and you can get lots more news on our website that's still new. dot com. the british moment, 5 minutes, the bodies johnson resigned from parliament last week. and on to the patient dining report into his conduct during the cove had locked down the report from the possible house of commons privileges committee was released today, and they didn't pull the punches. despite having a majority of conservative em pays, a community found that they can serve as a full my premier, had lied to parliament about pauses, a 10 downing street jordan coby locked down and tried to intimidate those, investigating him from prime minister at less than a year ago to back branch and pay to persona non grata empowerment, or his jobs is full is now complete. for now at least, i'm feel gaily, brother, and this is the day. the

1st johnson is not on their law breakable the lion is not fit to public office and this disgrace himself up to starting the item or to normalize and to begin with. and now i just feel like you just started sometime again, how much was the food? here's boris johnson. 9. he lied to em piece he lodge for people in this country. it's quite clear that he misled polymers. this is a mad to use a serial, like i said, the history of his design is josh epic, i think was not for today and i haven't read the evidence is whether or not he knowingly misled problem. welcome to the day they fall from grace of a former bridge, primary, subarus, johnson god, it's official sale. today with a diamond report for the powerful parliamentary committee, the house of commons privileges committee found that mister johnson deliberately

and repeatedly misled parliament. that's a polite way of say, slide the verdict to take say i make so the 1st british prime minister, i found to applied to parliament elements and taken mr. johnson to task over a series of parties. he attended during the code of had lockdown masses or before said of the greatest importance to the house and to the public and about which he'd like to deliberately and repeatedly. mister joseph's allies have criticized the reports as vindictive and they'll get bad chance to oppose it by them. piece vote on it next monday. the other. so the fault lies with none other than alexander far as the faithful johnson. the truth is he is donkey's own home, and this is the result of his own actions. and i'm afraid it's entirely of a piece of the way he's behaved over long periods of this is a man who is a serial lie a right to the history of his line is just epic. and so, i'm afraid will he did it for dispatch folks in the house of commons when he was

offering questions is full of the peace with his normal privileges. commit is pretty down to you though it serious 1st, johnson is not only a law breakable it. elia, he's not fit for public office, and he's disgraced himself and continues to apply to, you know, pounds, shop trump in the way in which he tries to describe it. and he bought a few criticizes these actions with actually a decent public 7 would have done the on the both thing. what about the little bit of the military? i'm going to apologize to the british public for what they put them 1st. tim gibbons is a journalist who was in brussels when mr. johnson was also there coffee and actually his career as a youth bashing journalist for one of britain's most, you're a skeptic, natural years paper. so welcome to the w. let's start with the idea of what has happened today. the british parliament still has to vote on the committees of findings. mister johnson's conservatives still have a 60 feet working majority. so are they likely to vote to save them by?

you know, i don't think they will, and i always think they realize that the they go to a dead man basically in place. they can't do anything to save them. he's finished. i hope so. certainly from his record in brussels when he was there as a, as a journalist and, and as a politician, he was never really very effective. i have to say the committee had a conservative majority and, and in large part of britain's routing, conservative government, oh, is it some apollo mentoring majority to bodies, johnson? so why, if i turn that box on him, the 10 the backs on him because he's been shown to be less that entire truthful. so we say, i mean, years ago, i was walking across the tassel in brussel. as soon as a set price to, to your being parliament buildings. and i was actually going to do any do for the develop lit up on the other side of the house of the all there was a was waiting for the bbc who was his sister in law and morris jones. he was in the

middle to do an interview because the bbc camera rolling, laura's don't support golf turned said, oh, interrupted the date and the interview broke it up in fact and said, beautiful day is a did. and she she, she stopped to do the interview. will come across the window and came back and said, i just have to check if it's true bars because you'll, such as i uh, okay. so let's say you've obviously then seen them on, on to his methods at work during your shared time. there as a generalist at the a, you've had courses and so it sounds like you don't find it at all surprising that he's been declared a life. i know, and i said to me, he always has the everyone knew he was the, they all said was that they were people, there was so comes of a day then i mean right wing conservative that they were quite prepared to build up with these bits of peccadilloes that is all to tease. it wasn't always that i'm

kind of mad i, i'm the one time when i was mainly freelancing for local, regional television in the u. k. and i had a problem with the young man who turned up and started asking me what the stories were in the morning. when i told him i found out later that his phone might client stations and off with a couple of them for less money than i could borrow, as johnson suggested, it'll pop next to the commission. but it started off as a he was for my tv and tell the man to go to go to moscow and we had sold here when he got there. i couldn't even do that. i mean, oh, right. i didn't like the chapel was doing, but i couldn't have left him stranded in moscow. but both so that will be the various jape. okay, so he's resigned. he resigned last week. um uh, based reports into his misleading of parliament was published this morning on his gun. does any of it's really matter. i don't, i don't know. it's very hard to tell at this point. he certainly had

