that every year, you're exposed to over $1000000.00 tons of plastic. why is there another way officer ruled the environment is not responsible. make up your own mind dw, made for mines. the . your favorite social networks like instagram, take talk off, snapshots must come with a price fix soon. is there a way around it? also on the show, wildly this, i'm moving forward with a guy recommendation. what does that mean for us use this as well as a witness, the computer capacity crunch soon, because we're running out of resources to try and, and operate our a. i've these other topics that i'm moving to the tech world, the

tech talk. facebook's x would you page and use them well soon, you might have to pay the business model seems to be the future of a social media platform. x and meta already offer a paper verification service to help create establish that presence. now mess up plastic charts, use us for an s free version of instagram and facebook and 6 top wants to do the same. even snapshot office, a paid service, that includes additional tools and customizations. and you to use us will be very familiar with the annoyingly pushy office for the ad free version youtube premiums . so clearly that's a trend social media companies want to make your pay. but how much exactly? let's look at the concrete numbers. instagram and facebook uses attached between 10 to 13 years a month for an s 3 feet. take talk this testing a paid model for just under 5 years, a month snapshot plus some of them the same price range. meanwhile, you to a premium price. this roast is 13 years a month, and for the blue check on x,

you have to spend a year as a month, so not to be bombarded with x. what going about just social media life doesn't come cheap, but andre already paying with our data data harvesting. if it's rate, you'll have the product harvesting use of data is the typical social media business as models in exchange for that services. calling to schedule your personal dates out and provide you with a personalized app. but now, worldwide, correct jones on this data business, for example, by the european union, might force them to change that game. if platforms aren't allowed to make money out of fuel data anymore, they come directly to you. they will make you pay for free versions of the platforms all for verification services. well, as long as i'm not forced to pay that, is it a problem? or is that faith keeping use this to use us who pays get the best deal?

paid verification like excess on mess has blue take calls with an algorithm post post of use. this will a pay end up on top of your feet and gets more visibility. that is problem metrics because it can push certain content. if people with money a most prominent and use this fits, this will create a power and balance. so we have a choice. 12 social media companies are doing the best to not for us to pay for that services. you might have noticed that your ad experiences as a free use that got worse on youtube. you can get up to 3 on skippable ads before the actual video starts. on instagram, every 3rd post post start is now an ad. and on ex, you'll post barely get reactions anymore. this is all calculate is making our experience as comfortable as possible, but always having a best life. just a few clicks. and here of the way of quotes, if you don't like that, you can always just stop using the app. but can you really for many of us apps like

take talking to grandma x almost essential to connect with others. get to use our entertainment to stop using them altogether. it's definitely a difficult decision for many. i think social media companies got it. and now they are making us pay. and a lot of people are willing to, according to estimates around 1000000 users, paying for ex premium and upset. so that's, that's doing even better with the report. 5000000 subscribers. and you should set as past 18000000 premium usage. last year. we already giving them our data. would you still also spend money on social media subscriptions? oh, don't you mind watching tons of apps is every way behind your social media feed, your email assistant on google search. now imagine, i don't know if this comes to a halt. okay, that might be an exaggeration, but running out of 3 cause us to train and operate our eyes. it's way more likely

than a i taking over the world. a confusing is happening in the data centers, essentially building said house computers. and so that's if we continue to scale up, development will tend to exceed the limits beneath us with 2 options from awesome. i'll make computing more efficient. well, the problems with either one of these solutions. oh and while we're assets, we may also run out of new data to train our guys. but that's the nature of why we conscious bill smart data centers. simply put, we're about to run out of resources to operate them for reference one data center alone can consume as much as a tricity and water is $50000.00 homes in times of climate change and declining resources. it's very unlikely if we can keep this kind of consumption up. so how about making the computing inside the data centers more efficient then?

more slow. so let's get to the technical part. thing with me here. every piece of tech nowadays runs on micro chip. and those just veterans system, the modern system on a chip in the computing power. so with me, so let me introduce you to more law. it's not a scientific law or anything. it's a to formulation into cause found a golf more back in the seventy's. he predicted that the number of transistors that would fit onto a chip that double about every 2 years. and until now his protection has held true, leading to em all powerful chips. however, experts think that this will reach a physical limit somewhere in the 2000 and twenty's. this is because we don't have the tech to make transistors even smaller, also pull them down any more. aside from these physical constraints, we might also run into a problem with new training data for you guys. a, as the thing itself is, is more widely being used as

a growing concerned that it will erase real innovation and new ideas. even though it seems that programs like check g, p t, or mid johnny are creative, very on. artificial intelligence draws on existing data. so it's a, i just incorporated basically, everyone does a chance that no new original data will be produced. essentially, a ice would feed themselves, canceling out everything that's new and groundbreaking, making creativity stagnate, if you think now, come on, that's never going to happen to my theory, right? that's some expos estimate that by 2026, up to 90 percent of the content on the internet could be i generate it. all right, that's taken for you though. how to deal with all of this data centers, could they build underground and already existing mines? okay. this what safe space and resources also, natural water flows may help with pulling them and reduce loss of consumption.

