israel's military says the tuesday solve the fiercest finding yet since the war against a must begin in october, resistance reported across all of garza. and these should be the refugee camp of the north and in the city of hon. you're just in the south. there is no way to know how many civilians are now caught in the crossfire. israel has warned gardens to move further south to what are being called safe zones, but the un says that is impossible. i'm pretty gulf and berlin. this is the day. the situation is the worst by the, by the hour. so typically in the chart context of the circle sykes ons, no. so as you say, i'm not rational fan of possible. so what's the village should do to stay safe is listen to the instructions are coming into like bowling going on

all around me from this area of his own to this other is going to get like the farms. and i think the bodies of where they're aware of these callous, i think it's cold also coming up, china is the world's worst pollute or will be genes, investments in renewable energy, help it, and the rest of the world clean up their act. we're still unfortunately heavy data to fossil fuel. we actually burn. yeah. then now half off the global coke song, sion every year, the a do our viewers watching on cbs in the united states and to all of you around the world. welcome. we begin the day with the fiercest finding yet in gauze. and now that is how these really military described on tuesday, it's ground offensive, aimed at destroying the terra group. i'm off. it comes as is real, is expanding its campaign across the entire territory. forces have reportedly

surrounded southern guns is largest city fund, eunice. israel's military says it warrant in advance, hundreds of thousands of civilians to evacuate hon units and to head towards the mediterranean coast or further south towards the border with egypt. but the un says there is no safe place left in garza one member of the w h o saying for civilians. this is the darkest, all running out of places to keep their family safe palestinians more than their loved ones. after striking the vicinity of a school in con eunice, that this is his blood, may he rest in peace? thousands of bodies arrive at the hospital. many carried there by regular people. but i'm on, i la my cousin called me and said my sister was killed. you said the body was on the floor in the school yard. we have to carry the body, our selves. we saw for remains of people blood and submit to the many thousands and

con eunice have already been displaced after evacuating their homes in the north. some more than once. now, israel's military has released footage. it says shows troops pushing deeper south and people and con eunice have been built in new evacuation order. israel's using a numbered block system to issue it's evacuation orders. those are ready in the strip south are being asked to relocate even further south of asia. we are preparing ourselves to leave the hon. eunice area and goes towards rafa. you know, we've been here for about 50 days now or in the end, we're just looking for safety. let them use it. and the many fear that even the so called safe zones, they are asked to evacuate,

to will not be spared the bombardment. to ensure a monster never operates in gaza again. now that is one of the goals announced by israel with the declared war on a mazda almost 2 months ago when now the head of israel's domestic intelligence service says one of its goals is to eliminate, i'm us leaders, anywhere and everywhere around the world, fighting raging and southern gaza. israel has expanded its campaign against a mosque while operations continue with the north. even after is reclaimed nearly a month ago that homicide loss control their. so that's what is the claim of for the truce in northern guys, are we dismantled to him? asked brigade hopkins did not completely yet. so i'm, we're still working inside to secure our accomplishments. medina had to strike more battalion. did you go about, do the israel says it has killed thousands of him off fighters, but how most was estimated to have about 30000 fighters before the war started. and

many of them are still around. israel also says it is destroyed hundreds of him, of tunnels, as seen in this video released by the id. yes, but how mazda does have 16 years and gaza to build an extensive network that runs the entire length of the territory, which will make it extremely difficult to eliminate them. all the boxes is real, has targeted many him, us commanders is really newspaper you'd. you'd published images of a deck of playing cards, showing top leaders, including if use in well and military hed bahama dev distributed amongst as rarely soldiers. but the senior leadership is thought to still be alive and commanding the group from con eunice. that's also where the most hostages are believed to be kept . as human shields have also also has officials far beyond kaiser in the west bank and, and lebanon, where they are increasingly aligned with others. or how does movements the

political leadership lives and guitar, and their fundraising officials and turkey as well of the campaign and gaza. it has also cost and estimated $15000.00 palestinians their lives so far. worldwide support for the palestinian cause has spread far beyond the region. the growing number of civilian casualties and the dire humanitarian crisis will very likely play into a mazda is hands making the groups resurgence even more likely, possibly dragging the war out for years. beyond all these challenges, it's far from clear what is real would do if it did defeat how boss is real, hasn't presented a plan for how it or anyone else would run guys. so israel trying to reach mission, accomplished to talk about that i'm doing now by getting started there. he's a senior fellow with the german institute for international and security affairs. you know, it's good to see you again. do you think fully eliminating, come off with military means? is that realistic? is it possible?

