rising domestic consumption during the war is not enough to sustain a sector that used to export 4 fifths of it's all. i'd set you up today. it's a take folks, and we'll be here in just a moment, but i feel dw business updates. looking at a gathering of industry leaders in london to discuss regulating artificial intelligence. i'll be back at the top of the we are all set and we're watching closely. we all seem to bring use a story behind the news. we're rolling about unbiased information all 3 months. the only way i can be on top is to create my own empire, discover stories to

just to click away the during the destination, right. document trees. subscribe now. name treat the world leaders and the biggest names in our special intelligence gathering london to discuss ways to regulate the industry. the gathering comes from it, concerns that the pace of technological development is pasting government's ability to regulate its capabilities. also coming up economy assigned the lar, if i had the global supply of oil, could be threatened by a further escalation of the conflict and then the least this is dw business on kate ferguson. thanks for joining me. were leaders,

academics on the tech industry insiders are attending the world. the 1st ever a i safety somebody's at leslie park in london, famous for being the top secret home of britain's world war 2 code breakers. the mason comes out of time of rapids developments within an industry that promises both enormous potential and terrifying risks. a blatchley bulk in leafy buckinghamshire here a team led by alan turing cracked in my coat, turning the tide of the 2nd world. well. now global leaders and industry experts hoping to crack the e. i cipher, one of the most significant challenges of time industry lead us some ottoman c, e o of open a i spelled out the risk for us, send it your district committee. my worst fears are that we cause significant. we've the field, the technology, the industry cost significant harm to the world. i think that having a lot of different ways it's images like these from china that have store feels

about a i in very it's going face recognition and public spaces. total surveillance in total government control orchestrated by machines, not humans. earlier this week, us president biden signed and executive order to place god rails on the use and development of a i such as binding the creation of deep fix and weapons. just like everyone else, he hopes to address the risk sophie, i was to tapping into its benefits and all the people who are involved and we're going to see more technological changes in the next 10, maybe next 5 years. and we see in the last 50 years, and that's a fact that the most consequential technology, our time, artificial intelligence is accelerating. that change is good, exhilarated award speed. hey, height is all around us. while the us is acting swiftly but the executive order, the european union's artificial intelligence act will not come into effect until 2026. given how fast evolves that looks like a long time,

ultimately exports hope government's getting both strict regulations on an industry that office tremendous opportunities, but also has the potential to devastate humanity is up to the court because leads the enigma cipher at blatchley bach ai is the new code to be correct to you, to our correspond because mazda is following that event of leslie park in london, i asked her how governments are trying to walk the line between fostering innovation and safeguarding society. it's a balancing act case. most countries are really desperate to attract companies that work with i because these are really the future technologies and everybody's trying to get a head start. but obviously we also know that the big risk involved and the technology, but even the experts don't even know what these machines will be able to do in the future. critics, i'm pointing out that there is actually, there are wrist at all, much closer to home and they're being address of being forgotten here at this

conference. because there are, there are risk, for example, when it comes to spreading fake news. one expert told me that in the future, within really lightning speed of fake news, altered images, altered videos, could be distributed around, well, much fos, to even then they can today suit experts according for more extra regulation. these attendees here and richie, so not the same is not really to develop a regulatory framework, let alone an international regulatory framework. but it's a common understanding, but experts saying that this is not enough and that the countries need to build something very false. the need to build frameworks at home and then needs to be more monitoring of companies and mobile ensuring of these technologies. on the question of a common understanding, though, we know that us vice president come la harris is attending this event, as is european commission present was left on the line and us tech to general antonio gutierrez. given that a i driven technologies have such

a global reach almost by definition, how feasible do you think it even is to reach anything close to a global consensus? is there a different? definitely a lot of initiatives when it comes to artificial intelligence, that's something on the you end of the us as just put out an executive order. that's us companies to be much more transparent when it comes to artificial intelligence. the g 7 have come to an understanding and also the youth is very close to publishing what they call the author official intelligence at which is from what we know the legislation that would go further in terms of actually regulating the sector. so there are many initiatives on many different levels, but what prime minister student wants to have here, he wants to have the top x pads really, the top brains, some of the code fathers of artificial intelligence, a he at the summit and he's got some of the really top take executives to really

talk about where, where i need to be the guard rails of the future and how on an international level, how, how can the risk be mitigated? and whereas the common understanding of the risk of artificial intelligence. yeah. until he of those big brains, uh, one of the people attending will be some altima and who find it open a i, that's the company behind shot c p t. elaine moss is coming to what message can we expect from them? so these big companies are driving the innovation when it comes to artificial intelligence. and we know that, you know, in most has, in the past one of the dangers bought at the same time companies. what's much ross, us health regulate then being subject to very onerous regulation on national or international level. i have spoken to

