[000:00:00;00] the when russia invited you trade last year, germany is that look on the world changed overnight return of war and you are if expose the folly of massive defense cuts following the end of the cold war. well, today the government government presented the country's 1st ever national security strategy, checking us if it strategic ambivalence. germany now has baked out a blueprint before defining its place. animal, hostile world, and program in by name. and this is the day the cheapest for rushes, aggressive action, show us that no country, not even germany, can be neutral when it comes to questions of warranties. right?

and wrong theory has done exceptionally well with what i used to call strategic ambivalence and says by the changes it remains the central task of the state to ensure the security of its citizens without compromise. jeremy then always sort of hedged its role based on what others were doing. that means security is not just a matter of a defense ministry and interior ministries, but it's also about how it is, for example, energy. because without security, the company, no freedom, no stability, and no prosperity. also coming up the a you moves closer to regulation, artificial intelligence, we can look at the benefits of the pitfalls of trying to control this technology is never good about the same algorithm can be used to those type of offer as well as to cancer detection. so it's all about what is the use case,

the eyes use for and who is using at the welcome to the day. now germany hasn't failed its 1st national security strategy. yes. in the making on the accelerated following brushes invasion of ukraine, it includes more money for the military. i'm fulfilling the previous commitments on defense spending made students nato allies, documents as flashed out and added structure to the historic turning point, the sites and vendor announced by chance by schultz last year in the aftermath of the russian invasion. it's also a strategy for preparing the german society for potential conflicts and making the country more resilient the day of his target 1st and central in general, schultz and 4 of his most important ministers facing the press together and on the table, the long wait, it's very 1st, national security strategy. it comes at a time when the global security environment is especially tens, with reference more on retrain and heightened to political,

to rivalry between china and the us. and say, side all the changes. it remains the central task of the state to ensure the security of its citizens without compromise. because without security, there can be no freedom, no stability, and no prosperity. and the space that means small and safety and the conventional sense security must be defined much more broadly at a german 4 in minnesota and the bulk july. the model is a lot of curity in the 21st century means that pharmacies can reliably supply essential medicine. security means that we can chat with our friends online without being spied on by china and without being manipulated by russian boards. when we scroll through social networks, sufficient, hi, begin the clarity. also sorry for each of us every morning when we take a shower. mrs. out with clean, hot water, knowing that its quality has been check lights dusting for the teeth. it might be the push to that, but there's also

a commitment to security in the more traditional sense. one very concrete example, the insurance that germany is striving to meet nato's 2 percent defense spending target. besides the spiteful segments, 2 percent is a long term goal. and attorneys is cleaned by 2 other decisions. we have made an asset to the finance in defense ministers from is that the german military can rely on this for the planning of the document also takes up the issue of china. the strategy paper refers to it as a competitor and says, tammy griver. at the same time, it acknowledges the agents, superpower remains a pop. now, without whom many global challenges and crises can not be resolved by didn't scar, we clearly see the world completely differently when it comes to the rule of law, human rights and democracy conflict on. but when we think of the finding the climate crisis, which is the greatest security threat in terms of sustainability, that we must define security in terms of our livelihoods there. we definitely have

common ground with china after decades and which external threats seemed far away in germany. profit it from a globalized economy, that has been a rude awakening. the country's 1st security strategy is a step towards addressing the realities of a new era. ok, let's take a closer look at basically the rough al bus home from the german institute of international and security affairs that welcome to the w. what does having a national security strategy now allow me to do that? it wasn't already doing well, that's a good question. i mean, they haven't, we've actually any really concrete resource commitments yet in this kind of strategy. it is a 1st and foremost, a dual credit exercise, trying to coordinate various ministries to different policies. but they have a common understanding under they actually talk more to each other. but one of the original ideas was to have a new also institutional structure and national security council. and that wasn't possible for

a whole number of reasons. so we really don't know yet actually what will be the sort of actual outcome of this kind of discussion so far. okay. we're talking about defense because obviously that's all about as a bib. secure say, but this is a strategy that goes beyond defense. but what we'll stop there, we'll start with a base commitment to spending 2 percent of gdp on defense. the same commitment that has been made and massage so many times before even got to the days of the former chancellor and going back up. so what should germany's allies take from this latest commitment to, to this, to present mock versus being there for so long? well, i mean basically it's just trying to say we're still believing and it's, and we have to show, hopefully in the years time that we're getting better at closing in on the target. and of course, the whole context now is different so that there was after the famous type and then

