and when you're going to buy, the land owner has to make sure that his land, his property, does not threaten to endanger other people. pauline silva et radia is a lawyer, but she filed a lawsuit as a citizen. she grew up in this region and has family and both a k and all to speak to you. she says the government is ultimately responsible for taking care of the land. you're looking to go yours, and that's what i'm claiming. you're a negligent owner, that's what i mean. you're a negligent owner because clothes are deposited on your property. clothes are burnt, so they will see that robot to do my robot. but the 2 lane environmental court has not yet come to a final conclusion on this case. so how lucrative is fast fashion and what are the dark sides? well, fast fashion practices provides the retail sector and companies like she and are betting big on online shopping. we know we're millions of tons of close and up. the question is, will companies really make their products more sustainable and is sustainability

profitable? or will it take court cases and new laws to solve the problem? until those come into force, business will continue and so well the dumping and yes, it is lucrative. the the, the nature calls itself the strong this defense alliance in the world and the community of values multiple vocal conflict, but to prevent the confusion. but this view is not sure if i actually want you don't have a protein rights to be in charge. in many countries enough for con asia. the military alliance is regarded with skepticism and distrust. we often call and help

a little bit suspicious that we are being set up for the future goals, or there is a certain level of thought proceed the war and ukraine. his father divided the worlds and reveals a deep disconnect between nato countries and the global song. we don't even take from side to west also needs to recalibrate them approach. so what does this mean for need to in the future of the alliance? we are coming together. we can't expect every country to see the world the same way we do. yeah, nato should expand on a global basis. the booking of science, so in west africa, in september of 2022 youtube as soldiers detained the president and ceased power accusing the government of failing to fight and as long as the insurgency. it was

the 2nd qu, within a year, supporters of the crew took to the street waving russian slang. the movie one day here, picks up the loop and get up on the book, you know, 5 the and so says read never the 5, the year to support the military in order to testify. all countries which has suffered so much from territories and jumped out of duties. the embassy of former colonial rule or friends, came on to attack, dissatisfied with french influence and the west in general. the orchestra towards of the crew to him, to rush out for military assistance. do model and we are asking from to get out to lead to these awesome being piece because they are taking us centuries back about this to most co instigate the pricing. it's not clear, but this,

the whole region has been in the cross hairs of russian. this information campaigns for years. the cooling book, you know, fast. so was just wanting a series of military take over. it's in west africa since 2020, to have toppled governments in need. yeah. molly and guinea and were a military one test or the western troops to leave inviting russian mercenaries in instead, the russian wants to show that the west is failing. so of course, when there is a legal, a geopolitical back to russia, russia moves in everybody's in the game with just one of the play as well. you know, and that's what we have to, i think i understand and integrate into us thinking people are looking after their own interests and making a, making a choice based on what they see and what they need. the kremlin has aggressively expanded it's footprint in africa, offering military cooperation and seeking support,

or at least neutrality over its invasion of ukraine. in some parts of the world, russian president vladimir putin is no longer welcome. but here he is seen by some as a friend. and all of this, despite the, with efforts to build a global coalition to condemn and isolate the regime in moscow. rational tries anyway to, to do, of course is in the spread of their false narrative. and of course, the i believe in, in, in, in, through. so i, i believe that the best answer to this information is, is, is the truth. and of course, nato is always ready to be part of the open public debate about about dissertation in europe, in africa. on the and we will continue to appeal to everyone that believes in the little that we should look at our contractor so to speak, to forced to get there will we are continue to headquarters and brussels of to

decades in the office. in stoughton back is about to step down at 6 attorney general. she has navigated the organization through difficult times the since to start afresh us invasion. she has been trying to keep the alliance together, rel, link elyse behind to cream. she has also intensified need to outreach to global partners. our security is not a regional. our security is a global. what happens in ukraine, mathis for a strong and more successful tutoring this in ukraine? the more likely to is that you're going to see something secret happen in this outside, on the seat on april, 4th, need to celebrate that spread state. and the strong found fortune between europe and the u. s. in the aftermath of world war 2. but there was no real party moved

investors in spite of speeches full of strong commotions. today we celebrate the $750.00 spend the rest of the strongest most. and during, on the most successful alliance in history for some of the team members like hungry and germany, used to have very close ties with russia before the war. other especially, those in eastern europe have always been wary of the kremlin with visit the military trail in western poland to a need to high readiness troops from different countries are exercising. how to side side by side should the need to rise, like other countries that share at border with ukraine or russia and the to use to live under the some of the soviet union. the poles now fewer they are at risk of being attacked too. if you creating falls, they have been warning of brush, that's true intentions for years. it's

