Skip to main content

tv   DW News  Deutsche Welle  July 13, 2023 2:00pm-2:16pm CEST

2:00 pm
the, the, this is dw, use mike from the, the in thailand sales to evict and you probably minister, despite winning recent elections, pete and then general dot couldn't wait in support in the parliament with by just to reform strict product monica, the doors and produce the military symptoms also coming up germany's foreign minister on bales, a new approach to china. i mean, rising political intentions on
2:01 pm
a lead, a bad bulk statesburrow the names to reduce its dependence on its biggest trading products, but not at all costs. the benefits will and welcome the united nations human rights office says it's found evidence of a mass grave in sudan, west the full region where at least 87 people were buried. last month, the un office says it has critical information that the break away rapid support forces power. miller, drake and their allies carried out the mass. again. it says many of the very people belonged to a known arab ethnic muscle. each group, their bodies were dumped into shallow graves near the city of elton ida. if the 5 months has escalated him present weeks with bible military factions of both a months now, as costs can be used in charge of sedan operations for the norwegian refugee
2:02 pm
council. his board, he had to say about the latest development. well, there is very little. yes, that's we know beyond what has been uh, announced today by the united nations. what we do know is that the doc for is the, the seeds is the theater of widespread. the thrust of these, we see that through our own stuff, many of them have to flee, and many fled through to, to south. so don and, and, or other areas in the country itself that but they've flats from my suckers, from all sorts of attacks on civilians in civilian infrastructure. on our offices and warehouses have been looted. so it's, it's still to my home. it's got that stuff. if ford has the videos that i'm today is the, the ottomans proof, if you like that these up to us of these are leading, being committed, then we need to get to the bottom of who did this. and these people need to be
2:03 pm
comfortable over the policies. we've also been reporting, of course, on the funding in and around the capital cartoon. how is the for linked to the ongoing fine? i was there for is the, the, the dynamics that are slightly different than that. there is a huge ethnic component. so the fighting that we're seeing around the floor, which is historic and, and it's, it's what that's the previous ethnic cleansing and genocide and, and good for. but that's, that's probably what's, what's happening right in front of our eyes and the, the fighting in the floor to come in to longer to start. but once the, the, the cartoon was, was in dolton, gave us a there is that has to be in this or fortunate stick rise in, in environments over there. obviously links to, to the rest of the company, but also with, with its own dynamics making it an extremely difficult scenario. it's completely
2:04 pm
out of funds for us as a human again, organization right now, we cannot operate safely. a lot of our stuff are, are, are really in for their lives, in a lot of people leading from, from that for and actually injured that in very bad conditions. and many of them are not even may managing. so make it of a life cause kimberly thank you very much for joining us there from the norwegian refugee council is in charge of sedan operations and was going to be there from nairobi. thailand's frontrunner to become prime minister has failed to secure a pile of entry. support. peter, the natural dot was the only candidates but could not gain enough votes from they'll make us, we will there. he's reform is the combination. one major general election. he is not able to secure the support of the military backs, members of the senate, which he needed to become prime minister. a 2nd vote for the top job is expected next week. the dead pledge to reform strict laws, protecting the bonus and reduce the military's inputs or so what does this vote
2:05 pm
mean for thailand and what happens next? questions i put to philip, show a show correspondent for the sunday times of bangkok, movies and continues to um have just uh kind of take a problem is that he's the former qu lita, who has been in powerful 9 years that were elections in may as you've mentioned the, the reformers coalition led by move forward policy, a aggressive new force and talk politics was the surprise uncomfortable winter in those elections, but to become prime minister is not just enough to have the majority supports of n, p, as in the lower house, which peace of mind living sure it does have, but he also has to secure support from on the left to send it says, who are appointed by the phone with jumped up and today's debate of the joint chain, but really focused, very strongly own move towards desire and push to reform restrict royal defamation
2:06 pm
laws on the uh, the conservative forces in database, so military party empties pro, military and pays or a set. it says, just repeatedly attached to these funds for phones, comparing them to attempts to sup uh the mona k, which is extremely powerful and strongly institution inside long and um, yes, um, ultimately, when the boats came in, although he um, had a comfortable lead amongst them. peas, he fell to show top enough folks amongst the 2 chambers. so what's next? the target? yeah, well we are face a pay rate perhaps of paralysis here. the opponent will reconvene next week in the room in coalition. those about that they will resubmit fits those names, but unless they move forward box down and roll reforms as things started unlikely he'll be upset when round enough of senators to get through. and then we're into positions where, you know, lots of bathroom negotiations, coalition deals. this tool could,
2:07 pm
whether representatives of one of the pro military parties could sticks together. enough numbers with the senate says, is a very on such and time. what is very likely, as we'll see over tons of street protests which have characterized the timelines, the last couple of decades be supported to move forward. the very angry they noticed them have punting one of the selections, fairly suero and much is the largest bounty. and they feel that they send it as a floating, the democrats, it will. so we have protested all districts yesterday and they will be returning again and coming days. they sites particularly if next week, a seems very likely pizza does not come on, is too much as prime minister. the analysis sounds like us, they have from philip show, well the sunday times in bang call. thank you very much for joining us here on dw companies cabinet says approved its 1st ever strategy for dealing with china, its biggest trading papa, but also a potential geo political bible. the new policy says german companies must the risk score reduce that dependence on badging without cutting off cooperation reasoning,
