the the at the age of 74, most people have retired king charles the 3rd, he's at 74 and he's just getting started. assuming the throne is a moment that king charles has spent his entire life waiting for on saturday for the 1st time in 70 years, the u. k. well crowned a new monarch, king charles the 3rd and queen camilla will stand on the balcony of buckingham palace and wave to their subjects. many will shout long live the king. some may ponder. will charles be the united kingdom's last t. i brit golf and berlin. this is the day the i'm just so excited so i'm not going to give them the christmas break and hope in my present. so that's to say like i try so hard for you. i'm saying

i get why they're doing it. i disagree with it. i just think it seems a bit silly when we're we've got so many people struggling to have something so extravagant right now. on what else brings us together as a mission long live to point, we can also it coming up for most people around the world. the end came sometime last year for the world health organization. the. busy to the corona virus pandemic came today yesterday. the emergency caught me to match for the 15th time and recommended to me that i declare on and to the property called emergency of international consent. i have accepted that advice as it's dead flawed with great hope. but i declare to

call be 19 over as a globe on health emergency we do our viewers watching on tv as in the united states and to all of you around the world. welcome . we begin today just hours away now from a royal ritual. the u. k. has not seen in 70 years on saturday, inside westminster abbey in london. charles phillip arthur george windsor will be crowned king charles the 3rd, a 21st century coordination based on the choreography and covenant that have endured more than a 1000 years. king charles, along with his queen camilla, will tomorrow officially begin a reign into the unknown. the death of queen elizabeth of last year, after 70 years on the throne. the longest raid in british history is another queen . she became an icon of stability and continuity. but the people that charles leeds in 2023 are different in many ways compared to the subjects that elizabeth 1st read

it back in 1953, a majority of brits support having them on our but charles, he's not so popular. changing attitudes of demographics mean that the numbers wanting to mothball the monarchy are growing. we'll discuss that in just a moment. but 1st, a preview of tomorrow's regal of a. 6 the coming king last september, charles has been busy. his 1st visit to his head of state was to germany, where he became the 1st, which is mona, to address the point of this dog and germany's parliament. he impressed no niece because half his speech was in german. vig. it had to have been distributive take care of trout. who just starts is it into of charles himself has german ancestry. his father, prince philip, came from german nobility until his mother, queen elizabeth the 2nd,

also had german ancestors. but charles, his upbringing was very much british and irish to classic charles too, but the only he was born to be king. now he finally is his king to prove he's doing things his way. while acknowledging the traditional role he's inherited, i shall strive to follow the inspiring example. i have been set, not posting constitutional government. he's also trying to tackle some difficult issues. they include co operating with a study looking into the british, mona keys historic relationship with slavery. as well as king of the u. k. charles is also head of states of 14 commonwealth countries. some like jamaica

was sent as of the purchase slave trade. another relationship that remains complicated for the king is with his youngest son, harry the princes controversial autobiography published earlier this. yeah, don't human. it's just how dysfunctional his royal life had become. much of the book focuses on his magic childhood. do we get what seems like a happy marriage between his parents? ended in bishop a divorce. a year later, his mother, princess diana, was killed in a car crash. at that time, charles and the royal family would deeply unpopular. the public could not forgiving charles for having an effect with camilla parker bowles was still married to diana,

but by 2005, charles and camilla were officially husband and wife together they what todd, to repair that image. and we know that the public charles continued his charitable works and never gave up his environmental campaign, which he began long before it was popular. it is, i've tried to indicate quite some time in crisis really is a genuine emergency and tackling it is also the social royal price of coal makes it more difficult for him to now speak out of to decades of waiting to be king. charles knows his place and on the eve of the coordination of king charles the 3rd, i'm joined by 2 authorities on the house of windsor as well as the politics and people of the u. k. royal commentator richard fitzwilliam joins be from london and

murray leads. he's a political scientist enjoys me from paisley in scotland gentlemen to both of you. welcome. i'd like 1st to get from both of you, maybe your assessment on just how popular you think the monarchy is on this eve of this historic occasion. mister fitz, where are you, let me start with you as well. i would say that this has been a difficult period for the key and there is no question, but so has to preside with displace on secondary risk, particularly i would say sussex is having essentially gone broke. i mean, that was so much that was that stake in the relationship with the royal family and it's gone about the wrong. but having said that, you're looking at an institution that has ensured bob the direct number of criminals, protected in the civil war of the 2nd century for over a 1000 years. that being disrespectful sbc and oppose with the agent 24,

