is even to he wants to hear about the religion, you know, because they say like this thing is this taking us to a dock this with no end to the conflict inside. there is a month to pray for right now. next down technology show shift to ask whether we will see you and have to pay for social media programs such as instagram. stay tuned for that. i'll be back with more newsletter the actually we don't have a choice. we have little time list to save the planet. so we have to do what we can as fast as possible. we only have one generation left just 25 years to increment the greatest revolution since the doing of the industrial age . replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy around the

world without exception is a global energy to information on the forward as well. or is it for our coupon document free the renewables revenue jobs november 25th dw, the your favorites. social networks like instagram, take talk off, snap. chad must come with a price fix suit. is there a way around it also on the show? wildly. that's a moving forward with a guy recommendation. what does that mean for us use of, as well as a witness, the computer capacity crunch soon, because we're running out of resources to try and, and operate all these other topics that i'm moving to the tech world, the

tech talk, facebook x would you, i actually use them well, so you might have to pay the business model seems to be the future for social media platforms. x and meta already offer a paper verification service to help create just establish the presence. now mess up plastic charts. use us for an ad free version of instagram and facebook and 6 talk wants to do the same. even snapshot office a paid service that includes additional tools and customizations. can you tell them? use us will be very familiar with the annoyingly pushy office for the ad free version youtube premiums. so clearly that's a trend social media companies want to make your pay. but how much exactly? let's look at the concrete numbers. instagram and facebook uses attached between 10 to 13 years a month for an s 3 feet. take talk this testing a paid model for just on the 5 years a month snapshot plus some of them the same price range. meanwhile, you to a premium price. this roof to 13 years a month. and for the blue check on x,

you have to spend a year as a month. so not to be bombarded with ex was going about just social media. life doesn't come cheap, but andre already paying with our data data harvesting. if it's rate, you'll have the product harvesting use of data. it's a typical social media business model. in exchange for that services, companies get your personal data and provide you with a personalized app. but now world wide crackdowns on this data business, for example, by the european union, might force them to change that game. if that funds aren't allowed to make money out of fuel data anymore, they come directly to you. they won't make you pay for free versions of the platforms all for verification services. well, as long as i'm not forced to pay that isn't a problem or is that faith keeping use this to use us to pay get the best deal. paid verification like excess on met,

has blue take cost with an algorithm post post of use this for a pay end up on top of your feet and gets more visibility. that is probably a metric because it can push certain content. if people with money a most prominent and use this fits, this will create a pilot and balance. so we have a choice. 12 social media companies are doing the best to not for us to pay for that services. you might have noticed that your experiences as a free use that got worse on youtube. you can get up to 3 on skippable ads before the actual video stops on instagram. every 3rd post, all start is now an ad and on the x scale post barely get reactions anymore. this is all calculates as making our experience f, uncomfortable as possible, but always having a best life, just a few clicks. and here on the way, of course, if you don't like bass, you can always just stop using the app. can you really?

for many of us, athletic talking to grandma x are almost essential to connect with others. get to use our entertainment to stop using them altogether. it's definitely a difficult decision for many. i think social media companies got it, and now they are making us pay. and a lot of people are willing to, according to estimates around 1000000 users, paying for x premium snapshots. so that's us doing even better with a report of 5000000 subscribers. and usually if that is past $18000000.00 premium user to last year, we already giving them our data. would you still also spend money on social media subscriptions? or do you mind watching tons of apps? it is every way the high just social media fits your email assistant on google search. now imagine i don't know if this comes to a head. okay, that might be an exaggeration, but running out of resources to train and operate our eyes. it's way more likely

than a i taking over the world. a confusing is happening in the data centers, essentially building said health computers. and so that's if we continue to scale up, development will tend to exceed the limits beneath us with 2 options. if awesome, i'll make computing more efficient. well, the problems with either one of the solutions. oh and while we're at it, we may also run out of new data to train our guys. but the one that's nature. why we conscious bill smart data centers. simply put, we're about to run out of resources to operate them for reference one data center alone can consume as much as a tricity and water is $50000.00 homes in times of climate change and declining resources. it's very unlikely if we can keep this kind of consumption up. so how about making the computing inside the data centers more efficient then? more slow. so let's get to the technical part. stay with me here. every piece