to speech more perspective to reaching that target. but we're still far off. so yes, as you rightly say, it's been a target has been around for a long time. i don't think the strategy makes it in itself a difference to reaching it, but it contributes to this kind of fence that yes, germany is a slow moving tanker, but it is moving. you talked about the very fact that there was this idea of a national security council which has been loss. uh, it's interesting because who then dr. is this who make sure the different departments control by different parts of this country's fractious, governing coalition, who make sure they don't chip away the bits they don't like or, or increase the bits that they think of being overload 12. this is exec, the why it took so long to get this strategy passed. i mean, this is actually already half of your late, at least and well, of course, in the end the power lies with the chancellor and the chancellor free. and in technical terms, there is a national security council in germany,

but it doesn't fulfill the function that say the west council does. because technically, at the moment it's only something doing with arms x force and very narrow mondays. i'm so a sweeping national security council that really has this power to coordinate to really set the direction that has been missing and it hasn't been instituted because the for an office and the trans they couldn't really agree on who has the final say so. so yes, that was really the challenge last the power, but there is still this kind of power play between policies and ministries and that's why we haven't gotten it. so it's already starting to sound like it could go off the rails quite quickly. i'm away from defense distresses you take some things like that. strengthening society to face challenges like cyber threats and climate change. how well, i mean, i think taking what i just said, also in a positive light. i mean, yes, of course the has the bureaucracy kind of in find thing to some extent, but on the other hand, they have come together on issues. and now there really is this kind of common

narrative that is security has to be sought as an integrated whole, but these different elements actually sort of influence each other and that we cannot continue in silos only. and, and so in that sense, yes, it's not good enough to only have a military strategy. i have a cyber security strategy. have somebody on, you know, is i'm a change, but we have to bring together anymore sustained, coherent approach. um, so as i said, i think it is the start of the journey. we don't have everything we wanted, but it can be a chance for something better in the future is, is this is i'm hearing a phrase from almost my childhood from 20 years ago. from tony blast, the british government took him out to him, joined up governments, which is what this very much the sounds like. china, where is china in all this? germany's most important export market. and of course, a rising ministry pout. while it is mentioned quite prominently on some, in the one hand, the strategy repeats the actually, or again, quite dated. so the phrase which is also use of the you level china as

a partner as a competitor and arrival. so trying to say, well, of course, in some issues, we still need to call breakfast china in particular on climate change out of the same time when economic competitor and increasing the unfortunately will also rival on various value issues and also potentially ultimately a ministry questions. um so, so this try as it is this idea that we can balance this, that we don't have to go into full out confrontation that we want to have also partnership. but as a tens relationship, and we are still a voice, your separate china strategy, which is coming in early july and the will be a summit in german china summit also. so there will be a lot of eyes on that and see how that actually kind of plays out. it's pretty clear. thank you so much for the outlining photo. so raphael, bustling from the german institute of international and security of your, of your empowerment, has approved the draft rules governing artificial intelligence problems. proposals

will now go to member states for negotiation and agreement. game is to set a global standard for technology used in everything from factories to self driving, cars and chat thoughts most agree that the rules are essential, is deficient over how strict they should be. whenever computers through jobs that previously required human intelligence, we speak of artificial intelligence, i crops up and many phones from the algorithms that decide what we see on social media to programs we use to generate text or images or software that helps doctors to spot cancer and x rays, but it can also be used to supercharge this information online, or enables surveillance on an unprecedented level. so let me the countries are looking to regulate artificial intelligence. europe is leading the way. there are fundamentally 2 sides to the debate. many i, our developers are concerned about having too much regulation. we need to make sure that'd be don't override your life right now because that will hinder innovation.

it's awesome is was that helps found the german, hey i association which represents some 400 companies is never good about the same algorithm can be used to this type of offer as well as do cancer detection. so it's all about what does the use case? the eyes use for and who is using a lot of the innovation comes from small startups. and so the more regulation we put, the less the innovation of and see from the small companies. but while the opportunities of a i a vast. so with the risks, and that's the other side of the debate. digital rights advocates want to talk rules to mitigate the risks. is artificial intelligence, machine learning, and all these. let's a complex complex algorithms and data sets. are jeff placate the biases? that's the humans have a systems used in recruitment, for example, have been shown to be biased against women. facial recognition technology has been

proven to be less accurate for people of color with people being arrested for crimes. they never committed, and algorithms used to by public authorities have wrongly accused thousands of families of welfare fraud. so, you know, make, is a thinking to balance both sides of the argument. their answer regulate a systems according to their level of risk when the risk so limited, like when a high is used to fill the emails for spam, only a few rules apply, but for potentially life changing applications, like deciding which students qualify for higher education, the rules will be strict to some applications will be banned completely. the aim is to reap the benefits of a i while limiting its risks. but it's looking at a specific cost me the mother who's presidents and co founder of ally, that's a group working full responsible i. he's also a member of your opinion commissions that height is f o x,

