or c evaporation during forest fires. and like them i don't get the answer and all of them okay. by invisible river that

flows through the sky starts march 23rd on d w. ah. hello, hello, hello. hello lou, i look a word i 1st impression and stress, shall i? we know i can trust her, but not him. she's lying. and so is he. but he seems reliable. and all the love of trustworthiness and perceive, and another person's face, even when they're complete strangers can predict criminal sentencing decisions, including up to capital punishment, and can predict hiring decisions. free flanks, if someone's face all the sound of their voice can affect our decisions. signal bottle, gathering information from facial and vocal cues, has been fundamental to social interactions. almost language has only been around

for tens of thousands of years ago, which in evolutionary terms and it is no more than a blink of the eye. although yield. first impressions can be alluring, but often deceptive. i'm looking forward to tomorrow. i'll face and voice reveal a lot about us out mood out disposition. i'll help a point to what's going on inside of the cues they give can even be interpreted by artificial intelligence. english. this is in science fiction from the owner of science fiction has been predicting this development for age is a government of it. it's still hard to fathom. and at least feelings skeptical and uneasy because we're not used to live on top of her for lou . ah, we encounter strange is every day and you face an unfamiliar voice with the unique

and distinct express our individual ality. but they also help us decide whether we like the person and whether we accept or reject their advances. ah, decisions we make instantly, ah, but just a 100 seconds of exposure, people already make up their mind about trustworthiness and competence and dominance, but they're making up their mind takes, you know, several hundreds of milliseconds, but you only need a very quick glance on their certain facial features, i'm even in a static photograph that convey ah, levels of intelligence, and that can lead to judgments and, and bias decisions. john freeman is looking at what happens in our brain after a short glance at someone's face. his theory. many of these instantaneous decisions are based on learned stereotypes. the same applies to

voices. escalade below continues to find evidence that we associate certain emotions and traits with hel, someone's voice sounds is she? there? we see voices as her type of auditory face. we need just one word to form an opinion has a voice like this in welcome see if i go, oh, is seen as inspiring and confident by most people, whereas this one also leaves the listener, thinking they wouldn't trust him with their money as a bustle. hello. hello. hello. hello, and what does science say? do? we'll see the same thing when we look at someone's face. john freeman uses the special morphing program to get a more accurate an son. and he can alter gender, age mood and character traits subtly. and if you asked

hundreds of different subjects to judge the trustworthiness of these individual faces, you'll find that they're generally agree in terms of being highly correlated with one another. so the same faces appear trustworthy or relatively untrustworthy. across the board. generally, although we're all different, the result is surprisingly similar for everyone. at least if i asked if someone is trustworthy for the 1st impression is when we decide who we want to communicate, cooperate, or former close relationship with proof. is it surprising that people, i have these kinds of unconscious tendencies despite humans being such rational creatures? i would say not really, right? when we think evolutionarily about it, in terms of our evolutionary past, you know, before we had verbal language, right? as non human primary. ah, nonverbal communication and ah,

using facial appearance using a choose of the phase voice embody we're really critical, right? for survival, for the maintenance of resources, for a building social group, it can be attributed to our evolution ah, making instant decisions about who his friend or foe greatly increased our chances of survival round them felt and being able to read the room is a huge advantage if someone in the group is scared, your own life may also be in danger to if someone is seething with rage, you paid them all run. ah, our brains are still wide the same way to day. as soon as we encounter someone new, we immediately attempt to establish whether they are with us or against us. 2 look what to what extent to these 1st impressions actually alter our behavior

a little. the evidence shows that they have a strong impact, sophomore in the butt to force it pulls up wizard. they predict all sorts of downstream social outcomes and real world consequences. and so, you know, when the findings like faces that appear more competent are more likely to be, are elected to senator and governor positions in the united states. and even presidential candidates are more likely to win in united states. comfort and looking managers and attractive people, a paid more, and defendants who look untrustworthy. i given longer sentences but what about our voices? we can here find nuances of confidence, dominance, and competence to even if they have little in common with the speakers. actual personality, the, with beyond words of voice,

also transports motions and can even bring things to life. pits become real because we relate to like other human beings. so you just keep it more. oh city. it illustrates how we instinctively relate to a human personality. if it has a voice, so upper to level only don't work on a puppet, for example. and because of changing body cues and changing void vocal cues, that the perception of the emotion, the perception of, ah, the person's or the, the puppets intentions are changed. oh yes, that mean the i said just a little bit generous t sympathetic. even in our brains create real people from the voices they hear. even when the people aren't real

