rather than the trees in the ice fields and past the imagining you have to write a law or a thesis that's a lot of work, but then you want to kind a, i do it better than icon both on the show. why is one of the world's biggest future best hunting to x? formally twitter post as the videos does even last, want to make x when you take talk and it's a disturbing phenomenon. but a i generated nude picks us searching online, and kids are using them to build each other, even though it is a legal, these are the topics that i'm moving the tech love. what are you seeing, how to turn to x to what your favorite, creative, and generate one of the? well, the biggest need to be who is the beast dropped the video and x for the 1st time instead of inches. this is happening as some bit creates as

a leaving platforms like youtube. so can you learn most lear them to ex all set and sweat the tech very enough time. so to an x into an everything up with a focus on videos to do that, he needs creators to actually post videos to his platforms. until recently mr. based wasn't too sure about that idea. he said his video is cost more to make some what he'd done on the platform, but he'd be willing to test it once the monetization is cranking. and apparently it's cranking. now, this 1st video and ex pulled in over a 160000000 views, bring in roughly 230000 yards. however, not everyone is convinced that this happened organically. some skeptics think must pull some strings behind the scenes, pushing the video into everyone's feet. even list based himself so that advertises bought more ads. so the video that they might have done otherwise,

suspecting the video, was going to be big. however, bringing popular content creators to ex is still a better attempt to make it a video platform than what most tried so far. last year he allowed us, as opposed to our videos, leading to pirates of movies popping up full of x foot. well, what am i need to do to create the perfect video platform? let's check out what the competition is doing right. and what they struggle with uses love short, snappy verticals for jersey take talk is the app to turn to one searching news tutorials, products with news or recipes, with the rise of textbook. other platforms have tried to copy it success, and that gave us instagram reels and youtube shows both worked. at the end of 2023, maybe 75 percent of the most. what you tube channels are mostly producing youtube schultz don't. instagram reels received a lot of use each day spend regular photo puts, so vertical seems to be the way to go fax, but creative,

i'm making little money with them. the problem with short videos is that they don't make much money. the reason for that is simple. the longer the video, the more ads platforms kind of crowd into it. that's why well, all the other platforms pushing the short formats take doc is actually encouraging . creates as to post along the videos. now up to 10 minutes, for comparison crate is in between $1.06 per 1000 views on a tick tock or youtube show, but they can make between one and 29 year rose for a 1000 use on the long youtube video. this is according to create as who shed the revenue. you could argue that x should still just focus on verticals because that's what the views up, but to keep in mind can create as well and usually leads to more high quality content for us to enjoy. okay, hold up. so x should be focusing on long videos off the old. or is that another format that's possible x breaking into streaming live streams boom during the time that or an issue of instagram and take talk all adapted to this trends by improving

the live services less seems to have noticed that as well. and recently hosted the 1st live stream on that of himself playing video games that could be a strategic time to recruit stream is to most of the a series of controversial decisions by the top of the streaming telephone switch stream is looking for new options. some of the biggest, what stream is have reportedly been offered, unaccepted millions of years, but other platforms to stream exclusively on that. and it says, one thing that must doesn't, black is much just the warning we will talk about an a i generated fake news. images of mine is some of you may find this disturbing a i generate to child abuse images off searching online sometime ago teenagers in the u. k. and spin use they, i to create explicit pictures of that his most likely to believe them. how is it possible to generate defects like that in the 1st place? and what can you do to protect your child for yourself?

exploitative defects. first, it was celebrities who became victims of pulling deep fakes. but with the technology being widely available on becoming easier to use, the problem is spreading that exception, the 90 percent of victims of women. that's a side sophistic, but kind of predictable. so what happened exactly, and those british and spanish schools? well, you can, schools have reported that students are using a, i think fact tech to bully that peers and dozens of spanish, teenagers said they received a i generated naked images of themselves on their mobile phones. the pictures were created using photos showing the targeted kids for the closed. many of the picks was sauced from the girls social media accounts. and i program then generated a virtual image of the person without clothes on police identified at least 11 local boys who either created a set candidate to the images. but i want something until the ground incidents like these are not limited to spain or the u. k. they can have but anyway, in the world,

the adults and kids are like, that's disturbing on so many levels. it's a crime. it gets from spain in the u. k. might not have been aware of this, but creating i'm publishing explicit images of other minors is a crime in the countries whether they're using a i or not legally speaking, we're talking about child sexual abuse materials making, possessing, distributing such material is illegal in many countries. the fact that the images aren't real doesn't necessarily change the fact that it's a punishable offense. for example, in another case in south korea and use audit special intelligence to generate mold on $300.00 exploitative images of children. in september 2023, it was sentenced to 2 and a hockey is in jail. even the cartoons or other less realistic depictions are illegal in many countries. it's easy to do. it's a lot to of a few clicks to create very convincing photo realistic content. the spanish teenagers use an application which promises to undress any go using i. it

