to another day, another legal bottle would be 2 times president donald trump. i called in the us state of colorado, his rule that mr. trump is not an eligible candidate to run for president in that state. because eating gaged in insurrection, citing the january 6th, rise in the us capital reasoning after the rolling, mr. trump said he considered as a guidance, i guys have a great badge of on a really i'm feel go invalid and this is the day the we're very pleased with the outcome. think it's a correct outcome. they are literally trying to take away people's choices election . it is a road map and how to address this problem, which is novel american history. we've never had an insurrection as president before. every time the radical up democrats boxes, communist fashions, indictments,

i consider it a great badge of honor. i do not believe donald trump should be prevented from being press the united states by any port air voters got a fair shake in port just like donald trump did. and that's what makes america's all to on the day. after years of division, a you countries have agreed to implement significantly stronger procedures for people, timing asylum. they just calling it's a landmark of a whole, but refugee advocates say it's a doc day that will cost lives. of the people seeking protection in europe will fit face a much, tasha, and restrictive regime. many of them will be in situations that are similar to what we see now on the greek islands, which people in detention or diffract towed detention on, subject to a very poor asylum procedures. so maybe with no access to asylum procedures,

a toll on to the day donald trump's a bit to win back the wife houses under threats again from a ruling a by the state of colorado's top cause it's blocked the form, the president from the states ballot. next year, because of his role in the attack on me. russ capital, in 2021. the court did so under an insurrection clause in the us constitution. it's the 1st time the provision has ever been used to prohibit someone from running for the president. say the us supreme court is likely to have the final say over why the ruling can stand. so here's a section of the court said ruling president, trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under section 3 because he's disqualified, would be a wrongful act, under the election code for the secretary to list him as a candidate on the presidential primary about us they went on to say, we do not reach these conclusions like they were all mindful of the magnitude and

weight of the questions. not before us. likewise mindful of solemn duty to apply the law without fear or favor without being swayed by public reaction to the decisions about the lo mandates. we beach spokesman. so mr. trump describes, the colorado rooting is on democratic on the side, they would appeal that the trump himself made no direct dimension i made when he took the stage afterwards as a rally in iowa. and he use the opinions to attack is successful as president. it is no wonder crooked joe biden. the far left lunatics are desperate to stop us by any means necessary. they are willing to violate the us constitutions at levels never seen before. in order to win this election, jo bite is a threat to democracy to threat their weapon. isaac law enforcement for high level election interference because we're meeting them so badly in the balls the case. against that mr. trump was brought by

a group of color. other voters, aided by the advocacy group, citizens for responsibility and ethics in washington is the lawyer. but we're thrilled, but the court did a careful and thorough review of the trial court's proceedings. and we're very pleased with the outcome and we think it's a correct outcome and we're grateful to the members of the college supreme court for taking this issue with such care that's on the part less repeat of the report. so william blue cross to focus is on us politics as well as defense and security. welcome with it. so where did this case come from? who brought it? it's a fascinating a chain of events. uh, the actual organization is an ethics advocacy group based in washington, basically uh, you know, a sort of lobby group in a sense that, that advocate supports ethics and politics. if that's not a contradiction in terms, at least. but the actual plaintiffs that they were representing were a handful of republican voters and on affiliated voters in colorado. so the charge

from the trumpet team that the system as some democratic conspiracy. yes, colorado is a democratic state. yes, the supreme court in colorado has been appointed by the 6th. the 7 members appointed by democratic governors. yes. the ethics and responsibility advocacy groups probably lean more towards bite and, and trump. but the plaintiff themselves bring in this case, are republicans and on it to leave the voters whose voting patterns are, of course, are known to us officially. anyway. that's why i want to say, well, then why, why every public comes bringing a big cases against the republican front runner? what are so a few republicans i can, i can surmise that might not be so thrilled with donald trump and we'd like to see him off the ballot in 2024. remember, what's happening in colorado is actually happening in something like 20 states across the united states. where there's this question, can donald trump be legally allowed to be on the ballot in the states river states

in the united states run the elections. they set the rules, of course is federal law. these are federal elections, but it's the actual states themselves that come up with the specific ways in which the elections in their state get run. so that's why these cases are 1st coming up like in colorado, through the state courts are applying for the rights of ton. donald trump then become president of the united states. if one of those united states as disqualified in from running a can for sure. um, colorado would probably be, they'd probably go for bite in any way. it's a generally democratic state. so trump, whether he's on the valid or not likely would lose their questionnaires. and then there's nothing, of course preventing trump or any candidate from winning ups. you know, a number of states we see this is the problem with 3rd party candidates. for example, united states. well, isn't why you can't get a 3rd party president in united states because it's very hard for that candidate to get enough support in all of the states to be on the ballot each of the 50 states.