sick, he shifted and once you give a machine a voice, it gets a personality as if it were human machine consists, anyway, it's an automatic reflex. as your auto magic, there was just, you cannot go, decal done in and research shows that people's feelings change if their computer, if your car or coffee machine has a voice in your who the company to said, well, the vocal acoustics we give machines, could even determine how we interact with them. it did tell me not to dilemma neil, don't as you want to has you have a clinician for her wake up wake up. how can i help you? what can you do? you can, for example, asked me to introduce myself or to chat a little. can you introduce yourself and the fur hat robot, a social robot built to interact with people in the same way you interact with each other. so i can smile and not gabriel's cancer is one of the creative dispersion process. top of the robot was launched in 2011. i looked

a bit more crude back then with cable sticking out from my head. they came up with the idea to cover the cables with a fur hat. and that ladies and gentlemen is where the name for hack comes from. i don't really need my for had anymore. i look pretty as i am. don't you think? i don't know what the original interest comes from really i think it's a very fascinating idea of creating and, and an agent that interacts like a human and behave like a human. it's fascinating by its own right. but it's also again back to the idea that if we can do that, we start to get the better understanding of how we as humans work in the future. gabriel's cancer want for her to behave like a human during a conversation. but as soon as scientists try to transfer our human behavior to machines, it quickly becomes apparent how complex or behaviors are. but i'm originally you

like being on today for that is supposed to make small talk. the robot search, just a way on its own for responses i what did you, what do you mean by that? you are quite stupid. free. ruth, is this a for? so i have no idea what the robot said next. so it's, it's, it's a surprise for me, what it says and it's, it's been fascinating to see how the conversation on post ah, although the conversation takes on expected turns. her head has already mastered the basics. when to speak with a conversation partner is looking at how much i contact is appropriate from the scientist to program. so with a whole range of emotional facial cues. however, the find a difference as we express using mimic and our voices are proving trickier. so as

humans, for example, we have this micro expressions, so my eyes move a little bit all the time. i make small movements with my face. and we want the robot to have those small movements, old. so otherwise it looks very robotic and not very human like. so we think that the face is extremely important and the way we give feedback to each other and everything is expressed through the face, but also through the voice and, and the way the tone of our voice and so on. that's why it's so difficult for fair to react appropriately. the same word or the same sentence can come across very differently depending on the mood, the occasion or the person we're talking to. unfortunately, there's no use the manual for humans that fur hat can learn from. yet anyway, there's plenty of cases where, you know, a face can be identical and the same features, but the context,

the body and the voice dramatically changes how we understand that person. there's all sorts of different kinds of cues. in terms of intonation, pitch contour, form, of characteristics that change how we perceive other people's voices, the emotions that they're feeling, their intentions. how do we read moods? mark shreds is researching how tiny movements in our facial muscles can influence our communication with. ready the eyebrows, cheeks lipsynching, all contribute to forming very different types of smiles with subtle because it has to do with micro expressions that you see around the i region or the mouth region. or you can fake a smile. like if i, if i do this in a fake manner, you can see that the person is pretending to be happy or being cynical or sarcastic,

but it's not revealing what, what, what his or her true sentiments or emotions are. and it's not only smiling, it's so also in the, in the very subtle movement of eyebrows, a very subtle movement of blinking a recent u. s. t. v shows focused on body language. the lightman is the protagonist of the crime show lie to me. he was an expert in micro expressions who believed facial expressions could expose lies and suppressed emotions gone. shame and shame, contempt. these expressions are universe can we really identify every single emotion just by practicing? some scientists think. so apparently, all we need to do is consciously notice each millisecond long facial expression.