emphasizes that as guidelines include age verification, obtaining consent, but it doesn't stick to the it's a fast growing problem. such material threatened to overwhelm the internet, that's according to u. k. based nonprofit internet, what foundation? 3 reasons why this is a huge problem. especially a i generated images of child sexual abuse, couldn't normalize babies of real children. secondly, it could make please what call to as law enforcement offices could find it more difficult to identify whether real children are at risk. and thirdly, i generated images of child abuse, could hyphen the risk for children in real life. by encouraging, peter filed a facilitating greeting. what can you do to protect your child and just felt bad news 1st, as the spanish case proves any photo can be used to generate the fake pornographic images b, o, y, and inform your child that this kind of technology does exist. prepare yourself on your child to be faced with that kind of material and in case it happens informed,

the police, the person sharing such images is kind of thing a crime and many places in the world, no matter if the material is a generated or real. i think we also need more regulation on generative ai companies that offer a image generate as should have saved gods in place to make it impossible to create virtual needs of someone without the consent. in october 2023 law written by chat gpc went into effect in brazil without changes. it's not a good thing. the university in prague and the check or public has deemed writing about slip basis points us. that's because they can't tell if students are using a i to write it. what does it mean if i can write as well or better than us? brazil, a i writes low tax pads should not be charged to replace stolen war to me. so that's the basic just of a new law put into place and the resilience a d a pull to like, right? so far, nothing special. but get this. the draft that became law was 100 percent. a i

generated a council mine has it in without informing his colleagues that the proposal was written by chat g p t. it was put into effect without any changes. pull to ela, grades, math only found out about the laws real origin by social media. when the council of mine bragged about his achievements and the already of the examples from around the globe, lawmakers use the i in massachusetts usa, a democratic senate to attend to chat gt to help write the bill aimed at regulating i including chat gpc, could a i right battles, a little experts, at least seats, attentional chat, zip is a maple 10, then even more of a mental shift than the advent of the into that space. the renowned harvard law school in the us. but have it also warns of as potential shortcomings. g b t may not fully comprehend the nuances of the law. this could get dangerous in situations that required in that legal analysis. but it's popular one year after

it's released chat, gpc had more than a $118000000.00 monthly apps and uses and is one of the fastest growing consume ops in history. it looks like artificial intelligence has already changed the way many of us, right? not just in regard to legal text but also academia a i writing a bunch of pieces, you google bachelor pieces with chat; gt; you'll find a lot of information on how you can use chat strip you t on other a i tools to write the assign to the paper, by the way, i'm not saying you should do it. some universities have reacted with complete a i bonds. but unfortunately it's very hard to identify which techs have been written by i. as in july 2023 open a i the mother company of todd cvt shut down is a i classify it. so it was supposed to to, to amends the likelihood that a tex passage had been written by another guy. but it has an extremely low rate of accuracy and got it wrong 3 times out of full. other universities have called for

most student presentations, instead of writing to get around the problem. remember the university and probably mentioned it completely, a bullet spot so that the sees the new students. that's the 1st move of its kind to plagiarism have always been a problem in science. now a chatbox had made it even worse. the shortcomings of a, i think large language models visa a, i programs that process and generate human like language they kind of produced and a thing that is not in that database. so they won't come up with new ideas or solutions, but more or less copy paste parts of the tax that they've been set. and there's another problem looked like very sophisticated or the complete tools they repeatedly tried. i guess the next would and a sentence in the process. they are prone to making a false information. a phenomenon, sometimes called hallucination. that means all chat box introduce false information . this ranges from about 3 percent in the most advanced. jpg model to

a rate of around 27 percent. one of google's models, wrong information. any of this is my main. you won't get a good grade, but it's a little based on a wrong information might negatively impact millions of people. however, i can still take a positive role here, it can help with some of the more tedious elements of law making. for example, searching and citing laws that already exist. this could significantly shorten the process, the politician and pull to a great claims, but keeping the proposal origin a secret was intentional and but his object to was not just to resolve a local issue, but also to spock. a debate on the potential benefits of a i that's all from me today, but i'm see you next time the show india into an eye are 2 types are coming up with new ways to make houses

more sustainable by re purposing folder structures. the reason why we advocate is indeed and you can actually more dislike one of please some examples. eco immediate impression minute on d w is in new york. john torres and his family have no way to live. like 90000 other people in the city out it seems good. so is anyone helping we accompanied again family convey odyssey global us in 90 minutes on d. w, the

computer and st. and feel the same way you expect and more different things from life than your parents. i just want to pursue what, that's my thoughts or you think your kid is 2 different, risky, irresponsible, reasonable stopping port and those nonsense? i want my son to read. i'm a doctor during the clubs, it's time to to vehicle your generation with a sleep us, i'm them. when generation as class this way dw says kind of fun. it feels like therapy. the

you're watching, you know the news coming to live from berlin. the secretary of state holds crisis talks on gaza with the middle east leaders. anthony blinking has been in egypt and we'll have to could tar and israel as you've worked to secure an extended ceasefire . also coming up on the show, a 3 dad in california as torrential rain figures, mud slides, and flooding, leaving hundreds of thousands of people without power. much of a state remains under extreme weather, advisories the .