but you don't need all 50 or something bar and you specifically are from presidency . if you can't get on a state or 2 or 3 or 5, it's really just a numbers game. the real question here is, if the us supreme court upholds this ruling for colorado, that would allow other states to move ahead by banning striking donald trump for legal reasons, from their ballots 1st. and the primaries within the republican party and then of the general election against who we presume i'll be joe by them the democratic candidate. so, so we have to see what's going to happen now between this report and the various state courts that are, that are waiting these decisions. right? so the 2 things come out of that that well, 1st of all, the supreme court has to say, yes, we will look at this case. and of course it was a narrow decision. anyway, a from the colorado judges. yes, that is correct. a lot of these cases that are making their way through state

courts about whether trump should even be allowed to be on the ballot due to his affiliation with the january 6th insurrection. come down to the very tactical legal terms. does the word officer, an officer of the united states? does that apply to the president? do the founders and the people behind the 14th amendment actors? sorry, another founder. is this a after the civil war, excuse me? after the civil war, when the 14th amendment was passed, were they thinking about the president when they talked about the officer? also the different from the primaries and the general election. some judges, not, not, not in colorado, but the judges elsewhere in the united states, dealing with the same question i have said, well, the primary is an internal decision within the radios are very interesting. tension in the republic and part of it how much donald trump has his hold over the republican party because even his opponents, the ones that would like for you right away to defeat him and be president. although some might say that they're really just buying for a vice presidency slot in a donald trump, canada city. they're saying we, you know,

we want to beat him, you know, nikki haley, for example, the former south carolina governor and, and of a sudden a recent, almost a front runner, 2nd to donald trump, very far behind donald trump. but getting a lot of press right now, she said, you know, i want to be done with trump. well, i want to beat him, stare, and square. i don't want a court to decide. i want american voters to decide. so even are comes opponents in the republican candidate field are, are basically saying, coming out also against this ruling, a colorado saying we want voters to decide, we don't want courts to decide on it. thanks a lot. when william blue cross your paying union has agreed sweeping reforms to the blocks asylum system. after nearly 10 years of rounding, member states have not reached consensus on new rules to come in. regular migration, governments and officials say the changes will cut the growing numbers of arrivals while respecting human rights,

but charities and agencies with help migrant stuff condemn the changes restrictive and dangerous. the past almost a decade of the bait and division, the european union has reached a deal to reform its migration routes. i know exactly how what it means when we say that we have finally delivered on the migration and assign them back. it's probably of the most important important legislative dean of this mandates. the planned reform include speedy or vetting or irregular arrivals. new board detention centers for migrants less likely to be granted asylum, and sophisticated protection for people whose claims that rejected the block also plans more even distribution of asylum seekers among member states. countries refusing to take people in we'll have to make a financial contribution. instead. catherine gulard, expert and migration policy called this

a doc day for europe. the people say king protection in europe will face face much hall, sure. and restrictive regime. many of them will be in situations that are similar to what we see now on the greek islands. we've people in detention or diffract towed detention on, subject to a very poor asylum procedures. so maybe with no access to asylum procedures, a told she thinks the peck significantly undermines the ride to asylum. but brussels insist this is a breakthrough. this isn't a very important officer. to, to us citizens that have been waiting for this officer. we need to manage migration orderly. and we need to be able to do that. we have to do it together. no member states can do it alone. the u member states in parliament will still have to

formally rectify the reforms and they're not going to take effect immediately to hold off to mike cody bowers, the migration expert and director of advocacy and policy at save the children. jim, welcome to dw, i was looking at the site for children, a web site today, i saw that its a condemn these proposal saying that they will, i'm closing here. it will lead to late sentence violations of children's rights in danger. children on the move i'm the to for the separation of migrant family. so let's picture a couple of those. how will they lead to the plates and the violation of children's rights to thank you so much for the invitation and the opportunity to discuss these reforms today. yes, we are actually a while we have you seen this coming for a long time and we are very concerned about what has been decided stay in brussel