the results are used in market research to find out which commercials are most effective. especially trained security teams at airports, also analyzed facial cues to spot potential terrorists you. it isn't really that easy to tell when criminals align you're spending in. hollywood wants us to think so. 43 muscles combined produce possibility of 10000 expressions, mac learn more. you know, polygraph how much that we spend on this damn project, but the scientific world takes a slightly dim. if you, in real life, it's often much harder to do. so for instance, our displays that from your micro expressions, you can see whether someone is lying or not. but that's close to impossible. so for most kinds of people lie about something. if you're close to chance level, about guessing whether or not someone is speaking the truth or not. ironically

speaking, if your life becomes more important, like if i'm lying about something which is which reading metrics like i have to hide something it's called the pink elephant effect. your cues to lie become more, become clear for the other person. so, the more you try your best, not to show that your line, the more likely it is that people will see that your lied. how easy is it to tell when someone is lying? mark's face is looking to children, aged 5 and over for the and so yeah. the children are asked to tell the prince in a computer game. it's the truth open from the actual but lie to the dragon. mouse in the door. this supposed to help the prince hide from the dragon, cameras and microphones, records the children's behavior in an attempt to find any differences it back

after recording numerous children. the results highlight signs the point to lying. how does it work? is a lot more. you don't do the slot when you look at the face. when they're being truthful, they are very open and they is kind of expression when they're being when they're lying and they have depression that they're being watched and being observed. you see that they have this sense of all i'm being observed and you can tell us from facial expressions around the mouth area, which is both more marked more mark kind of expression. then in the truthful condition. it's something about the voice. so when it being truthful, they have a very soft global, warm voice and a line that tend to be a little bit more using creepy for it's like talking a little bit like this. but not every child showed the same cues. so it's not

a reliable way to tell if they are telling the truth or not know that the generally were much better controlling our facial cues than our vocal cues. every sound we produce is created by over 100 muscles, all working closely together. the emotions alter muscular tension which impacts the tone of our voices. ah, ah, everything is controlled quite different parts of the brain. don't come to the muscles in the chest and abdomen that create the required air pressure muscles and the tongue lips and face that vary the voice. and of course, the learnings and vocal chords, the high, the pitch when we become excited,

for example, the faster they vibrate. does everyone hear the same thing when a stranger talks to will come to the same conclusion in deciding if someone is trustworthy, extroverted, or willing to try new things? you know, schuler is conducting research using a range of different voices. although the group doesn't agree on everything, data shows some clear tendencies. artificial intelligence is being used to help identify them from if my m as mine it, if use of us, my theory is that if a human can hear something was a computer can pick up on it to own guys to have to vote auto. but it becomes a little spooky in home when we got beyond what a human can spun. oscar cameras there mentioned one of us who, who and grunted to. so we're now trying to assess whether the speaker has cove at

19 or not racial hot class for yes or and minus for know what alleged meano's covered. no anthem 3 nora windows. some they're good. i've got one vote for positive one, the other. it was negative. you come to me is the next voice. it her eyes. this roy, it was on a month to live. we now have 3 positive. some one negative popped up. i'm going to say positive figure, pointed morrison. bruce. yes, that's right. diagnosing cove it by simply listening to someone's voice, sounds risky, at least when we rely on the human ear. at the start of the pandemic, we own schuler program to range voices into artificial intelligence is a more accurate diagnosis now possible. veronica smith, this is the a symptomatic, negative counters, negative grid underwritten . so ross is the symptomatic,

positive con b, one of us, one here to most little. so the oceans you'd sent is all by to renew his the hours complete cloud for we can see quite clearly on the right. the upper, tired out for washington, as host is in ms. ha her there are lots more signals we can use to the governing like the uncontrolled vibration of the vocal chords that leads to irregularities and the stimuli, and as of a certain throw to necessity. breathlessness is it of the cause as long as speech, braxton, you, one of the mythic, hayden and analog woman of play music, an unknown fuel tis at all. a kite chris or loft, tom, the signaling of his passport and sadness. once upon the thing, give the computer enough examples to reach a decision, a computer, and differentiate between asked man, or a call and entitled person candidate or to us ma, occurred on an upcoming dentist at least 85 percent of the diagnoses made by

artificial intelligence were correct, small computers could also identify a d, h, d, parkinson's, house pharmacy, and depression by analyzing voices. anything that goes wrong in the body or brain impacts voices. to make a diagnosis, official intelligence looks at up to 6000 different vocal cues. the new technology could allow diagnoses to be made more easily and early on. every word we say reveals more about us than we realize. and as listeners, we are influenced by the person speaking to us. subconsciously we relate the person speaking. we internalize their anxiety uncertainty, excitement, or happiness as if it were on the eb talk to synchronization,

