Skip to main content

tv   Shift  Deutsche Welle  February 3, 2024 3:02am-3:16am CET

3:02 am
just do it better than icons, both on the so why is one of the world's biggest future best hunting to x? formally twitter post as the videos does even last, want to make x when you take talk and it's a disturbing phenomenon. but a i generated nude picks us searching online, and kids are using them to bleach of that, even though it is illegal. these are the topics that i'm moving the tech love with you soon have to turn to x to watch your favorite creative and generate one of the well, the biggest need to but who missed the base, drop the video and x for the 1st time instead of inches, this is happening as some big creative, leaving platforms like youtube. so can you log in with us leo, them to ex, all set and sweat the tank very enough time. so turn it into an everything up with a focus on videos to do that. he needs creators to actually post videos to his platforms. until recently mr. based wasn't too sure about that idea. he said his
3:03 am
videos cost more to make some what he'd done on the platform, but he'd be willing to test it once the monetization is cranking. and apparently it's cranking. now, his 1st video and ex pulled in over a 160000000 views, bring in roughly 230000 yards. however, not everyone is convinced that this happened organically. some skeptics think must pull some strings behind the scenes, pushing the video into everyone's feet, even less the based himself that advertises bought more ads to the video than they might have done otherwise, suspecting the video was going to be big. however, bringing popular content creators to ex is still a better attempt to make it a video platform than what most tried so far. last year he allowed us, as opposed to our videos, leading to pirates and movies popping up full of x foot. well, what am i need to do to create the perfect video platform? let's check out what the competition is doing right and what this go. let's use
3:04 am
those lab short snappy verticals. such as a take talk is the app to turn to one searching news tutorials, products with news or recipes. the rise of textbook other platforms have tried to copy it success. and that gave us instagram reels and youtube shows both worked. at the end of 2023, maybe 75 percent of the most watch youtube channels are mostly producing youtube show out on instagram reels, received a lot of use each day, spend regular photo pulse. so vertical seems to be the way to go fax, but creative, i'm making little money with them. ready the problem with short videos is that they don't make much money. the reason for that is simple. the longer the video, the more ads platforms kind of crowd into it. and that's why well, all the other platforms i'm pushing the short formats take, doc is actually encouraging. creates as to post along the video is now up to 10 minutes. for comparison crate is in between $1.06 per 1000. views on
3:05 am
a tick tock or youtube show, but they can make between one and 29 year olds for a 1000 use on a long youtube video. this is according to creatives who shed their revenue. you could argue that x should still just focus on verticals because that's what the views up, but to keep in mind can create as well and usually leads to more high quality content for us to enjoy. okay, hold up. so ex, should be focusing on long videos off the old, or is that another format that's possible? ext, breaking into streaming live streams boom during the tons of it and youtube instagram and take talk all adapted to this trend by improving the live services. musk seems to have noticed that as well. and recently hosted the 1st live stream on that of himself playing video games that could be a strategic time to recruit stream is to most of the a series of controversial decisions by the top of streaming, tough on twitch stream. as looking for new options, some of the biggest twit stream is have reportedly been offered,
3:06 am
unaccepted millions of years, but other platforms stream exclusively on that. and it says one thing, but musk doesn't black is much just the warning we will talk about a i generated a fake near the images of mine is some of you may find this disturbing a i generate to child abuse images off searching online. sometime ago, teenagers in the u. k. and spin use they, i to create explicit pictures of that is most likely to believe them. how is it possible to generate dfcs like that in the 1st place? and what can you do to protect your child for yourself? exploit to, to the defects 1st. it was celebrities who became victims of pulling defects. but with the technology being widely available and becoming easy it, today's, the problem is spreading. studies have shown the 90 percent of victims of women. that's a side sophistic, but kind of predictable. so what happened exactly. and those british and spanish schools, well, you k schools have reported that students are using a,
3:07 am
i think fact tech to bully that pits and dozens of spanish teenagers said they received a i generated naked images of themselves on their mobile phones. the pictures were created using photos showing the targeted kids fully closed. many of the picks was sauced from the girls social media accounts, and i program then generated a virtual image of the person without clothes on police identified at least 11 local boys who either created a set can a to the images by once up until the ground incidents like these are not limited to spain or the u. k. they can happen anywhere in the world to adults and kids like that's disturbing on so many levels. it's a crime. the kids from spain in the u. k. might not have been aware of this, but creating and publishing explicit images of other minors is a crime in the countries whether they're using ai or not. legally speaking, we're talking about child sexual abuse materials making, possessing, distributing such material is illegal in many countries. the fact that the images
3:08 am