little bits for us that we are aware of the situation and we are warning the others who are showing the, the experience, our experience for men, and then the use of cooperation with russia. they didn't believe close. they wanted to make a business as usual. now they can see we're right, we're right, we can make the business, but we have to be ready for and the threats from english, because russia is russia, they haven't changed for centers. helping ukraine fight against russia has so far united states. so countries, even though key is not a member of the alliance, you installed back in fellow need to leaders believe their costs. is it right? just one of the rush us more and ukraine is a blatant violation of international law. these are the 2 competing narratives which has been central to russia's longstanding dispute with me till most co says

that the alliance has been encroaching on russia's folders for years. nato says it's the other way around. central and eastern european countries were afraid of russia and wanted to join the organization the claims that the russians and some others make about what they called nato's expansion to the east after the end of the cold war. uh, are really badly uh, misplaced and don't at all describe what happened. i was in the george h w bush administration. i remember that countries like hungry came to us as the berlin wall was falling and, and were knocking on nato's door. because they had been through world war 2, they had been through the post world war to basically soviet occupation. and they wanted defense. they wanted to be in an alliance that would protect their sovereignty,

the way the west caesar. every country should have the right to choose its own allies and not to go to great powers seeking to maintain your self interest. but this narrative doesn't seem to convince the global self. what he called understand is why do you want to expand it? why would you, 1222222, by and large um, in large, the footprint of nato in the world where we should be decelerating. the sent this off conflict, especially with one of i see globalization and the will be increasingly integrated from nato's perspective. military support from its members is badly needed for ukraine to survive as a suffering nation. but the allies are also struggling economically and have problems producing enough ammunition and weapons for both ukraine's and their own protection. rochelle meanwhile,

has so far defiance wisdom sanctions and completed the transition to a full board economy. so the supporters, so few clean, understand the need to the international community to help them contain russia. and they want countries in the global cells to also believe this is for their own good . if you validate the principle that unprovoked aggression goes on answered, it's going to be the small defenseless countries who are going to face the risk. united states doesn't face the risk of, of unprovoked attack, as long as we remain strong this afternoon for the india. and we have to open up to dialogue to other perspectives. and we have to make it clear to the country and then the global side and see which in know to the same. everyone has the interest that we are interested in dialogue. we are interested in the strategic partnership, which is going to by protecting the real estate and international, the behavior by the, at the end. and that's a lot of our them for fits but is this the kind of partnership

the countries and the global self are looking for? we travel to south africa to find out the country has as much as one of the driving forces on the continent. south africa does not see the war in ukraine in the same light as the west. the government in victoria has refused to join the western coalition against the kremlin. instead, south africa conducted terry trails with russia and up stains on every resolution adopted by the un general assembly. we joined a rallying shoshanna group in new york vittoria, one of the most notorious townships in the area. supporters of the governing african national congress have come together here to protest against violence, crime, unemployment corruption. these are the issues south africa is currently grappling with. but in spite of all that, they are proud of their country. and if they are successful struggles for freedom

and independence, we want to be treated as equals because we're living in the clinton and quote, africa doesn't make us different. and from people who are living in europe, from people not living in the mail. because we put our own destiny, we want to go to that destiny using our own way of doing things. we cannot be told because the very same people want to tell us what to do. they get resources from this theme of food that they want to undermine to deep. we support a blue one who is a victim of a meal, kind of losing who is the victim of imperialism. we have one to support them without even flinching the rest of historical legacy that might possibly explain south africa's political choices of to all. it was the united states and other western countries that supported the apartheid regime for decades. while the soviet union provided money and weapons for the fight against white dominance in the

region, the weapons us to them displayed symbols of old alliances and partnerships when nato or the west goes to countries like india. china now of course, but also in africa, latin america, to come and join them and sanctions against russia, or in condemnation of russia. they forget that these countries have historical relations with russia. that some of them have been health by rush in the liberation struggles. and they forget that these countries are also deciding on the basis of the national interest of the community sent in the cafeteria. monro, panama, my go by is the b i. p visitor here today, the politician has served in different positions in the government, including us, a foreign policy adviser to president serial rama pasa. the center has been financed by cutoff just one example of the many partnerships south africa has thoughts since its independence. here,

nato is viewed with this trust that things weren't happening right here in, in, in, you know, old continental, no one is talking about what's happening in west inside. no one is talking about even what's happening in the middle east. there's many, many places way we believe that intervention is we had not only in gaza and we believe that they have really been some kind of discrimination against that basis as it relates to conflicts that are happening. and it's only important if it is happening in the settings, geographic area and fits into these. that's what we see. that is how people seem to perceive nato here in south africa. and also in other parts of the world. as a western club characterized by dappled standards, when we see they don't often call and help, but be a little bit suspicious that we are being set up for a future cold war. based on this label, based on historical commission,