connects to people through mimicry. in general, mimicry is something that we do a lot in normal kind of conversations. and it's reflected in various aspects of our communication from the words we use the syntax, we use the property, we produce the in the nation and the temple, but also the non pro, the communication francis smiling behavior close to the relationship or desire for relationship. the more intensive subconscious mimicry to come. we also mimic more strongly when we want to be like. mine is the clear signal. this my person figure something often does something of happiness in yourself. like if you, if you see a smiling person, you sometimes start to smile yourself. and so i don't know, maybe one of the attractive feature of the lease is exactly to do with that. like,

there's something you treating something attractive about looking at the painting because she elizabeth smiled. she elicits happiness. we allow ourselves to be influenced by someone else's mood marks. fitz wanted to take a closer look. in this experiment, the speaker is describing something to her audience. her manner is animated and she smiles frequently. oh, oh little place here. audience reacts similarly, they smile back not in agreement and give positive feedback. oh yeah, i least andy. but what happens when the same speaker repeats the process the more seriously. and her listeners also look more earnest. i appear to concentrate more, and the reactions are more constrained, synchronization signals,

empathy, an interest in the other person. how communication is successful, we tune into the more closely. and it's not just our facial choose that sink. it's our voices to try to express an emotion vocally that we're not feeling is nearly impossible. so what transforms a voice into an instrument that can appeal to persuade or motivate other people and with all of a needle has carried out numerous case studies and all have the same outcome. it's not what we say that counts. it's how we say it and stim, it's an old lovely voice is an extremely complex, multi layered signal. it only vs. evans will have information that we want to impart only to that absorbing it to hard work from

a cognitive point of view and strength. so we need to work on how we presented, as or emphasizing words can send a clear signal indicating which part the conversation or importance conduct need to consider short pauses to vices. this dish versus 150. in fact, are people who communicate like this are regarded as more likable. dylan is more visibly eog mod. oh, that's it. so it's all about how we use our voices to package the content that you know, one of the fun edition is performing a short test tracking of how well can his coworker present a text his reading from for the 1st time we're servers. as soon as the user is backing, artificial intelligence is again used for analysis of the computer calculates a score of 47.7. it splits the voice into 16 parameters, including speed, rhythm, melody, volume, and pauses. a score between one and

a 100 for acoustic appeal is then calculated out years prefer a varied pitch, usually around 2 octaves. charismatic speakers often switch between loud and quiet, fast and slow. the ad the loves it makes the voice sambal melodic and their standards of dimes. and the most of them on the century, this principle has been used by populists and demagogues to capture the attention of audiences. because even ancient civilizations understood that the only way to motivate and inspire people was to get them to listen. don't wanted to public speaking, projecting and modulating your voice to achieve the best result was taught in classic antiquity. now it's become of loss and skill. it is, and also the monkey sample builder as a dust muslim, there should be. it's possible to train your voice to transport information

effectively. also from of what shots blouse, no difference to learning. a new vocabulary go grandma dimmer ions whose edson landon pies off these green all of the neighbor has developed a computer training program after 5 seconds. so they know that you have a pitch range, that the principle is fairly basic, right? the upper and lower lines showed the pitch when you're circles and different colors and size represents speed, volume and pauses. ling to different. ah, yeah. what i really like to do is to try different food from different countries. and yeah, i really like spicy food also uses a showing what they can improve in real time in the golden time or meanings. in the extra after one day of training, the speaker tries again good chances to win. and patrick errors by 90 percent saving bond at schools 12 points higher than the previous day. how does your company handle the main improvements are in pitch variation clients?

the honda pulled his score has a sword from 34.5 to 73.3. that's almost double his previous attempt to stop along continents on this app has not only it's a clear improvement time card process for remote employee, other voices a so seductive that we can lose ourselves in them. a check i shown in this experiment with some drivers were given instructions by this voice, was eating that awesome fellow with idleness neither. and others by this slightly less engaging voice, closing this to us. and i was informed that meta vasey of a nice vlosky ist and thus after which the drivers didn't know was that half way through the experiment. the sat and i've started giving incorrect directions. i've shown facia on the got progressively worse and worse. i think the pope and we wanted to see at what point the drivers would quit, that's actually citing us by the us. we were able to show that the more expressive,

