[000:00:00;00] the and the courage bridge wasn't on your end and back in 2018. the 1st vehicle to cross had none other then vladimir putting behind the wheel. it was an easier of the longest bridge. and one that stood for putin's aims to permanently tie you crane, or at least the parts of it, he legally annexed in 2014, through russia. the symbolism is huge and so is it strategic importance? it is to this day, the only bridge connecting the crime in peninsula and the russian mainland. it serves as a crucial supply route for russia's military. and today it was partially destroyed for the 2nd time in less than a year. you create and wanted to damage an emblematic reminder of russia's invasion and had put in where it hurts under construction. berlin,

and this is the day i the system to this morning started with the news of the emergency that happened to the crime in bridge the but the, one of the sections of the bridge was damaged as a result of a terrorist act committed by the special forces of ukraine for some reason, we asked for travelers and residents of the convention and not to go to the crime in bridge, but to use alternative land routes. our initial response will be to achieve the goals of a special ministry operation. also

on the day, the death of a young woman after being detained by a runs morales, the police sparked nationwide protests. now the patrols are back seeking to impose these law make republic strict dress code on one. a good thing to morality. police can prevent women from not waiting or who to happen and will they cannot enforce it . like before. the number of people who do not be too high. now, they cannot 100 or 5. they come to the show. the strikes came in the dead of night. 2 explosions have destroyed a section of the courage bridge, brush our claims, the blast killed 2 civilians and brought down a section of the roadway connecting russia to occupied crimea. when it was inaugurated president vladimir put in the lead a convoy across to mark the event, the bridge is the most potent and most hated symbol of russia's occupation of premier. the territory moscow annexed illegally from ukraine and 2014. now the

bridge has been damaged for the 2nd time in 10 months, that cuts the main supply route for russian troops fighting and southern ukraine. that is another blow against moscow's forces. still reeling from a mutiny last month. but she was ready to cry me uh, damaged once again. this footage released by moscow shows russian investigators picking through the debt break. at the traffic on the bridge was suspended. moscow says 2 people were killed. and what the russian president described as a terrorist act by the cranium government is a direct the roadway on several spans of the crime near bridge was seriously damaged. both road and rail traffic were temporarily stopped with their line waiting for a concrete proposal to improve the security of this strategic key important transports infrastructure. it's not, that's definitely won't be constructed in 2015 after russia annex the crime in

peninsula. it's a vital supply line full must go to access a legally held ukrainians, have a treat as the bridge was 1st attacked in october last year, the cranes government place that suggested it was behind the attack. there never claimed responsibility outs rights in key many ukrainians welcomes the latest the souls of the bridge know which of will at least it will be future deliveries of women's and provisions. and that might, we can the next couple of minutes which just took so yes, it's uh, helping us, i guess, a little bit. not so much when they will do, they will be angry and attack ukraine. haul the bows out. that's all they are capable of. this and this one is that most guy has said it is racing to repair and we already put in the bridge that's by strategically and symbolically

important to russia. dates claims a cry. mia chris walker is a former us special representative for you frame and a former us ambassador to nato. welcome to the day, mr. investor. let's start with the attack on the coach bridge. what ways heavier, hear the psychological impact or the military advantage? so well, i think it's a combination. i do think it's important for ukraine to be able to knock out the ridge completely. it seems that they were able to take out the road lines, but the rail line may still be functional. so they'll need to go after that one more time, but it is important to disrupt the russian logistical supply chain that is feeding and supplying the troops that are in crimea and southern ukraine. certain logically, for russia, i think it's important, i think what will be even more important will be breaking the, the land line of communication, the land card or that can ex rust of the in southern russia to crimea.

ukrainians could break through that. it was certainly name there currently is cut off and that i think will have a strong psychological impact in russia. new brand, new officials have been quoted all be anonymously saying they were behind this attack. they're usually a lot more opaque about these kinds of operations. what can we read into that? well, 1st of all, i think they are trying to avoid taking direct responsibility just to create some kind of mystery. now not being clear about how exactly it happened, but i think we can be very confident that it was in fact ukrainians that did this. uh, these bridges don't just follow up on their own. and in addition, i think the ukrainians feel a little bit of pressure to show that there are results from their counter offensive. and the movement on the ground has been slow. and i think that's one of the reasons why they're a little bit more open about taking credit for this to show that they aren't capable of taking down the russian forces. yeah, let's look at this counter offensive because after last week's nato summit that i'm

