Skip to main content

tv   The Day  Deutsche Welle  August 30, 2024 10:30pm-11:01pm CEST

10:30 pm
inspiring story about survival. how much do i get the tennis i was the only one who lives in nazi germany. watch now on youtube dw documentary. the a couple of how it says given how fast the big interview is a presidential candidates. the general consensus seems to be that this was less of a while, but with a more of a me vice president with vp pick got tim was alongside have put in an appearance that didn't scare anybody off, but didn't persuade anyone to a cause either. so what was the point? i'm feel gaily invalid, and this is the day the i believe that i am the best person to do this job at this moment. for all
10:31 pm
americans, regardless of race and gender, cheated to look like a leader to me, i'll be honest. i don't see her negotiated with president she of china. i don't see her with kim jong or like we did, this is going to be a type rate for us on the very end. so let's not put too much sense because we are running every $100.00. i'll tell you what, november 5th is going to be the most important day in the history of this country. also on the day social media platform ex, just gone back and then one of his biggest markets, brazil. oh, not a long boss, refused to comply with an order issued by a brazilian supreme court judge who says x rays being used to spread this information. these social networks are a good tool to main football, but they are a good tool that is being misused to attack democracy effect. yeah,
10:32 pm
i'll do more for us. welcome to the day we have just over 2 months until the us presidential election. the latest national polls, a vice president and democratic. no, they carmela harris essentially not connect with the republican opponent fall. the president, donald trump, vice president harris has been campaigning and the key battleground state of georgia. but she also sat down for her 1st major interview since becoming the democratic party, and how many she appeared on cnn alongside her running mate. tim was laid out some of her plans the future and defended her record as part of the by an administration . since starting her run for the presidency just over a month ago, cumberland harris has mostly appeared in front of a door in crowds like this one in georgia. on thursday night that changed when she sat down with cnn for the 1st big interview with the campaign. with americans
10:33 pm
deeply divided over the war and guns, the powers confirmed, she would not stop on shipments to israel. i am unequivocal and an unwavering in my commitment, israel's defense and its ability to defend itself. and that's not gonna change. far too many innocent palestinians have been killed and we have got to get a deal done. another issue, highland versus mines is migration with republican seeking to attack harris and the democrats over the issue even as a legal border crossings. some of the lowest level in years last month, the power explains the republican rival, donald trump, looking efforts to cut their regular migration to buy part of some work, including some of the most conservative members of the united states congress. a bill was crafted, which we supported, which i support. and donald trump,
10:34 pm
that word of this bill that would have contributed to securing our border. and because he believes that it would not have helped him politically. she told his folks in congress don't put it forward. he killed the bill with just 10 weeks ago before election day. harris has no time to waste introducing herself and her plans, the american public. the now, at least, as it seemed to be paying off with most polls, giving her a narrow lead, a trump. let's have a look at that appears. we have andrea glass be it was a political scientist from emory university. welcome back to a dw professor. did this interview, teach you anything about the priorities of a potential harris administration that you didn't know before? well, and political science that would have to say no, but if you were able to hasn't been paying attention up until this point. you just get a chance to learn a little bit about commer harris. you've got to see how she answered questions as
10:35 pm
to frame easily, and you didn't get to hear some of the bullet points about what her priorities and what her values for. i do think that was the purpose of this interview to introduce the 2 to the, to the united states essentially. so i think the best part of it, i think the in the main introduction was last week at the democratic national convention. and she has a book, the problem is that she's made while on the campaign trail, that she would do an interview before the end of august. and as she had to respond to criticism that she had her not just from republicans, but also from journalists, that she was not making herself available for a press interview. i think the reality is, is that well, she gave up impressed interview that certainly is passable. and she didn't make any major gas that i think would call into question why she ended up being the nominated for the democratic party and kind of had a seamless pat to that nomination. i think the reality is, is that because of the proliferation of different types of media and other forms of
10:36 pm
contact, her does not have to rely on media interviews to get her message out there were to introduce herself to the american public. so in that response, yes, it does feel somewhat anticlimactic. she didn't do herself any harm with that speech. and that was the most important thing that was a bit. but that was the most important thing that, but she just do the interview, don't mess up as well. yes, i mean in certain instances, i think many americans remember an interview that she did with lesser hold of the nbc in the 1st year or so that she was vice president. i'm in, in the interview. she came across is actually pretty slipping. and, and most people as sort of interpreted that interview was being a disaster. so as she's redeemed herself in that regard, i mean, it was in the interview of all time. no, but she didn't do anything that i think with her for chances of upcoming projects. i will take a look at a couple of issues that have been perceived as problematic for the vice president will start with gaza. she was asked whether her approach so this conflict would differ from about of the current administration. she was asked,
