the doctor. so in the clouds it, it's time to, to us. and then when generations class this week on d. w. the artificial intelligence has taken the creative world by storm making things possible that artists could previously only dream of and must install with them. and it machines are smarter than humans. the machine has the power. do we want to give the machines the power to control us? i don't think so. wonderful is the central algorithm. so we'd be doing the work. a creative artist become redundant. yeah, i think a are is replacing artist, but i don't think it's necessarily bad where some be a great opportunity other seeing if to danger a i can be good. it can be, but like every technology withdrawal and you can kill and you kind of amazed and

it's, it's our choice. what we do is the, at the 2020 to vin espn ali, a caused quite a stir. she's the 1st humanoid robot to make her own art. with the help of artificial intelligence, the her inventor, a british gallery director, aden miller developed her with a team of computer scientists, robotics experts and designers. ada perceives the environment through cameras and her eyes. algorithms process the information and provide impulses for drawing the robot than single handedly determinants or creative output without any human intervention is mentioned. and i think what fundamentally interesting is people about robotics and artificial intelligence. it is that it's like

a replica of themselves. it has something akin to a divine function. so i'm creating intelligence that i'm creating, another human being i mention. and i think that triggers the age old human log into play got screens or i thought should we fear robots or welcome them? hello robot is the name of the exhibition at the vitro designed museum and the german town of bi alarm rhine. it focuses on our destination with robots and artificial intelligence. a i for short, and the tense relationship between man and machine. austrian, emily client, you rated the show which has successfully toward the world. take a look at this me and if ops, the technology is coded, everything in our world, like a thin layer of color. that's just the fact of turnville and there's no turning back now that the genie is out of the bottle. and that's why we have to keep asking

ourselves as individuals and as a society how we want to implement this technology. the industrialized world can no longer function without its intelligent machines, but the outlook for the co existence of humans and robots swings between new topic and just stop ex, between hopes for a better mechanized world and fears, but human agency will get lost. yeah, man and the steam describe a robot who writes manifesto to make so any thoughts, intellectual work as we know from politics or aren't he's, i'm over, but that robot is as dumb as a door knob that come did noticed the vocabulary, grammar, and syntax. and it has no clue about what it's writing. hardly any other phenomenon has captured the imagination of the movie industry as much as the vision of artificial beings then not only have an uncanny human appearance, but also far superior abilities. from the trouble is to 2001 and believed runner to matrix science fiction films, including many blockbusters,

have explored humanities. an easy fascination with robot. android and artificial intelligence seem to be left to who i'm speaking. there's so many examples of artificial intel consist that of found their way into our brains and hearts through pop, culture shaping are image of robots and a i can see the things. that's why we're always disappointed when we come across a real a i or robots because they're usually nowhere near as cool as the ones we know from movies and books. but where do the boundaries between a i and human creativity, like will machines managed to crack one of the last mysteries and are increasingly technologies the world. how we feel emotions and turn them into art. mateo crees, director of the beach or design museum, is doubtful. gosh, you know, kind of what's doing the info machine cannot feel emotional. so that between 5th

and no matter how much people insist that will eventually be able to produce cynthia and machines, they won't have the emotions of a human being. and those emotions are reflected in any good work of art, whether it's a painting, a design object or a great building, the toner, it's an irreplaceable factor. it's in fact i didn't convince your that's the but what can and can't machines learn? part is leon live in child offer some insight. he started painting as a child and by the age of 16, was celebrated by the art world as a prodigy and sensation earning the nickname baby because so he's one of the most successful german painters under 30 and famously willing to turn new ground and the quinn finished one plus plus one investment. oh, i find it incredibly exciting to combine these 2 components. one says that is hiring art with artificial intelligence,

when in order to bring the art to another level and break new grounding, making it even more innovative. he gets to be in queens know in about 2 months and of course also to keep up with the times its height seduce me on dive in. trout is taking part in a study that investigating the question, what do artists feel when they paint what goes on in their brain during the creative process? for this purpose, the master class of the virtual design program, that kinds of allow to and university of applied sciences measures his brain, waves narrow feedback shows that when he painting he enters the kind of trend then it would be no cost to him. so i know we captured data from his movements and brain waves and the brush strokes he made the sounds of we recorded sounds and basically everything that could be turned into a numbers with novels done. and then we used algorithms to create data from all of that to visualize the image is what is years and immersive spatial installation has

