to, to support the growth of the total population, the number of turtles has been decreasing because of loss of habitat and the legal trade internal x. all right, you are up to date. don't forget there's plenty more use and information on our website, the www dot. com. and also you can follow us on our social media accounts for me, the team here take care the issues with a lot say what the you print with like a stepping point. you know, time what you into that warranty wants to be. finish your studies. now you have

a certificate from the train. you can just go back or somewhere else. currently, more people than ever on the move. in such a base in life categories, something that is come in very, very sense. and you come, we learn more about or know when a story info, migraines, the, there's something about birthday is it, this is maybe the crack of just looking at one, almost feels safe. if only forgetting about their impact with easy as the lights, but producing food and it's nearly a 3rd of all greenhouse gases and all food, these parties are the worst offenders. so i'm going to do things differently. we're going to be talking about rotation like grazing rotational, raising rotational, raising rotational engraving and produce b. so it's actually good to be in by and even carbon neutral. because these same house can also improve the soil and helps walk c o 2 in the ground. other state has

completely pushed either way deep as a massive problem and to slow climate change, we have to fix it. is the only solution to orbit or is there another way to eat peace without the people have been domestic heating, animals for 10000 years was became dogs wild goats and she pertains an or ox became cattle. today there farmed around the world with the u. s. and brazil, producing the most, it's a $400000000000.00 industry, even if you're like me and eat no meat at all. i'm the guy, just harrier. beef production still affects you because it's responsible for $4300000000.00 metric tons of c o 2 every year. that's almost as much as the entire united states and fixing this isn't as simple as everyone going. beacon is to reality, right? and we need to recognize cobo, ronko is a plant scientist,

and i p. c. c officer from colombia, focusing on making live stock more sustainable. their 1st one is found very little countries where people may choose what they eat. there are, at least i know that reality a, for the open country where people are struggling for nutrients animal protein to make a huge difference. and beating up our beef production can help. but what's the best way? good for very simply speaking, there are 2 ways of raising cattle. one is grass fed farms like this one in northern germany, run by high colquitt for dental with you? because more, i guess what i can discuss is only have to take some vital use, easy then to have enough cost. that's really fixed, advanced it to before that, i mean is as quickly it noise. this is a small operation right now. there are 50 animals here. eat in the spring. that's the phone. it doesn't cut it all season. yadi here is uh, it's fine. i've got dividends. the most of i do isn't. yeah. on the highest and so called spa, this could be some of the fact that i would like you to flash the room around

a $160.00 high chairs and have a warm bar and for the winter raising cattle. look similar to this and many places in the world. and then there are few gods that can help thousands or tens of thousands of animals. they live in a confined area and eat mostly grain instead of grass as to which has better grasp it or feed lot is actually not that simple. that's compare sustainability using these categories will start with but goes in food progress had cattle doesn't travel far because the, the combination of grass and clover which contains more protein during the summer. this is all harvested and turned into that for them to eat over the winter. so grass fed beef avoids the emissions and chemical run off from producing grain. it also wins on the water grasp and cattle drink from lakes or ground. why not? so for a few thoughts, the cows drink water and soda, the crops going to their feet. there is a downside to grass, the cows update more than 10 green and what goes in also comes out wherever cows

are, all these cows are basically constantly burping and farting which generates a lot of methane. essentially, the bigger they are, the more methane they make. methane is indivisible, so best detected by satellite. it's way more potent than c o 2 on a diet of grass, animals go slower, so expel more methane than greenfield caps surprised when for the feed lots there. that would also comes out as manure in your, in lots of it, in addition to methane, it releases nitrous oxide and other potent greenhouse gas in the summer. the minority composes in the field and pollution levels are low during winter. the minorities handled similarly to a feed lot, like also technical there. it all comes out here and then it's shuttled over there where it's eventually turn into liquid and sprayed on fields. except on a feedlot manure is stored in large pools, releasing more methane and solid storage. and the more that there is,

and the longer it's stored, the more it releases. another big difference is what it contains. on feed lots antibiotics we used to keep animals healthy in stimulate growth. they end up and those are newer pools and can leak into our water supply. antibiotic resistance partially fueled by me, production kills around a 1000000 people every year. one big downside to grafted farms is a fair way less efficient at producing meet these cows or want to be 2 or 2 and a half, which is a rounding year longer than conventional operations. that means only 10 of them are cited every year. cows grow faster on feed lots, which makes it cheaper. meet you see mostly in by the very rich. so more efficient farming has made it more widely available. but for grasp it, you have to pay a premium. the costs of this meat is really high at $22.00 euro per kilo. for

comparison, the supermarket need is 10 the difference in price does speak to a difference in quality. don't the stuff to you long as i fixed the size as long as that 100 bucks the manufacturing homes assignment deposit the most good thursday. fine, and i'm tired of that. i'm in the extra i'm extension institute. i'm the time because i won't open ever sure. back except to get and response is quotes the slicing unless you quit seeing if i should encourage it. quality is also tied animal welfare as stressed animals make for worse, meet and on the lot. stressors are everywhere. eating green can cause ulcers and cattle, and they are often sick from the close quarters. transport and cattle is also stressful. so people have to mit, less methane and meet is significantly cheaper. the grazing systems are better quality in animals, use less water and pollute less. so far they're winning on sustainability when viewed from a global scale though, it's a different story. so a lot of discussions focus on the farm level for the food food system is massive