would we are mostly concerned about in this bass mass of new regulations. and that has been decided today is the fact that now all children, no matter their age, will be part of the so called order procedures. which means that they will be part of the attention like conditions. and this was south and something that we were trying to avoid up to the last minute. and it was actually usually debated that in the end. unfortunately, i could not pre be preventative. as we said, the children, we were both on the camry islands but also in the back cause and in other regions as in degrees islands. and what we're seeing there when children are subjected to these detention like why conditions is that these are very harmful for these children. they have long lasting effects even if these conditions will only last

for a couple of weeks. that were 3 off of here as well. the european union speaks of 12 weeks uh, border procedures as most refilled. this is actually in reality something that come out the cold and brought problems there. let me just jump into that just to do because i did ask you specifically about the claims made on your website. i haven't heard you yet say how, where these proposals will lead to the plates and violation of children's rights. so let's say that so in the u. n, u n c r c, these you have a child reads convention, it says that detention isn't never in the best interest of a child. and of course, when we talk about refugees and migraines, these children obviously also enjoy the same rights as to all other children. so nothing, nothing in the best interest of the child, but not a blatant in violation of children's rights. you. you also mentioned that the,

the 12 weeks the, the, the, the hoped full maximum 12 weeks that but, but children might be kept under these conditions. would that be best uh, that 12 weeks if i achieve that, would that be better or worse than the conditions that are often found in these ad detention comes in in greece and easily is what the european union is in visiting right now. we're in any way practicable. it will come to them so it will come to that. but so, so 12 weeks, if i could achieve that, would that be that so or was the what stand now? it's, it's, it wouldn't be worse by far because the forget, right? right, so just because it's important to just follow your logic. so your saying that at the moment when, when children come here through at least below the regular route,

they are processed within 12 weeks. and so it's putting the 12 weeks thinking on it would make this was it's not what you'll say to know that's what we're saying. so basically these 12 weeks are fiction and these are, that doesn't exist, i presume. right, exactly. so this is basically what point really you say, but you've told somebody being a blatant violation of childers. i haven't heard of that yet. you've said that everything will be worth it hasn't happened yet, but whatever is proposed, if it happens, you will agree. but if it happens and i, i take it once you, you, you're sad about quoting you to fiction, but if it happened, it would be back to the what's that in the house amongst the changes that is, that it's has being proposed today, free legal advice to people on the going to face to do you have

a problem with that? i know the free legal advice is actually one of the very few wins that is in there . however, we are very concerned that this is also even that is not very feasible in practice . because, but we're, um, what we are about to see is that these children will be and something and that will basically consist as a legal point and, and right now in, if we look at the greek islands, are also the camry islands, legal counseling and the access to 2 lawyers and, and to advisory groups, it's very hard to obtain for capacity reasons. but also because of these facilities are so sealed off that the access is really hard to obtain for the groups of now. and this is a systematic problem that will consist of consistently be there and also be being

an increasing problem. but every one is part of these procedures are okay. what would have been tough of your list of asks for what you would re, god as a fair and just system won't say what would have been top of the list. so i will say 3 things. why don't we want to have the exclusion of all children of these border procedures to we were also very much hoping for a fair distribution system within the european union that would allow for the states. like if we entries to not be the ones that are burdened with the majority of the asylum axis, just as they are now. because we also know and has been seeing this, if this is a major burden for these states,

and this needs to change the need of parents distribution within the year in utah. okay. on the pose. i'm will live with the doctor. thank you so much for joining us . talk to mike. read about from safe for children. jim. thank you so much. i the, there were 10 scenes at poland public broadcast it today as the new pro e u. government faced the 1st test. if it's pledge to restore a freedom of expression to state, making the police had to be called a when will make cause of the populace bull and just as body stage the state to the countries p v. p. public broadcaster is after the new government stock. the heads of t, v, p, and photos radio. the injustice let the previous government was critics sab had use public medias propaganda tools. on tuesday. postponements authorized the resolution to restore legal order objectivity unfair this in public media of the former prime minister from the injustice of potty joined the protests and said this,