been designed using the collected data. the artist creative process can be experienced by means of an interactive surface. this gives the public a happ dickson station of how it feels. nothing indeed, gets even put the thought that goes into the creative process. the abstract expression and energy i always have approaching my painting is something that many people underestimate. the other thing that i can be dealt with the physical toll it takes on the body, but also on the brain. oh, good. so it's really a massive effort, mentally, as well. doing this intensive creative work for hours on end. does such a bus? does the engine cease so all by the, in the future, the artist could possibly save himself all that effort. because artificial intelligence will make it possible to generate algorithms of liam live in trouts creative process and visual language. using data obtained from the study and

produced images in his style, the beginning of the on. there are parts of the brain that map certain creative work and processes viewing all. so theoretically you could have leon's, dreams interpreted and generate an image of them the next morning you'd bus. yeah, you're not good wanted. but leon moving charles creative process is still that of a typical artist. he draws sketches and applied acrylic paint to the canvas without high tech, but with dedication and passion. but could a, i create something similar or even better of moments on the whole night. that's right now, i would say no, not yet. but i'm careful about predictions as to what might happen in coming years . because hey, i is absolutely powering ahead and direct and this whole topic will be surprising us a lot to what we are made

by a i look like a brand new rembrandt bought out by a computer in 2016, a new painting by the dutch master was unveiled created with instead with data from 346 of his works, a team of programmers, designers, and scientists from the delta university of technology and a i, experts from microsoft, developed countless algorithms to calculate proportions colors, gene light and shadow and substance. with u. v ink from a 3 d printer like oil on canvas. 148000000 pixels amounted to a portrait of a man between 30 and 40 years old, with a beard, had, and color, and amazing result. but it's a really art dodge artist, veronica, go dine, uses a i to explore relationships between human nature and technology. i believe that

art is a reflection on society and post this question and i think a, i can also ask questions, but are they still meaningful? i think artists will reflect probably on a i, and that's will be a to me true art. the sad thing about artificial intelligence is that it lacks artifice, and therefore intelligence much has changed since john go to the ad made this statement. in 2018, the painting edmond did allow me became the 1st a i generated ard work on the market painted by an algorithm, stead. with 15000 portraits from various periods. it was the 1st a artwork to be solved by christie's. it earn some $433000.00 for the french art collective obvious, which provided the inventive develop, the family trees, gold frames, and the algorithmic formula in lieu of an artist signature. but

when the machine is trained on millions of images and sophisticated algorithms create works of art, who deserves the credit ai, the programmer for the arts and artist that provided the data like picasso, rembrandt, or van go a i arteries as many questions not just ethical and legal ones for vincent bridge, who teaches at the berlin university of the arts. it's the myth of the artist that matters best and big coffer. when his mind that this one does get, if i buy a painting knowing it's my boss, got more willing to spend a lot of money and look at it for hours. imagining him painting it in new york. the then if i see exactly the same picture knowing it was only created by a computer algorithm, but these, no, i don't just look at the po, result in it, but i buy the story and the person a little bit closer to you, cuz she's to,

depends on this in mid call. but what exactly does an algorithm create? what in a i do a, i used the machines ability to imitate logical thought and creativity. once you need to humans, robots and machines are the hardware. while a, i is the software standing in for the brain, machine learning allows a i to continually develop, improve, and deliver results on its own. almost in real time. humans 1st the, the, a large amounts of data in the form of algorithms. rules that tell a computer what to do. the technology brings an unprecedented level of speed, precision and efficiency. but what about creativity? is global does constituents and again, i don't believe that artificial intelligence will replace the emotions of art and creativity any time soon. some kind of next steps would be teed open for so you can

include lisp, your creativity comes partly from encounters with different cultures and people and journey school. and you mentioned using for the include and the artist to brings all these emotions to the canvas. so i don't think i will ever completely replace the human artist couldn't stop it, did some good like a child, a eyes 1st artistic endeavors were doodle. british artist, a computer scientist harold cohen, 1st developed in a i controlled drawing machine in the early 19 seventies era. and imitates human hand movements with a robot and paints its own pictures. the 1st simple shape between black and white. since the 1990 is more complex and in color. over 40 years until his death in 2016 harold cohen developed his art and technology raising the question the if what aaron is making is not art. what is it exactly

