thing that we weren't able to score and the 2nd goal is just to be a scientist yourself to and then in spite and decided to allow her all, it's really painful to concede and so late on top of a low speed to not traditional tests. but i think we actually put in a good performance of a on dish. always. how many are using guns on the you're speaking with the, what's the most inspiring you, what would be a combative match that they would throw everything at us and that they must be a here would be tough with 90 percent of the stadium against us. it's still impressive when you experience it on the pitch complements to columbia on them. yeah, come to mend on the call him donovan. this is dw use. thanks for watching the side. it says to move on to the basic goals facing the country with

featured guessing push fast even from the families. i can be the only that was the weekend to use it a lot more now i will actually on the, on the, on the slicing social and seeking their self determined life. let's go from drudgery and to be stuff. august 5th on d. w. it's a federal intelligence, the race is on and the whole world is watching a i can paint, i can go and can even help paralyzed people walk again, but there's more to it, it can monitor to us and it can amplified this information is a i l a salvation. well damn nation today on ship.

the hey i, technology is pretty advanced. it can ride academic essays, identify cancel sales or even replace people like me. but with a i the new gateway. so miss hughes as well. a crime is on the rise. one d, b, d, for example, available on the dock that it can automate the perfect fishing attack. but that's not all hope frances, in a huff or jack of the image, went viral earlier this year and was generated by a lot more that could be seen as a joke. so called deep stakes can cause great harm. just recently, the republican national committee released this a i generated election in the clip, warns of at the scope and future should the current president joe biden make it to the white house again?

i am not morgan freeman. why do you see is not where you, what you see is a deep faith, a technology driving a i scans a deep take kind of go by chinese, national out of $600000.00 us dollars. a scam or use a software to impersonate glows, best print on a video call, manipulate and go into revealing his bank details. that's not the only way i can be used to manipulate or perhaps even more alarming is the potential use case of language models and providing this information that is messages but a deliberately intended to be misleading. and here i worry that lots language miles might enable propaganda or at scale, and in a way that's tailored. so we've never seen before. as for example, the news agency void are tested the chinese ai chatbox earnings and found that it was reluctant to answer questions about chinese president, gigi and ping or about more recent events in china is history. it's unclear whether

this was intentional for a programming flaw. but it shows just so easily a i can amplify misinformation. a i has also been known to discriminate against people, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and all these. let's say complex complex algorithms and data sets or shep placate the biases that the humans have. a are recruitment systems, for example, have been shown to be biased against women. it's been proven that facial recognition technology is less accurate for people of color with people being arrested for crimes. they never committed experts and politicians in many parts of the world want to regulate the use of a i. in july 2023, the un security council met for the 1st time to discuss the risks, even the head of the company behind to, to be the same. altman is proposing more regulation for

a i at the us senate hearing in may 23. he pointed out the dangers of the technology, i thought the also says the opportunities outweigh the risks of those i calling for you. i development to be stop completely until regulators catch up by google's top executive fund up to try also one say i to be regulated globally. that's because he claims his technology is as dangerous as nuclear weapons, which i seems to be serious. the executive wants to make certain things unavailable for users. google's texts to video ai for not key will not generate clips depicting people. for example, hundreds of researchers and entrepreneurs are calling for a pause in a development among them signed up to try and test lubarski law. not an open letter for such an a moratorium has been signed by more than 33000 people. but the call

could also be an elaborate corporate move for big players to catch up with the top developers. after all mark's new company x a i is working on its own chatbox truth g p t. even google's chat box part can't keep up with chapter p t just yet. so one reason for recent calls for our fries could be economic rivalry. clicked up to china, proves as more to it than just the can nomic interest, the government, the it has realized the potential a i has to consolidate its power to thoughts in china. seem to be reluctant to say anything critical about the regime and since 2019 the government has been using ai to monitor people and evaluate their behavior. the you, on the other hand, is looking to band a. i is the valence legal standards for a use of being drafted. but the so called a i act still needs to be given the green light was this image

created by artificial intelligence? it's not always easy to tell. content or products generated by ai are set to be labeled in the future. one of the pillars of the use new a i act. we ask for a, a degree of transparency. we want people to know even when they are interacting with that safe check bought that this is not the person. it's a check. the priority is the regulation of an application that might interfere with people's fundamental rights. we have to try the to a breed. are these a 2 approaches of pearl, fundamental rights and protections, and on the other end, they need to sustain innovation and development of the ai, a ai will be regulated to varying degrees depending on where supplied for low risk tools, such as intelligence, spam filters, there will be fewer requirements. strictly regulation is in the works for

