aspect soon, is there a way around it also on the show, wildly does a moving forward with a guy recommendation. what does that mean for us use of, as well as a witness, the computer capacity crunch soon, because we're running out of resources to try and, and operate all these other topics that i'm moving to the tech world, the tech talk, facebook x would you page and use them well soon, you might have to pay the business model seems to be the future of a social media platform. ex anessa already offer a paper verification service to help create just establish that presence. now mess up plans to charge use us for an ad free version of instagram and facebook and tip top wants to do the same. even snapshot office, a paid service, that includes additional tools and customizations and you to use us will be very familiar with the annoyingly pushy office for the ad free version youtube premiums

. so clearly that's a trend. social media companies want to make your pay, but how much exactly? let's look at the concrete numbers. instagram and facebook uses attached between 10 to 13 years a month for an ad free feed. take talk this testing a paid model for just under 5 years, a month snapshot plus some of them the same price range. meanwhile, you to a premium price. this roast is 13 years a month. and for the blue check on x, you have to spend a year as a month, so not to be bombarded with x. what going about your social media? life doesn't come cheap, but andre already paying with our data data harvesting. if it's rate, you'll have the product harvesting use of data is the typical social media business model. in exchange for that services company, schedule your personal data and provide you with personalized apps. but now world wide correct downs on this data business. for example,

by the european union might force them to change that game. if platforms aren't allowed to make money out of fuel data anymore, they come directly to you. they will make you pay for free versions of the platforms all for verification services. well, as long as i'm not forced to pay that isn't a problem, or is that data keeping use this to use us who pays just the best deal? paid verification like excess on met, has blue take cost with an algorithm post posts of use this for a pay end up on top of your feet and gets more visibility. that is probably a metric because it tends to push certain content. if people with money a most prominent and use this fits, this will create a pilot and balance. so we have a choice. 12 social media companies are doing the best to not for us to pay for that services. you might have noticed that your experiences as a free use that got worse on youtube. you can get up to 3 on skippable ads before

the actual video stops on instagram. every 3rd post, all start is now an ad and on the x scale post barely get reactions anymore. this is all calculated, making our experience as comfortable as possible, but always having a best life, just a few clicks. and here on the way, of course, if you don't like that, you can always just stop using the app. but can you really for many of us f like take talking to grandma x almost essential to connect with others. get to use our entertainment to stop using them altogether. it's definitely a difficult decision for many. i think social media companies got it. and now they are making us pay. and a lot of people are willing to, according to estimates around 1000000 uses, paying for ex premium snapshots. so that's, that's doing even better with a report of 5000000 subscribers. and you should set is parked a 10000000 premium usage. last yeah. we already giving them our data. would you

still also spend money on social media subscriptions, or don't you mind watching tons of apps? it is every way the high just social media fits your e mail assistance, all google search. now imagine, i don't know if this comes to a head, okay, that might be an exaggeration, but running out of refills of to train and operate our eyes. it's way more likely than a i taking over the world. a computing is happening in the data centers, essentially building said house computers. and so that's if we continue to scale up, development will tend to exceed the limits beneath us with 2 options. cool. some of them will make computing more efficient. well, the problems with either one of these solutions. oh and while we're assets, we may also run out of new data to train our guys. but more of that nature, why we conscious bill smart data centers?

simply put, we're about to run out of resources to operate them for reference one data center alone can consume as much as a tricity and water is 50000 homes in times of climate change and expanding resources. it's very unlikely if we can keep this kind of consumption up. so how. 7 making the computing inside the data centers more efficient than most lot so let's get to the technical top thing with me here. every piece of tech nowadays runs on micro chips and those just veterans system, the modern system on a chip, the computing power. so with me, so let me introduce you to more law. it's not a scientific law or anything. it's a to formulated by intel, correspond to baltimore fact in the seventy's he predicted that the number of transistors that would fit onto a chip that double about every 2 years. and until now his protection has held true,

leading to ever more powerful chips. however, experts think that this will reach a physical limit somewhere in the 2000 and twenty's business, because please don't, has a tech to make sure this is even smaller. also pull them down any more. aside from these physical constraints, we might also run into a problem with new training data for a eyes. a speeding itself is a small, widely being used as a growing concerned that it'll erase real innovation and new ideas. even though it seems that programs like check g, p t, or mid johnny are creative, very on artificial intelligence draws on existing data. so it's a, i just incorporate and basically every, when there's a chance that no new original data will be produced. essentially, a eyes would feed themselves, cancelling out everything that's new and groundbreaking. making creativity stagnate, if you think now, come on, that's never going to happen to my theory, right?