wondering if can you've can really be sure that the support from his partner will not depend on what you are just changing at fast battlefield success. yeah, i think the we are in the clear for a while still we have strong bipartisan support in united states republican and democrat, both houses of congress, the white house, i'm sure that we will put through another supplemental agreement or supplemental budgeting package that will give us funding to help you brain drill all the next year. so i think those things are likely to happen. that being said, i think the administration itself is a little concerned about if the, the conflict becomes really a fail me. then what do they do? do they continue just applying the weapons and, and not seeing much progress or is it time then for to push for some kind of negotiation? ukrainians, of course, are very much against that because they know that russia is not going to give up

any territory in negotiations. they want to keep digging more their, your brains are concerned that there's going to be some, rob linus on the western part. yeah, talking about why believe us on the western parts, the nato summit last week. i want to share something with our readers that you wrote about it. because you said that nato not giving you create a roadmap for membership, reflect a failure to understand that the nature of european security has changed. you said ukraine is currently doing nato's job for it, fighting to defend the frontier of a free europe. it's more capable militarily and most allies and the funding, the values on which nato is founded. russia is attacking ukraine because it seeks to defeat those values. key remaining stuck in the nato waiting room is a green line for improvement to attack. again, that tell me, mister ambassador, how dangerous could the stalling technique become? not only for ukraine, but for all of your as well. exactly. it is dangerous for all of europe. for a long time, for 70 years,

we were able to defend the borders of nato territory and not worry about the outbreak of a large war in europe that would impact the security of nato countries. that's no longer true. we have a war in europe right now, and it is impacting the security of every natal country and many countries outside of us, we're seeing refugees was leasing the disruption of energy supplies, massive insulation, and so on. and tremendous economic and defense cost of motor hours. so this is no longer cost free. so today what needs to happen to the end of it is where you're going to be admitted to the alliance and a firm border establish with russia yet again. that would be the thing that establishes and security in europe in the long term means in the near term. we have to signal that this is where this is going and help give you credit what it needs to win the war as quickly as possible. those are the things that would cause bruton to start to recognize that he will never succeed. if we don't do those things,

if we have this vague and as soon as walk like this, it encourages prudent to keep the war going. so why is the west not doing that? what is behind this reluctance? some argue that having ukraine and nato is even against the national interest of countries like the us or germany. yeah, i think it having the ukraine having ukranian nato was very much in the us in german interest. it will stabilize security in europe. we will have clear borders again in the future. we will have one of the most capable countries in europe, militarily on side with the rest of the alliance. i think all those are great benefits, but it could all work, drag nato into a major conflict with russia, and that is something deadlines is, of course, seeking to avoid. that's correct. so that is why i think leaders don't, is particularly us and germany did not want to say anything stronger about ukraine

coming into the lives we made it. very vague implies the allies don't agree on this and the apply to there are some conditions that have to be met, but they didn't specify with those are, so that was a very weak signal coming out of the building site. and the reason is, just as you said, they didn't want to create an impression that nato was in a conflict with russia. it's only ukraine defending himself against russia. they also are concerned that russia has nuclear weapons. and that's one of the reasons why they don't want to the image of being in a conflict with russia. problem with the on that is a rush, disease itself in conflict with west already. and just look at the number of things that russia has done. whether it's assassinating people on german or british style, whether it is shutting off the energy supplies to europe or trying to use it as a weapon. webinar using refugees and immigration. all, all kinds of things that are a threat to europe from the west opposite from russia. that treatment

continues to do right now. so we're not, we're not fooling the russians or we are not keeping ourselves out of any conflict . simply by not saying that you drain has a pathway to membership russians already see it as not crit hawker, special representative for ukraine, formerly. so and a former us ambassador to nato. thank you so much for your time. thank you. us and around showing hair has become an act of defiance. ever since a wave of protests swept the country last year after a young woman died after being taken into custody by the morales, the police for allegedly not wearing her huge job correctly. going out without a head scarf, became a political statement, no to the regime, no to the oppression. in the midst of the social uprising, the religious police had largely pulled back. but now runs leaders,

say the patrols or back and will enforce this law. make republic strict dress code, but many women say they will not be intimidated. there is plenty of hair on display on the streets of a rod's capital to run. while women are blinds to wear a headscarf. the young generation in particular, is spoken to defying the rules of the islamic republic. now the door teeth are getting back. police as the only jody from today, the police patrols will be established throughout the country so that i know in addition to the other duties, these police officers will deal with those who unfortunately ignore the consequences of not wearing the property. he jack, and insist on decided buying the norms on that, hon. georgia. can you throw that on here on street? it morales. the police are set to patrol the streets again and you pushed forth

