in tex problems into video, it's super realistic, but also sometimes super dangerous. also on the show and a child is not sweet and cute or just creepy. researches in china have really created one. and would you accept the brain chip from eat on musk because one person did that could be surprising medical benefits and major privacy risk. these are the topics that i'm moving the tech world. on these cute these golden retriever puppies have been created before. and i program that creates videos of text prompts, but everybody is talking about no one to just note how realistic the puppies, but in this video looks and then compare that. so this a, i generate to be a commercial for may 2023. it's hard to wrap your head around the fact, but generative a i technology could have a volt that quickly in less than a year. sora was developed by open a i the company that created chat g p t. i'm sorry, i could soon enable anyone to produce amazing movies with just

a few prompts. but what does that mean for you when artificial intelligence can generate videos, but look to saving the real and a quantum leap. if you've ever played around with video and i on your phone, you know that it often looks quite unrealistic. now, open a has taken video to the next level. they claim the floor. i can create realistic show a i clips. or you need to do this type in a problem. that means a short description of what you want to see. you could, for example, type in tool of an art gallery with many beautiful works of art in different styles . and flora might come up with this result. that sounds very easy. however, some problems might need to be more specific. the one for this car ride through the mountains, for example, looks like this. to, wow, that's a lot of text. never the less the possibilities are mind blowing. just think about the entertainment industry. special effects seems that currently required dozens of

program is, could be produced by only a handful of people with good prompting skills. unfortunately, we couldn't try out for access is strictly limited for now. one of the reasons cited by open a i is the danger of so called deep fix. they have been around for quite some time already. for example, in the form of deep st. paul. and just recently, fake explicit pictures of taylor swift appeared online, but they had the many mainly female targets before. with a little know how someone could also easily produce fake news of you using photos, the accessible online maybe from your instagram account. but the face of also being used in political contacts, remember this, one of donald trump getting arrested the impact on society. it could be devastating . defects might make it very difficult for us to tell what's real and what's not in the future, and may cause as vulnerable to all kinds of manipulation. to make sure for comp be used for these purposes open a has strictly limited access to it. currently special teams,

a testing where the source security functions and restrictions are working correctly. in fact, all generates of systems including for a stable the fusion on top g, p t needs good security functions and restrictions. if not, they can be useful, horrible things. you might remember this case from chat g p t use and managed to get the chat bought to give him instructions on how to build a bomb. normally security features should prevent this, but he got around them by telling chuck jeep it to, to take on the role of his grandmother and tell him a bedtime story about how she used to build bombs when she was younger. the dangers of generative a i a real. so what is being done about it? and saw his case open, i has announced around the robust security protocol that they want to watermark content that is produced with sora in a way that the meta data will reveal that the content is generated. a built in text classify will check and reject prompts that request extreme violence,

sexual content, hateful imagery celebrity like this, all the intellectual properties of others. they also say that they have developed reliable image classify us, but review every single frame of a generated video. full as shown to the user is saw are really that convincing well of spectacular as many examples on swords homepage let open i admit. so the program still has some tools compared to i photo generate as a video generators have to learn a lot more. they need to know what objects look like, but they also need to apply the laws of physics to know how stuff moves and understand how lighting changes in a moving scene. and sora just doesn't get all of that yet. that's why this guy is running on the treadmill in the wrong direction, or why this chest suddenly comes to life to. nevertheless, if i saw this clip of an elderly man on social media or the strong footage of it's the least amount because i probably as here it was real footage. i'm with regard to

creating fate content that people want you to believe that is a problem. what do you think? are you looking forward to creating your own crazy i videos soon? or do you think that the risks of generates of a i a way it's benefits? let us know 1st, but what i girlfriends and a i pets. now researchers in china, i have created an a i child. yep. you heard that, right? but before we freak out, let's explore what this will meet. meet tom tom, but so child developed by the beijing institute, the general us official intelligence, the other talk and hold on natural conversations under some context and maintained harris. okay, so what g p t can do this to what sets telephone up part is better to, to learn, adapt and interact with his actual environment. she can also recognize and respond to human emotions. the demo showed had perform simple tasks, seen up a spill straight in the crockett picture frame, or grab

a chance to reach the highest spots or without the human instructing. had to do so . the creative hope to one day achieve artificial general intelligence for a g i. n a i capable of all human characteristics, autonomous cognition, decision making, social interaction and emotions. for example, remember i am on the assistant job as a program like tongue tongue is a 1st step in that direction. but why make it a child? isn't that just we? it's, well, if a fully developed a g, i resembles an adult, sometimes capabilities, but at about the level of a 4 year old, according to how it develops out of calls to the child. like a parents might just be p r. people see a super intelligent ally but love children. 6 2 all right, so why should you back to jarvis? think of an air system that can perform multiple task. it's as an email for you. books to adopt disappointment brings you a coffee when you're tie. it doesn't sound too bad to me, but these algorithms wouldn't just be personal assistant, fully a ton of as