your group being a gauge, the monica and bernard. and i mean, if you look back in the 1990s, like mary sch, time over referred to your report for the amount of key as of 19 such as heavy under occasional, the 1918, the 60s queen victoria was same seclusion. after all that stuff bought the monkey offers. it's so important. continuity stability about policy politics not want to it has. uh huh. but one of the nice 2 of those come on registry for the on forces. okay, sure. a simple step is i've also the link for the truck um, but it has to get in terms of softball. okay. professionally, let me get your take on how, how popular do you think the monarchy is right now as well? i think it's like many things. it's been challenged, it's been challenged by certainly by newer generations and by the younger generations, at the same time it still has lost no. the majority of support behind it has

a plurality of support behind it is about 48 percent give or take that on a team. and there's also a significant number about 20 percent of the public that doesn't have a certain mind one way or the other. and at the end of the day, there's only about 2025 percent on a good date that would want to remove the monarchy and make the united kingdom or republic. so i think that insurance, mr. fitzwilliam talks about is indeed there. let me, i'm ask you to professor of what kind of united kingdom will king charles the 3rd begin rolling over tomorrow? well, you can begin really over one. it's very different, of course, as you pointed out earlier from the one that his mother was car 90 to be queen of we know of a country where the wells of a parliament, the scottish parliament. and not only that, of course, but we're talking about northern ireland, where is the largest party in the assembly ever were sensing wouldn't be one that

wants to seek independence. so in many ways we talk about the united kingdom, but it's one that has more diversion is more diverse and is certainly very different socially, politically, i'm culturally and i think that's what king charles is going to have to deal with over the next few years. mr. between, do you agree, i agree with that to me, would you say that the greatest risk to the king's reign will be changes and public opinion of the british tabloids or with the are the biggest risks inside his own family as well. i think the inside does have a family, sometimes this house is a concern, but as i say, there's been a lot of damage. they do have to decide on a room which is more constructive than just launching better attacks on them on the right. so wrong regarding how i big issues that are very significant such as the pollution i read the power mess and scottish national policies. it was probably

lost forever and mothers looking at some possible separation seriously in a referendum at some future point. i think i books whether that or something, you know, protests, i don't know. some of the concerned indeed should say 0 public policy and there's the largest and los po i saw showed overcharged for the republic because of the change in the demographics. they haven't been custody of catholics, but essentially i think that that is the issue. people talk customs here about change. the policy does reinvent itself. it has this habit, rather changing steps, kind of like data to rings a role abolishing prime projector. you've got your comments to share so that even if it for example, off to the $99.00 to see what the salt it's not happening they, they going to believe such a success. right? decay going to the dominant typically it's,

it really is quite extraordinary. there's a whole section of the house of minds up, a great number of british people that used to be i've been 10 years ago. there was a po, apparently the books, it's important and these around 70 percent, which was the way i think people saw um the uh they saw the queen as a beacon of the service. and also, i mean, ha, broadcast i that the news is coated big no longer a disease. well i, it's the queen, the way the crating sped. people brush quite takes problem, right. how does that response a professor at least let me just go to you for a 2nd and you are an expert on scotland. what are the chances that this united kingdom of will not be so united during the reign of the new king? i mean, what are the chances that scotland will decides to leave? well, it's already we have a referendum, as many people will know back in 2014 and vote whilst 55 percent voting to remain

in the u. k. was all up for so many people thought it would be. there has been a consistent support sentence for the scottish national party, who's a valid aim is independence for scotland. and they have gained a significant majority votes. almost one of every 2 votes cast of the last election and they continued to push for a new referendum on independence. and it was held in a i think the results would be very similar. but of course, there is a, a strong chance of increasing support for independence. but then there is term while there's always term modeling politics. there's always promos savvy, and just like the royal families, popularity rise, he's in wayne's sort of political parties. but there is certainly more of a chance of an independent scalding and it was way back when the queen was coordinated. nobody would have thought twice about that back in the 1950s. and nowadays it's something we think about on a regular basis. so it's certainly something that kind of car is moving forward