2:08 pm
supply chain problems and human rights issues. so of course, concerned about in germany's farm is not in a bad bulk, introduced the strategy the listen die out. we need to focus on our economic security more. i mean is that so that means that costs the risk of the don't just impact the individual side, but rather impact the entire national economy must be minimizing, look easy. it mission lines and a bit stuff is on, on exempt the flip switch task companies that make themselves particularly dependent on the chinese market will increasingly have to bear the financial burden of this risk using cold cash that zip scott and miss and the part of the economic security is that the companies need to ensure that in their supply chain and they are aware of the human right, all these products and ensure that they are not violated. it's naturally we have
2:09 pm
a responsibility to human rights all, but we also have to reduce the risk for germany as a business location and also europe. because if we accept the violations of human rights and that's about this will also have impacts on, on european countries here. so in turn in and let's bring in using hot, he's a foreign policy space person for the opposition city. you see us, you group in the german parliament, welcome to dw use. tell me a bit more about this strategy. it says, we want to keep our close economic ties with china, but we want to be less dependent on them. is that possible? or? i think there's one big leverage for us altogether to of interesting things to behave in trying to have to come back to amar in relation on i level between germany and, and try. now this is the economic relations because not only we in germany, in europe and also america and have some advantages of good trade relations with
2:10 pm
china. it's also wise to close out. the chinese government can only convince people that to the leadership of the communist big body is the right way to around the country if they can purpose of a proposal of welfare to all of the people. and this is depending on good traits, relations to the rest of the birds, and therefore i should, i think we should focus on the question, how can we match our cannot make power? how can we make our an understanding of free trade and a fair trade in the road between european union north america? katya is evan. to convince china to, to stop some, a behavior which is not in ibis fair traits. and if they have policy in the roads, and this is why i missed this strategy, that it, it's probably be a little bit too late. gemini, the more and the leads and that quest and the not follow up on other strategies that like north american or european union and a 2nd,
2:11 pm
we should more engage as germany in finding out what are the coming positions of the union of north america off to that and on some challenges coming out of china, i think the chinese government booby enable it to, to join a project to find some guidelines for the further relations economic relations. but also political relations and duration is concerning climate change and reduction of carbon emission. and therefore, germany to do more than we did in the past. oh, in which direction. let's take a clear example here while waiting for example of chinese tech company. but the us proceeds as a national security threat is currently responsible for 60 percent of germany's 5 g network. how does that fit into this new strategy? i am a group of members of the dodge of wouldn't start fight forth against the share of i'm well a in other chinese companies in german and a mobile and,
2:12 pm
and that's i think it is. and the rabbits also government now on the fact. but we have to make sure that you can replace as of technology increase or decrease the critical areas by allowing technologies, maybe the one that made up in your opinion or the about up together as north america or japan or korea other partners of supreme road. and i, so i think we should do more on that. but from my point of view, it'd be a lot. so should use the chance to find the common sense us between north america and europe on how to handle on china and traits relations. because china can, nor a strong voice of both of north america and europe, and maybe a wants of japan and korea and to eventually united kingdom. and on all of the questions we have on china. for example, if china is able to, in west, in the west about, for example, to buy a part of the handbook, how about why is it not possible for you being gen companies to buy parts offer
2:13 pm
a share on, on the chinese hovers. the basic line is play by very different rules. yeah, they play bad by very different routes of a. we have our own rules. from my point of view, we saw a task that runs across a t. m on the fields of economic relations. and if shine of what's happened is not the knowing how about how about to buy a share of the shy of it. i think we should been in the buying a china. i share also, i'm a problem. this is maybe a problem. i should be comfortable result of that strategy. unfortunately, the chance the office is against what level of pop problem business. what about politics regarding taiwan, the new strategies states that germany is actively working towards the escalation. but if china, which, when they tie one, which is threatened to time, and again, how should germany respond a this is a m, if question uh that will be onset also together was american,
2:14 pm
the american friends and on the common european union position. and i think we can lift a shot and i can live with a situation as it is between china and taiwan. and the rest of the world kindly footsteps stopped to school where we said this to systems one state. and there's no violation, no address. if behavior of china against taiwan and that in case that china might detect taiwan, this would significantly change the reservations of most of the west on both countries to china. and i think china would not go there for us because otherwise they risk a huge share of their welfare coming out of the trade with international arena. and people in china would not appreciate the government that is harming their cannot make future of the country. because this is the so to say the and the, the treaty of the government was the people that the direct dictatorship off the commenting spotting can exist because people accept a, because they bring the country forward concerning economic development. if not.
2:15 pm
and if the chinese government, it's um housing, it's fundament off of a power, and i think they will not do okay. we'll have to leave it that you have and they'll make a huge hot thank you very much for being on. they don't even use by and that brings you up to date on bed visible and i'll have most, it's national headlines, 46 down by the the 6 the is it is someplace how into the more people than ever on the move world wide in such a base in life with a crisis within 500.

21 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on