however, this is all very dependent on the location and how to imagine on a global scale. as far more efficient micro chips, we need to rethink the tech itself. classic computer chips on not designed for a specific task. moving to a waste of energy and supp optimal performance with chips pay that's a i, computers can do much more with the same resources. and that's why the i, that's beef itself, we need to take the honda stick approach, trust and human inventiveness and creativity as well as benefiting from a evidence chase. while doing that, i think we drastically need to rethink how we're approaching this technical revolution using up all of our resources for our short term growth now and hindering developments in the future. it's the wrong way to go about it. in my opinion, what do you think? well, the government take away chapter 16 for any of our favorite ai tools,

probably not. but we'll see this and they are experts agree that a needs to be regulated. they just don't know how. and that's what's been discussed recently in the white house and as a safety summit in the u. k. what is the latest in a i regulations and what measures already in place? well, lead us tech manages and experts met and the u. k. they've basically discussed how not to get overthrown by ai. this is something even a, i develop a warning of critics say this don't say talk, this just meant to distract from a as real problems. so cool the site, the roof of the united states, things it's bad to teach and need to weigh an executive order assigned the president. joe biden is to implement the universal a standards for example, the order recommend actions to protect consumer privacy and tackle driven

discrimination. also guidance on walter locke and a i generated content, this name to plus and developers, and now with quiet to share the safe to results with the u. s. government. so the u . s. seems to be all set. however, to cost meaningful regulations. the needs to be a global framework for you and recent experiences in a i counseled to come up with global guidelines as a g 7, which is the form of a major industrial countries reports okay, agreed on the code of conduct. what developing a systems, what else was being done? the u. s. in the process of passing the act, it's a to regulate expectations based on the risk. no risk applications such as spam filter support e mail will actually face no regulation higher risk. a eyes like recruitment systems, will space serious regulation unacceptable. risk applications like biometrics

surveillance will be banned completely. as in india, a resignation wasn't an issue for a long time despite expos warnings. but also that you set the tone with the act, the government had to change of mind. specific stand up still need to be agreed upon in just tech community has some suggestions already. for example, the developers should be held accountable if the systems cause comp for now, the division is focused on the protection of the use of the data. ethical aspects of a i use that. however, having taken center stage, yet in china, the government seems to have realized that a has the potential to consolidate its power and china draft to recognize it. as mentioned, the intelligent software should not produce contents that undermine the regime. the headboards in china seemed to be reluctant to say anything critical about the

regime. and since 2009 cheese, the government has been using ai to monitor people and evaluate that behavior. single pull on the other hand is not looking to rec unit a on a notch scale. instead, they want to post an innovative tech seeing as of now, single post government is relying on voluntary self recommendation by companies when it comes to a i this click next, single port, a global hotspot for innovative development, but it could just as easily pace away from miss you, for this news for us use us what i want to become apparent in the future. so, global a, i rules us fill up for debate. do you think a poses a threat to humanity, or are you mazda? what's the worst thing that could happen? type of person. that is no, that's all for me today. so your next time, the

one of mankind's oldest ambitions to be within reach. what is it really is possible to reverse the researchers and scientists all over the world for you know, race against time. they are peers and rivals with one daring goals to help smart nature, the more likes watching it on youtube, dw documentary manuals, and do you belong to the 77 percent to come to i don't and 65 full was while those top 5 years through the right, one, the wants to think we are here to help you make up your mind. we are here on please

find your mind. so all of the topics, i'm much it to you from couple fixed a new culture. and in 15 minutes, that's part of our community life on the research is now on the right hand side is fighting against racism with the health that make up and mascara in the into control. grand beauty, salmone thing cause us and i think our society desperately needs people coming into contact with each other. and that's something that happens very quickly. and the beauty salon smell, but can say shows and many to us really tear down battery is and how to overcome practice

the those who work in the grand beauty salon in leipzig, all familiar with different preferences and beauty standards between cultures. the international team consist nearly exclusively of people with a refugee or migrant background model style, professionally trained in that croft and some self tones. but every client seems to appreciate then know how on the different tier than in other beauty salons. i've only been once before to a beauty salon in germany, and then i went because of a friend of mine. many of the clients of migrants who rarely or never go to a beauties town in germany. they feel uncomfortable and sometimes wearing a headscarf makes a visit to a conventional.