a delegation that work in the european defense company and they are saying, well, it's really a regulation is important. but on the other hand, we need to make sure that we, that the democracy's all based of the not losing all a speed, we need to be on top of it. so we can stop the research, we can stop the innovation, we need to move as fast as possible, so that the democracy's all winning that right. so there is, there is a balancing act companies will in some sort. so, so to a framework that wants to know where they can stop, but at the same time they don't want to be regulated too much. they get them off in london. there are no to some of the other global business stories making news we work is funding to file for bankruptcy as soon as next week. that's according to a report in the wall street journal. the flexible work space provider has present in 39 countries around the world, but a struggle to cope with a mazda of debt pile and heavy losses. chinese real estate joint advert ground has proposed a new death restructuring plan, but with the offshore bondholders trade,

their desk for 30 percent stake in the company to hong kong bay subsidiaries ever gone. bondholders would like to see major losses and interest payments if they agree to the terms. thousands of government workers have barricaded roads in the band with su, capital cost demanding a 3 sold rise in wages. the countries textile industry kinds for 85 percent of total export. western companies like audi, das h them and gap are among the companies that purchase goods combined with that sheet money to or have a for russia's invasion of ukraine. there was relatively little public awareness of how much the world relied on ukraine for the supply of grain, or how much of europe depended on russia for its energy supply. now is the devastation, conflict continues to unfold and mid least. some are beginning to wonder what the bigger economic bombs and occasions might be, especially when it comes to the global supply of oil, which could be effective if

a ron, which becomes more than foiled and the conflicts. the region is also the key shipping routes with disruption to key waterways like the suez canal and the strength of remove potentially causing delays and delivery. earlier i spoke to cost him, but yet the chief economist, i n g. i asked him what a possible escalation involving iran could mean for the global supply of oil. indeed, i think this is where this contract and we'll have be, are repercussions for the rest of the world. so just looking at freight is very naive, but the oil is an extremely important one we saw already when, when the, the, the terroristic attacks on israel started the process started to search. if you're on one way or the other was to be involved in this conflict. you're on being unimportant, the producer of oil, if the entire middle east would somehow or one way on the other be involved in this conflict with as a result of maybe even sanctions coming from the us on iran,

on other countries. this wouldn't include, he has a big impact on, on oil producing countries. therefore, would see all price is going up. if this is, this is caustic, was to escalate. we could really see all the prize is going above $100.00 per barrel very easily. yeah, and this region is also a key passage way for shipping what, what a disruption those roots means. the global economy are indeed always seated, especially this 3 of homeless, which is a very important one, not only for all transportation, but in general for, for transportation. so this would then have an impact again, especially on our price is adding to the upward pressure on all prices. and i think that is the bottom line here. so one is we, we don't know anything the that's also an all the other countries geopolitical tensions over the last couple of years have shown us. it is impossible to really

tell anyone what the direct impact of the explicit implant on growth will be. but what we do know is that there will be, especially when the, the entire region will be involved in this conflict. there wouldn't be a big impact on all prizes that wouldn't be of impact on um, at least the transportation. and that this idea that that oil prices could go back to 70 or $80.00 per barrel would be something off the pass. and then we then would have to pick your pad for another on price prices. how likely do you think such a scenario is in all honesty, i wouldn't dare currently making predictions of how likely such a scenario is. i think what, what is important is that we know now from with it what are the pin demick, the war and ukraine, and also these unexpected event, this kind of huge repercussions kind of

a huge impact on the global economy. i think it's also that we're now in this, in this era of self overlapping emergencies. also makes that uncertainty economic sentiment uh could could we could further. and um, so therefore i would not come up with a prediction how likely such a scenario is. but the last few years has really clearly taught us that it's always good to come up with scenarios. the bass case scenario is one in which the conflict will not further escalate. and we will not get the entire region being involved in this conflict. but clearly, one of the risk scenarios is one with a further escalation and also then as a consequence, much higher on the prices. and you can see the full interview with mr. projects. he on youtube, from east, by the,

as we approach desk. nice again. you had a clue, has no doubt as an end of life care, she looks up to people in hospice and support stay relative. it's a changing and meaningful task. that's just like the next d w. the climate change, i mean for a station in the rain forest continue, carbon dioxide emissions have risen again. the people of the world are we what impact

because the change doesn't happen the make up your own mind me the the the .