of tech nowadays runs on micro chip. and those just veteran system and watch runs. this is on a chip in the computing power. so with me, so let me introduce you to more law. it's not a scientific law or anything. it's a toes told me later into correspond to god more back in the seventy's. he predicted that the number of transistors that would fit onto a chip that double about every 2 years. and until now his protection has held true, leading to ever more powerful chips. however, experts think that this will reach a physical limit somewhere in the 2000 and twenty's business, because please don't, has a tech to make sure that this is even smaller or to pull them down any more. aside from these physical constraints, we might also run into a problem with new training data for a eyes. a speeding itself is, is more widely being used as

a growing concerned that it will erase real innovation and new ideas. even though it seems that programs like check g, p t, or mid johnny are creative, very on. artificial intelligence draws on existing data. so if it's incorporated, basically, everyone does a chance that no new original data will be produced. essentially, a ice would feed themselves, canceling out everything that's new and groundbreaking, making creativity stacks, right. if you take now, come on, that's never going to happen to my theory, right? that's some expos estimate that by 2026, up to 90 percent of the content on the internet could be a i generate tips. all right, and that's taken for you though. how to deal with all of this data centers. could they build underground and already existing mines, okay. this with safe space and resources. also, natural water flows may help with pulling them and reduce water consumption.

however, this is all very dependent on the location and how to imagine on a global scale. as far more efficient micro chips, we need to rethink the tech itself. plaza computer chips on not designed for a specific task, needing to waste of energy as supp, optimal performance with chips pay, that's a i, computers can do much more with the same resources. and as for the a i, that's the piece itself. we need to take the honda stick approach, trust and human inventiveness and creativity as well as benefiting from a evidence chase. while doing that. i think we drastically need to rethink how we're approaching this technical revolution using up all of our resources for short term growth. now and hindering developments in the future, it's the wrong way to go about it. in my opinion, what do you think? will the government take away chapter 13 or any of our favorite ai tools?

probably not, but was the does n a i experts agree that a needs to be regulated? they just don't know how, and that's what's been discussed recently in the white house and at the a safety summit in the u. k. what is the latest in a i regulations and what measures already in place? well, the latest tech manages and expert, hey, mette, and the u. k. they've basically discussed how not to get overthrown by ai. this is something even a i develop a warning of critics say this don't say talk, this just meant to distract from a as real problems. so cool the side, the roof of the united states, things it's bad to teach. you need to weigh an executive order signed by president joe biden is to implement the universal a stand up. for example, the order recommend actions to protect consumer privacy and tackle driven discrimination. also, guidance on walter locke in

a i generated content is named to plus and developers and no required to share the safe to results with the u. s. government. so the u. s. has to be all set. however, to cost meaningful regulations. the needs to be a global framework for you and recent x ray, just and a, i counseled to come up with global guidelines as a g 7, which is the form of 7 major industrial countries report. okay, agreed on a code of conduct. what developing a systems, what else was being done? the u. s. in the process of passing the act, it's a to recognize a expectations based on the risk. no risk applications such as spam filter support e mail will actually face no regulation higher risk. a eyes like recruitment system will space serious regulation unacceptable. risk applications,

select biometrics surveillance will be banned completely in india. a resignation wasn't an issue for a long time, despite expos warnings. but after that, you set the tone with the act. the government had to change of mind. specific stand up still need to be agreed upon. in just tech community has some suggestions already. for example, the developers should be held accountable if the system costs hot. for now, the division is focused on the protection of use of data, ethical aspects of a i use that. however, having taken center stage, yet in china, the government seems to have realized that a has the potential to consolidate its power and china draft to regulate it. as mentioned, the intelligent software should not produce content to undermine the regime checkbox and china seem to be reluctant to say anything critical about the regime.

and since 2019, the government has been using ai to monitor people and evaluate that behavior. single pole, on the other hand, if not looking to rec unit i on a notch scale, instead they want to post an innovative tech seeing as of now, single post government is relying on voluntary self recommendation by companies when it comes to a i this click next single port, a global hotspot for innovative a development, but it could just as easily pace away from miss you. for this news for us use us, we're only become apparent in the future. so global a iris, us fill up for debate. do you think a guy poses a threat to humanity, or are you mazda? what's the worst thing that could happen? type of person. that is no. that's all for me today. see you next time, the

. the reality of the to sign a pilot catastrophe is the good news. a history science action should read, believe the prophecies when the next on the food chain, and yet they are in great danger. so no urgency for decades, they were almost exciting. now, large swamp areas are to be restored, left the return of the tag wires, begin in 45 minutes on the w

version. now understand can have a site like the light is presented. do you have any news on instagram from the no follow up the have you ever saw the world was coming to an it it was like if so you're not alone. for centuries, people have been trying to protect the next february, 1st 1524. 191910 december 21st 2012. the whole thing pencil did for tuesday.