its global janet wrong and asked and is an expert in calculating and evaluating greenhouse gas emissions to kind of just focus on practices that might improve things at the bottom. that we'll look what is the system the end of the system level land use is the most important consideration even including land to grow green b lots, use land more efficiently than grading systems according to german organic wise, that can only be about one full grown cow per tech tear of land for scale. one hacked here is roughly 2 american football fields that some lot of lands which were running out globally. we're using 2 thirds of our land to be as lifestyle as more people eat meat. more land is the for us to, to use for past year. we're losing $3000000.00 hectares per year. this way, it's a huge problem, especially in the amazon reinforce 40 percent of tropical forest loss occurs and present one of the world's largest beef producers production. there is also extremely inefficient and that's something that needs to change. one of the most

important things we do is to increase the productivity of live stock. and there's a huge company on patient opportunity to do that because the productivity levels across the globe can vary by a 100 for one of the most hyped ways to increase productivity is rotational grazing . it's a practice of intensively grazing an area and then moving the animals to let it recover. it's been used by shepherds around the world for centers and became popular in the 1950s in the us as a response to the greeting. pastor and climate change is putting it in the spotlight again, live stuff to address climate change and as advocate this ted talk has been viewed over 8000000 times. your 3 key aspect of this technique. a more cattle, dividing a passers and planning agrees invitation. instead of one cow per hector, think for their intensive grazing of a smaller area, stimulates plants to go faster and put down deeper routes when you plot. ready or

a grating, but carefully you are able to extract the best nutrients pulled their forages, and therefore you all. ready to read, you do read relative methane emissions it without quite a bit of faith and therefore use more meaningful or more beef. rotational grazing is more efficient without the environmental impacts of the feed lot. field studies like this one also shown that it improves so quality and request is carbon via the cat grass grow, sucking up c o 2, which is eaten by the animals as they trembled in manure, the carbon is stored under graft. the bone skin that by using it, they're producing carbon neutral be so these calculations don't really add up method. nitrous oxide are way more potent than c o 2. so this well would have to continuously store way more carbon to make up for the emissions from the animals. and that's just not how slow it works. the amount of carbon, though defined in storage source, it limits at some point you will bridge. i've talked to the agent, so those are also wildly different around the world to accomplish very complex when

you implement in practice to increase your company, you're at work with the microphone vista and working perfectly. rotational grazing still uses a lot of land. studies have found around twice as much as feedback. it's not a silver bullet. the trouble is there is some familiar faces painting. it is one. this study was funded by general mills. if grazing is carbon neutral, there's no reason for them to cut down on the production. this movie about the benefits of rotational grazing was funded partially by show, which uses the practice to offset fossil fuel emissions. but swell is not unless carbon sinks so all setting oil doesn't make sense. and because rotational grazing uses more precious land, converting cross fields into a pastor doesn't add up either, especially in places that produce massive amounts of meat. where it does make sense as places where people struggle to get enough protein or places with highly inefficient breathing systems. yes, we absolutely need to use things practices in places like columbia and countries in africa where these rotational partners actually restore. so helping increase

productivity, that makes a huge lot of sense. another country where it makes a huge amount of sense is presented as the world's 2nd largest exporter of me. improving efficiency will have a massive impact. rotational grazing could decrease deforestation and restore degraded areas. so if we continue to eat meat pie that's also have their place, but they need fixing and they can be more sustainable without making meet super expensive restrictions on the number of animals and requirements for them to have time outside improves animal welfare feed additives like algae can reduce methane emissions from cattle, nor can be treated to release less greenhouse gases, and not letting it sit for long periods of time can limit its impact in law's limiting antibiotic use and few thoughts reduce antibiotic resistance. no matter what though, this needs to go hand in hand with reduce consumption in some places. if we actually the limited beef consumption to about one and a half times the goose a week, we could do will still continue to enjoy. so we can eat beef without running the

planet, sort of people in places like the u. s. and e, you need to eat lots of it. that's the most effective way for them to lower their carbon footprint. and whether through better grazing or feed lots, we can make the production more sustainable by improving efficiency. but even so, producing beef is not good for the environment. so ensuring we change the current system is absolutely key to a future level planet. so what do you think, friend or dinner is the account with us? can we eat them and still be sustainable? and because i got my shoes really dirty, please let us know in the comments and don't forget to subscribe because it, we've got new videos every friday the

into the conflicts with tim, sebastian, my guess, is alexander w, director of the economy, the russia you raise your sense for now, russians economy has stabilized this to put in incisive on war crimes. charges is none. the less finding plenty of friends so well as new found confidence symptom into a big a role with ukraine and even a fight with mason conflict. next on d, w. one small step for a robot vacuum, one giant leap for exploiting the ocean floor. but this time, a research team will study the possible risk 1st. in order to minimize them. we have an opportunity to to get it right before we even start. is this true nature conservation, or only green washing? deep sea creek. in 45 minutes on d w. we

say they're about never getting up every weekend on d, w, the slow crew come fix and ukraine will soon head into its 3rd year with the pressure on care to advance on the battlefield and re energized support in the west . my guess from belin is alexander w, director of the con, the russia you raises center. the bad news is that unfortunately, the support for your trade in the west or public is going down for now. rush is economy has stabilized and mr. pretend incisive.