the more convincing voice kept drivers following the wrong route for longer as thought of the problem might have going against their better judge. luton advised them conflicts and when soon garcia i and we had to call them and explain it was just to test and ask them to come back, isn't fighting and vice longer folks and will not have your annual from western song, saudi quality to lucas by the one test and engaging voice plays a key role when it comes to flirting or meeting a romantic partner. hello. hello, i'm villa. vin. really willie will. i'm caught you now. doula. oh. so i'm looking for a woman for the long term. i'm who's attractive was 1st, who do we desire? every red us, we make snap judgements when it comes to one of life's most important decisions quickly and to rationally. it's ab judgements are, have always thought they're really fascinating. it's sort of how we determined who we want to date, who we want to be friends with. we don't want to be friends with. and we don't have

a lot of introspective access to those feelings. what drives that we usually encounter people and we like them or we don't like them and we have a good sense of that. we get along with them. and these things determine all of our behavior are we all born with the universal code is that nature nurture that allows us to interpret character traits and read emotions through facial and vocal cues. one thing is certain, we react to these cues from a very young age. are we are just like our animal ancestors. i think it will. obviously, primates never develop verbal language like humans. but just like us, they communicate vocally and they know how to interpret the signals with

just get sheila prepared, the shall fall, scuse such a design to sub. i always assumed that there were huge differences between verbal humans and nonverbal primate looking. but research shows that the auditory cortex and both species is more similar than expected, if it, whether verbal or non verbal. it makes no difference on how the brain processes signal skill login is su, gitmo level. lou escalon, his test achievements and primates using functional magnetic resonance imaging or f m r i the results showed that both groups react to their own species voice in the same parts of the brain. ready listen and we get our ancestors also probably use these areas. 20000000 jessica primates process. vocal cues the same way we did,

even without language it. oh, yes, no, she did do the brains architectural change slightly and humans to process language, and that's the coolest. picking it up, all miss it in, but the mechanisms have stayed the same in other species for anything beyond language, we can identity emotions. personality is latesha, vic in only multiple dismiss research into how primates interpret facial cues shows similar results. again, similar brain structures to humans are activated in the primates. does that mean that we are born with the ability to understand facial and vocal cues? was on yours is 10 months old and is getting ready for an experiment? ah, sorry, yes. and was to measure yours is brainwaves to see how he reacts to unfamiliar

faces. can he already judge who's trustworthy and untrustworthy? and then i was to do my family. we carried out research where we showed babies a range of faces for 50 milliseconds. that's only a 20th of a 2nd one. it's so quick. we assume that babies wouldn't even register the faces i to us since in however, we identified activity in the brain that prove the babies had not only registered the faces, but had even made the decision about whether they were trustworthy or not. but is it night or learned, ah, the video, nice stuff and all skin of anger ball. we don't believe that a baby is born with the ability to judge whether face is trustworthy or not. and then it's more likely to be a combination of learning processes and,

and inherent or early interest and pieces under one of the fluids. because i'm interested in going to over the 1st few months, faces and voices are a baby's most important learning resources. parents intuitively use pronounced facial cues, emphasize certain words and exaggerate this, capture the baby's attention and allows him to recognize emotions more easily knew why 6 months babies can already differentiate between happiness. fear, sadness, and anger. you want to play. i see. i'm still a bit sleepy, just like a child fur had his learning to understand us better and practicing how to behave in a conversation. he analyzes the movements and eyes if his conversation partner using a camera. my name is gabriel,

for it has to know whether i am talking to perhaps, or my colleague here. and so, and that's quite tricky. and we call that a multi part interaction. we are more than 2 people talking. and one of the ways of handling this is that we track the head post of the users. and so here we can see that the camera has detected as to here and can also recognize our faces. so if i turn around, look back, it will see that i am the same person still. ready it's time to play a game with fur hat gabriel. my attain takes turns, drawing a shape. while the other players guess what it is? could it be star? no. is it the flower? yeah, it's a power. got it. so my guess is further. now. make her as it were. i know peter say this. yes, this is a good one. 0,

you get her. is it about her hat will look and sound more like a human over time, but he won't be identical. study shay, we prefer a clear distinction between humans and robots. oh, we find it to creepy. the boundaries are already blurred in the media. after 40 years apa is back on stage. but in real life course, but as advertise it's light time is simply passed the group. it's 70 year olds by only their voices, a still real exposed. we're at the start of a huge technological shift towards this. your technology. we are often asked to record actors voices is that you don't use it as a cto, emer, i predict that over the next few years, these real life voice recordings will become superfluous socially to bump it. it'll