but i think it is possible to eliminate the homos and that means of catching or killing most of the leadership in the gaza strip and shooting or catching most of the fighters from us in the gaza strip. fully eliminating it to the extent that it cons. type is really is once the war is over. i think that's impossible, simply because from us is not only the militant organization awesome 20 to 30000 fighters. it is also a social movement. no, with a mazda following the gaza strip. that would be the problem. the day this war stops, if, even if you take out all of the fighters. what about people who are sympathizers with most people who may not be willing to pick up a gun, but who would not be sad to see others pick up a gun? i mean, is there, is there any way to quantify those people in those mindsets,

the way it has been watch the widespread support for how monitoring the gaza strip in recent years? most likely, the number of supporters is between 20 and 30 percent of the population. that means somewhere between 40600000 persons. and the problem, the problem is even that you eliminate most of the, the, the last minute and organization. the organization will be able to recruit and knowledge support base in the years to come. so what is needed is a fighting force that is able to control the situation in the gaza strip for months and years to come. and of course, a politic political solution in order to win at least parts of this social base over. and as it seems, these rarely government has no to what might happen to the gaza strip off to the

war against pharmacies while the french president, emanuel metro and says that the complete elimination of the palestinian terrorist group from us would take a decade. what kind of timeframe do you think we are looking at here? i mean, are we talking about decades instead of years or months? said, no, no, i think the french president set this for political reasons. it is of course, possible to eliminate the organization, but it's impossible to eliminate all of the hamas fighters to eliminate the organization. will take not a couple of weeks perhaps a couple of months. but then the big problem, as i already said, is how to win the piece. uh and israel, obviously it doesn't seem to have any clue what might happen afterwards. as it seems israel is ready to re occupied the gaza strip. but, but that's,

we mean that remaining how most fighters in new recruits will fight these rallies out of the guys and up around it wouldn't be very hard to control the situation in the gaza strip against the will of the population that you know, if we compare the situation to other countries in the region or to attend to other conflicts has such a massive military campaign, including the effect that it has on civilians ever led to less extremism, less radicalization with some of these, some similar campaigns where a successful, for example, against uh, the lennox stage organization in masula in 2017 or in rock to into the 2009. 19 the destruction. indeed in both of the cities was comparable to what is happening right now in jobs up. i think one of the main

differences was that ices or i asked was not a social movement. it was a militant organization of some 203040000 fighters. and that was it. how much is a social movement with my support in the gaza strip, and that is the problem in the long run. that's not the problem for the coming months, minutes a israel might, might clearly win this war against him us. but it's, it will be very hard to win the piece off the words. it won't be any. yeah, that's what when the piece and when the hearts and minds of a lot of people, you know, started back from the germany institute for international and security affairs either as always, we appreciate your time and your analysis. thank. the pentagon has quietly ramped up a weapons shipments headed for israel, and i use the word quietly because there are some transparency concerns with the by

the white house under pressure to disclose to congress the extent of its weapons deliveries at offense and not hillary rocket system tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, how they cop does unmanned aerial systems. that is just some of the us as military assistance provided to ukraine. a detailed list of weapons is released with every new military aid package for keith. why is washington not doing the same with weapons for israel? we are providing assistance to israel through very different mechanisms and how we provide assistance to ukraine and the funding mechanisms and how we're supplying aid. it's, it's 2 different countries to different wars and, and again, you know, 2 different areas of responsibilities. the bottom administration faces the pressure to disclose the extent of you as long as and is with at least 2 congress in the national security funding requested to congress. the wide tells included an exemption for h. 2 israel citing the countries urgent need the request include c o for the to

waive congressional notification of requirements. something washington never requested for ukraine. this means the israeli government would be able to purchase billions and military articles and services incomplete. see chris, israel is the world's largest camille, active recipient of us age and support for israel security has been a cornerstone of american foreign policy. but with israel's intense funding of the gaza strip scrutiny on the role that us is playing is also increasing. is absolutely critical that congress is able to, to review, to have transparency on all of the weapons that are going so that it can determined as an appropriate funds to tax care funds. frankly, to continue to buy these weapons that they're used for, you know, the, the urgent defense needs. but that are not used in ways that contribution us laws, policies, uh, or international law on waging or is like use ations crow. this, the us government is not complying. with its conventional armstrong policy,