a very negative effect on government and on, on parliament i think to and the candles and certainly all the conservative body because there are now lots of people who did vote for him cuz there's a big, tough about a business to sort of trump type of support, you know, he's is the tough guy in charge. but they realize that he's, he's really got a fee to play ease, ease, eats. he's not really all the he said he wouldn't be easy zaliah in their thoughts . the truth. he always tries to make himself come out looking good. and the fact is that he's made a complaint against one of the conservative and peas for the same reason that the chap said that he was complaining of that bar assaults and attending these bodies. but he was the 2, which means that he wasn't denied that he's organized the policy, but merely that one of the men who attended it was complaining about him. right, so a couple of his supporters how have now uh, also designed for parliament at triggering by elections and causing headaches for

a potty. but mr. johnson as press professed to love. so all we now go should say, weeks of, of this conservative government telling itself apart, while britain just one does, will bridge people just one that will how we're going to power electricity bills that we're going to deal with this cost of living crisis. or i think it could be weeks, i hope it wouldn't be that the johnson himself wouldn't care about that. he's only interested in presenting himself really, he's not interested in the of the effect that his resignation might have or, or re boat has any. he's still saying the very long ago that he would stand again and re smoke with a man that he's just given a night to do this thing a. he'll be back on day and i'll be back in to hundreds of on do i just can't see that happening. i don't see how a man can goes sofa back down the road and still come back to the leadership. i

just don't possible, surely. control here. thank you so much for joining us. i do understand, jim, give it my pleasure. thank you. the new york times is reporting that the bible administration is close to reaching an informal deal with terry rock to limit iran's nuclear program . and this comes as a result of, i'm going to accept following the breakdown of attempts to restart the 2015 iran nuclear deal, which so to run agree to limits its a nuclear program in return for relief from international sanctions. united states walked away from that deal during the trump presidency. with these lights, these 2 oaks i said to include the us around an israel, the paper quote, utilities, right? the officials are saying that there was a minute drive the prime minister benjamin netanyahu. i was constantly wanting to the thread post by around noon today and program here is speaking, introduce them this week, following discussions with us secretary of state and to me banking facility that

gosh, i emphasized our consistent positions because a lot of times and you could have agreement with iran will not stop here brand new to the program will just allow it around to direct money, even large amounts of money to the terrorist organizations that operates under at sponsorship in the middle east. and the round these rails bawled as i emphasize that no agreement with iran would find these rail ways all without an agreement. we will continue to do everything necessary to protect the state of israel and see if we can get into this with a wall street journal. correspondence of lawrence norman, who covers the around nuclear issue, welcome to the w. and what do we know about these talks between the us, iraq and israel? yeah, so that will she general reports around stay um 1st yesterday and that to have that been discussions we should be a little careful as well as not part of these discussions. the writing is been sort

of the varieties and these riley's daniels be a writings the discussions of really being between the us and a rod and they'd be mediated mainly by a mon um and they have being a balance away to close tensions between the us and the ron and there are whole, but for those tensions from a folksy running grades, attacking american citizens in the american soldiers in the middle east, 2 wrongs new program until around supports for russia in the war against ukraine. so the idea here is to get to a point with some of these tensions a cold and, and diplomacy can be dialed up, right? so it does this way that the 2015 deal is now just dead an, an unfinished. and now this is, this was a temporary fix. so uh, yeah,

this would very much be a temporary, not just a temporary fix, but a small fix onto the agreement. uh, if this comes together the, the, the favorite praise of myself is, is, is that the new fit deal is kinda tight. it's not quite dead. then there is a prospect in the future that it could be pros, bank, but we'll be talking about. yeah, essentially is the us providing money to the iranians that is compelling the docs off on the us sanctions and in exchange around taking some de escalate respect that would include not attacking americans in the middle east. it would also include wine by a very additional days, then you for you active it to the new to the work that iran has been doing as of the cuz last couple of years. and he buys the situation. i'm not in a short time over the summer. that's what they're trying to do is that succeeds. there's a little bit of

a window of opportunity. bolton that out and maybe to even see if they can restore rescue the new kid. do the testing 1st. it needs to be a, along the escalation that has all these tools they've been aimed doing. all right, let's just have a closer look at a couple of those reported concessions, for instance, around to enrich uranium to 60 percent, instead of 90 percent. explain to us how that differs from the 2015 deal on why it matches. stella identity i didn't do is do a drawings on the new york times reports, and i will draw a monitor of both thing on this. and well, the deal, as we understand it actually says, is the wrong would not be able to increase it. so file a 60 percent, which is funny and right, you're right in the wrong. and the only country in the world does not have nuclear weapons. that is producing 60 percent funding and retraining. this do would say

