about checkers paralyzed, tighter societies, computers that are similar to governments that go crazy for your data. we explain how things, technologies work. that's how they can also watch it. now the, it's a physical intelligence, the race is on and the whole world is watching a i can paint, but i can go and can even help paralyze people walk again, but there's more to it, it can monetize and it can amplified this information is a i'll a salvation. well damn nation today on ship. the

hey i, technology is pretty advanced. it can write academic essays, identify cancel sales or even replace people like me. but with a i, the new gateway for miss use as well. a crime is on the rise. one d, b, d, for example, available on the dock that it can ultimate the perfect fishing attack. but that's not all hope frances, in a tougher jacket. the image went viral earlier this year and was generated by a lot more that could be seen as a joke, so called deep stakes can cause great harm. just recently, the republican national committee released this a i generated election in the clip, warns of at the scope and future should the current president joe biden make it to the white house again? i am not morgan freeman. what you see is not what you, what you see is a deep face. a technology driving a scale is a deep face, kind of go by chinese,

national out of $600000.00 us dollars. a scam or use a software to impersonate glows, best print on a video call, manipulate and go into revealing his bank details. that's not the only way i can be used to manipulate that's even more allow me is the potential use case of lots language models and providing this information that is messages for the deliberately intended to be misleading. and here i worry that lots language miles might enable propaganda or at scale. and in a way that's tailored that we've never seen before. as for example, the news agency void tested the chinese a chat box ernie and found that it was reluctant to answer questions about chinese president, gigi and ping, or about more recent events in china is history. it's unclear whether this was intentional for a programming flaw. but it shows just so easily a i can amplify misinformation. the me i has also been known to discriminate

against people, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and all these. let's say complex complex algorithms and data sets are shep placate the biases, that's the humans have a, a recruitment systems for example, have been shown to be biased against women. it's been proven that facial recognition technology is less accurate for people of color with people being arrested for crimes. they never committed experts and politicians in many parts of the world want to regulate the use of a i. in july 2023, the un security council met for the 1st time to discuss the risks, even the head of the company behind to, to be the same oldman is proposing more regulation for a i at the us senate hearing in may 23. he pointed out the dangers of the technology, i thought the also says the opportunities outweigh the risks of those i calling for

you. i development to be stop completely until regulators catch up by google's top executive fund up to try also one say i to be regulated globally. that's because he claims his technology is as dangerous as nuclear weapons, which i seems to be serious. the executive wants to make certain things unavailable for users. google's texts to video ai for not key will not generate clips depicting people. for example, hundreds of researchers and entrepreneurs are calling for a pause in a development among them signed up to try and test lubarski longmont. an open letter for such an a moratorium had been signed by more than 33000 people. but the call could also be an elaborate corporate move for big players to catch up with the top. a developers. after all marks new company x a i is working on its own chat box truth g p t. even google's chat box part can't

keep up with chapter p t just yet. so one reason for recent calls for fries could be economic rival for a quick look to china proves there's more to it than just the cannot make interest. the government, the a has realized the potential a i has to consolidate its power to thoughts in china. seem to be reluctant to say anything critical about the regime and since 2019, the government has been using ai to monitor people and evaluate their behavior. the you, on the other hand, is looking to band a. i is the valence legal standards for a use of being drafted. but the so called a i act still needs to be given the green light was this image created by artificial intelligence. it's not always easy to tell. content or products generated by ai are set to be labeled in the future. one of the pillars of

the use new a i act. we ask for a, a degree of transparency. we want people to know even when they are interacting with that safe check, bought that this is not the person. it's a check. the priority is the regulation of a applications that might interfere with people's fundamental rights. we have to try the to breed. are these 2 approaches of pro fundamental rights and protections, and on the other end, they need to sustain innovation and development of the ai, a ai will be regulated to varying degrees depending on where it's applied for low risk tools such as intelligent spam filters. there will be fewer requirements, strictly regulation is in the works for applications that could more seriously impact to users lives. for example, a, i tools that pre select job applicants for that to check customers, credit ratings,

alias systems, themes too dangerous will be banned altogether, such as final metrics, surveillance systems, for social scoring applications. companies that use a will have to register it in an e u y database a systems and how they operate will be open to the public to ensure the maximum transparency is the leading the way for a future with a i or is it putting the brakes on innovation, the impact of these regulations is already showing. for example, in india, one of the world's largest tex markets, for many companies that are working with europe and companies, they have to what in art about the regulations. because europe is sort of taking the lead in terms of the regulating a stable lightning data for many people in india, a,