talk to you is that again, such an intrusion, a forcible intrusion into the public television of to ortiz, is an absolute active lawlessness. so you want to have all the information provided according to one template, according to the template prepaid in the office of prime minister tuesday. i think that polls does a reliable information information showing from different sites. next to a mazda and somebody else, k is policy director of a future of security program at the think tank. globe 2nd welcome to dw the johns estimable. so i'm, so let's start with those comments. said from the former prime minister imitation motor. that's k q as in donald telescope, touching press freedom, what do you make of those? well that's, that's, that's the i on the, i'll do this. and then, you know, the situation as it is,

was created. it's about 8 years ago when law injustice purple is bar to but you've been referring to a new program to goals or want to be election to go over government and then subsequently change the system of public media and poland, which is still occupies quite a sizable share of the market about 30 to 40 percent. so this is still quite an important part of a media landscape in the country. so when they took over 8 years ago, we decided to abandon the whole system of i buy parties um uh, a commissions which were pointing the heads of the, of the public media. and instead they made it into the system of direct supervision from the government. so what was public became governmental and then in the fax that meant. but the system was, you know, they published television so called probably television. they are a lot saved. yours was

a to of pro government propaganda right now when the new government comes in and wants to change the system back into the public media. they being accused of destroying the media freedoms and destroying the media poorly to okay, so that's, that's the i only of dealing with popular is really all right, so just the battery a week and, and so he's, he's new to a donald task. it sounds like he's got a face and serious opposition as he tries to in his words, the politicise of poland, public, and media. yes, the position will be, will be there as deep. as i said, public media still occupies in various sizes of. ready portion of market the media landscape in the country and it was an essential tool. all the propaganda of law and just as government. and one of the major reasons for

a success and better staying in power for 2 terms. right. and they still actually came is the most as the strongest party i little bit last election. they fell short of having the majority, but we still perform very well. and throughout all the years you'd hear that the. ready the kinds, prime minister is a german, the agent. yep. and it's a little bit on the german sentiments being right, eric, i'm, but the vision. you hear a lot of the, your skeptic propaganda. so there's a lot of on time tell me to refer you to me. i do want to try and get a couple of other things here before we have to wrap it up. and the next target that donald to us got has in these sites is pollings, judiciary. now, all around the world, whichever way you go, you start talking about reforming the judiciary of people just sort of throw their hands up in the heart of what should we expect? i think there's going to be a all right. i mean, there's going to be a very tough one, is going to be super top one because the beauty of the,

i'd throw the 8 years of law and just as government, the traditional, the principle of do this for independence was destroyed because situational court was stopped with political appointees, and the same thing was a supreme court, and the system of disciplining of the judges was also deeply politicized. and now if you come in as a liberal motor reduction, how do sounds reforming good without being accused? but you are politicizing again, right? well, we will, we will talk about this again, i'm not saying, but for now, believe that you've given us a taste of what we can expect in donald that to 6 to thank you so much for joining us, mazda and separate allstate from gloves to and that's it's a more online ads ad d w and used to have the

center of the conflict with tim sebastian. as with so many african conflicts, the latest fighting into down the road, death, misery, to huge numbers of civilians. whatever happened to africa's long enough promise to silence the guns? abraham 6 ounces to such a question that at the corner of africa's problems he says, is that government? why is it still so prevalent? conflict the next on dw,

the fatherhood is not all fun and games. freeman, experience for phone change, says that the baby is due to the 9th 2 days in papa. how becoming a saw the changes made in 45 minutes on d, w. the is increasing every so many watching online things work there is holiday destination drowning in plastic white at the cost

every year of exposure. 1000000 tons of plastic. why is there another way officer ruled the environment is not responsible. make up your own mind. dw, made for mines the, as with so many african come fix. the latest fighting into don has brought death misery to huge numbers of civilians. this time, even the un has been shocked by what zip code the unprecedented speed of this integration. whatever happens to africa's low loss promise to silence the guns, but we bring him 6 ounces to such questions. these are suit, denise born bridges, millionaire for the foundation, the researches africa's problems and rewards. those who try to solve them. fuzzy

ever lose faith in africa.