some democrats are talking of conditioning, future us military aid to israel. if that happens, the pressure on president biden, to take a more critical look at america's military support for israel will only increase rel, i'm joined now by bradley bowman. he's the military in defense analyst and senior director of the center on military and political power at the foundation for defense of democracies. the joys be from washington writers get to see you again. arms to ukraine are publicly declared military assistance to israel is shrouded in secrecy. is that a correct description? and if it is why or uh, thanks for that to join you. i wouldn't say it that way. honestly, i wouldn't say that there has been radical transparency in terms of us security assistance to ukraine. for example, we know that the, the buy ministration is committed about $44000000000.00 and security assistance to

ukraine since the february 24th 2022 invasion. we know we have a long list of weapons in many cases. we know how many weapons i would say that's not really the norm, and there are lots of reasons for that. one reason might be, particularly over time, we've seen a minority of the republican caucus in the house of representatives, and kinda dragging their feet in, in beginning to oppose support for ukraine. and so the, the, by the ministration increasingly as time is going on as wanted to, to make the case on how this is helping us defense industrial base as a big causing those statistics helps reinforce that effort to try to build support with israel. um, you know, when the pedagogy has asked about this in the recently as november 28th, a pentagon reporter asked for either general pat, right. or for essentially the version of the question you just asked me general, right? or he's cited that you are there what some complexities involved with israel that

are not with you printing cited for military sales, for military financing, preexisting sales, the us weapons stockpile that's already in israel. and, and the fact that some weapons are coming from us inventories, your viewers are paying attention to will say, well, a lot of that's true of ukraine as well. and that's true, but some is not like, for example, the preexisting stock piles of us weapons. a skeptic would push back on was a writer and said, well, you know, we're, we're almost 2 months into this with as real. you know, how hard is it? how long do it to take? and that pushes me back and maybe that there are some political considerations here . yeah. politics here because the white house has been asked about this in the white house. has argued that transparency full transparency would in peril. israel's operational security. and that same risk does not appear to apply to ukraine. 3 i guess for a layman watching this, the question would be, well, why would transparency also be a bigger a big risk for ukraine?

why is it a bigger risk for israel, or yeah, you know, the, the, the battlefield situations are the strategic situations of ukraine and israel are different obviously. i mean, a, ron is undertaking a multi year effort to establish a ring of fire around israel. one of the leading concerns right now is that while israel's busy trying to decimate the designated tariffs, organizational moss and gaza, that committed the atrocities of october 7th, at any moment, you could have a roster, approx 11 on has the law launch a major from the north so when you have a situation like that, do you really want to be telling your adversaries in the world exactly how many small diameter bombs have been sent to israel, for example, or joint direct attack munition? so i think there is a legitimate operational argument for maybe a different level of disclosure when it comes to enroll in ukraine. oh yeah. and so i wanted to push back to what i just said, well, you know, your credit is not exactly a walk in the park either there, there's concerns there. but given the geography of ukraine,

did you guys did the realities of the battlefield? in the 2 places, i think there is some argument for maybe a little less disclosure when it comes to security assistance for as well. let me ask you to, since you're in washington, and i wanted to just press a little bit more about the, the, the, the political dimensions of this. you know, that there are louder calls than we've seen ever before in the united states. and on capitol hill for there to be a ceasefire between is real and how much it is. they also have been accusations that the mill, it is really military, has been doing things that people perhaps do not want to have committed in their name. if that is the case, do you think there's a risk in washington with just an election just a year way that if you had been a supporter of sending weapons to israel, that can become political baggage a weight against you on election day. do you see that being discussed or, or do you see that trade? oh, i would were yeah, i would be i would respectfully press back on the promise

a little bit. it's undoubtedly true of the someone on the far left have called for the white house to curtail or condition security assess the israel and apply pressure and probably hold combat operations and gaza. thus far. the administration has in mind you admirably resist the doing so. you know, you see, you see by the vice president speech a day or 2 ago, you saw a secretary also speech at their, at the ranking form in california where they are a little bit more. they applied a little bit more public pressure, but here's the thing that i think everyone needs to know and in my opinion, wherever they are in the political spectrum. but, you know, if you're concerned about going after the terrorists who committed the worst slaughter of use a single day slot, our views since the whole cost, then you want israel, they have the means to precisely killed those chairs. the people that did that. so they can't do it again while minimizing sewing casualties. and if you cut off the us profusion of precision guided munitions,