applications that could more seriously impact to users lives. for example, a i tools that pre select job applicants for the customer's credit ratings, alias systems, themes to dangerous will be banned altogether, such as the biometric surveillance systems for social scoring applications. companies that use a will have to register it in an e u y database a systems and how they operate will be open to the public to ensure the maximum transparency is the leading the way for a future with a i or is it putting the brakes on innovation, the impact of these regulations is already showing. for example, in india, one of the world's largest tech markets for many companies that are working with europe and companies, they have to what in art about the regulations. because europe is sort of taking

the lead in terms of the regulating a stable lightning data for many people in india, a, a is already playing a central role in their work. so we'll start that's coming up both in terms of developing new algorithms and also using a systems for various applications, you know, from dating to finance, through harris agriculture you know, across the board. so, so that's the very exciting part about it. but for a long time, india is government wanted nothing to do with regulation. despite experts, warnings, the european parliament test its version of the act, setting the tone a applications are to be regulated, much like the block chain based web 3. the discussion is well under way as to how the laws should look. so one is it needs to be biased pretty, you know,

it could be gender bias, it could be community buzz, they should buys these things. the 2nd is accountability, you know, i can barely, now i system, i can use it in many applications, but then if it fails, who is accountable? is it me, the vendor of that system is, is the person who deployed this for now. the debate in india is focused on the protection of user data, the ethical aspects of a usage. however, having taking center stage data protection is hotly debated in the field of a i largely due to the fact that the eyes are trained with vast amounts of our data . companies like open a, i google meta say they won't sell i data, but ultimately users have little to no control over what really happens with it. to chat g b t collection stores all entered requests, even if the users delete conversations with the box next to the data and user

profile, the chat box can store information about the device used, such as the ip address and precise to your location. ideally, a chat with an a, i should be like a conversation between real people. but this can lead us to reveal much more than intended a company's handle user data to improve their surfaces. many companies use the input to train the ai itself. the thing is, once the system is seen, the data, it is then its memory, you know, just like us who months i see a person. and then you say it is like person from a memory. it's not happening. same with 40 i. if you get already days it from its members. so what does that mean for us use us in any case, we don't have much more personalized advertising. microsoft, for example, recently started using chat, c, b,

t and it's search engine being information gain. there could be used towards tailored advertising. we should be mindful of what we tell a i systems, for instance, employees that companies like amazon to allow to use templates for work for a fee of leaking trade secrets, the one that so many countries are working on a loss right now. and let and america however, the different concerns argentina, for example, uses a to monitor it's price. it's still regulation isn't the top priority for latin? american governments says research or via treats, present each a less of the method. yeah. not of this world, the north and also divide in the field is bradley. how many cut it out in america is more than capable of training. people see that it, for individuals educated in our universities are quickly drafted from the region by working i local, or even by moving to the entire and a lot though it is impossible to compete with the incentives research that exists. and then i've done this year and a half a foreman, and with this one you will see at it at the outset on not a bit. on the flip side,

companies and rich countries outsource a lot of the human labor behind a r i. well, my not why not, there are many simple jobs here like paperwork or training the a i itself can pick job. so you don't need much school in a for me only seem poorly paid, precarious work is outsourced to the so i cool, well specialist trained our universities work in the normal. so i meant that, but it could be so because it's the website, it's on the interface. initial corporations have been using this strategy for decades. one size fits all rules for the industry may change that in the future. single pulls government is relying on voluntary self regulation by companies when it comes to a i. this could make single pool, a global hotspot for innovative a i development. but it could just as easily pay the way for misuse. what this means for you is this will only become apparent in the future. so is regulation hom, for to innovation, or should i be more tightly controlled?

let us know what do you think that that for me is you next time my, the a ticking time bomb on the vista. a deacon mission to chemical plants threatens deploys in poland. largest river toxic waste is contaminating the soil and seating into the ground water. one resident tries to warn officials, but their response has been hostility, polluted, and poisoned on c w. americas generally within the sprains. the country now has more guns in people

while active as lobby for stricter regulations. the number of mass shootings continues to rise of the is there still hole in the battle against gun violence. gunn, nation. in 45 minutes on dw d double use crime fighters are back africans. most successful radio drama. serious continues. all episodes are available online course. you can share and discuss on the w africa's facebook page and other social media platforms, crime fighters to name. now, the re not to have a logic is waging a battle against authorities who do nothing in the face of an imminent environmental catastrophe. here at the side of

a former chemical and arguments factory.