because we decided, defacto that said could these are best where to cooperate, could crates, irreversible links and precisely avoid the also to be aggressive. they decided to weaponized energy. putting us in a completely crazy and unbelievable situation. found him, he can a wall just met cautious in the situation to discovers it. we have to reduce our dependency if you want to preserve european identity. otherwise, we will progressively be dependent on everything. and it's probably due to the facts. this is the sort of convergence with what i've heard. europe was, and especially as european union was too much driven by a customer approach and not sufficiently by, as a citizen and to produce or approach. and we didn't build sufficiently how to ensure our, i would say economic security and my intention,

what i want to advocate is not to in a certain way, reverts to protection, use them. and sony doesn't make sense. but to try to design with you and to define in a few minutes. what could be this comprehensive economic security doctrine for the european union to guide our europe connection globally. and i mean to protect ourselves our identity and to put ourselves in a situation to define our current and our future model for ourselves. and for mrs. noodle trin should be based on 5 pete off. the 1st one is very well known that i want to em insistent, that this is, i would say, as a nazi of one of our european union. this is competitiveness, an a stronger and a better european integration. this is

a 1st good on. this is very important because you can not be as hong, all the model. you can not promote your identity. you can not the fan on the long run, the european mother if you're not competitive and you don't put yourself in a situation to be 01 to produce the best in class solutions. this is why competitiveness is requested and this is why you have to buy the reforms referring to what happened at the beginning of our discussions. indeed, for instance, just an anecdote to illustrate. you can not live in a continent if you decide not to be competitive at the contra basis. and you just leave competitiveness to the orders. you kill your economy, but you put all continent in a situation not to be competitive. and in a certain way, not to produce any more in your place. how to produce aircrafts cars, but even soft were or any singles,

if you're not competitive. the customers you are, will refuse to buy at such a high price purchasing for us as the beat of re where you want to buy it as a fair price. if you want to buy it at the firm price and we'll use it in europe, you have to be competitive to do so. i. e, passing the reforms, being sure that you innovate. you have good labor loss, protecting your people in the rights. but creating sufficient flexibility to be competitive in an open world. this banners have to be found. france was normal balance. i have to be very honest. 5 years ago, 6 years ago, we decreased by more than 2 points. are unemployment rates. thanks. was a reform me, beth, and we are passing a reform for pension. i don't, i'm not sure everybody's completely or of that, but because air today, this as a form is quite complex, but we have sufficient regimes falls some categories which is on,

which is not justified for we have to stop with that because we are in depth than we have to run deficits largely beyond your current deficit in the zones. and i'm not sure that the taxpayer in there is an unwilling, except that we will finance a long run social model in france with europe. and thanks for your money. so as to do the job at home and i will pass from 62 to 64 when i compare it should be this angry with me because in your country it's much higher. and in another country in europe is much higher than 64 years old. so matter of fact that competitiveness and reforms being with this notion ard for the essential if we want to stay as the continent of producer. and if we want to have the ability to decide for ourselves, i eat to produce for ourselves. at the same time, we have now to insist on simplification and streamlining our regulation,

which is absolutely key for this agenda. and we have to do much more on education, higher education and training. because what is key for production is a very innovative word is to have tenants skills and to be sure that you train your people, being your native citizens. are people coming for migration to have the right skills for this current and want and this policy is absolutely critical if you want to be sovereign. and if you, you want to have this conference that economic security doctrine. but at the same times of his reform and the competitiveness agenda, you need more europe and more integration. we have to go further and much further. we asked to integrate our market. why? because this is the best way to have tom players. when you create a startup in one on our, of our countries, we have to deal with 27 regulations in

a lot of sectors. when you do it in china or in the u. s. because this is where the competition is a fake. your domestic market is much bigger the chance is a strength of europe is our single market and is how to be done, integrate the single market on digital on industry and so on. and how, as all to make it in common for discussions, sometimes can courses and is unique, may i think of our regulation in europe. but building a common approach. it's even more essential on the financing of for economy. and i want to, in systems at the financing of our economies, it will ease and will be more and more critical in an innovative words. because unit talents and capital. and to these, we are not properly equipped. we still have you are, we have a very good europe and regulation. we did a lot plus financial crisis,

but we are still very fragmented, and we don't have a proper capital marketing and, and we need it. why? because you have a lot of savings in a lot of rich countries, but the savings are not properly allocated. they have to go to very innovative as emmys and to poor or middle income gone for is in all europe. if she wants a savings to be located on the right risk and the right place is where you have the opportunities and returns. you need a capital market unions to be integrated. this is not the case with our savings are in very rich polices, but they don't circulate and they are not only indicators which is for all competitiveness and our futures. i think a weakness. so here is a 1st pillar of our economic doctrine, competitiveness and better europe in integration. this is a necessity in this economy and isn't burned where we are at stake. the southern

pillar is having induced killed pulses vernal dime. it was a taboo in europe because the 1st pillar was sufficient during the case. the 1st bill i mentioned was the alpha and omega of our economic bonuses. having in this group, policy was forbidden because it was an intervention on the market to decide some thing to interfere to create biases on, but we need it. why? because our competitors to day are interfering in the market. matter of fact. and because we have to accelerate the n, because we put ourselves in the situation to be too much dependent because of the, an balance between market and to begin to venture in europe.

