the, the artificial intelligence has taken the creative world by storm making things possible that artists could previously only dream of thing, must install with them. and if machines are smarter than humans, the machine has the power. do we want to give the machines the power to control us? i don't think so. one of those, he says, 02 algorithms to be doing the work. a creative artist become redundant. yeah, i think a are is replacing artist, but i don't think it's necessarily bad. we're some see a great opportunity other seeing if to danger a i can be good. it can be, but like every technology withdrawal and you can kill and you kind of amazed and it's, it's our choice. what we do. it is the

at the 2022 venus be an ali, a caused quite a stir. she's the 1st humanoid robot to make her own art. with the help of artificial intelligence, her inventor, a british gallery director, aden miller developed her with a team of computer scientists, robotics experts and designers. ada perceives the environment through cameras and her eyes. algorithms process the information and provide impulses for drawing the robot than single handedly determinants or creative output without any human intervention is mentioned. and i think what fundamentally interesting is people about robotics and artificial intelligence is that it's like a replica of themselves. it has something akin to a divine function and creating intelligence with i am creating another human being

. and i think that triggers the age old human log into play. god means of god. should we fear robots or welcome them? hello robot is the name of the exhibition at the vitro design museum and the german town of bi alarm rhine. it focuses on our destination with robots and artificial intelligence. a i for short, and the tense relationship between man and machine austria, anomaly client, you rated the show which has successfully towards the world. take a look at this me and if ops, the technology is coded. everything in our world, like a thin layer of color. that's just the fact of turnville and there's no turning back now that the genie is out of the bottle. and that's why we have to keep asking ourselves as individuals and as a society how we want to implement this technology. the industrialized world can no longer function without its intelligent machines,

but the outlook for the co existence of humans and robots swings between new topic and just stopping between hopes for a better mechanized world and fears that human agency will get lost. yeah, man and the stain describe a robot who writes manifesto it was and excitedly, that's intellectual work, as we know from politics or aren't. but that robot is as dumb as a door knob come. didn't notice the vocabulary, grammar, and syntax, and it has no clue about what it's writing. hardly any other phenomenon has captured the imagination of the movie industry as much as the vision of artificial beings then not only have an uncanny human appearance, but also far superior abilities from the trouble is to 2001 and blade runner to matrix science fiction films including many blockbusters have explored humanities, an easy fascination with robot. android and artificial intelligence

a stick seem to see to bash the left to can speaking. there's so many examples of artificial intelligences that have found their way into our brains and hearts through pop culture, shaping our image of robots and a i can see the things. that's why we're always disappointed when we come across a real a i or robots because are usually nowhere near as cool as the ones we know from movies and books. but where do the boundaries between a i and human creativity lie? will machines managed to crack one of the last mysteries and are increasingly technologies the world? how we feel emotions and turn them into art. mateo crees, director of the beach with design museum, is doubtful. gosh, you know, kind of what's doing in some machine or a great building, the toner, it's an irreplaceable factor. it's in fact, i didn't convince your that's the

but what can and can't machines learn? part is leon live in child offer some insight. he started painting as a child and by the age of 16 was celebrated by the art world as a prodigy and sensation earning the nickname baby because so he's one of the most successful german painters under 30 and famously willing to turn new ground in the quin finished one plus plus one desmond old. i find it incredibly exciting to combine these 2 components. and so that is pairing art with artificial intelligence when in order to bring the art to another level and break new grounding, making it even more innovative. he gets to be in quinn, snow in about 2 of us, and of course also to keep up with the time is that site to get me on dive and trout is taking part in a study that investigating the question, what do artists feel when they paint what goes on in their brain during the creative process for this purpose, the master class of the virtual design program,

that kinds of allow to and university of applied sciences measures his brain, waves narrow feedback shows that when he painting, he enters the kind of trend then it would be no cost to him. so i know we captured data from his movements and brain waves and the brush strokes he made gum stones of we recorded sounds and basically everything that could be turned into a numbers with novels done. and then we used algorithms to create data from all of that to visualize the image is what is used. and immersive spatial installation has been designed using the collected data. the artist is creative process can be experienced by means of an interactive surface. this gives the public, i have to extend the station of how it feels. nothing indeed, gets even put the thought that goes into the creative process. the abstract expression and energy i always have approaching my painting is something that many