the type, splendid thing that can come in? and even if we can create pictures that are super photo, realistic, or look like van gogh or other works that look completely original and groundbreaking. ultimately, we're also discussing the question of what's real and what isn't all. and if i get boxes, how can we create our own work? i'm look to if he's an office. so how can i be used as a creative tools recently has been advancing rapidly in the field of image processing and generation freely available text pictures, systems like dob, e, and mid journey have caused a collective earthquake. it has never been easier, faster or cheaper to create digital images. at the berlin university of the arts, vincent brits discusses the latest developments with the students and the

artificial creativity seminar has come on. the seems like you can compare it a bit to when there was only classical painting. and then suddenly the 1st photographer's appeared, took off and dug up. and there was certainly resistance. and people said it was an art. it was a photo plagiarism, whatever not. and, and then over the years and decades, the idea of a photo artist to became established in con, i think it will be the same with artificial intelligence and fine artificial intelligence can colorize historical film footage and seconds. but the programs show their limits when it comes to processing complex artwork. the problem with this, i think, is that, for example, if it's like an artistic video and the grass was pink because you painted the thing because it wasn't argued, we would make it green because it's basically just working on an advert slides. complex image processing, like shading and lighting,

is no problem for the latest generation of a i base graphics programs. what used to take hours or days can now be done in seconds. this is such a dispute. what is this? it's threatening, of course that more and more people can generate an infinite number of images and the images i spend a lot of time creating no longer have the same value. like but at the same time, they're just tools to master and use wisely and embed in larger concepts. programs like dully or mid journey or disrupting the traditional creative process. the tools are impressively user friendly. enter text into the program in a eyes picks out the command as an image. creativity has no limits, even if the artist a quality is sometimes doubtful. the 2nd step is to keep them as an artist. i find it more liberating and empowering to have new ways and tools to generate new imagery and new things. and i still see it more as an opportunity. and as what does

this mean? it sounds like i know this one is funding victim that it's exciting that a designer no longer has to think about how to draw a picture. instead, you think about how to best describe it so the computer can draw it. it's more or less the same job, but a completely different approach for the the job i'm going to comes on have, i'm going to buy the photos of people who don't even exist. every single pixel created by a guy and disassembled from millions of photos of real people from the web. the advantage of somebody's butte from time facebook. imagine i download all the pictures from your facebook profile and load them into artificial intelligence and tell it to create your picture. lucky unit does no more than look at these pictures and generate an image of you that's about kind of doesn't process an existing image in a business. and under each pixel is based on the photos of you, but is its own creation. and then it becomes difficult to discuss privacy rights, a visas because we just had the students have concerns about data protection,

copyright and ethical issues. and of course, they worry about a threatening their own careers. i cannot compete with this kind of intelligence. it would always be flawless, it would be always faster. on the other hand, they're our personality and our humanity. and our introspection. this is actually what makes us sometimes better from this kind of a differential intelligence. the what is a i can develop its own creativity. how does it influence us? who's controlling who these were among the questions addressed the new 2022 production address didn't opera house. the simple opa chasing water falls is the 1st opera with a libretto and score co written by artificial intelligence. and featuring

a virtual voice, and impressive showcase for the technology. but humans, we're still in charge. right now we use mainly algorithms with a lot of different data inputs, but we still have some sort of control and i find that really hard to think of a situation where to control was gone. but then also for me to meaning is going to pulling a i can be useful in the museum, for example, at the bell house archive in berlin. the company art plus comm, used a i to make the comprehensive collection visually accessible. museum visitors can use a touch pad to navigate their way through 15000 images, fully immersing themselves in the archive. the berlin bay studio on formative makes 3 d models with a i, the process of what it calls a skilled thing is, can sold by humans. but not the result. the project demonstrates that artificial

intelligence augments its learning quickly, improves continually and delivers unforeseen sculptures of a quality that surprises, even the creators themselves. once the computer is got control, we might never get it back. if we're lucky, they might decide to keep us as pets. entire galaxies of artificial intelligence float above the compound of the us based agency nasa, an artwork developed by monica gord, dine and ralph. now the of studio drift with the help of artificial intelligence, hundreds of drones swimming patterns in the heavens, reflecting the natural intelligence of a flock of birds flying and memorization. studio drift award winning work has been inspired all over the world. the studio drift is