10:37 pm
would you withhold some us weapon shipments to israel? that's what a lot of people on the progressive left want you to do. and she didn't answer that directly but spoke instead of the necessity of getting a deal done. what do you think stopped a couple of highs from outlining something more substantial as well and the substance there is actually more we continue the by the administration's policy and she's going to continue the long standing us policy a supporting israel's right to exist as she does make overtures to the progressive left when she talks about these buyer. and when she expresses in to be in full throated terms and ways that job, i'm not always this time uh for the flight of the palestinians, especially those who are in gaza. so in some ways, she's really trying to read the needle and have both sides of the point that stayed where she wants to recognize and acknowledge palestinians suffering. she wants to
10:38 pm
continue to support the us, the stated policy that decade old now of a 2 state solution that the same time she also does not want to let go of the fact that israel is, is strategic allied in the region of their closest ally in the middle east and so she's not going to upset that relationship as well. it's a really fine balance, right. because of the certainly lots of young democrats do not like, well, actually has placed a cell phone this and i think the larger question here is whether or not be with less than perfect be the enemy of the good in their point of view. so i think the question that that people are having is one is the harris campaign be insensitive to are not listening to those concerns. and so i think there's a lot of behind the scenes outreach that's going out to after this with respect to gather and then i think it's also what, what is the alternative? so with donald trump, we're elected president of the united states. what do you think his policy towards guys would be? and then asking voters to make
10:39 pm
a choice where they may not like both of their options, but they are clear the differences between the 2. a spoke about migration as a divide administrations. that integrations are based off because bills have been seeing this problem. isaac for the debate paid, we had in the report she had, she had a question on the topic and she took it as an opportunity to bash her opponents. donald trump does have do thing, but vice president harris is actually convincing people, but she can be quotes tough on migration. so as far as the issue ownership is concerned, i suspect that republicans are still going to own this issue. and the voters who are very concerned about issues related to immigration tend to be voters who are predisposed to support donald trump anyway. think the case that she wants to make particularly to those motors, maybe a side or might be moderate and don't like donald trump. is that one child is temperament temperamentally disqualified from holding office? his actions on january 6th should be disqualified. and when it comes to issues
10:40 pm
related to immigration, once she does have a plan and that soon she supported a compromise. immigration bill that was co written by conservative republicans that donald trump was able to use it as low as to scott, all because of political reasons. the again, that goes back to the temperamental fitness and the character issues that i think are going to be central to hers is opposite strategy. what do you make of her response when she was asked about donald trump's false accusation, that she don't you identified as black only later in life and for political gain, a same old tired playbook. she said, next question plays and moved on. should she have said little, or i'm a so i, my research area happens to be on black houses. instead, it seems to trans embrace when reaching out to put multi racial close them together to run for office. and vice president parents is response was a classic di, racialized responses in year on the outbreak original issue,
10:41 pm
and then try to present a really transitive front that they see elements of transcendence in her discussion . you're wanting to break democrats and republicans to the table and be open to the idea of having a republican on her cabinet. um, so the response was there as well as the benefits problem is that many people, many sarah get paid this reaction to donald trump's claim that she was at last until she decided to be black or 20 years ago. so aside from the guy said that was patently offensive, it was also demonstrably false. ok, so here's the thing that she needs to speak worth of in part because so many other people have come to her defense. know every, the racialized candidate has that benefit and their disposal and so, well, i wouldn't necessarily sort of make a recommend to a candidate that they make that response. i think she's going to be able to get away with that because so many other people have spoken out on her behalf and spoken to the ridiculousness of the charge. why was tim, was that why was it necessary to have him there for this,
10:42 pm
this major presidential interview as well? does it make sense to not have well here, given the fact that he was physically present in georgia and campaigning with vice president harris at the time? and so certainly this was a nice way for a governor who had a statewide profile. it is on the end of the region, but probably still introducing himself nationally to kind of get his feet wet in a big national air. he certainly had done the national sunday morning talk shows as he was being considered for the vice presidency. but you know, it would have been odd for him not to have been there, given the fact that he was present and campaigning alongside of vice president harrison. a certainly gave him an opportunity to have this media spotlight before he has to do those kinds of varies on his own, at some point during the election cycle. as a great token, do thank you so much for giving us the benefit of your insights, political sciences and drug glasby from emory university. thank you.