women to add that he job despite their reputation for brutality. not everyone is willing to have that looks policed. the good thing that morality police can prevent women from not really their hytcher. they can not enforce it like before. the number of people who do not be too high. now. they cannot 100 or the 5 pages that the last thing they can do is use violence enforced against us of the morales. the police have been lying low since the deafening custody of 22 or else do not mazda. i mean, he arrested last september for not wearing her head stuff. the incident sparks months of protests and the violent crack down that was on the 500 people killed and 20000. the rest is now that the protests have died down. the rise, conservative leaders reasserting though, sorry to on public life. and for more on this, i'm going now by my hold on,

mary margaret i'm. he's the director of around human wrong space in oslo. mr. and we're walking down. welcome back to the double, you know, can you tell us how the ringing people have been reacting to this renewed attempt to force women to wear this woman cut square? well, and thanks for having me here. and you see a people in the wrong, they know that the rundown of authorities are doing whatever they can at to get prepared for the 1st anniversary of the nationwide protest. and in the last 10 months, they have managed to have control over the city. so that you haven't had to be processed as focus in the corners of the country invalid, which is done in particular. but what's the haven't managed to do is to control women. so, number of people who i've been a walking out in the streets defying the rules of this, let me trip populate, have been too high. and what you're doing now is trying to get control before down

the grocery. do you believe they will succeed in pressuring women into wearing the headscarf into covering up and to effectively disappearing from public life again? but m c, v are dealing with erosion that doesn't belong to the, our time. you know, we have the gender apartheid, half of the population have to do what the, if you, who are really in the country say. so these kind of system cannot survive for a long time, but they have money so far because they use expensive force, you know, besides more than 500 people who are killed on the streets in the last 10 years, about 600 people have been hired and ended on execute that the 7 of them are a protest. there's so they do whatever they can to extend their survival, but they can continue forever. i read it. i'm surprised how international community

and how to go to tolerate that in 2023 women are treated as 2nd class citizens. they are at the regime use this force on them to make them we are of what they say and they are still part of the international community. and they are sitting in the chair my she fucks a is humor, right. you and human rights concepts associated for them. know, what should the international community do in your opinion. this should not be tolerated. you know, we international community to then tolerate the racial apartheid in south africa. it's as easy as that. this the way they are treating women should not be told the right that you run and politicians are traveling. they are meeting with their west and counterparts. that should not happen. i mean, is it comp the acceptable for the world today that human beings just because the

a women are treated the way they are doing doesn't have any consequences for the reaching faced with this lack of international pressure or sufficient international pressure. um, do you expect to see your resurgence in protest following the announcement of the crack down even before the anniversary of the death of geno mazda? i mean, you know, eh, knew, protest can come at any time because it's not only as oppressive regimes. it's also a highly incompetent and corrupt regimes. they are not able to solve people's daily problems, financial issues. so it is just a question of time at newport. this can come at any time. and this is why they are trying to spread as much fear as possible among people. so that the next book, this will not be completely out of control. but i'm sure that you brought this

weekend. i was married. well that, that most around human rights. joining us from also thank you so much. i. let's imagine not recognizing your spouse not remembering your child's name, not knowing how to take care of your most basic needs. that's a painful reality of millions of people around the world living with alzheimer's. now us drug maker, eli lilly says it's experimental drugs done on a mom can slow down the development of the disease. patients with the disease will inevitably deteriorate, but the company says that process can be delayed by 4 to 7 months. eli lilly, once the federal drugs administration to approve its product, they have da turned down a request for early approval earlier this year and demanded further trials. the company says those trials show that drugs slows,

the development of alzheimer's and 60 percent of early stage patients. but also reported significant side effects. let's take a closer look and bring in the eric rivera. he's a professor of medicine and clinician educator and the division of geriatrics at the university of california in san francisco. you also wrote and editorial published alongside that eli lilly report in the journal of the american medical association today. doctor of, of darrell, welcome to the day. now people obviously want a magic bullet to treat all timers. is this it a small step forward? um, and it's gonna take a lot of small step forwards. what we're seeing with this drug is it's not a cure. it doesn't reverse dementia. so if, if you progress to the point of, for getting people, it's not going to get that back. what it does is it slightly lessons the worsening of technician and function compared to placebo. when you get this drug with a caviar,