let me express with, by taking one example. if you don't have in the school policy, you can not create progressively, you autonomy, art history, they're risking on energy. this is impossible. if you don't that, don't have a political and indifference, i would say, or in intervention of or in the school policy. you can nuts create your own that 0 industry. you can not crates all strengthen your own chips industry. because the also powers are interfering on sense and they have and in the skills policy. and you can not see, you can not busy on the lasting piece of these work with markets without in discuss policy view as, as one and strengthen in china has one. we need a european one. it doesn't mean to become of,

or darcy can this work. but it's how to be to have more autonomy or to better diversify your dependencies. to be sure that you are not tapped in a crazy situation. said there's something wrong with happen. so having different policies will, is, and will be critical in sevenfold. and i want to em. justin systems is $11.00 energy. during the bastere. we made it a wonderful collective job. we diversified our gas furniture. we were over dependent on russia. we diversified the swore market interventions. finding your producers on gas. but what we will have to do is to build a news highlighted g, where we will have progressively to reduce our dependencies and build more sovereignty on energy. which means that you can reconcile climates

and made that the degree, sovereignty and industry by creating your own energies, whole basically less consumption and more energy efficiency and innovation. europe, innovation, but more renewables on the european soil and more nuclear energy on the european slide. this is clearly an discount policy we are putting in place and we have to put in place because you have to puts subsidies at the fed or on a national level to increase and accelerate his policies. and you have to find the right incentives to do so. otherwise, everybody will be driven by short term incentives and not take into consideration something goes on price. you want them to take into consideration your independence, sovereignty and climate change. this isn't in the school policy where you have to

gather industry, climate and solving 2nd, all the energies that acknowledges and so on, you need for, i mean in order to deal with climate change will fix climate change with a lot of regulations. and i know that your country, sir, i mean, knows very well what can happen when you put people and you're progressively as them to make a chance for regulation when you have to do so. this is our agenda. this is what we decided for ourselves of europe landscape, but we can do it as well if we pud, use the solutions and on our on our side. and this is critical if we want to reconcile climate change industry and creating economic venue on our soil. and find the thing our social mother because there is not justice if there is no more production. if you don paul use money, you have no debate on how to share his money. and this is a big risk. if we rush for climate change, if we promote solutions,

we will buy and if we don't produce is solutions. and this is exactly what the think to the, in the current environment. this is why we need the indices policy in europe form that the or industry and this is exactly is document issued by it's european commission few days ago. to pa modes is snap the or industrial act, which is very important. this is how to accept some subsidies, some stated a current environmental occurrence, sorry, regulatory framework. but to be sure that we will pod use and attacks a maximum of innovations and new industries, helping us to deal with carbo, natalia. this is critical, otherwise we will lose our sovereignty and our ability to decide we will fit with the requirements. we will become on your toll for 2015, but with chinese or american technologies, which will put us at risk and,

and greater shoot download because it will kill jobs any that will create a situation where it will, it will not be in a situation to decide for ourselves it's obviously the same on defense where we need a common industry and we have to to streamline our organization and we need this approach and forms a chips act, boosting or indian producing much warns is critical field to the net, the or industry acts and so on this 2nd pillar of precisely and in this comp policy in our europe is absolutely key. as i don't want to be too long, i would say that it's exactly the same. we have to burn mind for all the pillars we're. we don't want to be too much dependent. we want to be open. we want allies, one good friends, one partners. but we always want to be in a situation to choose them. not to be one of the best person,

dependent on them and hit exactly the same on agriculture. we have to make a lot of changes to make our agricultural food model compatible with climate change . but if the result of our policy is to import more on more products coming from countries less restrictive than we are or less demanding than we are, this is a failure again. so we have, we, we do need an industrial policy for aga, our agriculture, precisely to produce here with our rules, but to help what uses to do more. and this is why we did advocate at the robin's k, a port in plan to be less dependent on podding and to produce more on our continent . so sir, did all of this 100 you according to me, is protection prediction of our interests. this is i would say the defensive side of this.