10:43 pm
as you present where i supreme court judges or to the social media platform x to be shut down in the country. that's actually become a big company. again, flouted an order that he issued actually own me that businessman 11. gosh, because becoming broiled in a public dispute with brazilian supreme court judge alexander morris, who ordered x to deactivate several accounts of justice. that morris as these tottering political, this information and the tax on these countries democracy even must accept the judge was censoring bite, wing voices, and refuse to comply. for sales left wing president, luis in natural to do that as silver. as also wade and declared that mosque is not above the law allowed to keep every single person who has investments in brazil no matter where they are from the world. there's subject to the brazilian constitution and brazilian laws. a live having a lot of money doesn't allow anyone to disrespect. that is the kind of thing this
10:44 pm
man has to accept the laws of this country. if at the end of the supreme court makes the decision that he has to comply, it's true for me. it's true for him and i'll be able to say sales as a professor present instead is at the university of oklahoma in the us, joins us tonight from the present in capital resilient, where he's currently doing the research a welcome to the w professor. and what does justice morris think x has been doing? bill, thanks. thanks for having me. first of all. so just as much as banks and n, he's correctly in thinking at that way that access it basically refusing to accept the brazilian was in to comply with brazilian traditional orders. there are some investigations going on in brazil, on individuals we use the social media to violate prison in law electoral as well
10:45 pm
as criminal law. some of those investigations are, are being presided over by, by just as more guys in, in the course of those investigations. there have been some orders or a twitter or asked to, you know, bring down some of those profiles and so on. and in the beginning of x would comply with those borders. this is just like other social media platforms. but after mister musk bought the platform, he made it very clear that he did not accept those borders. and that he thinks the amount of censorship with whole uh, just as more as a follow through with his thread ex, announced on x that he would not comply with the courts. instruction is some of what appeared on the company's global affairs accounts today. as soon we expect the judge alexander demoralize a will order x to be shut down in brazil simply because we would not comply with his illegal orders to sensor is political opponents. of these animals included
10:46 pm
julie elective status of a 16 year old girl amongst others. so professor, what is the long musk referring to that, that he is referring to to some of those investigations that i mentioned. so in this case, there was a senator who was using his these accounts to forty's. this is sites in the military against the civilian government. in the other case that he mentions a profile of a young girl was used apparently by her father to dox, a police officer who was working in one of those investigations. and so it wasn't that context. that's just as more guys bordered the platform to bring those profiles down. but mister musk, as i mentioned is, is refusing to do that. and he's claiming that there's a censorship, which i do not agree with. because as i mentioned this uh, these decisions are being adopted in the context of investigations that look into
10:47 pm
violation of president was an old decision anyway, because sense of shape or not you would figure that working within a a particular jurisdiction. you just follow the law. so is that something more going on there? why does the law must think that it's it's ok to disregard the laws in brazil where he wouldn't do that. and in a, in the united states or even the european union or i believe's the feel that's a, not only mr must but others around the world. look at brazil nowadays as a potential, you know, case in which a stronger push to regulate social media. what has, has been attempted so far, not successfully, but you know, not, not only through the actions of just as more guys, but also through congress that was deliberating over a bill last year. there have been attempts to, you know, place some limits onto what social media platforms can do and what kinds of
10:48 pm
obligations they should have to have for. he uses the moderate content and avoids that's missing information, as well as hoops beach be disseminated on their, their platforms. i also think indicates mr. must, there is a commercial interest because apparently his, his business wasn't doing well in brazil. so he was already try or planning to moving that away from the country. and there seems to be also some kind of bullet eco, you know, the same. but the other part of mr. musk for the present in the far right. it's interesting you, you say that if it's not doing well commercially and visit, i saw an estimate today that something like $40000000.00 brazilians, mostly a 5th of the population access x at least once a month. which sounds like a massive market for a long must match a sacrifice in this way. it is, it is a, you know,
10:49 pm
reasonable or sizable market for any social media platform. which is a reason why many people doubts that must would take things as far as he did. the information that we listen to here is that the, you know, that the branch here wasn't doing well commercially in terms of the ads that they are able to sell, for example sites. but yes, your rights that the platform is widely used in brazil. uh like, i think it happens elsewhere as well is a platform that that's a kind of neat platform. so it's, it's very much used by jordan list, or by some, you know, uh, internet businesses or by some like a damage to, to engaging exchanges of ideas. but but yeah it's, it's, it's a decent number and i think brisbane is, are going to do me is asked if it's really banned in the next couple of days. and so tell us about the, the judge at the center of his case,
10:50 pm