do not provide, the nato has never been aggressive. no one in the global sites has to worry about that tonight. and it will stay that way because the members days of an a to room western democracies which feel clearly and good in the values that are a state which also have clear moral principles. they don't have whenever natal went to build the, you know, a do the lock and i've gone to find out if you, if you talk about countries that are going to the global solid or countries that are not western. i think for them it's about too many movie to rich. perhaps 6 was and does change, which is that every time they did was google. it doesn't the dock and i've gotten those funds to meet with blunders. and you all kind of got us on something by which all we have a perception and i think it's a correct to that it was option because of business. while we under the sun, the do can justify what need to do the kind of kind of funds need to elyse went into. i've gotten this done up to the 911 terrorist attacks on the u. s. to ensure they said that the country, which never again become at safe haven for terrorists. the invasion of iraq was

launched in 2003 under what's turned out to be a phone street tx. it was conducted by a you asked, let call ation of countries which included some other nato members the conduct of the west and both operations undermined its claims that it wants to protect a rules based global order, the suffering of the civilian populations in the rock and that's gone is done. and eventually the humiliating retreat from a guy has done weekends, the reputation of the west leading power. the us, one thing we should to do as nato is told to throw less us from afghanistan if you saw, because it was hot breaking to see while a nato troops were leaving, or the poundage and the disorderly. the behavior on the part of

a kinase for city is the united states as been the well, it's well the best they can us into one adventure of to the other and the full has full for to the rightful modeling. the new emerging powers, like india, are eager to step in to feel defined. we are in new delhi, india, capital, the country of 1400000000 people has aspirations to become a top global power. faithful to the corner stone of its foreign policy, multi alignment. india has refused to sacrifice its twice with rush over the war and ukraine. instead, it has taken advantage of west and sanctions on russia by purchasing cheap oil and bulk. need to seems to be seen here as the party mainly responsible for the war and ukraine. 2 factors. one is. 2 you know,

going on politically and there's no supervisors that does the west and rescue, but more specifically to the not to we status and that kind of publication that's not to has done regularly on the eastern, you know, border of a shelf maple is probably the purpose of nato's to head for us at arms. it's media chris by the us to find the market towards weapons. nothing more. the 1st thing i particularly don't feel that of that is affordable on any such type of what is happening. that natural is needed. the prime minister in their rent remedies refusal to break with russia seemed to surprise many europeans who assume that india being a democratic country would side with other democracies. does this mean india is indifference to the violence in ukraine? of the question should be what really hasn't done. so india takes a lot of pride in saying that he has to be on euclid. but at the same time,

we do not support the water, the weight. all we all have also sent 15 consignments of age to create a v r one. so perhaps, so one of the most bulky supporters, all for mediation and be splendid. you know, india has a particular relationship with russia and it has a particular relationship in your up and these are both constructive partnerships that have, you know, different elements there. the relationship of russia still remains important for a number of reasons, defense, energy, security, food security, and for strategic relations and duration of rational has long been india as largest arm supplier. but the warning ukraine has hastening new. del it's input has to diversify its weapon. space mode is government has turned its focus to domestic production with western technology. this guided messiah destroyer locally made by india, is a recent example of that military drill into

himalayas. the injustice disputed border with china india and an american troops training together here it's those countries try to manage rising tensions with badging exercises like this one, reflect the bonding defense ties between india and the u. s. but the mistrust of nato appears to be deeply rooted. i think nato and his member states and other european institutions do suffer from a charges of double standards, hypocrisy when it comes to a universalizing their mission. and the feeling in many parts of the global south is that uh, the standards only apply when your insecurity or need to interest started stake. but our convenient fee set us side when other country share similar concerns about things happening in their regions and their countries. so countries like india and

south africa are aspiring to take on a bigger role on the world stage. their platform is brakes. an informal collab initiated by restaurant 2009 to counterbalance the g 7. it has recently welcomed new members. the group now represents 45 percent of the world's population excellency, part of excellencies from india food. he supports the expansion of the brakes membership. how do you spell it? breaks members have differing interest. there is competition, there are disputes among them. but what unites them is the urge to challenge a world order dominated by the west. the view of, uh, brakes is larger that just have it. uh, so you did it already recognize the rely jay, that the brakes countries dope solves countries on a rise? we don't need to be that we will stay in the brakes and strengthen the brakes and let the voice of the african nations to actually be head. brooks is definitely