income producing it, but if you do, you have to turn it into a week of full. you can't increase your so called a 60 percent. how does that differ from the j b o? i don't massively the j p o, i put a limit. the 3 i said the wrong can only produce 300 kilograms all rearranged. you've reached 3.67 percent, very low rate. very often what things great. iran is now 60 percent us officials and said he would take them 12 days to take this to file the, the, the, the amount of enrich arriving. they produce a 114 kilograms and turn it into weapons grade material. and then now we do need their weapons, it would take them 12 days. they need to deal with a long way away, having no pics home to, to meet the appeal. but if it wasn't right now that very close to

a matter of things, that's not always come, thoughts, it's safe, going to do where it is and know what to send you some, begin to build this gland to see and, and, and hopefully spend some time either this is a pensions and less than it is correct. another element to is this, this idea of it a run doesn't provide ballistic missiles to russia, which i guess means that the bad, bad to problems now infamous a kamikaze drones will still be going yeah, yeah. i hate somebody that point to i hate somebody just went too much, but the again, i know it was easier. jennifer, both the we were both of the story fast and and my details are little bit different than that. well, what is being said to us is that it clearly reduces the political space

that any kind of dealing with a wrong, as long as iran is helping russia. and it's, it's a war of aggression against ukraine. so the more that they do, the more difficult it becomes in congress to, to work with the iranians to have size, productive dependency width of with a wrong. now what i've been told is i didn't know the right it linked to these efforts to get folks going above the rent is being told, the nonsense ends. you're making the wrong choice by supposing russia you're making the wrong choice by sending drains. if you make it even once, as one wise would be to send ballistic missiles, then it will make it impossible for us particularly to deal with you. so please don't do that, sir janet to find new ones aside. the princes know the condition, but everyone beer pins in the magazines has made it clear to be

a writings. the support for russia might fall, florida. they have productive dependency with the wrong good talking to the thank you so much for joining us. large moment from the bull street. joe, thank you. so that's a pleasure. thank you. are you a secretary of sides of the bank and it's heading to beijing this weekend. if is it comes as tensions between the u. s. in china continued to increase over various issues, including taiwan. secretary banking postponed a trip to beijing in february, after the us shut down the chinese spine. but there's no fee american coast us officials playing down and talk if any major breakthroughs during this visit. i say it's an attempt to reopen the diplomatic channels of what they call a crucial time and relations. china will continue to be around and a major player on the world stage as we are putting ourselves on that stronger

footing to compete, that they have and will continue to take provocative steps. we understand that and you've heard the president say it's important to have that diplomacy with world leaders. it's important to have that discussion. so we believe intense competition requires intense diplomacy and that's what you're seeing from the state department . let's get into this with david sacks as a research fellow at the council on foreign relations where he focuses on us china relations. welcome to dw, as 5 years since the us secretary of state visited china during which time relations between the 2 countries have deteriorated, was on to me blinking hope to achieve as well. i think the by the administration has tried. it's best to play down expectations of a senior diplomat for asian at the state department yesterday noted that there wouldn't be a long list of deliverables and really did try to downplay expectations. so i don't think we're going to really see much of the actual steps forwarding us china

relations the by the end of ministration is really focused more on establishing guard rails, for the relationship of voiding. an incident between our militaries that are operating in very close proximity, what they would refer to as a floor and the relationship. and even though they've pushed this really throughout the administration, trying to hasn't uh, taking the bait so to speak. china doesn't want to talk about competition or establishing guard rails or open lines of communication. so to this point, both sides have really been talking, ask one another, and i, i doubt we're going to get on the same page and this visit slide. so the, the fact that the, the visit is gathering, i had a tool under those circumstances, sounds like a bit of a wind or i think so. i mean, i think that the visit is a good say, you know, i read this as the latest in a series of incremental steps by both sides to see whether there might be the potential for a floor or some rolls of the road for this relationship which is getting quite

tense. we had the us national security advisor j. j sold and meet in vienna with china senior most of them at the us secretary of commerce and trade representative hostage their chinese counterpart in washington. a few weeks ago, a secretary of treasury, janet jaelyn said this week that the coupling would be a disaster. so i think we see a series of quite deliberate steps by both sides to try to see whether there can be some rebuilding of trust. i still think that we haven't seen the floor of us china relations yet, and it will probably get worse before it continues to get better. but i think that's what the secretary blinking is trying to seek out engaging. ok, so lots of issues between the 2 countries. one of the most significant of cost of being taiwan and regarding the taiwan you wrote today and found a fast dot com about the sources of instability, a growing in one of the world's most dangerous hotspots. diplomacy is frank