aren't real doesn't necessarily change the fact that it's a punishable offense. for example, in another case in south korea, a menus artificial intelligence to generate mold on $300.00 exploitative images of children. in september 2023, he was sentenced to to, and hockey is in jail, even cartoons or other less realistic depictions are illegal. in many countries, it's easy to do. it's a lot to all of a few clicks to create very convincing photo realistic content. the spot has teenagers use an application which promises to undress any go using i. it emphasizes that it's guidelines include age, verification and obtaining consent, but it doesn't stick to the it's a fast growing problem. such materials threatens to overwhelm the internet. that's according to you, kid based, non profit internet. what foundation? 3 reasons why this is a huge problem. firstly, i generated images of child sexual abuse, couldn't normalize database of real children. secondly, it could make please,
3:09 am
what call the law enforcement offices. could find it more difficult to identify whether real children are risk. and thirdly, i generated images of child abuse. could hyphen the risk for children in real life by encouraging peter files of facilitating grooming. what can you do to protect your child and just felt bad news 1st, as the spanish case proves any photo can be used to generate deep fake, pornographic images, b, o, y, and inform your child that this kind of technology does exist. prepare yourself and your child to be faced with that kind of material. on a case that happens, inform the police, the person sharing such images is carpeting a crime and many places in the world, no matter if the material is generated or real. i think we also need more regulation on generative ai companies that offer a i image. generators should have said gods in place to make it impossible to create virtual needs of someone without that consent. in october 2023,
3:10 am
a low written by chat j b t went into effect in brazil without changes. it's not a good thing. and a university in prague and the czech republic has deemed writing about slip basis points us. that's because they can't tell if students are using a i to write it. what does it mean if i can write as well or better than us? brazil, a i writes little text pads should not be charged to replace stolen war to meet those. that's the basic just of a new law put into place and the brazilian city a pull to like, right, so far, nothing special. but get this. the draft that became law was 100 percent a i generated a council man. how does it in, without informing his colleagues that the proposal was written by chat g p 2, it was put into a act without any changes pull to a library's man, only found out about the laws real origin by social media. when the accounts of mine bragged about his achievements and the already other examples from around the globe by lawmakers use the i in massachusetts usa,
3:11 am
a democratic center to attend to chat gt to help write a bill aimed at regulating i including chat gp could a i right battles, little x, but at least see potential chat gpc maple 10, then even more of a mental shift then the advent of the into that states, the renowned harvard law school in the us. but have it also warns of as potential shortcomings. g p t may not fully comprehend the nuances of the law. this could get dangerous and situations that required in that legal analysis. but it's popular one year after it's released chat, gpc had more than a $118000000.00 monthly apps and uses. and as one of the fastest growing consume apps in history, it looks like artificial intelligence has already changed the way many of us right . not just in regard to legal text, but also academia a i writing a bunch of pieces. you google bachelor pieces with chat; gt; you'll find
3:12 am
a lot of information on how you can use chat, j, b t and other a i tools to write assigned to the paper by the way, i'm not saying you should do it. some universities have reacted with, complete a i bonds, but unfortunately it's very hard to identify which techs have been written by a i. as in july 2023 opened a i the mother company of touch, cvt shut down. it's a, i classify it. so it was suppose to, to, to amends the likelihood that a text passage has been written by another guy. but it has an extremely low rate of accuracy and got it wrong. 3 times out of full. other universities have called for most student presentations instead of writing to get around the problem. remember the university and probably mentioned it completely, a bullet spot so that the sees the new students. that's the 1st move of its kind of plagiarism has always been a problem in science. now a chatbox had made it even worse. the shortcomings of a i think large language models visa. i programs the process and generate human
3:13 am
like language they kind of produce and a thing that is not in that database. so they won't come up with new ideas or solutions, but more or less copy paste parts of the tax that they've been set. and there's another problem, hello and what like very sophisticated or the complete tools they repeatedly try to guess the next would and a sentence in the process. they are prone to making a false information, a phenomenon, sometimes called hallucination. that means all chat boats introduce false information. this ranges from about 3 percent in the most advanced. jpg model to a rate of around 27 percent. one of google's models, wrong information. any of this is my main. you won't get a good grade, but it's a little based on a wrong information might negatively impact millions of people. however, i can still take a positive role here. it can help with some of the more tedious elements of law making. for example, searching and citing laws that already exist this good significantly shortened the process. the politician inputs the great claims, but keeping the proposal origin
3:14 am
a secret was intentional and but his object to was not just to resolve a local issue, but also to spark a debate. on the potential benefits of a i that's all from me today, but i'm see you next time. the good and why do we need 3? miss simmons writes regression. lesbian, problem rate, and burn in south africa. people with disabilities more likely to believe that job lack lives matter, protest. spotlight on racially motivated police by the same sex marriage has been legalized discrimination in the policy. we also because like instead of
3:15 am
the ice cold b. c, at the end of the passage, any difficult to access an expedition ventures on to places that no one has the why is the i smelled the sign it reset in the i see the march on the the.

22 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on