yeah, hello. okay. hi is on everyone's lips, and the people who look at the subject of both simple and fit into as well, who is what are some of those who develops generally to say i according to great to regulation, go to what was good off. believe it was that many of the dangers of digital technology on not just the looming that is on the horizon, they are here. but actually, he's probably the digital divide is inflaming an inequality of this is your love. you hate somebody doing this information in conspiracy favorites on social media platforms are spread. yup. and up to 5 by a i so convent, the undermining democracy and fueling violence and conflict in real life love. you can see a lot of it online surveillance and data harvesting of all enabling human rights abuses on a mass scale. he loves input as a stick and technology companies and government so far from finding solutions. excellence teams. we must move fast admin things. new technology is required,

new we know, but the forms of governments. we've inputs from experts building this technology and from those money targets of uses. and we have jobs, we need the global, digital phone packed within government. so these organizations, the private sector and civil society to meet the guy, the risks of digital technologies. and i do even see finding ways to how does that benefits for the good of humanity. some of called for policy that i should have a new global entity on a i, this was provide a source of information and expertise spell them as states is that many different models inspired by such examples of the international atomic energy agency, international civilization organization. all these have governments on panel on climate change, and do you have the sense read the 2 most of the global lending policy discussions if needed, depending on the decisions of member states to help advance the search for complete governance solutions. i will, the point is mom's so high level advisory board,

the owner of the official intelligence, which will provide the recommendations by the end of these years. and next you have some of the future is the one seen a generation opportunity for progress to view with these new steps in line with the vision view and chapter member states, we'll decide all to move forward on the new edge of this piece, the global digital phone fact reforms to be in special financial out to texas. and then you have the proposals to address the challenges and being great to just be some equity to global involving us excellencies, deducted nations was created precisely for moments like these moments of maximum de, just a minimum agreements. we can ins, most use our tools, inflexible and creative ways. last months, we saw the dividends of the 3rd in the nation of the coast of human getting 1000000 barrels of volume, the decaying f s o software. the super thank that was

a ticking time bomb looming get a logical these are splitting the red sea, but no one offered to solve the problem. so the united nation stepped in and brought to work together. we will realize the resources assembled, the experts, navigate to difficult legal stations and build for us. we have more work to have the more resources needed, but less most of the hardware successfully transferred from the software. these un live action save the, let's see. when no one else who's on woods you when the 3rd in the nation book, the job done, the sparts, our long list of global challenges. that's the same speed it's it's, i mean, nation can guy those forward. this has to be the thought. i mean, with the will revisions and thoughts piece, determined to uphold the degree the works of every person. determined to realize the sustainable development goals and the fact equally leave no one behind the time

being 24, multi left at least for the 21st century. and come together for the coming boots. and i think the and that was the united nations sex re general antonio view terrace, an opening and giving the opening address of the un general assembly addressing a whole range of issues. the saying the world is becoming on the head. and we are not react saying, and cooling for a change. modernization, calling for compromise and determination of chief international edison. richard who okay, is hit with me in the studio to talk about what we just heard. the richard,

what did you make of a i'm to do a good terraces speak of his speech. he painted a pretty big picture. doesn't they have the world? yeah, i mean, while we were just before he spoke, kind of referring back to his speech from last year, but he started out saying all wellness in big trouble with grid. lots in colossal global dysfunction. and if you look at what he just said, you, you said that our world is becoming on him. she said this time around, we seem incapable of coming together to respond. so again, you know, quite a warning, but we've had, it wasn't just last year was in the year before that i think he's been several years now. he's been kind of binding this drama, the united nations trying to trying to draw attention to the, to the fact that the world is simply not tackling some of these major challenges. and is it, it's risk and getting to fraction to, to be able to tackle them? and i think pretty much in the same vein, of course, at the end of the speech, you know, he doesn't want to end on a completely dismal sort of notes where he thinks, well, everybody thinks, well, we might as well go home then trying to bring up some, some positive examples, but,

but yeah, i mean, if you look at the scope of this speech to combine everything from climate change to the war and you crane to to injustice and global development. you really see the scale of the challenge. and this is something i think he's, he's almost like year up on. yeah. the beginning and trying to yeah, beat this same drum and it clearly some frustration that, well, this is not heating these polls. let's talk about some of the specifics that he mentioned. i mean, very early on, he did address russia's invasion of, of ukraine. how does he put bass across? what was he cooling for that? yeah, well, i mean, i think he was saying that be essentially if there is a breach of you and tell us that. but this is a, you know, it's an invasion of a silver and states an infringement of it's, of his territorial integrity, this kind of language. do you often hear about it? but, but the simple fact is that if you, by doing that, russia is putting so just the pregnant risk. but putting global stability at risk with raising the risk of new capable, well,

so by breaching these principles of these international norms, you simply don't just go in and evade your neighboring country because you want to take it over. so that, that, that, that is a threat to the entire stability of the well, because it is, it is a breach of these fundamental principles of the countries might find themselves on the receiving end of that too. so, so that was a pretty robust a section from, from good terrace in the middle there. but i think there's a sense from him and i think we'll see this little so from other leaders, particularly from west and lead us that they, they don't want to really focus entirely on the claim for this very much. the major focus for european be dismissive for, for the, for, for the americans at the moment they're very heavily focused on new credible. but there's an increasing and growing consciousness that, that the rest of the world and particularly the global south. and it has a different set of priorities and a thinking, well, the west is very much focused on this, but what about our, she's with,