you're going to do exactly the opposite. you're going to make it harder for them to kill these tears, and you're going to, despite the ongoing, best efforts of israel to minimize civilian casualties are going to have more civilian deaths. and so, and by the way, you're probably going to extend the war and thereby increased civilian suffering. so this really is someone who digs into these issues. that really is an instance where i think people with a particular agend are pushing for something, going directly undermine their primary goals. right. but it's always good to talk with you to get your insights tonight as always. thank you. thank you. there is no place global climate conference or fossil executives or fossil fuel lobbyist, just like there's no police fire fighting convention in order for this cause to deliver meaningful action that people on the planet are urgently owed. it needs to deliver as fast, fair for ever fossil fuel spaced out, not face down. that does not pay the way for further fossil fuel use by using

additive like a baited or unabated to those were climate activists. they are criticizing the presence of fossil fuel lobbyist, climate talks taking place now in due by environmental n g o's and say more than 2000 delegates linked to fossil fuel companies, i've been accredited for this year is un conference. that's a record number. i could just say that's more than 4 times the number of lobby is granted access to last year's talk and it comes as carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels are set to hit a record high this year. the global carbon budget report estimates the global c o 2 emissions from fossil fuels will reach 36800000000 metric tons this year. that's more than one percent higher. the last year china is currently the world's biggest emitter of greenhouse gas, is at the same time. aging is also investing heavily in renewable energy, a gray blankets, a small here in china is capital beijing notes

a rare occurrence. while equity has improved, it's still a big problem. a major course is burning coal. we're still unfortunately heavy decade to fossil fuel. we actually firmware then now half off the global coke song, sion every year in china is the world's biggest pollution. responsible for almost a 3rd of all carbon dioxide emission. and it's continuing to run pump. it's use of fossil fuels in 2020 to the nation, permitted 6 times more coal projects than the rest of the world combined. according to one report. one reason is climate change, the country is being heavily impacted by global warming and to release his heat waves leading to more demand for air conditioning. another reason is industry. china is a global leader in both steel and cement production sectors with high energy needs

. replacing coal is not easy, particularly when he doesn't have a, a viable alternative. if a high quality heat is not impossible, but it's very difficult to achieve that in a very large electricity system, purely with renewables. but china is leading in clean energy to china's investment and renewable energy. in 2022. the wolf dropped the nations more than $270000000000.00 compared with other big investors, like the european union, with $55900000000.00. i mean, lighting states with $49500000000.00. china produced is 80 percent of oil solar panels. and there's also a huge manufacturer of wind turbines, electric vehicles, and bus trees. driving its own move towards clean energy and making it cheaper for other countries to also move forward. which are,

those actors are primarily boost data over the last decade or so on by china is strong industrial policies and it includes, um, you know, china is ability to lock uh, be with the supply chains off those key technologies in a very short period of time. it also has a lot to do face just the sheer size of our domestic market. china is set to hitch its highest c o 2 emission levels by 2025 at the latest off to which its emissions will start to draw, helped by huge investments and renewable energy. but unless it's a bon bons, it's called a diction. seems like these are unlikely to disappear any time soon. and finally, before we go, we want to leave you with images of a norwegian man doing something that we can only record being that you don't try yourself. can store it's claims that he has broken

a record by which this jumping off the cliff from a height of 40 meters and landing in an icy fjord face. first, this activity is called the depth of jumping, which means taking the di billy 1st with outstretched arms, but no one really wants to die here, not in a few words. so just before hitting the water divers, go into a well, a fetal like cannibal position. they survive with lots of splash of the day continues the line you find is on x, also known as twitter and youtube. that need to be news. you can probably be afraid of tv. and remember, whatever happens between now and then tomorrow is another day, we'll see you then in the

kenyan content motor races versus big tech, the ones that i need that's amazing. the content that some used looking few used to um, totally jump on me to the 42 with the newly founded union, they'll taking up the fight for more rugs and more respect in the industry. the 77 percent next on

d w. what role do women complain? indian film today? body would 5 use of to being rocked by me to serious allegations of sexual abuse. have shaken the film industry. what has changed since then? actresses and female office tell the story. to us. in 60 minutes on the w is the taste. we have a problem. it was in the us middle class income has fairly risen in the last 20 to 30 years at the same time that

keeps rising done. no, but disparity leads to higher unemployment and slows down. the economy was a card. you've reached the 300 trillion that, that trump stuff, december 9th, on dw. hello, and welcome to another edition of the 77 percent. the show that gives voice to africa's youth. i'm your host michael team, across africa that information communication technology o i c t sector is expressing must've got the id, say, thought is expected to generate about 24000000000 dollars in revenue by the end of this year. all of this good means opportunities for you and today i want us to talk about this opportunities and some challenges

so.