that's some expos estimate that by 2026, up to 90 percent of the content on the internet could be, i generate it. all right, and that's taken for you though. how to deal with all of this. the data centers could they build underground and already existing mines, okay? this with safe space and resources. also, natural water flows may help with pulling of them and reduce loss of consumption. however, this is all very dependent on the location and how to imagine on a global scale. as far more efficient micro chips, we need to rethink the tech itself. classic computer chips on not designed for a specific task. moving to a waste of energy as supp, optimal performance with chips pay, that's a i, computers can do much more with the same resources. and as for the a i, that's the piece itself. we need to take the holistic approach, trust and human inventiveness and creativity as well as benefiting from

a evidence chase. while doing that. i think we drastically need to rethink how we're approaching this technical revolution using up all of our resources for our short term growth. now and hindering developments in the future, it's the wrong way to go about it. in my opinion, what do you think? will the government take away chapter 13 or any of our favorite ai tools? probably not, but we'll see this and they are experts agree that a needs to be regulated. they just don't know how. and that's what's been discussed recently in the white house. and at the a safety summit in the u. k. one of the latest in a i regulations and what measures already in place. well, the latest tech manages and experts met in the u. k. they basically discussed how not to get overthrown by a i. this is something even a i develop a warning of critics phase this don't say talk, this just meant to distract from

a as real problems. so cool the side, the roof of the united states, things it's bad to teach. you need to weigh an executive order signs of president joe biden as to instrument universal, a span that's for example, the order recommend actions to protect consumer privacy and title ai driven discrimination. also, guidance on walter locke in a i generated content is named to plus and developers a now with choir to share the safe to results with the u. s. government. so the u. s. seems to be all set. however, to pos, meaningful regulations that needs to be a global framework for you and recent experiences. and a, i counseled to come up with global guidelines as a g 7, which is the form of a major industrial countries report. okay, agreed on the code of conduct. what developing a systems, what else was being done?

the u. s. in the process of passing the act, it's a to recognize a applications based on the risk. no risk applications such as spousal support e mail will likely face no regulation higher risk. a eyes like recruitment system will space serious regulation unacceptable. risk applications, select biometrics surveillance will be banned completely to in india. a resignation wasn't an issue for a long time, despite expos warnings. but after that, you set the tone with the act, the government had to change of mind. specific stand that's still need to be agreed upon in just tech community has some suggestions already. for example, the developers should be held accountable if the system costs hot. for now, the division is focused on the protection of the use of data, ethical aspects of

a i use that. however, having taken center stage, yet in china, the government seems to have realized that a has the potential to consolidate its power in china draft to regulate a i just mentioned the intelligence software should not produce content, but undermines the regime. the headboards in china seemed to be reluctant to say anything critical about the regime. and since 2019, the government has been using ai to monitor people and evaluate that behavior. single pull on the other hand is not looking to rec unit a on a notch scale. instead they want to false and innovate just text seeing as of now, single post government is relying on voluntary self recommendation by companies. when it comes to a i this click next, single port, a global hotspot for innovative development, but it could just as easily pace away from miss you. for this news, for us use us what only become apparent in the future. so global a,

i rules us fill up for debate. do you think a poses a threat to humanity, or are you mazda? what's the worst thing that could happen? type of person. that is no, that's all for me today. see you next time. the little guys, this is the 77 percent, the platform for these issues and share ideas. you know, on this channel we are not afraid to pass and then to talk to young people clearly have the solution, the future of the 77 percent every weekend on dw, actually we don't have

a choice. i think that we have little time list to save the planet. so we have to do what we can as fast as possible. we only have one generation left just 25 years to implement the greatest revolution since the doing of the industrial age of the replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy. around the world, without exception is a global energy to information really cost of the food as well. or is it a pull out to pump document trees? the renewables revolution dots november 25th dw, the.