a is already playing a central role in their work. so we'll start that's coming up both in terms of developing new algorithms and also using a systems for various applications, you know, from dating to finance to his side, because you know, across the board. so, so that's the very exciting part about it. but for a long time, india is government wanted nothing to do with regulation. despite experts, warnings, the european parliament passed its version of the act, setting the tone a applications are to be regulated, much like the block chain based web 3. the discussion is well under way as to how the laws should look. so one is it needs to be bias 3. you know, it could be gender bias, it could be community buzz, they should buys these things. the 2nd is accountability, you know, i can barely,

now i system, i can use it in many applications. but then if the, if the phase who is accountable is it me, the vendor of that system is, is the person who deployed this for now, the debate in india is focused on the protection of user data, the ethical aspects of a usage. however, having taking center stage data protection is hotly debated in the field of a i largely due to the fact that the eyes are trained with vast amounts of our data . companies like albany, i google meta say they won't sell i data, but ultimately users have little to no control over what really happens with it. to chat g b t collects and stores all entered requests, even if users delete conversations with the box next to the data and user profile, the chat box can store information about the device used, such as the ip address and precise to your location. ideally, a chat with an a,

i should be like a conversation between real people. but this can lead us to reveal much more than intended a company's handle user data to improve their surfaces. many companies use the input to train the a i itself. the thing is, once the i system, i've seen that data, it is then it's memory, you know, just like us who months i see a person. and then you say it is like person from a memory. it's not happening. same with, for the i. if you get are the days it from its members. so what does that mean for us use us? in any case, we don't have much more personalized advertising. microsoft, for example, recently started using catchy b t and it's search engine being information gain there could be used towards tailored advertising. we should be mindful of what we tell a i systems, for instance, employees that companies like amazon to allow to use templates for work for

a fee of leaking trade secrets, the one that so many countries are working on a loss right now. and let and america however, there are different concerns. argentina, for example, uses a to monitor it's price, it's still regulation isn't the top priority for latin? american governments says research or via treats because then each a less of the method. yeah, not of this world. the north and also divide in the field. it's bradley, how many kids out in america is more than capable of training? people see that it, for individuals educated in our universities, are quickly drafted from the region by working i local or even by moving to the entire and also it is impossible to compete with the incentives research that exists in the northern hemisphere. any a foreman with us when you will see at it, at the outset on not a bit. on the flip side, companies and rich countries outsource a lot of the human labor behind a. as i move my not why. now there are many simple jobs here,

like paper work or training media itself, syndic jobs, you don't need much school enough for what seemed poorly paid, precarious work is outsourced to the so i cool, well specialist trained our universities work in the north. oh, so i'm going to put it already. so given that to say this on the interface, initial corporations have been using this strategy for decades. one size fits all rules for the industry may change that in the future. single pulls government is relying on voluntary self regulation by companies when it comes to a i. this could make single pool, a global hotspot for innovative a i development. but it could just as easily pay the way for misuse. what this means for you is this will only become the parent in the future. so is regulation hom, for to innovation? or should i be more tightly controlled? let us know what do you think that that for me is you next time my, the

sometimes the right. how that you out to the highlight for every week? not the, not the you. how many platforms can you handle single tenuously without having the feeling that it's just too much? it might seem easy. how much can we do simultaneously? multitasking diesel, modern methods? because if we do too much, we paid it all wrong. we messed things up. risking brain damage. so let's stop this self sabotage, humans and multitasking. watching our new to the w documentary. imagine how many

portions of loves us turn out in the world right now. climate change, if any home story. this is much less the way from just one week. how much was going to really get we still have time to work on doing flux, the subscriber for moving is like the of the when do people feel free? united and independent for the life of young people, it's when this celebrates and through. so i'm done. for the last $150.00 d is the country on the gold, 60 host, it's a traditional song, and tom's festival. there are

people who simply can't live without this festival, without the smallest one. yes, think i'm crazy about music speaking to them. it's this is jane speaking. it's in my blog at the post the progress you lena's, from russia. auto minds is lovely in 2 cultures in one country. politically, a difficult relationship. both are relevant to the festival. here they are o one p for the, the full, the grams, and all the concepts. the participants must practice 5 years know twice a week. they rehearse traditional songs with roots and photos but also in proof.