a good for me to actually do that because it is taking away the power of the west. we look at the breaks and when we add them in breaks, i think we want to retain the non western on nature and the flavor of breaks because of we are not there, then actually it becomes and to rest on breaks. it's about geo politics and economy corporation. it, it's not a military alliance. nato countries collectively spent much more on defense. but the brakes nations are catching up. especially china. it already has the 2nd biggest economy in the world and to numbers, the biggest army and navy in the world. for the last few years, china has been asserting its power and its neighborhood in particular towards tay one which is considered a renegade province, but also towards japan. and increasingly, in the south china sea, a region of swift tvs, you can port this will need to countries as well as one 3rd of global trade. it

ships to the area. this is a very volatile region. we know that, but there are no horse. i mean, there are no hot tours at the moment, and most of the countries that i speak to whether it's indonesia, on malaysia, or even the indians who look like pro west and at the moment. don't want this foreign power. this foreign st. king power to come to, to the region and perhaps make things worse. so far it is mainly due as that is boosting smaller countries in their efforts to contest beijing claims in the region. but courts need to play a role. there are 2 of to old and it's new strategic concept. the alliance describes china emissions as a challenge to add security. well, my own personal view is that nato should expand on a global basis. not for a offensive purposes or just out of now you've idea, elizabeth,

because the world has entered, i think, a new period of foreign policy. i think it was, you could take 2023 is the year that happened with the visible formation of the china, russia axis. and if you ask countries along china's periphery, japan, south korea and india, they will say they're very worried about what the implications of this are. and i'll be a globe. i know i have my diet. so by whether we need to become more global and it matters whether it comes right to 3 hours away for the 2 hours away from you, we have to deal with it differently. and i don't think that in the future, but that doesn't realize nato becoming large of that and can. but the future of nato will also depend on its most powerful member of the united states. we are in washington dc where those voices, doubting the value of the trans atlantic bond, has been growing load and louder and we use money could be spent elsewhere to do like better infrastructure or like better politics and america 1st and yeah,

i think my name's can be sent to other resources. i mean, we do have the largest portion of the contribution scenario. we've been asking them for years. our country partners to contribute more contribute more or we're gonna, you know, kind of loosen up our ties. but we have the responsibility. i think it's uh, ensures that others feel safe in the world. and i think without it, you know, you have outside actors like russia in china, they're going to feel the buildings. she has been fueling and time nato sentiments when donald trump was president of the united states. he described the european union as a folk and threatens to make your opinions, pay for you as protection. now on the contain trail, he is doing it again. one of the presidents of a big country stood up said, well sir, if we don't pay and were attacked by russia, will you protect us? i said, no, i would not protect you. in fact, i would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want. you gotta say, so crude,

a 2nd, trump presidency, mean the end of nato. i do think that it's a highly likely trump will withdraw from nato if he's elected. and i think that would be a catastrophic decision for the united states. it would have negative consequences all over the world because the countries of asia would say, look, if the united states is leaving the most successful military alliance in history. what, why do we think they would defend us? we need to look at the factual elements and also to visit e since development. that sentence has inactive. that bill to prohibits in the future us press then to withdraw the united states from native. this is a good, safe guys to measure writing. in may 2024 need to completed its largest exercise

since the cold war involving thousands of troops from europe and north america. regardless of who wins to raise to the white house. many as you expect that you asked support for need to will decline any way, and the viewer will have to do more for its own defense. some see, it is a chance for the continents to emancipate itself from the u. s. and we calibrate it's approach to the global self. i believe very much that europe has an important experience to share with the world. countries coming together offer a war coming together, setting up structures. this is an inspirational, really and inspirational story and inspires me as a european, but i can tell you it inspires many people in asia, africa, and latin america. so i think instead of talking at each, although i'm always so, so to, for exemplifying all the divergence of the problems, i mean, tablets and those other interview with. but i think we should be talking to each other much more. and the geopolitical moment as perhaps right for that and as well,

we need to get all far high horse finally meet on an equal footing and accepts that there are no longer any blogs in the world. that's the decisive factor coalition of all those who support the rules based international order. because in the end, it protects everyone from indian fits for now, europe is occupied with the war raging on his doorstep. but it's this war that has shown you a p instead, little can be a cheap alone and an emerging multi polar won't change. and prospectives may be an important step towards a more peaceful future. the, the, the

conflicts, crises, every single connection mapped out shows the geophysical reality, the on the board is what makes things the way they are mapped out, navigating a changing world. now on youtube, do you want a job with a real future and a well paid font? if that then tech might just be the field for you have time to so on the lookout for smart recruits to fill in lucrative roles. but the house of looking for women tech is still a male dominated field. after all, we're going to show you 3 women, which how does that status quote and one coming up today. but 1st, let's say you want to get your foot in the door. what skills might you need right now? it's all about web software and say space development as well as operations. so learning

a programming language is a good place to stop piping. java.