supreme court to justice, alexandra de morris, who is a, a t is actually, you know, relatively conservative a lawyer. he was a prosecutor in the state of some follow up before answering politics. i think he bring some of that mac 40 investigation from his origins in the public prosecutor's career. he got to the supreme court during the term of president tamar, who replaced president to my roost. f. f. a. after she was engaged in the, you know, he's always the same actually as a very conservative judge, very, very, a tough, tough on crime was a judge or, or legal scholar even which you also as a but it's in that makes things very interesting because nowadays they bring their far, i'd suggest is that he's working in line with the president when they actually come
10:51 pm
from very different the camps politically good talking to your professor types are talking to so that visit expert professor of february, do so at silva from the university of oklahoma, thank you so much. thank you so much. i added to okay. and the legal bottle of a press freedom involving a dodge avella. uh jen list. uh, glen may now move a was for our tucker service, who was convicted last year versus the critical social media post by the construction company with ties to the government was founded a suspended sentence, which was upheld by a higher court. it is stumble. the w is in the process of repeating that decision you'll hear from, but that in just a moment. first, corresponding uni hon. looks at the why the fight over press freedom into a street interview, canada and you in jail and talking 33 year old and
10:52 pm
a little bit from ease me. it was arrested earlier this month after she criticized president french of taiyah babylon. on the popular turkish youtube channel totally was saying you were reading june the 21st century, handing the entire republic of tacky to one mind means he'll treat it like his father's farm, or who to give you a call on that. who has just been released, pending trial, but she could still face up to 3 years in prison. lawyer told us, for allegedly insulting the president and inciting public hatred, defenders and investigations being launched. and they're looking for elements of the crime. all the statements for them to the right to freedom of opinion move. it looks like they want to prevent citizens from expressing public criticism. and do my best case. that's just one of the many in talking with freedom of expression and freedom of the press has come under immense pressure and recent news. media rights
10:53 pm
group report is without bored as ranks turkey. $158.00 out of $180.00 countries and its most recent world press freedom index and accuse us ad one's government of state hostility towards the press and undermining an independent journalism. the government has taken the control of over 85 percent of the national uh, private media market. and this was uh, this policy does reach to amazon. com doctor when he came to, to cover the amys to appeal to a society wedge. and that is actually a kitchen national enough. noodles have also tightened ad one's control over all 9 sites and social media. at least 131 john, and as to what detained in turkey. in the last decade report is when the order says and hundreds prosecuted for that was the one of them is the double use put
10:54 pm
into my for criticized on the east double construction company with ties to the government on social media in 2020 my was handed a suspended sentence of one year is 8 months in prison for illegally publishing personal data that he contents, he was doing journalistic work. dw, direct to general peter lynn book, described the accusations as unfounded saying in mamma is a feel is experienced and critical journalist from the tax shall thirty's appear, intend on silencing the w says it will challenge the conviction that toby's constitutional court a spark of hope for food and who am i and other tuckers journalist who say they won't be silenced and continue to do their jobs. the finally tonight, many of us churches are architectural landmarks and major tourist attractions. the
10:55 pm
one in portugal has a decidedly different appeal. since portugal is also a popular destination for surfing once a day in the baptist pasta decided to set up a seth church in the country. second, think for whatever reason is governance assess before sunday service. why then welcomed as they off even in swim with incentives? erosion in front of the church is also hundreds of baptisms. so is found a savvy hope to attract a new version of those by combining is to biggest passions. and that's the day you can follow the i team on social media at b, w use. they just headlines always available. of course on dw combo on the thing definitely have a good day have a great weekend. the
10:56 pm
10:57 pm
the recalled the warriors of light, jehovah witnesses, disciples of the go gurus, former cult members, discuss being self sacrifice, mental and physical abuse. difficult escape the hard roads back to life in 15 minutes. dw rico india. house is close on the account needs to stay gross goals all the time on that do
10:58 pm
a race and with extinction because their main fixel's is disappearing. environmentalists and fishermen on the pricing for the survival of this race bc count eco indian and 19 minutes on dw the on the long voyage through the ocean. and mother, i'm back with her car for a long time. they had to be humans on the journey. but now the premises have to come to protect the ocean
10:59 pm
on the living independently, rise to society is full of contrasts and in equality is a big challenge. many problems can only be solved by working together. yes, i think i pretend isn't misleading. what is home? then they will not go such a roof over your head. you must come for a place to rest. let us in a refuge from the rouse keys are the most important thing you can have and for he has seen how do we tackle the major issues about time? let's talk about the system. there is a significant risk of human extinction from advancing our systems. and changes the
11:00 pm
new frontier of sofa. our series continues on since september 1st on d, w the . this is the news. these are top stores. germany has resumes, deportation fights, rough context, on fridays flights with 28. the forty's on board was the 1st and so toddler, boundary to power in 2021. the german government is facing increasing pressure to track down on migration following last week's faithful 9 front page in zoning of cranes, air force commander michel. alas, joke has been dismissed days after a ukrainian of 16 was bound killing its pirates as he attempted to ward off a russian attack your trans.

11 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on