with climate change with all sorts of other problems. so i think that will be watching joe biden, of course, coming up and, and other speeches would be interesting to see how they kind of moderate that message on you, ukraine, compared to last year. of course, it will also be hearing from will let them use the lensky, the ukrainian president. and i think would be interesting to watch him how he tries to reach the global sales. and to that, to shape is message of what ukraine is going through and how that becomes more relevant to the global. so you mentioned climate change, obviously something that affects every single nation, every person in the world who was quite specific, wasn't it? he said, you know, i really don't think will lead has a feeling the heat. and he did give some sort of concrete examples of, or ways of trying to push people lead his nations forward. i mean, his did his sort of urging on climate change work, do you think it was effective? well i, it's a tough one because climate change, of course,

either it is this kind of conflict between the urgency and the importance and nobody really use it until at the what we've seen with these, whether this offices of the last couple of years, the political pressure on the political lead has to take an action often hasn't been bad because they're talking about things that are much more urgent. but they don't necessarily see that the enormity of that the challenge that the climate change represents. and i think well just to the g 20 just recently, there was a lot of the base of the g 20, about what kind of commitments to put it back on climate change into the statements coming as of the g 20. and that ended up being a commitment to, to drastically increasing the amount of renewables, but that was not a commitment to the same time phase out fossil fuels. and i think what you're hearing from the terrace is that the, the era of fossil fuels has to end. and you cannot just talk about the one side of it and not talk about the other side of it. and i think some of the, the,

the most striking lines of the, of the speech that came up for me in terms of the but in terms of climate change was, has produced full square attack on, on the oil giants and saying, i think i just treated this just a moment ago that the fossil fuel age has failed. if fossil fuel companies want to be part of the solution, they have to lead the transition and that there should be no more bank rolling of climate denial. i think that's pretty tough language. i'm him that's but in terms of the political leaders, i'm fight is the simple fact that there are very few countries around the world where you can point to the given country and say they are really doing what it takes to get to the $1.00 degree global warming target from rich countries to developing countries, but actually nobody is doing enough. richard, thank you so much. we're going to take a quick listen to some of what i'm telling you a guitar. she said in that speech, and then we'll come back to the studio. the well, that's changed all. what do you see a solutions?

if not, we get off the effective date of this problems, as the easiest solution is, do not reflect the world as these. instead of solving problems they, it is becoming part of the problem. and the, the divides that deepening divides the ma get going on because really 30 forwards divides between north and south east and west. we are entering ever close that we're going to track so you need konami can financial systems and relations when that's what happens. a single open internet. we diverging strategies on technology lot, the efficiently intelligence and potentially flashing security frameworks is designed to renew multilateral institutions based on the 21st century, cannot become political realities, realty the equity solely that is the entity of, of sally p and including the principles of united nations jonathan, at the international law. that means reforming the security policy of the line with

the world of today. i that was the un secretary antonio gutierrez speaking just a moment ago, i once across. now to all us corresponding to know them aloud who's standing by at the un headquarters in new york inter now do you think the guitar or speak a speech at code, the main concerns of the of the members of this mesa? and what would you, what would you say? well, it certainly was a very sweeping speech. as we heard there, he took special play, a pains to address crises and conflicts all around the world, very much trying to communicate the message that a crisis or a conflict in a u. n. member country, no matter how small, no matter how poor should be a crisis for all the assembled countries here in the united nations is of course a balance on the dairy to get. and as richard mentioned earlier,

you took special pains to make up the countries that you mentioned, the smaller and vulnerable countries feel seen at a time where there is a worry that the ukraine war is taking up all the space and resources in terms of in terms of aid in terms of the minds of especially western allies, although it is important to note that so a part of his speech where he did get some applause, was when he said that he wouldn't rest in terms of trying to revive the black. see greenville that deal to get green out of ukraine because of course, so this is something that has impacted the whole world that has led to higher food prices and increased food and security. it's in places like africa, but yes, he mentioned the repression in myanmar. he mentioned the civil war, and to dawn he mentioned the ongoing humanitarian prices and account is done. so stories about our ongoing but have perhaps dropped out of the headlines as of late now, whether the speech was comprehensive enough to really tackle the concerns of the

whole assembled body. i don't know if that was ever and that you of all goals, we didn't, for example, hear him talk about how smaller countries are often dragged into great power rivalries. the china and taiwan issue remain sensitive, but he certainly made a lot of effort to be as comprehensive as possible. and that is what we saw. we've seen schriner and russia pushed more aggressively for an a new world order since the beginning of the war. and you train, would you say that we've been seeing signs of these growing divisions, the u. n. well, one of the leaders of china and russia aren't here, although of course, so in this list of absent leaders, you also have, you also have in the corner france, you also have issues who are not of the you k. so this isn't a evidence of division rather more of perhaps we're. multilateralism is

currently in the mental prioritization of the piece of especially friends and the u . k. but really, what we are seeing is that the ukraine war has pushed, pulls you have, especially the western allies on one side supporting you create and you have provide your states supporting rochelle and the global self pursuing non aligned or multi align strategies. and in a related vein, you also have them pursuing more regional alliances and more more forms of many lateralism think of. well, i just think of the brakes. think of it. think of the g 7 as such as these next days will truly be a test of you and effectiveness as a multi lateral body. and i think this is something that is very much present in guitar says mind the present in the people assembled here. janelle, thanks so much, that's janelle jim alone for us there at the un headquarters in new york.