detachment exhibiting on china's risk. tolerance is increasing. just explain to us what you mean by that phrase. china is increasing a risk tolerance and contrast that if you would with the wife has this kind of stance on taiwan. so well, i think that we see this on a daily basis, you know, for the last 3 years or so, china has normalized military activity in taiwan air defense identification zone on any given day. it is more likely than not the china is military ascending aircraft through taiwan air defense identification. so after speaker hello, see visit in taiwan, china or race, the median line or center line and the taiwan strait which had held up for decades and helps the conflict. the 2 militaries and now we see china ascending military vessels just outside of taiwan. it's 24, not equal mile continuous. so. so we see a continued encroachment from china near taiwan. we see some threats in chinese

media and elsewhere, but it might choose to send aircraft over the island itself or violate its territorial waters. so i see a very deliberate playbook from china is attempting to alter the military balance as well as the military status quote and the taiwan screen. so china a, ping the temperature while the wife has just want as well. again, i think that the white house is just trying to avoid an incident and the end is really focusing on risk reduction mechanisms. and so i think china is actually sees an asymmetry here in risk tolerance, that the po way is more willing to take risk to assert its interest. and then if it raises the temperature too much the us go back down. so for instance, there was that video from a few weeks ago of a chinese naval vessel cutting off a us destroyer in the taiwan strait. and i think the calculus in aging is that

essentially, if they become unpredictable and really raise the temperature of the taiwan strait and within the 1st violent change, united states will blink and say, you know, we don't want to risk something like happened in 2001 with the 3 incidents cuz we don't know where that ends up and therefore we'll back down. so i think that this, this will require the united states, as i argued to my peace today, to accept more risk and more friction and us china relations to ensure that the balance of power doesn't or roads for just before you came on, we were talking about reports of an informal nuclear agreement with iran to effectively call a political face, find stabilize tension. say, i'm, you seem to argue in your piece today that the us should be moving in the opposite direction with china over taiwan. and instead of demonstration, willingness to turn up the heat if necessary as well. i think china has really been driving dynamics and the taiwan strait and it has been using pre tests whether that

speaker hello sees visit or president sign when meeting with speaker mccarthy in california. to, to change the status quote. and so you have pretty authoritative statements from people like secretary of state anthony blinking. but she just thing has determined that the status quo. oh is no longer acceptable and it's taking steps to change it in china's favor. so the binding ministration continues to talk about the status quote, as though withholding and all sides are respecting it. but i think that's not the reality on the ground. so the us has to recognize that actually china is taking these steps to change it and figure out how we can increase deterrence and how we can change sheets and things talk to us. i don't think that a concept over taiwan is imminent. i don't think the staging is ready for a conflict with the united states, but i do believe that we're moving in the wrong direction here with regard to taiwan. okay, that's a fast and i think and slightly scary. i could to talk to david sacks from the

council on foreign relations. thank you so much. thanks for having me or the, the whole go uh, let me tell you about the famous italian vintage color. i see mila amelia, which has now begun holding 400 classic vehicles, many dice. in fact, the 1960, so i've left the press here on, on the top of it's really be 1600 kilometers a journey takes on the special significance this year as it travels through regions . finally hit by severe flooding. the 5 day rice and this weekend when the cost per ton depressing. well, today's almost done by the conversation continues on buying new, find us on social media channels at the w unusual act. feel. gail overall in depth analysis is always dw d, w dot com have a good day the

the to the point, clear positions, international perspectives. after much preparation, ukraine's long awaited counter offensive has begun. and while its forces are still

reporting their gains and meters, experts say the progress is credible how we're putting react. that's our topic on the enter the conflicts own with sarah kelly. after months of speculation, the login says a paid a new cranium counter offensive appears to be under way. my guess this week on complex own is ukrainian deputy prime minister all her stuff and need to know who overseas ukraine integration into the un nato. what more does she need from partners to future proofs? ukraine's defense conflict zone. 60 minutes on dw the the f b i. c, i a and most of that has been haven't seen him for 20 years. the song of a k,

a tom lee is considered the most dangerous time. we fund way was sort of the as we say, the poster child for the the cliff freshman problem. and then it is said, no one has ever seen a stone in the side of the super powers. the world's most dangerous frontage. dogs june 29 on dw, the ukraine has long awaited counter offensive has begun. and while its forces are still reporting their gains in meters, experts say the progress is credible as ukrainian force has pushed to take territory and russian occupied south and east. they are relying in part of western supplied weapons like these levered tank.