based in amsterdam, the 2 artists work at the interface between technology and nature. together with a 70 member team. delicate complex sculptures of light are created out of dandelions that have been fitted with ellie dees. studio drift creates part that shows high tech can be beautiful and poetic if you think about the classical artist, you know, making imagery or it was yeah. working in a way that reflects to boss styles. the i think a are is replacing artist, but i don't think is necessarily a bad thing. you know, because artist, in my opinion, good artist sugars to create a new version of the future. the studio drift also provided airborne arch for the 50 anniversary of the eggs didn't have money in 2022. more than $300.00 drones rose into the night sky and sparkled above hamburg. the concept of delight installation

was inspired by the location and architecture of the iconic concert hall. unfortunately, some of the breaking wave stars literally made a splash, whether due to external influences or technical problems. during the rehearsal 15 drones fell into the water at the premier 5 more filter or further performances of the light show were cancelled for safety reasons. everyone involved was disappointed. everything that is digital can develop a really fast because you can feel without real consequences because you can make the failures in a safe environment. but it's actually creating a, you know, an influx of a, i, in the real world that is way harder and we have physical artist know, death and our process on ways slower. because we only make physic work and that has to be saves. it has to be maintained and have to work for very long periods of time

. studio drift is now working on a commission from google. quantum a i. the aim is to visualize how a quantum computer works. a process has millions of times faster than a conventional pc. the reason for its speed is that it carries out calculation step simultaneously rather than in a sequence. a bit like a tree with many processes like growth and photo synthesis, taking place at the same time on the age limit less. there's no limit that's, that's the scary parts like week, week on comprehend where they can become, you know, like there is no control 0. it is a form of evolution. it's just like a next life for him that, that we, we can't imagine what it is like a monkey kind of kind of imagine our skill sets and what we can become like same for us with a i google, quantum a i is based in santa barbara california,

highly sensitive quantum computers are developed here and this high security compound, the mega computers and norm is processing capabilities and speed will play a major role in the field of artificial intelligence in the future. they can already solve problems that would take a normal pc about a 150000 years to solve the. it's kind of like cheating in a way, as you know, like processes of humans and the evolution of nature goes over millions of years. and basically, just like skipping a couple of millions of years, artificial intelligence is a technology with unforeseeable potential. will it take us forward or an i latest? and what role will it play in art? will it remain a tool of created or will it replace them? at some point, will it not matter who or what creates a work of art, human or machine like in a year to be surprised or some, a i creating an art piece that you know is just so out there that we like. this is

a whole new arch style. um uh yeah, but also next to that like is that the right question to ask like a who cares about our free oil con existing is old anymore because a ours getting us to ensure a it doesn't spin out of control. there need to be some guard rails, not just an art, but in politics to this was mentioned, we need to retain the work of humans, is of course a robot might even be able to do better. but to i want that on the no, i don't, even if we humans are still slot. and i still want to negotiate with another human, to hammer out laws and a framework within which we can work with technology and invitation of silver a. i lead us that our own game. will it make artist redundant? only time will tell. perhaps sooner rather than later, the

curtis men and women have fled from it on to the mountains. those of neighboring the dogs industry can. they are claiming for resistance against losing around what is driving them the dogs, curtis resistance to eat ons was even close up in 15 minutes. and d, w. china, climate perpetrator, or climate pioneers. one of the world's largest solar power plants is being built

in mongolia. almost a said if the countries electricity supply comes from renewables. and yes, china is investing more than ever in coal based pallets on that home. the environment's. isn't that a contradiction logo on in 90 minutes on d w, the you'll see about the video that goes to the other data media. amiga la, give a lot of data about again, i will stop into that and i'll give you a go or them and you are you able to order it up? joe made any of the water power into the more people than ever on the news world wide and such. but this are nice to jump be able to use them in a decade to mess with the guns already. already a few megs of appears and mid afternoon. does our pearson minutes useful or is that i'm was moved to it gets expose,

go to lunch. when you find out about all the story info, migraines, reliable news to migrate wherever they may be of faithful encounter. in the late 19 seventy's, former concentration comes inmates, no more smiles. now i meant the man who had to maintain him, go stop bogged, known as the beast of sylvie bar. the shame on you tell the truth. to use nature, wagner was dead. and investigation concluded that it was suicide. of the fire give rise to don't really have to go see the january 27th on the

is it the, the, the news my from the suspected call robbing attack in central israel. of our just at least one person's been killed in more than a dozen. others insurance will bring you the lightest pulse of on the program, the engine sites as the israel high mass for passive 100 phase glasses. how much one health ministry says at least 60 people that been killed. the strikes 5 use right in the military. the control guy, welcome to the program is ready on thursday, so i will.