professor, you know, when you look at the, the demographic numbers that on younger people are not as supportive of the monarchy as the older generations are. how likely is that we could see a successful republican movement in the u. k. possibly the end of the monarch as well. i think i think that's probably a bit farther away than the possibility of independence conklin section like, but at the same time you're absolutely right. there is a significant age gap in terms of support for the monarchy. and the over 50 prize are much greater in sports than the under $25.00. so people start to choose change as we get older, and people do tend to become more conservative with the small cities. but at the same time, have these trends continue into the future. been and certainly in 2030 years, the model is going to adjust the to a very, very different reception in terms of the british public. and as we come to our

final minute or 2, mr. between let me ask you, what would the u. k. be without the monarchy? i mean the attention of the world tomorrow will be focused on the u. k. because of the crown. what were the u. k. b without, as i think the case would be much poor. i do think that the issue that you mention about tash and why you got $203.00 governments represented powerfully it's, it's quite extra the use of soft power that goes with the money keeps coming. well, i wrote the headship additional dollars or matching, but if you had some other way of being $56.00 sovereign nations, you would perhaps either drop by rotating, could have a dictatorship boy, you could have a beautiful graphic, wouldn't have the same cache. i think that society, i totally agree we are changing as people or if you're looking at the polls,

i'd say, you know, the most important. i would like to see more support, a model young and what have to see how charles and the royal family and most of them, of course have a 2nd to so the working models, that's a child side. we haven't mentioned that and i wouldn't mention princes trust is environmental work, which is so important. you're on a trip with natalie as the source and saying i would have thought would appeal to young people equal is the risk free. la rich as a is a set of romance to it and the pumpkin patrick treat doesn't be an evidence tomorrow. it does truly attached to the world. and of course you mentioned tabula newspaper. so yeah. i mean, it draws your attention of old press everywhere and yeah, could be all the way that it stays afloat as it adjusts in the coming decades to a different world. ms. richards, i've got the 22nd semester. i'll let you get this final question. we indicate on

the next generation how much faith do you have in them in keeping the monarchy alive. i take the time, they will see you why it is so good for a particular russian constitution. remembering that for public is a very tiny group and also, and freighters. notice political, major, political participants are left. your adult is something that has, you know, there was a centuries. and i think that this, that for a case study historical case. but also, if you don't like the case before you get rid of it, you'll have to choose 10 of your files that have taken over a century and i called the 2nd train, but no gentleman, unfortunately we're out of time at royal commentator richard is william and political scientist, mary, leads to both of you gentlemen. great discussion. thank you for your time on this friday night. fine, thank you. well,

we have been waiting for this good news for more than 3 years now. the world health organization today said that cobit 19 is no longer a global health emergency depend demik is over today the head of the w h. i have lived to the agencies highest alert level that has been in place for more than 3 years of this could mean an entity, international collaboration, but or the cooperative funding efforts. almost 800 people worldwide were infected or died from the virus independence. but it doesn't mean that the virus has gone away, nor that it has stopped killing people as the w h, as director general born today. however, that does not communicate with 19 these over as a global health threat. last week could be 19 claim live every 3 minutes. and that's just that as we know about this

virus is here to stay. it's tim kenny ended still changing the a research article published last week and the new england journal of medicine is drawing criticism for its endorsement of racial segregation among medical students in the united states. and the paper was authored by southern researchers, doctors and students at the university of california, san francisco. and they write, found it on legacies of colonialism and racism. medical education has historically centred white learners and continues to perpetuate structural racism, some black indigenous people of color. people have been socialized to care for the egos of white people to express their emotions only in ways that are palatable to white audiences. and to tread lightly around white fragility it a space without white people,

black indigenous people of color. they can bring their wholesale hill from racial trauma together and identify strategies for addressing structural racism. help us understand what this means for education medicine, perhaps broader society. i'm joined now by the author in bioethics. professor author kaplan is with in why use grossman school of medicine in new york city? press a cabinet. it's good to see you again. i just want to let you know in our audience now we reached out to the authors of this article and they declined our offer to come on the program tonight. we're glad you're here, professor caplin, i mean, what's your read on this research paper? so thanks for having me. great. i think you know, there's been a lot of bad about racism in american healthcare. and partly the system does have a legacy. and i know not everybody wants to hear about structural racism. but there