but group on artificial intelligence. welcome to dw. so we're still a long way, i think from this actually becoming legislation, but looking at where we on the how is the, how would these proposals likely to work as well to start with your 1st remark. we're still in a way, we're not that long a way from assign old and a final text if we believe the cobra because of the european parliament. and today they mentioned that they want to have a final text by the end of this year in november. then there of course will be increased period, but they also mentioned that the grace period will likely be to use, but they also mentioned that for certain applications and certain systems degree experience might even be shorter than that because of the latest developments. okay, that's interesting is that because the i has exploded, this technology has exploded over the last,

let's say 1st last 6 months so. so he's got speed and speeding speed you 2 months from now, the landscape is going to look completely different. sorry, 2 years from now in. yeah, probably the landscape is gonna be uh, is gonna do different. what we see with the latest developments, like you mentioned that for example, chad should be t and major ne, i'm to generative ai systems. is that the challenge is that they bring are not that different from the challenges that we have seen over the past couple of years. they are larger in scale, but they're not that different. they have the same challenges regarding bias that have the same challenges and risk regarding the impact on fundamental rights misinformation this information of scale, safety, etc. so we,

there might be different and systems coming up in the coming years. the challenges might not be that different. and on the other hand, if the, if the challenges are really different, then the a i act will have mechanism. some place to uh, quickly is that the rules to those changes and to those developments. so it's a quite flexible reputation. it is, it is future prove if you will, right, is what kind of need pendleton to go to need fairly heavy penalties. because when you look at what these, these systems can do. now when you look at the misinformation that date sites, right? the sort of people who will do this in the 1st place. i'm not going to be the sort of people who will say, oh, well they, you know, it has a lower against this, so i'm going to stop. so it needs enforcements and needs punishment that needs property. yes, and there is, there is quite some teeth in it. um,

there are quite a hefty fines in the uh, in the dropped a i x they, they range from. i think 10000000 to 40000000 for a breach of the a i act and the so there's a, there are quite some teeth already in the x and, and there will be a structure of supervisors that will be mobilized to, to see if the, if the act is live done by organizations and there's also if the parliament gets this way, there's also an interesting new of possibilities for, for people, for citizens to go to a supervisor with a complaint to issue a complaint with the supervisors. sort of the whistle blowing. if you will, to say, look, there is in the system and play and i think that it is not doing really well. could you have a look at that? right. it's interesting that from what you've said, and i appreciate the visual be,

legislation has hundreds of pages. it's not thousands of pages long, but this is aimed at corporate structures. but if you are a bad actor, if you are acting on behalf of a malign state, what's good is being find because you're not going to pay that disease, is this the will be as low as carry jail time. and they won't carry to time. no. so it's a, we have every laser smile, but i'm thinking that, you know, if i'm running a, i don't know, i a russian troll factory, that's money, but it's manufacturing. jo biden's going active saying all sorts of horrible things you saying, well, we will find you millions if we can catch you. that's not going to stop me. you know, but we always have to do, right? because people were not willing to abide by legislation. definitely have, for this rule, there is a, there's no going to be,

there's not going to be jail time in this little. but it might be in the future that we will move towards a structure that would include also jill time. we will have to see, but this little does nothing to that yet. thank you for to have so that's the catalina mueller of president of ally. thank you. you're welcome. to he's presidents as nato should know, best on him approving swedish membership of the ministry alliance before july's nato summit. the jeep type of the ones that these countries attitude to sweden's accession was not positive. squeezen hasn't yet fully addressed to secure the consent to accuse this waiting, the thing to leanings towards the militant cottage groups was. comments comes officials from nato, sweden, finland an anchor man in correct to address to his consent. the secretary general

against ultimate excess. some progress has been made. so for instance, this week the new announcements over the next edition of the person elected to the p k. k. again, this is good for the fight against terrorism, but also good for sweetness efforts to find the organized crime is read because these groups i want video links to the same people, collecting, organized crime in, in, in sweden, that are responsible for the types of options in the in the, in seen in judy as a non resident senior fellow at the foundation for the defense of democracies and an expert on turkish domestic politics and foreign policy. a welcome to d, w. before the recent tax presidential election, people were 2nd president owed one was blocking swedish entry to a native to boost easy election prospects while he won. so what do you think the hold up still is? so that's what a lot of people are wondering right now. this government is making notes the secret