there's also some significant side effects with the infusions of these drugs getting really expensive cost. we saw some ducks associated with treatment and there's other issues like brain bleeding with this and fusion of the drug. uh huh. it's something that we talked about during the pandemic. if the risks out way, the benefits, what would you say in this case we're talking about swelling of the brain. mind crow bleeds? should people still go further than should be if they approve the strong? yeah, so um they, they approved a very similar drug with very similar outcomes called la, can't imap so i don't see a future where the fha is not gonna approve this drug. but i think you're right, it's all about this balance of benefits versus risks. and the benefits that we're seeing, you know, the primary outcome, what they looked at, it was a 144 point scale. and when you looked at the cbo versus those who got the drug, you saw a 3 point difference in this 144 points. so i would say it's, it's a small difference, how clinically meaningful of that, i think is

a big question to the bait. but we're also seeing other things like less people progressing to the next stage of use, which for me matters more than kind of the scale. so that is hopeful with upset again small differences the, the big concerns is that a, you have to, for this drug, you have to go and basically monthly, which really can't about the other drug. you have to go in twice a month for an fusions then fusions looking at fusion reactions. these drugs also seem to cause micro bleeds in the brain, but i can call also cause these bigger basically it's and we saw 3 depths with this study. we saw similar 3 depths with the academy of study, another one of these amyloid antibodies studies. and um, you know, cost is gonna be a big issue including cost to the health care system, to medicare and also cost of individual patient. because there will be co pays for many individuals, which will put this drug out of reach as it's probably going to be marketed similar to the catamount somewhere around $25000.00. just for the drug,

not for the infusion. multiple m arise, the pet scan. so this is going to require somebody to really be able to work closely with the health care system to get all of this stuff. and the biggest issue too is that for a lot of individuals, they may live too far away to one of these centers to actually have access to it. yep. they want to do it and that's a big yes. because there, this is not a silver, but there's not a drug. i would say absolutely. yes. you should get this if you have mile cognitive impairment for jerry for really awesome reviews. it's a clear know if they have moderate or severe all cyber sees. but it really warrants a discussion with the health care provider is going to help me more than it's going to hurt me. this is not the 1st drug aimed at removing deposits of proteins from the brain of alzheimer's patients. are the researchers on the right track here in your opinion, or are there more significant factors that could then maybe show more promising results? yeah,

i think i think the strike this trial tells us 2 important pieces of information. one is, there is a big debate about whether the amyloid the m or would hypothesis is, is real. this is the thing that we should be targeting. is there any evidence that it works at this drug and la canada have both show us that there's something going on there seems to be this effect. it's doing something, although that effect also is really small. this drug is exceptionally good at removing m a lloyd from the brain. now if it was just them or that was causing the problem, you'd imagine people do a lot better than is very, very small changes that we're seeing on these like 144 point scales. and that may be um, because we are targeting the wrong thing or we have to target multiple different things, which is probably what we're going to do. maybe it's similar to cancer drugs in the future where you have to do multiple different things. or you may find out a whole new path would be better than this animal. lloyd targeted eric with era of

the oh sorry, yeah. test it. one more thing. yes. we only have that data for the 1st 18 months, so we actually don't know. it's also going to happen 3 years down the line and there's some concern because of these individuals who get the drug of more brain atrophy. what does that mean? 34 years down the line. so we definitely need longer trials, assessing the advocacy and safety of destruct. all right, so you would say there are too many question marks at this point for approval. i would say that it's likely to be approved because we have the same question marks with the can't imap which got after you approved. i think this requires a very good discussion about risk. some benefits if you're going to start this drug . i think we know now that drugs probably going to be in the wild sometimes. so uh the health care system is not very good at that. so we'll have to see what actually it looks like in a while. we'll have to leave it here. thank you. so much eric,

we're there at the university of california in san francisco. thanks for having me . a mess our time. so make sure to turn in again tomorrow by the a pulse, the beginning of a story that takes us along for the ride.

it's about the perspectives culture information. this is the the news w. mine's returning looted offs is a moral obligation for gemini this key. the former colonial power wants to make amends, especially for its crimes in africa. thoughts repatriation brings about its own new privilege. returning looted restitution in the cross has of world politics close on him. 60 minutes d w, the

assassination. it's stop some one move back in the day she goes hitting the country's features to the big guessing pushed back even from their own families and shrugged on pricing so. so loans seeking is self determines life. douglas says go from drudgery and abuse the oldest fis on d w. the around the world climate activists have attacked works of art for them. the reason is clear or i