have been segregated hospitals in the us formally so up through the sixties and informally since then, we'd be hard to argue that racism is not impacted minority communities or the negative way. so to teach in the medical schools, we need to address the history and i think that should be addressed. also through the people, minorities tend to drop out for medical school, higher rates than others. so something maybe needed to be adjusted if you will. but as part of their education, to make them feel more disease or more respected or less anxious about what's going on in medical schools or certainly places, which until i couldn't remember. you know, when i was at the columbia medical schools entirely went mail. so there has been change, but i'm not sure everybody's comfortable. should we segregate medical education?

no, and that's not to to happen. is it ok to have groups that meet by res? like by? is this the that one to support one another? yes. let me ask you, the organization do no harm. they denounced this article and for advocating what they say is illegal discrimination. and it's also i'm condemned via the journal for it for publishing it. um, is this an article that you think is acceptable for the new england journal of medicine? or is it reflects a segment of opinion a mom so that all people of color minorities about their discomfort without medical education may or may not address, race may or may not address the history of racism. it has a place, does every minority personally agree? no. and you know, we do have efforts underway, we do advice,

food in why you to try and sensitize us to diversity, whether it's disability are ready. so whatever it might be, i think there is an issue. i think there's a real problem. i think the new england journal was brave to publish this particular piece because it's gonna still get up. yeah, in american culture, wars opposition. many medical students, we know who become with physicians, they take what's on is the modern hippocratic oath. in, in the reason i was just looking up to see, you know, what the modern version is, it says the health of my patient will be my 1st um, consideration. it says, my colleagues will be my sisters and brothers, and it says also i will not permit consideration such as age of race, ethnic origin or any other factor to intervene between my duty and my patient. i mean, if you take those and, and follow that i haven't, you maybe given yourself a guarantee that racism, at least in medical care, is not going to be

a problem in your practice. i say that's aspiration and that's great. but we also have to get down to the harsh realities for a lot of americans who don't have health insurance. still, overwhelmingly, poor menard, there were health care situations deserts. um, uh places where did you just people, native american, people with the system still has a ways to go. so yes, i do believe that treating every patient regardless of race, religion as necessary, as someone who merits the best care that somebody can give. that's an appropriate moral norm for healthcare, professional doctors, whatever. but do we need to do more? can we do more to support minorities as they try, if you will, to start to go into the system that has been historically run by the white majority? yes. and sometimes when they require an affinity, segregated curriculum,

no professor have, but we've got 30 seconds. i just want to get your take the w h o today declaring depend demik over a good thing. well, it probably is a good thing, but only if we realize that the virus is still there and remains a threat to us. we should not simply say that's over what's next. we have to say it's downgraded in our priorities. we have to be attentive. that's a dangerous virus still. professor arthur kaplan is always excellent analysis. good talking with you. we appreciate your time on this friday. thank you. for the day it is almost done, but the conversation that continues on line you're fine, is on to whether either dw news you can follow me on twitter at brent golf tv. and remember whatever happens between now and then tomorrow is another day, have a good weekend everybody. the,

it seems so simple, died many possible the english i was go, the oldest, the uti. i'm on our file. it could be different looking to get it, couldn't get by that. yes ma'am. oh dot com. we got that. so in guy too, but it had really need of what of course of transitioning from one to bio gas. how

do we make this accessible to everyone? india next on d, w, making the headlights and what's behind them. dw news africa, the show that faculty issues shaping the continents slowly getting back to normal here. well, and the streets to give you in the report on the inside, on the, on the ground reporting from across the continent for instance, from outside to you, a 60 minute dw, the one of the main kinds, oldest ambitions could be within reach. what is it

really is possible to reverse the researchers and scientists all over the world for a no race against time? they are peers and rivals with one daring goals to help smart nature, the more likes watching it. on youtube dw documentary, the i've been sitting here only for a few minutes, said i'm already coughing much russia. york has been doing this every.