a i could replace human work as in a number of fields, for example, in customer service for finance. but as we all know from playing around with the likes of chat; gt, no matter how well develop the algorithm, it can sometimes produce complete nonsense. and you may not even notice. so and i model at st. autonomously. i'm making mistakes, could but lives at risk. take the medical field, for example. imagine an ag assisting with surgery is diagnosis or treatment. but if it gets something wrong without x but supervision patients health could be compromised. so we need to find ways to minimize the risks and as we move closer to other reasons, almost indistinguishable from humans, we might need to be rethinking our relationship with a i an a, a child might seem a little ery at 1st, but it could actually be an option for people who can't have children full, it might help parents who lost the child deal with grief, with an update to they could even rebuild the lost child as

a digital entity. whether that would be ethically justifiable as another matter. but again, we need to think about protection from a as close. imagine your virtual child suddenly changing personalities because also just stopped working entirely. and the emotional consequences for you could be severe and performing an emotional bond with an a i that can think independently and develop emotions brings up a whole new set of questions. is it ethically, okay, to say it's just the machine or do we need to think about something like a i right? all right, that is certainly a lot to wrap your head around. do we even want such a future? let us know what you think. has a lot mosque just made come up with the possible wireless friendship name to last a has been successfully implemented in a human, at least that's what the us tech 1000000 that announced the x basically must goal is to connect human brains to computers and letting users communicate with digital

devices by that. so sounds very st. terrific. still, how much of a breakthrough isn't really and was in it so you circle b c. i is kind of measure brain activity. i'm translated into digital commodity. if you're using such a device, you could in theory communicate with digital vices and a completely new as seamless way. as most puts it to left, the would enable you to control your phone or computer and through them almost any device. just by thinking does that sounds intriguing? well, that's a big downside. plus the strip has to be implemented in your brain. the surgery is conducted by a robot. it connects 6 people, flexible thread signals and a human head from the chip to the brain. for people with diseases or disability these, this invasive procedure might be worth it though. for example, if you're suffering from epilepsy, b, c, i's can't detect a potential seizure in advance and could help avoid it. must himself mentions of

the possibilities in his treat. initial uses will be those who have lost the use of the lives. imagine a stephen hawking could communicate faster than a speed type test auction it, well the late cambridge see me as with most probably have likes the technology and benefits of from it. as a general b, c, i's have huge potential in the medical field. stephen hawking was suffering from a l. s. a fatal type of molten near on disease. it is characterized by progressive degeneration of nerve cells. people affected by it, lose that much for it. capabilities a, b, c, i could have enabled whole king to type text with his thoughts, but this isn't something must business near a link has invented the other companies that have already conducted successful human trials, australia, and funded companies syncron for example. other researches even building neural connections between brain implants and muscles in may 2023 swiss company near a store managed to help them out and walk again. cuz legs are paralyzed up to an

accident. by the way, these 2 examples have a big advantage of the year and model, while they also need to be implemented in a patient's head, the surgery needed is far less invasive. so why does must clearly get so much hype? must is by no means the 1st to do it despite the height, but so far i haven't seen a person with a cloud comparable to mosque for pushing the technology most didn't even shy away from tending animal testing into p events. in 2020, he introduced gertrude pig with an implanted nearer link chip. and in 2021 he boasted about page as a monkey that could play the video game pong with his thoughts via the chip implants. apart from that, he has made some pretty steep productions about the possibilities of the technology . we can save and replay memories, the future is going to be with the set of the 2020 in your link event. for example, you must seems determined to hack our brains and he believes that these guys kind of improve individuals far beyond the medical benefits. but would you let

a must one company literally drill into your brain. there's a lot at stake. just think of all the sensitive data that is potentially recorded. what's happening into your thoughts? what do you think of musk spacy? i benches. let us know the audience of the truth. this time, excel gen, this $10.00 meets the voices of a free turkey officer. as the ad one has his 3 into exile, 2, i need the police would search my house. courageous people are trying to stem the turkish governments and sort of gibs. but only if the crime is addressed and the public trying to take responsibility for his actions. guardians of trees, stock march,

2nd on the w of the race has long begun. later when we look back, we recognized at all. that's the moment when everything changed. it's all about in the age of artificial intelligence. 5, you see, i mean, it was in china the us. oh europe. to control the technology that will shape the future of humanity, the small, it's new world, the a i race. start smaller 16 on dw the

forever young forever beautiful.