the, the sisters laid halogens, the arms race is on and the whole world is watching a i can paint, but i can go and can even help paralyzed people walk again, but there's more to it, it can monetize and it can amplified this information is a i also, nation, well damn nation today on ship. the technology is pretty advanced. it can ride academic essays, identify cancer cells, or even replace people like me. but where they are, they are new gateways for misuse as well. a crime is on the rise. one, d, b, d, for example, available on the document, it can ultimate the perfect fishing attack, but that's not all hope frances, in a pop reject the image went viral earlier this year and was generated by

a got one that could be seen as a joke. so called deep face can cause great harm. just recently, the republican national committee released this a i generated election in the clip, warns of at the stove, bee and future. should the current president joe biden make it to the white house again? i am not morgan freeman. what you're saying is not with you. what you see is a defect, a technology driving a scans, a deep big kind of go, a chinese national out of $600000.00 us dollars. a scam or use a software to impersonate glows, best print on a video call manipulating go into revealing his bank details. that's not the only way i can be used to. manipulators. that's even more allow me is the potential use case of last language models and providing this information that is messages, but a deliberately intended to be misleading. and here i worry that large language

miles might enable propaganda or at scale. and in a way that's tailored that we've never seen before. as for example, the news agency void tested the chinese a chat box ernie and found that it was reluctant to answer questions about the chinese president, gigi, and ping, or about more recent events in china is history. it's unclear whether this was intentional for a programming flaw, but it shows just out easily a i can amplify misinformation. a i has also been known to discriminate against people, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and all these. let's say complex complex algorithms and data sets are shepley kate, the biases that the humans have a, a recruitment systems for example, have been shown to be biased against women. it's been proven that facial

recognition technology is less accurate for people of color with people being arrested for crimes. they never committed experts and politicians in many parts of the world, one to regulate the use of a i. in july 2023. the un security council met for the 1st time to discuss the risks, even the head of the company behind to t p t. sam altman, is proposing more regulation for a i at the us senate hearing in may 23. he pointed out the dangers of the technology, i thought the also says, the opportunities outweigh the risks of those i calling for you. i development to be stopped completely until regulators catch up by google's top executive fund up to try also one say i to be regulated globally. that's because he claims his technology is as dangerous as nuclear weapons, which i seems to be serious about the executive ones to make certain things unavailable for users. google's checks to video ai for not key will not

generate clips depicting people. for example, hundreds of researchers and entrepreneurs are calling for a pause in a development among them signed up to try and test lubarski, learn much of an open letter for such an a moratorium has been signed by more than 33000 people. but the call could also be an elaborate corporate move for big players to catch up with the top developers. after all, mosques, new company, x a i is working on its own chatbox truth g p, t. even google's chatbox part can't keep up with chapter p t just yet. so one reason for recent calls for fries could be economic rivalry. clicked up to china approves, there's more to it than just the cannot make interest. the government, the, it has realized the potential a house to consolidate its power type. thoughts in china seem to be reluctant to

say anything critical about the regime and since 2019, the government has been using ai to monitor people and evaluate their behavior. the you, on the other hand, is looking to band a eyes the valence legal standards for a use of being drafted. but the so called a i act still needs to be give them the green light. was this image created by artificial intelligence? it's not always easy to tell. content or products generated by ai are set to be labeled in the future. one of the pillars of the use new a i act. we ask for a, a degree of transparency. we want. busy to know even when they are interacting with the safe check, bought that this is not the person, it's a check. the priority is the regulation of a applications that might interfere with people's fundamental rights. we have to try the to a breed. are these 2 approaches,

approval fund them in the rights and protections? and on the other end, they need to sustain innovation and development of the ai, a ai will be regulated to varying degrees depending on where it's applied. for low risk tools, such as intelligent spam filters, there will be fewer requirements. strictly regulation is in the works for applications that could more seriously impact a user's lives. for example, a i tools that pre select job applicants for that to check customers credit ratings, alias systems, themes are too dangerous will be banned altogether, such as biometric surveillance systems for social scoring applications. companies that use a will have to register it in an e u y database a systems and how they operate will be open to the public to ensure the maximum transparency is the leading the way for