kick isn't it? because we'll be able to create a new synthetic weiss's using his scientific principles. would you love it? but this will be possible if i don't know what you're talking about, how do i know that you and frank were planning to disconnect me? and i'm afraid that something i cannot allow to happen, artificial intelligence making independent to see since we're still a pipe dream interact stanley kubrick's day. today we live with it may be that's a good thing because i, i doesn't make emotional decisions or to come to ensuring voices. it's neutral and impartial and everything. when not, bryan you program in a i, if they see that, you know, african american is linked with hostility and crime in media depictions and tv. and those are inputs into the i, the a i is going to pick up on that and act accordingly. you'll be shown

a series of if so i is more like off the move, realize that enlighten me were shown how some faces are automatically linked to stereotypes. but it goes up to we're testing for racial bias, the races. they're all races. yeah. 80 percent of people who take this test are biased. we're just looking for the guy and science dictates his subconscious bias directly impacts opposition cation time. for each of them, they leave a lot of collateral damage in the brain, right? it's not just a stereotype living in sort of a filing cabinet in the brain, right? they're changing, approach and avoidance tendencies, behavioral tendencies, motor tendencies, visual tendencies, auditory tendencies. john freeman is looking at exactly what happens using f. m r i . the test group is shown several different faces, as well as the part of the brain responsible for facial recognition. other areas that process, social and emotional information are also activated. these areas memorize bias and

personality traits to provide a rapid response, our brains make fos prediction. we register what we perceive to be most probable this can often be adaptive, right? if you walk into a restaurant, you expect to see chairs and tables and a waiter, et cetera. you're not gonna waste a lot of metabolic resources, the brain time visual systems, resources and processing every single object in that space. you would generate a bunch of hypotheses, you know what a restaurant is, and you kind of run with those hypotheses. and you don't, you use expectations to fill in the gaps of the brain is too lazy to figure out itself and doesn't want to re weigh some resources on so are we merely at the mercy of these mechanisms? john framing refuses to accept this theory. he's carrying out research to find out

how we learn the stereotypes and whether we can and learn them. he shows the test script range of faces linked to specific character traits. so given all that, we wanted to explore our capacity to rapidly acquire completely novel facial stereotypes out of thin air. people that have a ah, a wide cell in width, which is the nose bridge on the face. and it's a queue that really has nothing to do with anything interesting arm. it's just simply the how wide the bridge of the nose is. ah, so it's an arbitrary facial feature and 80 percent of the time we're pairing this wide celsion with trustworthy behaviors. so now they see completely new faces, not the ones that they had previously learned about, and that have wide and narrow saelens, that arbitrary facial feature. and indeed, what we found was that on a variety of different measures, more conscious,

less conscious that people are applying these stereotypes. they are automatically activating these stereotypes on, you know, without their conscious awareness, from just a couple minutes of learning. our brains, a highly flexible when it comes to stereotyping, we can learn to evaluate faces differently, at least over the short term. john is now looking into a training method that works long term. the same principle applies to voices. ultimately the more we know about these mechanisms, the less susceptible we are to being deceived by 1st impressions, a simple meals and push. first impressions. fascinating, sometimes deceptive, but always a special even magical moment and may be the start of a new relationship will be discovered. so much more than will be sore at 1st sight

. ah, ah ah, ah, a all quiet on the western front. their german anti war film wins no less than 4 oscars. we take a look at how art struggles to survive in hard times. ukrainian artists are fighting against the war in their country and for the preservation of their cultural identity. art 21. in 30 minutes on

d w. oh. she's up to date. don't miss our highlights. the d w program online. d, w dot com highlights you cream was like a stepping point 6, you know, pilots you into that would you want to be finish your studies. now you have a safety problem. crane. you can choose to go back or somewhere else. currently, more people than ever on the move mold might in such a better life. so why do i want to go back to 9 j, like i don't have any reason to let this know reason that's nothing for me that yeah, believe something great is coming very, very soon. and yeah, can we generally don't allow money story in for my grief reliable news from my going wherever they may be.

ah ah ah, ah, this is dw news live from berlin vladimir putin visits all keep hide. mario paul image was released by the kremlin, appear to show you the russian leda in the ukrainian city, which russian forces captured in may. now this comes off to an arrest warrant issued against.