people underestimate. the other thing that i can be dealt with the physical toll it takes on the body, but also on the brain. oh, good. so it's really a massive effort, mentally, as well. doing this intensive creative work for hours on end. does such about student does all entities, so all by the, in the future, the artist could possibly save himself all that effort. because artificial intelligence will make it possible to generate algorithms of liam, losing child's creative process and visual language using data obtained from the study. and produced images in his style, the beginning of the on. and you seem to see that there are parts of the brain that map certain creative work and processes viewing all. so theoretically you could have leon's, dreams interpreted and generate an image of them the next morning you'd bust, yeah, you're not good wanted. but leon moving charles creative process is still that of

a typical artist. he draws sketches and applies acrylic paint to the canvas without high tech, but with dedication and passion. but could a, i create something similar or even better, a moment to finish the whole night. that's right now i would say no, not yet. but i'm careful about predictions as to what might happen in coming years . because hey, i is absolutely powering ahead and direct in this whole topic will be surprising us a lot more to what we are made by a i looked like a brand new brand brand bought out by a computer in 2016, a new painting by the dutch master was unveiled, created with a guy instead with data from 346 of his works, a team of programmers, designers, and scientists from the delta university of technology. and a i,

experts from microsoft, developed countless algorithms to calculate proportions colors, gene light and shadow and substance with u v inc from a 3 d printer like oil on canvas. 148000000 pixels amounted to a portrait of a man between 30 and 40 years old, with a beard, had and color, and amazing result. what is it really art? dodge artist, veronica, go, dine, uses a i to explore relationships between human nature and technology. i believe that art is a reflection on society and post this question and i think a, i can also ask questions, but are they still meaningful? i think the artist will reflect probably on a i, and that's will be a to me true art. the sad thing about artificial intelligence is that it lacks

artifice, and therefore intelligence much has changed since john go to the ad made this statement. in 2018, the painting edmond did allow me became the 1st a i generated artwork on the market painted by an algorithm, stead with 15000 portraits from various periods. it was the 1st a hard work to be solved by christie's. earn some $433000.00 for the french art collective office, which provided the inventive develop, the family trees, gold frames, and the algorithmic formula in lieu of an artist signature. but when the machine is trained on millions of images and sophisticated algorithms create works of art, who deserves the credit ai, the programmer for the arts and artist that provided the data like because so rembrandt or van go

a i arteries as many questions not just ethical and legal ones for vince and bridge, who teaches at the berlin university of the arts. it's the mess of the artist that matters into some big coffer. what is my if this is one book, yet? if i buy a painting knowing it's buy bowski out, i'm more willing to spend a lot of money and look at it for hours. imagining him painting it in new york is the then if i see exactly the same picture, knowing it was only created by a computer algorithm. but these new i don't just look at the po, result in a, but i buy the story and the person a little bit closer to you, cuz she's to, depends on this in mid call. but what exactly does an algorithm create? what can i do? hey, i used the machine's ability to imitate logical thought and creativity once unique to human robots and machines are the hardware. while a i is the software standing in for the brain. machine learning allows

a i to continually develop, improve and deliver results on its own. almost in real time humans 1st the, the, a large amounts of data in the form of algorithms. rules that tell a computer what to do. the technology brings an unprecedented level of speed, precision and efficiency. but what about creativity? slow but the concessions. and again, i don't believe that artificial intelligence will replace the emotions of art and creativity any time soon. because the next steps would be teed open for so you can include this pure creativity comes partly from encounters with different cultures and people in journeys school and you mentioned using for the include and the artist brings all these emotions to the canvas. so i don't think i will ever completely replace the human artist couldn't stuff. is it some good? like a child's a eyes 1st artistic endeavors were doodle. british artist,

a computer scientist harold cohen, 1st developed in a i controlled drawing machine in the early 19 seventies era. and imitates human hand movements with a robot and paints its own pictures. the 1st simple shape between black and white. since the 1990 is more complex and in color. over 40 years to his death in 2016, harold cohen developed his art and technology raising the question the if what aaron is making is not art. what is it exactly the type, splendid thing that can come in? and even if we can create pictures that are super photo, realistic, or look like van gogh or other works that look completely original and groundbreaking. ultimately, we're also discussing the question of what's real and what isn't all. and if i get boxes, how can we create our own work?