a future with a i or is it putting the brakes on innovation, the impact of these regulations is already showing. for example, in india, one of the world's largest tech markets for many companies that are working with europe and companies, they have to what in art about the regulations. because europe is sort of taking the lead in terms of regulating a stable lightning data for many people in india, a i is already playing a central role in their work. so we'll start that's coming up both in terms of developing new algorithms and also using a systems for various applications, you know, from dating to finance, through harris agriculture you know, across the board. so, so that's the very exciting part about it. but for

a long time, india's government wanted nothing to do with regulation. despite experts, warnings, the european parliament passed its version of the act, setting the tone a applications are to be regulated, much like the block chain based web 3. the discussion is well under way. as to how the laws should look. so one is it needs to be bias pretty. you know, it could be gender bias, it could be community buzz, they should buys these things. the 2nd is accountability. you know, i can barely, now i system. i can use it in many applications, but then if it fails who is accountable, is it mean the vendor of that system is, is the person who deployed this for now, the debate in india is focused on the protection of user data. the ethical aspects of a usage. however, having taken center stage data protection is hotly debated in the field of a i largely due to the fact that the eyes are trained with vast amounts of our data

. companies like albany, i google meta say they won't sell. i data, but ultimately users have little to no control over what really happens with it. a chat g b t collection stores all entered requests, even if users delete conversations with the box next to the data and user profile, the chat box can store information about the device used, such as the ip address and precise to your location. ideally, a chat with an a, i should be like a conversation between real people. but this can lead us to reveal much more than intended a company's handle user data to improve their services. many companies use the input to train the a i itself. the thing is, once the i system, i've seen that data, it is very and it's memory, you know, just like us who months i see

a person. and then you say it is like person from a memory. it's not happening. same with 40 i. if you can already days it from its members. so what does that mean for us use us in any case, we don't have much more personalized advertising. microsoft, for example, recently started using catchy p t and it's search engine being information gate there could be used towards tailored advertising. we should be mindful of what we tally. i systems, for instance, employees that companies like amazon to allow it to use templates for work for a few of leaking trade secrets, the one that so many countries are working on a loss right now and let and america however, there are different concerns. argentina, for example, uses a i to monitor it's price, it's still regulation isn't the top priority for latin? american governments says research or via treats because i need to divide in the field. it's bradley. i make a latin america is more than capable of training people yet for the modules

educated in our universities are quickly drafted from the region i work in, i logos, or even by moving to the entire and a lot though it is impossible to compete with the incentive strategy search that exist in the sphere any a foreman with us when you will see that it at the outset on not a bit. on the flip side, companies and rich countries outsource a lot of the human labor behind a. i will jump on a while now there are many simple jobs here, like paper work or training media itself, syndic jobs, you don't need much school enough for what seemed poorly paid, precarious work is outsourced to the so i cool, well specialist trained our universities work in the north oh, so i'm going to put it already so give you step better face on the interface. initial corporations have been using this strategy for decades. one size fits all rules for the industry may change that in the future. single pose government is relying on voluntary self regulation by companies when it comes to

a i. this could make single pool, a global hotspot for innovative a i development. but it could just as easily pay the way for misuse. what this means for you is this will only become the parent in the future. so is regulation hom, for to innovation, or should i be more tightly controlled? let us know what do you think that is it for me? so you next time my the shuttle actually cutting you daniel's engine. you belong to the 77 percent to come to i don't good, i'm 65 full was last those top 5 years. 3 reasons why. 1115 . we are here to help you make up your mind. we are here on please find your mind. so talk to you from campbell, fixed a new culture and in 15 minutes,

left side of our community life on the research is now on speak. talk these committed coin is great for investing the invest. these are the everyone here just wants to get into big old clint coins, digital gold. and we wanted to stay here in central and south america. they're known as big green arrows, digital gold, diggers. investors from all over on moving to latin america in search of bitcoin treasure. nowhere is the crypto currency founded more highly than here. but for many, the frenzy ends in ruins. we were promised high speed rails but so far there is no sign of the coin in latin. america starts august 18th on dw.