by saying that the swedish government is not helping itself by producing more p k k process to afford and being continuing to be represent on extra dieting. a number of individuals that are supposedly, or allegedly affiliated with the p k k. but it also coincides with the p k. k itself, unilaterally declaring that it will be ending in cease fire, which is temporarily put in place during the course of february. so there's a whole confidence of things going on, but at this point i don't expect at least up until the summit of alternate. so coming out, so to get to ratify. so perhaps i would want to explain it to once again, playing a game that uh wants to keep everybody guessing what it does. it's starting to look like in order to move this forward, this is going to be on sweden to decide how much it's willing to compromise itself morally, in order to achieve this nature membership. or that's exactly it. so look,

you know, sweden has brought protection for association on individual freedoms, so long as the north islands and turkeys basically said that's not good enough, but we, we want you to take action. it said to stop these little p k. k sort of process going on with slacks lying around them, some projects down to the sweet spot of the building. we also want you to expedite people back to, to keep the basic me without any to process. if we are to say yes, that's essentially the position that's working that line. and it's also the position that basically size, despite the amount of pressure being put on. i have to run by nato officials as well as united states to ratify. so we, there is not as heard any rush that he's kind of comfortable just waiting was how um, you know, there is a side of me which things that he may have enjoy this out even further beyond the, beyond the, somebody if he doesn't approve it, basically until the local sections of, of, of may 2024 because i don't want to is interested in winning these local actions. took his big cities like a stumble, anchor, etc,

from the opposition hands. and he's not going to be able to do that by essentially was selling an economic message that voters will buy into simply because, you know, took these interest rates are about to go up. i know 30 minutes is about to come in . so either one could continue to use this sort of ronnie around the 5 message if he wants to try for support, but we'll have to see. so this is, i appreciate what speculation, but this could be the one thing he can still hold onto just a little look, this is me defending turkeys in stress. so if you look at the other side of that equation, then and look at the sweet and it could it be, but sweden then doesn't join nato, but instead just science, a series of a bilateral mutual defense agreements. so i think that's a scenario to sweden, which is the void and understand to be so i mean look, you know, it is on the stand to be worried and you know, does not want to be on the these, this cost has or the gluten government bearing down upon it, particularly because it is, you know, it all basic barriers for succession to nato has been sort of pushed past with the

exception of circle check. we have sense to its membership. so it's, it is, it is a fixation. it is a focus of sweden's attention. it was not want to settle for that. and also there will be a considerable amount of pressure to be uh, diplomatic pressure being private searcy binds united states and other western government, but also turkey, which is to acquire new fine to planes from the united states. and part of the condition, even though it's not on a personal condition, will be that without it took excepting sweeties and sweetest membership and they won't get those have to explain just from the from america. so there's a lot riding on this. but look at along, you know, by denying swedish membership, this really plays well with her, these domestic a position as well as terms who live in europe. you know, terms basically look at, i don't want to say look, well, you know, he defends our on our, all the integrity and the, and the, the image authority visa view west and sort of in positions. and they kind of like that. so he doesn't really and i sort of have that much to lose in short time, but he would like to get his hands on some of these new defense acquisitions as

soon as possible. that's very clear. thank you for outlining that for assessing and judy of the foundation for the defense of democracies. thank you. the next time the quick line of football proceed. dormant has confirmed the deposit of stein mid field that jude bothering him. after months of speculation about his future, he'll join spanish jobs around the trip. belling them quickly became of fun favorites endorsement. after arriving in 2020 from his boyhood club bmw city after natalie missing out on the bundles, vega title on the last day of his 3rd and final season. and jeremy bellingham is now headed to madrid for an initial fee of around a $103.00 medium euros, rising to potential $130000000.00, subject to performance based bonuses being things and international still just 19 years of age were old and their own business the day is almost done,

the conversation can continue online. what on that social media at cdw you have a good day. the is germany becoming irrelevant. doing business in the country has become more and more unattractive. due to cumbersome, huron, and high taxes,

inflated energy costs and labor shortages are only making things worse. germany and beacon nomic powerhouse no more, are made in german or enter the conflicts own with sarah kelly. after months of speculation, the log in since a paid in new cranium counter offensive appears to be under way. my guess this week on complex own is ukrainian deputy prime minister all her stuff and need to know who overseas ukraine integration into the un nato. what more does she need from partners to future proofs? ukraine's defense conflict zone. 60 minutes on d, w. the one of the main kinds,

oldest ambitions could be within reach. what do you see? it really is possible to reverse the researchers and scientists all over the world for you know, race against time. they are peers and rivals with one daring goals to help smart nature. the more likes watching it. on youtube dw documentary, the global challenges are forcing economies to vote quickly while increasingly leaving