i'm look to if he's an office. so how can i be used as a creative tools recently has been advancing rapidly in the field of image processing and generation freely available text pictures, systems like dog, e and mid journey have caused a collective earthquake. it has never been easier, faster or cheaper to create digital images. at the berlin university of the arts, vincent brits discusses the latest developments with the students and the artificial creativity seminar has come on. the seems like you can compare it a bit to when there was only classical painting and then suddenly the 1st photographers appeared, took off and they've got and there was certainly resistance. and people said it was an art. it was a photo plagiarism, whatever not. and, and then over the years and decades, the idea of

a photo artist to became established in con, i think it will be the same with artificial intelligence in fine. artificial intelligence can colorize historical film footage and seconds. but the programs show their limits when it comes to processing complex artwork. the problem with this, i think, is that, for example, if it's like an artistic video and the grass was pink because you painted the thing because it wasn't argued, we would make a green because it's basically just working on an advert slides. complex image processing, like shading and lighting, is no problem for the latest generation of a i base graphics programs. what used to take hours or days can now be done in seconds. this is such a dispute to list us. it's threatening, of course that more and more people can generate an infinite number of images and the images i spend a lot of time creating no longer have the same value. like but at the same time

they're just tools to master and use wisely and embedded in larger concepts. programs like dully or mid journey or disrupting the traditional creative process. the tools are impressively user friendly. enter text into the program in a eyes picks out the command as an image. creativity has no limits, even if the artist a quality is sometimes doubtful. the 2nd step is to keep a, as an artist, i find it more liberating and empowering to have new ways and tools to generate new imagery and new things. and i still see it more as an opportunity and as it does the match, once they've gone off, this one is funding victim that it's exciting that a designer no longer has to think about how to draw a picture. instead you think about how to best describe it so the computer can draw it. it's more or less the same job. it's not a completely different approach for the the job i'm going to comes on have, i mean, by the photos of people who don't even exist. every single pixel created by

a guy and disassembled from millions of photos of real people from the web. the advantage of somebody's butte from time facebook, imagine i download all the pictures from your facebook profile and load them into artificial intelligence and tell it to create your picture. then lucky unit does no more than look at these pictures and generate an image of you, of i kind of doesn't process an existing image in a business. and under each pixel is based on the photos of you, but is its own creation. and then it becomes difficult to discuss privacy rights, the visas, because we just had the students have concerns about data protection, copyright and ethical issues. and of course, they worry about a threatening their own careers. i cannot compete with this kind of intelligence. it will always be flawless, it will be always faster. on the other hand, they're our personality and our humanity. and our introspection. this

is actually what makes us sometimes better from this kind of a differential intelligence. the what is a i can develop its own creativity. how does it influence us? who's controlling who these were among the questions, address the new 2022 production address didn't opera house. the simple opa chasing water falls is the 1st opera with a libretto and score co written by artificial intelligence. and featuring a virtual voice, and impressive showcase for the technology. but humans, we're still in charge. right now we use mainly algorithms with a lot of different data inputs, but we still have some sort of control and i find that really hard to think of a situation where to control was gone. but then also for me to meaning is going to

pulling a i can be useful in the museum, for example, at the bell house archive in berlin. the company art plus comm, used a i to make the comprehensive collection visually accessible. museum visitors can use a touch pad to navigate their way through 15000 images, fully immersing themselves in the archives the berlin bay studio on formative makes 3 d models with a i, the process of what it calls a skilled thing is, can sold by humans. but not the result. the project demonstrates that artificial intelligence augments its learning quickly, improves continually and delivers unforeseen sculptures of a quality that surprises, even the creators themselves. once the computer is got control, we might never get it back. if we're lucky, they might decide to keep us as pets. entire

galaxies of artificial intelligence float above the compound of the us based agency nasa, an artwork developed by monica gord, dine and ralph. now the of studio drift with the help of artificial intelligence, hundreds of drones swimming patterns in the heavens, reflecting the natural intelligence of a flock of birds flying and memorization. studio drift award winning work has been inspired all over the world. the studio drift is faced in amsterdam. the 2 artists work at the interface between technology and nature. together with a 70 member team. delicate complex sculptures of light are created that of dandelions that have been fitted with ladies. studio drift creates part that shows high tech can be beautiful and poetic if you think about the classical artist,

you know, making imagery or it was yeah. working in a way that reflects to boss styles the i think a or is replacing artist. but i don't think is necessarily a bad thing. you know, because artist, in my opinion, good artist sugars to create a new version of the future. the studio drift also provided airborne arch for the 50 anniversary of the eggs didn't come on in 2022. more than $300.00 drones rose into the night sky and sparkled above hamburg. the concept of the light installation was inspired by the location and architecture of the iconic concert hall. unfortunately, some of the breaking wave stars literally made a splash, whether due to external influences or technical problems. during the rehearsal 15 drones fell into the water at the premier 5 more felt earth. further

performances of the live show were cancelled for safety reasons. everyone involved was disappointed. everything that is digital can develop a really fast because she can feel without real consequences because she can make the failures in a safe environment. but it's actually creating a, you know, an influx of a i, in the real world that is way harder. and we have physical artist no doubt, and our process on ways slower. because we only make physic work and that has to be saves. it has to be maintained and have to work for very long periods of time. studio drift is now working on a commission from google. quantum a i. the aim is to visualize how a quantum computer works. a process is millions of times faster than a conventional pc. the reason for its speed is that it carries out calculation steps simultaneously, rather than in a sequence. a bit like

a tree with many processes like growth and photo synthesis, taking place at the same time on the age limit less. there's no limit that's, that's the scary parts like week, week on comprehend where they can become, you know, like there's no control 0. it is a form of evolution, it's just like a next life for him that, that we, we can't imagine what it is like a monkey kind of content. imagine our skill sets and what we can become like same for us with a i google, quantum a i is based in santa barbara, california, highly sensitive quantum computers are developed here and this high security compound, the mega computers and norm is processing capabilities and speed will play a major role in the field of artificial intelligence in the future. they can already solve problems that would take a normal pc about a 150000 years to solve the. it's kind of like

cheating in a way, as you know, like processes of humans and the evolution of nature goes over millions of years. and basically just like skipping a couple of millions of years. artificial intelligence is a technology with unforeseeable potential. will it take us forward or an i latest? and what role will it play in art? will it remain a tool of creative or will it replace them? at some point, will it not matter who or what creates a work of art, human or machine? like in a year to be surprised or some a i creating an art piece that you know is just so out there that we like this is a whole new arch style. um uh yeah. but also next to that like, is that the right question to ask like a who cares about arts? if we will click on existing is rolled anymore because it's getting us to ensure a it doesn't spin out of control. there needs to be some guard rails, not just an art, but in politics to this most mention of it we need to retain the work of

humans is of course a robot might even be able to do better. but to i want that on the no, i don't even if we humans are still slot and i still want to negotiate with another human, to hammer out laws and a framework within which we can work with technology and invitation of silver a. i lead us that our own game. will it make artist redundant? only time will tell. perhaps sooner rather than later, the

auto 64 countries, the ultimate homosexuality of conflict. nearly half of a right world view is clash on this street debates and i wrote it to police. men will address it to detain you for being perceived. as you can see i the problem started with religion. i don't think responsible for these licensing is actually teens. 77 percent.

no, it's not good and still economical. new z, all the homes that goes all out on hybrid technologies of in addition to the s u. v range ot yet comfortable. but is it also efficient to everyday use rad 60 minutes on people in trucks injured when trying to see the city center more and more refugees are being turned away. families. these straight pieces extreme getting 200 people around more than 300000000 people are seeking yes.

because no one should have to flip the make up your own mind. w. made for mines the this week on the 77 percent street debate. the question of eligibility in this country has never been a question because based up in the states, we're not supposed to exist. street usually when it comes to almost 4 we unfortunately we like, oh so that you can so you so you do what do you do? what happens do you try 6.